Q1: Why is country X included in the list of Axis countries in the infobox?
A1: Because reliable sources, cited in the article, describe it as an Axis country. If you think that a country presently included in this list should NOT be included in it, please describe why reliable sources do not support it being included here, and if possible provide sources backing up this position. Particularly in the case of Finland, this has been discussed many, many times, so please review the talk-page archive to see if you have any new points to raise on this topic.
Q2: Why is country X NOT included in the list of Axis countries included in the infobox?
A2: Only the countries for which reliable sources have been found, describing the country unambiguously as a member of the Axis, should be included. If you think a country should be added to the list, please provide reliable sources that clearly and unambiguously state that they were members of the Axis. Please note that particularly Vichy France, Iraq, Spain, the Soviet Union, and the various puppet-states of the Axis outside of the ones that are included in this list have been discussed a large number of times here, so please review the discussions before opening a new discussion to see if the point you want to make has already been discussed.
Q3: Why aren't only Tripartite Pact signatories included as Axis members in the infobox?
A3: Because this article is not about the Tripartite Pact, which has its own article. Similarly, it is also not about the Anti-Comintern Pact. Instead it is about the Axis, which reliable sources describe as having a membership different to that of the Tripartite Pact and the Anti-Comintern Pact.
Q4: Why aren't puppet states and colonies included as Axis members in the infobox?
A4: Some puppet states may be included as members of the Axis powers where there are reliable sources stating that this is what they were, however, where no source says that a country was a member of the Axis, simply having been a puppet state or colony of a member of the Axis is insufficient to make it a member of the Axis if reliable sources do not describe it as such.
Q5: Why are other states, that were not members of the Axis, discussed in the body-text of the article?
A5: States and movements that had notable relations with the Axis, for example states the leadership of which gave serious consideration to joining the Axis, should be discussed to the extent relevant. Relevance should be decided in consensus with other editors - if in doubt, please discuss on the talk page here.
Q6: Why was membership of the Axis, as listed in the infobox, decided to only include those clearly and unambiguously described as being members of the Axis in reliable sources?
A6: In a discussion on the talk page in January 2021 it was decided to remove all countries which no reliable sources clearly described as being a member of the Axis. The reasoning was that by including countries that no reliable source actually identified as Axis powers but which some editors had characterised as "Axis co-belligerents", a term with no basis in reliable sources, we were essentially engaging in original research and going outside the topic of the article, which is about the Axis powers and not about wars fought parallel to the wars fought by the Axis.
Q7: I disagree with the criteria used to determine what should be included as a member of the Axis in this article!
A7:Consensus can change, please feel free to open a discussion here about how you think the article should address the question of which states should be included as members of the Axis in this article. Please also review the prior discussions in the archive to see whether your proposed way of deciding Axis membership has already been discussed.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:24, February 28, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Axis powers is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Co-Belligerents to the axis powers (Iraq and Vichy France) should be mentioned in the info box like how Co-Belligerents of the allies are mentioned in their info box.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Salfanto (talk • contribs) 16:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No. This article is about the Axis Powers. Therefore, in the infobox, it lists the Axis powers, not countries that weren't Axis powers.
"Co-belligerents of the Axis powers" wasn't, historically, a thing. The only country whose wartime government claimed to have been a "co-belligerent" of the Axis was Finland, but this was seen as a position taken simply for propaganda purposes even at the time, was denied by the post-war government of Finland and the Allies, and is not a position agreed with even by the majority of Finnish historians surveyed on the subject, let alone those in other countries. Numerous sources simply identify Finland as having been an Axis country.
Specifically in the case of Vichy France and Iraq, does any source actually describe these places as "co-belligerents"? Let alone "co-belligerents of the Axis powers"? FOARP (talk) 11:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes. Führer Directive No. 30 ordered German support for Iraq's Arab nationalists. In Vichy France's case, they fought against the allies in North Africa, Syria and Lebanon and did "anti-partisan" work in occupied france. Salfanto (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Führer Directive No. 30 isn't a source for that. A secondary source specifically referencing "co-Bellierants" is needed. DeCausa (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Salfanto - Führer Directive No. 30 ordered German support for Iraq's Arab nationalists - Führer Directive No. 30 was not an alliance of any kind. It also did not confer any particular status on the recipients of the aid granted under it. Führer Directive No. 30 also was explicitly compared the aid being given to Iraq to that given to Spain - was Spain also an Axis member? Or even a co-belligerent of the Axis?
WW2 is possibly the most written-about part of global history. If any country had been a memeber of the Axis, secondary sources would say as much without caveats. If there is not a single secondary source explicitly identifying Iraq as having been a member of the Axis, or even a "co-belligerent" (whatever that would mean in this context), then it is difficult for anyone to make the case that Iraq was an Axis member or "co-belligerent". We have a number of sources that list the Axis powers. They, at most, typically list the countries already in the infobox. None lists Iraq or Vichy France as having been an Axis power.
The topic of this article is "the Axis Powers". There is no reason to list countries that were not Axis Powers in the infobox. This is a topic that has been absolutely done to death on this page, particularly as once Iraq and Vichy France were added, people inevitably tried to add the Soviet Union (who actually did sign an alliance with Germany, and attacked a member of the Allies). See particularly the discussions linked in the FAQ above. FOARP (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 November 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "Oshima Hiroshi" to "Hiroshi Oshima" Xirevam (talk) 12:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 November 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Finland was not in the Axis it just worked with it please edit this Crewe50 (talk) 02:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's no sense of "in the Axis" that applies to all the rest but not Finland. Finland was at war with the Soviets and the British. German and Finnish troops fought side by side. Finland signed the same kind of armistice and peace terms as the other lesser Axis powers, admitting to having been "an ally of Hitlerite Germany". It is misconception that Finland was somehow in a different class from Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. Srnec (talk) 03:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Crewe50 - Basically what @Srnec said, plus plenty of reliable sources identify Finland as a member of the Axis, whereas few explicitly state that it wasn't and that appears to be a minority point of view (see, e.g., the newspaper poll of Finnish historians cited in the article). To the extent that the official position of the Finnish wartime government that they were only "co-belligerents" actually matters, this is covered extensively in the article and is also mentioned in a footnote in the infobox. Suffice it to say that it is not only the government that Finland had 80 years ago that gets to decide this, but Finnish post-war governments (who signed a treaty saying they had been an ally of Nazi Germany), historians (Finnish and non-Finnish) also took a point of view on this.
I also have to note that all of this stuff about the infobox is answered in depth already in the FAQ and has been discussed many, many times on here. The key discussion was this one where there was a consensus to remove the "co-belligerent" class entirely as it was not sourced. FOARP (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The picture with the Samurai is labeled: "Japanese poster illustrating the strength of the Tripartite Pact, with samurai warrior sinking British and American ships, and the naval ensigns of the three powers flying behind him." According to the File Data and followig the WIKIMEDIA "Category:Posters by Gino Boccasile" (which is the author) this poster is Italian propaganda and not Japanese. Please correct text underneath the picture. Thanks Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 10:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The main map at the start of the article shows a tiny sliver of land east of india as being a separate entity as part of the Axis. Unless this is some rebel movement i don't know about, I suggest it be removed and made part of British India.
Also, the Vichy French borders are shown, but Vichy France itself is colored as though it were part of the Allies. Should it not be the opposite (or neutral for that matter)? Havzali (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that the map is bad and should probably be replaced, preferably with a public domain image rather than something editor-created. FOARP (talk) 10:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should we add a "until September 1943" to Italy?[edit]
There already is a footnote that explains the Italian surrender to the Allies (and the subsequent creation of the Italian Social Republic by Germany). Havzali (talk) 23:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Additionally, every one of the Axis powers was a member of the Axis until a specific date. A number of Axis members (e.g., Finland, Bulgaria, and Romania, as well as Italy) effectively fought on both sides. Why single out Italy? And why only the end-date, why not include the joining date as well?
The article already explains these things. We just don't put them in the infobox (which is the thing that people commenting here are almost universally responding to) because that is not what the infobox is for. The infobox is for presenting very basic and immediate data, including which countries are identified by reliable source as Axis powers because that is the subject of this article. FOARP (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Where is Vichy France, Iraq, Manchuako, and Mengjiang. 136.33.235.64 (talk) 01:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Vichy France one could argue was not part of the Axis. They were collaborating with the Germans, yes, but they weren't military participating against the Allies and the US and UK still had embassies to Vichy until 1941. They "fought" against Vichy forces in operation Torch, but that still doesn't mean they became a part of the Axis. In fact, shortly after Torch, the Germans just ended Vichy's existence, due to most French generals in Africa defecting to the Allies.
-
Iraq was supported by Germany, Italy and Vichy but they never signed an official treaty or anything with regards to joining the Axis.
-
Manchukuo and Mengjiang, you might as well consider these to be colonies. As the map states, it says "Axis powers and their colonies". Havzali (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The real answer to this is: where is the sourcing identifying these places explicitly as Axis powers? Remember that the subject of this article is the Axis powers, not (primarily anyway) the areas they controlled through local puppets, or had deals with. For example, was Iraq ever actually a member of the Axis, rather than just briefly supported by the Axis? The sourcing present in the article doesn't seem to say so. Instead it explicitly points out that the Iraqi leaders never entered a formal alliance with the Axis, and that Italy did not want an alliance with Arab states. We even have two-three sources that list the Axis Powers but don't include these places - surely if they were actually Axis powers, then they would have been included by these sources.
In Paradox games and elsewhere, these places could all be members of the Axis, but this is not a Paradox game, this is an encyclopaedia where we summarise what is said in reliable secondary sources, and we should not include places as having been Axis powers without any sources explicitly saying so. FOARP (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
However, the Manchukuo article states (see history for attribution):
"In the 1940s the Vatican established full diplomatic relations with Japan, but it resisted Japanese and Italian pressure to recognize Manchukuo and the Nanking regime."
This seems like a contradiction, but correct me if I'm wrong.
@Henry James Gomerson - Agreed. Our article on Manchukuo explains that this is a misimpression that came from the Bertolucci film, The Last Emperor. This source and this source appear to confirm that the Vatican did not recognise Manchukuo. No source is given on this page for the diplomatic relations of Manchukuo so you can simply delete the unsourced material. FOARP (talk) 13:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]