The clearance space between a train and the tunnel is often small. Pictured is a London Underground Northern line train at Hendon Central.

A loading gauge is a diagram or physical structure that defines the maximum height and width dimensions in railway vehicles and their loads. Their purpose is to ensure that rail vehicles can pass safely through tunnels and under bridges, and keep clear of platforms, trackside buildings and structures.[1] Classification systems vary between different countries, and gauges may vary across a network, even if the track gauge is uniform.

The term loading gauge can also be applied to the maximum size of road vehicles in relation to tunnels, overpasses and bridges, and doors into automobile repair shops, bus garages, filling stations, residential garages, multi-storey car parks and warehouses.

A related but separate gauge is the structure gauge, which sets limits to the extent that bridges, tunnels and other infrastructure can encroach on rail vehicles. The difference between these two gauges is called the clearance. The specified amount of clearance makes allowance for wobbling of rail vehicles at speed.


The London Underground utilises differing loading gauges: a Metropolitan line A Stock sub-surface train (left) passes a Piccadilly line 1973 Stock tube train (right).

The loading gauge restricts the size of passenger coaches, goods wagons (freight cars) and shipping containers that can travel on a section of railway track. It varies across the world and often within a single railway system. Over time there has been a trend towards larger loading gauges and more standardization of gauges; some older lines have had their structure gauges enhanced by raising bridges, increasing the height and width of tunnels and making other necessary alterations. Containerisation and a trend towards larger shipping containers has led rail companies to increase structure gauges to compete effectively with road haulage.

The term "loading gauge" can also refer to a physical structure, sometimes using electronic detectors using light beams on an arm or gantry placed over the exit lines of goods yards or at the entry point to a restricted part of a network. The devices ensure that loads stacked on open or flat wagons stay within the height/shape limits of the line's bridges and tunnels, and prevent out-of-gauge rolling stock entering a stretch of line with a smaller loading gauge. Compliance with a loading gauge can be checked with a clearance car. In the past, these were simple wooden frames or physical feelers mounted on rolling stock. More recently, laser beams are used.

The loading gauge is the maximum size of rolling stock. It is distinct from the minimum structure gauge, which sets limits to the size of bridges and tunnels on the line, allowing for engineering tolerances and the motion of rail vehicles. The difference between the two is called the clearance. The terms "dynamic envelope" or "kinematic envelope" – which include factors such as suspension travel, overhang on curves (at both ends and middle) and lateral motion on the track – are sometimes used in place of loading gauge.[citation needed]

The railway platform height is also a consideration for the loading gauge of passenger trains. Where the two are not directly compatible, stairs may be required, which will increase loading times. Where long carriages are used at a curved platform, there will be gaps between the platform and the carriage door, causing risk. Problems increase where trains of several different loading gauges and train floor heights use (or even must pass without stopping at) the same platform.

The size of load that can be carried on a railway of a particular gauge is also influenced by the design of the rolling stock. Low-deck rolling stock can sometimes be used to carry taller 9 ft 6 in (2.9 m) shipping containers on lower gauge lines although their low-deck rolling stock cannot then carry as many containers.

Rapid transit (metro) railways generally have a very small loading gauge, which reduces the cost of tunnel construction. These systems only use their own specialised rolling stock.

Out of gauge

Larger out-of-gauge loads can also sometimes be conveyed by taking one or more of the following measures:


The loading gauge on the main lines of Great Britain, most of which were built before 1900, is generally smaller than in other countries. In mainland Europe, the slightly larger Berne gauge (Gabarit passe-partout international, PPI) was agreed to in 1913 and came into force in 1914.[2][3] As a result, British trains have noticeably and considerably smaller loading gauges and, for passenger trains, smaller interiors, despite the track being standard gauge, which is in line with much of the world.

This often results in increased costs for purchasing new trainsets or locomotives as they must be specifically designed for the existing British network, rather than being purchased "off-the-shelf". For example, the new trains for HS2 have a 50% premium applied to the "classic compatible" sets that will be "compatible" with the current (or "classic") rail network loading gauge as well as the HS2 line. The "classic compatible" trainsets will cost £40 million per trainset whereas the HS2-only stock (built to European loading gauge and only suitable to operate on HS2 lines) will cost £27M per trainset despite the HS2-only stock being physically larger.[4]

It was recognized even during the nineteenth century that this would pose problems and countries whose railroads had been built or upgraded to a more generous loading gauge pressed for neighboring countries to upgrade their own standards. This was particularly true in continental Europe where the Nordic countries and Germany with their relatively generous loading gauge wanted their cars and locomotives to be able to run throughout the standard gauge network without being limited to a small size. France, which at the time had the most restrictive loading gauge ultimately compromised giving rise to Berne gauge which came into effect just before World War I.

Military railways were often built to particularly high standards, especially after the American Civil War and the Franco-Prussian War showed the importance of railroads in military deployment as well as mobilization. The Kaiserreich was particularly active in the construction of military railways which were often built with great expense to be as flat, straight and permissive in loading gauge as possible while bypassing major urban areas, making those lines of little use to civilian traffic, particularly civilian passenger traffic. However, all those aforementioned factors have in some cases led to the subsequent abandoning of those railroads.

Standard loading gauges for standard track gauge lines

International Union of Railways (UIC) Gauge

UIC loading gauges

The International Union of Railways (UIC) has developed a standard series of loading gauges named A, B, B+ and C.


European standards

Railway clearance G1 and G2 (Germany)

In the European Union, the UIC directives were supplanted by ERA Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI) of European Union in 2002, which has defined a number of recommendations to harmonize the train systems. The TSI Rolling Stock (2002/735/EC) has taken over the UIC Gauges definitions defining Kinematic Gauges with a reference profile such that Gauges GA and GB have a height of 4.35 m (14 ft 3 in) (they differ in shape) with Gauge GC rising to 4.70 m (15 ft 5 in) allowing for a width of 3.08 m (10 ft 1 in) of the flat roof.[7] All cars must fall within an envelope of 3.15 m (10 ft 4 in) wide on a 250 m (12.4 ch; 820 ft) radius curve. The TGVs, which are 2.9 m (9 ft 6 in) wide, fall within this limit.

The designation of a GB+ loading gauge refers to the plan to create a pan-European freight network for ISO containers and trailers with loaded ISO containers. These container trains (piggy-back trains) fit into the B envelope with a flat top so that only minor changes are required for the widespread structures built to loading gauge B on continental Europe. A few structures on the British Isles were extended to fit with GB+ as well, where the first lines to be rebuilt start at the Channel Tunnel.[8]

Owing to their historical legacies, many member states' railways do not conform to the TSI specification. For example, Britain's role at the forefront of railway development in the 19th century has condemned it to the small infrastructure dimensions of that era. Conversely, the loading gauges of countries that were satellites of the former Soviet Union are much larger than the TSI specification. Other than for GB+, they are not likely to be retrofitted, given the enormous cost and disruption that would be entailed.[citation needed]

Loading gauge Static reference profile Kinematic reference profile Comments
UIC and/or TSI[9][10] RIV[11] Width Height Width Height
G1 / UIC 505-1 T 11 3.150 m 4.280 m 3.290 m 4.310 m Static profile also known as Berne gauge, PPI or OSJD 03-WM.
GA T 12 4.320 m 4.350 m
GB T 13
GB1 / GB+[12]
G2 T 14 4.650 m 4.680 m Formerly UIC C; Static profile also known as OSJD 02-WM.
DE3 not defined Expansion for G2, part of TEN-T regulations.
GC 3.150 m 4.650 m 4.700 m Formerly UIC C1.
C 3.600 m 4.830 m not defined High-capacity rail corridor standard for Øresund Bridge and Fehmarn Belt Tunnel[13]

Double-decker carriages

Zürich – Lucerne IC 2000 double-decker Intercity train
Double-decker carriage as used on French TGV railways

A specific example of the value of these loading gauges is that they permit double decker passenger carriages. Although mainly used for suburban commuter lines, France is notable for using them on its high speed TGV services: the SNCF TGV Duplex carriages are 4,303 millimetres (14 ft 1+38 in) high,[14] the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland feature large numbers of double decker intercity trains as well.

Great Britain

Great Britain has (in general) the most restrictive loading gauge (relative to track gauge) in the world. That is a legacy of the British railway network being the world's oldest, and of having been built by a plethora of different private companies, each with different standards for the width and height of trains. After nationalisation, a standard static gauge W5 was defined in 1951 that would virtually fit everywhere in the network. The W6 gauge is a refinement of W5, and the W6a changed the lower body to accommodate third-rail electrification. While the upper body is rounded for W6a with a static curve, there is an additional small rectangular notch for W7 to accommodate the transport of 2.44 m (8 ft 0 in) ISO containers, and the W8 loading gauge has an even larger notch spanning outside of the curve to accommodate the transport of 2.6 m (8 ft 6 in) ISO containers. While W5 to W9 are based on a rounded roof structure, those for W10 to W12 define a flat line at the top and, instead of a strict static gauge for the wagons, their sizes are derived from dynamic gauge computations for rectangular freight containers.[15]

Network Rail uses a W loading gauge classification system of freight transport ranging from W6A (smallest) through W7, W8, W9, W9Plus, W10, W11 to W12 (largest). The definitions assume a common "lower sector structure gauge" with a common freight platform at 1,100 mm (43.31 in) above rail.[16]

In addition, gauge C1 provides a specification for standard coach stock, gauge C3 for longer Mark 3 coaching stock, gauge C4 for Pendolino stock[17] and gauge UK1 for high-speed rail. There is also a gauge for locomotives. The size of container that can be conveyed depends both upon the size of the load that can be conveyed and the design of the rolling stock.[18]

A strategy was adopted in 2004 to guide enhancements of loading gauges[27] and in 2007 the freight route utilisation strategy was published. That identified a number of key routes where the loading gauge should be cleared to W10 standard and, where structures are being renewed, that W12 is the preferred standard.[25]

Height and width of containers that can be carried on GB gauges (height by width). Units as per source material.

Tube lines

A Parliamentary committee headed by James Stansfeld then reported on 23 May 1892, "The evidence submitted to the Committee on the question of the diameter of the underground tubes containing the railways has been distinctly in favour of a minimum diameter of 11 ft 6 in (3.51 m)". After that, all tube lines were at least that size.[28]


Sweden uses shapes similar to the Central European loading gauge, but trains are allowed to be much wider.

There are three main classes in use (width × height):[29]

The Iron Ore Line north of Kiruna was the first electrified railway line in Sweden and has limited height clearance (SE-B) because of snow shelters. On the rest of the network belonging to the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket), the structure gauge accepts cars built to SE-A and thus accepts both cars built to UIC GA and GB. Some modern electric multiple units, like Regina X50 with derivatives, are somewhat wider than normally permitted by SE-A at 3.45 m (11 ft 4 in). This is generally acceptable as the extra width is above normal platform height, but it means that they can not use the high platforms that Arlanda Express uses (Arlanda Central Station has normal clearances). The greater width allows sleeping cars in which tall people can sleep with straight legs and feet, which is not the case on the continent.


In the Netherlands, a similar shape to the UIC C is used that rises to 4.70 m (15 ft 5 in) in height. The trains are wider allowing for 3.40 m (11 ft 2 in) width similar to Sweden. About one third of the Dutch passenger trains use bilevel rail cars. However, Dutch platforms are much higher than Swedish ones.


Channel Tunnel

North America


Further information: Boxcar § Loading gauges

Further information: Double-stack rail transport § Sizes and clearances

The American loading gauge for freight cars on the North American rail network is generally based on standards set by the Association of American Railroads (AAR) Mechanical Division.[30] The most widespread standards are AAR Plate B and AAR Plate C,[31] but higher loading gauges have been introduced on major routes outside urban centers to accommodate rolling stock that makes better economic use of the network, such as auto carriers, hi-cube boxcars, and double-stack container loads.[32] The maximum width of 10 ft 8 in (3.25 m) on 41 ft 3 in (12.57 m) and 46 ft 3 in (14.10 m) truck centers is valid on a 441 ft 8+38 in (134.63 m) radius or 13° curve.[30][31]

Listed here are the maximum heights and widths for cars. However, the specification in each AAR plate shows a car cross section that is chamfered at the top and bottom, meaning that a compliant car is not permitted to fill an entire rectangle of the maximum height and width.[31]

Width Height Truck centers Comments Image
ft in m ft in m ft in m
B 10  8  3.25 15  1  4.60 41  3  12.57 For longer truck centers, the width is decreased according to graph AAR Plate B-1 on a 441 ft 8+38 in (134.63 m) radius curve[30] or AAR Plate D-1[31]
C 10  8  3.25 15  6  4.72 46  3  14.10 For longer truck centers, the width is decreased according to graph AAR Plate C-1 on a 441 ft 8+38 in (134.63 m) radius curve[30] or AAR Plate D-1[31]
E 10  8  3.25 15  9  4.80 46  3  14.10 However the top of rail clearance is 2+34 in (70 mm) instead of 2+12 in (64 mm).[31][33]
F 10  8  3.25 17  0  5.18 46  3  14.10 As with AAR Plate C but 18 in (457 mm) taller than AAR Plate C and 15 in (381 mm) taller than AAR Plate E, and the car cross section is larger at the top than AAR Plate E.[31]
H 10  8  3.25[34] 20  3  6.17 62  7  19.08[34] e.g. double stacked containers in well cars. The cross section at the bottom of the well car differs from the X section of all other AAR plates. X section at center of car[31][35][34]
H 10  1  3.07[31] 20  3  6.17 63  9  19.43 e.g. double stacked containers at greater than 63 ft 9 in (19.43 m) truck centers
The cross section at the bottom of the well car differs from all other AAR Plates.[31][36] in well cars[34]
--- 10+14  3.00[34] 3  11  1.19[34] 66  0  20.12[34] e.g. 85-foot-2+12-inch (25.97 m)[34] long flatcars, *Height of deck at center of car[34] Width covered by AAR Plate D-1.[31]
J 10  8  3.25 19  0  5.79 55  0  16.76 Truck centers can be more. Widths covered by AAR Plate D-1.[31]
K 10  0  3.05 20  3  6.17[31] 65  0  19.81 e.g. Autorack (road vehicles on trains). Width at center of car covered by AAR Plate D-1[31][34][37]
L 10  8  3.25 16  3  4.95 46  3  14.10 For locomotives only[31]
M 10  8  3.25 16  3  4.95 46  3  14.10 For locomotives only [31]

Technically, AAR Plate B is still the maximum height and truck center combination[30][31] and the circulation of AAR Plate C is somewhat restricted. The prevalence of excess-height rolling stock, at first ~18 ft (5.49 m) piggybacks and hicube boxcars, then later autoracks, airplane-parts cars, and flatcars for hauling Boeing 737 fuselages, as well as 20 ft 3 in (6.17 m) high double-stacked containers in container well cars, has been increasing. This means that most, if not all, lines are now designed for a higher loading gauge. The width of these extra-height cars is covered by AAR Plate D-1.[30][31]

All the Class I rail companies have invested in longterm projects to increase clearances to allow double stack freight. The mainline North American rail networks of the Union Pacific, the BNSF, the Canadian National, and the Canadian Pacific, have already been upgraded to AAR Plate K. This represents over 60% of the Class I rail network.[38]


Passenger service

Standard AAR passenger loading gauge (does not accommodate Amtrak "Superliners" nor ex-AT&SF "Hi-Level" cars)

The old standard North American passenger railcar is 10 ft 6 in (3.20 m) wide by 14 ft 6 in (4.42 m) high and measures 85 ft 0 in (25.91 m) over coupler pulling faces with 59 ft 6 in (18.14 m) truck centers, or 86 ft 0 in (26.21 m) over coupler pulling faces with 60 ft 0 in (18.29 m) truck centers. In the 1940s and 1950s, the American passenger car loading gauge was increased to a 16 ft 6 in (5.03 m) height throughout most of the country outside the Northeast, to accommodate dome cars and later Superliners and other bilevel commuter trains. Bilevel and Hi-level passenger cars have been in use since the 1950s, and new passenger equipment with a height of 19 ft 9+12 in (6.03 m) has been built for use in Alaska and the Canadian Rockies. The structure gauge of the Mount Royal Tunnel used to limit the height of bilevel cars to 14 feet 6 inches (4.42 m) before it was permanently closed to interchange rail traffic prior to its conversion for the REM rapid transit system.[citation needed]

New York City Subway

The New York City Subway is an amalgamation of three former constituent companies, and while all are standard gauge, inconsistencies in loading gauge prevent cars from the former BMT and IND systems (B Division) from running on the lines of the former IRT system (A Division), and vice versa. This is mainly because IRT tunnels and stations are approximately 1 foot (305 mm) narrower than the others, meaning that IRT cars running on the BMT or IND lines would have platform gaps of over 8 inches (203 mm) between the train and some platforms, whereas BMT and IND cars would not even fit into an IRT station without hitting the platform edge. Taking this into account, all maintenance vehicles are built to IRT loading gauge so that they can be operated over the entire network, and employees are responsible for minding the gap.

Another inconsistency is the maximum permissible railcar length. Cars in the former IRT system are 51 feet (15.54 m) as of December 2013. Railcars in the former BMT and IND can be longer: on the former Eastern Division, the cars are limited to 60 feet (18.29 m), while on the rest of the BMT and IND lines plus the Staten Island Railway (which uses modified IND stock) the cars may be as long as 75 feet (22.86 m).[39][40]

Boston (MBTA)

The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's (MBTA) rapid transit system is composed of four unique subway lines; while all lines are standard gauge, inconsistencies in loading gauge, electrification, and platform height prevent trains on one line from being used on another. The first segment of the Green Line (known as the Tremont Street subway) was constructed in 1897 to take the streetcars off Boston's busy downtown streets. When the Blue Line opened in 1904, it only ran streetcar services; the line was converted to rapid transit in 1924 due to high passenger loads, but the tight clearances in the tunnel under the Boston Harbor required narrower and shorter rapid transit cars.[41] The Orange Line was originally built in 1901 to accommodate heavy rail transit cars of higher capacity than streetcars. The Red Line was opened in 1912, designed to handle what were for a time the largest underground transit cars in the world.[42]: 127 

Los Angeles (LACMTA)

The Los Angeles Metro Rail system is an amalgamation of two former constituent companies, the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission and the Southern California Rapid Transit District; both of those companies were responsible for planning the initial system. It is composed of two heavy rail subway lines and several light rail lines with subway sections; while all lines are standard gauge, inconsistencies in electrification and loading gauge prohibit the light rail trains from operating on the heavy rail lines, and vice versa. The LACTC-planned Blue Line was opened in 1990 and partially operates on the route of the Pacific Electric interurban railroad line between downtown Los Angeles and Long Beach, which used overhead electrification and street-running streetcar vehicles. The SCRTD-planned Red Line (later split into the Red and Purple lines) was opened in 1993 and was designed to handle high-capacity heavy rail transit cars that would operate underground. Shortly after the Red Line began operations, the LACTC and the SCRTD merged to form the LACMTA, which became responsible for planning and construction of the Green, Gold, Expo, and K lines, as well as the D Line Extension and the Regional Connector.


Major trunk raillines in East Asian countries, including China, North Korea, South Korea, as well as the Shinkansen of Japan, have all adopted a loading gauge of 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in) maximum width and can accept the maximum height of 4,500 mm (14 ft 9 in).[43]


The maximum height, width, and length of general Chinese rolling stock are 4,800 mm (15 ft 9 in), 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in) and 26 m (85 ft 4 in) respectively, with an extra out-of-gauge load allowance of height and width 5,300 by 4,450 mm (17 ft 5 in by 14 ft 7 in) with some special shape limitation, corresponding to a structure gauge of 5,500 by 4,880 mm (18 ft 1 in by 16 ft 0 in).[44] China is building numerous new railways in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia (such as in Kenya and Laos), and these are being built to "Chinese Standards". This presumably means track gauge, loading gauge, structure gauge, couplings, brakes, electrification, etc.[45][circular reference] An exception may be double stacking, which has a height limit of 5,850 mm (19 ft 2 in). Metre gauge in China has a gauge of 3,050 mm (10 ft 0 in).

Japan, standard gauge

Translation of legend:

Trains on the Shinkansen network operate on 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) standard gauge track and have a loading gauge of 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in) maximum width and 4,500 mm (14 ft 9 in) maximum height.[46] This allows the operation of double-deck high-speed trains.

Mini Shinkansen (former conventional 1,067 mm or 3 ft 6 in narrow gauge lines that have been regauged into 1,435 mm or 4 ft 8+12 in standard gauge) and some private railways in Japan (including some lines of the Tokyo subway and all of the Osaka Metro) also use standard gauge; however, their loading gauges are different.

The rest of Japan's system is discussed under narrow gauge, below.

Hong Kong

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (April 2019)

South Korea

The body frame may have a maximum height of 4,500 mm (14 ft 9 in) and a maximum width of 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in) with additional installations allowed up to 3,600 mm (11 ft 10 in). That width of 3,400 mm is only allowed above 1,250 mm (4 ft 1 in) as the common passenger platforms are built to former standard trains of 3,200 mm (10 ft 6 in) in width.


There is currently no uniform standard for loading gauges in the country and both loading gauges and platform heights vary by rail line.

The North–South Commuter Railway allows passenger trains with a carbody width of 3,100 mm (10 ft 2 in) and a height of 4,300 mm (14 ft 1 in). Additional installations shall also be allowed up to 3,300 mm (10 ft 10 in) at a platform height of 1,100 mm (3 ft 7 in) where it is limited by half-height platform screen doors. Above the platform gate height of 1,200 mm (3 ft 11 in) above the platforms, out-of-gauge installations can be further maximized to the Asian standard at 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in).[47]

Meanwhile, the PNR South Long Haul will follow the Chinese gauge and therefore use a larger carbody width of 3,300 mm (10 ft 10 in) from the specifications of passenger rolling stock, and a height of 4,770 mm (15 ft 8 in) per P70-type boxcar specifications.[47]


Some of the new railways being built in Africa allow for double-stacked containers, the height of which is about 5,800 mm (19 ft 0 in) depending on the height of each container 2,438 mm (8 ft 0 in) or 2,900 mm (9 ft 6 in) plus the height of the deck of the flat wagon about 1,000 mm (3 ft 3 in) totalling 5,800 mm (19 ft 0 in). This exceeds the China height standard for single stacked containers of 4,800 mm (15 ft 9 in). Additional height of about 900 mm (2 ft 11 in) is needed for overhead wires for 25 kV AC electrification.

The permissible width of the new African standard gauge railways is 3,400 mm (11 ft 2 in).


The standard gauge lines of New South Wales Government Railways (NSWGR) allowed for a width of 9 ft 6 in (2.90 m) until 1910, after a conference of the states created a new standard of 10 ft 6 in (3.20 m), with corresponding increase in track centres. The narrow widths have mostly been eliminated, except, for example, at the mainline platforms at Gosford railway station and some sidings. The longest carriages are 72 ft 6 in (22.10 m).[citation needed]

The Commonwealth Railways adopted the national standard of 10 ft 6 in (3.20 m) when they were established in 1912, although no connection with New South Wales was made until 1970.[citation needed]

A double deck Electric Tangara train of the late 1980s was 3,000 mm (9 ft 10.1 in) wide. Track centres from Penrith railway station to Mount Victoria railway station and Gosford and Wyong have been gradually widened to suit. The proposed Korean manufactured intercity sets are however 3,100 mm (122.0 in) wide, so further, costly modification was required beyond Springwood,[48] which was completed in 2020.[49]

The 1968 built Kwinana-Kalgoorlie standard gauge railway in Western Australia was built with a loading gauge of 12 ft (3.66 m) wide and 20 ft (6.1 m) tall to allow for trailer on flatcar (TOFC) traffic.[50]

Broad gauge

Main article: Broad-gauge railway

Indian Gauge

5 ft and Russian gauge

In Finland, the rail cars can be up to 3.4 m (11 ft 2 in) wide with a permitted height from 4.37 m (14 ft 4 in) on the sides to 5.3 m (17 ft 5 in) in the middle.[54] The track gauge is 1,524 mm (5 ft), differing 4 mm (532 in) from the 1,520 mm (4 ft 11+2732 in) Russian track gauge.

The Russian loading gauges are defined in standard GOST 9238 (ГОСТ 9238–83, ГОСТ 9238–2013) with the current 2013 standard named "Габариты железнодорожного подвижного состава и приближения строений" (construction of rolling stock clearance diagrams [official English title]).[55] It was accepted by the Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification to be valid in Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Armenia.[55] Loading gauge is generally wider than Europe, but with many exception standards.

The standard defines static envelopes for trains on the national network as T, Tc and Tpr. The static profile 1-T is the common standard on the complete 1520 mm rail network including the CIS and Baltic states. The structure clearance is given as S, Sp and S250. There is a tradition that structure clearance is much bigger than the common train sizes. For international traffic, the standard references the kinematic envelope for GC and defines a modified GCru for its high-speed trains. For other international traffic, there are 1-T, 1-VM, 0-VM, 02-VM and 03-VMst/03-VMk for the trains and 1-SM for the structure clearance.[55]

The main static profile T allows for a maximum width of 3,750 mm (12 ft 3+58 in) rising to a maximum height of 5,300 mm (17 ft 4+1116 in). The profile Tc allows that width only at a height of 3,000 mm (9 ft 10+18 in), requiring a maximum of 3,400 mm (11 ft 1+78 in) below 1,270 mm (50 in), which matches with the standard for train platforms (with a height of 1,100 mm [43.3 in]). The profile Tpr has the same lower frame requirement but reduces the maximum upper body width to 3,500 mm (11 ft 5+1316 in). The more universal profile 1-T has the complete body at a maximum width of 3,400 mm (11 ft 1+78 in) still rising to a height of 5,300 mm (17 ft 4+1116 in).[55] Exceptions shall be double-stacking, maximum height shall be 6,150 mm (20 ft 2+18 in) or 6,400 mm (20 ft 11+1516 in).

The structure gauge S requires buildings to be placed at minimum of 3,100 mm (10 ft 2+116 in) from the track centreline. Bridges and tunnels must have a clearance of at least 4,900 mm (16 ft 1516 in) wide and 6,400 mm (20 ft 11+1516 in) high. The structure gauge Sp for passenger platforms allows 4,900 mm (16 ft 1516 in) only above 1,100 mm (3 ft 7+516 in) (the common platform height) requiring a width of 3,840 mm (12 ft 7+316 in) below that line.[55] The exceptions shall be double-stacking, minimum overhead wiring height must be 6,500 mm (21 ft 3+78 in) (for maximum vehicle height of 6,150 mm [20 ft 2+18 in]) or 6,750 mm [22 ft 1+34 in] (for maximum vehicle height of 6,400 mm [20 ft 11+1516 in]).

The main platform is defined to have a height of 1,100 mm (43.3 in) at a distance of 1,920 mm (75.6 in) from the center of the track to allow for trains with profile T. Low platforms at a height of 200 mm (7.9 in) may be placed at 1,745 mm (68.7 in) from the center of the track. A medium platform is a variant of the high platform but at a height of 550 mm (21.7 in).[55] The latter matches with the TSI height in Central Europe. In the earlier standard from 1983, the profile T would only be allowed to pass low platforms at 200 mm (7.87 in) while the standard high platform for cargo and passenger platforms would be placed no less than 1,750 mm (68.9 in) from the center of the track.[56] That matches with the Tc, Tpr and the universal 1-T loading gauge.

Iberian gauge

Main article: Iberian-gauge railways

In Spain, rail cars can be up to 3.44 m (11 ft 3.5 in) with a permitted height of 4.33m (14 ft 2.5 in) and this loading gauge is called iberian loading gauge. It is the standard loading gauge for conventional (iberian gauge) railways in Spain. In Portugal, there are three railway loading gauge standards for conventional (iberian gauge) railways: Gabarit PT b, Gabarit PT b+ and Gabarit C. Gabarit PT b (also called CPb) and Gabarit PT b+ (also called CPb+) allow rail cars to be 3.44 m (11 ft 3.5 in) wide with a permitted height of 4.5 m (14 ft 9 in), although CPb+ has a slightly larger profile area. Gabarit C allows rail cars to be 3.44 m (11 ft 3.5 in) wide with a permitted height of 4.7 m (15 ft 5 in). Gabarit PT b and PT b+ are both used, being PT b+ more common overall. Gabarit PT c is not used. In Lisbon, there is a suburban railway line, the Cascais Line, that follows a fourth non-standard loading gauge.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2020)

Irish Gauge

Main article: 5 ft 3 in gauge railways

Ireland and Northern Ireland

Main articles: Iarnród Éireann and NI Railways

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2022)


This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2022)


This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2022)

Narrow gauge

Main article: Narrow gauge railways

Narrow gauge railways generally have a smaller loading gauge than standard gauge ones, and this is a major reason for cost savings rather than the railgauge itself. For example, the Lyn locomotive of the Lynton and Barnstaple Railway is 7 feet 2 inches (2.18 m) wide. By comparison, several standard gauge 73 class locomotives of the NSWR, which are 9 feet 3 inches (2.82 m) wide, have been converted for use on 610 mm (2 ft) cane tramways, where there are no narrow bridges, tunnels or track centres to cause trouble. The 6E1 locomotive of the 1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in) South African Railways are 9 feet 6 inches (2.9 m) wide.

A large numbers of railways using the 762 mm (2 ft 6 in) gauge used the same rolling stock plans, which were 7 ft 0 in (2.13 m) wide.

Great Britain

Ffestiniog Railway

Main article: Ffestiniog Railway

Lynton and Barnstaple Railway

Main article: Lynton and Barnstaple Railway

Builder's photo of Lyn

Japan, narrow gauge

Main article: Rail transport in Japan

Translation of legend:

The Japanese national network operated by Japan Railways Group employs narrow gauge 1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in). The maximum allowed width of the rolling stock is 3,000 mm (9 ft 10 in) and maximum height is 4,100 mm (13 ft 5 in); however, a number JR lines were constructed as private railways prior to nationalisation in the early 20th century, and feature loading gauges smaller than the standard. These include the Chūō Main Line west of Takao, the Minobu Line, and the Yosan Main Line west of Kan'onji (3,900 mm or 12 ft 10 in height). Nevertheless, advances in pantograph technology have largely eliminated the need for separate rolling stock in these areas.

There are many private railway companies in Japan and the loading gauge is different for each company.[59]

South Africa

Main articles: Rail transport in South Africa, Transnet Freight Rail, and Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa

The South African national network employs 1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in) gauge. The maximum width of the rolling stock is 3,048 mm (10 ft 0 in) and maximum height is 3,962 mm (13 ft 0 in),[59] which is greater than the normal British loading gauge for standard gauge vehicles.

New Zealand

Main articles: Rail transport in New Zealand and Kiwi Rail

The railways use 1,067 mm (3 ft 6 in) gauge. The maximum width of the rolling stock is 2,830 mm (9 ft 3 in) and maximum height is 3,815 mm (12 ft 6+14 in).[60]


Structure gauge

Main article: Structure gauge

Increasing the structure gauge can involve substantial work. The UK's Midland Main Line being upgraded in 2014.

The structure gauge, which refers to the dimensions of the lowest and narrowest bridges or tunnels of the track, complements the loading gauge, which specifies the tallest and widest allowable vehicle dimensions. There is a gap between the structure gauge and loading gauge, and some allowance needs to be made for the dynamic movement of vehicles (sway) to avoid mechanical interference causing equipment and structural damage.

Out of gauge

While it may be true that trains of a particular loading gauge can travel freely over tracks of a matching structure gauge, in practice, problems can still occur. In an accident at Moston station, an old platform not normally used by freight trains was hit by a train that wasn't within its intended W6a gauge because two container fastenings were hanging over the side. Analysis showed that the properly configured train would have passed safely even though the platform couldn't handle the maximum design sway of W6a. Accepting reduced margins for old construction is normal practice if there have been no incidents but if the platform had met modern standards with greater safety margin the out of gauge train would have passed without incident.[61][62][63]

Trains larger than the loading gauge, but not too large, can operate if the structure gauge is carefully measured, and the trip is subject to various special regulations.


See also


  1. ^ "Glossary". uk. Network Rail. Archived from the original on 6 May 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
  2. ^ "European Loading Gauges". Archived from the original on 13 February 2010.
  3. ^ Douglas Self. "A Word on Loading Gauges". Archived from the original on 3 March 2016.
  4. ^ "HS2 Cost and Risk Model Report" (PDF). p. 15. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2013.
  5. ^ a b c "European Loading Gauges". Modern Railways. April 1992. Archived from the original on 13 February 2010. Images do not load
  6. ^ a b c "GE/GN8573 Guidance on Gauging, Issue 3" (PDF). London: Rail Safety and Standards Board. October 2009: 20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 September 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2013. ((cite journal)): Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ "EUR-Lex - 32002D0735 - EN - EUR-Lex". Archived from the original on 19 October 2015.
  8. ^ a b c Mike Smith (2003). "Track Gauge & Loading Gauge". Archived from the original on 12 August 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
  9. ^ "Leaflet 506 – Rules governing application of the enlarged GA, GB, GB1, GB2, GC and GI3 gauges". Archived from the original on 7 October 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2009.
  10. ^ EUR-Lex (28 July 2006). "TSI CR WAG; 02006D0861-20130124; Annex C: Track interaction and gauging". Archived from the original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 7 October 2015.
  11. ^ "Verladerichtlinien der DB Schenker Rail AG (UIC – Verladerichtlinien); Tafel 1 Sammlung der Lademasse" (in German). 1 July 2014. Archived from the original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  12. ^ Jacques Molinari (April 1999). "Transport combiné et infrastructures ferroviaires; Compléments 1 – Terminologie – Chargements – Gabarits – Institutions" (PDF) (in French). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  13. ^ Boysen, Hans E. (December 2014). "Øresund and Fehmarnbelt high-capacity rail corridor standards updated". Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management. 4 (3): 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.jrtpm.2014.09.001.
  14. ^ Handschin, Matthias (22 September 2003). Rollmaterial [rolling stock]. BTS Bahn Technik - Seminar 2003 (in German). Bern: SBB. pp. 51–52.
  15. ^ "Gauging - The V/S SIC Guide to British gauging practice" (PDF). Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB). January 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 3 August 2015.
  16. ^ "Freight Opportunities Stage 2 Part 3 – Available Space Assessment – ISO Container Routes" (PDF). Rail and Safety Standards Board. September 2007. 7481- LR- 009 issue 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011. (2 Definitions)'W' Gauge. A set of static gauges that defines the physical size of freight vehicles. [...] (3 Methodology) It was assumed that the container / wagon combinations under consideration already conform to the dimensions set out in the lower sector structure gauge. Therefore, only structural clearances above 1,100 mm (43.31 in) above rail level were assessed.
  17. ^ "The V/S SIC Guide to British gauging practice" (PDF). Rail and Safety Standards Board. January 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2016. Retrieved 19 February 2018. Mark 3 coaches are labeled C3 restriction and Class (Pendolino) trains are labeled C4. These do not refer to any standard gauge.
  18. ^ "GE/GN8573" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2011. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
  19. ^ "Business Plan 2004 – Network Capability" (PDF). Network Rail. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2012. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
  20. ^ a b c "Felixstowe South reconfiguration inspector's report, Strategic Rail Authority submission". Department for Transport. Archived from the original on 10 February 2010. Retrieved 21 July 2017.((cite web)): CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  21. ^ "Megafret" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 July 2015. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  22. ^ a b c "TEN PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT SCHEMES IN SCOTLAND". Freight on rail. Archived from the original on 18 November 2008. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
  23. ^ "Standard Shipping Containers". Container container. Archived from the original on 7 July 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
  24. ^ "24 November 2006 Freight RUS Consultation Response National RUS" (PDF). Central Railways. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2008. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
  25. ^ a b "Freight RUS" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 March 2012. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
  26. ^ "Strategic Freight Network: The Longer-Term Vision". Department for Transport. Archived from the original on 4 May 2011. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
  27. ^ "New SRA Gauging Policy Aims to Make Best Use of Network Capability" (PDF). Department for Transport. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 May 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
  28. ^ Robbins, Michael (February 1959). "The Size of the Tube". Railway Magazine. pp. 94–96.
  29. ^ "Spårteknik – Fritt utrymme utmed banan" (PDF) (in Swedish). Trafikverket. 15 May 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 January 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2012.
  30. ^ a b c d e f Car and Locomotive Cyclopedia of American Practice (1970 ed.). Association of American Railroads Mechanical Division. 1970. pp. 71–74. OCLC 5245643.
  31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Preload Inspection Checklist and Equipment Plate Diagrams Archived February 24, 2021, at the Wayback Machine
  32. ^ "Clearance maps for CSX, a typical major carrier". Archived from the original on 10 December 2012.
  33. ^ Car and Locomotive Cyclopedia of American Practice (1984 ed.). Association of American Railroads Mechanical Division. 1984. pp. 91, 92. OCLC 5245643.
  34. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Guide to Railcars". 31 October 2011. Archived from the original on 31 October 2011.
  35. ^ April 2001 Official Railway Equipment Register "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2012.((cite web)): CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 April 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2012.((cite web)): CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  36. ^ April 2001 Official Railway Equipment Register "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2012.((cite web)): CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 April 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2012.((cite web)): CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  37. ^ "Autorack" (PDF).[permanent dead link]
  38. ^ "Railway Line Clearances and Car Dimensions including Weight Limitations of Railroads in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Cuba". Railway Line Clearances and Car Dimensions Including Weight Limitations of Railroads in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Cuba. OCLC 10709088.
  39. ^ "NYC Fun Facts: Not All NYC Subway Trains Are the Same Size". Untapped Cities. 2 August 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
  40. ^ Second Avenue Subway Draft Environmental Impact Statement, "Glossary" (PDF). (45.6 KiB)
  41. ^ Clarke, Bradley (1981). The Boston Rapid Transit Album. Cambridge, Mass.: Boston Street Railway Association. p. 8.
  42. ^ Fischler, Stanley I. (1979). Moving millions : an inside look at mass transit (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-011272-7.
  43. ^ 久保田博 (13 February 1997). 鉄道工学ハンドブック (in Japanese). グランプリ出版. pp. 148–149. ISBN 4-87687-163-9. 和書.
  44. ^ National Standard GB146.1–83 Rolling stock gauge for standard gauge railways
  45. ^ Janes World Railways
  46. ^ 鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令等の解釈基準 (PDF) (in Japanese). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.
  47. ^ a b NSCR and SLH bid documents at "Foreign Assisted Projects". 6 April 2021. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  48. ^ "New intercity trains too wide for rail line to stations in Blue Mountains". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 1 January 2017. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
  49. ^ Madigan, Damien (24 July 2020). "Rail upgrade completed to fit new trains on Blue Mountains Line". Blue Mountains Gazette. Retrieved 11 June 2021.
  50. ^ "Engineers Australia, WA SGR Nomination" (PDF).
  51. ^ Mundrey (1 September 2000). Railway Track Engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-463724-1.
  52. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2020.((cite web)): CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  54. ^ "Lastprofiler Finland" (in Swedish). Green Cargo. 15 December 2009. Archived from the original on 11 November 2011. Retrieved 18 September 2012.
  55. ^ a b c d e f "ГОСТ 9238-2013". 1 July 2014. Archived from the original on 15 April 2018.
  56. ^ "ГОСТ 9238-83 Габариты приближения строений и подвижного состава железных дорог колеи 1520 (1524) мм". Archived from the original on 17 September 2016.
  57. ^ Boyd, James (17 October 2002). Festiniog Railway. Vol. 2. p. 365. ISBN 0-85361-168-8.
  58. ^ "The Festiniog Railway". Rockhampton Bulletin. Qld. 17 April 1873. p. 3. Retrieved 3 December 2011 – via National Library of Australia.
  59. ^ a b Hiroshi Kubota (13 February 1997). Railway Engineering Handbook (in Japanese). Grand Prix publishing. p. 148. ISBN 4-87687-163-9.
  60. ^ "National Rail System Standard 6 – Engineering Interoperability Standards" (PDF). KiwiRail. 12 April 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 January 2016. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
  61. ^ The Railway Magazine April 2015, p12
  62. ^ "Here is a platform alteration". 17 February 2015. Archived from the original on 20 August 2016.
  63. ^ "Report 17/2015: Trains struck platform at Moston, Manchester". Rail Accident Investigation Branch. 7 October 2015. Archived from the original on 24 September 2016.

Further reading