Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.

Carmen Miranda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 20:25:57 (UTC)

Reason

A good quality 1940s picture. Previous nomination ended on 4-0.

Articles in which this image appears

Carmen Miranda

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Author unknown (20th Century Fox)

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Last nomination, for those who missed it, was dedicated to sorting out a couple issues. Now that they're dealt with, nothing blocks this image from promotion in my opinion. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 23:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per previous nom.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – per previous nom. Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Janke | Talk 19:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Carmen Miranda in That Night in Rio (1941).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl with the Wine Glass

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 20:34:08 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and resolution. This is a featured picture on the Persian language Wikipedia

Articles in which this image appears

The Wine Glass, Red, History of red, List of paintings by Johannes Vermeer

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Johannes Vermeer

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - This is very much not a Yorck scan, and thus the source provided is invalid (see discussion at Commons). I've reverted to the Yorck version.

As for the digitization, it's honestly quite good and worth supporting. It just needs to be uploaded separately, with a clear and accurate source.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - Would consider supporting hi-res version if source & other problems fixed. --Janke | Talk 19:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  File:Johannes Vermeer - The Girl with the Wine Glass.jpg is from the museum site, File:Johannes Vermeer - The Girl with the Wine Glass - Google Art Project.jpg from Google Art Project. Those are originals, if you want to tweak levels, please remember to do so as a new upload. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 22:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a rough choice. The Google Art Project version has fantastic resolution, but seems a little dark. The Museum version shows up a bit better at thumbnail, but is only... like 1/16th the size. Either way, they're both better than the Yorck scan. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm kinda tempted to use Huginn to 'colour match Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

William Rankine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 02:20:24 (UTC)

Reason

After seeing how good of quality Annan's picture of Livingstone was, I looked to see what else he had. Rather a lot, actually, a lot of it connected with Edinburgh and Glasgow. So, William Rankine. He developed the Rankine temperature scale, which is... well, to use a formulation I had to learn way back when I was in American high school and studying for the SATs before I moved over here: Kelvin is to Celsius as Rankine is to Fahrenheit.

Did a lot of work on thermodynamics.

Articles in which this image appears

William Rankine + 2

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

Thomas Annan, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 02:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 18:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ©Geni (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:William John Macquorn Rankine by Thomas Annan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Prokofiev (two)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 12:43:39 (UTC)

Reason

Back again with a more high quality image. Thanks for the guidance, Chris.

Articles in which this image appears

Sergei Prokofiev, his symphonies 1 and 2, War and Peace (opera), Music of the Soviet Union

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Bain News Service, uploaded by me

• Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 12:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• support, nice photo. Artem.G (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Interesting. It would be good to know where this was taken; the file description doesn't say. -- Sca (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google Arts says that "Sergei Prokofiev arrived on Angel Island on August 21, 1918. This image was taken in New York after he was admitted into the country by immigration officials." (that's about another photo from that series). Artem.G (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. New York should be added to whatever may eventually appear as the POTD copy block. Quite a dapper guy for a Soviet luminary. -- Sca (talk) 12:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added the location to the desc. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Good job. Choliamb (talk) 19:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 18:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419 Crop 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:29, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brenthis ino

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2023 at 12:32:57 (UTC)

Reason

High quality focus-stack showing the distinguishing markings of this species. Currently nominated at Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Brenthis ino

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator –  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I thought we didn't promote lead images of stub articles. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Unless there's been a change that I'm not aware of (entirely possible, given the time I spent away from Wikipedia), article quality is not a criterion for promotion. Featuring on the Main Page is a separate issue, and even then back when I was coordinating I'd usually let something of this length through.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd mostly agree: Proper stubs are a bit of a problem as they could easily end up merged or deleted, but this article isn't so short as to be a problem. This is more Start-class. There's a minimum standard, but this reaches it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 01:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It's not officially a criterion for promotion here at FPC, but for those choosing POTDs on the Main Page it usually is. However, there's probably enough in the 'Description' section of Brenthis ino for a POTD copy block. -- Sca (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: Creator corrected, it is not me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. I must have been looking at the church image by mistake.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Impressively sharp.©Geni (talk) 16:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Brenthis ino - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snowflake

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2023 at 18:56:55 (UTC)

Reason

Quality macro photo of a natural snowflake. Good lead image, FP on Commons. On a sidenote: the photographer's userpage [1] says his snowflake images have been published (or used) in notable websites.

Articles in which this image appears

Snowflake

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather

Creator

Alexey Kljatov

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Love it! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Snowflake macro photography 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poplar hawk-moth - Laothoe populi (2)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2023 at 11:29:40 (UTC)

Reason

Renomination after previous nomination failed 4-0.

Articles in which this image appears

Poplar hawk-moth

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Thanks for the renomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 18:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Poplar hawk-moth (Laothoe populi populi) male.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica filiformis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2023 at 11:33:16 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Veronica filiformis

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

Reinhold Möller

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Would support if put in infobox. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't think size of 4mm is correct Reinhold Möller according to Wikipedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Is 10mm more realistic? Charlesjsharp .--Ermell (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I've no idea, I just saw that the numbers were inconsistent. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - I'm happy with the current location myself, as the infobox image also shows the plant's distinctive leaves (it could be done better, but...). No comment on size estimates.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Reinhold Möller, if you have a good estimate of how far the camera was from the flower? then we can calculate the diameter of the flower. Bammesk (talk) 03:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: This question is harder for me to answer than the question of size. There is a photo with a superimposed lineal and that comes is correct in my opinion.

  Ermell (talk) 09:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermell: you didn't address Charles' concern. Is "size ca 4mm" correct? If yes, then good. If no or unsure, then the file description [2] should be modified. Bammesk (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done@Bammesk: Thanks for the hint.--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Ivar (talk) 15:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Faden-Ehrenpreis (Veronica filiformis)-20230419-RM-125228.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hamerkop/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2023 at 14:11:21 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons. In original nomination received 4 support votes, no opposes.

Articles in which this image appears

Hamerkop

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 18:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support 〜 Festucalex • talk 18:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hamerkop (Scopus umbretta umbretta) 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small red damselfly/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2023 at 14:17:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons. Received 4 support votes, no opposes, in previous nomination.

Articles in which this image appears

Small red damselfly

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 18:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 14:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Small red damselfly (Ceriagrion tenellum) male Crockford Stream.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Green frog

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2023 at 14:24:50 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Hybridogenesis in water frogs, Edible frog

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 18:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support 〜 Festucalex • talk 18:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. The discussion of hybridogenesis (and the related article klepton) were new to me and unexpectedly interesting. (As an aside, of the many common names for this frog, I much prefer "Edible frog", both because it's a direct translation of the original Linnaean binomial Rana esculenta, and because it avoids confusion with the very common Green frog of eastern North America, which is an entirely different critter.) Choliamb (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - What is the shade on top Charlesjsharp ? DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not sure what you mean by shade on top. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Green frog (Pelophylax esculentus complex) Danube delta.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surgery

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2023 at 17:17:27 (UTC)

Reason

High quality, dynamic image. Featured on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Surgery

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others

Creator

Sklifosovsky Insitute

• Support as nominator –  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Where's the EV? This just shows some persons in masks, not the surgery itself... --Janke | Talk 17:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The work is being done in the centre-bottom of the image. Barring a patient giving a release, there is little chance of getting much showing the patient (indeed, most items on Commons don't show much of the patient) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah, I agree with @Janke, compare to something like The Gross Clinic for a defining image (albeit a painting) of surgery. Patient releases are entirely possible or non-identifying pictures. Jahaza (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment A posed marketing shot I believe with little EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. Could be anywhere anytime, and tells us nothing about the surgery. -- Sca (talk) 12:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – In an article about surgery, it shows a surgeon performing surgery. That's enough IMO. The article isn't about a specific type of surgery where seeing an incision is helpful. Bammesk (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Beatnik of 1959 contestants

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2023 at 07:06:56 (UTC)

Reason

Great quality, especially the faces of the four ladies in the front & the man with the cigarette. The artwork in the background gives it a surreal quality. By far the highest quality image in regards to Beatnik culture I can find anywhere on Wikipedia or Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Beatnik, Hippie

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle

Creator

Author unknown (Los Angeles Times Photographic Collection)

• Support as nominator – Michael0986 (talk) 07:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Messy composition / person cut off / right edge of image visible / not in prominent position in articles / thus low EV. Not among Wiki's "best"... --Janke | Talk 14:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – This needs some restoration (the right edge, and some specks at full size). I support if the restoration is done. I am not bothered by the composition because it's a semi-historic photo. Bammesk (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I think the "messy" composition adds to its charm. I find it an incredible photo personally. Shame you guys aren't feeling it like I do. I think it's prominent in the "Hippie" article, easily the most interesting photo on that page.Michael0986 (talk) 07:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with you, but I'll wait for Adam's cleaned-up version. – Choliamb (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Not doing well on Commons. It is a good idea to submit to FP on Commons before here (for most images) Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Not particularly, hah. I would appreciate it if someone would do a restoration for it. It has so much going on, I love the mystery of it. Michael0986 (talk) 02:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'll restore it Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 13:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Much appreciated Adam. Michael0986 (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• This can be renominated after Adam does the restoration. Bammesk (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Les Métamorphoses du jour, p. LII

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2023 at 23:33:27 (UTC)

Reason

Admittedly, this is one of many illustrations in Jean Ignace Isidore Gérard Grandville, and we could probably reasonably argue for any of them, or a set. But I think we should have at least one of Granville's illustrations featured. Perhaps I should expand this to a set of images.

Articles in which this image appears

Jean Ignace Isidore Gérard Grandville

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Literary illustrations

Creator

Jean Ignace Isidore Gérard Grandville

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 23:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Not enough EV for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair. There's so many to choose from in his article I'm not sure it's possible not to make an arbitrary choice. He's one of those artists who's noted for a distinctive type of image more than any specific one in that type, so all the ones not in galleries are the outliers, and the stuff people associate with him is in galleries. Weird situation. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 22:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Vinícius O. (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Puzzling. – Sca (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Les Métamorphoses du jour p. LII - Restoration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IceCube Neutrino Observatory

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2023 at 02:37:00 (UTC)

Reason

Quality lead image of IceCube Neutrino Observatory. The observatory is located less than a mile from the exact South Pole. It has been operational since 2010. The observatory detects cosmic neutrinos using an array of 5,160 under ice sensors. Its aim is to produce a map of cosmic neutrino emissions, primarily of the northern hemisphere. A similar future observatory, the KM3NeT, is planned for detecting neutrinos of the southern hemisphere.

Articles in which this image appears

IceCube Neutrino Observatory

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding

Creator

Christopher Michel

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Great EV, but I think there are some blownout highlights—the right edges of the cylindrical towers and some patches of snow being an example. 〜 Festucalex • talk 04:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm inclined to think that a building with white parts in perma-snow in sunlight is going to necessarily on the bright side. Given dawn/dusk comes for, at best, a few days a year, and given the extremely-difficult-to-reach geographic location, Support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 15:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Not really blown, the values are 240-255. In fact, very few pixels are 255. High EV, and prominently in the news just recently. --Janke | Talk 17:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Seems like there is some perspective distortion. MER-C 09:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It's small, not a disqualifier IMO, not worth reprocessing the image. Bammesk (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per Janke and Adam – Choliamb (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:IceCube Neutrino Observatory in 2023 02.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Circumpolar trails and sunset at the La Hague lighthouse, Normandy, France

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2023 at 04:02:03 (UTC)

Reason

Very high quality image and the only FP on Commoms related to the La Hague lighthouse and circumpolar light trails. Also a finalist for Picture of The Year 2017 on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Star trails

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others

Creator

Antoine Lamielle

• Support as nominator – Aviafanboi (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The lighthouse is definitely out of focus, and the whole thing has a strange watercolor blur thing going on. 〜 Festucalex • talk 04:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Not as valuable as infobox image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - star trails are dotted due to intervals between exposures. Oh, I remember the days when you could expose several hours on film... --Janke | Talk 17:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I prefer and will support the lead image of the article if it's nominated. That image can also be added as lead image in the Diurnal motion article. Bammesk (talk) 18:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Even that one looks pretty weird in full size, the trails are all chopped up... Looks like it is upscaled from a smaller original (I checked the tiff file on the ESO site, it's the same). --Janke | Talk 20:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The dotting is part of digital photography. It [3] isn't upscaled, the landscape ambient light (moon/sun/etc.) changes over 6 hours of exposure (judging by star trails), so the result is smooth, averaged, silky looking. It's not a defect. Bammesk (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC) . . . . This image, if nominated, needs editing though. There are some dots (may be dead pixels) in the top middle area. Bammesk (talk) 02:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Narmer Palette

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2023 at 18:52:56 (UTC)

Reason

High quality, good resolution, and transparency of the picture

Articles in which this image appears

Narmer Palette, Cosmetic palette, Art of ancient Egypt, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture

Creator

unknown author

• Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - insufficient physical resolution. MER-C 09:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Also the color seems to be missing, compare to this image. Bammesk (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michelangelo's David

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2023 at 21:04:55 (UTC)

Reason

High-resolution image and good quality. FP on the Spanish Wikipedia. It is considered a Quality image on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

David (Michelangelo), Masculine beauty ideal

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture

Creator

Commonists

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I don't wish to promote an image from a banned user. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support It's a great photo Isthistwisted (talk) 04:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, great photo. The photo stays good even if the author was banned. Artem.G (talk) 18:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – I agree with Charles, but this is a high quality photo, and good lead image for its article. Bammesk (talk) 01:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Per Artem.G and Bammesk, and just to spite a certain Florida school board...  ;-) [[4]] --Janke | Talk 08:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Charlesjsharp and since it appears to be possible to get DSLR P(and equiv mirrorless) cameras in there and the statue isn't going anywhere it seems likely we will get another such image along before too long.©Geni (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Charles and Geni – Choliamb (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Charles and Geni. MER-C 19:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palácio do Planalto

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2023 at 21:27:00 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Wikimedia Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Palácio do Planalto

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Jonas Richter

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Infobox image has more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Reluctant oppose Decent image, but its use in the article is negligable. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I agree with Adam. The image is buried in a gallery at the end of the article, and it doesn't show the whole or a big portion of the building as do some of the other images in the article. Bammesk (talk) 01:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sentinel Satellite photo of Cyprus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 05:08:06 (UTC)

Reason

Extremely high-resolution photo of island of such quality, you can even make out the roads, buildings, and the like... all in an area encompassing four different geopolitical zones: three countries (Cyprus, Northern Cyprus, and the United Kingdom) and the UN buffer zone.

Articles in which this image appears

Cyprus, Geography of Cyprus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps

Creator

PalauanLibertarian

• Support as nominator – - Knightoftheswords (Talk · Contribs) 05:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Watermarked, often a reason for opposing... Easy to remove, though. --Janke | Talk 07:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment It's too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. -- Sca (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Euthrix potatoria caterpillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 09:55:16 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Euthrix potatoria

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 09:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. The side view by Ivar is also excellent. – Choliamb (talk) 12:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support 〜 Festucalex • talk 12:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Euthrix potatoria caterpillar (top view) - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Drill Platoon, U.S. Marine Corp

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 11:48:14 (UTC)

Reason

stunning photo, FP on commons

Articles in which this image appears

United States Marine Corps Silent Drill Platoon, Aviation photography

FP category for this image

Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air

Creator

Staff Sgt. Oscar L. Olive IV, U.S. Marine Corps

• Support as nominator – Aviafanboi (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Promotional posed image that adds little EV to either article. Crop lower right too tight too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Per Charles. Obviously posed for promo pitch. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• About the oppose rationales above: This is a ceremonial, show platoon [5], so posing and promoting is built into what they do and part of the EV. Bammesk (talk) 13:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  How does it inform the reader/viewer about the aircraft or the Marine Corps? Boring, IMO. -- Sca (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• If that's your oppose rationale, then put it next to your vote! Bammesk (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. Given the uses, it's clearly being used to show off these platoons that exist for show. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:35, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose weird, distracting composition. Insufficient EV as well to justify FP. (t · c) buidhe 02:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hyacinth macaw in flight

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 12:02:56 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons. IUCN listed as Vulnerable. Tis image been used on a Postage Stamp from India (without permission!).

Articles in which this image appears

Hyacinth macaw

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Perplexed question India? Why??? It's not as if there's a shortage of photogenic birds in India. Why did they need to poach a photo of a New World species for their postage stamp? – Choliamb (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It is very normal for postal authorities to issue sets of images of non-native animals. They cater to 'topical' (US) or 'thematic' (UK) stamp collectors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• About your comment in the reason section above: The license you release your photos under on Commons doesn't require "permission". It requires "attribution". Bammesk (talk) 12:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• They didn't ask permission which is not required but is usual. They did not attribute the photo as required by the licence and declined to answer a stream of e-mails. Reprehensible behaviour by India Post. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)

• Ok understood. I am just pointing out that claiming "permission", or lack of, doesn't help or change anything. It just confuses the issue. Bammesk (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I experienced a similar situation a few years ago: North Korea took my Wiki photo of the Bengtskär lighthouse and put it on a stamp (no permission, no attribution whatsoever) - and added Albatross birds! (Those are half a globe away, never seen in Finland...) The result is here: [6] That's my family and friends (in sepia) standing under the left-hand stamp... --Janke | Talk 20:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  At least they didn't add hyacinth macaws. Choliamb (talk) 21:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps we should form a club! Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That is not fair. The authorship must be appreciated when the artistic work is used. Being an Indian, I should say sorry to you for the act. As a lawyer I can take it up the issue before the appropriate authority if you insist Charlesjsharp. Let the authority give an explanation. DreamSparrow ^Chat 17:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That's a kind offer, but I wouldn't want to put you to any trouble. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• What do you mean by trouble ? I don't find any trouble in informing an illegal act to an authority which is committed the said act Charlesjsharp. If you do not wish to proceed, leave it. Otherwise, not an issue for me. Government department is not above the LAW. Let them at least come and apologise for this. DreamSparrow ^Chat 13:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mydreamsparrow:, the copyright license here says "Attribution .... you may do so in any reasonable manner". Is it reasonable to expect attribution "on the face of a stamp" itself? Such as the name of a photographer, or a URL link, or etc., on the face of a stamp? If no, then is it reasonable that attribution could be (or perhaps was) given in a public log or public listing of some sorts? Bammesk (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: The answer is here. Right, even I do think it will not be possible to put the name of the photographer on the face of the stamp. However, they can add the credit here right ? DreamSparrow ^Chat 09:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in Sweden, artists get credit on the stamps, for instance see [[7]] ... --Janke | Talk 16:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mydreamsparrow, yes that makes sense, thanks for the explanation. Bammesk (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This'd look great on the main page, or other things, like a stamp. The Indian Postal Service has voted. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hyacinth macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) in flight.JPG --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guttural toad

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 11:44:12 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Guttural toad

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Astonishingly, not one of the many other photos of this species in the Commons shows the red patches on the thighs, which are mentioned in the article. – Choliamb (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:African common toad (Amietophrynus gutturalis) swimming.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

African helmeted turtle/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 11:32:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Renominated. Received 4 support votes; no opposes. This is a ‘behaviour’ image showing how the turtle withdraws its feet when threatened (in this case by our vehicle as it was in the middle of the road). Also shows head clearly.

Articles in which this image appears

African helmeted turtle

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:African helmeted turtle (Pelomedusa subrufa).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danafungia scruposa

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 10:00:14 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Danafungia scruposa

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support 〜 Festucalex • talk 12:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Coral plato (Danafungia scruposa), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-15, DD 49.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

USS Commodore Perry

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 10:41:53 (UTC)

Reason

Nice photograph of an American Civil War vessel by a notable photographer.

Articles in which this image appears

USS Commodore Perry +1

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water

Creator

Timothy H. O'Sullivan restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 10:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Shame about the tilt, but you shouldn't correct it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Choliamb (talk) 12:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Only moderately interesting photographically. Cleaned up the 800-word target article a bit. – Sca (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It's by a major photographer, and from an era where outdoor photography like this was much more difficult. I dunno. I think it's, at the least, encyclopedic. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 18:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support The quality of the picture, overall, especially considering its date, seems excellent. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – top border has a white streak (just a pixel wide, see right side), visible at high magnification (800%). Bammesk (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Fixed! Thanks for pointing it out! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 00:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Good quality photo of a type of ship that was likely rarely photographed (especially with the photos surviving) Nick-D (talk) 10:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Commodore Perry, Pamunkey River MET DP70753.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stuben am Arlberg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2023 at 19:11:16 (UTC)

Reason

Nice composition, good EV, good quality, FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Stuben am Arlberg

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

Heimfoto

• Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 19:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support 〜 Festucalex • talk 12:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Klösterle Stuben Vogelperspektive.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Cleveland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2023 at 02:32:17 (UTC)

Reason

There's definite grain, but it's also a pretty high-resolution scan of a fairly small print. Worked with the FA-nominator to give an excellent new featured article the picture it deserved. I do like having a good picture at the start of a featured article, don't you?

Restoration notes at file description page. If you see any issues, flag them up, I'll deal with them tomorrow. Biggest thing that might need noted is that I squared off the arched top of the image. This is because the National Portrait Gallery has a habit of cropping off the edges of cabinet cards, so it kinda needed to be cropped, and there's no background to speak of. I've noted one example of an image that exists in both forms on the file description page; there's tons of similar examples.

Articles in which this image appears

Frances Cleveland

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political; you could argue for a few other categories, but I think this is where someone would look first.

Creator

Charles Milton Bell, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 02:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – very nice restoration, but since you asked, maybe a small patch or two on the upper right border, and a patch on the background adjacent to her right ear? "Having a good picture at the start of a featured article"? Of course not, that's blasphemous :-) Bammesk (talk) 02:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Should be fixed. Well, not the blasphemous part. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 12:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 16:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Frances Folsom Cleveland, by Charles Milton Bell.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tablet V of the Epic of Gilgamesh

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2023 at 16:52:26 (UTC)

Reason

The picture has good enough quality and transparency.

Articles in which this image appears

Epic of Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture

Creator

Neuroforever

• Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The image with the highest EV should be in infobox and that should normally be the FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd disagree and say that the image nominated for FP must be uniquely valuable in some way to the article. Being the lead image is common, but we want, ideally, all the images in the article to be good. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 23:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – I agree with Adam, but it's noisy, especially the background noise stands out. I'll give it a try and denoise it. Bammesk (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Aye, needs a denoise, but the philosophy matters more than individual photographic issues. I've seen too many articles with terrible images throughout. We need to have strong motivations to improve them. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 11:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Done. I uploaded the denoised version on top of the earlier version, I don't think the modification is controversial. Bammesk (talk) 01:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Certainly better, some odd artefacts, though, especially on the left edge. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 02:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you're referring to? Is it the blotchy background? I can smooth out the background. FYI, I didn't add, clone or modify anything. I just blurred the background, and very slightly the tablet. Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Black shadow, left hand side, two thirds down. Similar elsewhere. Very jagged Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.4% of all FPs.} 23:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Done, cleaner version uploaded. Hope that works. Bammesk (talk) 17:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It at least now looks good at minimum FPC size. Given it's a recent discovery, I'm inclined to promote until we have a better copy. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 17:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, I don't really see what you see; and at full size, not just the minimum FP size. I see rough-cut edges of the tablet (on left and right) that fall outside the camera's depth of field and therefore are hazy. That's not unusual. And the noise is now reasonable, so the EV carries the image IMO. Bammesk (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I support anyway. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 19:10, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific kingfisher

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2023 at 18:19:29 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Pacific kingfisher

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

JJ Harrison

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:19, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – --Janke | Talk 12:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Is there any chance of identifying the grasshopper? (Perhaps to the family level, as I realise species might be a big ask?) Josh Milburn (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It could be Conocephalus sp., but I don't have high confidence (and incidentally didn't write the 'grasshopper' caption). JJ Harrison (talk)

Promoted File:Pacific Kingfisher.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hsue-shen Tsien with his family onboard SS President Cleveland

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 06:12:06 (UTC)

Reason

good quality, good EV. It's a photo of Hsue-shen Tsien, who was suspected to be a communist in 1950, was under house arrest for 5 years, and then was deported to China. In the US he was a PhD student and a colleague of Theodore von Karman, and is often mentioned as one of the founders of the Jet Propulsion Lab. In China he became a father of satellite and missile programs, and eventually of the whole Chinese space program. This photo was made on a ship when he and his family was deported in exchange for American soldiers captured during the Korean war.

Articles in which this image appears

Qian Xuesen, Jiang Ying (musician), Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

Los Angeles Times

• Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 06:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Doesn't add much EV to the mentioned articles. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I think its big problem is it's an (undocumented) crop of the original image which removes a lot of the context that makes it valuable for this use. I'll have a go at this. Miss Beatnik I guess isn't on a timescale anymore. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 13:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Adam Cuerden, thanks for the comment, I was unaware that this is a crop, will be more meticulous in the future. Here is full photo from source File:Hsue-shen Tsien with his family onboard SS President Cleveland (full).jpg, would be great if you'll get a better crop. Artem.G (talk) 13:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Conditional support, if the the documentation of the original is sorted out, also it needs restoration. Bammesk (talk) 17:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kastellet, Stockholm

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 07:24:28 (UTC)

Reason

Good enough quality and transparency

Articles in which this image appears

Kastellet, Stockholm, Stockholm

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Julian Herzog

• Support as nominator — Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A featured picture on "Wikimedia Commons". — Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Nice comp, but what are those spots in the sky – precip? – Sca (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's snow all over the picture. Distracts considerably, IMO. --Janke | Talk 12:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, the weather is snowy. — Hamid Hassani (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The snow may be intentional but not good for an encyclopaedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crescentia Bourgin

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 07:46:18 (UTC)

Reason

Good enough quality

Articles in which this image appears

Louis of Oettingen-Wallerstein, Joseph Karl Stieler

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Unknown (painting by Joseph Karl Stieler (1781–1858), 1833)

• Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Source does not reflect the current version; it was for the original 765 × 1,000 file. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. I'd be more open to it if the image lead an article about the subject. Chris's comment also need to to be taken seriously. Josh Milburn (talk) 07:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:54, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue-tailed damselfies mating

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 21:00:46 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Previously nominated and withdrawn as it wasn't in the article.

Articles in which this image appears

Blue-tailed damselfly

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 17:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Blue-tailed damselfies (Ischnura elegans) mating female typica 4.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nettle tree butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 20:58:31 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Libythea celtis , Libythea , Libytheinae

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 17:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nettle tree (Libythea celtis) Bulgaria.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cattle tyrant/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2023 at 21:03:11 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image showing animal behaviour. FP on Commons. Received 3 support votes and no opposes on previous nomination.

Articles in which this image appears

Cattle tyrant, Capybara

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 16:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 16:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cattle tyrant (Machetornis rixosa) on Capybara.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mimetite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2023 at 17:05:03 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Mimetite

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 17:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – looks tasty! Bammesk (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Yummy cloudberry? Nah, lead and arsenic... :-( --Janke | Talk 13:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lead + arsenic = tap water [8]. Bammesk (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Mmm. Forbidden snack. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 22:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mimetite - Congreso-León mines, San Pedro Corralitos, Chihuahua, Mexico.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drosera capensis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2023 at 18:11:43 (UTC)

Reason

Quality video of the prey catching behavior of the Cape sundew carnivorous plant.

Articles in which this image appears

Drosera capensis

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others

Creator

Scott Schiller

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Could also be added to time lapse, better than most of the videos there, except for the astronomical one. (If that one would be re-uploaded from ESA in a larger, less compressed format and suitably edited, it would be a great FPC...) --Janke | Talk 08:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 14:20, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 04:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Drosera Capensis eating a fruit fly.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zygaena lonicerae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2023 at 18:38:14 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC two months ago, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Zygaena lonicerae

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:38, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I would like to support, but I feel the open-winged image (mine!) has equal or more EV. Should I nominate it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) 14:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, possibly as a replacement, possibly as an additional FP. Not sure. It's probably useful to identification to see both positions. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 04:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Like the red spots. – Sca (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Zygaena lonicerae - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wreck of the Edro III near Pegeia, Paphos, Cyprus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2023 at 13:02:03 (UTC)

Reason

good quality (Note: I know that the horizon isn't straight but correcting it will cause resolution change or a redo of the photo as mentioned on Commons ), FP on Commons, one of the best photos of the wreck

Articles in which this image appears

EDRO III

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water

Creator

Anton Zelenov

• Support as nominator – Aviafanboi (talk) 13:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Sketchy 200-word target article. – Sca (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd say it's probably significant enough. And, of course, might grow a bit more after a main paging. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 08:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – nice photo but weak article. The German article [9] has more on the ship's early years. Bammesk (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Edro III Shipwreck LE.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Sullivan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2023 at 21:59:07 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality and resolution

Articles in which this image appears

Kelly Sullivan, Kate Howard, 1978, Pink

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Eric Schneider

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 21:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Another pretty promotional portrait linked to thin 200-word target article. Scant EV. – Sca (talk) 12:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  She seems significant, but between the long neck and oddly porcelain face, either this is photoshopped or she has really smooth features. I'd like to see other circa-2012 images of her before deciding. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 08:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – per Adam, the technical quality isn't there. (photoshop, f/20 aperture, or etc.) Bammesk (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose looks like photoshop to me. (t · c) buidhe 21:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palácio do Planalto

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2023 at 22:41:08 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality and high EV

Articles in which this image appears

Palácio do Planalto

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Pedro França (Federal Senate)

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 16:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saturnia pavonia caterpillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2023 at 18:09:11 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons last year.

Articles in which this image appears

Saturnia pavonia

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment : I think Ivar's side view of the same has more EV, showing feet etc. Here, it's just a colorful sausage... --Janke | Talk 18:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Much like Euthrix potatoria below. -- Sca (talk) 11:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree with this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxea fascicularis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2023 at 18:16:37 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Galaxea fascicularis

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 04:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 15:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Coral (Galaxea fascicularis), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-18, DD 128.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ATLAS particle detector

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2023 at 17:02:46 (UTC)

Reason

The hull of the ATLAS particle detector experiment at CERN being constructed in 2005. For an overview of the project see the lead section of the article. The experiments have been ongoing since 2008. The photo highlights the eight toroid magnets wrapped with orange bands. For a physical layout of the project see the lead image in the Detector systems section and its image caption.

Articles in which this image appears

ATLAS experiment

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Others

Creator

Maximilien Brice, CERN

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support because of high EV. Resolution about the best available at that time. --Janke | Talk 19:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I'm surprised they had a digital camera with this high resolution in 2005! Person for scale adds to EV.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Interestingly, the Nikon D1X internally upsampled the image from 2.7 to 5.8 Mpix, using the 10M+ photosites on the sensor... --Janke | Talk 06:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I removed the counterclockwise tilt of the original, and switched the nom to the straightened version. Pinging participants @Janke and Crisco 1492:. Bammesk (talk) 01:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Prefer the straightened version. --Janke | Talk 06:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm good with the straightened version — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Installing the ATLAS Calorimeter - edit1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kármán vortex street

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2023 at 20:21:25 (UTC)

Reason

Good depiction of Kármán vortex street, a fluid dynamics phenomenon, in nature. This one is in the atmosphere and it was captured from space. The repetitive swirling pattern of clouds is caused by the interaction of wind blowing past (lower left corner) high altitude mountains of Juan Fernández Islands off the coast of Chile, specifically the Alejandro Selkirk Island [10] with a peak elevation of 4160 ft. This is a relatively old photo (1999) but the quality is sufficient and this isn't a commonly photographed subject in nature (not laboratory). FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Kármán vortex street, Juan Fernández Islands

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others

Creator

Robert Cahalan, NASA/GSFC

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to reader/viewer. – Sca (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • But that's what our Wiki articles are for! If I see an interesting POTD image, I always go to the article... Support. --Janke | Talk 08:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. Intriguing, draws attention to an interesting natural phenomenon.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• support Artem.G (talk) 12:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vortex-street-1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hemiolaus cobaltina

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2023 at 20:33:12 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image of very rare butterfly. FP on Commons. Stub articles, but this image has high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Hemiolaus cobaltina; Hemiolaus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Wow (talk) 11:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hemiolaus cobaltina.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madagascar black-eye

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2023 at 20:39:12 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image of rarely seen butterfly. FP on Commons. Stub articles, but this image has high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Leptomyrina phidias; Leptomyrina

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Wow (talk) 11:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 02:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Madagascar black-eye (Leptomyrina phidias).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scalloped yellow glider female

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2023 at 20:57:39 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Cymothoe (butterfly); Cymothoe fumana

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Wow (talk) 11:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Scalloped yellow glider (Cymothoe fumana fumana) female.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ornate wrasse

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2023 at 01:37:58 (UTC)

Reason

Quality lead image of this fish. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Ornate wrasse

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Unfortunately, background is too similar to some of the coloring of the fish... --Janke | Talk 14:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Balfour

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2023 at 13:29:33 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image with good EV

Articles in which this image appears

Arthur Balfour, 1906 United Kingdom general election, December 1910 United Kingdom general election, January 1910 United Kingdom general election

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Photographed by George Charles Beresford, uploaded by c:User:Neveselbert (mobile), restored by User:MyCatIsAChonk

• Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Wow (talk) 11:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.5% of all FPs.} 02:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I don't see what makes this image "above and beyond". It's a picture of Balfour but I don't see how it has much more EV than any other decent quality picture of him. Visually, the crop is too close IMO. (t · c) buidhe 03:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Buidhe, I chose to restore this photo of Balfour partly because it was already present on his Wikidata profile, but also because it's (imo) the best photo we have of him. The other possible one would be File:A.J. Balfour LCCN2014682753 (cropped).jpg, but the photograph itself is more blurry and he's not looking into the camera. As for the crop, it was directly pulled from National Portrait Gallery website, so I'm assuming the only other content of the photo is a border. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Voted for this just in time Aviafanboi (talk) 13:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Arthur-James-Balfour-1st-Earl-of-Balfour.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J. Robert Oppenheimer

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2023 at 21:21:03 (UTC)

Reason

Restored in lieu of the film released today; best image of Oppenheimer we have, high EV

Articles in which this image appears

J. Robert Oppenheimer, Oppenheimer (film), History of nuclear weapons, Barbenheimer, Los Alamos, New Mexico

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering

Creator

Photographer unknown, cropped by User:Artem.G, restored by User:MyCatIsAChonk

• Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 21:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support due to high EV and use in many articles - however, it would benefit from a slight local lightening of the IMO too dark face. --Janke | Talk 08:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC) PS: Saw the world premiere yesterday, in Finland's southernmost movie theater [11]...[reply]

  @Janke, attempted to lighten the face a bit but I'm unsure of my success... what do you think? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Thoughts on the film? I'm seeing it Tuesday, theatres around me were completely sold out... should've been more prepared![reply]

  Much better now! It's definitely a watchable film - didn't feel like 3 hours at all! It is more about the morality and politics, than the technical aspects of his work. --Janke | Talk 14:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @MyCatIsAChonk: there is a halo, a light patch on the background next to his chin. It wasn't there previously. Bammesk (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Bammesk, just attempted to fix it- thoughts? Thanks for noticing the issue! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's good, thanks. Bammesk (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 13:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• support, Artem.G (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 09:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Aviafanboi (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Oppenheimer (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]