|
Welcome!
Hello, TheFeds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme))
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the input. I believe that I have revised the article to be well written & wiki appropriate now.Tallulah13 (talk) 19:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Notify users.
Template:Reqphotoin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Tim Pierce (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! Multiple editions aren't vandalim! It's my ISP fault!--69.149.204.113 (talk) 03:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Please be careful when using Huggle not to delete constructive edits like you did here. AstroMark (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I edited your change to WP:MOSNUM regarding large numbers, to show that when commas are used as the grouping character, they are only used to the left of the decimal point, not to the right. I believe you will find this is the advise given in most printed style guides. Also, I started a discussion to bring this change to editor's attention. --Jc3s5h (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandalism revert. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
please put my thing back how it was. It's common sense and I've heard a few highschool football coaches in Arkansas say it. If you don't like "best of all time" then "one of the best" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjabike matt (talk • contribs) 23:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Geographically speaking, Arkansas ranks sixth in the western division of the SEC for overall recruiting base.[citation needed] This, coupled with a 42-38 conference record over 10 years[citation needed] lead many sports historians[who?] to believe Nutt is the best NCAA coach of all time[citation needed].
Hi. I just wanted to note to you that I'm reverting your edits to the leads of these lists. The first paragraphs of these lists are what is known as "boilerplate text". These lists are going to eventually be part of a featured topic, and it's common for lists with a common theme or thread to start in the same way. For an example, see the Silver Slugger Award winners lists. If you have any questions, you can ask me at my talk page. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
you didnt need to unedit the page i was about to change it back foolio!! it was a like joke on a friend call luther burger! get a life! Jeez!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.68.192 (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello TheFeds, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged (Tayo Ogidan) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! SoWhy 13:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I thought your answer at the Village Pump (policy) regarding calculations was insightful and am hoping you could weigh in at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding the use of calculation software regarding Erdos-Bacon numbers (I'm not all that aware on the specifics). No matter what side you take in that discussion at least it might make everyone think a little harder, as emotions of "I'm right your wrong" are taking over instead of insightful discussion.Camelbinky (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello TheFeds, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Patrick Bertoletti has been removed. It was removed by EncycloPetey with the following edit summary '(deprod - The subject of the article is a top competitor; poor article quality is not in itself a reason for deletion)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with EncycloPetey before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
TheFeds, please see my 17:42, 18 August 2009 post on WT:MOSNUM. I agree; I think your version of that section was better. Greg L (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
FYI as you've recently edited the article Goldstream, British Columbia, and an IP keeps adding an unsourced story. Rosiestep (talk) 00:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
≈ Chamal talk ¤ 20:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, an RfC is now open for your comments on this issue at Wikipedia:Mosnum/proposal on YYYY-MM-DD numerical dates. -- Alarics (talk) 09:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
What personal attack User:Gengarblood3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gengarblood3 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you had initially PROD'd creative inspiration at one point. I thought I should let you know that the article is currently under discussion for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative inspiration. Singularity42 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Feds! I was posting a comment to User talk:2007693492WONG09 regarding his blanking of Aberdeen floating village apparently at the same time as you were posting your comment. Because you and I were posting to two different sections, it did not create an edit conflict. However, you may wish to look at my comments to see if I have complicated in any way that which you were trying to convey to the editor. By the way, I am not entirely sure that s/he reads his/her talk page since there has been no response to postings there … so far. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 07:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I was completely unaware of the stuff that you mentioned in your post to his talk page. I only saw the page blanking in Aberdeen floating village because it showed up in my Huggle screen. How were you made aware of the copy and paste operations? — SpikeToronto 07:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
hello, I am a student of cvr college of Engineering and the page I created for cvr is : cvr college of engineering
I have taken all permissions from the chairman/principal/governing council to create a page in Wikipedia to use our college images in the page directly for our web-siteAs I am not familiar using Wikipedia I need some help I have given most of the content that i can give but Wikipedia shows "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2009)
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can.
This article may not meet the notability guidelines for companies and organizations. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged or deleted. "
I kindly request you to have some thing done to not display these lines as I have done what I can,If possible please try to improve my article so that it does not show these lines,you can use data from The official college web-site ,I have taken all permission from our chairman.
Thanks in advance (Megaposiedon (talk) 12:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC))
Allied Artists International and Senior Abuse of a 93 year old, computer illiterate man at Wikipedia
An article that you have been involved in editing, Allied Artists International, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Artists International. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Your comment about the hidden text, Comments not related to AfD issues (by 75.84.158.222, ChinaUser and 99.166.95.142) are hidden below. appears incorrect. It looks to me as if 99.166.95.142's is very much about the AfC. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry Accusation, Major Fraud at Wikipedia, just like in the Federal Conviciotns using the same methods
Kim Richards, CEO of Allied Artists International, by WarriorBoy85’s own original edit of his side bar, is one and the same as Kimball Dean Richards, who was named, indicted, and convicted of Major Fraud using these names and associated names.
Look HERE [7]. You will see Allied Artists Pictures Corporation, the REAL movie company STILL EXISTS.
Can you turn on your email, even if temporarily, so you can email me? It's very important. Thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Please assist with accuracy regarding the Kimball Dean Richards article, which is in construction on the article's talk page. Thanx.ChinaUpdater (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi TheFeds, at the AfD for Saltine cracker challenge you commented "Delete ... It's not notable enough in its own right, though. (At best, find sources and include in an appropriate article.)". I've since improved the article to the point where I think it addresses your concerns; there are sources demonstrating notability, and there is enough material already for the article to stand alone. I'll appreciate it if you revisit your recommendation on the AfD and update it as you feel appropriate. Thanks, Melchoir (talk) 10:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
If you have the time, could I have your view on this? I'm reckoning the documentary will be reliable, what are your thoughts? Thanks, - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
(Discussion centralized at User talk:Mion#HCNG in see also sections. TheFeds 20:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC))
![]() |
User:TheFeds has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't really like the new, small version of this template (nothing wrong with the way you did it, you did excellent work, it's just my personal preference); is there some parameter that can be added to have it display as the old-style one instead of the new one? (The edit summary "small by default" seemed to imply there is.) Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
small=no
to it (but it also understands large=yes
). TheFeds 03:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Nice work. --John (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Please cite that Vanir Energy, not Enerworks installed the system at Fletcher Business Park. Installing and supplying collectors are two very different things. Maybe you can cite Enerworks as supplying collectors for the largest install. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Midland3211 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
It seems you are using an older version of AWB. There are critical bugs to 4.9.0.2. Please update to version 4.9.0.3 by downloaing a snapshot from http://toolserver.org/%7Eawb/snapshots Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 01:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for help and information about image uploading for Bhaurao Patil. Sincerely, Shivashree (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointer. I've left a comment at the user's talk page; would you be willing to try to help with this situation if necessary? Nyttend (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Chiropractic controversy and criticism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiropractic controversy and criticism. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – I am notifying you because you participated in the original AfD. DigitalC (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
((tb)) GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:24, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On May 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Friction stir processing, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I like the changes that you made to the Tea Party movement page. However, I have a feeling they will be reversed shortly. Hang around there more often!
Regards, Chicopadilla —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicopadilla (talk • contribs) 06:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Heliodor Píka at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Allen3 talk 23:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On May 31, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Heliodor Píka, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding your request at WP:REFUND#User talk:CWii, please see my reply there. Is there something specific that you are looking for that I can help you find short of restoring the page? The user in question is currently under 18, so I'm extremely hesitant to restore the page unless absolutely necessary. I don't see any evidence of why it was deleted (in other words, I don't see a public request), but if the user had emailed Tanthalas39 privately, I doubt he/she is going to be much help. Tanthalas39 committed the cardinal sin of a self-unblock and was indefblocked shortly thereafter. I haven't closed the request – another admin might look at it and feel differently – but I just have a strong preference to preserve a user or former user's privacy, particularly when they are underage. --B (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Please see the Template talk:Val#Val is now screwed up. There have been one or more recent edits that totally fouled up the function of the ((val)) template. Greg L (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Update User:Martin fixed the spacing issue but left the issue of having a single hanging digit to between me and User:Verdy p. At User talk:Verdy p#Val template, you will see my response to him. But in a nutshell, he is way-wrong on this and I hope you keep an eye on how things progress on the Template talk:Val#Val is now screwed up-page. In a nutshell, my response to Verdy p was as follows:
Please see Template talk:Val is now screwed up. In a nutshell, the BIPM and the NIST and every other standards organization uses a last group of four digits so as to never leave a single hanging digit. By wide consensus, Wikipedia follows that practice and does not want a house style that flouts international conventions. Links are provided on the page.
Greg L (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
You're welcome to comment. -- Brangifer (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
(Discussion centralized at User talk:Bzuk#Avro Arrow pictures. TheFeds 04:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
HeyBzuk (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding ((subst:User:HJ Mitchell/WikiScotch)) to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Seems you were involved in the ChinaUpdate/WarriorBoy dispute back in 2009 over the Richard Rooks/Kimball Dean Richard disputes around Allied Artists Pictures/Allied Artists International. It's back, kind of. Would you mind giving a look or a quick overview? Cheers, Ocaasi c 20:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
Hi. When you recently edited Mercedes 35 hp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Having previously been involved in a discussion about Ancestry.com on RSN, could you join a discussion here to offer your opinion? A user is saying that some of the material on that site is not from users, but paid employees, and WP:BLPPRIMARY is also an issue. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 09:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
You removed an edit notice from the tropical year, saying that it was a malformed edit notice being used as a cleanup tag. I have restored the edit notice because I don't understand your edit summary.
I do notice that the template isn't actually producing an edit notice, but I believe that was the intent, and I suggest you ask on the talk page of the template for it to be fixed. If no one knows how or no one is interested, I would then suggest you put it up for deletion. I believe if the template were working properly it would be useful. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
/Editnotice
. (For example, check out the editnotice on my talk page; it has a link labelled "Page notice" to the page that generates it.) But yes, an administrator is needed to make it work, presumably to avoid people putting random garish editnotices everywhere.My impression of the tag was that it was being used like something from WP:TC, but with an incorrect template for the job. The cleanup templates are (at least in principle) temporary, and would be removed once the issue is resolved. The item in question was worded as a permanent notice. I said the editnotice template transclusion is malformed because it's not generating an editnotice—but more to the point, the place it's been inserted is the problem, rather than an issue with the template code itself. TheFeds 08:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Van Heuvelen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huron High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
-- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 08:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I made further replies at the technical village pump. Best. (Feel free to remove these messages after you've seen them). -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 09:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 27 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harold Van Heuvelen, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although Colonel Harold Van Heuvelen composed his Symphony No. 1 during World War II, it was only premiered in 2012? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Van Heuvelen. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Harold Van Heuvelen, TheFeds!
Wikipedia editor Modern.Jewelry.Historian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Congrats
To reply, leave a comment on Modern.Jewelry.Historian's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please see response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.102.53 (talk) 06:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Moved from my user page. TheFeds 20:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huronia Regional Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar Springs, Ontario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 3 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Huronia Regional Centre, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that patients of the overcrowded Huronia Regional Centre were subjected to years of "despairing conditions", and in some cases, abuse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Huronia Regional Centre. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, TheFeds, and thank you for your contributions!
Some text in an article that you worked on List of mayors of Old Toronto, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, List of mayors of Toronto. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on List of mayors of Old Toronto at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You have been mentioned at ANI in section Long-term copyright concerns: User:Light show. Your participation would be very welcome there. Please note that with current archive practices it will archive after 36 hours of inactivity. After its archival, the conversation will be found at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive861 or later. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, TheFeds. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, TheFeds. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TheFeds. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello TheFeds! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
Current signature:
<font style="font-family:Constantia" size="3" color="#0077bb">[[User:TheFeds|'''''TheFeds''''']]</font>
Fixed signature:
[[User:TheFeds|<span style="font-family:Constantia; color=#0077bb; font-size:medium;">'''''TheFeds'''''</span>]]
More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Multiple transclusion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Military journalist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 16#Military journalist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi! Would it be possible for you to add
/* <nowiki> */
to the top and
/* </nowiki> */
to the bottom of User:TheFeds/script/editadvisor.js? By putting these tags inside of javascript comments, it won't impact the functionality of your script, but it will keep the backend software from transcluding Template:Futher. You will know if the tags worked if Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Futher no longer shows your javascript page. By fixing these, we can keep the number of entries in Special:WantedTemplates to a minimum. Thank you in advance for your help! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
I have proposed moving the page Letters Patent (United Kingdom) to Letters patent (United Kingdom), and have opened a discussion at Talk:Letters Patent (United Kingdom)#Requested move 20 May 2022 where comments in support or opposition may be made. As you have previously commented on the naming of the page, I invite your input.
Mauls (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)