Hi! I am 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸. I am on a partial break from Editing at Wikipedia, due to personal reasons. I will be back soon; Leave me a message here.

Hello, I'm StartOkayStop. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to May 13 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. StartOkayStop (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text ((unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here)) at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)) at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vestrian24Bio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Nim.DeLaurent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Identity confimation

Decline reason:

If you want to use your real name as your username, you may, though we advise against it for security reasons. However, your username was not the only issue, you need to address your inappropriate edits that violated WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vestrian24Bio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

KCCian24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'm a paid Editor ND.Enterpriser (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Conditional unblock with the binding condition not to edit about ND Enterprisers again, as agreed to below. Violations of the restriction may lead to an immediate, hard-to-appeal reblock. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The disclosure requirements of the Terms of Use, described in WP:PAID, go beyond "I'm a paid editor". The unblock request recommendations of the community, described in WP:GAB, go beyond making a simple statement that doesn't even directly admit any wrongdoing. If you are paid to do this, it's your job to get this right, and you're currently not doing your job. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm paid by ND Enterprisers to edit their page at Wikipedia. I won't add advertising or promoting contents from now on. ND.Enterpriser (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I'm fine with trying an unblock after a rename. An account renamer will have a look at the request; this may take a while. In the meantime, you may like to explicitly agree not to edit about ND Enterprisers again, as this would resolve a remaining concern. Ideas for actually helpful contributions can be found at the Task Center and the community portal. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I Agree... ND.Enterpriser (talk) 14:37, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed, per request. --Yamla (talk) 22:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! KCCian24, you may now freely remove any messages from this page. The restriction not to edit about ND Enterprisers again remains binding even after deleting the messages, though. You could theoretically appeal it at WP:AN, but there is practically no point in doing so unless you become a very active and experienced Wikipedian one day, at which point it would be reasonable to lift the burden of the past from you formally. Not to allow you to resume editing about ND Enterprisers, but rather as a gesture of goodwill. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a welcome back to Wikipedia, KCCian24. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Windows 11 version history have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.

• For help, take a look at the introduction.

• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Windows 11 version history was changed by KCCian24 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952729 on 2023-03-09T06:18:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KCCian24! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Microsoft Edge version history, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployedge/microsoft-edge-relnote-archive-beta-channel, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Microsoft Edge version history and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Microsoft Edge version history, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Microsoft Edge version history. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Microsoft Edge version history with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Microsoft Edge version history saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 22:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KCCian24,

Please be careful with page moves. You need to have a very good reason to move an article to a different title and ideally you should start an article talk page discussion on the subject before you do an article move. We have a Manual of Style that dictates a lot of guidance about page titles and it's important to be consisten with the MOS and not just move articles to titles you prefer. If you have any questions about page titles or page moves, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed the User categories you had on this page. We put User categories on User pages but not User talk pages. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Windows 11, version 22H2, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows 11, version 22H2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KCCian24! Your additions to Big Match have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.

• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.

• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.

• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CUSTOMSIG/P says that A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username. That is not the case here, since your username is KCCian24, but you're signing posts as ŇƗΜŘØỮ Đ€ŁΔỮŘ€ŇŦƗŞ e.g. on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Cricket World Cup Qualifier. Please update your signature so it clearly identifies you (or request a username change if you want to be known as ŇƗΜŘØỮ Đ€ŁΔỮŘ€ŇŦƗŞ on Wikipedia). Joseph2302 (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me hoe to request a Username Change... I've been trying to do that in a while. ŇƗΜŘØỮ Đ€ŁΔỮŘ€ŇŦƗŞ (TALK) 01:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2027 Cricket World Cup qualification, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CWC 2023 Sponsors.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an advertising directory for the ICC, we don't need to add a list of every sponsor to 2023 Cricket World Cup. It's not encyclopedic content, and violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERTISING. Before attempting to re-add, please discuss at Talk:2023 Cricket World Cup and get consensus to do so. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CWC 2023 Sponsors.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vestrian24Bio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nimrou N. DeLaurentis for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Nimrou N. DeLaurentis to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. — Karnataka ^talk 13:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind simplifying your signature? The decorative characters make it unnecessarily troublesome for users and screen readers to interact with you in discussion pages. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy Is it okay Now? 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 [ᴛᴀʟᴋ] 11:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be better, thank you. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 14:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop unnecessarily adding content about the VMAs, including the Voting System and the VMA Block Party, although you might say that it's "related" to the VMAs, it still doesn't matter to its Wikipedia page, we don't use Voting Systems on Wikipedia pages, if you continue to do this, your edits will be removed by me. so again, please stop it. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:A5E6:3BA:A279:B590 (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide relevant Wikipedia Policies to justify your sayings. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 MTV Video Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Stewart. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such legend you are talking of and the numbers are not explained. If you can poijnt out where these things are that would be great otherwise the table is a clear violation of Manual of Style rules. PicturePerfect666 (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 03:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Template:2023 Cricket World Cup, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MOS:BOLD, MOS:FLAG and WP:DECORATIVE were all violated there Joseph2302 (talk) 16:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding flags to ((2023 Cricket World Cup))- they violate MOS:FLAG and in particular WP:DECORATIVE. Please do not add these again. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Understand, But How Come WP:DECORATIVE is relevant? It redirects to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions ... There aren't any deletion discussions. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 01:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you can use this to add Twitter links in articles instead of ((Cite web)). Kailash29792 (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ICC CWC 2023 - Captains' Ceremony.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ICC CWC 2023 - Captains' Ceremony.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined your speedy deletion request for Draft:2023 MTV Europe Music Awards as you did not provide a valid reason for speedy deletion. Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Additionally, you added a request to salt the title but there is no significant history of repeated recreation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sacnilk is considered an unreliable source, per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So other sources using sacnilk box office are also unreliable, as per WP:FRUIT. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Leo (2023 Soudtrack Album Cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the dumbest edit I have seen in a while. I can only assume you didn't read the article - It doesn't contani either "Champions" or "Trophy" and talks about semi-final qualification - and is for a completely different tournament. And the apparent belief that South Africa (who qualified 3 days ago, even on the ICCs web feed) are :not confirmed" is just so utterly hilarious. How are they going to finish 9th or 10th? How? How? Please do better. 110.33.28.251 (talk) 22:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lokesh Cinematic Universe, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2023 Cricket World Cup into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 14:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Notable Moments at the MTV Video Music Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vestrian24Bio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Grey Part of Blue (2019 short film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vestrian24Bio,

I'm not sure why you are doing this but please stop moving around your User pages, changing your mind and then moving them to a new, different page title. Just let them be wherever they are at and work on them at that page title. Every time you move a page, it creates a Redirect page and now you probably have more Redirect pages in your User space than you do pages with actual content. All of these page moves are unnecessary. Just consider where you want a page and move it ONCE, not multiple times.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that I've already left a message about your page moves at User talk:Vestrian24Bio#Page moves. I guess it had no effect on your behavior. Please do not do more unnecessary page moves or it could become disruptive editing. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that. I haven't moved pages since your last message.

It was just until recent when I noticed a misspelt page in my User namespace; which led to the moves of it and it's subpages.

Again, I'm sorry about this. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 11:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edit (executing an edit request) to List of highest-grossing Tamil films and cited Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES. However, I cannot find any mention of the New Indian Express, which is the site that I referenced, on that page. Could you please elaborate further? Thanks. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 14:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Not all the Indian websites are reliable; Some are unreliable as they are fan based or written to get public attention. As per WP:RELIABLESOURCES.
• To make it easier The Indian Cinema Task Force has created a list of reliable sources–WP:ICTFSOURCES.
• This list includes the Indian websites which can be trusted enough; while other websites could contain fake news.
  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Per WP:ICTFSOURCES, The Indian Express is reliable and trustworthy.
• But since the group's split in 1999, the southern edition named The New Indian Express is not considered reliable.
  𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay, thanks. I wasn’t aware that the list was intended as an exclusive allowlist Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 18:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  You're Welcome. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 09:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tata WPL Logo.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2024 Women's Premier League Points table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2023 Big Matches has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Matches fail WP:GNG and we are not an indiscriminate collection of Sri Lankan school matches, with this page violating WP:NOTSTATS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After an appeal on my talk page, I've reopened and relisted the FFD File:Tata WPL Logo.webp. Please continue any discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 March 8. Thanks. -- Whpq (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vestrian24Bio

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Rusalkii and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect 2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) Squads, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 9 § 2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) Squads.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Rusalkii)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusalkii (talk) 08:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tata IPL Logo.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) squads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Features of Ben 10. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. dxneo (talk) 03:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TATA IPL Auction 2024 Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) squads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) squads until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 15:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 64th Battle of the Babes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/64th Battle of the Babes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AA (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TATA IPL 2022 Logo.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]