Hello, The Mysterious LV Contributer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 17:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
Youtube's not a reliable source as anyone can post. Apart from a link to the game, that's all you've got and I'm afraid it isn't enough.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
The above is an automated reply. I wanted to let you know that a page for that galaxy already exists under its "full name", found here. Enwebb (talk) 23:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I wanted to let you know that your signature design might cause problems for some readers. This is because the images in your signature as seen e.g. here, here, and here violates WP:SIGIMAGE. The current signature contains this link: User:IloveRumania#/talk and it does not make much sense; User talk:IloveRumania would be a better idea. The yellow text string Yes, I know my signature is a license plate. linking to your contributions is virtually unreadable, see WP:SIGAPP, and it's not very relevant, is it? Please fix these issues. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines and policy on customising signatures. Thank you. SamSailor 09:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As things currently stand, your customized signature does not conform to
one of our policies which completely prohibits usage of any image in one's signature.
Thus, please remove the images from your signature.
another of our policies which demands that signature appearance shall abide by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines which specify a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for text.FYI, the current yellow-colored text has a ratio of 1.1:1.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
Basically all your sources are just citing BFDI. You cannot simply cite the subject talking about itself, we don't care what people/groups say about their own selves, we care about outside perspective.
To get this approved, you'd have to cite news media, entertainment journals, etc. saying "hey, this BFDI is interesting and here's why". If nobody is saying that, then we don't have anything to base the article on.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
Hello, IloveRumania!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:
The additional reference you provide is to wikia, which is user generated and can not be considered an independent, reliable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle for Dream Island, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
Thanks for uploading File:IloveRumania (Signature 6).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Hi IloveRumania, I have just reviewed your new article and added sources from scientific journals. Please note that Youtube videos of someone talking about something do not make good or reliable sources and are therefore inadequate to substantiate the contents of a Wikipedia article. Sources of choice in the field of academia are publications in relevant journals, books or reports in popular scientific media. I have updated the article accordingly.pseudonymJake Brockmantalk 10:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The editing timeline between your main "IloveRumania" account and the "Evil IloveRumania" account were perfectly in-line between the both of you. The "disruption" you had "User:Evil IloveRumania" leave on your talk page here was what started triggering my suspicious that you were playing with a "good hand" and a "bad hand"... The behaviors and actions made by your "good account" and in direct response to the Evil IloveRumania account were absolutely suspicious and and very unusual for an what account that's having a blatantly disruptive user harassing them. They were out-of-place and very unusual given typical circumstances. Hence, given the evidence I've gathered, I've blocked both of your accounts for violating Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy. ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 16:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.