This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hello! Your submission of List of National Sports Award recipients in Olympic sports at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of List of National Sports Award recipients in Olympic sports at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 21:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I will be nice, and take my time (since I'm new to editing on this forum). But, you know as well as I do that Kropotkin was no communist in the modern sense (if you had read any of his writings without your agenda or ego interfering, then you would concede such) The term might not have been used in his day but by modern understandings he would most definitely be distinguished from todays mammoth centralized communist governments around the world. You know you are being disingenuine and so do I. True communism is only possible at the tribal level, and if you had any knowledge of anthropology then you would know that. "Mutual Aid" is the only reference I need, its spelled out pretty plainly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennybooboo78 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I thought you were the person editing my comments. I mistakenly changed some code I think (on accident) thinking it had something to do with editing-oops. Never meant to send you that comment, I think I meant it for the moderator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennybooboo78 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
A big friggin' thank you for your edit (or reversal). Couldn't make heads or tails out of what the other user tried to do.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I am unsure of why 2 of my articles were put into the draftspace. I had multiple references for each, and there are some articles that have the same amount of references and less information. One example of this is Campus Field, which has less information but the same amount of references. I used reliable sources, because I got the information directly from the school's website. Please let me know why the articles that I made were removed. --Ajax.amsterdam.fan (talk) 20:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello @Roller26,
I have been asked to help to edit this page.
To start off, this is my first Wikipedia submission, kindly bear with my incorrect approach in editing the page.
The main issue we want to clarify is that Agano Party is not associated with the former Prime Minister for Kenya. The references that are listed here have no information relating to Agano Party.
Added the official website for the party as well.
a. http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/143606 b. https://www.eisa.org/wep/ken2007parties2.htm c. https://info.mzalendo.com/organisation/ap/contact_details/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by A2346599921 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! -- Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Spread the New Year cheer by adding ((subst:New Year 2)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
Pratyush.shrivastava, thank you and Happy New Year to you too. Have a great 2021. Roller26 (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, using this format
((Edmonton City Council|x))
rather than plain text keeps the page updated with the current councillor, with no need to worry about outdated info. Can you please unrevert all these edits? 162.208.168.92 (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
I have shared a merge proposal on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Pal. Please take a look and respond if you agree with it. --Walrus Ji (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
• Citations do not present evidence of what is being stated, and rather lead to arbitrary websites with no related information. • Websites listed as references lead to websites seemingly hostile to the Catholic Church. • The only seemingly valid reference source seems to be a website that lists a concordat existing between the Church and the state of Poland, which itself seems to be a biased and hostile website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.127.214.94 (talk) 05:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Roller 26, I got a notice that my article was nominated for speedy deletion, and I would like to contest this. First this my independent write up and I am not in any way advertising or promoting anybody. This is what I have researched and made my findings on. I will like to request that my article is properly looked into and published. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omo078716 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The archive links you added at Indian Institutes of Management are unnecessary unless the original links actually die. If links do die, it is a good idea to check for website reorganization (esp. at the IIM sites themselves) being the cause, rather than relying on out-of-date archive links. When it's newspaper/magazine links, it's a good idea to check for reference relevance rather than relying on a possibly out-of-date story. Remember that the archive links should exist, whether we use them now or not, as the archive sites can and do monitor the setting up of the original reference links and prioritize their archiving accordingly. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Greetings to you, Thank you for your valued feedback. I truly salute you for trying to assure quality and for your attention to detail.
Please allow me to contest your suggestion humbly.
First, all that was written about the individual is in the public domain and is from credible sources from three different continents, namely North America, Europe and Africa.
Secondly, based on my research and triangulation I can confirm that several independent and reputable sources such as websites of Cambridge University, Aston University, University of Leicester, Coventry University, Independent Newspaper in the UK, Varsity and CSRWire have confirmed many of the sentences that I wrote. I
Thirdly, I have also taken direct quotes from the various credible sources to buttress the article in some cases.
Fourthly, this is an example of an individual who has consistently demonstrated impact over ten years across various continents and would be of interest to the general public.
Fifthly, this article's content is accurate, objective and consistent. It represents an example of a Black British, making a positive difference to society. Hence, this article champions excellence in diversity, inclusivity as a contemporary subject, especially with the Black Live matters campaign.
Finally, even though there is a lot of complimentary content about the topic available in the public domain, I had to use my editorial judgment not to include this not to appear promotional.
I look forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omo078716 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
hello. can my name be add to here for this list? have i qualification for that award?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Understood your point on other matters. There is no COI with the person involved. Most of the content is independently researched, and referenced as well as photographic evidences are collected from Anshul Kothari wherever there is doubt on authenticity. Upon verification, the page has been edited accordingly.
However, Please specify a valid reason to remove the "Awards" section on page of Anshul Kothari? Do you need photographic evidence? If yes, please request so. Please avoid unnecessary removal of verifiable content without further discussion Maverickswim (talk) 16:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
@Roller26: : Thank you for sharing knowledge about various wikipedia policies about reliable sources. Will follow it for future edits on any articles as well. Just a last clarification. Are social media posts from verified handles of a third party organization considered a reliable reference for main article as per wikipedia policies? Maverickswim (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
@Roller26: : Hello, I'm Maverickswim. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. In your earlier comments, you have made a severe conclusion that I am a undisclosed paid editor. I consider some of your statements a personal attack on a new user as per wikipedia policyWP:CIVIL WP:BITE. Please understand that I am not an experienced editor. Also I have no knowledge of coding or HTML which makes it difficult to edit an article in single attempt. Hence, I try to make small edits which ends in multiple attempts to finish an article. Also, I only have decent english language skills. Thus, I request you to show some empathy on new and inexperienced user.
As far as 35 edits are concerned, you may have noticed that lot of them are reference edits or addition of achievements with "reliable newspaper" references ( It took me multiple attempts to understand various codes and tags to write a reference). Also, since I don't have vast experience of editing, I resisted from editing multiple articles on Wikipedia so that content is not spoiled at multiple articles. Please understand mistakes about "POV" in 1-2 paragraphs doesn't make one a paid editor.
Thank you for giving links earlier about Wikipedia policies. Yes, now going forward, I am spending more hours to read various Wikipedia policy after you flagged concerns on POV tone . I am not an experienced contributor and still do not understand Wikipedia jargons. I saw that you are an experienced contributor. Hence, I request you to re-read this Wikipedia policy WP:BITE WP:IJME https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers
Regarding future edits on any article, Neutral POV tone will be maintained. However, if you find issues on references or content without references, please discuss instead of completely removing a work of new user like me. Regarding awards section in article of Mr. Anshul, you have mentioned that primary sources are accepted. Hence, whenever in future, award websites (primary sources) are updated, content will be added with reliable and relevant reference.
Hope we can reach an amicable consensus. Maverickswim (talk) 06:55, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
@Roller26: : Well , I never said I am not fluent in English. I said in humble manner "I have decent english skills". But you seem to have overlooked it in the heat of moment and its seems like attempt to get back at me. I just said I am not fluent in html tags or visual editor or whatever else jargons you use. You might feel it is simple to edit using templates, tags etc. However for me it is not simple, it took time to learn by making mistakes in my edits which is why number of edits increase and I still am not expert with it. You mention about 5600 bytes added. Yes with every attempt, I am getting better at editing rules, policies and other editing skills. Secondly, I never asked for a discussion on POV/ puff statements. I admit it is a mistake. The first time I reverted your change because I did not read POV policy at all and neither was I aware of policy. When you flagged for second time, I read the POV policy in detail and other policies you shared. Hence, going forward such mistakes will be avoided from my side on any edits on any article.
Anyways, I have made my attempt to reach agreement with you in a civil and polite manner. I have admitted my mistake on POV. I have not questioned your actions, in fact I thanked you on multiple occasions when you shared wiki policies. But your last few lines do feel as a threat. Either ways, happy editing!
Hi @Roller26 I am yet to get any update about my contribution that was deleted a few days ago. I sent you a justification on why I believe it should not be deleted but unfortunately I haven't heard back from you. Can you kindly let me know what the next step is? I would really appreciate this. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omo078716 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
hi, how does he fail notability ?
49. roles over Decades Award winner p Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Has had significant roles in Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 12:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
Hi, I am pexea12. I received your message about my edit in Vidit Gurajthi page and it was not a mistake. The part which was removed is:
.He also shared a behind the scene story on GRAPHY , how they become a champion of FIDE Online Chess Olympiad , how he and vice captain Srinath Narayan manage the team, and that also helps team management skills [15][16].
The reasons are:
However, you can write something like:
Vidit has a strong leadership and team management skills [15], [16].
I could not find a way to fix this sentence with these reasons so I decided to delete it. Feel free to discuss about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pexea12 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in Wikimedia Wikimeet India 2021 and your registration. I would request you that kindly resubmit your registration with the below same form available on our project page with an extra e-mail ID field.
Your email ID requires us to attend the events. We will send you the Zoom details (link + password) via email shortly before the event.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in Wikimedia Wikimeet India 2021 and your registration. I would request you that kindly resubmit your registration with the below same form available on our project page with an extra e-mail ID field.
Your email ID requires us to attend the events. We will send you the Zoom details (link + password) via email shortly before the event.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 18:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting my edits at List of highest-grossing media franchises. Do you know why my edits aren't being automatically accepted anymore for semi-protected articles? Maestro2016 (talk) 20:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
You are incorrect in changing a statement that assesses the length of the Iraq War compared to other wars in the middle east. The individual stated that the US war in Iraq would be less than 42 days. If you need clarification you can visit the Iraq War page to determine what year it started.
This was an incorrect prediction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACC 0011 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The article Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 07:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 13:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
On this edit you restored problematic content fraught with WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP violations by restoring undue and unfounded criticism about Modi and a statement of a Maharashtrian politician despite none of this ever had consensus on talk page, nor half the edits were ever discussed on the talk page.
Such use of misleading edit summary constitutes WP:DE. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 13:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wareon (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Do you even check edits before you revert them and give warnings to new people here? I corrected the redirect. --86.114.247.255 (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
the "artists" sort is not for musical artists or make-up artists... see the sort criteria. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have spotted 'Lakshmi Praneetha Kommuru' is not having any wiki page. Wondering if you can create one. She is International Chess Player with many Gold medals. Also she is first women who is Asian Champion and working with Google.
Achievements - 1. National U-13 Girls Chess Championship 2003(Ahmedabad) - Gold Medal 2. Asian U-12 Girls Chess Championship 2003 (Calicut) - Gold Medal 3. Commonwealth U-12 Girls Chess Championship 2003 (Mumbai) - Gold Medal 4. Commonwealth U-20 Girls Chess Championship 2004 (Mumbai) - Gold Medal 5. National Women Team Championship 2002 (Vijayawada) - 2nd place 6. State champion many times
FIDE rating - https://ratings.fide.com/profile/5022398
Few References - https://www.365chess.com/players/Praneetha_K_Lakshmi - chess games at 365chess.com https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/rohit-lakshmi-bag-gold/articleshow/19874.cms?from=mdr https://www.rediff.com/sports/2003/jun/12chessasian.htm https://old.fide.com/component/content/article/4-tournaments/2766-1257-india-won-13-medals-in-asian-youth-chess.html https://aicf.in/lakshmi-praneetha-emerges-leader-at-sangli/ https://www.thehindu.com/sport/other-sports/lakshmi-leads-ivana-holds-vijayalakshmi/article6535552.ece https://vitchessclub.blogspot.com/search?q=praneetha
LinkedIn Page - https://www.linkedin.com/in/praneelakshmi/
She also have patents in Data science space -
Thanks in advance and please let me know for more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.37.163.147 (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Dear Thanks for taking action against my article
i would like to let you know that for newspaper no resources where required on wikipedia only official website and front page of the news paper is required for publishing the article on main space
so this is a humble request to you that please once again check this and accept my request to published this article into the main article page
thanks