Quiz Show
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRobert Redford
Screenplay byPaul Attanasio
Based onRemembering America
by Richard Goodwin
Produced byRobert Redford
Michael Jacobs
Julian Krainin
Michael Nozik
CinematographyMichael Ballhaus
Edited byStu Linder
Music byMark Isham
Distributed byBuena Vista Pictures Distribution
Release date
  • September 14, 1994 (1994-09-14) (New York City[1])
Running time
133 minutes
CountryUnited States
Budget$31 million[2]
Box office$52.2 million

Quiz Show is a 1994 American historical mystery-drama film[3][4] directed and produced by Robert Redford. Dramatizing the Twenty-One quiz show scandals of the 1950s, the screenplay by Paul Attanasio[5] adapts the memoirs of Richard N. Goodwin, a U.S. Congressional lawyer who investigated the accusations of game-fixing by show producers.[6] The film chronicles the rise and fall of popular contestant Charles Van Doren after the fixed loss of Herb Stempel and Goodwin's subsequent probe.

The film stars John Turturro as Stempel, Rob Morrow as Goodwin, and Ralph Fiennes as Charles Van Doren. Paul Scofield, David Paymer, Hank Azaria, Martin Scorsese, Mira Sorvino, and Christopher McDonald play supporting roles.[5][7][8] The real Goodwin and Stempel served as technical advisors to the production.

The film received generally positive reviews and was nominated for several awards, including a Best Picture Oscar nomination and several Golden Globe Awards.


In 1958, the questions and answers to be used for the latest broadcast of NBC's popular quiz show Twenty-One are transported from a secure bank vault to the studio. The evening's main attraction is Queens resident Herb Stempel, the reigning champion, who correctly answers question after question. Eventually, both the network and the program's corporate sponsor, the supplementary tonic Geritol, begin to fear that Stempel's approval ratings are beginning to level out, and decide that the show would benefit from new talent.

Producers Dan Enright and Albert Freedman are surprised when Columbia University instructor Charles Van Doren, son of a prominent literary family, visits their office to audition for a different, less difficult show by the same producers, Tic-Tac-Dough. Realizing that they have found an ideal challenger for Stempel, they offer to ask the same questions during the show which Van Doren correctly answered during his audition. He refuses, but when he comes within reach of a game-winning 21 points on the show, he is asked one of the questions from his audition. After a moment of moral indecision, he gives the correct answer. Stempel deliberately misses an easy question and loses, having been promised a future in television if he does so.

In the weeks that follow, Van Doren's winning streak makes him a national celebrity, but he reluctantly buckles under the pressure and allows Enright and Freedman to start giving him the answers. Meanwhile, Stempel, having lost his prize money to an unscrupulous bookie, begins threatening legal action against NBC after weeks go by without his return to television. He visits New York County District Attorney Frank Hogan, who convenes a grand jury to look into his allegations.

Richard Goodwin, a young Congressional lawyer, learns that the grand jury findings have been sealed and travels to New York City to investigate rumors of rigged quiz shows. Visiting a number of contestants, including Stempel and Van Doren, he begins to suspect that Twenty-One is a fixed operation. Stempel's volatile personality damages his credibility, and nobody else seems willing to confirm that the show is fixed. Fearing Goodwin will give up the investigation, Stempel confesses that he was fed the correct answers during his run on the show, and insists that Van Doren must have been involved as well. Another former contestant gives Goodwin a set of answers that he mailed to himself two days before his quiz show appearance, which Goodwin takes to be corroborating evidence.

A guilt-ridden Van Doren deliberately loses, but NBC offers him a lucrative contract to appear as a special correspondent on the morning Today show. The House Committee for Legislative Oversight convenes a hearing, at which Goodwin presents his evidence of the quiz show's corruption. Stempel testifies at the hearing but fails to convince the committee, and both NBC network head Robert Kintner and Geritol executive Martin Rittenhome deny any knowledge of Twenty-One being rigged. Subpoenaed by Goodwin, Van Doren testifies before the committee and admits his role in the deception. After the hearing adjourns, he learns from reporters that he has been fired from Today and that Columbia's board of trustees is going to ask for his resignation.

Goodwin believes that he is on the verge of a victory against Geritol and NBC, but realizes that Enright and Freedman will not jeopardize their own futures in television by turning against their bosses. He silently watches the producers' testimony, vindicating the sponsors and the network from any wrongdoing, and taking full responsibility for rigging the show. Disgusted, he steps outside and sees Van Doren, who waves at him before boarding a taxi.


Historical accuracy

Although a majority of Quiz Show is accurate to the real-life events its based on,[9][10] it had enough artistic licenses to stir up controversy and criticism (especially towards character changes) by critics and real-life figures of the scandal.[11]

The artistic licenses included telescoping three years of scandal into one,[12] changing the location of Van Doren's first meeting with Goodwin (it was at NBC in real life), altering the start time of Goodwin's investigation (in reality, it was after Van Doren's last game), and making Van Doren's choice of mis-answering a question his own instead of NBC's.[9] "A protracted dance of denial and disclosure is transformed into a fast-paced detective story," categorized Tom Dunkel.[3]

The film's magnification of the role Twenty-One and its producer, Albert Freedman, had in the scandal was criticized by Jeff Kisslehoff, who wrote The Box: An Oral History of Television, 1920-1961, and the real-life Freedman; Kisslehoff reasoned that the cheating of contestants on 1950s game shows was brought from the radio era where players were overtly coached.[3] Goodwin also had a lesser importance in the investigation than portrayed in the film; he was involved two years after Twenty-One ended syndication, and put the pieces together, whereas collection of information was handled by publications and assistant district attorneys in New York City.[3] Joe Stone, a congressional committee consultant who investigated the scandal for four years, was angered not only by the screenplay's spotlight on Goodwin but also that, as of the film's release, he took most of the credit for uncovering the scandal; Goodwin's wife, Doris Kearns Goodwin, apologized to Stone about the film via telephone.[3]

For legal reasons, alterations had to be made to Matthew Rosenhaus, the CEO of the company that owned Geritol, J.B. Williams Co.; his name was changed to Martin Rittenhome, and his personality reflected that of Charles Revson, who was the president of cosmetics brand Revlon that sponsored another quiz show that was a part of the scandal, The $64,000 Question (1955–1958).[13] While Stempel's wife Toby is unaware of the hackery behind Twenty-One in the film, she and her family knew about it in reality and told him to "take the money and run."[3]

Some dramatic liberties involved simplifications, such as with the character of Charles Van Doren, who is a "shallow icon" devoid of the ambiguities his real-world counterpart had, Chicago Reader analyzed.[14] In a July 2008 edition of The New Yorker, Van Doren wrote about the events depicted in the film. He agreed with many of the details. But he also said that he had a regular girlfriend (his future wife) at the time he was on Twenty-One, and that she was not present in the film depiction. Van Doren also noted that he continued teaching, contrary to the film's epilogue which stated he never returned to doing so.[15]



When Robert Redford first saw Twenty-One in the late 1950s, he was in his early 20s taking art and acting classes in New York City, the same city in which Rockefeller Center, the show's studio, was located.[16] He recalled when he first saw Charles Van Doren on the show, "Watching him and the other contestants was irresistible. The actor in me looked at the show and felt I was watching other actors. It was too much to believe, but at the same time, I never doubted the show. I hadn't had evidence television could trick us. But the merchant mentality was already taking hold, and as we know now, there's little morality there."[17] The filmmaker described the scandal as "really the first in a series of scandals . . . that have left us numbed, unsure of what or who to believe."[16]

There had already been a documentary on the scandal, the Julian Krainin-produced work for a 1992 installment of the PBS series The American Experience.[12]


Quiz Show is based on a chapter of the book Remembering America: A Voice From the Sixties (1988) by Richard N. Goodwin,[16] who also was one of the film's many producers.[18] Paul Attanasio began writing the screenplay in 1990, who joined immediately for the subject matter's "complex ironies," such as with its main characters.[19] Going through over a dozen drafts over the course of three years, Attanasio wrote the script by watching clips of Twenty-One, reading old publication articles about the scandal and its people, getting a sense of the 1950s television landscape at the Museum of Broadcasting, and having meetings with Goodwin.[18][20] Redford researched the topic himself by reading Dan Wakefield's book New York in the Fifties, and had the author be on set to ask him questions and give him a cameo appearance.[21] Redford personally knew Goodwin since acting in The Candidate (1972), and helped Attanasio integrate the investigator's real-life personality.[22]

Because the story lacked a protagonist, Attanasio had to work with using a novel-based technique of "shifting points of view" while keeping a through line usual for films, which made writing the screenplay difficult.[23] In depicting the themes of ethnic conflict between White Anglo-Saxon Protestants and Jewish characters, Attanasio borrowed from his experiences of being raised in a family with an Italian background; his relatives were outraged by the stereotypical depiction of Italians as loudmouth gangsters in the media, and, like other Bronx Italians, held negative viewpoints towards Brooklyn Italians.[18] He also used the personality of those he worked with in the film industry, "killers" hiding behind nice attitudes, for incorporating themes of disillusion.[18]


Redford first read a rough draft after completing production of A River Runs Through It (1992), "looking for something edgier, faster-paced, urban, where I could move the camera more."[16] Barry Levinson's Baltimore Pictures and TriStar Pictures began development of a film project based on the quiz show scandal, which was tough to sell due to its non-commercial style and subject matter; TriStar placed it in turnaround in September 1992, only for it to be moved to Disney. They backed $20 million into the budget and launched it into production in spring 1993 after Redford, whose most recent success was A River Runs Through It, came on board as director.[17] Although Disney offered Charles Van Doren $100,000 to be a consultant on the film, he declined.[24]


Casting took place in New York in May 1993.[25] He originally planned an American actor to play Charles Van Doren, but after auditioning several, including William Baldwin,[25] he couldn't find the "combination of elements" required for the character in any of them and went with the British Ralph Fiennes.[16] For the role, Fiennes not only viewed clips of Van Doren on Twenty-One as well as interviews with him, he also went to the real-life Van Doren's Cornwall, Connecticut home;[17] although there never was a full meeting between the two, Fiennes did get a sense of atmosphere of Van Doren's home as well as asked him directions from a distance to get an idea for his voice.[26] An American actor, Paul Newman, was also initially considered for Mark Van Doren, but he declined.[16] Chris O'Donnell was reported in a May 1993 Variety article having talks with Redford about appearing in Quiz Show, although he ultimately wasn't cast.[27]

Turturro, who himself had felt like an outsider, had an easy time getting into the character of a Jewish outcast like Stempel; however, he still altered himself to fit the character, gaining 25 pounds and training to mimic Stempel's high-pitched voice.[26] After breaking through by playing the top-billed role in Northern Exposure (1990–1995), Morrow was offered several film roles but rejected all of them in looking for the right one to play; this was until he accepted the offer for Quiz Show: "I knew this was the one. It had the cachet of Bob Redford and was incredibly well-written." In getting the idea of the character of Goodwin, Morrow read four of his books.[28]

Levinson was originally attached to the project as director, but because he had to film Bugsy (1991), his position was replaced by Redford.[29] However, Levinson was then cast by Redford for the part of Dave Garroway, as Redford liked his "easygoing, casual manner" and interest in 1950s culture.[13] For the scene involving J. Fred Muggs, they had to use a chimp "unnerved by the lights and cameras" as no creatures trained for film production were available.[13] Martin Scorsese was cast by Redford not only for his physical features, but also for "his own personal style and delivery, so I found it interesting to have him play a tough character gently. And given his delivery style, in which he talks real fast, I thought it would make the character extremely menacing."[13]


Quiz Show is a Faustian tale[30] about the loss of innocence (both for its three main characters and the entire country),[18] temptation with money,[31] moral ambiguity,[10] positive guises hiding otherwise bad-faith actions,[10] the cult of celebrity,[31] the negative side effects of fame,[31] the power and corruption of big business and mass media,[31][32] the consequences of over-competitiveness in business,[33] racial, ethnic, and class conflict,[7][14][34] and the discord between education and entertainment.[31] Attanasio, Redford, and most film critics considered Quiz Show's subject matter to be essential, as it marked the beginning of the country's loss of innocence and faith in its trusted institutions that was exacerbated by events like the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal, and more.[18][26][30][35][36]

Reviews from TV Guide and Newsweek noted that in the era of the film's release, scandals and culturally-unacceptable behaviors were more expected and less shocking to the American public than they were in the 1950s, when the long-time myth of American innocence dominated the nation;[7][37] it was to the point where controversial figures were even rewarded, as Newsweek claimed: "Neck high in '90s cynicism, it's hard to believe the tremors these scandals provoked. [...] In the '50s, Ingrid Bergman was blacklisted from Hollywood for having a baby out of wedlock. Today, Oliver North makes hash of the Constitution and it jump-starts his political career. What used to ruin your life gets you invited on "Oprah" and a fat book deal. Shame is for losers; public confession and a 12-step program can turn you into a role model."[7]


Although Quiz Show was ultimately released in September 1994, reports from late 1993 indicated that the film was originally planned to be distributed sometime in the year's first half.[38]

With Quiz Show, Buena Vista Pictures took on a platform release strategy where it garnered buzz by being released in a limited number of theaters before opening wider; one other film released that same non-competitive fall, The Shawshank Redemption (1994), was distributed in a similar manner, and both it and Quiz Show were box office failures.[39] It opened in New York City on September 14, 1994, and expanded to 27 screens for the weekend, grossing $757,714, the fifth-highest-grossing opening weekend on under 50 screens of all time.[1][40] It grossed $792,366 in its first 5 days.[41] The film gradually expanded over the next four weeks to a maximum of 822 screens and grossed a total of $24,822,619 in the United States and Canada.[42] 8 million (US/Canada)[42] In the United States, the film continued to drop in performance even after its Academy Award nominations, where it fell 63% in weekly grosses for the week of March 12, 1995.[43]

Following its theatrical run, Quiz Show ran out-of-competition at international festivals, such as the 1995 Berlin International Film Festival[44] and that same year's China edition of the Sundance Film Festival, which ran from October 5 to 12, 1995.[45] Five weeks prior to the Berlin festival, Redford told Buena Vista he couldn't attend, which was due to the filming of Up Close and Personal (1996) and going to the 1995 Sundance Film Festival filling up his schedule; however, according to festival director Moritz de Hadeln, Berlin nonetheless made a deal with the distributor to promote Quiz Show with the requirement that Redford be present. His non-attendance resulted in erosion of his relationship with Buena Vista and other film festival organizers, as well as less promotion for the film's international release.[46]

In countries internationally, such as in Germany and France, Quiz Show generally performed far better in big cities than in smaller towns and had more female attendees than male. In Italy, despite much press and interest in the film's subject matter, it wasn't a commercial success due to motion pictures with even a hint of a negative tone generally not appealing to the country's audiences. The best international performance was in Spain, where it grossed $368,000 within six days of a 31-screen run.[47] The film grossed an international total of $1.4 million by February 12, 1995, more than a month before the Oscar ceremony.[48] It finally grossed $27.4 million internationally for a worldwide total of $52.2 million.[49][50]

Critical reception

Quiz Show currently holds a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 56 reviews, with an average rating of 8.2/10. The site's consensus states: "Robert Redford refracts the sociopolitical and moral issues posed by the subject material through a purely entertaining, well-acted lens."[51] Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film 3½ stars out of four, calling the screenplay "smart, subtle and ruthless."[52] Web critic James Berardinelli praised the "superb performances by Fiennes", and said "John Turturro is exceptional as the uncharismatic Herbie Stempel."[53] Writing for Entertainment Weekly, Owen Gleiberman highlighted the supporting performance of Paul Scofield as Mark Van Doren, stating that "it's in the relationship between the two Van Dorens that Quiz Show finds its soul."[54]

Kenneth Turan called Scofield's performance his best since A Man for All Seasons (1966), and suggested the film "would have been a very different experience" without Fiennes' "ability to project the pain behind a well-mannered facade, to turn intellectual and emotional agony into a real and living thing.[10] However, he also was a bit more critical towards the exaggerated performances of Turturro and Morrow.[10]

Charles Van Doren said, "I understand that movies need to compress and conflate, but what bothered me most was the epilogue stating that I never taught again. I didn't stop teaching, although it was a long time before I taught again in a college. I did enjoy John Turturro's version of Stempel. And I couldn't help but laugh when Stempel referred to me in the film as 'Charles Van Fucking Moron.'"[55]

Year-end lists


Award Category Nominee Result
20/20 Award[104] Best Picture Quiz Show Nominated
Best Director Robert Redford Nominated
Best Supporting Actor Paul Scofield Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay Paul Attanasio Nominated
Best Art Direction Jon Hutman Nominated
Academy Award[105] Best Picture Robert Redford, Michael Jacobs, Julian Kranin and Michael Nozik Nominated
Best Director Robert Redford Nominated
Best Actor in a Supporting Role Paul Scofield Nominated
Best Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published Paul Attanasio Nominated
Awards Circuit Community Awards[106] Best Achievement in Directing Robert Redford Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay Paul Scofield Nominated
Boston Society of Film Critics Award[107] Best Director Robert Redford Runner-up
British Academy Film Award[108][109] Best Film Robert Redford Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay Paul Attanasio Won
Best Supporting Actor Paul Scofield Nominated
Directors Guild of America Award[110] Outstanding Directing — Feature Film Robert Redford Nominated
Golden Globe Award[111] Best Motion Picture – Drama Robert Redford Nominated
Best Director Robert Redford Nominated
Best Supporting Actor John Turturro Nominated
Best Screenplay Paul Attanasio Nominated
Golden Laurel Award[112] Outstanding Producer of Theatrical Motion Pictures Robert Redford, Michael Jacobs, Julien Krainin, Michael Nozik Nominated
National Society of Film Critics[113] Best Supporting Actor Paul Scofield 3rd place
Best Screenplay Paul Attanasio Runner-up
New York Film Critics Circle[114][115] Best Film Quiz Show Won
Best Supporting Actor Paul Scofield Runner-up
Best Screenplay Paul Attanasio Runner-up
Screen Actors Guild Award[116] Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role John Turturro Nominated

Paul Scofield was also nominated for the Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actor, the National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Supporting Actor, and the New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Supporting Actor.

John Turturro was also nominated for the Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actor.



  1. ^ a b "All-Time Opening Weekends: 50 Screens or Less". Daily Variety. September 20, 1994. p. 24.
  2. ^ Box Office Information for Quiz Show. The Wrap. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Dunkel, Tom (September 27, 1994). "The Man with All the Answers". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  4. ^ "AFI|Catalog". catalog.afi.com. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  5. ^ a b "Quiz Show". Turner Classic Movies. Atlanta: Turner Broadcasting System (Time Warner). Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  6. ^ Goodwin, Richard N. (2014). Remembering America: A Voice from the Sixties (Paperback ed.). New York City: Open Road Integrated Media. ISBN 978-1497676572.
  7. ^ a b c d David Ansen (September 18, 1994). "When America Lost Its Innocence--Maybe". Newsweek.
  8. ^ Maslin, Janet (September 14, 1994). "QUIZ SHOW; Good and Evil in a More Innocent Age". The New York Times.
  9. ^ a b von Tunzelmann, Alex (December 14, 2012). "Quiz Show: Robert Redford's film gets all the answers right". The Guardian. Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  10. ^ a b c d e Turan, Kenneth (September 16, 1994). "Movie Review : 'Quiz Show's' Category: Evil and Moral Ambiguity". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 11, 2020.
  11. ^ Greenfield, Meg (October 17, 1994). "The Quiz Show Scandals". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  12. ^ a b Auletta, Ken (September 19, 1994). "The $64,000 Question". The New Yorker. p. 48.
  13. ^ a b c d Eller, Claudia (August 7, 1994). "They're Naturals for 'Quiz Show'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  14. ^ a b Rosenbaum, Jonathan. "Quiz Show". Chicago Reader. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  15. ^ Van Doren, Charles (July 28, 2008). "All The Answers". The New Yorker. Retrieved May 8, 2013.
  16. ^ a b c d e f Gelmis, Joseph (September 13, 1994). "An Icon With a Few Questions : Robert Redford's Personal Films Examine America's Merchant Mentality". Newsday. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  17. ^ a b c Hruska, Bronwen (August 28, 1994). "They Conned America". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  18. ^ a b c d e f Weinraub, Bernard (September 12, 1994). "Flawed Characters In the Public Eye, Past and Present". The New York Times. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  19. ^ Rose 1994, 1:24–2:19.
  20. ^ Rose 1994, 3:25–3:58.
  21. ^ Wakefield, Dan (August 21, 1994). "His 50s, Then and Now.; Robert Redford". The New York Times. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  22. ^ Rose 1994, 4:59–5:17.
  23. ^ Rose 1994, 2:37–3:16.
  24. ^ Johnson, Ted (July 21, 2008). "Blast from the Past". Variety. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  25. ^ a b "Entertainment news for May 14, 1993". Entertainment Weekly. May 14, 1993. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  26. ^ a b c Cawley, Janet (September 4, 1994). "Innocence was the Big Loser". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  27. ^ Archerd, Army (May 6, 1993). "AMC sure it can lure out couch potatoes". Variety. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  28. ^ Koltnow, Barry (September 23, 1994). "Rob Morrow Trades TV for Big-Screen Exposure". Orange County Register. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  29. ^ Rose 1994, 5:43–5:52.
  30. ^ a b "Time Out". Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  31. ^ a b c d e Newman, Kim (1995). "Quiz Show Review". Empire. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  32. ^ Wilmington, Michael (September 16, 1994). "Tarnishing the Golden Age". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  33. ^ Siskel, Gene (September 16, 1994). "Redford's 'Quiz Show' Raises All the Right Questions". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  34. ^ Levy, Emanuel (July 27, 2007). "Quiz Show (1994): Redford's Compelling Drama of TV Twenty-One Scandal, Starring Ralph Fiennes". EmanuelLevy.com. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  35. ^ Royko, Mike (September 23, 1994). "Movie Critics' View from Isolation Booth". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  36. ^ Stack, Peter (April 21, 1995). "Dark Days of a TV 'Quiz Show'". The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  37. ^ "Quiz Show". TV Guide. Archived from the original on October 29, 2000. Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  38. ^ Dutka, Elaine (October 7, 1993). "Levinson on Hollywood: The People on the Fringe". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  39. ^ "Studios Ponder Perils, Payoffs Of Platforming". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  40. ^ Quiz Show at the American Film Institute Catalog
  41. ^ "Film Box Office Report". Daily Variety. September 20, 1994. p. 8.
  42. ^ a b "Quiz Show (1994)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2010-07-28.
  43. ^ "Full 'House' 'Bunch' Slips 'Just' OK". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  44. ^ Molner, David (January 22, 1995). "Berlin Boasts 19 World Bows". Variety. Retrieved July 17, 2020.
  45. ^ "China opens its doors to Sundance fest". Variety. October 9, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  46. ^ Molner, David (February 19, 1995). "'Kiss' Seduces Berlin, Stirring Sluggish Mood". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  47. ^ Groves, Dan (February 26, 1995). "'Quiz' Shows Spotty B.O. Overseas". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  48. ^ "O'seas B.O. Is 'Terminal'". Variety. February 12, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  49. ^ "Worldwide rentals beat domestic take". Variety. February 13, 1995. p. 28. =International gross 1994: $1.5m
  50. ^ Klady, Leonard (February 19, 1996). "B.O. with a vengeance: $9.1 billion worldwide". Variety. p. 1. International gross 1995: $25.9m
  51. ^ "Quiz Show, Rotten Tomatoes". Rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved 2023-01-25.
  52. ^ Roger Ebert. "Quiz Show". September 16, 1994.
  53. ^ James Berardinelli. "Quiz Show". ReelViews.
  54. ^ Owen Gleiberman. "Quiz Show", Entertainment Weekly.
  55. ^ Van Doren, Charles (July 28, 2008). "All the Answers". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on June 8, 2021.
  56. ^ Vadeboncoeur, Joan (January 8, 1995). "Critically Acclaimed Best Movies of '94 Include Works from Tarantino, Burton, Demme, Redford, Disney and Speilberg". Syracuse Herald American (Final ed.). p. 16.
  57. ^ Hurley, John (December 30, 1994). "Movie Industry Hit Highs and Lows in '94". Staten Island Advance. p. D11.
  58. ^ Travers, Peter (December 29, 1994). "The Best and Worst Movies of 1994". Rolling Stone. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  59. ^ P. Means, Sean (January 1, 1995). "'Pulp and Circumstance' After the Rise of Quentin Tarantino, Hollywood Would Never Be the Same". The Salt Lake Tribune (Final ed.). p. E1.
  60. ^ Kopp, Craig (December 29, 1994). "OUR CRITIC'S PICKS '94's winners: from 'Clerks' to 'Pulp Fiction'". The Cincinnati Post (Metro ed.). p. 3.
  61. ^ Lawson, Terry (December 25, 1994). "UNKNOWN QUALITIES Best Yet to Come Among Years Top 10 Movies". Dayton Daily News (City ed.). p. 3C.
  62. ^ Denerstein, Robert (January 1, 1995). "Perhaps It Was Best to Simply Fade to Black". Rocky Mountain News (Final ed.). p. 61A.
  63. ^ Schuldt, Scott (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Rank Their Favorites for the Year Without a Doubt, Blue Ribbon Goes to "Pulp Fiction," Scott Says". The Oklahoman. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  64. ^ "Awards for 1994". National Board of Review. Archived from the original on November 25, 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  65. ^ Turan, Kenneth (December 25, 1994). "1994: YEAR IN REVIEW : No Weddings, No Lions, No Gumps". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  66. ^ Maslin, Janet (December 27, 1994). "CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; The Good, Bad and In-Between In a Year of Surprises on Film". The New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  67. ^ Howe, Desson (December 30, 1994), "The Envelope Please: Reel Winners and Losers of 1994", The Washington Post, retrieved July 19, 2020
  68. ^ Hunter, Stephen (December 25, 1994). "Films worthy of the title 'best' in short supply MOVIES". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  69. ^ Stupich, David (January 19, 1995). "Even with gore, 'Pulp Fiction' was film experience of the year". The Milwaukee Journal. p. 3.
  70. ^ Mills, Michael (December 30, 1994). "It's a Fact: 'Pulp Fiction' Year's Best". The Palm Beach Post (Final ed.). p. 7.
  71. ^ Davis, Sandi (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Rank Their Favorites for the Year "Forrest Gump" The Very Best, Sandi Declares". The Oklahoman. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  72. ^ Vincent, Mal (January 7, 1995). "Mal's 10 Best Movies of '94". The Virginian-Pilot (Final ed.). p. E1.
  73. ^ Persall, Steve (December 30, 1994). "Fiction': The art of filmmaking". St. Petersburg Times (City ed.). p. 8.
  74. ^ Sheid, Christopher (December 30, 1994). "A year in review: Movies". The Munster Times.
  75. ^ Siskel, Gene (December 25, 1994). "The Year's Best Movies". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  76. ^ MacCambridge, Michael (December 22, 1994). "it's a LOVE-HATE thing". Austin American-Statesman (Final ed.). p. 38.
  77. ^ Strauss, Bob (December 30, 1994). "At the Movies: Quantity Over Quality". Los Angeles Daily News (Valley ed.). p. L6.
  78. ^ Armstrong, Douglas (January 1, 1995). "End-of-year slump is not a happy ending". The Milwaukee Journal. p. 2.
  79. ^ Roberts, Jerry (December 30, 1994). "What kind of a movie year was it? It was mainly the pits Tom Hanks played "Forrest Gump" in one of the year's best". Daily Breeze. p. K12.
  80. ^ Rahr, David (December 30, 1994). "Tarantino Top's Rahr's List". The Santa Fe New Mexican. p. 37.
  81. ^ Bates, Mack (January 19, 1995). "Originality of 'Hoop Dreams' makes it the movie of the year". The Milwaukee Journal. p. 3.
  82. ^ Ebert, Roger (December 31, 1994). "The Best 10 Movies of 1994". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  83. ^ Berardinelli, James (January 2, 1995). "Rewinding 1994 -- The Year in Film". ReelViews. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  84. ^ Dudek, Duane (December 30, 1994). "1994 was a year of slim pickings". Milwaukee Sentinel. p. 3.
  85. ^ Webster, Dan (January 1, 1995). "In Year of Disappointments, Some Movies Still Delivered". The Spokesman-Review (Spokane ed.). p. 2.
  86. ^ Clark, Mike (December 28, 1994). "Scoring with true life, 'True Lies' and 'Fiction.'". USA Today (Final ed.). p. 5D.
  87. ^ Arnold, William (December 30, 1994). "'94 Movies: Best and Worst". Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Final ed.). p. 20.
  88. ^ Zoller Seitz, Matt (January 12, 1995). "Personal best From a year full of startling and memorable movies, here are our favorites". Dallas Observer.
  89. ^ a b "The Year's Best". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. December 25, 1994. p. K/1.
  90. ^ Simon, Jeff (January 1, 1995). "Movies: Once More, with Feeling". The Buffalo News. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  91. ^ Ross, Bob (December 30, 1994). "1994 The Year in Entertainment". The Tampa Tribune (Final ed.). p. 18.
  92. ^ Harrison, Eric (January 8, 1995). "Movie Magic". Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. p. 1E.
  93. ^ Mayo, Mike (December 30, 1994). "The Hits and Misses at the Movies in '94". The Roanoke Times (Metro ed.). p. 1.
  94. ^ Pickle, Betsy (December 30, 1994). "Searching for the Top 10... Whenever They May Be". Knoxville News-Sentinel. p. 3.
  95. ^ Carlton, Bob (December 29, 1994). "It Was a Good Year at Movies". The Birmingham News. p. 12-01.
  96. ^ Delmont, Jim; Minge, Jim (December 30, 1994). "A Critical Look Back 'Gump,' 'Little Women' Among Top Films of '94 Can You Still See Them?". Omaha World-Herald (Sunrise ed.). p. 31sf.
  97. ^ Movshovitz, Howie (December 25, 1994). "Memorable Movies of '94 Independents, fringes filled out a lean year". The Denver Post (Rockies ed.). p. E-1.
  98. ^ Meyer, George (December 30, 1994). "The Year of the Middling Movie". The Ledger. p. 6TO.
  99. ^ Arnold, Gary (January 1, 1995). "Film". The Washington Times (2 ed.). p. D3.
  100. ^ Craft, Dan (December 30, 1994). "Success, Failure and a Lot of In-between; Movies '94". The Pantagraph. p. B1.
  101. ^ Lovell, Glenn (December 25, 1994). "The Past Picture Show the Good, the Bad and the Ugly -- a Year Worth's of Movie Memories". San Jose Mercury News (Morning Final ed.). p. 3.
  102. ^ King, Dennis (December 25, 1994). "SCREEN SAVERS In a Year of Faulty Epics, The Oddest Little Movies Made The Biggest Impact". Tulsa World (Final Home ed.). p. E1.
  103. ^ Elliott, David (December 25, 1994). "On the big screen, color it a satisfying time". The San Diego Union-Tribune (1, 2 ed.). p. E=8.
  104. ^ "2015 Nominees – 6th Annual 20/20 Awards". 20/20 Awards. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  105. ^ "The 67th Academy Awards (1994) Nominees and Winners". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
  106. ^ "ACCA 1994". Awards Circuit. 2014. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  107. ^ Carr, Jay (December 19, 1994). "Boston critics pick 'Pulp' as top film". The Boston Globe. p. 59.
  108. ^ Dawtrey, Adam (February 19, 1995). "'Weddings' Waltzes With 11 BAFTA Noms". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  109. ^ "British film & TV acad toasts 'Weddings' with five nods". Variety. May 1, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  110. ^ Cox, Dan (January 29, 1995). "New Faces, Practiced Hands". Variety. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  111. ^ "Quiz Show". Golden Globe Awards. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  112. ^ "PGA Film Noms Mirror DGA Pix". Variety. January 29, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  113. ^ Carr, Jay (January 5, 1995). "'Pulp Fiction' Wins Critics' Nod". Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Final ed.). p. C5.
  114. ^ Maslin, Janet (December 16, 1994). "Critics Honor 'Pulp Fiction' And 'Quiz Show'". The New York Times. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  115. ^ "New York Film Critics Circle – Year 1994". FilmAffinity. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  116. ^ "The Inaugural Screen Actors Guild Awards". SAG Awards. Retrieved July 18, 2020.