January 2

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 2, 2020.

Template:Sco

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Placing an RfD tag on a redirect that points to a target that is likely to be deleted will just interfere with automatic deletion should the target be deleted. signed, Rosguill talk 01:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template redirect for a page in the process of being deleted. –MJLTalk 23:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Admistrative Posts of East Timor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary category redirect from a typo (left behind from when page moved but should have been deleted). No incoming links. Unlikely aid search. Senator2029 “Talk” 21:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Effects of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico (old)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redirect with the "(old)" qualifier is not needed. No substantive history. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Triproton

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, a cursory search at Google Scholar didn't seem to show any particular affinity between this term and lithium in particular (it seems that hydrogen and helium isotopes can also have three protons atoms can cluster in formations known as triproton, and most of the literature appears to focus on them). Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, they're not isotopes, but rather some sort of cluster of atoms that is referred to as a unit. signed, Rosguill talk 19:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I should also note that the reports of this isotope (system) are not definite, but the name is still in use and unambiguous. ComplexRational (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Narky Blert: I wrote a short section on this isotope in the isotopes of lithium article, so the redirect should then be retargeted to this section. ComplexRational (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BEAUZ (DJ)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No objections to deleting an apparently inappropriate redirect. ~ mazca talk 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BEAUZ was mentioned at the target in a "Notable alumni" section. However, they shouldn't be included there unless we have an article about them, so we should delete this redirect signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beauz

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No objections to deleting an apparently inappropriate redirect. ~ mazca talk 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be a nickname for the subject. Delete unless a justification is provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rudlof Hitler

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be an alternative name. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

∑∏Τ∑R SΗΦΚΔRΦ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zero pageviews for this redirect last year. Implausible redirect. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kostolac culture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kostolac and Vucedol Cultures are not the same, and as of now this page links to Vucedol. If I had the info I would just add Kostolac but I dont - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Kostolac culture should be a seperate thing. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 10:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

МHC Spartak

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first letter of this redirect has been replaced by a Cyrillic letter. Redirects like this are considered to be implausible as per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes#Mixed-script redirects. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

СGA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just like my previous nomination, this redirect also has its first letter from the Cyrillic Alphabet and is an implausible redirect so it should be deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

АUF

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term as first letter is from the Cyrillic alphabet and the number of pageviews are only five for January to November 2019. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

YASD

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not mentioned at the target page, making this redirect confusing for readers who don't already know what the term means. Not a very active user (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

YAAD

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 14#YAAD

Tiffany (South Korean singer)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 3#Tiffany (South Korean singer)

Nethack-el

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be the name of a non-notable NetHack variant which is not mentioned at the target page. Not a very active user (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of actual Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary precision makes this a very unlikely search term. (note, there seem to be no Fictional Parliamentary Secretaries of Canada) UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angel Munos

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unlikely misspelling of the founders name. (we already have Angel Munoz (CPL) redrecting here) UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disambiguation pages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except for O disambiguation, which does not target a disambiguation page. -- Tavix (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation pages (discussion)[edit]

Unlikely search terms for disambiguation pages due to non-standard titles, more unlikely search terms for those with targets that are not disambiguation pages. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#Foo disambiguation -> Foo and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 10#Tiers disambiguation. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally posted in Special:Diff/933642506, overwritten in edit conflict, comment was regarding only O_disambiguation --DannyS712 (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Anthony Appleyard: WP:R3 only applies to recently created redirects and there is an exception for page moves as well. Please be more careful in the future. -- Tavix (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Choccie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Evidence presented that this is an accepted spelling. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear why readers looking up this term would be and should be redirected to its target article. Third party engines seems to state that this word is an alternative spelling of some word "chocy", which in itself seems some sort of unclear slang word. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kuknalim

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. – Uanfala (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.