In calculus, it is usually possible to compute the limit of the sum, difference, product, quotient or power of two functions by taking the corresponding combination of the separate limits of each respective function. For example,
and likewise for other arithmetic operations; this is sometimes called the algebraic limit theorem. However, certain combinations of particular limiting values cannot be computed in this way, and knowing the limit of each function separately does not suffice to determine the limit of the combination. In these particular situations, the limit is said to take an indeterminate form, described by one of the informal expressions
where each expression stands for the limit of a function constructed by an arithmetical combination of two functions whose limits respectively tend to or as indicated.^{[1]}
A limit taking one of these indeterminate forms might tend to zero, might tend to any finite value, might tend to infinity, or might diverge, depending on the specific functions involved. A limit which unambiguously tends to infinity, for instance is not considered indeterminate.^{[2]} The term was originally introduced by Cauchy's student Moigno in the middle of the 19th century.
The most common example of an indeterminate form is the quotient of two functions each of which converges to zero. This indeterminate form is denoted by . For example, as approaches the ratios , , and go to , , and respectively. In each case, if the limits of the numerator and denominator are substituted, the resulting expression is , which is indeterminate. In this sense, can take on the values , , or , by appropriate choices of functions to put in the numerator and denominator. A pair of functions for which the limit is any particular given value may in fact be found. Even more surprising, perhaps, the quotient of the two functions may in fact diverge, and not merely diverge to infinity. For example, .
So the fact that two functions and converge to as approaches some limit point is insufficient to determinate the limit
An expression that arises by ways other than applying the algebraic limit theorem may have the same form of an indeterminate form. However it is not appropriate to call an expression "indeterminate form" if the expression is made outside the context of determining limits. An example is the expression . Whether this expression is left undefined, or is defined to equal , depends on the field of application and may vary between authors. For more, see the article Zero to the power of zero. Note that and other expressions involving infinity are not indeterminate forms.
"0/0" redirects here. For the symbol, see Percent sign. 
The indeterminate form is particularly common in calculus, because it often arises in the evaluation of derivatives using their definition in terms of limit.
As mentioned above,
while
This is enough to show that is an indeterminate form. Other examples with this indeterminate form include
and
Direct substitution of the number that approaches into any of these expressions shows that these are examples correspond to the indeterminate form , but these limits can assume many different values. Any desired value can be obtained for this indeterminate form as follows:
The value can also be obtained (in the sense of divergence to infinity):
Main article: Zero to the power of zero 
The following limits illustrate that the expression is an indeterminate form:
Thus, in general, knowing that and is not sufficient to evaluate the limit
If the functions and are analytic at , and is positive for sufficiently close (but not equal) to , then the limit of will be .^{[3]} Otherwise, use the transformation in the table below to evaluate the limit.
The expression is not commonly regarded as an indeterminate form, because if the limit of exists then there is no ambiguity as to its value, as it always diverges. Specifically, if approaches and approaches then and may be chosen so that:
In each case the absolute value approaches , and so the quotient must diverge, in the sense of the extended real numbers (in the framework of the projectively extended real line, the limit is the unsigned infinity in all three cases^{[4]}). Similarly, any expression of the form with (including and ) is not an indeterminate form, since a quotient giving rise to such an expression will always diverge.
The expression is not an indeterminate form. The expression obtained from considering gives the limit provided that remains nonnegative as approaches . The expression is similarly equivalent to ; if as approaches , the limit comes out as .
To see why, let where and By taking the natural logarithm of both sides and using we get that which means that
The adjective indeterminate does not imply that the limit does not exist, as many of the examples above show. In many cases, algebraic elimination, L'Hôpital's rule, or other methods can be used to manipulate the expression so that the limit can be evaluated.
When two variables and converge to zero at the same limit point and , they are called equivalent infinitesimal (equiv. ).
Moreover, if variables and are such that and , then:
Here is a brief proof:
Suppose there are two equivalent infinitesimals and .
For the evaluation of the indeterminate form , one can make use of the following facts about equivalent infinitesimals (e.g., if x becomes closer to zero):^{[5]}
For example:
In the 2nd equality, where as y become closer to 0 is used, and where is used in the 4th equality, and is used in the 5th equality.
Main article: L'Hôpital's rule 
L'Hôpital's rule is a general method for evaluating the indeterminate forms and . This rule states that (under appropriate conditions)
where and are the derivatives of and . (Note that this rule does not apply to expressions , , and so on, as these expressions are not indeterminate forms.) These derivatives will allow one to perform algebraic simplification and eventually evaluate the limit.
L'Hôpital's rule can also be applied to other indeterminate forms, using first an appropriate algebraic transformation. For example, to evaluate the form 0^{0}:
The righthand side is of the form , so L'Hôpital's rule applies to it. Note that this equation is valid (as long as the righthand side is defined) because the natural logarithm (ln) is a continuous function; it is irrelevant how wellbehaved and may (or may not) be as long as is asymptotically positive. (the domain of logarithms is the set of all positive real numbers.)
Although L'Hôpital's rule applies to both and , one of these forms may be more useful than the other in a particular case (because of the possibility of algebraic simplification afterwards). One can change between these forms by transforming to .
The following table lists the most common indeterminate forms and the transformations for applying l'Hôpital's rule.
Indeterminate form  Conditions  Transformation to  Transformation to 

/  —


/  —
 