The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp×g 07:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]
The page contains relevant and useful information about a business that is in the business of promoting Free Software, fairly traded and organic products, and various community coops and artists. The only promotion that the caffe engages in is the unselfserving kind.
Linuxcaffe has received a fair amount of attention for these very reasons:
http://business.newsforge.com/business/06/03/07/1556230.shtml?tid=39
http://digg.com/linux_unix/New_linux_cafe_opens_in_Toronto
http://www.linuxcaffe.com/node/228"So within 48 hours, 3 major news networks, covering high-tech/ open source/ WiFi stories, decided independently that linuxcaffe was a good place to start."
If putting a link to the caffe website was the reason for deletion, that's easily changed. Please reconsider? Would removing the business template on the right be of any use?
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 04:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An experimental short film that documents the obstacles and challenges most Macanese endure when developing a career in the creative industry. The article and this AfD document the obstacles that self-promoters face in trying to get articles into Wikipedia. Was speedily deleted once as spam. -- RHaworth 23:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self-published cosmology researcher, fails WP:NOR (and probably WP:NOTABILITY and WP:COI too). Related AfDs/VfDs at Talk:Pelastration/Delete (from 2003) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehran Keshe. Demiurge 00:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mildly entertaining, but hardly Wikipedic. Stammer 08:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it seems to me a lot of the Wikipedia "experts" don't accept reality. My puzzles are real and sold in many countries. And I had a lot of counterfeith too. I am an inventor and you can check more than 130 patent applications on databases on Internet. I have a lot of officially registered USA copyrights, starting from 1986. My puzzles were exhibited on the World Expo of 1992 in Sevilla and 1996 in Portugal in the Pavillions of Belgium. You need to have a very good product to be invited there by the Belgian authorities. But in fact: What is the problem? Mu6 23:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. . Aksi_great (talk) 11:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotion piece written by Mathew.tully. -- RHaworth 00:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 02:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This person does not pass WP:BIO at all AW 08:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Monadic predicate calculus. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 00:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Dictionary definition; if this is useful, it should be transwikied to Wiktionary. Septentrionalis 00:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 22:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Connecticut does have a coast, but it does not define a "Region." In fact it was made up as an agglomeration of smaller Connecticut "Regions," which reflect some planner or tourism official's idea of what needed to exist - neither Coastal Connecticut nor its "constituent parts" would likely be recognized by state residents. Jd2718 08:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related page because it is also an artificial region, invented by agglomerating smaller, artificial regions.[reply]
Jd2718 08:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. —Mets501 (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC, scarce results on google. Though it's a poor resource, Last.fm indicates extremely little (2~3 plays each track) play. Crunk 19:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If someone wants to write a sourced article on this scam martial art, they are free to write one. But this version isn't it, and for this reason it needs to go. Kimchi.sg 06:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete Non-notable advertisement. It appears that aside from un-named elite mercenary units units this art is only taught by one person and the web site is really just a commercial link. Read marketing gimik.Peter Rehse 02:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 18:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Radio show presenter. This article has no sources for its notability, though he seems likely to be included. Peter O. (Talk) 16:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let's just call this no consensus and close the debate, as it seems quite split. --Wizardman 17:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn by the nominator. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 03:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The notability of many web comics is up for debate, but I'm of the opinion that this one is not too verifiable in terms of webcomics. Delete (or, if that's too far, a list of web comics including some of the "notable" ones that just aren't notable enough to have articles). A Link to the Past (talk) 01:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While his comic is not updating regularly, it is part of the history of webcomics. It should remain.
The result was semi-speedy delete. -- Steel 17:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable product made by a non-notable company, which was deleted on afd. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Contested prod. MER-C 02:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOW Martinp23 02:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody's warmed-over sermon. Too bad this can't be speedied. Denni talk 02:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 04:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can determine this is a neologism. No relevant independent Ghits here. Da Pigeon Coup is the handle of a linguistic group in the field but not related to this definition. Fails WP:V. Delete. BlueValour 02:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 00:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet the standards of WP:BIO. Basic 'claim to fame' is that he wrote an anti-Semitic book discussed here. The book gets about 9 ghits. Ryu Ota/Ota Ryu get around 200 combined ghits. Antonrojo 02:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 04:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete; however, I've merged the content into Bay Shore, New York so this is being kept as a redirect for GFDL compliance. I could do a page history merge but it's always tricky so I'd prefer not to. JYolkowski // talk 22:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not make any claim to notability. The houses that it lists are all in red links, and the "home of Zsa Zsa Gabor"? This should be deleted for failing notability. Diez2 03:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 00:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No notability. Her most known role is in Blue Heelers? This utterly fails WP:BIO. Diez2 03:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal-ball. Aksi_great (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No possible way to get verifiable sources, Fable 2 isn't out yet. Amarkov blahedits 03:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Chinese street dictionary article. It describes what Ah Lian is, and then it lists external links. No notability. It's just a dictionary definition. Diez2 03:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge. Technically this is not what AfD should be used for, this should just be a Keep, and leave the actual merger to someone more interested, but very little of the article content wasn't already at Undeniable, so I merged and redirected. Someone more familiar with the subject is welcome to improve my work. AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is simply a re-issue of the album Undeniable, which already has a page on Wikipedia. Therefore, this article should be deleted. Rhythmnation2004 03:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by Yomangani. Whispering 19:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by Vegaswikian. MER-C 07:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Speedy Delete per MER-C. This article was created by single purpose account user named Evergreensuk. It is an obvious advertisement. Lovelac7 03:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 22:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article has only 832 Google hits, and the article appears to be an autobiography, based on the author's name. Both the author and the anon who de-proded this article have no edits outside of this article. Scobell302 03:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. IMDB only has about 5 appearances from him, and none of them being in any sort of notable role. Diez2 03:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 18:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN professor per WP:PROF and WP:BIO generally. Although he seems to have won internal teaching awards from his university, I really don't think that kind of thing can make a prof notable. The guy sounds like a great teacher, but that's not a reason to have an article on him in an encyclopedia -- even one that isn't paper. Has published a couple of books, but (1) nothing much is said about it in the article, and (2) that doesn't make his publication record especially much one way or the other. Mangojuicetalk 04:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 01:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is almost utter nonsense. Also, the only source is in Latin, so no one can really verify it. Finally, this could be a possible violation of WP:HOAX. Diez2 04:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Professional wrestling term made internet wrestling community. I put it up for prod a while back, Unfocused removed the template saying there was no reason it shouldn't be an article and that there was only a need for sources. Since the term is a term created by an internet community, it's unlikely that any information is verifiable with published reliable sources. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and there's not much that can be said about the topic other than the definition. Article is also unlikely to be more than a stub since the "SmackDown Six" only existed for about a year. Any relevant information could be merged into WWE Friday Night SmackDown! if necessary. --Jtalledo (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 02:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion Fails WP:V. Can't find supporting reliable references for this on google or google books. This is the only unreliable source I can find[23]. Yes, its African, so potentially WP:BIAS issues in searching for references. On the other hand, its purportedly a sweet, edible fruit - information on which should be quite readily available unless this is an obscure slang word. Bwithh 04:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as non-notable. Although a number of people suggested merge, there doesn't appear to be any notable information in the article to merge. —Doug Bell talk 19:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason this needs to have its own page. If this information MUST be included on wikipedia (I think it is trivial at best) then it can be merged to the Bam Margera page. Ocatecir 04:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as attack page. Kimchi.sg 06:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious vanity/nonsense page. Previous attempts at speedy-deletion and prod have been unsuccessful, so moving to AfD. --Elonka 05:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion Fails WP:V, and even if verified may fail WP:CORP ("one of the" largest supermarket chains in India but only manages US$1.5mm in annual sales?). Zero relevant hits on Factiva (which includes several leading Indian English-language newspapers) for Abida Kabir Mart, AKM and A King Mart. Can't find any relevant hits on google. India has a large and vibrant English language media industry, and English is its main language for internet use, so sources should be available online if this chain really is prominent (sources need to prove prominence of course). No Apu jokes, please. Bwithh 05:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BIO - crz crztalk 05:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. --humblefool® 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like some park organization. My question I want to ask, is it notable enough in the sense of an encyclopedia. And if so, we need to cleanup the external link frenzy... and the article. Note, most of the citations come from the organizations own website. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 09:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Neighborhood Parks Council is environmental organization representative of over 100 parks groups in San Francisco. There are many other environmental organizations listed in Wikipedia, so I don't see how this one is any different. I am new to Wikipedia, so any feedback is welcome. Maybe I'm trying too hard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolframald (talk • contribs) 09:50, November 12, 2006
The Neighborhood Parks Council is ten years old, and just celebrated its ten year anniversary. The organization is actually a coalition of several hundred park and green open space groups in San Francisco. Isabel Wade, founder of the organization, has been one of the most important green leaders in San Francisco, and is one of the founders of the Friends of the Urban Forest and also the National Aids Memorial Grove located in Golden Gate park. The organization is located at 451 Hayes Street in San Francisco. The phone number is 415.621.3260. With regard to content of the Wikipedia entry, efforts were made to use original language and not to replicate information available elsewhere on the web. Numerous links are now included in the article to other parks and relevant topics that are central to the work of this organization. Yes, the folks who created these entries are Wikipedia newbies and would very much appreciate feedback with regard to style, content, and linkage.
The result was no consensus. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 08:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion Fails WP:BIO Resume-spam for daytime soap writer. Two-time Daytime Emmy and Writers Guild of America Award nominee. Bwithh 05:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:yrgh 19 Nov. 06: DON'T DELETE: Snyder has been writing on soaps since the late 80s; almost 20 years now. This is NOT spam as suggested by another user. Snyder IS notable! Her current position is on B&B, a show seen by at least 6.4 million adults in North America! (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:(({1))}|(({1))}]] ([[User talk:(({1))}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/(({1))}|contribs]])
The result was weak keep. The article needs to be cleaned up. —Doug Bell talk 19:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion nomination San Francisco chocolate maker of questionable encyclopedic notability. Fails WP:CORP. Possible corporate spam too. Bwithh 05:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 02:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non-notable, unreferenced neologism. Does not meet WP:NEO. Elonka 05:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —Doug Bell talk 19:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not demonstrate that the subject yet meets our generally accepted criteria for inclusion of biographies. He is a published professor but all professors publish. There is no evidence that he passes the "average professor test".
Note: This article was previously discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lewis (philosopher). That decision was closed in Aug 2005 as "no consensus". The article remains essentially unimproved since that time. Rossami (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable band. Missvain 05:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep due to withdrawn nomination. No idea why I couldn't find anything. -Amarkov blahedits 16:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable short story, I can't find any references. Amarkov blahedits 06:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, perhaps bordering on no consensus. The outcome is the same regardless. Mackensen (talk) 12:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listcruft U15896 06:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC) — U15896 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 02:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Notable band. Pretty sure they fail WP:MUSIC. Missvain 06:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Good work, people. DS 18:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(Delete - per above
Hopefully, I can bring forth a few more later, but I have to go right now.-- danntm T C 22:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I thus believe, Hitber's Law is well used in British news media, and satisfies WP:V, WP:CITE, and WP:CITE.-- danntm T C 23:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi.sg 14:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable company, seems a bit spammy. I prodded it and it was removed by an anon IP. My nom is Delete Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 06:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted as non-notable, WP:BIO refers. How did this get to AfD? (aeropagitica) 10:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Its just some guy that is posting pure vandalism Eggy49er 07:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
is this notable? its certainly not very interesting. Xorkl000 07:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-19 08:31Z
Not a real article. Its just vandalism Eggy49er 07:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 02:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article was accidentally speedied in vandalized state. A deletion review overturned the deletion but called for a proper AfD. Prior AfD in January was closed as "no consensus". Procedural listing, so I abstain. trialsanderrors 07:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted as a ((db-repost)) of deleted material. (aeropagitica) 10:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obvious WP:NEO, WP:NFT, possibly some sort of WP:COI page. Blatantly fails WP:RS. Not even worth wasting the time bringing it to AfD, but I can't find an appropriate speedy criterion, and it's a contested PROD, so here we are. --Kinu t/c 08:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as copyvio from [33]. Kimchi.sg 14:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical content taken directly from the website. While the content is autobiographical, there has been an attempt made to show importance to the music industry - however, there have been no citations or major improvements to the page since creation. Sigma 7 08:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --MCB (talk) 21:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Producer of dubious notability. Sources provided are either self-published, make no mention of the subject, or double back to Wikipedia. No independent sources to verify claims made in the article. DarkAudit (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A little research -- IMDb shows many credits for Dr. Ruth, none credited as "The Dr. Ruth Show". "Real Stories" and "AfterDrive" both listed, neither lists Mr. Salomon in credits. "Melina" appears to be a long-standing "work in progress" that has never been produced. Atlantic Overseas Pictures has no credits to their name.69.60.13.146 (talk)
"flower of the fence" is being produced this fall. budget is 12ml. please see attched links.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117956024.html?categoryid=1443&cs=1
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i2d2333041a2e651010d72caa9272ecb0
famous footsteps was co executive produced by salomon and wirth. salomon- wirth productions is credited as production company.
The result was delete Lots of Wikipedians like it, but no evidence was presented that it meets WP:WEB. W.marsh 00:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:WEB criteria for notability. The article does not attempt to meet the criteria. The article is undersourced and contains weasel words. Alexa shows that it may have been popular in 2000 but its rank has dropped steadily since its inception as a website. Ultimately, just not seeing its validity as an article. ju66l3r 09:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 23:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. By deleting the info that violates this information, you are left with no further info than the Bateau Bay, New South Wales page. Todd661 09:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly more noteable than your average telephone pole, I guess, but really not noteable enough to be in an encyclopedia Descendall 09:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A prior AfD from April was overturned at deletion review and is listed here now for repeat consideration. Procedural listing, so I abstain. ~ trialsanderrors 09:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted by Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh. -Amarkov blahedits 16:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP in every way. Prod was removed. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are the company's founders. These two assert minor notability though (wrote DeadAIM, was a radio DJ).
Demiurge 10:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 00:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article seems non-notable. Possible conflict of interest? Marm(t) 11:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per this discussion and previous referenced AfD on Doxbridge. —Doug Bell talk 20:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see how this is notable. There's no suggestion that there are any external sources that mention it and google only throws up the Junior Common Rooms of the Oxford, Cambridge and Durham colleges. It's claim to be the biggest collegiate sporting tournament is backed up only by its own website and isn't that impressive when you think that there are only six collegiate universities in England anyway. As for the word 'Doxbridge' - its a hideous neologism --Robdurbar 11:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1.articles which are not deleted usually grow in time. The article on my secondary school being a great example 2. Usually only a word not liked by Oxbridge people thinking Durham is trying to add themsleves to their portmanteau. 3. A nice addition to Durham University navigation box thing which wikipedians have clearly worked hard on 4. Passes the google test and I tihnk it improves the Durham Unversity article. Generally just makes wikipedia closer to being the sum of all human knowledge. - unsigned comment by User:Francium12
PS I am not affiliated in anyway to the tournament, nor have I ever been to it (nor do I plan to) - not that that should matter anyway!!!!!!! Logica 01:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No references given, no assertion of notibility. ElectricEye (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete YARP YARP YARP YARP YARP YARP YARP YARP DS 19:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable slang term. Does not pass WP:NEO, either. Previous attempts at speedy and prod have been unsuccessful. --Elonka 12:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An unpublished work of fiction. Non-notable, unverifiable. Weregerbil 12:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only one source, person's own website, cited. No indication that this passes WP:BAND. Seraphimblade 12:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 00:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unneeded, unnecessary and entirely incomplete page created by a new user, badly written/incoherent anyway. Plenty of Harry Potter articles already available. SynergyBlades 12:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete and possibly merge to streetlight. Deleted since there is very little information or content in the article other than the link to the Image:UrbisZX1a.jpg. —Doug Bell talk 19:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a model of streetlight. Wikipedia is not a collection of random information. -- THLCCD 13:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment Seeing as the consensus is to delete, maybe I should just transwiki them to my wiki on road-related stuff. Anyone agree with this idea?? --SunStar Net 16:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 19:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article admits that this is a protologism; sources do not appear reliable per WP:V. Contested speedy. NawlinWiki 13:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was take to RFD. Kimchi.sg 15:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bill has not been confirmed as being short for William in canon John Reaves 13:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - Yomanganitalk 13:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor character in Saw, does not deserve their own article. CyberGhostface 13:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per other AFDs in this series. Yomanganitalk 13:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor character in Saw who doesn't deserve his own article...also poorly written with some uncited speculations for the next film. CyberGhostface 13:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. W.marsh 23:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly written article on a minor character from Saw who doesn't deserve their own article. CyberGhostface 13:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)\ EDIT If this article were to be seriously improved, I might take away my request for deletion, although I still believe that Zepp isn't deserving of his own article.--CyberGhostface 19:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In all fairness, Zep is one of the more significant characters in the film, maybe the article could be improved. Are there articles for the other characters in the film? The.griffter 17:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by Yomangani. Whispering 19:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by Yomangani . Whispering 19:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Kimchi.sg 15:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Total lack of claims to notability. No sources external of the webcomic author. Geni 14:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Move to main article in comment brackets, then delete. ~ trialsanderrors 05:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A summary of information contained at International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. Article title means no one would reach this page so redirect pointless Nuttah68 14:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 00:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced (WP:NOR, WP:V). Also, WP:NOT a collection of indiscriminate information, namely fictional family trees of cartoon characters. Sandstein 14:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a list of CSI Episodes in the order that they were broadcast by one South Korean network. It adds no encyclopedic information, and is about one step up from a TV broadcast schedule. These are not *Korean* episodes of CSI (that would be something), they are just regular American CSI episodes broadcast by MBC. Furthermore, MBC is not even the only South Korean network to broadcast CSI, which makes this list even less relevant. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; Wikipedia is not a TV schedule. Ergo, please delete. Visviva 15:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. No assertion of notability. Publication on deviantART only, fails WP:WEB Fram 15:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Undelete Akybonko This is still a work in progress and I'm still learning the ropes of using Wikipedia's code. Give me more time to work on this. Also, a comic hosted on deviantArt is no less important than one that has its own site.
Undelete Akybonko OK then, fair enough. Can I just close this page myself or what, since I'm the one who made it in the first place?
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about an album that was supposed to be released months ago, but has been delayed, the name keeps changing and now the album is due to be released sometime next year under a name yet to be decided (see [38]. Donald Albury 15:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT a directory. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Prod text was : "WP:NOT for crystal balling. Add sourced info to the main Dream Theater article, and wait at least until the definitive title is known before creating an article." Article not really improved since. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Nine Inch Nails album Fram 15:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Judging from the formatting, the author is little interested in an encyclopedic article, and it was only created to place a promotional link in the first place. Links to the company were also placed in other articles. Copyright problem, the content was taken from a website, by its owner who wants to release it, not verified. Speedy and prod were contested for that reason. Femto 15:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Widawski 17:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable actresses who are twin sisters. Appearing in a few bit parts in a few movies. No evidence of satisfying WP:BIO. Valrith 16:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 00:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced cruft. 6 ghits for "fabricated self esteem" -wikipedia. Leibniz 16:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cleverly disguised vanity article on a non-notable author written by a WP:SPA. No external sources or assertions of notability. Two books and a few weblogs. Fails WP:BIO. — Moondyne 16:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT a list of jokes. Deprodded by anon. eaolson 16:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as nonsense. cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not know whether this could be speedied or PRODed, but to be safe I brought it here. This page is really nonsense, and contains needless profanity.><RichardΩ612 UW 16:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 23:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable open source project. Web search gives about 12,000 hits [41] and I haven't found a single one that offers third-party media coverage. Not an innovative or trend-setting product. Mikeblas 16:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Inclusion of other articles is not a reason to keep; Mr. Unicorn has to stand or fall on his own merits, which appear to be lacking. Enjoyment of the cartoon argues for Youtube keeping, not Wikipedia. Mackensen (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Flash cartoon. Lots of Google hits due to common terms, but nearly all are blogs or Newgrounds-type links. No major citations in first 100 results or so. Article also appears to be part of a concerned effort to get anything connected with Robert Benfer listed in Wikipedia, all of which have failed multiple AfDs. Author of cartoon is also currently up for AfD as well. Delete. MikeWazowski 16:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Sunday league football team that plays in a non-notable league (the Morden and District League). Agreed policy in WP:CORP is that only teams in levels 1-10 of the English football league system are inherently notable but the league they play in isn't even part of the system, let alone in the top ten levels. Qwghlm 16:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable flash cartoon. Google search on title brings back only 51 unique hits on 116 returns, and nearly half of those are Wiki mirrors. All others trivial references. Delete. MikeWazowski 17:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable flash cartoon. Google search on term brings back only 21 unique on 314 returns. Wikipedia entry listed before creator's own website. No assertation of notability. Delete. MikeWazowski 17:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This stub for a non-notable private academy fails all tests of notability, including any version of WP:SCHOOL or WP:CORP. wikipediatrix 17:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN local radio personality. Prod removed after dispute on orignial nominators talk page. EnsRedShirt 17:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge into Missouri State University. Robdurbar 17:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if being the first and only e-Radio in the Ozarks established notability. The author disagrees, what do you others think? HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable filmmaker. Google search on name brings back only 185 unique on 3260, mostly blog, forum, and YouTube links. Filmmaker's project Alert does have a new IMDB page, but Gsearch on ("Jim Ether" Alert) brings back only 100 unique on 663 hits, none major or non-trivial. Delete. MikeWazowski 18:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article pertains to a film which is due for release (and this is imdb's best guess) in 2009. I have deleted the external links section of the article as it was totally irrelevant. The only source given is a couple of paragraphs on a page about many projects. The source doesn't support some of the assertions made about the content of the film. This seems to breach WP:V. At this stage I would question the project's notability and suggest the article is deleted until there is some verifiable information and it is at least out of development stage and in production Mallanox 18:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 23:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested. Does not seem to meet WP:PORNBIO. One user has tried to expand the entry into something more interesting but it still includes great stuff like "well known for her big round ass and her big natural tits". Pascal.Tesson 19:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This was a challenged speedy delete. It is completely non-notable and lacks context. Also, the sources could be questionable, but it also might me true. Anyway, this article should be deleted. Diez2 19:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 23:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non notable people google 872hits. Adbangse 19:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC) — Adbangse (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Essay, advert, non-notable Ronz 19:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result waskeep. JYolkowski // talk 23:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable "small private school", gets 384 unique Ghits. Article presents nothing that qualifies it under WP:SCHOOLS. wikipediatrix 19:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 23:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable "online school" with no sources cited for its specific claims of accreditation and notability, therefore failing all tests of notability. wikipediatrix 20:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Washington Online Learning Institue ("WOLI") is indeed accredited by the prestigious Middle States Association. This information may not appear on Middle States' website because the website has not yet been updated, and for no other reason. You may confirm the fact of accreditation by contacting Middle States Association. You may speak with the head of the organization, Hank Cram, who will confirm that WOLI is accredited by MSA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Koplen (talk • contribs) .
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Henry (Hank) G. Cram, Ed.D.
Dr. Cram was appointed Executive Director of the Middle States Commission on Secondary Schools (MSCSS) in July of 2005 following a long affiliation with MSA as a member of the Strategic Planning Advisory Committee, chair of both domestic and overseas evaluation teams, and representative for the Association at various conferences.
Dr. Cram has been involved in education for over 35 years. Prior to his appointment as Executive Director, Dr. Cram served as the Director of Staff Development for the New Jersey Association of School Administrators (NJASA). He has held a variety of teaching and administrative positions in New York and New Jersey including Superintendent of Schools for the Rancocas Valley Regional School District from 1988 to 2003. In addition, he has been a part-time lecturer at the Rutgers Graduate School of Education and an Instructor in the New Jersey Provisional Teacher Program at Rowan University.
Dr. Cram holds degrees from William Paterson University, Montclair State University, Fordham University and a doctorate in Educational Administration from Rutgers University. He has served as a consultant to school districts on a variety of topics and is the author of numerous works, including two books on change in public education and brain-based instructional practices.
Dr. Cram can be reached at hcram@css-msa.org or 215-662-5603 x5044 / Direct Dial: 267-284-5044 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.193.47.226 (talk • contribs) .
http://www.css-msa.org/search.php?MODE=VIEW(NY348): MSA has today updated its website and now shows WOLI as being a member. Please check the link.
The result was speedy delete A7 // PGK. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 21:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod (because it is not a "corp"). Prod text: "Non notable software, fails WP:CORP". EasyImage batch gets 148 distinct Google hits[54], mostly from sites with free downloads. Fram 20:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was CSD G7, creator blanked. - crz crztalk 00:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a hoax; the information here is completely unverifiable. I previously speedied it, but there is a weak assertion of notability here (despite the fact that it isn't verifiable), so I'm bringing it here. Coredesat 20:19, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dhartung does not know what they are talking about NPI and Larry Ormson did and arranged 100% of all the manufactoring of Trivial Pursuit they even impoted the dice from Tiawan, Larry Ormson built the first tooling when the game was to be called Triangel Pursuit. Without the organization and gamble of building the first molds with NO ORDERS the game would not been able to launch as fast and strong as it did. Selchow and Righter did not have a lot of money to invest in this game and did not imangine it would sell 20,000,000 the first 2 years. Fortune magazine 1984 has an article on Larry Ormson and Northern Plastics role in making Trivial Pursuit a sucess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddyhaskel (talk • contribs)
Larry Ormson did have Party in the Park for severl years and did much of the ground work Cornicia Press of New York to completely arrange and full fill manufactoring and orders.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.43.203 (talk • contribs)
Yes I agree selling Chitosan should be added, also the tax case is true and if someone wants to add it that is great, I served a 2 1/2 year sentence in Duluth MN Federal Prson and Florence CO, my inmate # is also available on BOP.GOV, I did only serve 16 months and all taxes have been cleared. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.43.203 (talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. I won't oppose to recreation with sourcing and avoiding copyright issues. Yanksox 02:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Found while patrolling for spam on #wikipedia-spam on the freenode network. Any opinions?] —— Eagle (ask me for help) 05:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is no confirmed information on this film, period. Bond 22 is the next scheduled film, and information for that article is scarce as it is- Just as there is no page for the United States presidential election, 2012, it is jumping the gun to start writing about Bond 23. -- Wikipedical 20:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as Daniel Craig is contracted for Bond 23, then it is a certain and worrents a page. 194.80.240.66 21:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not sure where to start with this one. It seems to be a list defined by very spotty and vague critera. The start of the article "Few of the following would qualify as neologisms from a strict lexicological perspective" - so why have neologism in the title? More than that, I see no way that it can claimed that anything but two or three of those are actually notable or used in the real world without engaging in original research. I'd also argue that it fails under WP:NOT as the vague wooly criteria means that it's pretty indiscrimate in what could be included Charlesknight 20:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Revise On the one hand, I think it's true that lots of the article is pointless - listing Frink's phrases or Burns' mis-words does no good to anyone. On the other hand, there are a few entries that should definitely be inclued in any tome on The Simpsons, such as Cromulent and D'Oh, which have a life beyond the show (and I think are real neologism?) So I would propose that the page stands but is radically revised to include only words which meet a chosen criteria, and I think "words or phrases which are used more than once" would be suitable, and would leave only the sorts of things that people are likely to want to look up --Mortice 22:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy close. Band is highly notable. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 21:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN band Frugalman 20:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Oh gawd. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self-proclaimed artist. Also doubt that the article was created by Dr. Dre himself. No references or externals. Lajbi Holla @ me 21:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by User:Youngamerican. // I c e d K o l a (Contribs) 04:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a 13-year-old with a single book published by a subsidy publisher--not notable at all ShelfSkewed [Talk] 21:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a subsidy-published novel by a 13-year old--not a notable book. ShelfSkewed [Talk] 21:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, although I'm not entirely sure I agree... Robdurbar 17:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not demonstrate notability of subject or provide documentation SteveHopson 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Because most of the documentation available is only on the net I decided to write an e-mail to the former publisher for information, which as far as I learned is a standard way of research. If needed I can produce these e-mails.
The question I have is if this is really about Kafenio, or, if Kafenio is removed, SteveHopson is right about the lack of notability of Roberta Beach Jacobson below.
Rough 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination; tagged with speedy for CSD:G1, patent nonsense, which it clearly isn't. Author posted that it is meant as serious article, and there are sources listed. Talk page lists notability and sourcing concerns. No recommendation. MCB 21:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Mindmatrix 16:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable soap opera character. In-universe style breaks Wikipedia style guide. Demiurge 21:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 00:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not assert or document notability of subject sufficient to meet test of WP:Bio SteveHopson 21:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. — CharlotteWebb 01:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am formally closing this debate. The consensus is "speedy keep". – Kaihsu 15:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 06:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion nomination Family tree/memorial article for encyclopedically non-notable Royal Navy Lieutenant Commander (equivalent to rank of Major in the Army) with WP:V problems also. DC (this is the UK navy award, no the US army award) honouree from WWII (over 5,000 (first time + bar (i.e. second, third or more time)) awarded in WWII[57]) and Korean War(can't find stats for this). Having trouble verifying career - no relevant non-wiki/wikimirror google hits [58][59] apart from family tree site of article creator, User:Kittybrewster; although DSCs are confirmed via the London Gazette[60]. Bwithh 21:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep, withdrawn nomination. Sorry. -Amarkov blahedits 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that state highways are automatically notable, and this one is definitely on the low end of notability. Amarkov blahedits 21:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - no socks please. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(While this is the second nom for an article under this title, it's the first nom for an article on this exact subject; the former article was only tangentially related to this one, apparently.) Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how a slip of the tongue by Bill O'Reilly during one interview segment two and a half years ago is somehow worthy of a Wikipedia article, unless you were just using it as an attack article, that is. Delete as total WP:N failure that exists only to disparage its subject. Aaron 21:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. Redirects are cheap and if someone has any objection to using them in place of these infobox+stub articles please say so on my talk page. RFerreira 23:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:SCHOOLS3. No assertion of notability. Nothing that can't be found on the school's webpage (less, AAMOF). Denni talk 21:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 23:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable reality show... guy ("Real World" isn't a game show so he's not a contestant). Danny Lilithborne 22:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by a vandal who is messing up the content of Line of succession to the Russian throne to suit his own views. Frankly put, this article is trash and all of the relevant information is covered in the proper article. Charles 22:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hardly a rant Charles. But, why do so many people have a problem with you? Tim Foxworth 16:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Don't worry about it Shilkanni- Charles has a problem with everyone who doesn't agree with him. He does know it all after all! Tim Foxworth 17:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I am not at all worrying about that. There is no such worry that Charles "knows it all" upon this matter. On the contrary. (He of course has strong opinions...) The worry is rather that he does not know enough to even recognize what is correct and what is not in this complex substance matter. After all, Charles himself wrote ten days ago: "I was wondering how much you know about the Line of succession to the Russian Throne... The article was basically a botch job of messy titles and names and loaded sentence structure. I've done a quick little fix up on it, but I do not know enough about the theoretical line of succession to verify its accuracy. If you know, would you be able to add anyone who is missing and correct the names if they are wrong? I tried to truncate the give names to what the individuals actually use but I am unfamiliar for the most part. Charles 00:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)" (copied from John Kenney's talk page, a person who knows at least something more than Charles) Shilkanni 22:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What I would really like to know is why Charles was allowed to do a "quick little fix up" without discussion, yet I was not. Only Charles is allowed to make edits without consulting anyone? Tim Foxworth 16:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
All of your conjecture is POV Charles. As far as pretenders using titles they are not entitled to- I see nothing wrong with using both, as long as it explained why and sources can be found for both usages- which I did. Nice try though. Tim Foxworth 16:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as blatant spam. cholmes75 (chit chat) 23:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed speedy. Non-notable skin product. Less than 30 ghits, no outside product reviews.Denni talk 22:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete (qualified under speedy A7 as well). Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article about NN web site that purports to allow visitors to communicate with an extraterrestrial who landed on Earth in 2003. About 130 ghits, mostly WP mirrors. Tubezone 22:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable infomercial personality - only 89 ghits for "Cathy Mitchell" infomercial (there are a bazillion other Cathy Mitchells in the world). Denni talk 22:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete -Obli (Talk)? 23:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be able to grow much farther. Yankee Rajput 22:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion nomination Gamecruft, listcruft, Wikipedia is not a video game guide as per WP:NOT. Main game article recently underwent a radical stubification to remove all game guide info as mandated by an afd. Bwithh 23:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as unverified. I cannot ascertain that the sole provided source is itself considered reliable, i.e. creates a citation trail, and no other sources have been offered. ~ trialsanderrors 06:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is a ((hoax)) tag on the article. I don't know if this is encyclopædic at all. I am thus nominating this article. It needs sources, etc. Hoax? Or truth? TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 23:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listed among apocryphal books attributed to Paul
In the 19th century Muslim anti-Biblical text The Great Debate, or Revealing the Truth (MSWord file) (HTML in Google cache):Some of these texts still exist. Whether or not this particular book ever actually existed, clearly the claim that it once did is not a recent one. Accordingly, the entry is not a hoax, and the tag for deletion should be withdrawn. (Copied over from Talk:Book of spells of serpents) – SAJordan talkcontribs 11:18, 21 Nov 2006 (UTC).The Books of Paul
The number of books ascribed to Paul, apart from those included in the New Testament, [emphasis added] is fifteen.
1. The Acts of Paul.
2. The Acts of Thecla.
3. The Epistle to the Laodiceans.
[...]
13. The Sermon of Paul.
14. The book of Spells of Serpents. [emphasis added]
15. The book of Acts of Peter and Paul.
Challenged material commented out.
Since the citations requested on 5 November 2006 have not been provided, I am commenting out the challenged portion of the topic article (rather than simply deleting it), so that it may more easily be restored in part or in whole if and when citations are found.
Since the "hoax" tag referred only to this material, it is included in the commented-out portion and no longer shows a hoax warning at page top.
Does this also resolve the deletion issue?
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 23:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not demonstrate notability of subject. SteveHopson 23:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep alive. Most educational journals are very dry reading OR are composed of teaching ideas. A centralized site for op eds in the field is rare on line.Bessielil 00:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Bessielil[reply]
The result was Delete Martinp23 21:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOFTWARE and WP:N failed by a mile. Once contained unsourced image. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 23:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Martinp23 21:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of meeting WP:CORP. Company name gets only one non-Wikipedia Google hit in English, only 1030 in Korean; none of those hits appears to be a reliable source, or indicates where any reliable sources might be found. Visviva 23:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Did not even need AfD - could have been speedied as a repost. -- RHaworth 08:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete nomination by User:Dumarest. Looks like a neologism and/or dicdef. --- RockMFR 23:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to List of commercial airlines in India. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Already better served by Category:Airlines of India. Prod tag removed. cholmes75 (chit chat) 23:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete.. Aksi_great (talk) 11:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced attribution of derogatory term - seems like an attack page Ronnotel 00:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because of this blog post, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |