This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hai The9Man, Nice to meet you. Ramesh Ramaiah ^talk 20:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K. R. Ramesh Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Addagal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

The articles are from High authority websites and cannot be considered as spam For your information you can search “About Gaurav Gaikwad” “Who is gaurav gaikwad” “Blogger Gaurav Gaikwad”

Don’t mention spam unless ams until you don't do a proper research

Stefanhauff (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Stefanhauff is a suspected sock puppet and has been blocked indefinitely. The9Man | (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man, Thank you for reviewing the article Runki Goswami. Jai49 (talk) 13:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mz7: Thanking you for showing the trust. - The9Man | (talk)

Hi, I just noticed that you've placed a bpl tag on K. K. Singh. The subject does not fall under bpl. He died in 2011. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

@TheBirdsShedTears:  Done -- The9Man | (talk) 10:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man! Which part or section in K. K. Singh article is not cited so that i can google for more sources accordingly? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

@TheBirdsShedTears: I found the lack of reliable secondary sources. - The9Man | (talk) 10:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. The article's notability is supported by bollywoodmdb.com, times of india, boxofficeindia, bollywoodlife, BookMyShow, hungama Bollywood. Are they not reliable secondary sources? TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

TheBirdsShedTears Except TOI others are not considered as reliable sources in Wikipedia. You need to find better secondary references. The9Man | (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

TheBirdsShedTears Also please check WP:ICTF and WP:ICTFFAQ for your future reference. - The9Man | (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

The page User talk:Rishabkapania77 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Deep fried okra talk 11:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra: I am the one who nominated it for the Speedy Deletion. I wonder why did you leave this message at my talk page! - The9Man | (talk) 11:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Bloody software. I guess twinkle gave you that because it thought you created it. I'll go back that user talk and see.Deep fried okra talk 12:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I clicked the wrong button, and twinkle did the rest. Sorry for the confusion.Deep fried okra talk 12:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Never mind - it happens. I just got confused a bit. - The9Man | (talk) 12:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

U deleted the page "Hinduism in Thailand" i created.I want to Know why .I want to make a separate wikipedia page on the Hinduism on Thailand.There is no wikipedia page dedicated to this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carosalazar18 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

@Carosalazar18: Hinduism in Thailand already exists in Wikipedia which is currently redirected to Hinduism in Southeast Asia#Thailand where it is already talked in detail. You have created the page Hinduism in thailand with a different letter case.
When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. - The9Man | (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

U tell me a different letter case of Hinduism in Thailand (that you won't delete). Carosalazar18 (talk) 13:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello kindly review my new article Kinita Kadakia Patel (Shubham Ghodke) 19:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Good work so far reviewing new pages! I looked through several of your recent reviews, and only found one error: Shrouded Divine's sources are not considered reliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, so I've gone ahead and redirected it to the article about the band. Keep up the good work overall! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Rosguill Thank you very much for taking a look. I will take more care while going through references in the future.
Btw, I wonder how do you manage to review so many pages in a day, it takes hours for me to review 10-20 pages. :) Is it experience or any other tips you would like to share? - The9Man | (talk) 06:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

i review a lot of redirects, which inflates my count quite a bit. You will find it easier with experience though. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Great! That gave me some hope for improvement. - The9Man | (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Prananath College, Khordha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 explicitly excludes educational institutions. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 10:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@SoWhy: Thank you for the link. It is usefull. - The9Man | (talk) 10:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Please ask for administrator help to move a page you can't move yourself, rather than doing a cut-paste like you did at Muvattupuzha Taluk. See WP:RM. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Wbm1058: Thanks. Noted the same and will take care in future. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man: thanks for reviewing my work on the draft I M 24. Please do look on my other contribution Adhaat (film), Firrkie (film) as well if you could. Thanks, I appreciate your efforts. Dmuteg (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

@Dmuteg:, I can see that both Adhaat (film) and Firrkie (film) are getting delayed for a while. Can you share the link where it is clearly mentioning the Principal photography is started? - The9Man | (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man:, Yeah sure, definitely I will. Well actually the film titled during the announcement was Aadat (film). Then during the filming it was in the reliable sources mentioned Aadat Dairies (film). Then during the climax shoot it was stated Adhaat (film). I'm providing a number of sources which states the principal photography is started and the movie is delayed for release. "^{[1][2][3][4][5][6]}". Thee sources are from the first day shoot to climax to the special song shoot with Iulia Vantur. Whereas Firrkie (film) source which states principal photography started are available on Google. But I do apologise as some of the source are considered unreliable with Wikipedia policy. "^{[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]}". I hope it could help you review the article. Thanks Dmuteg (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

The user Dmuteg blocked for being WP:SOCK - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

This is with regards to the wiki page which was created for the tamil movie Plan Panni Pannanum and sent for re-review. Based on the comments earlier, the reference links were added accordingly.

It would be great if you give us an approval on this. The movie is about to release soon and it would be a boost for us while promoting this movie. Vaths20 (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

@Vaths20: I will take a look if you can share the url. - - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man Here's the URL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Plan_Panni_Pannanum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaths20 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man Here's the URL,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Plan_Panni_Pannanum Vaths20 (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC) Vaths20

Hello,

This is the URL of our Tamil movie Plan Panni Pannanum's Wikipedia page.

[1]

The changes have been incorporated accordingly. Please go through it and kindly give approval on the same. Vaths20 (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC) Vaths20

The given references are not enough to make the movie notable. Please refer WP:NFILM. - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

As per the guidelines and your feedback, I have added more reference links. Please let me know feedback on this and it would be great if you give us an approval on the same.Vaths20 (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Vaths20

[2]

• Mathdestruction (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Reshma Kewalramani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Thanks for taking the time to look over my draft article. I would not be so concerned one way or another if an article I wrote ended up included in Wikipedia, except I think in this case the subject does fall on the side of notability, although very close to the line, I agree. First of all, I think the Boston Globe article is mainly about Kewalramani, is not a passing mention, and is a reliable source. Secondly, her position as the first female CEO of a pharma company gives her added status, and being a woman of color also contributes to her unique position, which I think helps to push her into notability. She is a good example of the struggle for diversification in the corporate world, and if I may add, her inclusion in the encyclopedia also improves Wikipedia's status as a more diverse repository for biographies of living people. I hope I can convince you that an article about her would enhance the encyclopedia, not detract. Thanks for your consideration. In the meantime I will keep my eyes open for more and better sources to back up my intuition about this article. Thanks for considering my plea. (I am of course also open to any suggestions you might have about how I can get this article out of draft in any other way, since I pretty much have not found any other sources than what are already on the draft.)

Mathdestruction (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mathdestruction: I understand your concern. But a BLP should satisfy the requirements of WP:PERSON to get into the mainspace. Also notability is not inherited. It is also taken to notice that she is not the CEO yet but will be taking charge in the future, an event which does not happen yet. - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

As per the guidelines and your feedback, I have added the citations wherever required in th reference links. Please let me know your feedback on this and it would be great if you give us an approval on the same.Vaths20 (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Vaths20

[3]

Hi, I noticed that, you have rejected my draft on Draft:Basab Chaudhuri . He is the current Vice Chancellor of West Bengal State University, located in West Bengal, India. 90% of the content on this page is directly based on the press coverage in the Millenium Post and the most circulated Bengali daily Anandabazar. Even his researchgate profile has been given as an external source. The information contained herein is partly extracted from the University website (Office of Vice Chancellor (VC). It's almost impossible for a man to get vast coverage and I don't think it should be the only criteria for a draft to get published. He is an well known academic in West Bengal and holds the designation of VC in a State University. I do belive that I have adequate notability and reliable sources to support the article. Now it's arduous for me to gather more sources to validate what I have written there. Please consider that. You can check the university website also. Thanks. DeoxysX (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man, thank you for your edit on the Fuad Khuri page and more specifically the BLP tag. I wanted to inform you that Khuri is deceased and has been since 2003 so I am not sure if the BLP tag still applies in this case as it only applies to living persons. What are your thoughts on the matter? Droodkin (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Droodkin You are right, it was a mistake from my end. - The9Man ^(Talk) 16:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Peter Madana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 09:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man, Thank you for reviewing Geetanjali Salon article, I received your message as you have tagged the article for speedy deletion. Please let me clarify that I have sourced all the information from genuine articles published in the open domain, and have included only those points that I found were published in other salon Wikipedia pages. May I know which line/term of the article did you find promotional?Kuldeep pandey997 (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

• Edit4Well (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ddevjani Mitra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi The9Man, Thanks for reviewing my article but unfortunately it is not nominated for approval by your end! Apart from that, you suggested about Reliable secondary sources needed, As I have already done Referencing as maximum as I could on my article so can you please guide me more about this so I can make my article eligible for approval from your end, please help so I can do more better, please reply as this is very necessary for me to become a good Wikipedian.

Edit4Well (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Edit4Well:, It is required BLPs to meet the notability in Wikipedia to have a mainspace article. I believe the said person is not meeting the WP:PERSON and WP:GNG. - The9Man ^(Talk) 15:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

• Edit4Well (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ddevjani Mitra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello The9Man,

Sorry for disturbing you again, but I really need your help so that's for, I hope you understand! as you replied that the subject in BLPs is not meeting with notability guidelines but I want to make you know that all the references to make my subject notable were from a reliable source(i.e, Newspaper ) so why my subject is not in light of notability, please elaborate..... please help! thankyou for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edit4Well (talk • contribs) 15:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Powerfulideas (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)In case you have admin rights, please do check the page below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kautik_International_Film_Festival Someone has marked it for deletion. No idea why. Thank you.

• @Powerfulideas: This is nominated for deletion by a New article reviewer based on the notability. It will be discussed by other Wikipedians, normally for at least seven days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on community consensus. There is nothing an Admin or anyone else can do during this process. More about the process here at WP:AFD - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A. R. Rahman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man, I just want to know in which basis you can say Bhopal Samachar is looking as a promotional content. Actually I am not defaming you i just want to know the criteria because article like Bhopal Samachar is available on english wikipedia for example you can check ThePrint, Alt News, The Wire (India) and many more even a article with Bhopal Samachar in Hindi Language is available on Hindi Wikipedia. I feel glad if you reply and clear my doubts. Shaunit Nishant 10:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaunitnishant (talk • contribs)

This is a news blog like thousands of other blogs out there. It doesn't have any reliable secondary sources to establish its notability or WP:GNG. It doesn't have any reliable references on the Hindi page either. Rest assured, I will recommend it for deletion as well when I get time. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

The article A. R. Rahman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A. R. Rahman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for creating this page. Just wondering why you copied information from this unreliable source: https://www.onenov.in/palak-lalwani-actress/. Basically, this source is unreliable. --TamilMirchi (TALK) 17:43, 1 May 2020, (UTC)

I have taken it from various sources which I found okay. I can see that you have changed the things. Seems to be okay. Also note that copying within Wikipedia is allowed. - The9Man ^(Talk) 04:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Please post an article. Thank. Namerst (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man,

Thank you for creating The Lift Boy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are minor copy edit problems which need to be sorted out. Best.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|AaqibAnjum)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 18:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

@AaqibAnjum:, It would be helpful if you can mention which part. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello i saw your redirect of P&O ports to P&O company. I first wanted to do the same but after reading P&O company page i thought it was about the 19th century british company while P&O ports is a subsidiary of DP World after P&O was acquired by DP world. Also, the port operator is called P&O ports rather than just P&O and there's also other subsidiaries such as p&O ferries. I'm not sure if they are the same thing or not as the P&O wiki page says the company became defunct while P&O ports is a company that was established in Dubai so I amnot sure. Appreciate any advice thank you Limghadar (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi I am just reviewing this article and was going to PROD it on the grounds of WP:BLP1E, but then I saw you’d accepted it at AfC. I’m just wondering what you think about the BLP:1E question, and whether you think I’m missing something? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mccapra, I was double-minded to take a call on this. However, I was somehow convinced about the notability. So I decided to accept the article but left the review part to involve a second editor as well. If you believe WP:BLP1E is applicable, please feel free to AfD. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

OK thanks for letting me know. All the best. Mccapra (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for reviewing and offering your thoughts on the Brian Tome Wikipedia page. Upon review of the article I agree with you stance on peacocking and am working on making edits to be more informative. Let me know if there are specific areas that you think are not being as subjective as the standard of Wikipedia, and Biographies should maintain.

Further, I see that there is a Notability strike on the page. I'm unsure on your thoughts on this and would love to know more about what you think is required for a pastor to be notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page.

Thanks again for your guidance on this! Russell.Bickel (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell.Bickel (talk • contribs) 20:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Marilyn Monroe on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Square One: Michael Jackson on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elon Musk on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Sir , i have created an article name- Simran Upadhyay. And you have selected for "Consider Deletion" . Sir may I know what is the reason to seleslct my created article for "Consider Deletion" . If you tell me then I can improve my skills , so that I can edit better. Thanks Myslfsbhijit (talk) 13:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shaherose Charania on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man

Thank you for creating Nike Onifade.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Was already nominated as AFD when I reviewed it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|North8000)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I am writing to you about page SkyWay. A member of Yanmarka introduced the article about the ban on the company's activities in 17 countries, but there is no such amount in the given source. It also refers to a potential scam, but this is not indicated in the source. Help me figure this out, please. Also, if it was decided to introduce this information into the introduction, then I consider it necessary to remove the section of financial regulation and sections of countries where everything is very blurred. Thank you very much.Porar234 (talk) 07:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Porar234: What is Yanmarka? Is it a competitor or any regulatory? - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man: I meant the Yanmarka user. I don't know who he is. Please tell us whether it is advisable to add such information to the introduction? Especially talking about the number of countries that are not stated in the attached source, as well as mentioning fraud that is not specified in the source.Porar234 (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@Porar234: Okay. Please WP:DISCLOSE if you have any Conflict of Interest in this matter. We can take it from there - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

There is no conflict of interest.Porar234 (talk) 07:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

If you don't have any WP:COI, you can edit the article yourself the way Wikipedia pliciies adherit. Please take a look on WP:NPOV and WP:CRIT. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I'm sending you this message since you seem to have been involved in reviewing the Draft:K. Surendran (politician). Even though the submission was declined and was subject to a previous AfD discussion, the creator has attempted to bring it into the mainspace by moving K. Surendran to K. Surendran (writer) and appropriating the former space for the page of the politician. I've reverted the appropriation but would it be possible to restore it to the pre move state (Since the writer is the only one who's notable with that name) without breaking attribution? Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Tayi Arajakate Looking into it. I will update on the same here soon. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

You were right in your point and it is fixed now. - The9Man ^(Talk) 14:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I saw, thanks for the help. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey, as you described Anupama Pathak for poor and not be notable for her work. If she not done anything in her life so why media doing publising articles again and again. There is lot of peoples died due to corona but media not covraging that if a artist of person not done any major work it does not mean he or she done nothing. Its about her lifetime achievement as per media saying in thair articles she is working in Bhojpuri films and tv serials and after her death this matter is very essential or trending so i thought it must be move to her name.

Thank you. Its about her notability work its not about single work but its about her lifetime work. Kindly look into..

Please share your views on the Deletion discussion page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Is there a reason that you restored a previous bad edit that added an image that doesn't exist and replaced a valid field name with an invalid one at Pavitra Bhagya?[4]] --AussieLegend (✉) 17:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

@AussieLegend: I didn't do that. I was away from the system. I am changing the credentials. Please keep a look on the account. - The9Man ^(Talk) 17:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the heads up. Not sure what went wrong. - The9Man ^(Talk) 17:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

You don't know about Swetabh Gangwar, that doesn't mean he is not a famous personality. Don't delete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamkaran1994 (talk • contribs) 08:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Please re-review the article for ‘Rahul Kumar Pandey’ 1) Added sufficient references (stated by you) 2) Edited sentences which were looking like advertising.

As I’m still in the learning phase of Wikipedia, request you to help me with it and edit the part required from your side. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raaahulpandey (talk • contribs) 18:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my article. I added the proper references, also a lot of references are available on google. Raaahulpandey (talk) 10:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Please re-review the article for ‘Rahul Kumar Pandey’

1) Added sufficient references (stated by you) 2) Edited sentences which were looking like advertising. 3) Corrected the errors.

(As I’m still in the learning phase of Wikipedia, request you to help me with it sir and edit the part required from your side. Thank you!) Raaahulpandey (talk) 19:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Please patrol the article - Sergey Albertovich Smirnov. Thank. Namerst (talk) 08:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man I have published article on Y S Venkat Reddy because he was the founder of Most Powerful family of Andhra Pradesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JayantVitthal Babu (talk • contribs) 11:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

I am not seeing any notability for this subject. If you can establish, please do it on the discussion page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dinesh D'Souza on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Please petrol this article. Commander Safeguard (character). User:Real Mishi Dar (User talk:Real Mishi Dar) 09:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Please also petrol these articles. Noori Natt, Maula Jatt (character), Jeera Blade, Sheeda Pastol, Khushia, Shararat (1975 film), Wehshi Jatt and Banarsi Thug (1973 film)User:Real Mishi Dar (User talk:Real Mishi Dar) 09:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I don't generally review on request, I did the above as a one-time request. There is a long queue in front of the editors currently. Rest assured, a reviewer will get to it eventually. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

User:The9Man could you please look at Talk:Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series)#Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:41:E6FF:187A:59FA:9620:F683 (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Are you planning on doing the GA review you opened on August 19? It's been over 2 weeks. If you changed your mind, could you undo the template, so someone else can review it?? Thanks. — Maile (talk) 02:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminder. I am going through the same and will close this in 7 days. If that is not okay, you can undo the template. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I can wait 7 days. Thanks for replying. — Maile (talk) 12:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello (The9Man), I created an article about tv actress Rashika Singh page is live on Wikipedia but a tag on top box

showing. I'm not taken any money from her. My friend knows that I usually do Wikipedia edits and he asks me to create a Wikipedia profile for her friend which is a tv actress in tv serials films and shorts films as well. I never take money for Wikipedia profiles. Lets me know how can remove such kind of thing from Wikipedia.

Thank you FMEINDIA ^(Talk)

Hello, I can see that the person who added the tag has been blocked for being a WP:SOCK. If you have no WP:COI or WP:PAID, cleanup the article as per WP:LOP and remove the tag yourself mentioning about your reasoning. - The9Man ^(Talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I’m very confused as to the rejection of my proposed article. I’ve been told in the edit summary that the sources don’t determine notability (point 1 of WP:MUSIC), but I’ve shown his notability under WP:MUSIC, which he passes as he meets point 2 (through the ARIA source, a reputable publication), point 3 (through the ARIA source again) and point 11 (through the link in the edit summary). Given the notability guideline says that they need to meet *one* of the criteria (and he passes three at the least), could you please explain to me why my article has been declined when the subject clearly meets notability standards? I’m a relatively new Wikipedia user and this is only my second article so I’d very much appreciate your input on this. Thanks! ser! (let's discuss it). 14:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

While a subject may be considered notable having a single or album on any country's national music chart to pass the WP:MUSIC, this should be determined by the independent secondary sources as well WP:NRV. The 'number 8' claim is not supported by any of the independent sources. The references we have in this article is basically Primary (ARIA source), passing mention and the rest are interviews. I suggest you improve the article with more WP:RS. - The9Man ^(Talk) 13:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, I thought I had added a reference for it and I've added a reference to the number 8 claim now. I'll have a further look at the article and see if I can improve it further before I re-submit it. All the best! ser! (let's discuss it). 22:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man! I need your help, I did Miss Teen World contributions taking into account press releases and publications made about the contest since 2001, however Ayaat1998 reverted edits, I have read an "alert" and warning, preventing me from continuing with an impartial job that took me a whole day. I belive my contributios are correct, please, help me to cancel this warning and let me to write at Miss Teen World. The official contest emerged in Ecuador in 2001 by its founder Cesar Montece owner of the Queen of Ecuador company who died in 2009 https://www.eluniverso.com/2010/04/01/1/1379/murio-cesar-montece-empresario-belleza.html and for this reason was held as a new pageant under the same name in the US from 2009 to 2012. Due to a legal problem with Miss World he was forced to change the name of the pageant in the US, is called currently Miss Teen Continents. Montece's sister, president of the Queen of Ecuador Inc. company sold all rights to the pageant to Rodrigo Moreira, director of Miss Teen Ecuador in 2012. Montece had more than 20 beauty pageants in Ecuador. The website of that event was http://web.archive.org/web/20031229021751/http://www.queenofecuador.com.ec/ and on the web there are hundreds of referrals that can give you a more clear idea about it. Ayaat1998 is a user with bad intentions, who for some obscure reason asks to delete my user who has contributed neutrally to Wikipedia for many years.-->Jeniferliberman (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jeniferliberman: I am afraid I can't be much of help in this case. WP:ANI is the place where you should raise these kind of concerns. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The article Connie Ma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable tennis player, fails both WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iffy★Chat -- 08:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Iffy: I have removed PROD. I believe her coverages support WP:BASIC and multiple Junior Fed cup wins are notable achievements. I suggest to send it to AfD for more opinions if you think otherwise. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I still believe my rationale for deletion holds, so I have taken it to AFD, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Ma. Iffy★Chat -- 21:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! I noticed that you capitalised prime mininster of Japan on Yoshihide Suga. Just as a note, we don't capitalise titles when they're not immediately before someone's name. For example, Scott Morrison is the prime minister of Australia and Prime Minister Scott Morrison are correct, while "Scott Morrison is the Prime Minister of Australia" etc is wrong. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 02:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man! My name is Go-Tsumaroki, or Tsu. I'm a wikipedia editor like you that is in need of mentor-ship. If you are inetersted in adopting me, just ping me! Go-Tsumaroki (chat) 14:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@Go-Tsumaroki: Before we consider a formal connection, please do tell me what sort of things you have been doing, and what sort you hope/plan to do, and what problems in any you have been having. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@The9Man: I spend most of my time reverting vandalism on all sorts of articles, as I am aiming for reverting privileges. I hope to become the most audacious vandal-reverter on the site, and hopefully reach 10,000 edits before the end of the year. The problems I have currently is just trying to deal with these vandals and that they will understand that what they are doing is wrong.

Sorry for the late reply. I am running very hectic these days and I am afraid I won't be able to give enough time for you. Keep doing good and good luck for another suitable adopter. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amitabh Bachchan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

User:The9Man please look at talk page for Bigg Boss Tamil 1 all needs to be same. Please can you do this as it needs to be the same as other bb articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:D9E4:8920:C1E6:E93D (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

User:The9Man Please could you do this it really needs to be done as all other bb articles have that what I’ve asked in the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:24D4:3E86:B8DF:27F6 (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Replied on the talk page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 12:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Look at the talk page for Bigg Boss Tamil 1 again User:The9Man — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:9419:31BD:8497:9E65 (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I saw you added a notability tag to Win Rosenfeld. I would like to know what I can do to improve it, which bits of information to add or remove. I would love any suggestions on what should be added to the page to make it notable. Cardei012597 (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

@Cardei012597: I see the mentioned references are WP:ROUTINE. I would like to see some significant and independent coverage on the subject to establish the notability. - The9Man ^(Talk) 08:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. I know that but, to be more specific, should there be more information about his personal life or family? I can add independent coverage, but I would like to know if there is something specific about the coverage you wanted. Cardei012597 (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

I am concerned more about the notability part here rather than the additional information. - The9Man ^(Talk) 12:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

His notability does come more from his position as the CEO of Monkeypaw Productions, an Oscar winning company, rather than his television/film credits as producer. If this aspect should be elaborated on, I can do this effectively. If the recent additions to the page have not been viewed, I did briefly start on crafting an "Early life" section, his life before his many collaborations with Jordan Peele. I believe notability can be strengthened on Win Rosenfeld, but I would love to have some insight or suggestions on improving the page. Cardei012597 (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Notability is not inherited. Being the CEO of a company doesn't make him notable automatically. You have to establish it with WP:RS. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I know that, there are reliable, independent third party sources on the page that state he position as CEO. All I want to know is should I add more to elaborate on his position as CEO, on top of the sources already included? If that is indeed the case, I can do that. There are many reliable sources online that state his position as CEO. Cardei012597 (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Amitabh Bachchan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Amitabh Bachchan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 06:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Kindly close the deletion discussion. I changed my vote.TamilMirchi (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@TamilMirchi: Okay, but let it complete the 7 days extension period, just in case if anybody else wants to be involved. - The9Man ^(Talk) 05:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, re: this, please use edit summaries when reverting other editors. Reverting without explaining why is not very helpful to the other editor, who could be learning something about community processes, and it is not conducive to the "community" aspect of this community editing project. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I almost always leave an edit summary whenever it is required and possible [5]. In this particular case I had used the Rollback as the edit was an unexplained vandal by an editor who is consistently doing it for a few days on various pages. I tried to reason with her once [6] but she removed it from the talk page without any explanation. I can see @Vensatry: raised the same concern on their talk page currently. She has done the same here also [7], [8]. Even if we assume good faith in these edits, the unwillingness to learn or understand the policies even after multiple rollbacks and warnings are refractory. Do you still think we should keep reasoning in these conditions? - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for being diligent about using edit summaries. In this instance, however, since I was not aware of your history with the other editor, an edit summary like "User has been deleting images without explanation at various articles" would have helped me understand the rationale for the reversion. My point being: sometimes edit summaries aren't for the person being reverted, sometimes they're for other editors and administrators. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

I understood your concern. But we can't' leave a summary when using the Rollback as far as I know (guide me if I am wrong). The thing I can do is to use the Rollback only in extreme conditions and use undo instead. I will keep this in mind. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man. Thank you for editing my Maurice McGregor draft submission. I printed out the "Happy 100th Birthday, Dr. McGregor!" article and, to my chagrin, found that you are correct that I did not sufficiently paraphrase the original wording of Gillian Woodford. I have fixed that problem now, though I'm not sure how to remove the warning bulletin atop the Maurice McGregor entry.

One question:

Can you fix -- or tell me how to fix -- the sentence I am pasting below from that Wikipedia entry? I had originally intended it to be a "for more information" footnote, but I guess it can be included in the body of the article. But right now it is not showing up correctly in either the body of the article or in the footnote:

The results of McGill's own assessments – of dozens of interventions, from aortic valve bypass to gastric banding to prostate screening – are posted online for free access at The Technology Assessment Unit of McGill University Health Centre, https://muhc.ca/tau/page/links. This site features "Guidelines for Systematic Literature Search," co-authored by McGregor and published in 2013.</ref>

Thank you for your attentive work on editing this article. As a retired writer/editor/journalist, I know how time consuming editing can be! Soccermom22601 (talk) 17:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Soccermom22601: I have fixed the reference part for you. You can also add the same under 'External Links' heading at the end of the article if you wish to. However, you still need to work on the article before removing the warning because a good amount of content still matches with the non-free copyrighted source [9]. - The9Man ^(Talk) 13:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

I've read the relevant Wiki pages on need-to-change advisories on the top of entries, but it remains unclear to me as to how to get this advisory removed above the Maurice McGregor article that I drafted (I've corrected the problem): Soccermom22601 (talk) 00:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

This article or section contains close paraphrasing of a non-free copyrighted source, https://publications.mcgill.ca/medenews/2020/03/27/happy-100th-birthday-dr-mcgregor/. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Ideas in this article should be expressed in an original manner. (October 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

I just saw your message in which you reasserted that I was basically plagiarizing an article published by McGill University. I actually printed out the reference article in question and compared it line-for-line with my revised version. Obviously, some of the facts are the same -- I mean, both articles point out that Maurice McGregor went straight from medical school into military service in Italy in 1942. But this fact can be gleaned from McGregor's online CV. I don't agree that the wording fails to be paraphrased in my latest version. For instance, there are only so many ways that one can describe in a few words the conflicts surrounding the end of apartheid in South Africa and McGregor's university role during that period. I hold a Doctor of Letters and spent 40 years as an editor on newspapers and with several universities, so I do understand "paraphrasing." I hope you will reconsider your stance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccermom22601 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Apologies for forgetting to sign the four tildes. I did find my way to the Earwig's Copyvio Detector. I found the following, which pertained entirely to a direct quote from something written and published by Maurice McGregor, which I put in italics (should I have done this some other way?) as the reason for flagging my supposed copyright violation. Here is what I am referring to:

Maurice McGregor Violation Unlikely 37.9% confidence macleans.ca/opinion/the-snc-lavalin-saga-aarggh-enough-already

In May 2019, at the age of 99, McGregor penned a letter to Canada’s leading news magazine, Maclean’s, in rebuttal of an essay that rationalized cheating. McGregor wrote: [I BEGAN THE ITALICS HERE] Without a commitment to live by shared ethical values, society will just not work. Ethics matter immensely (“I cheat for my kids. So do you,” Parenting, May 2019). We should not cheat for our kids unless we want them to grow up believing that is how the world works, and if enough people believe that is how it works, that is how it will work.[I ENDED THE ITALICS HERE]

As for the other supposed problems with not paraphrasing from publications.mcgill.ca/medenews/2020/03/27/happy-100th-birthday-dr-mcgregor, the software often detected the same or similar usage of official (and longish) French names of an organism (Conseil d’évaluation des technologies de la santé du Québec), or the same usage of the longish name of McGregor's university -- e.g., medical school at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Or a piece of medical technology described in the same manner in both articles -- e.g., clinically useful whole body oximeters. Or an official position he held -- e.g., founding chair of the Technology Assessment Unit. Surely, it would be absurd to require paraphrasing in such cases.Soccermom22601 (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Just as a note, you are not an administrator. Thus, you cannot see the deleted version(s) of pages that have been nominated for G4 deletion. Please do not remove G4 tags. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay. I thought it is okay for any editor to remove G4 if pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies. Won't be touching those things hereon. - The9Man ^(Talk) 08:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Never mind my SoccerMom22601 comments above. I figured out how to fix everything. Thanks for your editing efforts and patience with newbies.Soccermom22601 (talk) 14:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Great. - The9Man ^(Talk) 08:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man, May i please know as to why you marked Geeta Shakya as unreviewed? As per NPP, we need to mark AFDed pages as reviewed after tagging them.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

@Umakant Bhalerao: even though you 'can' mark it as reviewed, it is better to not mark as reviewed if it has a higher chance of Delete outcome since it allows the search engines to index the page [10].
I thought you might have done it mistakenly. You can mark it again if it was intentional. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

I think there is a slight confusion here. New pages that are AFDed and marked as reviewed do not get crawled or indexed by search engines as they have the NOINDEX template which prevents search engines from crawling those pages. By the way, I did not mark the above page as patrolled myself. It was automatically marked as reviewed. I have been observing over the last few days that articles that have been AFDed are automatically being marked as reviewed whereas, earlier, we had to manually do it.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

I just saw that Twinkle is doing it automatically now. Sorry for the confusion. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your move request regarding the page Casey Calvert! What do you think of my research and improvements to the page during a recent deletion discussion, compare before with after? Thank you, Right cite (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I can see some hard work to improve the article. Keep doing it. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man,

Thank you for your update on the Draft: Crystal Johnson (singer) article. It appears that the article was previously on wikipedia for about a decade before improvements were made. Is there a reason why many actual documented references have been added, yet would cause disqualification at this time? I have read several of the wikipedia help pages, as well as formatting it the way other accepted articles have been written and I am trying to understand the rationale. The artist has had a fairly long career in entertainment, in a variety of noted areas. Any guidance you can give to assist with restoration would be most appreciated. Thank you! musiklova67 Musiklova67 (talk) 09:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Seventeenth Legislative Assembly of Bihar, does not have enough infromation as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

please reply why u delete my edit. That was my work on sanjeev tyagi. can u tell a reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vansh tyagi24 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello The9Man,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I wrote a new article on Cavoodles and you seem to have deleted this. I'm not sure why it was well illustrated with a picture example of the breed plus it contained reference to popular culture referencing the dog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minisini (talk • contribs) 01:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the content you created wasn't sufficiently notable to have its own article. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi The9Man, I have finished the review of Amitabh_Bachchan and put it on hold. See Talk:Amitabh_Bachchan/GA2#GA_review_(2) for full details. Let me know if you intend to work on it or if you wish me to close the review. Regards SilkTork (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Amitabh Bachchan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Amitabh Bachchan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Ha, I am opted out of these bot messages, but because the GA is under Lazman's name, it still delivers them! I'm here to say that I have closed the review as you requested. I assume that the bot will be along at some point to say the same thing! Anyway. Keep editing and keep happy! SilkTork (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Amitabh Bachchan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Amitabh Bachchan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lazman321 -- Lazman321 (talk) 11:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! -- Pratyush.shrivastava (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the New Year cheer by adding ((subst:New Year 2)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

Can you please explain your rationale for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitto (singer) as keep? Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

That was a technical mistake. It is already a G7. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Chrissy Teigen and Talk:Donald Gary Young on "Biographies" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I am looking for an adopter. I would like to learn more in wikipedia. I'd also like to do articles about the Philippines. Please do leave a message in my talk page. Thank you. --Kurigo (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I am not very active these days in Wikipedia and it will remain the same for at least another month. Please look for somebody else. Thank you for reaching to me. - The9Man ^(Talk) 13:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tom Brady on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Quotation Gang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Enrique Tarrio on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tom Aikens on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lorene Scafaria on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

• When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
• Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

• A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

Hello, The9Man. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seventeenth Legislative Assembly of Bihar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
• The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

• The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

Hello, The9Man. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seventeenth Legislative Assembly of Bihar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Devoleena Bhattacharjee in the source give here [11] it says she was 26 in 2016 that means her birth was 1990 why did you revert it. It was not vandalism at all.

This is already discussed on the talk page with relevant sources. If you would like to see it changed, prove your points at the talk page. You can't change it without consensus. - The9Man ^(Talk) 19:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi I have tagged you in Devoleena Bhattacharjee talk page regarding wrong dob correction User:The9Man please look in talk page of Devoleena about wrong year of her birth it’s important and needs to be changed.

You have renamed the page TVF Aspirants to Aspirants (web series) stating the reason TVF is its Production company.

FYI Have you ever visited the page TVF Tripling or TVF Pitchers they all are the Web series by The Viral Fever. They mostly plug in their brand in their shows. So kindly visit these pages and verify and edit it. Jogesh 69 (talk) 08:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

No, I didn't consider those pages, in fact, I suggest changing them as well. We don't need to follow the article naming from a branding perspective or do what the brand wants to show. You can see the poster itself to see the name of the show, it is 'Aspirants'. If you still have a different opinion, please start a discussion on the article talk page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 09:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in getting my page on the Toronto Clarion published! Anne9853 (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Administrator I have revised this page Draft:M. Rezaul Hassan As youmention about advert type keywords and sentences. Kindly review it . I don't know why this draft is also marked as speedy deletation . This person really exist and has a good value in the field of Bangladeshi Business . I have added neutral sources . If this is not enough please let me know. Thank you ! MdEhsanulHaqueTanvir (talk) 06:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Can you right article I have proof about one guy

Please Poshan037 (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

@Poshan037: I don't get you. Are you talking about references? Who's the guy? - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey there! I'm NixV. I'm new to Wikipedia, and I'm loving it here so far. I stumbled across the Adopt-a-user page and noticed that you were listed as currently accepting adoptees, so I decided to get in touch.

I'm interested in becoming a better editor by gaining experience in editing across a broader range of topics and drafting and creating new articles. I'd also like to get involved with more back-end work on Wikipedia.

Articles I'm currently editing and working on are mostly related to top-flight sailing (see F50 and SailGP), but in the future I'd love to edit and create articles on other topics as well.

I should be quite active over the next few months as I'm currently on a summer break from my studies.

It would be absolutely great if you could help! :) NixV (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

NixV, Welcome to Wikipedia! By seeing your edits so far I believe you can be a great asset to the project. I will be happy to assist you in this journey.
I will set up your adoption school page in a day or two and we can start from there. Meanwhile, you can ask me questions on my talk page at any time if you have queries. - The9Man ^(Talk) 17:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks The9Man! I’m really looking forward to getting started and learning more! :) NixV (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC) NixV (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

• Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
• Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news

• Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

• After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Administrator changes Trialpears AGK • Eliz81 • Mulad • ThaddeusB • Vianello • Who Lacrimosus → Ikuzaf Interface administrator changes Ragesoss

CheckUser changes AGK • DGG Oversighter changes AGK

Guideline and policy news

• Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
• An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

• IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration

• The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.

Hello The9Man:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Narendra Modi on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Presidents on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Criticism of political correctness on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ricky Schroder on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Administrator changes BusterD Kees08 • Nickshanks • Protonk • Schissel • Ultraexactzz • Wknight94

CheckUser changes TheresNoTime Oversighter changes TheresNoTime ST47

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

• Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

• Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.

Miscellaneous

• You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WazirX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WazirX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olaf Carlson-Wee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olaf Carlson-Wee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Cobley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Cobley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, The9Man

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alshair Fiyaz for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alshair Fiyaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alshair Fiyaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Natalie Portman on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of newspapers in Kerala. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#List of newspapers in Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Because I do changes after research and continuously watching series "Anupamaa" since beginning and keeping a update on it's original version "Sreemoyee". There also Sreemoyee (Anupamaa) bears protagonist, Anindya, Rohit(Vanraj, Anuj) male lead, June(Kavya) antagonist, Pratyush aka Dinka (Samar) 2nd male lead, Ankita, Arna(Kinjal, Nandini) 2nd female lead tags. And they all are placed under main cast category because they are pillars of show and Rohit's character is placed at the last of main cast and so is Anuj. And actor Gaurav Khanna might have started shooting or will shoot from next week. Don't remove reference and term of character from his name. And please don't remove plot also. Because as a regular viewer of show I update it. I don't do test edits. I do actual edits which are necessary to update as the story and characters developed in the span of 1 year Pra2310 (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Pra2310, I appreciate your love for the show and your efforts to keep it updated. However, Wikipedia has certain policies and guidelines in place about what information allows on the site. In this case, WP:CASTLIST clearly defines 'Interpretations in the form of labels (e.g. protagonist, antagonist, villain, main character) should be avoided'. Please make your changes align with the policies. - The9Man ^(Talk) 10:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

ok. I have a request to you. Can you assist me in making article for Anagha Bhosale and Nidhi Shah aka Nandini and Kinjal? Pra2310 (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

And please help me in uploading image to someone's wikipedia. Pra2310 (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Emma Watson on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes

Jake Wartenberg

Emperor • Viridian Bovary

Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

Guideline and policy news

• Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
• A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
• A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
• A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.

Technical news

• The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration

• A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.

Miscellaneous

• The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.

Hello The9Man,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Though I understand that it's not necessary to keep each and every scene in plot section. But atleast keep necessary events. And story of parallel leads also. A story can't run only due to protagonist, lead and negative leads. Parallel leads story is equally important. So atleast don't remove necessary events from their story or add separate section for parallel story arcs. Like in Yrkkh. In Anupamaa the protagonist is incomplete without parallel leads Samar, Nandini and Kinjal. So please don't remove my changes again from both plot as well as cast section Pra2310 (talk) 11:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)