Briggs v. Elliott
Decided January 28, 1952
Full case nameHarry Briggs, Jr. et al. v. R.W. Elliott, chairman, et al.
Citations342 U.S. 350 (more)
72 S. Ct. 327; 96 L. Ed. 2d 392; 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2486
Case history
Prior
  • June 23, 1951: Injunction to abolish segregation denied, injunction to equalize educational facilities granted (2–1), 98 F. Supp. 529 (E.D.S.C. 1951)
Subsequent
  • March 13, 1952: Judgment reinstated (3–0), 103 F. Supp. 920 (E.D.S.C. 1952)
  • May 17, 1954: Reversed and remanded (9–0), sub. nom., Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
  • July 15, 1955: Decree entered, voiding South Carolina school segregation law as unconstitutional, and ordering schools integrated with all deliberate speed consistent with Brown (3-0), 132 F. Supp. 776 (E.D.S.C. 1955)
Holding
In order that the Supreme Court may have the benefit of the views of the district court upon the additional facts brought out in the appellees report on the implementation of district court's mandate to equalize segregated South Carolina schools, and that the district court may have the opportunity to take whatever action it may deem appropriate in light of that report, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Fred M. Vinson
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinions
Per curiam
DissentBlack, joined by Douglas
Laws applied
28 U.S.C. (Supp. IV) § 1253, S.C. Const., Art. XI, § 7; S.C. Code § 5377 (1942)

Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952), on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, challenged school segregation in Summerton, South Carolina.[1] It was the first of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education (1954),[2] the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional by violating the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Following the Brown decision, the district court issued a decree that struck down the school segregation law in South Carolina as unconstitutional and required the state's schools to integrate. Harry and Eliza Briggs, Reverend Joseph A. De Laine, and Levi Pearson were awarded Congressional Gold Medals posthumously in 2003.[3]

Background

Educational segregation in the US prior to Brown
Educational segregation in the US prior to Brown

The case began in 1947 when Levi Pearson wrote a letter to the Clarendon County School District requesting that black children be provided with the same bus transportation that white children in the district received:[4]

"A Petition on behalf of my children and all other school children in School District #26, Clarendon County, South Carolina, was mailed to you, since that date I have had no communication from you with regard to this petition nor has any efforts been made to furnish bus transportation to Negroes in this School District. Please advise me if efforts are being made to furnish school bus transportation."

— Levi Pearson, October 1, 1947

Prior to Pearson's letter, the school board reserved all of its 30 buses for white children which meant that Pearson's children had a 9-mile journey, one-way, to attend the nearest black school.[5] The black children of Clarendon County had harsh conditions to traverse to attend school, including rowing paddle boats to cross bodies of water.[6] In the neighboring Jordan community, some children walked a total of up to 16 miles to and from school each day,[7] and children had to frequently gather wood for heaters within schools.[8] Levi, his brother, Hammett Pearson, and neighbor Joseph Lemon raised $700 to buy the local children a used school bus to use ($8,336 in today dollars),[9] but frequent maintenance led them to ask the local school superintendent, R.M. Elliott, for their own bus.[10] Elliott refused by saying black citizens did not pay enough taxes to warrant a bus and that asking white taxpayers to fund that burden would be unfair.[10][11]

In the 1940s in Clarendon County white children attended schools with a teacher for every grade, class sizes no higher than 30 students, brick schools with heat, indoor toilets that flushed, water fountains, textbooks, gyms and auditoriums and libraries.[12] Black children attended school in abandoned hunting or Masonic lodges and drafty cabins adjacent to churches. Their parents paid tuition and book rent for textbooks that were discarded from white schools. The black children brought coal or wood to burn in oil drums. They dug and used privies. They toted water from wells. One first grade teacher in Summerton handled 67 students; a second grade teacher dealt with 79.[12]

To advance his efforts for safe transportation for black children, Pearson retained attorney Harold Boulware and rising NAACP star Thurgood Marshall.[13] Thurgood Marshall argued that, since the local school board already provided bus transportation for white students, the county was in violation of the United States Supreme Court's “separate but equal” decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case.[14] The case, which was brought against Clarendon County District 26 on behalf of Pearson's son James, met with immediate resistance. As a result of his lawsuit, Pearson v. Clarendon County, Levi Pearson suffered from acts of domestic terror, such as gun shots fired into his home, as well as economic consequences: local banks refused to provide him with credit to purchase farming materials and area farmers refused to lend him equipment.[15]

In 1948, Pearson v. Clarendon County was dismissed on a technicality when the superintendent noted that Pearson's property straddled district lines.[16] When Levi Pearson's brother, Hammett Pearson, learned of the issue, he offered to replace his brother in the lawsuit.[17]

The rejection of Pearson v. Clarendon County caused the NAACP attorneys to pivot and raise their target to complete desegregation.[12] In 1949, the NAACP agreed to provide funding and sponsor a case that would go beyond transportation and ask for equal educational opportunities in Clarendon County. The first step was to craft a local petition for educational equality. This was done by Rev. Joseph Armstrong DeLaine and Modjeska Monteith Simkins, the noted South Carolina civil rights worker. Simkins organized a national charitable effort for the relief of the oppressed African Americans of Clarendon County. Eventually, more than 100 Clarendon residents signed the petition.

Named first in the suit, Harry Briggs, a service station attendant, and Eliza Briggs, a maid, became the main named plaintiffs. Elliott was named the defendant.

When Brown reached the U.S. Supreme Court, South Carolina was one of seventeen states that required school segregation. State law required complete segregation; Article 11, Section 7 of the 1896 Constitution of South Carolina read as follows: "Separate schools shall be provided for children of the white and colored races, and no child of either race shall ever be permitted to attend a school provided for children of the other race." Section 5377 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina of 1942 read: "It shall be unlawful for pupils of one race to attend the schools provided by boards of trustees for persons of another race."

There was little debate about if the Clarendon County schools were unequal. At the beginning of the hearings in U.S. District Court, the defendants shared on the record that "the educational facilities, equipment, curricula and opportunities afforded in School District No. 22 for colored pupils are not substantially equal to those afforded for white pupils."

Letter sent by Levi Pearson to the Clarendon County School District, requesting that black children be provided with the same bus transportation that white children in the district received.
Letter sent by Levi Pearson to the Clarendon County School District, requesting that black children be provided with the same bus transportation that white children in the district received.

Proceedings

The case would ordinarily have come up before Judge Julius Waring of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina. However, Judge Waring recommended[citation needed] to Thurgood Marshall for the case to be expanded from an equalization case into a desegregation case. Instead of asking for enforcement of the separate but equal doctrine by bringing the African American schools up to equality with the white schools, the plaintiffs asked for school segregation to be declared unconstitutional.

By expanding the case, both Waring and Marshall expected the plaintiffs to lose the case 2—1 and for the case to end up in the U.S. Supreme Court.[18] As predicted, a three-judge panel found segregation lawful by a vote of 2–1, with Judge Waring writing a dissent in which he stated that "segregation is per se inequality."[19][20] The panel also granted an injunction to equalize the uncontested inferiority of the schools used by African American students.

Originally litigated by NAACP lawyer Robert L. Carter, the Briggs case was notable for introducing into evidence the experiments of Kenneth and Mamie Clark, who used dolls to study children's attitudes about race. Under tests performed by Clark, African American students in segregated schools were shown a white doll and an African American doll and asked which one they preferred. When most African American students indicated their preference for the white doll, Clark concluded that segregated schooling decreased African American self-esteem.

Decision

In 1952, the Supreme Court heard the case and returned it to the district court for rehearing after Clarendon County school officials had sent a report on progress in making facilities equal. In March, the district court again heard the case. The Court found that progress had been made towards equality. Thurgood Marshall argued that it may be true, but the real issue was that as long as separation existed, the schools would be unequal. The case was appealed back to the Supreme Court in May. The case was then consolidated with several other school desegregation cases into Brown v. Board of Education.[2]

Briggs was the first of the five Brown cases to be argued before the Supreme Court. Spottswood Robinson and Thurgood Marshall argued the case for the plaintiffs, and former Solicitor General and presidential candidate John W. Davis led the argument for the defense.

Following the Brown decision, the lower court complied with the mandate issued by the Supreme Court and declared the South Carolina school segregation law to be unconstitutional.[21]

Aftermath

2003 Brown et al. v. the Board of Education of Topeka et al. Congressional Gold Medal
2003 Brown et al. v. the Board of Education of Topeka et al. Congressional Gold Medal

Although Brown resulted in a legal victory against segregation, it was a costly victory for those associated with Briggs. Reverend Joseph DeLaine, the generally acknowledged leader of Summerton's African-Americans, was fired from his post at a local school in Silver. His wife, Mattie, was also fired from her position at Scott's Branch, as were all of the other signatories. De Laine's church was burned, and he moved to Buffalo, New York in 1955 after he had survived an attempted drive-by shooting. Both Harry and Eliza Briggs, on behalf of whose children the suit was filed, lost their jobs. Harry spent more than a decade working in Florida to support the family. Eliza eventually joined her children in New York.

Judge Waring had already been shunned by the white community in Charleston and subjected to attacks for previous decisions favorable to equal rights.[22] After his dissent in the three-judge panel, he retired in 1952 and moved to New York.[23][24]

Eventually, the state of South Carolina awarded Eliza Briggs its highest civilian honor, the Order of the Palmetto. Reverend Joseph A. De Laine, Harry and Eliza Briggs, and Levi Pearson were awarded Congressional Gold Medals posthumously in 2003.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952). Public domain This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.
  2. ^ a b Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
  3. ^ a b 108th Congress: Public Law 108-180
  4. ^ "Letter, 1947 October 1, Levi Pearson to Vander Stukes". digital.tcl.sc.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  5. ^ Bay, Mia (2002-10-06). "A Dream Deferred". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-02-08.
  6. ^ "Essay, n.d., Prelude to Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine's Opposition, Joseph A. De Laine, Sr". digital.tcl.sc.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  7. ^ "Brown Case - Briggs v. Elliott | Brown Foundation". brownvboard.org. Retrieved 2017-07-10.
  8. ^ Baker, Robert J. Jordan Elementary School an empty, silent testament to unequal school facilities. "The Item. Feb. 23, 2011.
  9. ^ "Timeline: Briggs v. Elliott, 1946-1971". Stories of Struggle. Retrieved 2022-02-08.
  10. ^ a b Baker, Robert J. Briggs v. Elliott: Summerton schools still mostly segregated. Archived March 2, 2011, at the Wayback Machine "The Item." Feb. 23, 2011,
  11. ^ T. Woods, The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History, p. 196
  12. ^ a b c March 23; Brinson, 2021 | Claudia Smith. "Briggs v. Elliott brought us Brown v. Board of Education. Here's how. | American Experience | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2022-02-08.
  13. ^ March 23; Brinson, 2021 | Claudia Smith. "Briggs v. Elliott brought us Brown v. Board of Education. Here's how. | American Experience | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  14. ^ White, John W. (2006). "MANAGED COMPLIANCE: WHITE RESISTANCE AND DESEGREGATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA, 1950-1970" (PDF).
  15. ^ www.govinfo.gov https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-108hr3287enr/html/BILLS-108hr3287enr.htm. Retrieved 2022-02-08. ((cite web)): Missing or empty |title= (help)
  16. ^ "Letter, 1948 Apr. 9, (Summerton, S.C.), Joseph A. De Laine, Sr., to [Harold R.] Boulware, [Columbia, S.C.]". digital.tcl.sc.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  17. ^ "Letter, 1948 Apr. 9, (Summerton, S.C.), Joseph A. De Laine, Sr., to [Harold R.] Boulware, [Columbia, S.C.]". digital.tcl.sc.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
  18. ^ "Oral History Interview with Alexander M. Rivera". Southern Oral History Program Collection. University of North Carolina. November 30, 2001. He said the judge said, 'Yes, you are. You're going to lose in the three-judge court. You'll get two votes against one in the three-judge court. Then you're automatically in the Supreme Court, and he said, 'That's where you want to be.'
  19. ^ Briggs v. Elliott, 98 F. Supp. 529 (E.D.S.C. 1951).
  20. ^ "Bitter Resistance: Clarendon County, South Carolina". Separate is Not Equal. National Museum of American History. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  21. ^ Briggs v. Elliott, 132 F. Supp. 776 (E.D.S.C. 1955).
  22. ^ "How The Son Of A Confederate Soldier Became A Civil Rights Hero". April 10, 2014. That decision was the catalyst for attacks on Judge Waring so intense that he required 24-hour security. Crosses were burned in his yard. Rocks were thrown through his windows. Waring was alienated from most white Charleston. A local magazine described him as the most lonesome man in town.
  23. ^ "Charleston U.S. Justice Center Renamed for Pioneering Civil Rights Judge Julius Waties Waring". GSA. October 2, 2015. Waring’s challenges to the racially discriminatory practices of that era came at great personal expense, as he and his family were vilified and received constant death threats. Waring retired from the bench in 1952 and moved to New York City, where he died on January 11, 1968, at age 87.
  24. ^ Rosen, Robert N. (April 10, 2014). "Judge J. Waties Waring: Charleston's inside agitator". The Post and Courier. Archived from the original on November 29, 2015. Waring retired from the bench after the Briggs case and moved to New York with his wife. On the night of the Brown decision, Walter White, the president of the NAACP, and other civil rights leaders in New York headed not for the NAACP headquarters, but Judge Waring's apartment on Fifth Avenue.

Further reading