This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
This template apparently defaults to add several categories (Food and drink articles needing attention to referencing and citation, Food and drink articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy, Food and drink articles needing attention to structure, Food and drink articles needing attention to grammar, Food and drink articles needing attention to supporting materials, Food and drink articles needing attention to accessibility) unless they are turned off ("=no"), which seems very unhelpful to me. This automatically mis-categorizes hundreds of articles that have no such problems, rendering those categories useless for identifying the ones that do. These categories should remain off by default, unless someone identifies an actual problem that needs attention and adds "=yes". -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
regardless of whether future problems will be created, what about the (estimated) 15,000 Talk pages that, from a 2008 bot-created mis-tagging,
is still unfixed? (see 2008 hangover: six tags, 15,000 cases : below) Pi314m (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The talk pages of aproximately 15,000 articles have the following category tags:
Food and drink articles needing attention to referencing and citation
Food and drink articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
Food and drink articles needing attention to structure
Food and drink articles needing attention to grammar
Food and drink articles needing attention to supporting materials
Food and drink articles needing attention to accessibility
The problem has gone to HelpDesk, which sent it to BOTREQ, which sent it here, the project talk page. Now what - is there consensus that it's time to fix this, as good citizens, so that those tags mean something, after those places having all six together are fixed? Pi314m (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, it's much easier to understand what you are talking about if you use a template link the category, you can use ((cl)) or ((clc)) - the latter shows the page counts, as follows:
Category:Food and drink articles needing attention to referencing and citation (0)
No bot was involved, and it certainly didn't happen "back in 2008": once the WikiProject banner was so modified in 2009-12, the categories populated automatically. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed (at Talk:Manny's Deli that the lack of an assessment for the B-Class requirements populates an article into these six categories, regardless of whether it deserves to be there. We already have Category:Food and drink articles with incomplete B-Class checklists, which should adequately cover the non-assessed articles. Category:Food and drink articles needing attention to referencing and citation and similar categories should be reserved for those articles where a reviewer has indicated that there is a problem. --Metropolitan90(talk) 02:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for merger of Template:WikiProject Bacon[edit]
As this is to merge with two other templates, ((WikiProject Bacon)) and ((WikiProject Breakfast)) (into this one), the ((tfm)) banner doesn't seem to support multiple sources, so use the bare ((subst:tfm)).
-- 65.92.244.127 (talk) 05:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done I used Breakfast as the parameter because that is the heading of the discussion — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]