|
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give James Bond 007 (1997 video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 18:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give The World Is Not Enough (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give 007: Quantum of Solace (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 9th British Academy Video Games Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Wallace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Escapist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of Borg 11:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Password (UK game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Was It Something I Said? (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Stella (UK TV series) episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Edwards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Morecambe & Wise Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Neverrainy,
Lead sections summarize its articles. So on The Order: 1886, having a separate paragraph in the lead that mentions how the game was received is very much appropriate and necessary for the article. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 09:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dishonored (series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dishonored (series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The1337gamer (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homefront (series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homefront (series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give The Morecambe & Wise Show (1968–1977) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into The Morecambe & Wise Show. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title (*)), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ubcule (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi again,
When merging content from several articles, please make clear in the edit summary that this is what you're doing.
In this edit, you merge the content of the List of The Morecambe & Wise Show (1978–1983) episodes article, but the source isn't mentioned, so it isn't entirely obvious (upon first glance) that you're not the author.
In this case a note such as
or something along those lines would do the job.
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Forza Motorsport (video game) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Forza Motorsport. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erika Harlacher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Harlacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 18:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Our manual of style contains specific guidance on the presentation of times in Wikipedia articles. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Brianna Knickerbocker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 18:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brianna Knickerbocker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Knickerbocker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 21:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, your edit summaries seem to imply that I have given no reason for removing the ratings from the table, but I have done so every time. We are using 28-day ratings this year as they are available from BARB and are a more true figure as to who is watching the show. For example, I watched bootcamp on the ITV Hub 11 days after it was broadcast, so my viewing would be reported in the 28-day figure but not the 7-day figure. So can you please not add any ratings until the 28-day data becomes available. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 11:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring, thanks. This should not be changed. Please discuss on the article's talk page instead. However, your reasoning that ITV+1 is a different timeslot does not matter, as ITV Hub can be watched at any time, not in the original time slot, and if the figure wasn't a true rating, BARB would not provide it. So please stop, or you could end up blocked from editing. Thanks. anemoneprojectors 14:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Neverrainy, I brought your request to full RM, just an FYI. — Andy W. (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Neverrainy. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
I would strongly caution about automatically adding awards tables to VG articles. If there are already existing awards tables, it makes sense to group awards, but this is a preference of whether to use one or not (and we have no VG guidelines to require them). There's a few recent tables that you've added for one or two awards, which is better summarized in prose. A dozen-some awards, on the other hand, likely would be best as a table but still would be good to check. --MASEM (t) 03:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Read them. I already explain this to you before. I'm amazed that you continue to ignore them. --The1337gamer (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm NOTNOTABLE. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 3-2-1 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 20:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Aside from the current accusations about you in a current case at SPI, I see at the TimeSplitters move discussion, you were twice caught trying to stack votes in favor of your own proposal, despite warnings not to do so. This is entirely unacceptable. If there are any more scenarios involving you logging out and editing anonymously in order to manipulate discussions and scenarios like this, your account is going be blocked from editing for a bit. There's no excuse for games like that. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:TimeSplitters (series) while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You have been told about this previously and so consider this a final warning. You must not intentionally logout to edit as an IP address instead of with your account, as that constitutes an attempt to mislead and a violation of policy. If you continue doing this after this warning, your account (and potentially the range of IP addresses you are using) will be blocked. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Neverrainy. I noticed that you created Street Fighter Collection 2 as a redirect to itself. I assume this was a mistake, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit it to redirect wherever it was supposed to go. Thanks! —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, State of Decay 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at State of Decay 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to State of Decay 2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The1337gamer (talk) 19:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Please stop removing sourced content, as you did to Ballerina (2016 film). -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
In this edit, you added Vgrelease template, which is perfectly fine. You used NA= and EU= for the parameters. Please be aware this syntax is being depreciated soon. The syntax is now NA| and EU|, like the Vgrelease new template. They have been merged following a TfD. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Destroy All Humans! (series)#Requested move 13 January 2017. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
In your edits to Grabbed by the Ghoulies ([1][2]), you removed the Japanese release date from the article's body and you linked to a WP:VG/RELEASE guideline for such removal. However, it seems you have misused that guideline you've pointed out to because WP:VG/RELEASE actually says: "Releases in non-English countries should otherwise not be included in the infobox, but if determined to be necessary to include, can be discussed further in the article's body." That is, the Japanese release dates should not be included in the infobox, but it should be included in the article's body. Thanks. – Hounder4 13:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced release dates to upcoming films, as you did in this edit. If you're getting your information from the IMDb, please be aware that this is not a reliable source, as it's user-generated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on my talk page. I just made an edit to the article Fist Fight using the referencing template that you suggested and with a more detailed edit summary.The Editor 155 (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from SOCOM without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 11:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I noted that you changed several release dates in the infobox at the The Operative: No One Lives Forever article (November 9, 2000 → November 11, 2000, April 18, 2002 → April 16, 2002, and November 21, 2002 → November 11, 2002). Could you provide reliable sources for these claims, please? Cheers! Lordtobi (✉) 13:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Styx: Shards of Darkness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Destruction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Why did you change the review table that separated the consoles to their individual reviews? GamerPro64 17:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be right that Template:Headhunter series ought to be deleted -- I don't have an opinion about that now. But if you want it to be deleted, you would need to take it to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion because it is a template, not an article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest 2014, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A consensus decision was reached and resulted in the presentation style of the split result tables. Your changes are deviating away from the decision which was agreed upon. Wes Wolf Talk 23:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest 2013. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Wes Wolf Talk 23:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2012, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Wes Wolf Talk 23:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2011. Seriously, you need to stop. You are now close to being blocked. Wes Wolf Talk 23:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wes Wolf Talk 23:57, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
What are you doing? you're just moving stuff around the page back and forth. Nuobgu (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
You have just admonished me for "disruptive editing" of Adam West, yet I'm unclear about why my edits constitute disruptive editing. Adam West has just passed away, warranting the update. Tmnh07 (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
This revision violates the manual of style, and has been undone. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Digifan23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gladiators (1992 UK TV series) Series Two without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Digifan23 (talk) 07:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Please see the talkpage of this article. A requested move ended earlier today showing that it should remain at My Life as a Courgette. Please use the WP:RM process if you wish to move an article in the future, if it's possible it could be challenged. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Why did you move the page to its Japanese title? It's known as simply Everybody's Golf in English markets, and therefore is the WP:COMMONNAME. I moved it back, and unless you can give a good, policy-backed reason for it, it should stay that way. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 23:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Price Is Right (UK game show), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please stop removing content and replacing it with "???". AldezD (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
You're recent edit to The Apprentice (UK TV series) has been reverted, for adding in excessive details than is needed. If such information is wanted, you would also have to detail out re-runs with it as well. The overview should just focus on certain details, and not this. GUtt01 (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Gran Turismo Sport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Niche-gamer 14:15, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Neverrainy, if you continue to do edits like this that remove prose from clearly reliable sources, I'm going to issue a block. You've got a long history of editing problems and the recent edit warring with the IP on car-related video games is something you don't need warned about. -- ferret (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Burnout 3: Takedown, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I couldn't discuss this issue earlier, just because I have a large ammount of things to juggle on Wikipedia, but back in October I made some edits to the Gran Turismo Sport page which you reverted. The issues I have was that the article went into unnecessary detail about the demo contrary to what usually is the case, and now that the game's out it really does not serve a purpose to describe what's in it. I also seperated "development and release" to two seperate sections as is the norm, and I'm realy unclear as to why you changed that back. Can you explain? --Deathawk (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Neverrainy! I noticed that on November 22 you removed several soundtrack sections from video game articles. The edit summaries all said "WP:VGSCOPE. No track listings." The article guidelines for WikiProject Video games do not categorically prohibit soundtrack sections and some sections had track lists, while others did not, so it unclear what you meant by "No track listings." For now, I've gone ahead and reinstated some of those sections. I suggest you look over item #15, "Non-notable soundtracks" under WP:VGSCOPE and review the articles again. Best, – Zntrip 18:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Neverrainy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19990 was submitted on Dec 08, 2017 05:50:00. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eurovision Song Contest, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 08:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello Neverrainy: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neversoft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N-Gage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Through the Keyhole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caprice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed through new page patrol that you created a variety of articles for the Army Men series of games. I have reverted these to redirects because they all had no references or citations. The series is clearly notable and it wouldn't surprise me if many or all of the entires you made were also notable. However, with-out references to reliable sources it can be hard to tell. If you decide to still work on these articles, please make sure you add citations to reliable sources to help show their notability. Ping me here or leave me a message on my talk if I can answer any questions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Bullseye (UK game show). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop adding unsourced content. AldezD (talk) 11:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. -- ferret (talk) 01:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Taskmaster episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taskmaster episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matt14451 (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi I saw a lot of recent big changes you made to List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 please discuss these changes here before reverting. Thank you. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 02:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out with re-doing the Test Drive Series pages and other related pages, but there are a few things which I needed to change for you:
Atari isn’t the publisher for V-Rally 3 (apart from the PC version) or TD Overdrive. Infogrames is still the publisher, they just used the Atari name as a brand label at the time before they properly renamed themselves.
As for TD Overdrive, I had to change it back to that name as the game was developed in the UK and that is what the name is there.
Still, good job dispite some misinformation. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating V-Rally.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.
Thank you for creating the page with multiple reliable, independent sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I have seen by a pure chance you merged MX vs. ATV: On the Edge into MX vs. ATV Unleashed. While I understand the "PSP port" reasoning into this, it is a valid spinoff, in sense it has a completely different title, console wise it's not a direct port (handheld vs regular console), and was reviewed separately and treated separately by the reputable video game sites (6 linked WP:VG/RS references with links and more without). I understand merging things that have bare notability or none at all, but this seems fairly notable on it's own and should be treated as such (passes WP:GNG easily). So please, either seek a talk page consensus for merge, or nominate it to AfD. Thank you. I have also seen you did the same with ATV Offroad Fury Pro and ATV Offroad Fury: Blazin' Trails, both of which seem to be fairly notable games independent of the parent game. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Hitman HD Enhanced Collection, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy,
Thanks for creating Terror Towers! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please add your references and why this is notable.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Boleyn))
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Terror Towers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Sony Movies Classic does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You made three unexplained edits in a row. One of them was just reverted by an IP, who explained why they were doing what they were doing--as far as I'm concerned, that's the proper way to do it. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Hitman HD Enhanced Collection.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Beat the Chef. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, MotoGP 2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 05:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Terror Towers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:MotoGP 2 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 03:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Terror Towers".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Launchballer 23:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MotoGP 2".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, That's My Dog, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 06:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Hello, Neverrainy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "That's My Dog".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I doubt you even checked the infobox stuff, like I said. All you did was remove my talk page post with no reasoning and didn't even answer any of my questions. Here's the link and everything I said to you is right. It says "Original distributor", and the BBC can be used as a production company because they produce their own shows. I've seen you've been blocked before, so I really wouldn't want you getting all stubborn just because you won't get your own way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_television
Luigitehplumber (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)