< July 19
July 21 >

July 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 20, 2023.

SearXNG

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 3#SearXNG

The Little Mermaid (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Pageviews justify keeping for now. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UFILM. Target released 2 months ago; "upcoming" no longer applies. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2525, 3535, 4545, 6565, 7510, 8510, 9595

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27#2525, 3535, 4545, 6565, 7510, 8510, 9595

Bard(chatbot)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects without a space between the search term and the disambiguator are typically not useful. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Better by Design

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27#Better by Design

Template:Use

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is further support for the creation of a generic template at this title, which is outside the scope of the edits I'm taking on by closing this at RfD signed, Rosguill talk 22:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is far too broad a title to redirect to any single target (e.g. template:Use British English, template:Use mdy dates, etc). Additionally, the templates that begin Use add hidden notices to articles for editors and bots, the template's target is intended for use on talk pages although it was in use at Sunan Kalijaga (an article about an Indonesian that was also marked to use DMY dates but which has no dates more precise than the year and no immediately obvious tie to either US or British English words or spelling). At Talk:Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic#Renewed discussion regarding variant John Maynard Friedman mentioned it in a comment last month in a manner that suggests they were using it in a generic manner. Thryduulf (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Law & Order: New York

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9#Law & Order: New York

Wikipedia:CONTEST

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1#Wikipedia:CONTEST

Grace Warrior

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. But, it was actually harder to determine that than you might think from the perfectly 50/50 headcount. Worth noting that even though it wasn't technically bundled, I'm including Grace Warrior Irwin Powell in this, too - anyone is free to WP:BRD or start a new discussion regarding that, if they think it's meaningfully different from Grace Warrior. (non-admin closure) casualdejekyll 18:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Amending to no consensus, retarget to Crikey! It's the Irwins, with thanks to User:Tavix. casualdejekyll 18:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not sure we need a redirect to someone's non-notable child who isn't even discussed in the article. --woodensuperman 08:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further opinions on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lynyrd scotland

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as it appears to have started as a hoax stub article, created as part of a vandalism spree by Hunterhunter. I'm perhaps being overly cautious in not just nominating it for speedy deletion. Nurg (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sándor Bôkônyi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a Hungarian biography, but this Hungarian spelling for his name is made-up. Ô is not even in the Hungarian alphabet. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Password game

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget the first to Password (disambiguation), keep the second as is. ✗plicit 08:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For password game: it seems that the original creator of the overwritten article (Quadell) and the original creator of the redirect (JB82) intended it to be for the home version of the game (see Password (American game show) § Home games). However, we now have The Password Game (created by ObserveOwl). Curious to see what community consensus is on this redirect – I don't think that the current target is very appropriate, and at the very least should be made more specific to the section on home games. Alternatives include retargeting to The Password Game or to Password (disambiguation), which is where Password (game) points (most recent editor is BOZ). Sdrqaz (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Amara Maple

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name is not included in article, has apparently been removed after BLPN discussion, so redirect should be deleted. Seems to have been CSDd previously, so needs this venue. Also Amara maple PamD 06:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7 So add it back to the article, reliably sourced. Unless it is there, reliably sourced, the redirect should not exist - see the template note: "If this is the name of a living person, then one or more reliable sources must be included in the target article that will support the existence of this personal name, or else this redirect's talk page must be created and the reference(s) added there. PamD 07:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“or else this redirect's talk page must be created and the reference(s) added there”.
I will add it to the talk page. Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 Why not add it to the article? PamD 08:00, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why should I? RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To show the reader why they've reached the article. PamD 08:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This contradicts what the template you have just quoted states. That’s sufficient for the redirect to be kept. Regards and have a good day, RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RodRabelo7 was [notified] on 28th May, 2023 about the BLPN discussion by another user. Although the consensus was seemingly against them at the time, they stated the name should be included on 9 June, 2023 before [creating] their redirect. The history on the redirects pages shows a refusal to acknowledge BLP policy by ignoring the discussion, the policy, and re adding after removal. Also worth noting, the BLPN discussion has already clarified why the YouTube results are not a RS, as well as the Playboy article, and at this point it seems like a unwillingness to listen. And lastly - the original [adding] of the name was done by RodRabelo7 on 5 Feb, 2023 to the main article.

Awshort (talk) 10:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Soma Santoki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating this for deletion as the redirect points to the wrong article. Soma Santoki is a Japanese actor [7] who does star in The Boy and the Heron, but has also worked in other films. The destination article contains no prose discussing Santoki. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UncleKenneth/Kenneth turner

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect differs from most others of the same type in that the username appears to have some connection to its target subject. It's still an unlikely and redundant search term, and my Google searches for "UncleKenneth" turn up only unrelated people. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wishlist/MD (Ayurveda)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 12:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Wishlist/" was an error, given that the article was previously located at "User:Netha Hussain/Wishlist/MD (Ayurveda)" (see this index). While I think this redirect would make a borderline case for G6, it is an obvious RFD candidate. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

3eni/Rico Tscharntke

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect containing a username, about a person who isn't currently mentioned in the article, resulting from an erroneous page move that lasted for one minute. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Auric/Hyena (Malawi)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another unlikely redirect prefixed with an username. The article in question, Sexual cleansing (see its page history), was at this title for less than one minute. The redirect doesn't cross the threshold into being "speedyable" due to the length of the username, but I don't see how it can be useful in any way. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created when I moved my draft into mainspace. It was then moved to a more general title.--Auric talk 01:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

"Maypm" redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are two redirects created as a result of editor Maypm accidentally moving their drafts to the wrong title. They don't seem to be at all plausible, considering that the username has no connection to the buildings. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jilfi/Itzhak Druker

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like the RfDs above and below, this redirect is prefixed with the username of the article's creator, which makes it automatically implausible. The only reason I haven't speedied it yet is because the username is short, and as a result it is not prima facie "unambiguously created in error". Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ɱ/171-191 South High Street

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete (G7). — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible title because of the "Ɱ"; it was the result of an accidental move by Ɱ, the article's author, and was soon corrected two minuter later. At the same time, this title is not so egregious as to meet criterion G5 G6. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean G6? Also now meets G7, author requests deletion. ɱ (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ɱ: Oops, I have now corrected it (this was a pre-planned nomination). Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
More