This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | → | Archive 85 |
Hi, Earwig is giving me copyright violation warnings for both Prospect Hill (New South Wales) and a new page Prospect dolerite intrusion. The editor who created the new page has left a message saying they had copied alot of the text from the Prospect Hill page. Anyway I'm not too sure how to proceed. I've tagged both pages but could you please take a look? Best Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, are you able to load any of the iThenticate reports from CopyPatrol? This morning, all the ones I've clicked on have stalled for a few minutes and then they just say "Redirecting to similarity report..." with the ";(" emoji. Is it a Toolforge issue or just me? DanCherek (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:Dianna,
This is francabicon here and i would like to seek your assistance of judgement regarding the matter of my edit on three topics:
Here is my edit:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malaysian_United_Indigenous_Party&oldid=1053371794
Here is my edit:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Malays_National_Organisation&oldid=105337095
Here is my edit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malaysian_Islamic_Party&oldid=1053371583
Here is the problem I've edited 3 topics of Ideology, Controversy whit assisted contribution by many members but has been taken down by this User:Amir Noor Muhammad. I repeatedly told the user that if he has any arguments of this topic the user can talk to me about it but the user didn't just not talk to me about it and removed large chunks of our contribution of it which i don't think is fair for the people who had place an effort contribution to the new section of the page. Also adding to the fact that he had many Controversy on this talk page where the many user had criticize him for similar behaviour like that which you may check right over here: User talk:Amir Noor Muhammad.
Also the user had written to ban me from editing with his recent revert. The reason that the user always revert my edit is that "it's not related" "personal not on party lines" which i then replied to him stating that " so long as they are part of the party their political action is related to the party" but the user still insist on reverting.
Hope you understand that i don't mind to be wrong but i would like your best judgment on what you can do to resolve this matter because those topics are with valid links and valid facts. Thank you.
hope to hear frm you soon do talk to me if you do want to know more. User talk:Francabicon
Thank you so much for all the work you do. I just decided to take a break after three straight days on the Ruigeroeland CCI because I am so burned out. If I got burned out after only three days, how do you feel after doing things like this for years?! Again, thank you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your message concerning the page edit. I would be grateful for more detail on the reasons for deletion, you mentioned copyright, Could you be specific as to why sections don't comply. I wasn't aware of lifting sections verbatim. I think the page as it currently stands is very poor and is desparate need of editing, I am acting in good faith to try to remedy this. I'd be grateful for any suggestions, Thanks. WakeUpBoo (talk) 19:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
I have re-written the text, shall I re-post it or does it need to be checked beforehand? WakeUpBoo (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about confusion regarding copyright infringements, I just wanted to add I've updated my Talk with the articles that might needs a look at, it was my honest mistake in good faith and the issue will be rectified. Cltjames (talk) 18:10 eastern time, 4 Nov 2021. — Preceding undated comment added 22:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I understand that there are rules that have made you delete some of the text I have entered. I am not familiar with the ways to correctly do what I have been trying to do, and I am not sure I have the time to learn it by trial and error; however, there is a problem that I have been trying to solve. Someone has created the Important Marine Mammal Area (IMMA) entry unbeknownst to us, and the entry has several important mistakes that portray incorrectly the IMMA tool and the IUCN Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force that has created IMMAs, which is something that we need to avoid at all costs. I see two options to address the problem, which I am submitting to your kind advice: a) you take down the current IMMA entry, and we eventually make an entirely new one; or b) we find someone who will facilitate our wrok at the current entry so that we will be able to rectify all the wrong information that it contains. Your help will be very much appreciated, thanks. Disciara2.0 (Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, IUCN Marine Mammal Protected Areas Tas Force Co-chair).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Disciara2.0 (talk • contribs)
1. I have noted your information, thank you. We are really not concerned about having the profile of the Task Force (a non-commercial entity) on Wikipedia. We are concerned about rectifying information about the "Important Marine Mammal Area" (IMMA) initiative that was posted by someone we don't know, which provides wrong information about them which is potentially damaging. IMMAs are a tool for marine conservation freely provided to the conservation, business, academic and governmental communities recognised by intergovernmental policy organisations, and we are keen on ensuring that the information which describes them is correct. There's got to be a way to attain such goal without infringing copyright and conflict of interest rules. 2. I am not using more than one account. What you are seeing is two people dealing with this matter. We operate as a Task Force and I am sharing this concern with others. I hope in your understanding. Disciara2.0 (talk) 08:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Disciara2.0
Hello Diannaa! I've tried to warn the user Alpha Lion (talk · contribs) about copying within Wikipedia two days ago (a 4th warning), but they just went on to reinstate the content without attribution and adding more unattributed copy-paste work to it. There's clearly some good faith in the fact that they added "Copied from the article" multiple times in the article itself (see the previous diff), but they do have considerable trouble understanding the concept. Especially the fact that there's a big recent message on their talk page explaining the concept of edit summaries makes me think they have a serious WP:CIR issue. I think they would benefit from some more forceful admin attention, like you could give, if you're up to it. Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 16:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. You deleted a section I'd recently added to Chi Beta Phi. While similar to the About us page on that fraternity's official website here, for your ease of reference, I made a number of changes to the three or four sentences used, which it appears were the description of the group's official crest. A reference was provided, though because the lines were paraphrased, that section was not in quotation marks. I'd like this reverted, please. The claim that this was a COPYVIO here was too aggressive. You blanked the section, so I cannot analyze it right now, but if memory serves, every sentence, and most clauses of each sentence were changed.
This is, of course, a technical definition of a crest. As such, it is difficult to veer too far from its original text and still maintain accuracy. I could, alternatively, simply blockquote the original. Jax MN (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Franz_Staudegger&action=history
You had dealt with some apparent copyright issues there in May 2021. Dawnseeker2000 09:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Doug Weller took care of this. Dawnseeker2000 11:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Finished it - finally - and ran it through Earwig, [1] and it keeps coming up with those Frontline quotes, but otherwise it looks okay. Now it has to go through new article review, and when I put in my username to check on it, a copy vio note or tag or some such thing from you is still there. I was wondering if you would mind going and clicking that it has been fixed. That whole section turned out to be useless and got deleted completely. The ironies of WP. Thanx, Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Why did you take down Mark Kostabi's list of solo exhibitions while numerous other artists have similar lists on Wikipedia? 184.152.3.132 (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Your edits of this biographical article appear excessive, and you have vandalised recent additions which did not breach any copyright, and included important source references for text that remained in place but is now unsourced. Please revert those arbitrary edits Seneschally (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC).
Hi Diannaa, thank you for noting the problems with the Dementia edits. Do you mind giving me a little bit more information about the errors so we can try to improve the article? I did not look at the edit from a previous wikipedian for https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010079.pub3/full. Kind regards, JenOttawa (talk) 23:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, this article Caney Mountain looks like it has some serious copyvio going on, could you take a look for me please? Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, An unregistered User 2405:201:C001:D0A0:6175:D01E:89A7:F208 (talk) has been giving some hard time by continuously adding content with some unreliable source in the page Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. While i have been trying to prevent the page from vandalism, this particular unregistered user is does not seems to be stoppable. He adds booking site as a source, while i think it cannot be taken as reliable source. Correct me if i am wrong. And if not, please help me in preventing vandalism in page Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. Thankyou. Random Haste (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey Diannaa, there's a lot of relevant info here per the law and there's at least 7 other instances of copyright issues throughout the article from other users the same argument could be made for, but that's neither here nor there.
Just curious for suggestions on cutting down the information to one sentence to still satisfy the reporting as relevant to the event without triggering a copyright tag. Nothing's in quotes. Thanks. Onan808 (talk) 18:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your feedback, but I am a little confused as to what was removed and what was copyrighted, b/c the content are just gone. What was not copyrighted corrected? All of the material from pvlib docs have a BSD licenses which allows mix and reuse. I'm happy to make changes, add quotation marks, but it's really hard to know what to change if the content is completely gone. -- Mikofski (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I'm getting in over my head with Harold F. Reichenthal, which is almost verbatim the obituary on NeptuneSociety.com, but which the creating editor claims to have written and submitted to Neptune before publishing it as an article here. (See User talk:Deisenbe#Harold F. Reichenthal) I pointed Deisenbe to WP:Donating copyrighted materials which he believes is unnecessary. Not sure what steps to take next. Schazjmd (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed Turkish text from Al-Natili. It seems to be a copyvio from http://busbed.bingol.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/299712 based on the Earwig report https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Al-Natili&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. Please can you rev del. TSventon (talk) 08:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This a unilateral decision to delete that page. If some information looks like a copyright ed content then pls delete that part. But not the full article. There page needed for tulu script. Even I am also learning and researching tulu script. Pls it's my humble request. Even before publishing this article we have placed discussion on talk page. Where most of the people agreed to create this page. Mr anonymousMr (talk) 13:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
That page looks like it has content that was copy-pasted from https://web.archive.org/web/20111204112901/http://www.moiegypt.gov.eg/English/AboutMOI/HistoricalBackground/. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Diannaa, many thanks for your message about the Climate change in Europe page. I'm still a new editor and only want to make the best contributions to different articles. Thanks for your guidance. Noura2021 (talk) 16:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Under your analysis, articles Colorless green ideas sleep furiously and Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo would seemingly have to be deleted, which linguists would consider to be very, very strange... AnonMoos (talk) 04:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
I went back and fixed American Athletic Conference Football Championship Game (selection criteria). Let me know how it looks or see anything else. Thanks Bearcats fan (talk) 18:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a picture of Emunah La-Paz, which is a formal alter ego of the uploader. The picture appears online at, and is likely sourced from https://www.littleantproductions.com/about-us-black.html. Little Ant Productions appears to be a production company owned and/or managed by the uploader. Thus at this point all is probably satisfactory.
However, the picture is a poster of the movie Hidden Figures, a copyright work, with La-Paz standing in front of it. I do not feel competent to judge whether the addition of the person is sufficient to render this picture allowable here.
There is background you should be aware of. The AfD of the article and the quantity of indignation from the uploader is useful information for you. I know that this will not prejudice your unbiased review of copyright status, I simply wanted you to be aware that this matter is sensitive. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 08:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
((di-dw no source))
deletion template to the file as well.— Diannaa (talk) 14:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I've just reworded some of Cryptocarya mackinnoniana so that Earwig says it is now passable. I was wondering if some of the revisions might need to be struck out. Could you take a look when you have a minute please? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi. The user who has been blocked by you Theshabbyone, renamed. FYI, Thanks. chansey msg? 17:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincent Vega (talk • contribs)
Hey. What's the best way to tag a YouTube video screenshot that displays a print newspaper? Example. Thanks as always. El_C 14:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
((Di-dw no source no license))
— Diannaa (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
((di-replaceable fair use disputed))
) — is it even feasible to upload an image like that, or is that tag basically just for show? El_C 15:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
((di-replaceable fair use disputed))
is intended for talk pages and you are supposed to give a reason, i.e. ((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|your reason here))
((Di-dw no source no license))
will add the file to a deletion category and the file will get deleted a week later.— Diannaa (talk) 15:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
((Non-free newspaper image))
for it, even though someone else scanned, edited it into a video, and uploaded it to YouTube? El_C 15:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't know about these procedures, thanks for letting me know and explaining everything to me. Greetings. --LukeWiller (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC).
Hello, Thank you for your remark. I have difficulties to follow your instructions. Could you please help me with an example.Charles Inigo (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Diannaa, I hope you are well! In early October you removed copyvio from Foreign relations of the United States and provided attribution for other content – for which thank you! I've indeffed that editor, who is now the subject of a WP:CCI request. Anyway, just wondering, did you consciously decide not to revdelete, or did it perhaps just slip your mind? Regards as always, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The changes you made to [[3]] are great, and it seems that the article is ready to be published, can you please do that?
Anuraghazra (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you recently took away some of my edits on my page for Ryan Holiday's book. I definitely understand chapter summaries are a new concept for Wikipedia book pages, as most of them usually have summaries and background about the authors. I decided to include chapter summaries because I felt that it would make the page more worthwhile for readers who are on Wikipedia to research a book. I have also done chapter summaries for another one of Holiday's books, titled "'The Obstacle is the Way". Just thought I would share my thought process and explain why I un-reverted the change. Please feel free to let me know what you think and ask any questions! Coffeeking123 (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)coffeeking123
Hello again, Earwig gives a 95% copyvio warrning on Eagle Street but won't let me see the comparison between the two. Could you please take a look? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
The edits relied on key phrases from an openly distributed Royal Canadian Mounted Police paper pamphlet and referenced website, which expand and amplify terminology in the Firearms Act and its regulations. You'll note the two texts do not align perfectly. Mine has a header sentence and explanatory terminology not in the original. Definitions and key phrases cannot be casually rewritten. In the context of the other Wiki entries, my edit shows the differences between Canada and other countries. For the record, I have been an instructor of the Canadian Firearms Safety Course and a military unit public affairs representative. What I wrote may resemble copywrite material, but that was putting my expression into their Public Affairs voice.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maple leaf eh (talk • contribs)
Hello again, Earwig is giving Interior Board of Land Appeals a 95% violation warning, I've tagged it but could you take a look please? Best Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
((PD-notice))
template is already in place. So no problem.— Diannaa (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)I greatly apologize for testing this on your talk page but I have an issue with my layout in which new conversations start below the background and borders I have added to my user talk page. I was curious how it worked on yours. While I am here I would be remiss to not take the opportunity to thank you for all your hard work and contributions to the community and the encyclopedia. I have tremendous respect for editors who have been here for a long time and are in good standing regardless of whether I agree with all points they may have on every subject or not. You are an incredible individual. I love the colors I see. --ARoseWolf 18:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
I noticed you've deleted my edit to Reception and criticism of WhatsApp security and privacy features in such a way that I wasn't even able to recover the content (or link to that edit here). I understand that my edit reused too much text from the Propublica article. Three questions:
1. Do you honestly think Propublica would have any problem with their research being disseminated on Wikipedia, let alone sue for copyright violation?
2. Must you blindly enforce WP:COPY? Hope about a touch of WP:IAR and instead rephrasing my edit to meet your copyright standards?
3. What is more important to you: that this rule not be broken in the article, or for the public to be informed about this extremely important investigation into WhatsApp's questionable practices? -- Mitrel091 (talk) 20:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, recently I've been editing the article about Kuttam Pokuna and i have two questions.
The first is about a statement by a previous author: "This page incorporates content...". I don't see any evidence of permission. Furthermore, apart from the intro, no text from this website is left, although there is a number of references pointing to it. Can the statement be removed after I clean up the intro?
The second question is more pressing for me: I found one very interesting source, the most elabrate info about Kuttam Pokuna so far. The only problem is, it refers to the Wikipedia article (as it was in 2018). I don't think this source actually used any of the old Wiki content. There's no explicit reference and there wasn't much there at the time. But you see my problem? --Judithcomm (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, there looks like a lot of cut and paste in a new article The Yukon Regiment. I have tagged it but not reverted anything. Could you please take a look? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello again, Earwig is giving big alarms on Woodbury Granite Company for copyvio. I have tagged but not reverted anything. Could you please take a look at this one too? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
I seem to have been contacted for what might seem like a copy and paste from a website without permission. As a member of the railway I felt it was ok to take the info from our website and put it on the page. If that is still not ok I can make an edit to rephrase the information. 174.192.73.94 (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Diannaa.
Thank you for reminder about copyrights.
I think my contribution to ITER page respects copyrights:
Definition of Q, is scientific knowledge and does not belong to somebody (the same as definition of fusion for example). The text that I wrote is very close to one that we already have on appropriate wiki page Fusion energy gain factor. Also I think it is original (i.e. it does not exactly match to one in other sources). So could you please restore:
One of the ITER objectives is a Q-value ("fusion gain") of 10. Q measures the ratio between the (thermal) power produced by the fusion reactions and the external (thermal) heating power that must be injected in a tokamak (in order to warm up the plasma) to sustain the reactions. With 50 MW input thermal power used for heating plasma it is planned to get output (thermal) power of 500 MW from fusion reactions.
?
Info about Q=10, input (50 MW) and output (500 MW) power of ITER is taken from ITER press releases and so is not protected by copyrights too (as public info).
I also do not think that part
For commercial fusion power stations, engineering gain factor is important. Engineering gain factor takes into consideration all of the plants systems — not just external heating systems, but also secondary systems such as electromagnets, cryogenics plant, diagnostics and control systems — in the evaluation of the input/output power balance of an electricity-producing fusion power plant. Commercial fusion plants will be designed with engineering breakeven in mind.
is copyrights protected. I wrote this text from my head based on previous text of the same ITER page and based on definition of engineering gain factor (that is scientific knowledge too and is also available on Fusion energy gain factor page). So, could you please restore this part too?
In any case, appreciate if you could point exactly text used by me that is copyrights protected with reference to appropriate source and copyrights rules that protect this text (for this case and in the future).
Feel free to contact me if you still have any concerns about my contribution to ITER page. Vasyl Shcherban (talk) 07:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Q measures the ratio between the (thermal) power produced by the fusion reactions and the external (thermal) heating power that must be injected in a tokamak (in order to warm up the plasma) to sustain the reactions. With 50 MW input thermal power used for heating plasma it is planned to get output (thermal) power of 500 MW from fusion reactions.
For commercial fusion power stations, engineering gain factor is important. Engineering gain factor takes into consideration all of the plants systems — not just external heating systems, but also secondary systems such as electromagnets, cryogenics plant, diagnostics and control systems — in the evaluation of the input/output power balance of an electricity-producing fusion power plant. Commercial fusion plants will be designed with engineering breakeven in mind.
Some nuclear engineers consider a Q of 100 – a hundred-fold energy output – is required for commercial fusion power stations to be viable.
Q—also called "fusion gain"—measures the ratio between the power produced by the fusion reactions, and the external heating power that must be injected in a tokamak to sustain the reactions. By producing 500 MW of fusion power from 50 MW of power injected in the systems that heat the plasma—a "gain factor" of 10—ITER will open the way to the next step: a demonstration fusion power plant.
Engineering breakeven would take into consideration all of the plants systems—and not just external heating systems—in the evaluation of the input/output power balance of an electricity-producing fusion power plant. Commercial fusion plants will be designed based on a power balance that accounts for the entire facility: the electricity output, sent to the industrial grid, compared to the electricity consumed by the facility itself—not only in tokamak heating, but also in secondary systems such as the electricity used to power the electromagnets, cool the cryogenics plant, and run diagnostics and control systems.
— Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
For commercial fusion power stations, engineering gain factor is important. Engineering gain factor is defined as the ratio of a plant electrical power output to electrical power input of all plant's internal systems (tokamak external heating systems, electromagnets, cryogenics plant, diagnostics and control systems, etc.). Commercial fusion plants will be designed with engineering breakeven in mind.
Thanks for picking up that I had forgotten to include the attribution statement in Royal Commission into Joshua Arthur. I reverted your edit as the easiest way to restore the large number of links removed as it was not clear to me why that was done, and converting the category to text suggests it may have been unintentional. If there is some particular reason for removing the links I'm happy to discuss. I have of course kept the attribution statement. Cheers --Find bruce (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. I hope you're well. When you have time, I'd appreciate your opinion on India League (1928 Institute). A minority portion of the text is copied word-for-word from a source, but then a decent proportion of the non-copyvio content is closely paraphrased from that same source (without attribution). Does the latter constitute a copyright violation in and of itself, on top of the directly copied text? Cordless Larry (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. Would you mind checking Gleneagles Hospital Penang for copyvios. It recently underwent a major expansion by a possible COI/Paid editor and lots of the new content seems rather promotional. Some of what I removed also seem as if it was taken verbatim from the hospital's website or from some of its other promotional materials. I've already asked about this at WT:HOSPITAL, but that was before I noticed there might also be a copyvio issue. The same editor has also been working on a number of drafts for hospitals which means they might have the same problem. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hey Dianna, thank you for your feedback on my changes on the "Women in Tanzania" article and the tipps you send me; I'm obviously new at this and will pay more attention with the next changes I'll make. Have a good day!
Katja0610 (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I've been having trouble with a student editor, 808desiree808, who insists on adding and re-adding copyvio content to the article. He added copyvio content copied-and-pasted from The American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style with this edit and from this website with this edit.
To give you an idea of the general quality of his editing apart from copyvio edits, here's a sample of text he added here: "When things seem to be going well Captain James Cook arrived in 1778 bringing down the Hawai’ian population to almost extinct the arrival of Cook he not only brought devastation to the local people but he brought dieases such as small pox, measles, sexually transmitted dieases, influenza and whooping cough,Leaving the hawai’ians at just 40,000, Almost making their language and culture extinct as well." Carlstak (talk) 02:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa.
Perhaps if I explain myself and what Im trying to do, you might be able to point me in the right direction so that my edit is not removed over and over.
I now understand that part of my posting was not original, but just a copy & paste from the two links on the CRTC website. I was not trying to plagiarize, but only showing highlights as a summary from the two weblinks I had posted.
Ringless Voicemail is an actual service. It was created by myself in 1997. Then Bell Canada objected to my practices and I was taken to the CRTC (Canada Radio-tv Telecommunications Commission), where a court room/trial took place. CRTC agreed that ringless voicemail would be allowed in Canada. As such I would like to update the "status" of this legal marketing service available in Canada, which is offered by only a few service providers.
My SEO person had successfully created this new section in 2018. But the web link she posted was no longer active. So I tried to update with a new link from the CRTC website, but you removed it.
Currently your one line comment that "In Canada, the CRTC allows voice mail messages that do not interrupt the person's activities in real-time", this does not relate to the subject of Ringless Voicemail, and has nothing to do with it. How can you update this subject with a completely unrelated commentary??
Anyway, Those last two links I provided which are links to the CRTC website, they explain the current legality with Ringless Voicemail, and how it arrived to be legal service in Canada. Why will you not allow them to be listed to explain clearly to the public how Ringless Voicemail came to be?
As you stated, Im not trying to make this forum my "mouth piece". I am only trying to update this subject with historical and factual information on a communications service which is recognized and legalized by the government of Canada. Yes, and it just so happens that I was the first one who created it.
I am asking that you please give me your guidance, so to avoid being edited again.
Thank you Diannaa.
(I hope Im using this talk page correctly)
cesar. Cesar correia (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021. Current and upcoming events
Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news
It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
Changes later this week
Special:MentorDashboard
. It allows registered mentors, who take care of newcomers' first steps, to monitor their assigned newcomers' activity. It is part of the Growth features. You can learn more about activating the mentor list on your wiki and about the mentor dashboard project.action=ajax
, will be removed this week. Any scripts or bots using it will need to switch to the corresponding API module. [4]jquery.jStorage
, which was deprecated in 2016, will be removed this week. Any scripts or bots using it will need to switch to mediawiki.storage
instead. [5]Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
It is clear that GREATER HAMILTON. Freecall. has copied content from Wikipedia not the other way around (they didn't even remove the parenthesis that surrounded the dates!). Suggest you reverse your edits concerning copyright violation.
Text from Hamilton, Victoria - Wikipedia added 19JAN2011 Hamilton Art Galleryis world-renowned and one of the major regional collections in Victoria. Its collections spans Australian and European paintings and decorative arts and Chinese, Japanese and Korean decorative arts, with the majority being 18th century or later. In particular the Gallery holds 22 gouache by English painter Paul Sandby (1731-1809), second only to the holding of the Queen.
Edit to wikipedia on 23 May 1916 Hamilton Gallery Established in 1961, Hamilton Gallery’s renowned collection features a decorative arts focus (well over half of its collection) of both Australian and International objects from the 17th century through to the present. Asian art and Australian paintings and prints are strongly represented but the Gallery is perhaps most well-known for its rare collection of gouache and watercolour pictures by Paul Sandby (1731-1809).
Text from GREATER HAMILTON. Freecall.
Established in 1961, Hamilton Gallery s renowned collection features a decorative arts focus (well over half of its collection) of both Australian and International objects from the 17th century through to the present. Asian art and Australian paintings and prints are strongly represented but the Gallery is perhaps most well known for its rare collection of gouache and watercolour pictures by Paul Sandby ( ) depicting the English landscape.
regards Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, user Faze Tome, has added copyvio content to the Santa Barbara, California article that has been reverted, and in draft pages they've created, too. These need to be revdel'ed. Thanks, Carlstak (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your input on the above article. Would you happen to have a link to the WP instructions regarding the attribution I left out? I'd like to get current on this. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I saw you deleted my distributions, however, all the sources I used are provided by my professor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suisheng (talk • contribs) 03:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you edited the Eurojust page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurojust) recently. May I kindly ask you to replace the outdated Eurojust logo currently on the Wikipedia page with the new Eurojust logo (adopted in 2019), as documented here: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/media-and-events/media-kit. For example, a full color Eurojust logo is available here: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Mediakit/Logos/Eurojust-Logo_FullColor-CMYK.png Many thanks and keep up the good work! Kind regards, Tomaz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.166.34.242 (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, a noticed that this article has a lot of text from this 2010 journal, so I assume the journal article came first. This is not a new addition, so just leaving a note here if can take a look when you get a chance. It looks like the text has been in the article for 10 years, so I thought it would be best to leave this one entirely to you. Thanks. MB 18:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello D. I hope you are well. In the past adding the list of films at The Great Movies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) have been deleted as a copyvio so I thought I'd make you aware of this edit. I don't know if putting them in a table sourced to Ebert's website changes things or not. If it doesn't you should also be aware that the table was created in a sandbox. Thanks for your time and I hope you have a delightful holiday season :-) MarnetteD|Talk 19:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa, thank you for your feedback on Nov.20 on my Wikipedia article "Autism in China"! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_in_China). But I wish to respectfully say that I am quite curious about why my block quote was deleted. I did use a block quote under the "Diagnosis Procedure" as the following. Is it because the use of this block quote is too long, or since it's for explaining purpose as opposed to summarizing?
Thanks! --Ha.susulat (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
I see, we want to make sure everyday readers (without knowledge on Wikipedia formatting) understand the Wikipedia formats and what are the quotes too... Thank you for the clear explanation, Diannaa! --Ha.susulat (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Greetings. Could you check out the deleted version of this article? This seems to be a very well-done article for a brand new user, with this being their first contribution. Since this article has a history of sock activity, it raises my suspicions. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 11:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The problem here is that we all use the same few sources.However I did take a shortcut by using Mark Willams Metamorphis site.I will go back over all my recent charaxes edits replacing the borrowed text (mea culpa) with "Information on the biology of this species is given by Larsen, Kielland Pringle etc" with the appropriate ref.Thankyou for the warning I should have anticipated.Best regards Notafly (talk) 11:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC) Is this ok with you?
I'm not sure whether you get involved in copyright issues on Commons. All the files in this article are under discussion at Commons in order to seek to determine whether they are allowed there. If they are not allowed there I am unsure whether they might be allowed under one of the exemptions here. I know the creating editor will be grateful for all possible advice. Anything you feel able to contribute to the conversation, probably in the deletion discussions at commons, will be well received. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
quotations are used to explain a point that can be paraphrased.) No matter what source it came from, that is unacceptable; the deletion has nothing to do with Catholicism but rather that the text is copyrighted (which is what the copyright notice shows). Proper citation on Wikipedia does not involve any direct copying, but rather paraphrasing information and putting an inline citation to the original source; see the guide on referencing.
Hi Diannaa, please can you revdel a copvio from by an IP at Emin Duraku.
Hi there. I am contacting as I have got the impression that you frequently deal with copyright violations in articles. These additions in [6] seem to be have been copied largely one-to-one from the references. I think I've trimmed the most offending parts in this change: [7] I have also informed the contributor in question on their Talk page: User talk:Allmodcons1978
Could you please check whether the revision needs to be deleted and perhaps inform the user in a more formal way? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
I write my own sentence then provide references. Have you cross-checked with the source? Its not the copy/paste. Please double check. It took me two hours to research before writing the four sentences.
Thanks Canberra2021 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
BilCat (talk) 00:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Environmental policy of the Joe Biden administration
The information that I added re the Biden infrastructure bill was removed instantly so that it is hard to believe that you even read it. I don't believe it was a copy vio and I have no idea how I can add for example what structures money was to go for other than put it in the article. I need to see the copy so that I can make whatever adjustments you believe I need to make. Sectionworker (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I see you are formerly Gandydancer, and there's five additional copyright warnings/notices at User talk:Gandydancer. I am placing a final warning on your (new) user talk page.— Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Can you explain in what way a folk poem collected by a folklorist is of "uncertain copyright status"? This is a poem that is reported to have existed before any Swedish copyright laws.--Berig (talk) 08:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
I translated the lyrics myself, I’m not sure why you deleted them with an explanation about copyright? Could you please explain why they were deleted or restore them?
Thank you in advance HoneyBuns51 (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Dianna, I'm upset with what was done to my edits. I hope you will revert them immediately. If you take a deeper dive you will see that I have been fixing a deeply flawed article with context, rewriting plagiarism, and replacing junk sources. This is what I started with in July: link to article
I'm not a Wikipedia regular, I'm an expert that comes online at times to correct really problematic psychology articles.
I've made 80 edits, added 11,770 bytes, removed 31,144. I have run plagiarism checks on it and worked to clean up the plagiarism. I have gone through the citations and replaced weak RS with more reputable ones. I have stripped out the well intentioned psychobabble and reworded things to be understandable and accurate for professionals and casual readers.
Today, I spend 5 hours running a plagiarism checker on the first third of the articles and copy editing the existing text. I can't understand why you would just wipe it out these simple copy edits in the name of plagiarism?
I stay out of the wiki-drama, no matter how hard I'm baited, and I walk away when editors get into it. It's already to time intensive to edit here without the drama.
If this is about the photos: I assumed that photos on Wikimedia were fair game. If that's not that case, then please tell me what I need to look for to determine which photos can be used.
If this is about copying text from another article - if you look closer, I actually rewrote and found difference sources because of the errors. And I made note of the transfer as per the advice given to me by another admin.
With all that goes on here, its getting hard to justify investing time. If we can't get this resolved, this will be the last straw for me - not because of you - but the drama overall. There has to be a more constructive way to educate editors than blunt force - removing the work from sight so that everything has to be done over from scratch. Wiki-psyc (talk) 00:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, the Schindler's Ark article was changed to non-fiction novel on 27 November 2021 - previously it was listed for years as historical fiction. Denisarona (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, is there some Wikipedia guidance about not copying translations of foreign language sources into Wikipedia? I know it should be obvious, but copyright rules are rarely obvious. TSventon (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
If the source is in a language other than English, the contributor may be under the mistaken belief that the act of translation is a sufficient revision to eliminate concerns of plagiarism. On the contrary, regardless of whether the work is free, the obligation remains to give credit to authors of foreign language texts for their creative expression, information and ideas, and, if the work is unfree, direct translation is likely to be a copyright violation as well.
— Diannaa (talk) 14:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Io, Saturnalia! | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC) |
Greetings and thank you!— Diannaa (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I saw that you gave a final warning on December 4 to JonesJaguar here: User talk:JonesJaguar#December 2021. Unfortunately I have just removed more copyvio that they added today at American kestrel (CopyPatrol) and Proboscis bat. DanCherek (talk) 17:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. This edit seems like it was copy-pasted from an outside source. Unfortunately I am not able to say from which source. Some of it may be from this press release. As you have dealt with this editor's copyvio previously, maybe you can take a look of it. Beagel (talk) 08:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, I have reverted two edits with information copied from a Guardian article and warned the editor.
Hi Diannaa, I was wandering, how much of a copyright text can be directly copied with attribution please? None? Or just a sentence? Are direct quotes from newspapers etc permitted provided they are short and attributed? I’m worried about adding content in future like this because the very last thing I want is an official warning or block. So will be treading super carefully. Thank you. - Such-change47 (talk) 12:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Diannaa; thanks for the excellent help with Such-change47’s work at FAR. I am once again reminded of my own inexperience.
I am aware that Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/WikiProject Tropical cyclones is an enormous undertaking for the few editors who work at CCI, and am attempting to help by at least reviewing the FAs as they come up at FAC, FAR and WP:URFA/2020. Because of all the copying within and public domain sources, and the high number of hurricane FAs, the work is quite time consuming. I have also encountered instances in the past where Earwig fails to detect copyvio towards the end of a FAC because of extensive interim copyediting that occurs during a GA or FAC review, so there is a need to check older versions. I am still trying to develop a methodology and format (hoping others in the FA review processes will follow suit).
I now have questions about my work spread all over creation, and don’t feel confident to move forward on others at URFA without more feedback. Would it be OK with you (that is, do you have the time) if we kept a thread open here where I could post my Dummies 101 questions? Work at FAR is at a deliberately slow pace, so there is no urgency, but I have several reviews stalled now, awaiting checks on my methodology. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Holiday cheer | ||
Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022 D. MarnetteD|Talk 02:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hi There - thanks for your message regarding content at Will Todd. We are the publishers of his music and his agent so were just trying to correct quite a few odd elements on the current page. There are so many troublesome elements eg: the list of works is quite random and confusing. But your comments are noted. Many thanks Tyalgum Press and Will Todd Music (We also own and curate www.willtodd.co.uk) 2A00:23C7:6700:2101:C138:E04A:4CF6:F07F (talk) 08:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
In response to the speedy deletion of my article about Donald Kreider, I have created a draft of a considerably expanded and revised article, which avoids direct copying, in so far as possible, of material in obituaries for Donald Kreider. I am in the process of obtaining copyright permission for the photograph of Kreider from his partner Bill White, who took the photo and supplied it to Dartmouth for use in the obituary.
I would like to include a link to an oral history in the Rauner Special Collection at Dartmouth. My preferred link
to an on-line copy of the history was rejected because the site at Google is blacklisted. I can supply a link to the catalog entry for the history in the Rauner Collection, but it is not possible to read the oral history by following that link. How can I make the history readable on-line? 21:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)SJGarland — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJGarland (talk • contribs)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding ((subst:User:Coffee/Holidays)) to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Hello Diannaa - thank you for your attention to Draft:Paul Klimos. As we are new to Wikipedia editing, we would appreciate your guidance on how to rephrase the content of your latest deletions without causing potential copyright violations. Following the initial comments and deletions we got from you, we worked to revise/rephrase the text to avoid any ad literam transposition (even though everything was duly referenced via links). The goal is to list and reference the titles/position held by the individual subject matter of this Wikipedia article, with links to the sources/official websites that list him as such for each position (in addition to various third party news sources about such appointments and positions). Again, thank you very much for your time and patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contentforleb (talk • contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
No, confirming I'm the only person with authorized access to this account. I got into the habit of using "we" in life whenever I can avoid using the "I" =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contentforleb (talk • contribs) 13:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much! Is there a way for me to redo and share with you a new draft of the sections you deleted before publication, such as I ensure it's done correctly once and for all and avoid additional copyright issues? Again, big thanks for your time and patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contentforleb (talk • contribs) 14:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you - done =) Merry Christmas! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contentforleb (talk • contribs) 14:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa can you please help my friend Bracha L. Ettinger concerning her portrait of Emmanuel Levinas, done by her as a part of her artistic portraits project in 1991. Many people use this portrait used from the philosopher Wikipedia page without mentioning her name as its author-photographer. Today, Le Figaro printed this photo without giving her due credit. How can this be mended? Best wishes, Dora Doraannao (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you and best wishes!!!!
Hi Diannaa, thank you for your welcome message. I've tried to rephrase the source with my own words,but I think it's important to mention the main papers he works for. Would that work? Thank you for your time, Luisveraluz (talk) 17:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
I removed text [[8]] from the Villa article which I thought be a likely word for word copyvio from near the top of web page [[9]]. At the bottom of the web page it states 'All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2020'. User:Amit005thmar has recently replaced it with the edit summary minor. Please can you help?SovalValtos (talk) 12:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
You made a null edit to this article to add an edit summary WP:RIA. Attribution: text appears to have been copied from Seaward 25 on December 23, 2021. Please see the history of that page for full attribution.
I am not sure why you would think that, as exactly no text was copied from Seaward 25. The two boats were designed by different naval architects and made by different builders, there is little in common between them other than they are both sailboats. All these sailboat class articles are written in a common encyclopedic style and use common sets of references, but there is no copying from existing posted articles involved. If in the future you think that text was copied from one article to another can you first bring it up on the article talk page to avoid these mistakes in future? - Ahunt (talk) 20:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diana, I recently edited an article which got reverted by you. Although I gave a lot of time while editing it, I later checked and realised that content I provided was correct but not related to the article I edited. Thanks for correction. Akshay1478963 (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 03:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa: Nice to hear from you! I am the original contributor of AR Computer To Terminate Eyestrain And Myopia https://eyewiki.org/AR_Computer_To_Terminate_Eyestrain_And_Myopia All the contents on the website are written by myself. Could you please tell me what should I do if I want to make a same or similar article on Wikipedia?
Best regards and Happy Christmas
Crescentnz Crescentnz (talk) 02:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for policing the multiple edits to Vitamin C and explaining to the offending editor the error of their ways. David notMD (talk) 21:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
After adding citations where requested, adding new, albeit contradictory information in the article, 2000 words were just summarily reverted back to the original article. I have no problem with removing inaccurate information,even if my own, or requests for clarifications, but this is beyond reasonable. You even deleted direct references and citations from respected authorities, and direct references to supporting statements by the Catholic Church!
I can see why many people are ignoring pleas for financial assistance. If facts are just wiped out, who cares about WikiPedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deusestiudex (talk • contribs) 18:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed a glitch in infobox on the article Rohit Thakur (politician) . The infobox is showing him as a Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Himachal Pradesh When I tried to fix it, I could not find anything related to the error in the source code. I even tried visual editor but still no result.
I request you to please fix it if possible. I would be happy if you could tell me if it was a editing error or wrong source code for infobox. Thanks....👍👍👍👍 Soap Boy 1 (talk) 21:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I just reviewed Sewellia lineolata, but removed a section and reworded another section for copyvio, could you please take a lokk and see if the old versions need to be struck out? Thanks. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for you service to wikipedia.
Naarter (talk) 20:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
A token of thanks
Hi Diannaa! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, ((u|Sdkb)) talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)