Hello, BrickMaster02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:American Idol Live 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>))
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm AldezD. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced information or change content based upon your own WP:OR as you did in this edit. AldezD (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TheSubstituteLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
What makes you say the number I gave for the 6th episode isn't the actual rating? Wubzy (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
The ratings you provided were for the Nick Jr. airing at 8 PM, while I provided the ratings for the original 9 AM airing on Nickelodeon. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 in American television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 13:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NickUnfilteredLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TheAstronautsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Why did you get rid of the source of the American Idol Season 19 Finale date? Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I removed it because who knows if it could get moved back. Personally, I'd rather wait until the finale actually airs instead of jumping ahead. BrickMaster02 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Since the series has aired on Disney XD USA, I was wondering if you could add the data of the ratings for each when they first premiered in the US. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
I want you to insert the ratings dats for the Amphibia episode "True Colors", the 101 Dalmatian Street episode "Fetch"/"Don't Push Your Luck", the The Chicken Squad episodes that have aired so far and the HouseBroken episode "Who Did This?".
That is absolutely impossible. The only site to cover those ratings, Showbuzz Daily, shut down and no one knows what they were. Sorry, but you're gonna have to deal with that. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Bcschneider53. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Common Knowledge (game show) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from edit summaries such as this one and settle disagreements with civility on the talk page. No need for public personal attacks on anonymous IPs (or anyone else) like that. Thank you. Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Please clean-up the episode list to the series, as it tends to go by production order rather than US broadcast order. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Why do you revert my edits on List of programs broadcast by TeenNick?, I only removed some fake and unsourced information, and updated according to the current status, and I think is very irrelevant to list every movie that has aired on every network, we don't wanna list every film that has aired on TeenNick, that list is unverificable, and olny list the movies thas have aired on the NickRewind block, please, do not undo my edits again!!!--SCD0392 (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
I currently have a sandbox for the show. It doesn't have an actual article yet and there is currently only two episodes on the episode list. Can you please help me construct it? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Find any viewership data on ShowBuzz Daily? If so, I'm happy. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FamJamLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Severestorm28 04:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Adventures of Paddington (2019 TV series) into Draft:List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 23:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)BrickMaster02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel really bad about what I did, and I have learned my lesson. Even though I "tried" to clean up, it didn't work and I don't care anymore. I really want to make a change and not argue with people on this site, and I can't do that if I'm blocked. Please unblock me, and I swear I will never do anything like this ever again. And if I do, you have the right to permanently ban me from this site.
Decline reason:
This does not address your edit warring and your refusal to collaborate. What would you do differently if unblocked? How would you resolve this problem, if it happens again? Yamla (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|reason=On Promised Land (2022 TV series), I was trying to clean up the episode table, have each label (Director, Writer, Original air date) layered. I just thought YoungForever was undoing my changes out of spite. Turns out I was the one who undid her changes out of spite. If I was unblocked and resolved this problem, I would actually give an explanation in the edit summary or go on the talk page in advance and discuss more in-depth. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)}
is closed. Thanks @Blaze Wolf: for trying to help. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block. PLEASE see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Points to PONDER: EDIT WARRING is wrong even if one is right. ANY ARGUMENTS in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal. CALLING ATTENTION to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior. To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what this all means.
It has been detected that you or someone else is trying to spam our system with appeals. Please wait until your previous appeal is closed, or if it's already closed, please try again later.
BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BrickMaster02". The reason given for BrickMaster02's block is: "Edit warring; personal attacks (filed a report against the other editor at WP:AIV; refusal to collaborate (reverted the other editor's attempt to discuss the dispute on the article Talk page)".
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Paramount+. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:YoungForever. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 21:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Only one other Disney XD list-of article for the United Kingdom exists among all the DXD networks, many of which are now defunct or about to be; I just removed the Latin American version which had ONE source and was duplicative of this list, along with Jetix and Fox Kids, and every other list among these defunct networks has a blazing 'unsourced' tag on the top. There's no point to maintain these lists when one united list-of article can cover it all, thus my reason for reverting the 'U.S.' part (and it doesn't have anything saying 'just American' in the title). Nate • (chatter) 01:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
This personal attack is uncalled for. Please be kind to other editors, even if you disagree with them or they're vandalizing. Nate • (chatter) 03:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
No clue if I did this right... How did you get this image to be a fully transparent background? (for reference, the logo is available on the Nickelodeon website.) Magitroopa (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
If the editor most recently on Special:Contributions/2603:300A:F00:3000:0:0:0:0/64 reappears with Steve Burns vandalism, let me know. We might need to get an edit filter created to stop this user. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Sunmist (talk) 03:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Please just cut out all of the profanities and telling people to "go away" in edit summaries. In fact, do not attempt to talk to people in edit summaries at all. Use them for the purpose that's there in their very name: to summarize an edit. They're there for the benefits of other people to scan through an edit history to locate who did what and when, not to be used as a chat tool. "go away" doesn't tell us what happened to the article or why.
Look at my edit summary of Special:Diff/1081883901, for example. I said why I did what I did in the edit, and that is it. Special:Diff/1081941063 is an edit summary from someone else, likewise just summarizing the edit. I'm also talking with the writer of the article, but using a talk page for that, not edit summaries. And we're getting along well.
You're clearly finding it difficult to control your feelings in edit summaries, so the best thing to do is just impose a blanket rule on yourself never to use edit summaries to do anything other than summarize an edit. When you find yourself tempted to do so, pause. Try to aim for the plain unadorned descriptivity of Special:Diff/1081682285, everywhere.
Uncle G (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Came upon this IP range (that is now blocked) earlier tonight with the same Steve Burns/Donovan Patton vandalism I'd previously seen on other articles (ex: [1] [2] [3] [4]). I definitely remember seeing this same sort of vandalism on a previous article(s?), but can't remember when/where at all. Would you possibly have any clue?... Magitroopa (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Is it in the same range as the informal TUFF Puppy reunion adder on pages like the Mario movie? Kinda curious--CreecregofLife (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey BrickMaster02, I thought you were gonna add the progress table for the Season 4 premiere episode. But I don't see it. Do you think you can add it soon?74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Amphibia episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Again, the press site is broken with the 307 code being repeated. Haven't you checked? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Why are you ignoring the note?--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit without reasons ? Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
They revealed Chapa's last name in Unmasked earlier tonight. Did I spell it wrong? Connor Marini (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you have sent a warning to user True to the Music. I have started many SPIs on this user but I can't be bothered to do so again. It's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fourlaxers/Archive NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Children's TV, especially Thomas & Friends and Power Rangers, are their area. Enjoy and sorry.NEDOCHAN (talk) 20:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Transformers: Earthspark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Can you please stop undoing everything on List of Paramount Global television programs please? If you do so you won't do that again. 82.37.139.114 (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Please include the Disney+ originals show within Disney Channel programming. Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon have included shows from HBO Max & Paramount+, respectively. It's usually the shows produced by their studios (eg. Nick Animation Studio, CN Studios, WB Animation). MegaSmike46 (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi BrickMaster02, you seen to be well-versed in America Says, adding the new episodes to Wikipedia as they air. Do you happen to know the win rate across all the games or know where i might be able to find that info? I can't find it anywhere after some extensive googling! Thanks 2600:1007:B11E:884C:5889:186B:6C9:DD8C (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the information and thanks for keeping us up to date on the America Says game facts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1007:B11E:884C:5889:186B:6C9:DD8C (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Why did you undo my edits on Are You Afraid of the Dark? page then re add it make it look like it was your idea to add the producers? All you had to do was add what you added without UNDOING my edits first. It makes what I did look like I did something wrong!! ACase0000 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit of "Chibiverse", as well?Inkan1969 (talk) 02:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
I was not done yet, and "Was just a single edit, jeez..." is clearly incorrect. Almost all your edits, and as far as I can tell all your reverts, lack a proper edit summary. In the DramaRama article you should have seen that there was discussion--there was a link to a WikiProject page too. In general, you seem to suffer from a fairly uncollegial attitude, and not explaining what you are doing only makes that more evident. And then, of course, you revert me, instead of addressing my point, before I could finish it. This, all this, needs to stop. It's a collaborative project, and you simply have to work with other editors. That means explaining what you are doing, and being much more careful when you hit revert. And you should probably read WP:TWINKLEABUSE. Drmies (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Okay, so you did revert my edit on Amphibia episode list, but on the summary, you just violated WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS with the use of The Owl House article. But, I will tell you why I did that edit.
One day, I was checking on the article List of The Simpsons episodes, and I was checking on the first season, and discovered storyboard credits. Thought of reverting at first, but the IP that is making the edits is doing the same to all of the seasons, and since end credits apply to WP:PRIMARY, I joined in not minding it since the IP is not gonna care at all, and added storyboard credits for season 21. The IP did the rest of the seasons though.
I then thought of adding some end credits to some shows, but with animation directors this time. I readded the animation director credits for 101 Dalmatian Street. For Amphibia, that show credits the studios instead of the animators, and was going to add more credits with seasons 2 and 3, until you came in.
Not into any edit wars because I wanted to be in peace, in fact you do have a big history of edit wars but even I get worried of getting block sometimes, and not just you. The internet is crap sometimes, you know… BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Please do not interact with this user if at all possible. I have warned them to stay off your page. Let's try and lower the temperature here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samantha Harris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GSN.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't know what is going on with you and me on the List of Paramount Global television programs, you're causing an edit war with me and there was something wrong you revered my edits. Please don't block that article forever. I am not attacking you im actually asking you to stop reverting it. 82.37.139.114 (talk) 82.37.139.114 (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
What was wrong with the episode status section? I included citations, are Buzzr's website and The Roku Channel's website not reliable sources? I want to add information about where the show can be watched currently. MightyArms (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Vidpro23 has removed content once again and I reverted his edits on my own so could you block that user? 213.107.50.76 (talk) 10:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some notes on template formatting on Firebuds - Putting an efn into an empty OriginalAirDate field causes the article to appear in Category:Episode lists with unformatted air dates for maintenance because this is not supported. Can you either (a) add the date it was released on d+ and include the efn, (b) remove the efn for those TBAs, or (c) figure out some other supported way to show the data you're trying to show? I understand the reason for the note (and the data), but as-is, it's not technically supported. (I would ordinarily put this as a content discussion on the article talk, but felt it wasn't warranted - if you do, feel free to move this there - either is fine by me). ButlerBlog (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
On September 17, 2021 Vidpro23 has removed most content on the List of Universal Television programs article so could you revert his edit and also could you add Loot (TV series), Killing It and Bust Down please? 82.37.139.114 (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi, BrickMaster02, could you please reply to me your reason for reverting my edit? I hope you reverted it/them for a reason. Instructions are clear per ((infobox television)), but sometimes entertainment articles, sources and claims don't go the usual mainstreamers until they get bundled with outlets considered here on Wikipedia as WP:SPS. As I've mentioned on my edit summary, I followed to the detail what is meant for the updates so you would understand. Any doubts?! Check the "Showbuzz Daily" ref and scroll to no. 56 of the top 150 list for the reason for my updates. Please, don't follow on bare sight and revert without proof, be it for better wording as Lockejava would claim or maybe you for better text sight pleasure, as this infuriates editors and readers alike. Wikipedia strives for accuracy and updates, which is why I'm here. So, unless you want to be blocked for any reason for/of which I'll be uninvolved, please don't revert without edit summary reason. Thanks!! Intrisit (talk) 16:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Can you explain why my edits were reverted on pages such as Template:Curious George, Template:Former Nickelodeon original series, Count Duckula, and List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon? I am especially concerned about Template:Curious George, which I was simply adding another clearly related television series, and Count Duckula, which I provided a source for. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Am I supposed to wait until it is on schedule before making the edit?Cwater1 (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits. All I am doing is improving the page. They are constructive and useful. I would like to revert my edits peacefully. If you disagree, I'll leave it be. Helloiamauser (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
I mean, I see nothing wrong with full years and present. What's so bad about it? Helloiamauser (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
How was it that what I wrote in the article was "Not really pertaining to the actual plot..."? Isn't writing the plot for a series about the aspects of the series? 104.172.112.209 (talk) 15:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
I replaced the plot with a premise but you still revert. What's wrong with it? 104.172.112.209 (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for fixing all the Nicktoons (American TV channel) Wikilinks. From a fellow animation fan, good work! –DMartin 04:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC) |
Why did you revert my Batwheels edits? I added the directors of all the episodes that have been released, and fixed the episode numbers. TheThomasEnthusiast (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
You applied a bunch of G14 tags like this. G14 is for specific disambiguation pages. Not a single one of these pages were disambiguation pages. Please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and ensure you understand the specific criteria before you nominate something for speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Are you doing okay? In response to the comment implying dark thoughts of a personal nature? / Do you need someone to talk to? Coimenda (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Why was it deleted? It was well-soruced. 2600:6C50:23F:406E:9A87:8F47:144A:9359 (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for actually giving me a valid reliable source to review with your air date additions unlike the 20 previous others who just assumed the schedule just because its weekly! I applaud you! GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OK--now I understand why you are yelling: because I warned you a few days ago about this unwise and unexplained edit. You don't seem to realize that unexplained edits are disruptive. I had forgotten about that, no big deal, but you hadn't--unless you go "what the fuck" to everyone. But a look through your talk page's edit history shows that your typical response to any comment here is to simply revert and to start cussing. I'm not sure you understand what Wikipedia is: it is a collaborative project, and you are going to have to get used to that. That means that you'll have to actually respond to editors' concerns--and if you don't, and if you continue to insult them, you might well end up blocked. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Originally I was gonna write the message to you but due to drama on that Drmies made, I had to postponed it a bit. Anyways, I request you to update this list and make it similar to other episodes lists in the guidelines, especially List of The Loud House episodes, due to the renewal that had happened. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Can you explain why you made these two page moves? It's not the standard Wikipedia naming convention. Korny O'Near (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
I added archived pages on the Moon Girl page because Twitter is in a weird place right now and it makes sense to add archived links. As for the mentions of they/them as pronouns of a few characters, I only mentioned it because it was part of the dialogue in that episode. Historyday01 (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The link you posted is for one about James Corden and is from last year. I've reverted the affected articles (including 2023 in American television). Do not revert it again. TheCatLife (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Could you please stop reverting my edits to Alan Carr's Epic Gameshow. Please see ITV (TV network), ITV1 and STV (TV channel) articles for the relevant details as to why I have changed the network back to ITV (TV network), and not just ITV1. GMc (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
You should know what WP:AIV is for by now. It's clearly not for content disputes. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Why did you undo statistics, it seems on your page people asked you for the win rate, yet you couldn't provide it... I provided it and you removed it. America says data (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Why did you delete my updates on streaming service owners? 45.42.111.74 (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
That one episode was in the Futon Critic listing but was removed. Airdate was April 20th, but it must have been postponed. It will likely be posted again when an airdate is selected. Cwater1 (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Can you please make an Elimination Chart for the page? All other season pages feature an elimination chart, but not this one yet. Can you please make an Elimination Chart for American Idol (season 21)? Please. 2600:6C48:427F:9122:4CE6:7C7B:4C7E:1CFF (talk) 02:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
I have declined your speedy deletion request for Supermarket Sweep (franchise) because the reason you provided is not a valid CSD. If you believe the article needs to be deleted, you should nominate it through articles for deletion. Whpq (talk) 22:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, your dispute with another user on Supermarket Sweep appears to be devolved into an edit war. Please try to reach consensus on the article's talk page. Merko (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure what's going on between you and BrickMaster02, but I don't think your reporting them at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism was a proper use of this channel. I don't have time to look into this further, but this looks more like a content dispute. In future, please don't use the AIAV page unless you have a clearly defined, enforceable reason. --Hadal (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
In the Judges and Hosts section of the American Idol page, can you please add Alanis Morissette and Ed Sheeran to the paragraph about Guest Judges? Please. 2601:40A:8400:5A40:DDC5:34CF:6C96:F91C (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I think you have a habit of making unexplained reverts, and of edit warring. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
You said: You're the one that's doing disruptive editing. You didn't discuss this with anyone. Way to jump to conclusions.... That's not to the point. I explained my edits, twice; you did not do so a single time. You have a choice: if you continue edit warring, I will take this to ANI, where editors and administrators can have a good look at your long history of unexplained edits, edit warring, and rudeness. Drmies (talk) 01:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Can you please go to the "American Idol (season 21)" page and fix the finale chart? Too many edits. I would like you to fix this, pronto! 2601:40A:8400:5A40:5C21:5396:7BE9:9C30 (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
The parts of "Bernard of the Creek" are billed as separate episodes, like "Capture the Flag War". The entry for the latter lists the titles of the parts individually. I realize that the parts of "Bernard of the Creek" don't have subtitles, but does it make sense to have them listed differently? Zombiewizard45 (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Can you please improve this article? I did try my best at improving it but something just seems off since even if the show already premiered, the article may not follow notability. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit here? Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Why revert my latest edit? The article for Tooned Out is still available on the Warner Bros. wiki. 🤷🏻♂️ DecaTilde 23:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Do not add additional comments to the end of them, and no telling others to go away. Thank you. TheCatLife (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
would you consider ustvdb a reliable source for ratings? It's got quite a few numbers for some recent premieres Xery1234 (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Looney Tunes Cartoons episodes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Looney Tunes Cartoons episodes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I've declined your report of The Grand Delusion to AIV. AIV is for vandalism and overt promotional spam only; it is not a board to take anyone you have a disagreement with, nor anyone you feel is editing disruptively. If you have a disagreement with another editor, you should first try to engage with them on the article's talk page, and if that doesn't work, then you can consider taking them to another board (not AIV) for other opinions. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Aoidh (talk) 22:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Please note that applying the MOS such as MOS:COMMA is not an exemption to WP:3RR, and you have made 4 reverts at Chain Reaction (game show) with no attempt at discussion or explanation of any kind other than this single edit summary that simply says Knock it off. The formatting was right.
That you declared at WP:AIV that you will never stop undoing contributed to this block, as that is not how disputes should be resolved. - Aoidh (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
BrickMaster02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, looking back, I shouldn't have said nor done what I did. I want to admit my wrongdoing and earnestly apologize for my behavior. It was unacceptable and not in line with Wikipedia's collaborative nature. I deeply regret the confusion and frustration I caused. With that said, I am committed to learning from this experience and changing my demeanor. While I can't guarantee I won't slip up again, I'm dedicated to communicating better, being patient, and treating all contributors with respect. I wholly understand that trust needs to be earned, and I hope you can see my sincerity in seeking a fresh start. Thank you. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:47, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Do you retract the statement that you "will never stop undoing"? 331dot (talk) 08:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. https://showbuzzdaily.com/ is still operating. Why remove the viewer table because of you think it’s unnecessary? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Your explanation for removing the years of the specials from the table makes no sense. There are cited sources that confirm when the 2023 specials are going to air. Also, every other section of episodes has had a year added to it for clarification, and that year has been added to the table when the season is added. There are now two years that have had the Halloween episodes, so having the year included in the table adds clarification to the reader, and again every special has a cited source to back it up with. Please stop removing the years from the specials, the years add clarficiation and synchronicity to the table. - 17:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC) SanAnMan (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at The Great Christmas Light Fight shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SanAnMan (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you revert me (without any reason)? Yann (talk) 18:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry to interrupt what you are doing, but I just got started on making the Dora CGI 2024 series via draft. I'm not so sure if you are aware of this, but I saw some sneak peeks of the series on the official Dora & Friends YouTube Channel.
Second, the sources. Overall, I've found 4 so far (including a YouTube source). The only thing I had a hard time with is the studios. I just heard that Pipeline Studios (based in Ottawa) are going to produce the series with Nickelodeon Animation Studio for Paramount+, according to some unreliable sources. The only footage I found was this at the end credits of the sneak peeks. VictorRocks (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi BrickMaster02! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of Paramount+ original programming that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 22:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Paramount+ original programming shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Happily888 (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:BrickMaster02 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: ). Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
My mistake on that tagging. I totally thought TBD meant "To be determined". My bad! Thanks for reverting conman33 (. . .talk) 03:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
An IP user as been pasting very short episode summaries from other websites. Can you please check on this draft for me? It has been getting lots of trouble though IP users. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I moved some sections of that page, because these programs were all released as proven by the references. What was the matter? Why did you reverted my edits? 82.50.167.55 (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)BrickMaster02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the issues raised against me, particularly with my lack of edit summaries and the excessive use of warnings, resulting in another block. I genuinely apologize for any disruption my actions have caused and I am dedicated to improving my contributions on this site. From now on, I plan to grow from this and add transparent edit summaries, while also being cautious when warning other users. I deeply appreciate the collaborative nature of Wikipedia and kindly request a reconsideration of the block, assuring you of my sincere commitment to change for the better. Thank you. BrickMaster02 (talk) 9:50 pm, Yesterday (UTC−5)
Decline reason:
duplicated below -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.
Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.
Points to ponder:
To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks,-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
BrickMaster02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Looking back, I should not have done what I did. I fully acknowledge the causes behind my block, those being edit disputes, ill advised and lack of editing summaries and excessive use of warnings toward newcomers, and I want you to understand that I sincerely regret performing all of them. My commitment is by any means to avoid such behavior in the future and engage myself in a productive collaboration on Wikipedia. Deepfriedokra and other editors have given their opinions on discussions and consensus-building particularly. I am dedicated to taking a step back and discussing any disputes on relevant talk pages in the future, so I can prevent this from happening again. Some concerns raised about civility and collaboration are justifiable, and I am going to sort these problems out moving forward. I cannot promise that this won't happen again, but I am devoted to being cooperative and treating others with dignity. I guarantee you that this request is a vast development from the last two appeals, and I am ready to settle this issue affirmatively. [[User:BrickMaster02|BrickMaster02]] ([[User talk:BrickMaster02#top|talk]]) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~))
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here))
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
((unblock reviewed |1=Looking back, I should not have done what I did. I fully acknowledge the causes behind my block, those being edit disputes, ill advised and lack of editing summaries and excessive use of warnings toward newcomers, and I want you to understand that I sincerely regret performing all of them. My commitment is by any means to avoid such behavior in the future and engage myself in a productive collaboration on Wikipedia. Deepfriedokra and other editors have given their opinions on discussions and consensus-building particularly. I am dedicated to taking a step back and discussing any disputes on relevant talk pages in the future, so I can prevent this from happening again. Some concerns raised about civility and collaboration are justifiable, and I am going to sort these problems out moving forward. I cannot promise that this won't happen again, but I am devoted to being cooperative and treating others with dignity. I guarantee you that this request is a vast development from the last two appeals, and I am ready to settle this issue affirmatively. [[User:BrickMaster02|BrickMaster02]] ([[User talk:BrickMaster02#top|talk]]) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
((unblock reviewed |1=Looking back, I should not have done what I did. I fully acknowledge the causes behind my block, those being edit disputes, ill advised and lack of editing summaries and excessive use of warnings toward newcomers, and I want you to understand that I sincerely regret performing all of them. My commitment is by any means to avoid such behavior in the future and engage myself in a productive collaboration on Wikipedia. Deepfriedokra and other editors have given their opinions on discussions and consensus-building particularly. I am dedicated to taking a step back and discussing any disputes on relevant talk pages in the future, so I can prevent this from happening again. Some concerns raised about civility and collaboration are justifiable, and I am going to sort these problems out moving forward. I cannot promise that this won't happen again, but I am devoted to being cooperative and treating others with dignity. I guarantee you that this request is a vast development from the last two appeals, and I am ready to settle this issue affirmatively. [[User:BrickMaster02|BrickMaster02]] ([[User talk:BrickMaster02#top|talk]]) 19:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))