This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jayda al-Sindhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Hammadsaeed,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
|
Hi Hammadsaeed, I'm KGirlTrucker81, and I noticed you made an edit to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. Your request was either empty, had elements missing, or the edit did not belong at WP:AFC/R, so for now it has been removed. If you would just like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. When you feel ready to file a new request at Articles for creation/Redirects, you can simply click one of these buttons:
If your aim was to create a new article, I recommend you use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Please make sure you also read Your First Article and the Tutorial. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Shah Aqeeq Baba, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HyperGaruda (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shah Aqeeq Baba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Aqeeq Baba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hammadsaeed, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Chris Troutman (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Syed Abdullah Shah Bhukari Jalali Baba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hazrat Syed Mohammad Sharif r.a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Usama Saeed, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Aqeeq Baba, you may be blocked from editing.
You may absolutely not change other users' comments to deletion discussions, to make them say something different from what the user posted. bonadea contributions talk 07:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
In addition:
Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 07:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assia Abdullah.
You have been very specifically warned against violating this guideline and yet you start posting to other AfDs asking people to "vote" for "your article" (it is not a vote, and nobody owns an article). Stop this behaviour immediately. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Vanamonde (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)The article Syed Abdullah Shah Bhukari Jalali Baba has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This page can re add??
Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Hazrat Syed Mohammad Sharif r.a has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Undelete plz Hammadsaeed (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
((unblock|your reason here))
below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hammadsaeed". The reason given for Hammadsaeed's block is: "Vandalism (HG) (3.1.21)".
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding ((unblock | your reason here)) to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17652 was submitted on Mar 01, 2017 08:44:17. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Unblock me
Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=I will never do sock puppetry you can block my all my accounts except this one I just want to save my page [[Shah Aqeeq Baba]] and edit my page because of information but I'll never do silly things I do this things in past because I really don't know the Wikipedia rule about sock puppetry )) Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will never do sock puppetry you can block my all my accounts except this one I just want to save my page Shah Aqeeq Baba and edit my page because of information but I'll never do silly things I do this things in past because I really don't know the Wikipedia rule about sock puppetry
Decline reason:
It's clear you're only here to promote this article. The constant unblock requests, sock puppetry and overall non-understanding of how Wikipedia works leads me to decline this request. As many others have stated, pleas ewait 6 months, without editing, without socking, and come back to request an unblock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It would be for the best if you do not edit/create any of the deleted pages mentioned in the deletion notices on your talk page. Have you other areas that interest you? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. — CactusWriter (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)((unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here)) Hammadsaeed (talk) 06:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will never do sock puppetry you can block my all my accounts except this one I just want to save my page Shah Aqeeq Baba and edit my page because of information but I'll never do silly things
Decline reason:
This was not accidental. This was a deliberate decision by you to set up multiple accounts. And you did so to votestack and to engage in block evasion. You have shown you have no intention of following Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. The best hope for you, and it's a slim one given your abusive behaviour, is to go for WP:SO. That means staying away from Wikipedia for six months. I want to be very clear here, no more editing. No more accounts. At all. ZERO. If you are caught setting up any more accounts, you will not be eligible. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hammadsaeed (talk) 06:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry User: Bonadea Sorry User:Boomer Vial SorryUser: Cactuswriter Hammadsaeed (talk) 06:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry User:Cactus writer Hammadsaeed (talk) 06:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry User:CactusWriter Hammadsaeed (talk) 06:55, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Oath of God now I never do this I mistakenly make more one fake puppet last night User:Hayemet sorry for that but now I understand the rules of Wikipedia and sorry for that because I use Wikipedia just from 2 months so I really don't know the rules of Wikipedia . Now you can believe I'll never do if I'll do so why I say truth about my fake puppet User:Hayemet Now I m sorry user:Boomer Vial But sir unblock me so I can edit my page with some information
Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Now I understand sock puppetry The use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper use is called sock puppetry Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Sir can you please suggest my unblock appeal to an administrator?? Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
user:Boomer vial Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
User:Boomer Vial? Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Mam User:Bonadea I'll add family Lineage of Shah Aqeeq Baba because he was the descendants of Ali And I'll add Hijri date of birth and death And some addition in Life portion And something more... Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
And I'll make new page of Shah Aqeeq's brother pages and also his father page please mam unblock me Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
And I'll write the stories of some-people who has cured spiritualy by annuctiations in Shah Aqeeq Baba Shrine Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
And i love to edit Saints page because they are friends of God 😊 Hammadsaeed (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17668 was submitted on Mar 03, 2017 09:33:24. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 09:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
If Boomer I really not understand the policies so why i say the truth to you about my last sock puppet??? Oath of God Again I'll never do this.But i want to edit my page.and Sufis page Hammadsaeed (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
It mean you are not unblock me right user:Boomer Hammadsaeed (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
User:Boomer Vial Hammadsaeed (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
I'll Wait if it was 6 days but 6 months are you out the worldHammadsaeed (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammadsaeed, Yamla warned you on 3 March 2017 at 12:00 and 12:20 that editing Wikipedia before 6 months had passed would nullify any chance of appeal, yet you started again within a few minutes by editing with the account Rehman Badami. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17684 was submitted on Mar 05, 2017 08:06:57. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Yamla CactusWriter This one might have to be bumped to a global block, as Hammadsaeed is up to the same old tricks on the Simple English version of Wikipedia. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 08:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18363 was submitted on May 24, 2017 07:09:56. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
This user has now been banned from WP:UTRS for a period of one year. --Yamla (talk) 11:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It's been a long time since I was blocked. I was communicated by the admin who blocked me that I could ask for revoking of this block after six months. During this period, I've learned the main reason the block on me i.e. sockpuppetry. I assure everyone that I will not resort to this in future. I also assure positive and constructive edits as well as a friendly approach for all my fellow Wikipedians. Bukhari (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per discussion on the noticeboard, as linked below, you do not qualify for the standard offer at this time. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have taken your request for the standard offer to the administrators' noticeboard. This is now up to the community. GoldenRing (talk) 17:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
@GoldenRing: Thank you for raising my request to the noticeboard and @Hindustanilanguage: thank you so much for this and many more comments. I am quite upset with @KrakatoaKatie: for "These edits share a similar focus on Sufism", i am not interested in sufism now, Currently i'm active on urwiki and i started Christianity project on urwiki and wants to complete this template red links and many more (John of Damascus on urwiki). I have requested here with good intensions and i waited for six months without sockpuppetry, but some of users are not agree with me. I assure you (all opponents) i'll not do any mistakes (vandalism and sockpuppetry). Mistakes can be happen after all i'm a human being. Give me second chance and a last chance i assure you all i'll make constructive edits, in case of sockpuppetry or vandalism confirmation any admin can block me indefinitely.Bukhari (talk) 10:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
@Samee: thanks alot for making Imam-ud-Din Shahbaz on my request can you please write this article in detail? Thanks in advance. :) — Bukhari (Talk!) 14:28, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
This resets the six month counter. The soonest you can apply for an unblock is now 2018-07-24. --Yamla (talk) 14:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hammad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
During the past several months i have realised that i have committed mistakes and i will not repeat the same mistakes (i.e. sockpuppetry, violation of WP:BLOCK, bad behaviour) and i assure that no harmful or destructive activity will take place no sort of vandalism, no sort of sock puppetry or any type of rubbish stuff will be seen.— Bukhari (Talk!) 18:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; the community discussion linked below will determine whether the block will be lifted. Huon (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(talk) 10:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Per WP:CIR. BukhariSaeed who couldn't understand WP:SOCK even after months of the block,[3] and he was asking other editors to proxy for him. It is clear that it is going to be very hard to teach him the policies and guidelines whenever he will do anything wrong. It is also apparent on Urdu Wikipedia that he is indulged in off-wiki canvassing there.[4] Above unblock request is too unconvincing because it doesn't show what he will do if he was unblocked. Raymond3023 (talk) 18:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
BukhariSaeed, could you tell us a bit about what kind of editing you would be doing if you are unblocked? Could you give an example of an article, or several, you would want to edit, and say something about what you would like to add or change? --bonadea contributions talk 09:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Per this discussion, you have been unblocked.
NOTE
This does not mean you are off the hook. As part of your unblock, you are not allowed to edit any pages about saints or other religious figures, broadly construed. You are also not allowed to create new pages in the Article space - you must use the Articles for creation process. Both of these restrictions can be appealed after six months, but if you break either of them, or are otherwise disruptive, you will be indefinitely blocked again and you will need a very good reason to get unblocked again.
If you have any questions or doubts about what you are doing, please feel free to ask me or another administrator to weigh in on the situation. Primefac (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I removed the blocked notice that was on your userpage because your unblocked and someone forgot to remove it Abote2 (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello BukhariSaeed,
You deleted the Arabic language in the Infobox of the country Pakistan.
I understand that many Pakistanis don`t like Arabs or the Arab language because many Arabs in countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council don`t treat Pakistanis in an appropriate manner and don`t show respect for Pakistanis. However, this should not be a reason for deleting the Arabic language in the Infobox. It is true that the Arabic language is not spoken in Pakistan (it didn`t say in the Infobox that Arabic is a spoken language in Pakistan). Nevertheless, the Arabic language is mentioned in the constitution of Pakistan. The source for this information was mentioned.
So, it doesn`t matter if Arabic is spoken in Pakistan or not. It only matters if the Arabic language is mentioned in the constitution of Pakistan or not.
Maybe you know that 48% of the people in Pakistan speak Punjabi as a first language and only 8% speak Urdu as a first language. But it doesn't make sense to delete Urdu and to mention Punjabi as the official language of Pakistan on Wikipedia. Because it only matters what is mentioned in the constitution of Pakistan and according to the constitution of Pakistan only Urdu and English are the official languages of Pakistan.
The majority in South Sudan still speak Juba Arabic but the government of South Sudan deleted the Arabic language as an official language in 2011. In addition, the Arabs in Israel speak Arabic as their first language but the government of Israel deleted the Arabic language as an official language in 2018. These things are facts no matter if you like it or not.
Wikipedia should be based on facts and it is important to indicate always reliable sources for all information. Wikipedia should not be based on opinions. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense.
I would be happy if you reply.
Best regards,
Tom --Tom112233 (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
I am very impressed by your edits on the urdu wiki: was wondering if you could improve the article about the 2013 elections? Currently it only shows the vote bank rather than seats... thanks... маsтегрнатаLк 21:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Do you have source that Imran Khan began Communication minister in August 2018? The official website have been just updated. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - - | ||
---|---|---|
Hi, Hammad, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads. | ||
As you have shown an interest in article related to Indian roads we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions. | ||
We look forward to welcoming you to the project ! To join the project please click here |
naveenpf (talk) 01:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I note that you insist that Barham Salih is the 9th President of Iraq. You have also changed the sequence on the List of Presidents of Iraq. Please provide me an argument on why such an edit is viable. I have provided that Interim Presidents shall not be counted. If this logic follows then we need to add Dick Cheney to the List of Presidents of the United States since he served as an acting President for sometime. Ghazi Yawar was an interim President during the Interim Government of Iraq established by the United States. I don't see why are you counting him as the 6th President. I appreciate an answer. --Broosk (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)