Part of a series of articles about
Calculus
${\displaystyle \int _{a}^{b}f'(t)\,dt=f(b)-f(a)}$
Fundamental theorem Limits Continuity Rolle's theorem Mean value theorem Inverse function theorem
Differential Definitions Derivative (generalizations) Differential infinitesimal of a function total Concepts Differentiation notation Second derivative Implicit differentiation Logarithmic differentiation Related rates Taylor's theorem Rules and identities Sum Product Chain Power Quotient L'Hôpital's rule Inverse General Leibniz Faà di Bruno's formula Reynolds
Integral Lists of integrals Integral transform Leibniz integral rule Definitions Antiderivative Integral (improper) Riemann integral Lebesgue integration Contour integration Integral of inverse functions Integration by Parts Discs Cylindrical shells Substitution (trigonometric, tangent half-angle, Euler) Euler's formula Partial fractions Changing order Reduction formulae Differentiating under the integral sign Risch algorithm
Series Geometric (arithmetico-geometric) Harmonic Alternating Power Binomial Taylor Convergence tests Summand limit (term test) Ratio Root Integral Direct comparison Limit comparison Alternating series Cauchy condensation Dirichlet Abel
Vector Gradient Divergence Curl Laplacian Directional derivative Identities Theorems Gradient Green's Stokes' Divergence generalized Stokes
Multivariable Formalisms Matrix Tensor Exterior Geometric Definitions Partial derivative Multiple integral Line integral Surface integral Volume integral Jacobian Hessian
Advanced Calculus on Euclidean space Generalized functions Limit of distributions
Specialized Fractional Malliavin Stochastic Variations
Miscellaneous Precalculus History Glossary List of topics Integration Bee Mathematical analysis Nonstandard analysis
v t e

A fluxion is the instantaneous rate of change, or gradient, of a fluent (a time-varying quantity, or function) at a given point.^[1] Fluxions were introduced by Isaac Newton to describe his form of a time derivative (a derivative with respect to time). Newton introduced the concept in 1665 and detailed them in his mathematical treatise, Method of Fluxions.^[2] Fluxions and fluents made up Newton's early calculus.^[3]

History

Fluxions were central to the Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy, when Newton sent a letter to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz explaining them, but concealing his words in code due to his suspicion. He wrote:^[4]

I cannot proceed with the explanations of the fluxions now, I have preferred to conceal it thus: 6accdæ13eff7i3l9n4o4qrr4s8t12vx.

The gibberish string was in fact a hash code (by denoting the frequency of each letter) of the Latin phrase Data æqvatione qvotcvnqve flventes qvantitates involvente, flvxiones invenire: et vice versa, meaning: "Given an equation that consists of any number of flowing quantities, to find the fluxions: and vice versa".^[5]

Example

If the fluent ${\displaystyle y}$ is defined as ${\displaystyle y=t^{2))$ (where ${\displaystyle t}$ is time) the fluxion (derivative) at ${\displaystyle t=2}$ is:

${\displaystyle {\dot {y))={\frac {\Delta y}{\Delta t))={\frac {(2+o)^{2}-2^{2)){(2+o)-2))={\frac {4+4o+o^{2}-4}{2+o-2))={\frac {4o+o^{2)){o))}$

Here ${\displaystyle o}$ is an infinitely small amount of time.^[6] So, the term ${\displaystyle o^{2))$ is second order infinite small term and according to Newton, we can now ignore ${\displaystyle o^{2))$ because of its second order infinite smallness comparing to first order infinite smallness of ${\displaystyle o}$.^[7] So, the final equation gets the form:

${\displaystyle {\dot {y))={\frac {\Delta y}{\Delta t))={\frac {4o}{o))=4}$

He justified the use of ${\displaystyle o}$ as a non-zero quantity by stating that fluxions were a consequence of movement by an object.

Criticism

Bishop George Berkeley, a prominent philosopher of the time, denounced Newton's fluxions in his essay The Analyst, published in 1734.^[8] Berkeley refused to believe that they were accurate because of the use of the infinitesimal ${\displaystyle o}$. He did not believe it could be ignored and pointed out that if it was zero, the consequence would be division by zero. Berkeley referred to them as "ghosts of departed quantities", a statement which unnerved mathematicians of the time and led to the eventual disuse of infinitesimals in calculus.

Towards the end of his life Newton revised his interpretation of ${\displaystyle o}$ as infinitely small, preferring to define it as approaching zero, using a similar definition to the concept of limit.^[9] He believed this put fluxions back on safe ground. By this time, Leibniz's derivative (and his notation) had largely replaced Newton's fluxions and fluents, and remains in use today.