This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I'm not sure it could be correct that her mother died when she was 10, as the passenger list of the Alleghany arriving in New York from Kingston 30 Oct 1895 lists Miss Pamela Smith, age 17, with Mrs. Charles Smith, age 38. Tarchon05:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also note the arrival of the Alene in New York from Kingston on 4 Oct 1893 with Corinne Smith (45) and Pamela Smith (15). In March 1897 she made the same voyage on the Alleghany again with her father Charles E. Smith (age 50), which could bracket the date of Corinne Smith's death. There's also a London-NY voyage on the Mesaba dated 22 Sept. 1906 under the full name "Pamela Colman Smith" (noted as "American Citizen" here as in previous cases) Tarchon05:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other sources list her mother has having died in 1896. Perhaps this should be provisionally included in the article, in lieu of the clearly incorrect date of 1888?Valli Nagy 20:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValliNagy (talk • contribs)
I'm being very restrained by not just deleting the last paragraph. It consists almost entirely of speculation about what is "likely", "unlikely", "doubtful", and so on, written in a smug and informal tone (I note the comment about whether Wait would "hang out" in Smith's studio), none of which are sourced, and which add up to a systematic and inappropriate campaign to maximise the importance of Smith's contribution to the the tarot deck and minimise Waite's. It's arguing a point of view, not presenting facts.
Now, it happens that the "Smith was the author and Waite wasn't" point of view is a popular one, and the fact that lots of people do think that is something we should report. But it remains a point of view, not the only one and not a well-supported one. We shouldn't present an original argument for it as objective fact. 216.75.188.95 (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It's disturbing to see that sort of unsupported speculation in a Wiki entry: "it is likely" "it appears" "it is not unlikely" and meaningless praise: "the talented and intuitive Smith" "This is a short period of time for an artist to complete some 80 pictures" and so forth. 76.10.135.246 (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
sources seem to indicate that the original plates of her tarot deck images were destroyed in ww2. the commemorative set seems to say they are reproduced from the originals. anyone who has seen the various editions of this deck over the years knows that the line reproduction is second rate, a copy of a copy. if the new set is somehow better, that would be really big news for art lovers and historians. no one has commented yet on this, but most tarot fans arent serious art critics. if anyone can get sourcing on this, that would be great.(Mercurywoodrose)76.232.11.11 (talk) 03:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No mention is made anywhere of her Personal Life. Didn't she have one? Female middle class members of the Art world in the 1900s were quite well-placed to have them. Nuttyskin (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Pamela Colman Smith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.