Relation between proper motion and velocity components of an object.
A year ago the object was d units of distance from the Sun, and its light moved in a year by angle μ radian/s. If there has been no distortion by gravitational lensing or otherwise then μ = where is the distance (usually expressed as annual velocity) transverse (tangential or perpendicular) to line of sight from the Sun. The angle is shaded light blue from the Sun to the object's start point and its year later position as if it had no radial velocity.
In this diagram the radial velocity happens to be one of the Sun and object parting, so is positive.

Proper motion is the astrometric measure of the observed changes in the apparent places of stars or other celestial objects in the sky, as seen from the center of mass of the Solar System, compared to the abstract background of the more distant stars.[1]

The components for proper motion in the equatorial coordinate system (of a given epoch, often J2000.0) are given in the direction of right ascension (μα) and of declination (μδ). Their combined value is computed as the total proper motion (μ).[2][3] It has dimensions of angle per time, typically arcseconds per year or milliarcseconds per year.

Knowledge of the proper motion, distance, and radial velocity allows calculations of an object's motion from the Solar System's frame of reference and its motion from the galactic frame of reference – that is motion in respect to the Sun, and by coordinate transformation, that in respect to the Milky Way.[4]


The celestial north and south poles are above/below CNP, CSP; the origin of all 24 hours of Right Ascension (the measure of absolute celestial east–west position), the March equinox (center of the sun's position then) at the J2000 epoch, is vector V.
In red the diagram adds the components of proper motion across the celestial sphere.
An ideal time to measure exactly such a small annual shift is at culmination. The culmination of the star is daily reached when the observer (and Earth) passes as shown by the blue arrows "beneath" the star.
The positive axes of the two components of its usually annually measured or published shift in proper motion are the exaggerated red arrows, note: the right arrows point to the east horizon. One red annotation is subtly shorter as the cosine of a star resting at 0° declination is 1, so such a star's east or west shift would not need to be multiplied by the cosine of its declination.
The proper motion vector is μ, α = right ascension, δ = declination, θ = position angle.

Over the course of centuries, stars appear to maintain nearly fixed positions with respect to each other, so that they form the same constellations over historical time. As examples, both Ursa Major in the northern sky and Crux in the southern sky, look nearly the same now as they did hundreds of years ago. However, precise long-term observations show that such constellations change shape, albeit very slowly, and that each star has an independent motion.

This motion is caused by the movement of the stars relative to the Sun and Solar System. The Sun travels in a nearly circular orbit (the solar circle) about the center of the galaxy at a speed of about 220 km/s at a radius of 8,000 parsecs (26,000 ly) from Sagittarius A*[5][6] which can be taken as the rate of rotation of the Milky Way itself at this radius.[7][8]

Any proper motion is a two-dimensional vector (as it excludes the component as to the direction of the line of sight) and it bears two quantities or characteristics: its position angle and its magnitude. The first is the direction of the proper motion on the celestial sphere (with 0 degrees meaning the motion is north, 90 degrees meaning the motion is east, (left on most sky maps and space telescope images) and so on), and the second is its magnitude, typically expressed in arcseconds per year (symbols: arcsec/yr, as/yr, ″/yr, ″ yr−1) or milliarcseconds per year (symbols: mas/yr, mas yr−1).

Proper motion may alternatively be defined by the angular changes per year in the star's right ascension (μα) and declination (μδ) with respect to a constant epoch.

The components of proper motion by convention are arrived at as follows. Suppose an object moves from coordinates (α1, δ1) to coordinates (α2, δ2) in a time Δt. The proper motions are given by:[9]

The magnitude of the proper motion μ is given by the Pythagorean theorem:[10]

technically abbreviated:

where δ is the declination. The factor in cos2δ accounts for the widening of the lines (hours) of right ascension away from the poles, cosδ, being zero for a hypothetical object fixed at a celestial pole in declination. Thus, a co-efficient is given to negate the misleadingly greater east or west velocity (angular change in α) in hours of Right Ascension the further it is towards the imaginary infinite poles, above and below the earth's axis of rotation, in the sky. The change μα, which must be multiplied by cosδ to become a component of the proper motion, is sometimes called the "proper motion in right ascension", and μδ the "proper motion in declination".[11]

If the proper motion in right ascension has been converted by cosδ, the result is designated μα*. For example, the proper motion results in right ascension in the Hipparcos Catalogue (HIP) have already been converted.[12] Hence, the individual proper motions in right ascension and declination are made equivalent for straightforward calculations of various other stellar motions.

The position angle θ is related to these components by:[2][13]

Motions in equatorial coordinates can be converted to motions in galactic coordinates.[14]


For most stars seen in the sky, the observed proper motions are small and unremarkable. Such stars are often either faint or are significantly distant, have changes of below 0.01″ per year, and do not appear to move appreciably over many millennia. A few do have significant motions, and are usually called high-proper motion stars. Motions can also be in almost seemingly random directions. Two or more stars, double stars or open star clusters, which are moving in similar directions, exhibit so-called shared or common proper motion (or cpm.), suggesting they may be gravitationally attached or share similar motion in space.

Barnard's Star, showing position every 5 years 1985–2005.

Barnard's Star has the largest proper motion of all stars, moving at 10.3″ yr−1. Large proper motion usually strongly indicates an object is close to the Sun. This is so for Barnard's Star, about 6 light-years away. After the Sun and the Alpha Centauri system, it is the nearest known star. Being a red dwarf with an apparent magnitude of 9.54, it is too faint to see without a telescope or powerful binoculars. Of the stars visible to the naked eye (conservatively limiting unaided visual magnitude to 6.0), 61 Cygni A (magnitude V=5.20) has the highest proper motion at 5.281″ yr−1, discounting Groombridge 1830 (magnitude V=6.42), proper motion: 7.058″ yr−1.[15]

A proper motion of 1 arcsec per year 1 light-year away corresponds to a relative transverse speed of 1.45 km/s. Barnard's Star's transverse speed is 90 km/s and its radial velocity is 111 km/s (perpendicular (at a right, 90° angle), which gives a true or "space" motion of 142 km/s. True or absolute motion is more difficult to measure than the proper motion, because the true transverse velocity involves the product of the proper motion times the distance. As shown by this formula, true velocity measurements depend on distance measurements, which are difficult in general.

In 1992 Rho Aquilae became the first star to have its Bayer designation invalidated by moving to a neighbouring constellation – it is now in Delphinus.[16]

Usefulness in astronomy

Stars with large proper motions tend to be nearby; most stars are far enough away that their proper motions are very small, on the order of a few thousandths of an arcsecond per year. It is possible to construct nearly complete samples of high proper motion stars by comparing photographic sky survey images taken many years apart. The Palomar Sky Survey is one source of such images. In the past, searches for high proper motion objects were undertaken using blink comparators to examine the images by eye. More modern techniques such as image differencing can scan digitized images, or comparisons to star catalogs obtained by satellites.[17] As any selection biases of these surveys are well understood and quantifiable, studies have confirmed more and inferred approximate quantities of unseen stars – revealing and confirming more by studying them further, regardless of brightness, for instance. Studies of this kind show most of the nearest stars are intrinsically faint and angularly small, such as red dwarfs.

Measurement of the proper motions of a large sample of stars in a distant stellar system, like a globular cluster, can be used to compute the cluster's total mass via the Leonard-Merritt mass estimator. Coupled with measurements of the stars' radial velocities, proper motions can be used to compute the distance to the cluster.

Stellar proper motions have been used to infer the presence of a super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way.[18] This black hole is suspected to be Sgr A*, with a mass of 4.2 × 106 M (solar masses).

Proper motions of the galaxies in the Local Group are discussed in detail in Röser.[19] In 2005, the first measurement was made of the proper motion of the Triangulum Galaxy M33, the third largest and only ordinary spiral galaxy in the Local Group, located 0.860 ± 0.028 Mpc beyond the Milky Way.[20] The motion of the Andromeda Galaxy was measured in 2012, and an Andromeda–Milky Way collision is predicted in about 4.5 billion years.[21] Proper motion of the NGC 4258 (M106) galaxy in the M106 group of galaxies was used in 1999 to find an accurate distance to this object.[22] Measurements were made of the radial motion of objects in that galaxy moving directly toward and away from Earth, and assuming this same motion to apply to objects with only a proper motion, the observed proper motion predicts a distance to the galaxy of 7.2±0.5 Mpc.[23]


Proper motion was suspected by early astronomers (according to Macrobius, c. AD 400) but a proof was not provided until 1718 by Edmund Halley, who noticed that Sirius, Arcturus and Aldebaran were over half a degree away from the positions charted by the ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus roughly 1850 years earlier.[24][25]

The lesser meaning of "proper" used is arguably dated English (but neither historic, nor obsolete when used as a postpositive, as in "the city proper") meaning "belonging to" or "own". "Improper motion" would refer to perceived motion that is nothing to do with an object's inherent course, such as due to Earth's axial precession, and minor deviations, nutations well within the 26,000-year cycle.

Stars with high proper motion

The following are the stars with highest proper motion from the Hipparcos catalog.[26] It does not include stars such as Teegarden's Star, which are too faint for that catalog. A more complete list of stellar objects can be made by doing a criterion query at the SIMBAD astronomical database.

Proper motion of 61 Cygni in one year intervals.
Highest proper motion stars[27]
# Star Proper motion Radial
(arc seconds)
Distance in parsecs
μα · cos δ
1 Barnard's Star −798.58 10328.12 −110.51 0.54831 1.82
2 Kapteyn's Star 6505.08 −5730.84 +245.19 0.25566 3.91
3 Groombridge 1830 4003.98 −5813.62 −98.35 0.10999 9.09
4 Lacaille 9352 6768.20 1327.52 +8.81 0.30526 3.28
5 Gliese 1 (CD −37 15492) (GJ 1) 5634.68 −2337.71 +25.38 0.23042 4.34
6 HIP 67593 2118.73[28] 5397.57[28] −4.4 0.18776 5.33
7 61 Cygni A & B 4133.05 3201.78 −65.74 0.286 3.50
8 Lalande 21185 −580.27 −4765.85 −84.69 0.39264 2.55
9 Epsilon Indi 3960.93 −2539.23 −40.00 0.27606 3.62

The figure for HIP 67593 is almost certainly an error, probably because the star has a relatively nearby brighter visual binary companion; the movement between the DSS2 and SDSS9 images is less than it. Gaia measured a much smaller proper motion for its Data Release 2, yet a 15-fold parallax between it and its likely common-proper-motion companion HIP 67594. Reconciling its distance and motion will have to wait for Data Release 3 expected to analyse well very high proper motion objects.

See also


  1. ^ Theo Koupelis; Karl F. Kuhn (2007). In Quest of the Universe. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 369. ISBN 978-0-7637-4387-1.
  2. ^ a b D. Scott Birney; Guillermo Gonzalez; David Oesper (2007). Observational Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-521-85370-5.
  3. ^ Simon F. Green; Mark H. Jones (2004). An Introduction to the Sun and Stars. Cambridge University Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-521-54622-5.
  4. ^ D. Scott Birney; Guillermo Gonzalez; David Oesper (2007). Observational Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-521-85370-5.
  5. ^ Horace A. Smith (2004). RR Lyrae Stars. Cambridge University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-521-54817-5.
  6. ^ M Reid; A Brunthaler; Xu Ye; et al. (2008). "Mapping the Milky Way and the Local Group". In F Combes; Keiichi Wada (eds.). Mapping the Galaxy and Nearby Galaxies. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-72767-7.
  7. ^ Y Sofu & V Rubin (2001). "Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 39: 137–174. arXiv:astro-ph/0010594. Bibcode:2001ARA&A..39..137S. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137. S2CID 11338838.
  8. ^ Abraham Loeb; Mark J. Reid; Andreas Brunthaler; Heino Falcke (2005). "Constraints on the proper motion of the Andromeda galaxy based on the survival of its satellite M33" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 633 (2): 894–898. arXiv:astro-ph/0506609. Bibcode:2005ApJ...633..894L. doi:10.1086/491644. S2CID 17099715.
  9. ^ William Marshall Smart; Robin Michael Green (1977). Textbook on Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-521-29180-4.
  10. ^ Charles Leander Doolittle (1890). A Treatise on Practical Astronomy, as Applied to Geodesy and Navigation. Wiley. p. 583.
  11. ^ Simon Newcomb (1904). The Stars: A study of the Universe. Putnam. pp. 287–288.
  12. ^ Matra Marconi Space, Alenia Spazio (September 15, 2003). "The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues : Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues derived from the ESA Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission" (PDF). ESA. p. 25. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2016. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
  13. ^ See Majewski, Steven R. (2006). "Stellar motions: parallax, proper motion, radial velocity and space velocity". University of Virginia. Archived from the original on 2012-01-25. Retrieved 2008-12-31.
  14. ^ See lecture notes by Steven Majewski.
  15. ^ Hipparcos: Catalogues: The Millennium Star Atlas: The Top 20 High Proper Motion, European Space Agency, retrieved 2019-06-27
  16. ^ Lemay, Damien (1992). "Book-Review – Sky Catalogue 2000.0 – V.1 – Stars to Magnitude 8.0 ED.2". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 86: 221. Bibcode:1992JRASC..86..221L.
  17. ^ Akhmetov, V. S.; Fedorov, P. N.; Velichko, A. B.; Shulga, V. M. (2017-07-21). "The PMA Catalogue: 420 million positions and absolute proper motions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 469 (1): 763–773. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx812. ISSN 0035-8711.
  18. ^ Ghez, Andrea M.; et al. (2003). "The First Measurement of Spectral Lines in a Short-Period Star Bound to the Galaxy's Central Black Hole: A Paradox of Youth". Astrophysical Journal. 586 (2): L127–L131. arXiv:astro-ph/0302299. Bibcode:2003ApJ...586L.127G. doi:10.1086/374804. S2CID 11388341.
  19. ^ Andreas Brunthaler (2005). "M33 – Distance and Motion". In Siegfried Röser (ed.). Reviews in Modern Astronomy: From Cosmological Structures to the Milky Way. Wiley. pp. 179–194. ISBN 978-3-527-40608-1.
  20. ^ A. Brunthaler; M.J. Reid; H. Falcke; L.J. Greenhill; C. Henkel (2005). "The Geometric Distance and Proper Motion of the Triangulum Galaxy (M33)". Science. 307 (5714): 1440–1443. arXiv:astro-ph/0503058. Bibcode:2005Sci...307.1440B. doi:10.1126/science.1108342. PMID 15746420. S2CID 28172780.
  21. ^ Gough, Evan (12 February 2019). "Universe Today". The Astrophysical Journal. Retrieved 12 February 2019.
  22. ^ Steven Weinberg (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-852682-7.
  23. ^ J. R. Herrnstein; et al. (1999). "A geometric distance to the galaxy NGC4258 from orbital motions in a nuclear gas disk". Nature. 400 (6744): 539–541. arXiv:astro-ph/9907013. Bibcode:1999Natur.400..539H. doi:10.1038/22972. S2CID 204995005.
  24. ^ Otto Neugebauer (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. Birkhäuser. p. 1084. ISBN 978-3-540-06995-9.
  25. ^ "I. Considerations on the change of the latitudes of some of the principal fixt stars". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (in Latin). 30 (355): 736–738. 1719-12-31. doi:10.1098/rstl.1717.0025. ISSN 0261-0523.
  26. ^ Staff (September 15, 2003). "The 150 Stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue with Largest Proper Motion". ESA. Retrieved 2007-07-21.
  27. ^ "SIMBAD". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2016-04-13.
  28. ^ a b Fabricius, C.; Makarov, V.V. (May 2000). "Hipparcos astrometry for 257 stars using Tycho-2 data". Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement. 144: 45–51. Bibcode:2000A&AS..144...45F. doi:10.1051/aas:2000198.