Hi 1996Larry! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 14 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hey there - you keep removing the age which has 2 references to back it up and replacing it with an age but no citation. Do you have a citation for her being in her twenties when she started on the Riordans? Because there are references for her being 18 when she started there. Please go to the talk page to discuss or I will have to revert your entry. ☕ Antiqueight haver 20:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Perfect (Ed Sheeran song).
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. irma.ie does not credit Beyoncé. Her name is not written there. Your assertion that Ireland combined the chart entries when the source you're using doesn't back up your claim is WP:OR. Ss112 17:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Perfect (Ed Sheeran song). Ss112 09:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Reply: My sincere apologies, Wikipedia, but please don't ever block me from editing. I didn't know I was vandalising the page you mentioned above. I felt I was adding the correct information in. - 1996Larry
Reply: I understand, Wikipedia, I'll try not to be disruptive ever again.
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kid Creole and the Coconuts discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nqr9 (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Reply: Sorry, I should be more careful.
Hi Larry. Thanks for your contributions to the project. As Ss112 noted above you need to be sure that any claim of fact you are adding to an article is backed by a reliable secondary source. Personal knowledge and hearsay don't count. Also if you get into a disagreement with someone over what belongs in an article this is almost always best resolved in a talk page discussion. WP:DR has useful tips for resolving these kinds of disagreements. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again for your work here and best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks for the information- 1996Larry
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1980, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey there - you appear to be editing as both logged in so your own name appears and logged out so that the IP address 92.61.202.127 appears, as per the comments on the Anthony Cronin page. Is that you? ☕ Antiqueight haver 20:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Reply: Anthony Cronin was born in 1928, not 1923. Sources which give his birth year as 1923 are incorrect. 1928 is his correct year of birth. I had to undo the last edit of the page, which gave his birth year as 1923. This page should be semi-protected to prevent vandalism once his year of birth is 1928. - 1996Larry
Reply: The sources which say 1923 is his year of birth are incorrect, every source from Ireland gives his birth year as 1928.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1979, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cool for Cats and Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I recommend that you finish lists such as List of UK top 10 singles in 1977 and List of UK top 10 singles in 1978 before putting them in the main space of Wikipedia. I have moved them to drafts where you can work on them until they are ready. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks, I'll get them finished as soon as possible. - 1996Larry
Reply: Thanks very much, and I hope to get them all completed very soon. - 1996Larry
Reply: I’ve just started to fix the 1970 page up, but it’s important for me to get every other year finished as well. Anyway, I’ll stay on track.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply: My pleasure. Hope the rest of the 1970s may be finished by the end of the year. - 1996Larry
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply: Thanks.- 1996Larry
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1979, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knock on Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1972, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Willy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, great work on the top 10 singles articles, - project I have been trying to progress with for a while (I was responsible for creating most of the pre-existing ones and improved the 2000s articles to their current standard). They are really coming along well. I just wanted to ask whether you could make sure you use "sortname" for all "The" artists when creating the pages, they should all be sorted by the name after "the". Thanks and keep up the great collaborative work. 109.174.173.230 (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Thank you so much. For some artists I have to use "The" and cannot use "sortname". I'll keep working very hard in the meantime. - 1996Larry
Yeah that makes sense, maybe we should create redirects for artists who don't qualify for an article where possible or create stubs for consistency of sorting, I'll look into it.
One query I have that you may be able to input, in 1952 and 1953 there was only a top 12 (with a few songs tied some weeks) so we have an article for top 12 for these years. A top 20 came into place in October 1954, so how would I handle that year. I skipped over it and started on 1955 for now but do I do the top 12 until October and then change to a top 10 with sufficient notes explaining the situation? 03md 11:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply: I'm not to sure how you'll be able to handle 1954, but no need to be panicking about what Way to do it. - 1996Larry
Thanks, I'all cross that bridge when I come to it. If there's no easy way of doing it I might stick to top 12 until the end of the year and start with top 10 only from 1955 with relevant notes explains the situation. BTW I'm going to create a table in my user space where we can update the progress on articles, I'll post you a link when it's up. 03md 13:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks. - 1996Larry
Hi mate, you'be probably seen that I've done the best job I can with 1954 (only needs images and a multiple entries section). Could you give it a look over. I've included top 12s up Until the end of September and then changed to a top 10 with notes (only one single where it spent 2 weeks at number 12 but one after the cut off date). Also notes on songs which returned to number 11 or 12 before the end of the year. 03md 17:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Satisfied so far with the table, and I was wondering if you could divide the 1954 singles section in half, with the first half featuring the top 12 hits of Jan-Oct 1954 and the second half listing the top 10 hits of Oct-Dec 1954. - 1996Larry
Thankyou, how does it look now? I've kept it as a single table but done the divide we use for different years. 03md 21:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Reply: In my opinion, it looks much better. I did a little bit of tiding up, and now it's up to Wikipedia to have their say. - 1996Larry -
Hi, I need your opinion on an issue regarding the official best-selling single of a couple of years. I realise its down to when the cut off date is for sales. In 1955, Wikipedia says it was "Rose Marie" by Slim Whitman while http://www.everyhit.com/chart1.html (which is usually reliable) gives it as "Give Me Your Word" by Tennessee Ernie Ford. In 1958 a similar situation - Wikipedia lists "Jailhouse Rock" by Elvis while the other source says the double-A side "All I Have to Do Is Dream"/"Claudette" by The Everly Brothers. Jailhouse Rock isn't even in the top 10 according to that other website. 03md 13:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Reply: The everyhit.com website is not always reliable, the Official Charts Company website has all the accurate information. - 1996Larry
Do you know if there is an official list for each year because Wikipedia only has the best-seller for each year unlike recent years. Its only those two years where I've found a difference between the two listings.
Reply: If I knew everything about the charts, I would be able to solve your question. - 1996Larry
What was your source for the end of year best-sellers you added for 1962 and the 1950s? The official charts website only lists end of year charts back to 2005. Just trying to cross-check to make sure it is all accurate. Great work on the articles. 03md 19:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply: No clue, 03md. - 1996Larry
Could you do me a favour? On the articles for 50s and 60s which are pretty much there with the odd addition, could you go through the notes and put them in the right order going doing the page. There are some pages where the last added notes are at the top of the article because I'be thought of something else that needs clarifying. Would be good to have that part consistent like the rest. I will make sure the note style itself is consistent at some point as well, ie "Figure includes [X] top 10 hits with the group..." etc..03md 14:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply: 03md, no need to panic, as everything is OK with all these pages. On the 1962 page, to make yourself less pressurised, I have added all the top 3 hits of the year. - 1996Larry
Thankyou. I know that it's all ok, just wanted to get the notes section reading A to Z down the page. I'm focusing on the other tables so just thought I'd ask if you'd mind tidying that up. If you look at 1957, the note for Reet Petite in chart debuts is Note P rather than Note A, that's what I mean03md 15:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply: 03md, I wouldn’t chance tidying it up, as I feel that the note for Reet Petite is fine as it is. It would be unwise sometimes to ask someone to tidy a section up, as they feel it is a waste of time. - 1996Larry
No worries 03md 16:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. When you move an article from User:1996Larry/List of UK top 10 singles in yyyy please remember to remove the 1996Larry/ from the title. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks. - 1996Larry
Reply: This page will be edited by another user before long. - 1996Larry
Can you please stop displaying blank information on the lists of top 10 songs you are working on? This is completely useless to readers of these articles unless there is actually information about the topic. So if Chart Debuts is just an empty table, keep it hidden until you have completed it. This is a very good compromise because you can come back to it anytime you want and unhide it when it is complete. Please think of the readers of these articles first. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, there is another user who is working on these pages with me, and he is currently compiling the list of UK Top 10 debutants of 1960 and 1961. I'm sure he knows that you're hiding the blank information on this page until it is filled in, and I appreciate you hiding it, but I sometimes don’t like blank information being hidden. - 1996Larry
I was wondering where you had gotten the info that "Take Good Care of My Baby" reached No. 2 in Ireland, because that conflicts with the cited source.--Tdl1060 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply: The Irish Charts were published in the Evening Herald in 1961, so that's why I have it there. - 1996Larry
Reply: It's in the book "Complete Guide to Ireland's Top Ten Hits 1954-79: The Definitive Listing of Ireland's Top Ten Hits 1954 - 1979" by Eddie Kelly.- 1996Larry
Hello, I'm LongLiveMusic. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Goodbye Jimmy, Goodbye, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks. - 1996Larry
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Kiss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1975, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Way Out West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top 10 singles in 1968, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi 1996Larry, can you take a look at the article's side captions please, as some of them are too long, poorly written or simply irrelevant to the table (WP:Caption). I've also found this chart record broken by Drake for inclusion. Cheers, -Theo Mandela (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Please don't create user pages for user that don't exist. Either create them at draft space or in your user space. Things like User:List of UK top 12 singles in 1952 are just going to be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Reply: CambridgeBayWeather, I am editing the 1952, 1953 and 1954 pages, as I consider it more appropriate for the number 11 and 12 singles from these years to be removed.:
Reply: CambridgeBayWeather, please don't attempt to block my page, I am not making any kind of vandalism. - 1996Larry
Could you do me a favour and update the entries by artist and chart debuts tables for 1952, 1953 and 1954, switching the entries to the correct order (where you’ve removed singles and moved into correct charting order in main table, it’s obviously affected the chart debuts). For example Winifred Atwell needs to be in Chart Debuts for 1953. 03md 14:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Reply: OK, 03md. I'll do my best. - 1996Larry
Thanks, I’ve been trying but it’s getting confusing with all the changes! Also there might be a few who have been removed from those years who had their first top 10 hit later in the 1950s/early 1960s 03md 14:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Note: Removing ((underconstruction))
tag as List of UK top 10 singles in 1997 has not been edited for 3 days – Waddie96 (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help once again with these. Just a question, how do we handle things like Michael Buble's Christmas album, which re-enters most years across December/January. Do we put the peak for that year (as I have done in the 2014 article) or all weeks up to that date. Similar problem with Ellie Goulding's Halcyon (entered in 2012, peaked in 2014), Ben Howard's Every Kingdom (entered in 2011, peaked in 2013) and Olly Murs' Right Place Right Time (re-entered several times between 2012 and 2014) I have found so far. --03md 20:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Yes, 03md. If a mistake ever happens, I'll correct it. - 1996Larry
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of UK top 10 singles in 2018, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Magnolia677, there is no need for reliable sources in this article. That's why I had to revert to the old edit before you removed it. - 1996Larry
Reply: Magnolia677, a consensus has already been reached that sources do not need to be added on List of UK top 10 singles in 2018. Your reversal of my edits has made me very frustrated. - 1996Larry
Reply: I can't say for sure, as I did not create that page. Anyway, I'll take your advice and be more careful when editing. We should all be very careful when editing pages on Wikipedia. - 1996Larry
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of UK top 10 singles in 1991. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Magnolia677, please don't block me from editing. I have the right to add material to Wikipedia, whether it is unsourced or not. - 1996Larry
Reply: 331dot, can you advise me on how to become an auto-confirmed user on Wikipedia? - 1996Larry
Reply: 331dot, i want you to advise me on how to add sources to a Wikipedia page, as I am having trouble doing so on the page "List of UK top 10 singles in 2018". - 1996Larry
Magnolia677, please stop harassing me about unsourced material. If I make edits to a Wikipedia page, please don't reverse them. I get very irritated when people reverse my edits. - 1996Larry
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of UK top 10 singles in 1966. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
You mentioned on Magnolia677's talk page that you don't need to provide sources for the list of top ten albums and singles pages because they are complete and accurate. Well, where are you getting this information? A website, a book, a magazine? Those are sources and you need to cite where you found this info. You can't keep it to yourself and you can't expect readers of Wikipedia to just believe you. Read WP:CITE to learn more, but the main reference templates you may be looking for are ((cite web)), ((cite book)), ((cite magazine)), ((cite news)). They all basically work the same.
Also, when signing your posts, you just need to use 4 tildes (like this: ~~~~); no need to type out your user name. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)You must have reliable sources for any content you add to an article. It is simply incorrect as you stated here that you don't. You will need to indicate that you understand that you need sources and you are able to add them in order to be unblocked. Any reviewer who is convinced of this may unblock you without consulting me further. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not making disruptive edits, I am making proper edits, and there is no reason why I should be blocked. I believe that it was wrong to have me blocked as I was making proper edits. I am not the sort of person who vandalises pages. I need to correct mistakes. That is my aim on Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
Given your insistence that you need not change how you edit and that unsourced editing is fine, I cannot unblock you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been editing pages for a long time on Wikipedia, and I have include sources on the odd occasion. Many users like 03md have commended me for helping them with creating pages on Wikipedia. All of sudden a guy called Magnolia677 tells me I am consistently disruptive at editing. He is talking absolute nonsense. I need to be unblocked and not be bothered by another user warning me about my edits. I am an editor with good faith and I want to correct mistakes. I also want to be advised on how to edit pages without being blocked.
Decline reason:
"The odd occasion" is not an adequate approach to providing sources for your edits. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe it was wrong to block me, as I was making fair edits, even if I did not include sources. My block should be reversed as the user Magnolia677 persistently reversed my edits on the Lists of UK top 10 singles pages from 1966 and 2018. He consistently advised me to include sources, but neither the user 03md nor myself included sources on the Lists of UK top 10 singles pages. These sources were put in by other users such as Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, who followed Magnolia677's advice. I feel that the user 331dot blocking me was wrong and unfair, because that could be a violation of Wikipedia's policy. Harassing fellow Wikipedia users about their unsourced edits, in my opinion, is like being trolled on social media. We have to put an end to this once and for all. We all need to have respect for Wikipedia editors, even if they do not add sources.
Decline reason:
You're supposed to source your edits. PhilKnight (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23137 was submitted on Nov 05, 2018 07:10:26. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 07:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Actually, having just seen your UTRS unblock request in which you explicitly reiterate your refusal to provide sources for your contributions, I have now upped your block to indefinite. You do not get to choose to ignore the parts of Wikipedia policy you dislike or find inconvenient, and you will not be unblocked without a commitment to provide sources for your edits. You can provide that commitment in your next UTRS request, as your current one is sure to be declined. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23142 was submitted on Nov 05, 2018 14:37:49. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
((infobox name|...))
);[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
);[[Category:Name]]
);((Foo stub))
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"((reflist-talk))
. Once you have added the template, click Save.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "
" to your talk page. Thank you.
((Help me|your question here ~~~~))
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Could you please help me out here? I don't understand what you have sent me here. I have Asperger's Syndrome and I am very confused as to what I have done to cause me to be blocked indefinately. I sincerely apologise if I did something wrong, but it wasn't intentional. I really enjoy editing pages on Wikipedia and I would like if you could unblock me. Please help me. Thank you very much, looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Reply: No worries, jmcgnh, I will do another edit on a different article excerpt, and this time, I will include more sources. - 1996Larry.
"Déjà Vu" is a song by American singer Beyoncé, featuring vocals by rapper Jay-Z. It was produced by Rodney "Darkchild" Jerkins and Beyoncé for her second solo album, B'Day (2006). "Déjà Vu" is an R&B song, which incorporates elements of the 1970s funk and soul music. Its music is largely based on live instrumentation, including bass guitar, hi-hat, horns, except Roland TR-808 drum machine, which is a non-live instrument. The song's title and lyrics refer to a woman being constantly reminded of a past lover.
"Déjà Vu" was released as the album's lead single to US radio stations on June 24, 2006. The song received generally mixed critical reviews. Many critics noted the similarities of "Déjà Vu" with Beyoncé's own 2003 song "Crazy in Love". Critics commended the assertiveness and the sensuality with which Beyoncé sings the lyrics and compared her vocal delivery to that of Tina Turner in the late 1980s. "Déjà Vu" and its Freemasons club remix version received three nominations at Best Remixed Recording, Non-Classical at the 2007 Grammy Awards. It was recognized as the Best Song of 2006 at the Music of Black Origin (MOBO) Awards.
Commercially, "Déjà Vu" peaked at number four on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart. It topped the Hot Dance Club Play chart, the Hot Dance Singles Sales chart, and the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. The song was certified gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). "Déjà Vu" peaked at number one on the UK Singles Chart and generally reached the top 20 in Europe. The song's accompanying music video was directed by Sophie Muller. About 5,000 fans petitioned online for a re-shoot of the video, complaining about, amongst other factors, the lack of theme, the wardrobe choice, and the seemingly sexual interactions between Beyoncé and Jay-Z.[1]
References
((help me))
Can you please unblock my account from Wikipedia? You may know that I did not include sources in my edits, and I sincerly apologise for that. I have made a commitment to including sources in my Wikipedia edits when I do get unblocked.
1996Larry
Reply: Kevin, the information in ((2nd chance)) is very complicated to me, as I have Asperger's syndrome, and I might need someone else to give me some help. - 1996Larry
Reply: 331dot, the good news is I have just given a demonstration of adding sources to articles. I have added a citation to an excerpt from the page "Déjà Vu (Beyoncé song)", using proper dates and web adressess.
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23163 was submitted on Nov 06, 2018 17:57:15. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 17:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Outside of his sporting life Enright worked as a caretaker at Mary Immaculate College.[1] He was married to Birdie and had three sons and a daughter.[2]
References
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked as I have accepted full responsibitly for what I have done on Wikipedia. My block was not in error, and I know that I was blocked for a good reason. I now understand that the reason why I was blocked was because of my repeated refusal to include sources in my Wikipedia edits and I apologise sincerely for that. I now accept that what I have done was not morally right and that the administrator who blocked me was being fair and meant well. I now intend to change my actions and commit to using sources in my future Wikipedia edits. I have done some editing demonstrations on my talk page, taking excerpts from two different Wikipedia articles which lack a reliable source. I used at least one or two sources in both excerpts and made sure that they were entireably reliable.
Decline reason:
This is a procedural decline; duplicate unblock request. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Reply: Thanks for telling me, 331dot. Hope I get a big approval from the reviewer. - 1996Larry
Reply: Magnolia677, I've done as best as I can on editing these excerpts, and I've used the best sources possible. I've just fixed up the Leonard Enright excerpt, putting in that he "worked as a caretaker in Mary Immaculate College", which is mentioned in one of the excerpt's sources. I'll try and do another excerpt, and this time I'll include more than two sources. In relation to Poimoi, he needs to learn that he cannot reverse edits like I used to do. He can learn from my mistakes. - 1996Larry
Reply: 331dot, I do accept the idea that "the best sources possible" might not be good enough. However, these sources I used were not unreliable and told the truth. I'll use proper sources in my future Wikipedia edits. - 1996Larry
Reply: No worries, 331dot. I'll be much more careful editing Wikipedia pages in the future.
As you disregarded my request that you not email me, I have removed your ability to send email. It will be restored if and when the block is removed. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Reply: No problem, 331dot. I'm not angry at you for removing my ability to send email. I'll keep in touch if there's anything you want to remind me about. - 1996Larry
"Eastside" is a song by American music producer Benny Blanco and American singers Halsey and Khalid.[1] The song was released on July 12, 2018 as Blanco's debut single.[2][3] The single has peaked at number 18 on the Billboard Hot 100.[4] Outside of the United States, it reached number one in the United Kingdom, Ireland, New Zealand and Singapore, and number two in Australia and Denmark.
References
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked as I have accepted full responsibitly for what I have done on Wikipedia. My block was not in error, and I know that I was blocked for a good reason. I now understand that the reason why I was blocked was because of my repeated refusal to include sources in my Wikipedia edits and I apologise sincerely for that. I now accept that what I have done was not morally right and that the administrator who blocked me was being fair and meant well. I now intend to change my actions and commit to using sources in my future Wikipedia edits. I have done some editing demonstrations on my talk page, taking excerpts from three different Wikipedia articles which lack a reliable source. I used at least one or two sources in all excerpts and made sure that they were entireably reliable. Once again, I apologise for my repeated disruptive editing on Wikipedia. My mission is to improve several Wikipeida articles which need reliable sources.
Decline reason:
Where is your citation that the single reached number two in Australia and Denmark? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Reply: Thanks, Starcheerspeaksnews. - 1996Larry
Hello, 1996Larry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks very much for sending this message. Unfortunately, I am currently blocked from editing Wikipedia, so I won't chance voting this time. - 1996Larry
"Tears" ("Tears for Souvenirs") is a song written by lyricist Frank Capano and composer Billy Uhr,[1] and was first recorded by Rudy Vallee in 1929.[2] It was made famous in a version recorded by Ken Dodd, released as a single in 1965. It reached No. 1 in the UK Singles Chart for five weeks and became the UK's best-selling single of 1965, as well as the UK's third-biggest selling single of the 1960s.[3] The song also reached No. 1 in the Irish Singles Chart.[4]
References
1996Larry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked as I have accepted full responsibility for what I have done on Wikipedia. My block was not in error, and I know that I was blocked for a good reason. I now understand that the reason why I was blocked was because of my repeated refusal to include sources in my Wikipedia edits and I apologize sincerely for that. In my last edit, an excerpt from the Wikipedia page on Ken Dodd's song "Tears", I gave the source for its chart position in Ireland. I decided to improve my commitment to including sources in my edits after I forgot to include the sources for the Australian and Danish chart positions in my edit on an excerpt from the Wikipedia page on Benny Blanco's "Eastside", which is the reason why my last unblock request was denied, and I accept full responsibility for not including them.
Accept reason:
The above text looks properly sourced to me. I believe this fulfills TheSandDoctor's second chance offer, and blocking admin 331dot has stated above that they have no objection. -- Scott (talk) 04:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of UK top-ten singles in 1980. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Reply: My apologies, Magnolia677. I promise to adhere to your advice from now on. Would you try and edit the pages yourself? - 1996Larry
Reply: Thanks, 331dot. Could you assist me in completing the UK top ten single and album pages and advise me what sources to include? - 1996Larry
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, List of UK top 10 albums in 2015, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, List of UK top 10 albums in 2015, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It appears to still be in draft form and needs clean up and expansion. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of UK top-ten singles in 2018. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Reply: Magnolia677, the page List of UK top-ten singles in 2018 does cite some sources, mainly from the Official Charts Company, which is why I edited it. I have made a commitment to including sources in my Wikipedia edits. Pages that have not been edited for a long time should be updated regularly. I get angry when my edits are reversed. Please don't warn me again. - 1996Larry
Reply: Magnolia677, the Kodak Black entry is sourced at the Official Charts website, as well as his Wikipedia discography. Please don't reverse my edits again. I am editing with good faith, and I can tell you that I never add any false information to any Wikipedia page. - 1996Larry
Reply: Magnolia677, I want you to help me update the page List of UK top-ten singles in 2018. You may not have a good knowlege of UK chart history like I do, but I want you to find some sources that may support this page. It cannot just be left alone. - 1996Larry
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of UK top-ten albums in 2011, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cass County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 1993, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Ball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 1971, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Every Good Boy Deserves Favour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 2016".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 2017".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 2000".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 1999".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 2001".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top 10 albums in 2015".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 12:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
With this edit you deleted the source to support this information. What is now the source to support it? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Reply: Hello again, Magnolia677, I have re-added the source I removed earlier from the page List of UK top-ten singles in 2018. I apologise for initially removing it, as I believed that there was a sufficient source to support the information. - 1996Larry
Thanks for creating List of UK top-ten albums in 1982.
User:Girth Summit while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Girth Summit))
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
GirthSummit (blether) 19:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boys of Summer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Please don't use "fix typo" in your edit summaries when you are doing much more than fixing typos. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks for reminding me, StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsStarcheerspeaksnewslostwars. - 1996Larry
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2010s deaths in rock and roll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Berman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mate, hope you’re well. Could you help me out with my current project, List of artists with the most UK top-ten albums, I have made a good start and obviously if you spot I have made any mistakes you can correct them, and add artists to the table. Please add a reference from the Official Charts website each time.
The minimum for the table is 10 top 10s, like for the top ten singles page, and individual acts get a spot if they have appeared on albums with more than one band or as a solo artist (e.g. Gem Archer of Oasis, Beady Eye and Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds).
I have a question mark over Lindsey Buckingham, who was on some Fleetwood Mac albums but trying to work out which ones, as well as solo work, and also Christine McVie is included in the personnel section on a couple of their early albums but not officially credited, I have included those within the figures for now. 03md 11:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Reply: Hello again, 03md. I'm more interested in updating the UK top-ten singles and albums pages from down through the years.
By the way, I was wondering if it would be possible for us to change the peak dates of the top-ten singles and albums pages from "week ending" to "week starting", as "week starting" would be the actual date the song entered the top-ten.
Example: 4th January 1975 (week ending), 29th December 1974 (week starting)
We already know that the consensus is that we should use the dates given by the Official Charts which are the week ending dates, but I would much prefer if the week starting dates were used to give the exact date when the songs and albums first entered the top-ten. Besides, the Offical Charts are not always 100% accurate online.
I have no problem at all with the week ending dates on Wikipedia, but I prefer the week starting dates.
Looking forward to hearing from you again very soon, 03md. - 1996Larry 11:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Reply: Hello again, 03md. I don't disagree with you about the fact that week ending is the policy of the OCC and also the fact that changing to week starting would mess up the pages, but I would much prefer if week starting was included instead of week ending. I'm glad though that you are focusing on finishing the last few albums chart pages from the 1950s and making improvements that need to be made to others, like adding entries by artist and chart debuts.
Looking forward to hearing from you again very soon, 03md. - 1996Larry 06:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 1955, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mambo Italiano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2020s deaths in rock and roll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blinding Lights. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ss112 01:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks for your advice, Ss112. - 1996Larry, 08:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Larry, there are a couple of problems with your edits on these articles.
Betty Logan (talk) 15:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks for telling me, Betty Logan. I'll be very careful when making edits on the film pages from now on. - 1996Larry, 15:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1945 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Lost Weekend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, please note that only the earliest release date is used in film infoboxes otherwise there would be dates from many countries, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks, Atlantic306. - 1996Larry
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1932 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shanghai Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2011 box office number-one films in the United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Apollo 18 and Delhi Belly.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Woolford.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tenet (film), you may be blocked from editing. AmblinX 11:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amy MacDonald.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm in the process of expanding this article. The film was pre-released (not premiered) on December 23, 1952 in New York City and on December 25, 1952 in Los Angeles. Then it was copyright in February 1953 and officially released in March 1953. The point of the pre-release was to make it eligible for Academy Award and other awards consideration for the 1952 calendar year, and by the time it opened in March, it had already won a bunch of awards. Still the copyright date is 1953, and that's what the page name and categories should say. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Yoninhah, the AFI website is not always accurate. The IMDB website, in my opinion is a much more accurate website. - 1996Larry 20:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Yoninhah, Wikipedia won't let me return to Come Back, Little Sheba (1952 film), because a redirect already exists and it cannot be deleted automatically. - 1996Larry 20:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks for your advice, Yoninhah. - 1996Larry 21:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Snows of Kilimanjaro (1952 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Greatest Show on Earth.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Last Christmas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Band Aid.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Beymer, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 13:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply: Understood, Largoplazo. – 1996Larry, 13:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 1996Larry reported by Largoplazo. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply: Thanks, ~ ToBeFree - 1996Larry, 18:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi 1996Larry, I hope you're well. Could you please explain why you add non-existent peaks of songs to List of UK top-ten singles in 2021? I have just reverted your recent addition, and it's not the first time you've done so. Please could you kindly not add peaks of songs which have yet to chart, and wait for the official chart update on Fridays? Even if there is a chance they could chart. This is a violation of of one of Wikipedia's core guidelines, WP:V, and is also misleading. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Reply: Hello there, AshMusique. Thanks for reminding me about add non-existent peaks of songs to List of UK top-ten singles in 2021. I'll remember not to do it again. Thank you. - 1996Larry (talk) 18:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of UK top-ten singles in 2021, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 1996Larry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of UK top-ten singles in 2021".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 1960, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Come Back to Sorrento.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In My Head.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunna.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encanto.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Morrison.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten singles in 1958, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maybe Baby.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Thank you.
Please don't use generic edit summaries like "Updated page". Use the edit summary to say what the edit you are making is for and why. 71.62.227.79 (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Why did you remove The Red Shoes as the top grossing film released in 1948? Among available references, the one that was already cited on that page was the Finzer book, but you just deleted all of that entirely from the list a few days ago. What's more, you then proceeded to cite that same Finzer book and same page as the source for earnings for The Paleface, a few spots lower on the list. This is wildly inconsistent.
You also changed Cass Timberlane from 1947 to 1948, though Cass Timberlane opened in NYC on November 6, 1947. Although its national release was not until January, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences rules it's considered a 1947 release.
You should not be making haphazard and arbitrary edits like this. I am still finding numerous references that you cited repeatedly over the past two years to the Variety Oct 1990 "All-Time Film Rental Champs" article, (all saying page M-150, which is just the letters "Cal" to "Clo" in middle of the article), to movies that are not even in that list! You need to go back and clean up your edits. You can't just make up sources for your numbers and leave a mess in your wake. Addypreston (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aitch.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Get Rollin'.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1961 in film, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birdy.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
I have never once seen you update Australian chart peaks on here... can I ask why you immediately updated the number one the minute the charts were released? [1] It would have gotten done within the next few minutes. Not saying you did anything wrong, but you don't need to rush to do it when you don't ordinarily touch Australian chart information. Ss112 07:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi 1996Larry. I can see someone's discussed this with you previously, but why are you updating this page before the UK chart is announced on a Friday afternoon (e.g., adding new entries to the top 10)? While there are chart updates published, this is all just speculation (i.e., not fact) until the official chart is announced on a Friday. AlligatorSky (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Order.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of UK top-ten albums in 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunna.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)