Johnson Tang (존슨탕), Lyndon B. Johnson soup.

[edit]

Lyndon B. Johnson soup. what mean? Lyndon B. Johnson is very famous in korea?Firefox001 04:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson was the U.S. president responsible for escalating the Vietnam war into an international "Police Action". U.S. military bases in Korea were heavily utilized for the staging of U.S. troops, and Korean military were mobilized to fight in Vietnam. The Korean economy was still in a very bad state at the time, and the veritable flood of food that arrived with the influx of American troops was a much appreciated boost to the Korean diet. Korean history in the 20th century is a fascinating and complex subject that requires good understanding of Pan-Asian political history and the impact of U.S. involvement in the region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recipe belongs in Wikibooks

[edit]

What the etiquette about moving it? Boy in the bands (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with ((WikiProject Food and drink)) banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a tour guide

[edit]

I swear part of this article reads like it was directly copied from someone's travel blog or something. It is not academic in style and needs a rework.

--Heero Kirashami (talk) 06:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Budae jjigae. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Budae-jjigae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not a 5x expansion and also not eligible due to a high copyvio score.

(
)

5x expanded by Toobigtokale (talk). Self-nominated at 20:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Budae-jjigae; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

ALT1 ... that the Korean stew budae-jjigae commonly includes baked beans, Spam, corn, and American cheese? Source: It features Neoguri instant ramen noodles, pork stock, kimchi, rice cakes, Spam, and Kirkland Signature-brand hot dogs, mozzarella, and American cheese. [2] and 부대찌개 만드는 법은 여러 종류의 햄과 소시지를 큼직하고 썰고 통조림 콩, 잘 익은 김치, 양념 돼지고기, 고추, 애호박, 팽이버섯, 파 등을 썰어 준비한 후 냄비에 참기름을 두르고 돼지고기를 달달 볶는다. 사골육수나 닭육수를 부어 끓이다가 돼지고기가 익으면 다진 김치, 콘, 소시지, 스팸, 프랑크소시지, 애호박, 두부 등을 넣어 끓인다. translating to To make budae-jjigae, cut a variety of ham and sausages into large pieces, then add canned beans, sour kimchi, marinated pork, red pepper, zucchini, enoki mushroom, and green onion, then stir-fry the pork in a pan with sesame oil. Add beef bone broth or chicken broth and boil, and when the pork is cooked, add minced kimchi, corn, sausage, spam, frankfurters, zucchini, and tofu. [3]
:3 F4U (they/it) 02:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More info

[edit]

Hi, I expanded the article a good chunk, but I think there's potential for more work. I'm currently in the US but I suspect there's Korean language books that have more info on the dish. I think I've exhausted most of what Google had to offer in English and Korean. I've also gone through lots of academic articles in both English and Korean and lots of books in English. Books in Korean are the only thing that I didn't have access to. toobigtokale (talk) 09:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Budae-jjigae/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 19:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

[edit]

I'll have a go at this one, an interesting article and a curious dish. Oddly reminiscent of the hybrid character of England's unofficial national dish, Chicken tikka masala ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will get on the comments :) toobigtokale (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor issues:

  • Hmm.. I pruned a bunch of the "also"s but the ones I've left I've hesitated on. I imply "in addition to" in these uses, which is needed for the ideas I'm expressing. E.g. The Busan variant of the dish also led to the development of dwaeji-gukbap, a pork-based rice dish. The Busan variant led to both budae-jjigae and dwaeji-gukbap in parallel, if I deleted "also" I read that as possibly implying it only led to dwaeji-gukbap, likely as a stepping stone to budae jjigae (as earlier in the para i imply dwaeji is a predecessor to budae). "Also" concisely eliminates that possibility toobigtokale (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name:

  • Hmmm it'd become Jjigae (찌개) has a thicker consistency than guk (soup). Bit hesitant on this one; I'd rather the reader is told upfront what it generally is and then adjust the idea, rather than have them derive it relative to something else. I want to hear your thoughts though toobigtokale (talk) 02:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A soup thicker than soup makes no sense. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
done toobigtokale (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Description:

No, there are any number of readers who've never geard if the stuff, that's what Wikipedia is for. If you think everyone knows, why are you writing? Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
?? I'm writing on a more developed niche topic using concepts that are more familiar to a lot of people. If anything I should explain what baked beans are too; I'm very confident more people in the world have had instant ramen than baked beans.
I'll explain it anyway though toobigtokale (talk) 09:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Some opt to exclude ... also exist." --- Should this not be moved to "Variants"?

Preparation:

  • It's rare to not add things I think; how's this: In restaurants, the dish comes with a set of base ingredients and more ingredients can be added for additional charge toobigtokale (talk) 02:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest: ... base ingredients; more can be ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
done toobigtokale (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Variants:

  • I'd argue no need to gloss; instant ramen is eaten or known of very widely (especially by people who have access to the internet and wikipedia). I think cultures that are unfamiliar with instant ramen would need many western food names glossed too toobigtokale (talk) 02:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Minimum is wikilink. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done toobigtokale (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there aren't reliable sources then remove it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... I mean we know it exists, there just isn't a detailed description of it. It's mentioned in virtually every article about Budae-jjigae, along with Johnson-tang. I'll remove it anyway, but people who are familiar with budae-jjigae in Korea will notice it's missing. toobigtokale (talk) 10:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kkulkkuri-juk:

Should be Jeong only then. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
? There's only "Jeon"; there's a "Jeong" in the cultural legacy section but with a different given name, is this who you're referring to? toobigtokale (talk) 10:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I assume you have this correct now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Development of budae-jjigae:

Do say so, and wikilink. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
done toobigtokale (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent history:

  • It's a bit rare in Korea too 😅 I'm a bit on the fence on this one; it's the official name of the street and I don't have any quick ideas on how to explain it to the reader concisely otherwise. toobigtokale (talk) 02:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural legacy:

  • "researcher of Korean cinema" (initially did korean cinema researcher, but realized it could imply her nationality was korean) toobigtokale (talk) 02:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also:

  • Pruned; Han I think is somewhat relevant because the emotions described in the article are all a part of Han. The after effects of the events of the 20th century. toobigtokale (talk) 02:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

References:

Categories:

Nothing should exist only in the lead, as it's only a summary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
done toobigtokale (talk) 09:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

Well, this is an interesting and well-cited article, and there's really very little wrong with it. I hope to see it at GA very soon. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories