Essays High‑impact | ||||||||||
|
This project page was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The following editors endorse the contents of this essay:
There should be a section for people that don't endorse this sophomoric illogical essay. Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with you based on association is pathetic behavior. 2.202.28.72 (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with youis not what this article does. --Hob Gadling (talk) 16:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This is not going anywhere productive, and off-topic to boot. Let it go, please. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
violent "solutions", normalizing these ideas are more than enough to cause real damage to people, and, for that reason, I don't think they should be allowed (something between welcome and unwelcome) here as long as they behave. Isabelle 🏳🌈 23:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
The following editors do not endorse the contents of this essay.
And they think the same way about youNo, no. They think the other guys' very existence is immoral and evil by definition, not their thinking. Big difference. A Nazi can stop being a Nazi and get accepted by anti-Nazis, but a Jew (for example) cannot stop being a Jew in a way that will get them accepted by Nazis. Potato, hand grenade. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
we all have our private definitions of symbols or statementsSure, and that's why we rely on the consensus of wikpedia editors (and outside scholars) to determine which symbols/statements would qualify. This is the English wikipedia, not the Russian, Turkish, or Israeli wikipedia. We draw the line at ideologies which seek to deprive others of rights, or systematically murder, rape, or enslave those who are different. Rainbow flags advocate no such thing, and as Isabelle has said, this argument is a false equivalency. It also reminds me of this billboard — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 16:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A good example of the correlation between white supremacist ideologies and disruptive editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 18:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
American Liberalism since the Trump era has become just as vengeful and warring as neo-Nazi or other genocidal groups.It's not personal offense, mind you. I'm not a liberal. But... Jesus. I'm not sure which interpretation of that comment is more alarming: "Liberals support genocide" or "Supporting genocide is no worse than cancelling people on Twitter [or whatever other scary thing liberals are doing]".This isn't a change in opinion. Just seeking to differentiate myself from those who make a mockery of the slaughter of my ancestors and my peers. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Just because someone has a different opinion than yours, doesn't make them Nazis. A Proud Alabamian (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
[2] Yes, those two beliefs are also stupid but not Nazi-specific. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Should Nazis also be blocked from reading Wikipedia? If e.g. reliable tips were made available (e.g. by anti-fascists) that a certain IP address belongs to a Nazi or Fascist organization or individual then that IP could be blocked from not only editing but also reading Wikipedia. Analogous to a bartender telling a Nazi to leave the establishment and not giving them any space in the world. Oompje (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
(they don't have the braincells to get educated in the first place or they would not be Nazis)Are you proud of this comment? Are you? 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 00:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Nazis may go dormant, sometimes for decades, but they always need to be monitored and excluded from regular life as much as possible.: the postwar history of Germany negates this.
@Cleter: This essay is not about what you believe or about what I believe. I agree that as long as nobody knows they're Nazis, nobody knows there is a problem, so there is nothing to do about them. But as soon as they make Nazi statements, many admins are willing to block them on the spot. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I firmly believe they can edit Wikipedia but not for ideology expression as it says. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I agree that as long as nobody knows they're Nazis, nobody knows there is a problem, so there is nothing to do about them.🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 23:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I apologize🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 23:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I firmly believe they can edit Wikipedia but not for ideology expression as it saysotherwise than meaning it is your own belief? But indeed, some admins think just like you but they won't wheel-war with the admins who think just like me. So, even if not all admins endorse this essay, the bottom line is that Nazis get blocked ASAP they make it known they are Nazis.