Social network analysis (SNA) is the process of investigating social structures through the use of networks and graph theory.[1] It characterizes networked structures in terms of nodes (individual actors, people, or things within the network) and the ties, edges, or links (relationships or interactions) that connect them. Examples of social structures commonly visualized through social network analysis include social media networks,[2][3]meme spread,[4] information circulation,[5]friendship and acquaintance networks, peer learner networks,[6] business networks, knowledge networks,[7][8] difficult working relationships,[9]collaboration graphs, kinship, disease transmission, and sexual relationships.[10][11] These networks are often visualized through sociograms in which nodes are represented as points and ties are represented as lines. These visualizations provide a means of qualitatively assessing networks by varying the visual representation of their nodes and edges to reflect attributes of interest.[12]
The advantages of SNA are twofold. Firstly, it can process a large amount of relational data and describe the overall relational network structure. tem and parameter selection to confirm the influential nodes in the network, such as in-degree and out-degree centrality. SNA context and choose which parameters to define the “center” according to the characteristics of the network. Through analyzing nodes, clusters and relations, the communication structure and position of individuals can be clearly described.[23]
History
Social network analysis has its theoretical roots in the work of early sociologists such as Georg Simmel and Émile Durkheim, who wrote about the importance of studying patterns of relationships that connect social actors. Social scientists have used the concept of "social networks" since early in the 20th century to connote complex sets of relationships between members of social systems at all scales, from interpersonal to international.[24]
In the 1930s Jacob Moreno and Helen Jennings introduced basic analytical methods.[24] In 1954, John Arundel Barnes started using the term systematically to denote patterns of ties, encompassing concepts traditionally used by the public and those used by social scientists: bounded groups (e.g., tribes, families) and social categories (e.g., gender, ethnicity).
Beginning in the late 1990s, social network analysis experienced a further resurgence with work by sociologists, political scientists, economists, computer scientists, and physicists such as Duncan J. Watts, Albert-László Barabási, Peter Bearman, Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler, Mark Newman, Matthew Jackson, Jon Kleinberg, and others, developing and applying new models and methods, prompted in part by the emergence of new data available about online social networks as well as "digital traces" regarding face-to-face networks.
Computational SNA has been extensively used in research on study-abroad second language acquisition.[26][6][27] Even in the study of literature, network analysis has been applied by Anheier, Gerhards and Romo,[28] Wouter De Nooy,[29] and Burgert Senekal.[30] Indeed, social network analysis has found applications in various academic disciplines as well as practical contexts such as countering money laundering and terrorism.
Size: The number of network members in a given network.
Connections
Homophily: The extent to which actors form ties with similar versus dissimilar others. Similarity can be defined by gender, race, age, occupation, educational achievement, status, values or any other salient characteristic.[31] Homophily is also referred to as assortativity.
Multiplexity: The number of content-forms contained in a tie.[32] For example, two people who are friends and also work together would have a multiplexity of 2.[33] Multiplexity has been associated with relationship strength and can also comprise overlap of positive and negative network ties.[9]
Mutuality/Reciprocity: The extent to which two actors reciprocate each other's friendship or other interaction.[34]
Network Closure: A measure of the completeness of relational triads. An individual's assumption of network closure (i.e. that their friends are also friends) is called transitivity. Transitivity is an outcome of the individual or situational trait of Need for Cognitive Closure.[35]
Propinquity: The tendency for actors to have more ties with geographically close others.
Distributions
Bridge: An individual whose weak ties fill a structural hole, providing the only link between two individuals or clusters. It also includes the shortest route when a longer one is unfeasible due to a high risk of message distortion or delivery failure.[36]
Density: The proportion of direct ties in a network relative to the total number possible.[43][44]
Distance: The minimum number of ties required to connect two particular actors, as popularized by Stanley Milgram's small world experiment and the idea of 'six degrees of separation'.
Structural holes: The absence of ties between two parts of a network. Finding and exploiting a structural hole can give an entrepreneur a competitive advantage. This concept was developed by sociologist Ronald Burt, and is sometimes referred to as an alternate conception of social capital.
Tie Strength: Defined by the linear combination of time, emotional intensity, intimacy and reciprocity (i.e. mutuality).[36] Strong ties are associated with homophily, propinquity and transitivity, while weak ties are associated with bridges.
Segmentation
Groups are identified as 'cliques' if every individual is directly tied to every other individual, 'social circles' if there is less stringency of direct contact, which is imprecise, or as structurally cohesive blocks if precision is wanted.[45]
Clustering coefficient: A measure of the likelihood that two associates of a node are associates. A higher clustering coefficient indicates a greater 'cliquishness'.[46]
Cohesion: The degree to which actors are connected directly to each other by cohesive bonds. Structural cohesion refers to the minimum number of members who, if removed from a group, would disconnect the group.[47][48]
Modelling and visualization of networks
Different characteristics of social networks. A, B, and C show varying centrality and density of networks; panel D shows network closure, i.e., when two actors, tied to a common third actor, tend to also form a direct tie between them. Panel E represents two actors with different attributes (e.g., organizational affiliation, beliefs, gender, education) who tend to form ties. Panel F consists of two types of ties: friendship (solid line) and dislike (dashed line). In this case, two actors being friends both dislike a common third (or, similarly, two actors that dislike a common third tend to be friends).
Visual representation of social networks is important to understand the network data and convey the result of the analysis.[49] Numerous methods of visualization for data produced by social network analysis have been presented.[50][51][52] Many of the analytic software have modules for network visualization. Exploration of the data is done through displaying nodes and ties in various layouts, and attributing colors, size and other advanced properties to nodes. Visual representations of networks may be a powerful method for conveying complex information, but care should be taken in interpreting node and graph properties from visual displays alone, as they may misrepresent structural properties better captured through quantitative analyses.[53]
Signed graphs can be used to illustrate good and bad relationships between humans. A positive edge between two nodes denotes a positive relationship (friendship, alliance, dating) and a negative edge between two nodes denotes a negative relationship (hatred, anger). Signed social network graphs can be used to predict the future evolution of the graph. In signed social networks, there is the concept of "balanced" and "unbalanced" cycles. A balanced cycle is defined as a cycle where the product of all the signs are positive. According to balance theory, balanced graphs represent a group of people who are unlikely to change their opinions of the other people in the group. Unbalanced graphs represent a group of people who are very likely to change their opinions of the people in their group. For example, a group of 3 people (A, B, and C) where A and B have a positive relationship, B and C have a positive relationship, but C and A have a negative relationship is an unbalanced cycle. This group is very likely to morph into a balanced cycle, such as one where B only has a good relationship with A, and both A and B have a negative relationship with C. By using the concept of balanced and unbalanced cycles, the evolution of signed social network graphs can be predicted.[54]
Especially when using social network analysis as a tool for facilitating change, different approaches of participatory network mapping have proven useful. Here participants / interviewers provide network data by actually mapping out the network (with pen and paper or digitally) during the data collection session. An example of a pen-and-paper network mapping approach, which also includes the collection of some actor attributes (perceived influence and goals of actors) is the * Net-map toolbox. One benefit of this approach is that it allows researchers to collect qualitative data and ask clarifying questions while the network data is collected.[55]
Social Networking Potential (SNP) is a numeric coefficient, derived through algorithms[56][57] to represent both the size of an individual's social network and their ability to influence that network. SNP coefficients were first defined and used by Bob Gerstley in 2002. A closely related term is Alpha User, defined as a person with a high SNP.
SNP coefficients have two primary functions:
The classification of individuals based on their social networking potential, and
By calculating the SNP of respondents and by targeting High SNP respondents, the strength and relevance of quantitative marketing research used to drive viral marketing strategies is enhanced.
Variables used to calculate an individual's SNP include but are not limited to: participation in Social Networking activities, group memberships, leadership roles, recognition, publication/editing/contributing to non-electronic media, publication/editing/contributing to electronic media (websites, blogs), and frequency of past distribution of information within their network. The acronym "SNP" and some of the first algorithms developed to quantify an individual's social networking potential were described in the white paper "Advertising Research is Changing" (Gerstley, 2003) See Viral Marketing.[58]
The first book[59] to discuss the commercial use of Alpha Users among mobile telecoms audiences was 3G Marketing by Ahonen, Kasper and Melkko in 2004. The first book to discuss Alpha Users more generally in the context of social marketing intelligence was Communities Dominate Brands by Ahonen & Moore in 2005. In 2012, Nicola Greco (UCL) presents at TEDx the Social Networking Potential as a parallelism to the potential energy that users generate and companies should use, stating that "SNP is the new asset that every company should aim to have".[60]
Social network analysis is used extensively in a wide range of applications and disciplines. Some common network analysis applications include data aggregation and mining, network propagation modeling, network modeling and sampling, user attribute and behavior analysis, community-maintained resource support, location-based interaction analysis, social sharing and filtering, recommender systems development, and link prediction and entity resolution.[61] In the private sector, businesses use social network analysis to support activities such as customer interaction and analysis, information system development analysis,[62] marketing, and business intelligence needs (see social media analytics). Some public sector uses include development of leader engagement strategies, analysis of individual and group engagement and media use, and community-based problem solving.
Longitudinal SNA in schools
Large numbers of researchers worldwide examine the social networks of children and adolescents. In questionnaires, they list all classmates, students in the same grade, or schoolmates, asking: "who are your best friends?". Students may sometimes nominate as many peers as they wish; other times, the number of nominations is limited. Social network researchers have investigated similarities in friendship networks. The similarity between friends was established as far back as classical antiquity.[63] Resemblance is an important basis for the survival of friendships. Similarity in characteristics, attitudes, or behaviors means that friends understand each other more quickly, have common interests to talk about, know better where they stand with each other, and have more trust in each other.[64] As a result, such relationships are more stable and valuable. Moreover, looking more alike makes young people more confident and strengthens them in developing their identity.[65] Similarity in behavior can result from two processes: selection (birds of a feather flock together) and influence (one rotten apple spoils the barrel). These two processes can be distinguished using longitudinal social network analysis in the R package SIENA (Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analyses), developed by Tom Snijders and colleagues.[66] Longitudinal social network analysis became mainstream after the publication of a special issue of the Journal of Research on Adolescence in 2013, edited by René Veenstra and containing 15 empirical papers.[67]
Security applications
Social network analysis is also used in intelligence, counter-intelligence and law enforcement activities. This technique allows the analysts to map covert organizations such as an espionage ring, an organized crime family or a street gang. The National Security Agency (NSA) uses its electronic surveillance programs to generate the data needed to perform this type of analysis on terrorist cells and other networks deemed relevant to national security. The NSA looks up to three nodes deep during this network analysis.[68] After the initial mapping of the social network is complete, analysis is performed to determine the structure of the network and determine, for example, the leaders within the network.[69] This allows military or law enforcement assets to launch capture-or-kill decapitation attacks on the high-value targets in leadership positions to disrupt the functioning of the network.
The NSA has been performing social network analysis on call detail records (CDRs), also known as metadata, since shortly after the September 11 attacks.[70][71]
Textual analysis applications
Large textual corpora can be turned into networks and then analysed with the method of social network analysis. In these networks, the nodes are Social Actors, and the links are Actions. The extraction of these networks can be automated by using parsers. The resulting networks, which can contain thousands of nodes, are then analysed by using tools from network theory to identify the key actors, the key communities or parties, and general properties such as robustness or structural stability of the overall network, or centrality of certain nodes.[72] This automates the approach introduced by Quantitative Narrative Analysis,[73] whereby subject-verb-object triplets are identified with pairs of actors linked by an action, or pairs formed by actor-object.[74]
In other approaches, textual analysis is carried out considering the network of words co-occurring in a text. In these networks, nodes are words and links among them are weighted based on their frequency of co-occurrence (within a specific maximum range).
Internet applications
Social network analysis has also been applied to understanding online behavior by individuals, organizations, and between websites.[18]Hyperlink analysis can be used to analyze the connections between websites or webpages to examine how information flows as individuals navigate the web.[75] The connections between organizations has been analyzed via hyperlink analysis to examine which organizations within an issue community.[76]
Netocracy
Another concept that has emerged from this connection between social network theory and the Internet is the concept of netocracy, where several authors have emerged studying the correlation between the extended use of online social networks, and changes in social power dynamics.[77]
Social media internet applications
Social network analysis has been applied to social media as a tool to understand behavior between individuals or organizations through their linkages on social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook.[78]
In computer-supported collaborative learning
One of the most current methods of the application of SNA is to the study of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). When applied to CSCL, SNA is used to help understand how learners collaborate in terms of amount, frequency, and length, as well as the quality, topic, and strategies of communication.[79] Additionally, SNA can focus on specific aspects of the network connection, or the entire network as a whole. It uses graphical representations, written representations, and data representations to help examine the connections within a CSCL network.[79] When applying SNA to a CSCL environment the interactions of the participants are treated as a social network. The focus of the analysis is on the "connections" made among the participants – how they interact and communicate – as opposed to how each participant behaved on his or her own.
Key terms
There are several key terms associated with social network analysis research in computer-supported collaborative learning such as: density, centrality, indegree, outdegree, and sociogram.
Density refers to the "connections" between participants. Density is defined as the number of connections a participant has, divided by the total possible connections a participant could have. For example, if there are 20 people participating, each person could potentially connect to 19 other people. A density of 100% (19/19) is the greatest density in the system. A density of 5% indicates there is only 1 of 19 possible connections.[79]
Centrality focuses on the behavior of individual participants within a network. It measures the extent to which an individual interacts with other individuals in the network. The more an individual connects to others in a network, the greater their centrality in the network.[79][14]
In-degree and out-degree variables are related to centrality.
In-degree centrality concentrates on a specific individual as the point of focus; centrality of all other individuals is based on their relation to the focal point of the "in-degree" individual.[79]
Out-degree is a measure of centrality that still focuses on a single individual, but the analytic is concerned with the out-going interactions of the individual; the measure of out-degree centrality is how many times the focus point individual interacts with others.[79][14]
A sociogram is a visualization with defined boundaries of connections in the network. For example, a sociogram which shows out-degree centrality points for Participant A would illustrate all outgoing connections Participant A made in the studied network.[79]
Unique capabilities
Researchers employ social network analysis in the study of computer-supported collaborative learning in part due to the unique capabilities it offers. This particular method allows the study of interaction patterns within a networked learning community and can help illustrate the extent of the participants' interactions with the other members of the group.[79] The graphics created using SNA tools provide visualizations of the connections among participants and the strategies used to communicate within the group. Some authors also suggest that SNA provides a method of easily analyzing changes in participatory patterns of members over time.[80]
A number of research studies have applied SNA to CSCL across a variety of contexts. The findings include the correlation between a network's density and the teacher's presence,[79] a greater regard for the recommendations of "central" participants,[81] infrequency of cross-gender interaction in a network,[82] and the relatively small role played by an instructor in an asynchronous learning network.[83]
Benefits of SNA
There are two benefits of social network analysis. It may first characterize the overall topology of the relational network and analyze a significant amount of relational data. In terms of construction safety, the likelihood that an accident may spark a broad spectrum of public discourse increases with its severity. Through large data mining, social network analysis can display the vast network of all people taking part in public discourse as well as its internal organization. Since social network analysis places more emphasis on relationships than on separate people or organizations, this approach enables to look at the "two-way dialogue between the organization and the public." Second, SNA gives researchers the ability to choose parameters and a customizable measurement system to validate the network's influential nodes, including in-degree and out-degree centrality. SNA gives researchers the flexibility to select parameters based on the context of their study and define the "center" based on the properties of the network. It is possible to characterize the communication structure and individual positions by examining nodes, clusters, and relations.[84]
Other methods used alongside SNA
Although many studies have demonstrated the value of social network analysis within the computer-supported collaborative learning field,[79] researchers have suggested that SNA by itself is not enough for achieving a full understanding of CSCL. The complexity of the interaction processes and the myriad sources of data make it difficult for SNA to provide an in-depth analysis of CSCL.[85] Researchers indicate that SNA needs to be complemented with other methods of analysis to form a more accurate picture of collaborative learning experiences.[86]
A number of research studies have combined other types of analysis with SNA in the study of CSCL. This can be referred to as a multi-method approach or data triangulation, which will lead to an increase of evaluation reliability in CSCL studies.
Qualitative method – The principles of qualitative case study research constitute a solid framework for the integration of SNA methods in the study of CSCL experiences.[87]
Ethnographic data such as student questionnaires and interviews and classroom non-participant observations[86]
Case studies: comprehensively study particular CSCL situations and relate findings to general schemes[86]
Content analysis: offers information about the content of the communication among members[86]
Quantitative method – This includes simple descriptive statistical analyses on occurrences to identify particular attitudes of group members who have not been able to be tracked via SNA in order to detect general tendencies.
Computer log files: provide automatic data on how collaborative tools are used by learners[86]
^Otte, Evelien; Rousseau, Ronald (December 2002). "Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences". Journal of Information Science. 28 (6): 441–453. doi:10.1177/016555150202800601. S2CID17454166.
^ abHagen, Loni; Keller, Thomas; Neely, Stephen; DePaula, Nic; Robert-Cooperman, Claudia (October 2018). "Crisis Communications in the Age of Social Media: A Network Analysis of Zika-Related Tweets". Social Science Computer Review. 36 (5): 523–541. doi:10.1177/0894439317721985. OCLC7323548177. S2CID67362137.
^Nasrinpour, Hamid Reza; Friesen, Marcia R.; McLeod, Robert D. (November 22, 2016). "An Agent-Based Model of Message Propagation in the Facebook Electronic Social Network". arXiv:1611.07454 [cs.SI].
^ abBrennecke, Julia; Rank, Olaf (May 2017). "The firm's knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study". Research Policy. 46 (4): 768–783. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.002.
^ abHarris, Jenine K.; Luke, Douglas A.; Zuckerman, Rachael B.; Shelton, Sarah C. (June 2009). "Forty Years of Secondhand Smoke Research". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 36 (6): 538–548. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.039. OCLC6980180781. PMID19372026.
^ abcBrennecke, Julia (June 2020). "Dissonant Ties in Intraorganizational Networks: Why Individuals Seek Problem-Solving Assistance from Difficult Colleagues". Academy of Management Journal. 63 (3): 743–778. doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0399. OCLC8163488129. S2CID164852065.
^Ivaldi M.; Ferreri L.; Daolio F.; Giacobini M.; Tomassini M.; Rainoldi A. "We-Sport: from academy spin-off to data-base for complex network analysis; an innovative approach to a new technology". J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 51 (suppl. 1 to issue 3). hdl:2318/90491. The social network analysis was used to analyze properties of the network We-Sport.com allowing a deep interpretation and analysis of the level of aggregation phenomena in the specific context of sport and physical exercise.
^Yao, Qi; Li, Rita Yi Man; Song, Lingxi; Crabbe, M. James C. (November 1, 2021). "Construction safety knowledge sharing on Twitter: A social network analysis". Safety Science. 143: 105411. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105411. hdl:10547/625062.
^ abFreeman, Linton C (2004). The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press; BookSurge. ISBN978-1-59457-714-7. OCLC429594334.[page needed]
^Linton Freeman (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
^Anheier, Helmut K.; Gerhards, Jurgen; Romo, Frank P. (January 1995). "Forms of Capital and Social Structure in Cultural Fields: Examining Bourdieu's Social Topography". American Journal of Sociology. 100 (4): 859–903. doi:10.1086/230603. S2CID143587142.
^de Nooy, Wouter (October 2003). "Fields and networks: correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory". Poetics. 31 (5–6): 305–327. doi:10.1016/s0304-422x(03)00035-4.
^Senekal, Burgert (December 1, 2012). "Die Afrikaanse literêre sisteem : 'n eksperimentele benadering met behulp van Sosiale-netwerk-analise (SNA) : geesteswetenskappe" [The Afrikaans literary system: an experimental approach using Social Network Analysis (SNA): humanities]. Litnet Akademies (in Afrikaans). 9 (3): 614–638. hdl:10520/EJC129817.
^McPherson, Miller; Smith-Lovin, Lynn; Cook, James M (August 2001). "Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks". Annual Review of Sociology. 27 (1): 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415. S2CID2341021.
^Podolny, Joel M.; Baron, James N. (October 1997). "Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace". American Sociological Review. 62 (5): 673. CiteSeerX10.1.1.114.6822. doi:10.2307/2657354. JSTOR2657354.
^Kilduff, M.; Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organisations. Sage Publications.
^Flynn, Francis J.; Reagans, Ray E.; Guillory, Lucia (2010). "Do you two know each other? Transitivity, homophily, and the need for (network) closure". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99 (5): 855–869. doi:10.1037/a0020961. PMID20954787. S2CID6335920.
^ abGranovetter, Mark S. (May 1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties". American Journal of Sociology. 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469. S2CID59578641.
^The most comprehensive reference is: Wasserman, Stanley & Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Networks Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. A short, clear basic summary is in Krebs, Valdis (2000). "The Social Life of Routers". Internet Protocol Journal. 3 (December): 14–25.
^Opsahl, Tore; Agneessens, Filip; Skvoretz, John (July 2010). "Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths". Social Networks. 32 (3): 245–251. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.
^Cohesive.blocking is the R program for computing structural cohesion according to the Moody-White (2003) algorithm. This wiki site provides numerous examples and a tutorial for use with R.
^Bacher, R. (1995). "Graphical interaction and visualization for the analysis and interpretation of contingency analysis results". Graphical Interaction and Visualization for the Analysis and Interpretation of Contingency Analysis Result. Proceedings of the 1995 Power Industry Computer Applications. Salt Lake City, USA: IEEE Power Engineering Society. pp. 128–134. doi:10.1109/PICA.1995.515175. ISBN0-7803-2663-6.
^Caschera, M. C.; Ferri, F.; Grifoni, P. (2008). "SIM: A dynamic multidimensional visualization method for social networks". PsychNology Journal. 6 (3): 291–320.
^McGrath, Cathleen; Blythe, Jim; Krackhardt, David (August 1997). "The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs". Social Networks. 19 (3): 223–242. CiteSeerX10.1.1.121.5856. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00299-7.
^Cartwright, Dorwin; Harary, Frank (1956). "Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory". Psychological Review. 63 (5): 277–293. doi:10.1037/h0046049. PMID13359597. S2CID14779113.
^Hogan, Bernie; Carrasco, Juan Antonio; Wellman, Barry (May 2007). "Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms". Field Methods. 19 (2): 116–144. doi:10.1177/1525822X06298589. S2CID61291563.
^Anger, Isabel; Kittl, Christian (2011). "Measuring influence on Twitter". Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies - i-KNOW '11. p. 1. doi:10.1145/2024288.2024326. ISBN9781450307321. S2CID30427.
^Riquelme, Fabián; González-Cantergiani, Pablo (September 2016). "Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey". Information Processing & Management. 52 (5): 949–975. arXiv:1508.07951. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.003. S2CID16343144.
^Osterbur, Megan; Kiel, Christina (April 2017). "A hegemon fighting for equal rights: the dominant role of COC Nederland in the LGBT transnational advocacy network". Global Networks. 17 (2): 234–254. doi:10.1111/glob.12126.
^ abcdefghijLaat, Maarten de; Lally, Vic; Lipponen, Lasse; Simons, Robert-Jan (March 8, 2007). "Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis". International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2 (1): 87–103. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9006-4. S2CID3238474.
^"Patterns of Interaction in Computer-supported Learning: A Social Network Analysis". International Conference of the Learning Sciences. 2013. pp. 346–351. doi:10.4324/9780203763865-71. ISBN9780203763865.
^Martı́nez, A.; Dimitriadis, Y.; Rubia, B.; Gómez, E.; de la Fuente, P. (December 2003). "Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions". Computers & Education. 41 (4): 353–368. CiteSeerX10.1.1.114.7474. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001. S2CID10636524.
^Cho, H.; Stefanone, M. & Gay, G (2002). Social information sharing in a CSCL community. Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 43–50. CiteSeerX10.1.1.225.5273.
^Aviv, R.; Erlich, Z.; Ravid, G. & Geva, A. (2003). "Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks". Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 7 (3): 1–23. CiteSeerX10.1.1.2.9044.
^Construction safety knowledge sharing on Twitter: A social network analysis, Safety Science, Volume 143, November 2021, 105411
^ abcdefgMartínez, A.; Dimitriadis, Y.; Rubia, B.; Gómez, E.; de la Fuente, P. (December 1, 2003). "Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions". Computers & Education. Documenting Collaborative Interactions: Issues and Approaches. 41 (4): 353–368. CiteSeerX10.1.1.114.7474. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001. S2CID10636524.
^Johnson, Karen E. (January 1, 1996). "Review of The Art of Case Study Research". The Modern Language Journal. 80 (4): 556–557. doi:10.2307/329758. JSTOR329758.
.svg)
