I undid your edit in the Quantum clock wiki page. In the case of the article, 37 is just an arbitrary number and it doesn't actually hold any significant meaning other than showing the power (magnitude) of this clock. Thank you for all of your hard work that you have put into Wikipedia. :) --Triesault (talk) 09:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hallo there Mr. Triesault,
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Popper is using the word 'apples' in no way which depends upon the actual fact that it is an 'apple', it could be a pear or banana. The fact that apples are often used for these kind of examples is neither here nor there, and is certainly not relevant to the page apple (symbolism) which is all about the religious symbolism of the apple, which is not relevant to Popper's example which is talking about falsification. Thus the pipelink is unnecessary as it directs the user to a page which has no bearing upon the original and will not serve to heighten factual understanding of the issue. I hope you agree with my logic, Reichsfürst (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Reichsfürst (talk),
Thanks for declaring yourself available for help.
I researched [1][2] about Antony Flew, William Hare and Basil Mitchell as you suggested me and encountered eventually the "begging the question" logical fallacy.
It was astonishing to found so many pipelinks like:
Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major fields |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foundations | |||||
Lists |
| ||||
in the wikipedia article.
Yes, it was nice to see that you found the whole conversation enjoyable too.
I am finding it interesting indeed as well.
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 08:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Reichsfürst (talk),
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 06:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced material to articles, or start discussions in the article using commented-out text, as you did with your edits here and here to Digital Fortress. Adding unsourced material to articles is a violation of Wikipedia's policies on Verifiability and No Original Research. These are core policies known to every experienced editor, and are not "hidden". You are more than free to start a discussion on the talk page if you wish, but that burden is not mine, nor am I obligated to ask for your permission to uphold these policies, as you indicated in your note. That section is for foreign language editions of the novel, and not foreign Wikipedia articles on it, as it clearly states. Links to foreign Wikipedia articles on the novel are already given in the lefthand sidebar, just as they are in every article.
There was also no reason to add a line break between the Hungarian edition of the book and the citation for it. Nightscream (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I have agreed with your edit of today, and I have shown my support by following your revision today, with a 'token' edit, in order to leave an edit summary comment to that effect. However, I do not understand your comment. Which decision? Please clarify.
-- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
(cur | prev) 10:33, May 30, 2012 Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk | contribs) . . (109,031 bytes) (+2) . . (→Depiction of stereotypes: I can see no problem with retaining this dablink added by the previous editor) (undo) (cur | prev) 10:17, May 30, 2012 Maurice Carbonaro (talk | contribs) m . . (109,029 bytes) (+4) . . (→Depiction of stereotypes: Hyperlinked "(...) Italian Americans (...)". Please feel free to undo this change... motivating... if possible, your decision. Thanks.) (undo) (cur | prev) 04:00, May 30, 2012 RepublicanJacobite (talk | contribs) . . (109,025 bytes) (+171) . . (Various fixes in infobox.) (undo)