Photo 1. A Business Chess session in progress
Photo 1. A Business Chess session in progress

Business chess is a variant of chess played in teams. It was invented in 1992 by Dr. Grachya Ovakimyan of Moscow with the aim of making chess more entertaining and spectacular.[1][2][3]

In the opinion of the inventor, free and open discussion between team members and collective decision-making process may make the game spectacular by increasing its dynamism and presenting the various stages of chess players' thinking, evaluation of positions, calculation of variants, choice of alternatives, and so on.[4] In turn, in order to ensure active team discussion and effective decision-making process the Interactive Cognitive Scenario was developed.[5]

Ovakimyan describes this version of chess as a sports business game.[6][7]

Key ideas


Figure 1. Room setup
Figure 1. Room setup

The board, pieces, their positions and rules of movement are the same as for standard chess. But several parallel branches (versions of the same game) can be played at the same time on the several boards, with the help of rating (importance) indicators of a certain branch (red marks on top of the board, see Photo 2). The game is for two teams, recommended each to have five members. During the game members of one team may discuss it, as well as actively move, and then form the alternative (parallel) branches. They also can change the rating of each branch by transferring its marks. With the possibility of changing the number of simultaneously played branches and their ratings, qualitatively new, tactical and strategic methods of competition appear which are inherent only in this version of chess.[8]

In the Interactive Cognitive Scenario the following mechanisms are envisaged: (Photo 1 and Figure 1):

  1. Official moves in business chess are made on demonstration chessboards. Up to five such boards may be displayed side-by-side each with a branch arising during one game. Each demonstration board involved in a game has its rating (Photo 2). The basic mechanisms of the scenario – Branching, Selection and Passing of chess positions – are shown on the demonstration boards. These mechanisms affect the current and final score in a game and require members of both teams to coordinate their actions and carry out their decisions.
  2. To discuss positions and calculate variants, each of the teams is provided with five ordinary chessboards with full sets of pieces.
  3. To limit the time of a game there is only one chess clock, however many branches are played in parallel. It is started after the team makes a move in all branches.[9] The time of each team is limited to one hour. If one branch remains in the endgame, an additional five minutes is given.

Interactive Cognitive Scenario

Photo 2. Branches. The red colored chips at the top of each display board indicate the rating of each branch.
Photo 2. Branches. The red colored chips at the top of each display board indicate the rating of each branch.

Demonstration boards

Parallel variants of a game (branches) can be played on five nearby demonstration boards, numbered 1 to 5, each of which has its own rating (See Photo 2). Teams can decide to change the number of branches and their ratings. The score of each branch (on a particular board) is equal to its chess result, multiplied by the rating of the given branch. The final score of the game is equal to the sum of results of all branches.

The game begins on one demonstration board only, representing branch 1 (see Figure 1) with rating 10. Branching is used (see Figure 2) to increase the number of branches.

Figure 2. Branching
Figure 2. Branching

To carry out a Branching the team on its move copies the position from board 1 to a free demonstration board, apply differing continuations (for example, on a demonstration board 1 move e4, and on a board 2 – g3). In this case, the rating of the original (maternal) branch is distributed between the child branches according to the decision made by the team making the branch.[10] As a result of the subsequent branching there will appear branches 3, 4, and 5.[11]

If in the course of a game one of the teams gets a branch with a lost position (e.g. branch 1 in Figure 3), then the team may resign the game in that branch and transfer all the chips of its rating to the demonstration board of another (parallel) branch, where the team has an undefeated position (e.g. branch 2). This represents the so-called Selection, which offers a team a possibility of winning back what has been lost.

Figure 3. Selection.
Figure 3. Selection.

As a result of such a redistribution, the rating of the lost branch is added to the rating of the remaining one and the opponent gets points equal to the lost branch rating (in the given case, three points).

A Business chess game tree structure resulting from operations of Branching and Selection is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. A business chess game tree without chess passing. The rectangles denote branches (1 to 5) and their respective ratings (1 to 10)
Figure 4. A business chess game tree without chess passing. The rectangles denote branches (1 to 5) and their respective ratings (1 to 10)

On Figure 4 the increasing number of branches is shown (after move 7, there are already two branches, after move 11, three, after the move 12, four, and after move 18, five branches). Then, as a result of the selection and drawing (on moves 24, 25, 29 and 37, respectively) the number of branches gradually decreases. After move 37 and until the end of the game there remains only one branch, with a rating of eight.

A very important tactical element of the business chess scenario is chess Passing. Such a pass enables one to transfer, in a single move, one unit of rating from one branch to another without loss of points.[12] It is a way of adjusting branch ratings as the team reassesses their positions. The game tree with Passing has a more complicated form (see Figure 5).

Figure 5. A business chess game tree with chess passing. The rectangles denote branches (1 to 5) and their respective ratings (1 to 10)
Figure 5. A business chess game tree with chess passing. The rectangles denote branches (1 to 5) and their respective ratings (1 to 10)

Only one member of the team may move pieces and ratings on the demonstration board after the team decides collectively. This stops players crowding in front of the demonstration boards. For this purpose the zone before the rows of demonstration boards is separated from the zone of team location by red lines which only one team member may cross.


Photo 3. The Black team discussing one of the branches. In the background can be seen the White team in discussion.
Photo 3. The Black team discussing one of the branches. In the background can be seen the White team in discussion.

Each team is provided five ordinary chess boards to freely discuss positions and calculate variants (Figure 1). At each board the team (or part of it) discusses the position arising in one of the branches of a game (Photo 3 and Video[13][14][15]). The team itself determines how it organizes discussions and makes decisions. Interactive Cognitive Scenario only suggests the possibility of alternative actions of each team member (using branching) in combination with the possibility of subsequent rejection from them when it becomes clear for team that these actions were erroneous (using selection).

Game parameters

There is a huge number of possible ways the Interactive Cognitive Scenario can be realized. Therefore, before a game is played some parameters should be agreed:


Focus on chess

During the game, spectators are able to hear and see team discussions: what information and in what scope the players analyze, how much and what options are offered for continuation, at what depth they are calculated, how the evaluations of positions changes during the passing and what final decisions are taken as a result. For the first time this becomes available for spectators' assessment directly, rather than via expert analysis.

The demonstration boards show several competing versions of the game (branches). Their number and ratings change throughout the game and directly affect the current and final score of the game.

Focus on people

Business chess creates a team spirit and socio-psychological atmosphere that is not specific to chess. It may be of interest even for spectators who do not care much for chess.

Playing business chess brings out familiar social problems for the teams such as leadership and psychological compatibility, a division of labor and specialization, choosing effective ways of management (authoritarian, democratic, etc.) and problem solving, generating new ideas, their discussion, implementation and development in a competitive environment, and so on.

Spectators can also watch almost all varieties of situations typical in group competition, and their continuous change, depending on the availability or shortage of advantages, time, alternative ways of development, and so on.


Tournaments have been held regularly since 1997.[16][17] Running commentary of one of them was broadcast on Armenian national television.[18]

In Moscow Russian leading grandmasters participated in two representative tournaments. The first was held in the Central House of Chess by M. M. Botvinnik in 2004,[19] the proceedings of which were broadcast by the Sports channel of Russian TV.[20] The second was held in the Moscow Chess Club by T. V. Petrosian in 2005.[21]

Wider aspects

Apart from being a sport, Business Chess can also be used for scientific modelling of mental activity,[22] the processes of problem solving and a choice of strategy,[23] as a general educational business game,[24] method of psychological evaluation, psychological training and play therapy.[5] Such opportunity is conditioned by team active discussion and a multistage process of group decision-making based on sociocultural evolution depending on changing conditions (game). It can be seen that the main mechanisms of Interactive Cognitive Scenario (branching and selection) resemble biological mechanisms of evolution (genetic mutation and natural selection).

Scientific model

Business chess as a scientific model can be effectively used for researches in following areas: game theory, bifurcation theory, information theory, control theory and decision theory, the theory of innovation diffusion, management science, sociocultural evolution, cognitive psychology and social psychology, research into natural intelligence and artificial intelligence, and so on. Thus as an expert system the application of existing chess computer programs is possible.

In school

Experts in the field of child psychology agree that the system of national school education must first socialize pupils, that is, accustom and adapt them for the life in social structures.[25] With this purpose it is reasonable to use Business Chess as a general educational business game. The primary goal of similar lessons is to carry out intellectual and socially-psychological trainings for the pupils to make them skilled in constructive communication, communicative competence, efficient management, social self-organization, psychological strength and adaptation in group. It is supposed,[24] that it promotes effective socialization and harmonious development of cogitative (cognitive), behavioral (interactive) and emotional (motivational) components of pupils' personality studying at comprehensive schools.

It is also reasonable to use Business Chess for carrying out psychological evaluation at schools. The opportunity to register a lot of individual and group psychological parameters at the same time so as to observe their changes in dynamics, allows a complex estimation of intelligence, aptitude, level of achievement, personal situational correlations and mental development. Available expert systems in the form of modern chess computer programs enhance reliability of such researches.

A section of the "Business Chess" book is devoted to this subject,[5] and also a lot of popular articles are included in the collection entitled "Sports business games: Business Chess, Go, Renju and others", 2007.[26][27]


  1. ^ Ovakimyan, Grachya (1997). "Интеллектуальные игры по новой системе. Как сделать зрелищной внутреннюю логику борьбы. ("Intellectual games on new system. How to make internal logic of fight spectacular")". 64 (chess magazine) (in Russian) (7): 41–43.
  2. ^ "Business chess rules". Chess Academy of Armenia. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
  3. ^ Ovakimyan, G. K. (2017). Зрелищные шахматы и другие интеллектуальные спортивные игры [SPECTACULAR CHESS and other intellectual sports games] (in Russian). Moscow: «Русский Шахматный Дом» ("«RUSSIAN CHESS HOUSE»"). ISBN 978-5-94693-665-1.
  4. ^ Ovakimyan, Grachya (2016). Зрелищные шахматы: где, что, кого и как показывать. (“Spectacular chess: where, what, who and how to show it”).
  5. ^ a b c Ovakimyan, G. K. (2001). Деловые шахматы: зрелищный сценарий шахматной игры, голографическая модель психической деятельности, специальная и общеобразовательная деловая игра, модель принятия решения и выбора стратегии, метод психодиагностики и психотренинга [Business chess: the spectacular scenario of chess, the holographic model of mental activity, special and general educational business game, model of decision-making and a choice of strategy, a method of psychological diagnostics and psychological training] (in Russian). Moscow: Voenizdat. ISBN 5-86490-071-2.
  6. ^ "Sports Business Games and the Third Revolution in Sports". Business chess. Retrieved 21 July 2010.
  7. ^ Ovakimyan, Grachya (2019). The Third Revolution in Sports. Moscow: Russian CHESS House. ISBN 978-5-94693-887-7.
  8. ^ "On Business Chess, Economy, Politics, and School Education". Business chess. Retrieved 21 July 2010.
  9. ^ "a video clip of Business Chess".
  10. ^ "video about branching".
  11. ^ "video about branches". Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  12. ^ "video of chess Passing". Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  13. ^ "White". Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  14. ^ "Black". Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  15. ^ "One move in Business Chess : Black and White". Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  16. ^ Barskij, Vladimir (1997). Фестиваль ждет хозяина. Каникулы начинаются в Москве. [The festival waits for the owner. The vacations begin in Moscow]. 64 (chess magazine) (in Russian). No. 6. pp. 40–41.
  17. ^ Chernysheva, Marina (2002). Во что сыграли? КВН и чуть-чуть психологии. [What game have we played? KVN and slightly psychology]. 64 (chess magazine) - Junior (in Russian). No. 8. pp. 48–49. Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2010-07-08.
  18. ^ "Running commentary on the 1-st business chess Championship of Yerevan". June 2003. Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  19. ^ Sambuev, Bator (2004). Деловые шахматы. В густых ветвях вариантов. [Business chess. In thick branches of variants]. Shahmatnaja Nedelja [Chess week] (in Russian) (15): 6.
  20. ^ "Running commentary of News-Sport on the TV channel "Sports" from the Central Chess House after M. M. Botvinik about the demonstration of business chess". 2004. Archived from the original on 2021-12-15.
  21. ^ Panejah, Andrej; Devjatkin, Andrej (2005). Деловые шахматы. Увлекательный сюжет в двух сериях. [Business chess. A fascinating story in two episodes]. Shahmatnaja Nedelja [Chess week] (in Russian) (22): 8–9.
  22. ^ Ovakimyan, G. K. (2000). "Шахматы по Интерактивному когнитивному сценарию — динамическая голографическая модель психической деятельности" [Chess on the Interactive cognitive scenario - the dynamic holographic model of the mental activity]. Mir Psihologii ("The World of Psychology") (in Russian) (4): 107–120.
  23. ^ Ovakimyan, G. K. (2001). "Проблемы принятия группового решения и выбора стратегии (Шахматы по Интерактивному когнитивному сценарию). ("The problem of a group decision-making and of a strategy choice (the Chess on the Interactive cognitive scenario.)")". Mir Psihologii ("The World of Psychology") (in Russian) (3): 270–274.
  24. ^ a b Ovakimyan, G. K. (2002). "Общеобразовательная ситуационно-ролевая игра в развитии конструктивного общения и групповых норм поведения растущего человека" [General educational situational-role game in the development of a constructive dialogue and group norms of behavior of a growing person]. Mir Psihologii ("The World of Psychology") (in Russian) (2): 178–188.
  25. ^ Kavtaradze, D. N. (2009). Обучение и игра: введение в интерактивные методы обучения. [Training and game: introduction in interactive methods of training] (in Russian). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Prosveshhenie». ISBN 978-5-09-019851-6.
  26. ^ Ovakimyan, G. K. (2007). Спортивные деловые игры: деловые шахматы, го, рэндзю и другие. Сборник избранных статей [Sports business games: Business Chess, Go, Renju and others. Collection of selected articles] (in Russian). Moscow: Filial FGUP «Voennoe izdatel'stvo» MO RF (imprint of the "Military Publishing house", Department of Defense of the Russian Federation). ISBN 5-203-02737-7.
  27. ^ ""Business Chess" on the site of the Chess Federation of Moscow".