|
Get personal technical help at the Teahouse, help desk, village pump (technical), talk pages or IRC. | |
General technical help | |
Special page-related | |
Wikitext | |
Links and diffs | |
Media files: images, videos and sounds | |
Other graphics | |
Templates and Lua modules | |
Data structure | |
HTML and CSS | |
Customisation and tools | |
Automated editing | |
|
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm asking for translation of w:ru:Собирательство in English.
Harvest is about agricultural harvest.
But natural resources such as (fruits, honey, mushrooms) can be picked up without agriculture (activity of humans).
I know "Recreational Shellfishing" in Washington, but I don't know more universal word in English.
In Russian it is "собирательство"/"сбор".
Other european languages may have specific words for this. D1gggg (talk) 12:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
More specifically, you've been reverted by three separate editors, yet you keep inserting the same material. Not only that, but you seem hellbent on scrubbing any links to the Chicken or the egg article. This would seem to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Please revert your recent edits to this article and discuss any changes there. There might actually be some material worth inserting, but you've deleted so much and the English you're using is so poor that it's impossible to keep just that material. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 13:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I'm asking to edit protect Chicken or the egg, we spend considerable time with @Katolophyromai: about Aristotle and Plutarch and I think in the end we both agreed about "I think that that Plutarch and Aristotle should live at Potential of thought to exist and actualization of thought"; we have many academic papers claiming Aristotle and Plutarch are about thoughts and actualization and not literally about eggs and chickens. Please save your time.))
It is clear that I'm ready spend enormous time at talk pages, warning is widely inappropriate when user seem to avoid talk D1gggg (talk) 13:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
D1gggg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"is repeatedly violating WP:BRD by reinserting badly-formatted, unclear or UNDUE additions after reversion by multiple editors." It is just wrong: 1. I don't care about illustrations: [1] 2. it should be discussed: Talk:Chicken_or_the_egg#latest_edit_by_Agricolae 3. everyone should follow WP:BRD and not just me [2] 4. not trying to be WP:TENDENTIOUS - I can give as many time to improve Chicken or the egg as needed
Decline reason:
Yeah, no. The rampant WP:NOTTHEM aside, a quick look at the article and talk page shows you engaging in egrerious WP:IDHT. The reason nobody is interested in discussing with you anymore is because people tend to learn when somebody is going to refuse to listen - the tone of the talk page there makes it very clear you don't want discussion, you want everyone to agree to your views. I'd honestly say a 24 hour block is charitable given that, and I'd make the suggestion that when this block expires you consider avoiding Chicken or the egg in your future editing, at least for awhile. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have stated "I can give as much time to improve Chicken or the egg as needed". If so what was the urgency that required you to revert nine times since 6 November? You could have proposed these changes on Talk and waited to see if others agree. EdJohnston (talk) 05:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
I want discussion why to remove [3] [4]
I don't waste my life on Flaming (Internet) and feeding: "Not only that, but you seem hellbent" "but there is a right way and a wrong way to go about improving it. The wrong way is to keep making the same changes after objections have been raised. You have already violated WP:3RR, and could have your editing privileges suspended right now - that is how wrong the way you are going about this is, but talking about it here is a good step" "is repeatedly violating WP:BRD"
WP:5P4 and WP:BRD is a just advertisement.
WP:DROP! D1gggg (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, D1gggg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 16:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
Two research projects about Wikimedia Commons are currently ongoing, or in the process of being finished:
-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 21:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
The newsletter omitted two interwiki prefixes, breaking the links on non-meta wikis as you might see above. Here are the correct links:
My apologies, I hope you find the corrected links helpful.
- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, D1gggg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, D1gggg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
Current:
Since the last newsletter:
-- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
My apologies if this is a duplicate message for you, it is being sent to multiple lists which you may be signed up for.
Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...
Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 January or Thursday, 10 January 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:
Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.
Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sailing ship#Scope?, regarding what should be included in the article. You'll find a proposed outline, there. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
There are two separate blog entries for Structured Data on Commons posted to Wikimedia Space that are of interest:
Template:Triangular mainsail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:CSSoutline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)