The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Spergerrand → Bitcoin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. In fact, I don't think the word "Spergerrand" is mentioned anywhere else on the Internet, other than a few wikipedia scrapers.(The spelling vaguely suggests to me that the word could(?) be a portmanteau of "Asperger's" and "random", but as for why one would use such a term to refer to Bitcoin is beyond me.) As far as I can tell, this word was coined for the very first time in the history of humankind when Your Lord and Master created this redirect way back in 2012. So, delete. Duckmather (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom, wasn't able to find any non-Wikipedia uses. Rusalkii (talk) 23:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an invented WP:NEO. I suspect it's more likely a portmanteau of sperg and Krugerrand. - Eureka Lott 02:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per nom, wasn't able to find any non-Wikipedia uses. Never heard of it, appears to be jargon. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not a real term. (Looking at the author’s contributions they seemed to have had some sort of vendetta against Bitcoin) StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tokyo International Airport → Haneda Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It could refer to any of the two international airports in Japan. Interstellarity (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "Tokyo International Airport" is officially Haneda Airport. To refer to Narita Airport as Tokyo, you'd have to specify "New Tokyo International Airport" or "Tokyo-Narita International Airport". -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: already sufficiently disambiguated via hatnote. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 20:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: this is the official name of Haneda Airport, and there is already a useful hatnote at the target for disambiguation. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• NIAF → Iraqi security forces  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"NIAF" is not mentioned at the target, probably because it's not used commonly to mean "National Iraqi Armed Forces". It is used to mean National Italian American Foundation but we have no article about that. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig for now. The National Italian American Foundation is clear primary topic and very likely notable, but until we have an article then it should be a disambig. Other uses include National IA Forum (mentioned at UK cyber security community#Cross-sector bodies), Nigerian Institute of American Football (mentioned at American football in Nigeria), Netherlands Institute for Animation Film (mentioned at EYE Film Institute Netherlands#EYE Collection Centre but I'm not certain this is enough for a dabmention), and Nigerian Infrastructure Advisory Facility (no good mention). Thryduulf (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig per above. Seems to be enough to make a DAB page, though I will note that National Italian American Foundation has been deleted twice through AfD. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Viennoise → Vienne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect redirect and the target clear unclear. The article formerly at the target title, Vienne (department), does not mention the redirect either. The closest title match I could find, and the most common match via third-party search engines, is Viennoiserie, but I'm not sure if that is correct. Steel1943 (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Retarget to Vienne (department) as before. The adjectival form is unlikely to be used for the various other villages etc with the name, at the disam page. Did you mean "unclear"? Johnbod (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Johnbod: Yes, and did you mean "retarget to Vienne (department)"?. Steel1943 (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also yes! Johnbod (talk) 18:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Vienne, Isère. wikt:Viennoise says this is the feminine form of "Viennois" and indicates to me that the correct target is Vienne, Isère. Viennois already targets Vienne, Isère so this course of action is consistent. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To Vienne (department) or Vienne, Isère?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RFOREIGN, given that there are no incoming links from article space. If it is decided to keep the redirect, it should continue to target the existing Vienne dab page, in that it is the correct feminine form of the French demonym not only for Vienne, Isère but also for all the French villages listed on that dab page, as well as for Vienna, Austria. In response to other suggestions, the correct French demonym for Vienne (department) is poitevin; Viennoiserie are, etymologically speaking, pastries made in the style of Vienna. Also note that while viennoise is indeed the feminine form of viennois the demonym, the primary meaning of Viennois in English is not the demonym but the region around Vienne, Isère (historically known as the Duchy, County or Dauphiné of Viennois depending on the period). Accordingly, the current redirect for Viennois should almost certainly remain unchanged, but should not influence the decision on what to do with Viennoise. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Just keep it as is then. --Joy (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Rosbif73's detailed explanations. Jay 💬 10:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: one more try for consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 11:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dchicha → Chorba frik  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was created by means of an undiscussed move and reverted immediately after. However, it is a title that is not mentioned at the target page, and seemingly not a noteworthy alternative name. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Add mention this does seem to be an alternative name for the target based on google searches, and noting both names seems particularly common in French-language sources (e.g. the lead at fr:Chorba frik states "Dchicha" (alternatively transliterated "tchicha") was the original name). Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If this was created as essentially an administrative error, and is not mentioned on the target page, nor is a noteworthy alternative name... then let's just get rid of it. - Dyork (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It does appear to be a noteworthy alternative name though. Thryduulf (talk) 14:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention has not been added yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is no mention of such name in the target article (a variant of the Chorba), nor should there be. Tchicha refers to barley semolina, which is different from Frik (also known as Freekeh). M.Bitton (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Shalini Bathina → The Venery of Samantha Bird  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Actress mentioned at several pages, including Little Voice (TV series) and Initiation (2020 film). Delete to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tyrone Brown (actor) → The Venery of Samantha Bird  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Actor mentioned at several pages beyond just the one, including at Beat the World. Delete to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Doug Savan → The Venery of Samantha Bird  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is seemingly an actor that played in this movie. Not synonymous with the movie by any means, and a red link seems to be more worthwhile for this purpose.

A reflection into November 2023, and wow. The history here is so egregious and I can't believe I didn't see this when the initial SPI was coming along. The creator of this redirect also created the page it points to. It was made by Crafterstar in draftspace, and was moved by their own sock into mainspace, which had earlier swindled a page mover perm out of process, and didn't leave a draftspace redirect when moving to main, for some reason. Hiding evidence that it was once a draft? Beyond me. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meant to add that my external searches for this actor turned up exclusively Doug Savant topics. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing you meant September 2023 since that's when Crafterstar/Ebbedlila made the article and then sockpuppet-shoved it into mainspace. In any case, yeah, that's... that's pretty blatant sockpuppetry. ...In any case, though, they're pretty solidly blocked indefinitely, and the case shut. So, back on topic...

Delete as per nom and WP:REDLINK seems like the way to go. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 08:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Adam Faison → The Venery of Samantha Bird  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Adam Faison is mentioned on the pages of several films, including Hellraiser (2022 film) and Everything's Gonna Be Okay. Similarly to Ebbedlila's deleted actor redirects, this should be deleted to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ricky Eat Acid. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Starry Cat → Teen Suicide (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Only bears one mention on Wikipedia, being an alternate name for Ricky Eat Acid, who is a part of this band. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ricky Eat Acid. If the user wanted info on the band from searching up one alternate name for one of the members, the band is mentioned in the article's opener. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 08:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Starry Cat was a bunch of Teen Suicide songs that were released as a standalone project to raise money for one of the band members. It may not be reflected in the article, but I can just make that change and reference it. It wouldn’t make sense to redirect to Ricky Eat Acid — the same members who participated on the Starry Cat album are the (now-past) band members listed on the Teen Suicide page.Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 02:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then... why is Starry Cat listed as one of Ricky Eat Acid's aliases on his page, if Starry Cat was an alias for the whole band?? Prolly should fix that one while you're at it, lol. Will change my vote to Keep after this change. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 02:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you edited it before I could fix my comment. It should be redirected to the page you specified. I realized Sam recorded Starry Cat alone, and although it was released for the benefit of a Teen Suicide member, he was the solo architect of the album. My apologies. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 02:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, fair enough. Keeping my own vote as Retarget, then. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Legislative committee → Committee  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Newly created redirect; using the word "legislative" in the title would seemingly imply something more specific than ending up at the general page for committees. While there is material about legislation at the target, from my point of view the more-specific operator in this title is "legislative", and due to this Legislature may be a more preferable target here. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless there is a description in some article. In Legislature too, there is a smattering of "committee", but nothing really that will help a reader understand what a Legislative committee is. Jay 💬 18:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Public account. (non-admin closure) 😸 Cremastra (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Public Accounts → Public accounts committee  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are many titles on Wikipedia that include "Public Accounts" in the title. In regards to having the same name, Public Account (India) exists. There are many public accounts committees, and public accounts committee covers a lot of these. There is, also, a Public Accounts Commission beyond the committees, an article for Public Account without the "s", and a more general Public accounting which currently redirects to Accountant. (Perhaps Accounting is more expected there, but not the topic). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• In the absence of lowercase redirects Public accounts or Public account, retarget to the target of Public accounting as an ((R from avoided double redirect)). Jay 💬 18:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Public account was created as a dab page. Retarget it there. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Retarget per Pppery. Jay 💬 17:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was minimal participation despite a 2nd and 3rd relist. Synchronizing all to Industrial society as a compromise. Jay 💬 05:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Industrial labor → Industrial society  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Industrial Labor → Capitalism#Wage labor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Industrial labour → Capitalism#Wage labor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects should most likely be synchronized, but I'm not sure which target is the most proper. (Note: Capitalism#Wage labor links to Wage labor in a hatnote in that section.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Industrial Labor and Industrial labour to Industrial society This looks like the better option to me, as wage labor is not necessarily industrial. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:REDLINK. We should encourage an article to be written on this topic. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 23:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'd suggest a retarget/refine to Industrial society#Industrial labour, but that section is already flagged as in desperate need of sources, so might be a bad retarget. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. While it has been established that the term is ambiguous, further discussion needs to happen to decide a primary topic. Disambiguating via a hatnote for now. Jay 💬 20:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kanpachi → Greater amberjack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kampachi → Greater amberjack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

"Kanpachi" is not mentioned on the target page. I tried to verify this myself and got very conflicting results about whether this is the correct target. Kanpachi is definitely a Seriola, but is it this Seriola? I don't know how to evaluate which of these sources are reliable and would appreciate input from someone who does. Wikispecies agrees that this is the correct target, but of course, that's user-generated. Kanpachi is a Japanese word and in katakana is カンパチ, if this helps anyone. asilvering (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate/ The Japanese Wikipedia article ja:カンパチ is about Seriola dumerili (greater amberjack), but says (translated by Google) "S. rivoliana is very similar to this species and is sometimes confused with this species." Searching FishBase for the common name "kanpachi" only returns S. dumerili.

However, searching Google for "kanpachi" returns pages that mention the scientific name Seriola rivoliana (some calling it "Hawaiian kampachi", others just calling it "kanpachi"). And pages that don't mention a scientific name often make it clear that they are referring to a fish that is farmed (not wild-caught) in Hawaii (i.e. Seriola rivoliana). From what I'm seeing from Google, I think "kanpachi", in English, refers to S. rivoliana more often than S. dumerili.

Common names for fish eaten as seafood often refer to multiple species. The US FDA says that Lutjanus campechanus is the only species that can be marketed as "red snapper", but there is zero enforcement and I regularly see fish labelled as red snapper with a country of origin well outside the range of L. campechanus. Plantdrew (talk) 22:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment added kampachi, which is an alternative romanisation of the same Japanese word, pointing to the same target. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Fishbase has Kanpachi as the Japanese common name for Seriola dumerili and Hirenaga-kanpachi (longfin kanpachi) as the Japanese common name for Seriola rivoliana. While we can't use Wikipedia as a source for material in articles, the fact that editors at the Japanese Wikipedia have Kanpachi at Seriola dumerili suggests it is the primary topic. I think the redirect as is or disambiguation can both be supported, but if the article doesn't mention kanpachi then we should disambiguate. —  Jts1882 | talk  07:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote or Dabify, as per Plantdrew.-- i.e. Kanpachi redirects here. For the species referred to as Hirenaga-kanpachi, see Longfin yellowtail. (Can one put a reference in a hatnote?) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 08:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Raspberry Ukraine → Ukrainians in Kuban  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

no mention on target page. I have no idea what this means, tried a quick google, nothing immediately obvious. Redirect should be deleted unless someone can add supporting content at Ukrainians in Kuban. asilvering (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's based on a weird historic name and subsequent wonky translation of 'Malynovyi Klyn' see Klyn. Sorry it seems that i forgot to get rid of the pipe on that page when i made the redirect—blindlynx 17:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Ukrainians in Kuban to Malynovyi Klyn in line with other Klyn pages might be a solution—blindlynx 18:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Besides the nom's concern, for some reason, this redirect made me think of Raspberry Pi, and that's not right. Steel1943 (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on blindlynx's suggestion? Klyn has similar instances.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support for Blindlynx's suggestion. Seems correct to me? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Add mention of Raspberry Ukraine at the target, similar to how it is mentioned at the Klyn dab, regardless of whether the target stays at current title or Malynovyi Klyn. Jay 💬 18:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Added a mention at the target. I think Asilvering's and Steel1943's concerns should be allayed now, and the title of the target can be hashed out with a requested move. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Idioprothoraca → Embioptera  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Rhipineoptera → Orthoptera  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Terms that are only linked from Sociality as their only mentions on Wikipedia, and neither are mentioned at their respective targets. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can vouch for the fact it was only used for the taxonomic families with redlinks. I don't really care that much about my enwiki articles, as most of them were made for redlink fixing. I didn't do much research on the names too. So, Delete. RiggedMint (talk) 14:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. These were proposed as clades that include more than their current targets (Idioprothoraca is Embioptera and Notoptera; Rhipineoptera is Plecoptera, Blattodea, Mantodea, Orthoptera, Phasmatodea and Dermaptera). These clade names don't seem to be accepted by anybody other than the person (Nikita Kluge) who named them, and he has a idiosyncratic approach to nomenclature (he uses Saltatoria for what everybody else calls Orthoptera). The clade names nominated here were linked in a previous version of the Neoptera article, but that article no longer follows Kluge. Plantdrew (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Railway Approach → Hung Hom station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a topic mentioned at the target article. The only time the word "approach" is ever said at the target is in the sentence: "New approach tracks have also been built." Appears to possibly be a general topic, without any context at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete my search results are overwhelmed by street names in England. Thryduulf (talk) 14:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Rutland Quadrant → Kowloon Tong  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Rutland" or "Quadrant" at the target article. The only mention that "Rutland Quadrant" has on Wikipedia is within a table on Route 1 (Hong Kong), not wikilinked. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ho King Toi → Peng Chau  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Topic is not covered at the target article, no mentions of the subject, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 5:-) → Emoticon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An emoticon not mentioned at the target, and no longer mentioned at List of emoticons either. The five is supposed to indicate Elvis Presley's haircut, presumably. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Elvi5 Pre5ley has left the building, this should too. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is pretty darn cute to see in this day and age. Delete 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 20:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted. The redirect was speedily deleted by User:Whpq per my request under WP:G7. (non-admin closure) Luke10.27 (talk) 03:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ghanaians in Sweden → African immigrants to Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Overall, I think this is a fine redirect. However, the target article doesn't talk about Ghanaians (or Ghana) at all. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, thanks for catching that! I'll double-check these demographic redirects in the future. Can I just tag it for speedy deletion? Luke10.27 (talk) 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).