Autopatrolled

User:RoboCric

• RoboCric (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I've created 110 undeleted articles so far, as you can see here. You may see some issues with a few of my older articles, but those were in my early days and it is very normal for a newbie. I can guarantee you that my recent 40-50 creations are absolutely fine, and no concerns have been raised by NPRs. I want this right to reduce the NPR backlog and to get my articles indexed quickly (as I create articles about current events). I don't think reviewers have anything to do on my articles except marking as reviewed. Thanks. Robo^Cric Let's chat 18:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done Those are nice, clean articles. Good work. The only feedback that I have for you is that given you use WP:RATER to self-assess your work, you need to be aware that this tool generally results in a class rating that is higher than what it should be. I've looked through your last 10 articles and downrated something like 8 of them. But that's not an Autopatrolled issue anyway. Schwede66 21:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

User:Joris Darlington Quarshie

• Joris Darlington Quarshie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I've familiarized myself with AWB's functionalities through the English Wikipedia documentation and am confident it can significantly enhance my contributions. AWB automates repetitive tasks like adding citations, fixing formatting, and adding categories, freeing up my time to focus on higher-quality edits that require in-depth analysis and judgment. This will allow me to make more substantial contributions to English Wikipedia in a shorter timeframe.

AWB minimizes the risk of errors introduced by manual editing during repetitive tasks. This will be particularly helpful for tasks where even minor inconsistencies can be distracting or disrupt reader flow (e.g., quotation mark styles, bullet point formatting).

By granting me the rights to AWB, I will be able to dedicate more time and energy to utilizing tasks like improving the accuracy and comprehensiveness of content, adding insightful references, and expanding on under-developed sections of articles.

Lastly, once I gain experience with AWB, I can potentially mentor other editors on using the tool responsibly. This will foster a collaborative environment and empower others to make efficient and positive contributions to English Wikipedia. JDQ Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 19:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

This text appears to have been written by a large language model. Could you please explain in your own words why you want AWB access and what you plan to do with it? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done No response. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

User:MrBauer24

• MrBauer24 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have been helping out on Wikipedia for some time now, and I have become an active and trusted editor. I love helping out with "Wikignome" activities and have seen the features that AWB provides. After reading through the user manual, I feel that I could use it very effectively in order to do things such as fix common spelling mistakes and fix checkwiki errors.

I would love to be able to use this to help to make the editing process more efficient. Thank you so much. MrBauer24 (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

User:SamuelRiv

• SamuelRiv (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I used AWB a little bit several years ago before permissions were required. I will be using it again to do some quick maintenance on some templates I maintain or am working on, most immediately to update ((cite act)) and to restart work on related template projects discussed at WikiProject Law. I also have a request in at Commons, where I also do template maintenance. In addition, I do an awful lot of citation cleanup on articles, and while I apparently found AWB wasn't too helpful a tool years ago, it seems better now. SamuelRiv (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Tonymetz

• Tonymetz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Automated copy-editing like cleaning up typos, broken wikitext like --> , improving articles to abide by WP:MOS for e.g. Chemistry formulas, updating dates to use 9 April 2024 template, replacing clumsy text with proper glyphs e.g. replacing --> → → Tonymetz 💬 22:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Users are rarely approved unless they have either 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits -> you currently have 156 total mainspace edits and have given no reason why you should be approved early. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

User:IgnatiusofLondon

• IgnatiusofLondon (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

After I write or expand an article (see my userpage for lists of such articles), another editor routinely comes along to clean up my typos and minor messes for me. I'd like to trial using AWB to see if it can help me avoid making typos and other small mistakes in the first place. Thanks! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 01:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done Not sure this will actually work, but you seem to be experienced enough to qualify for this so I see no harm in letting you try. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed

User:Starixxgamerrix

• Starixxgamerrix (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Reason for confirmation, So I can use Vandalism warnings and reverts as Twinkle or RedWarn. My account is more that 4 days old and I have made more than 10 edits. Starixxgamerrix (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot ^talk 02:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Johnathen2004

• Johnathen2004 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights, I've tried to recover my old account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Johnathen04, because I accidentally clicked log out button and since then, I cannot no longer access it, even when I requested a new password. I've made 38 edits and It's more than 10 days old So then I created new account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Johnathen2004. Could you someone please accept my reason to get permission to get Confirmed? Johnathen2004 (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Unless you can login from Johnathen04 and confirm with an edit (using that account) that this request is indeed legitimate, then no we cannot do that. Fortunately for you (which you've also alluded to above), the threshold for obtaining the autoconfirmed right is very low. Closing as  Not done -Fastily 09:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed

Event coordinator

New page reviewer

User:Shashwat986

• Shashwat986 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have been tagging and flagging new pages for a long time, but with a lot of infrequency. However, since I'm unable to mark a page as patrolled, I'm not able to help reduce the workload on the rest of the editors here. With this permission, whenever I'm looking into new pages, I'll be able to make more of a difference. Shashwat986 → talk 07:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 372 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 07:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

My edits are lower than the threshold of 500, but that is due to my work on New Pages. As a result of my work, I have over 1200 edits in User_talk pages (implying around 800 pages successfully deleted). If the 500 is still a hard-cutoff, I withdraw my request. Shashwat986 → talk 09:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

@Shashwat986: It's flexiblish, but explicitly doesn't include deleted edits – we're looking for people with experience improving articles as well as deleting them. I can see that you were quite active in new page and CSD patrolling in 2010–13, but since then you've been almost completely inactive. Welcome back! The CSD are basically the same as they were then, but the kind of new pages we see has changed quite a lot, as have community expectations on sourcing, notability, etc.

Based on your prior experience, I'd be willing to grant you the right despite not meeting the formal criteria (with the usual one-month trial period), but could you please first confirm that you've familiarised yourself with the current guidelines at WP:NPP? – Joe (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, though I have to say Moneyview gives me pause. Could you explain what prompted you to write that article and where you found the sources? – Joe (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm working in the financial technology sector in India, and I've done a lot of research in the field. I was planning to start with Moneyview, since I've used the app a lot more, and there was a draft page to jump-off of. The plan was to write articles on many more companies in this space, since it seems underrepresented on Wikipedia. I'm realising, after creating the article, that it's coming off a lot as WP:PAID, which is understandable, but inaccurate. Shashwat986 → talk 04:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Pbritti

• Pbritti (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Requesting a trial period of a month or less (dealer's choice) to address the backlog. I was previously granted this permission last summer but resigned them after a request to do so stemming from my repeated draftification of articles on potentially notable subjects that were created by disruptive editors (a more detailed accounting of that can be found in the discussion that took place on my talk page). Essentially, I wouldn't do that again, instead following the current NPP best-practices of leaning on more procedural alternatives like PROD, AfD, and improvement tags. I have a good amount of experience in AfC, have participated in a decent number of AfDs, and have a strong track record with my own article creations. I can provide additional context or affirmations of understanding of the current NPP standards as requested. I would prefer a trial period of at least two week so that my use of the permission can be observed and critiqued with enough examples. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

User:14 novembre

• 14 novembre (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I meet the criteria with a very large margin, and have a significant experience in the areas requested. I had a request declined some time ago, but now I think I have done much experience and this User right could help me improve the effectiveness of my contributions. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 21:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 21:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

User:ToadetteEdit

• ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

After hearing that there will be a new backlog drive in May, I would like to reduce the very high backlog drive. Although I am theoretically ineligible until June (I've had a 3mo partial block), the pblock is too unrelated to content editing, deletion processes and AfC, and my behavior has changed since then. If the pblock is still a red flag, please let me know. Thanks for considering my application. Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 07:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Jtrrs0

• Jtrrs0 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Page mover

User:Gobonobo

• Gobonobo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I'm requesting page mover rights for myself. I plan on using it to address page move vandalism and for other non-controversial tasks, such as moving articles created in the wrong namespace or draftification. I'm familiar with the policies/guidelines around naming/moving and have some experience at WP:RM. gobonobo ^{+ c} 07:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

User:GSS

• GSS (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

My page mover rights were revoked due to my inactivity, and I applied to have them reinstated in February. I was asked to wait for a few weeks by Fastily, so here I am, back after nearly two months of activity, requesting to have this user right reinstated so I can continue using the tool to move pages when necessary. Thank you, GSS ^💬 06:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 07:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer

User:WizardGamer775

• WizardGamer775 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi, I would like to request the Pending Changes Reviewer permission as I would like to help out with reviewing pages on my watchlist which are on pending changes protection. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

May I ask if there is any update regarding my application? WizardGamer775 (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

@WizardGamer775 Really don't know. Other people who have come after and before me have become accepted, so I'm not sure. Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 14:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Waylon111

• Waylon111 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Here's the criteria I have for being a Pending Changes Reviewer:

1. I have a account 3 years old (although I have started picking up editing beginning November 2023)

2. I think I have a good editing history, and a good track record.

3. I understand what's vandalism and what isn't (accidentally misspelling a word during your edit is in good faith, but doing things like changing the date of a movie from 2024 to 1956 is vandalism)

4. I know the basic policies, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:!, WP:NOR, and WP:NPOV.

5. I know that you cannot violate the Copyright policy. (WP:C)

6.I understand the guidelines on reviewing.

But, you may ask, why do I want this permission? My answer is, to help people out on Wikipedia. If someone makes a edit that might not be correct, I could correct them on their edit. And I would like to use this tool to help "implode vandals", as the cool kids say. :) Waylon (he was here) (Does my editing suck? Let's talk.) (Also, not to brag, but...) 03:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Just a suggestion, but continually republishing your request will make your request go through slower, not faster. Also, if the bot is wrong, let it be wrong. TheTechie (formerly Mseingth2133444) (t/c) 16:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Sunnyboi18

• Sunnyboi18 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi, I'm requesting permissions to Review Pending Changes for a few reasons, and hope ya'll will consider me. First, I've made 600+ Edits, including many of signifigance to multiple pages on various different Social/Historical topics. Second, I've extremely rarely ever had my edits reverted and that's been due to someone feeling my citation was not the best, but I've not had any major compliants. Third, I vote in the Picture of the Year & Arbitration Committee Election, and I'm familiar with WP Guidelines and Copyright. And I just enjoy getting to help have accurate and up to date information on Wikipedia, considering how many folks use this for information. And I'd be more than willing to take on the responsiblity of helping to ensure that continues and is done well. And I'd just like to thank whoever is taking the time to read this and hope to hear back soon, and thank you work that you do, you're the reason Wikipedia is sucessful :). Sunnyboi18 (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

User:FortunateSons

• FortunateSons (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I care about our encyclopaedic purpose, and allowing newer users to contribute is important to ensure the longevity of the project and a productive participation by new editors.

Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I regularly and actively used talk pages as well as projects and the RS noticeboard, and have shown an ability to understand and apply policy.

I have actively edited in the past and intend to do so in the future.

Receiving this right would allow me to assist in improving the project.

Thank you in advance for taking the time! FortunateSons (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Bigar

• Bigar (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights

I have been an active user for 17 years and have Rollback rights. I am mainly involved in the Songs project and often need to patrol a page where unsourced and incorrect information is often re-added. Having the ability to use Pending Changes would simplify this matter. Bigar (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

User:GodeNehler

• GodeNehler (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I working since more than ten years for wikipedia. So I like to extend my activity and therefore I request the permission to work as reviewer at the english Wikipedia. I have read the rules for the review process and think I can apply the rule adequately. As reference: I have such permission in the german Wikipedia since long time and try to use it wisely. GodeNehler (talk) 14:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

User:JackkBrown

• JackkBrown (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I would like to obtain this role in order to be able to control ongoing changes, I could be very useful to the encyclopaedia for this as well. JacktheBrown (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done DanCherek (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Rollback

User:TheGreatestLuvofAll

• TheGreatestLuvofAll (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have reverted vandalism from IPs and users who made tests, added unsourced content, and making purely disruptive edits to articles here. I have been doing this for about a month now. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

I see that you not consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 04:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

I don’t want it anymore. Please remove this request TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 17:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Request withdrawn. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

User:14 novembre

• 14 novembre (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I meet the requirements, and I think that rollback rights could help me work more effectively on contrasting vandalism. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 15:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are not consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 04:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily Yes, I try to do it as much as possible and I think rollback rights could improve my contributions. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 08:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sure it will, however rollback isn't going to help you leave notifications to editors when you revert their edits. Can you please comment on why you haven't been consistently warning editors and how you'll be improving on this? -Fastily 09:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

@Fastily I sometimes thought mistakenly that notifying users was not that important. However, I have understood it is and I will be more careful in notifying users. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 13:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for confirming. Admins use warnings for additional context and/or to track disruptive individuals, so it's very important to leave them for every revert you make.  Done -Fastily 20:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Sink Cat

• Sink Cat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I believe that I can more easily combat vandalism as I already have been doing (see Contribs) by having the access to this permission. Sink Cat (talk) 20:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are not consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi there,

The first example you wasn't a case of vandalism, but a decision based on grammatical wording. If that too requires a talkpage notice, then I'd be happy to do so going forward :)

The other two examples you give though are correct. Prior to March 26, I was spotty with my warning of users for their vandalism, or my notification of other matters. There's no excuse for skipping such actions, and will be more diligent going forward. If it would be better, should I make another request near the end of April when I have demonstrated a more consistent track record?

Sincerely,

Sink Cat (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Begocc

• Begocc (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hi, i've been patrolling vandalism for some time, on recent changes and filter log, and wanted to request rollback to use other tools like huggle or antivandal, as well as using my current tools better. Thanks! begocc ^questions? 10:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are not consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I think that might be due to me accidentally going back to the previous page (recent changes) before the message saves from the UV menu. My mistake. begocc ^questions? 12:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks for confirming. Please ensure that you are consistently leaving warnings and/or notifications to editors when reverting.  Done -Fastily 20:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

User:The Master of Hedgehogs

• The Master of Hedgehogs (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Hello! I am the Master of Hedgehogs, and I am requesting Rollback permissions on the English Wikipedia, because it will help with fighting vandals. I have made more than 200 mainspace edits, and I use Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool, Real-Time Recent Changes, and normal recent changes patrol to look for vandalism edits and revert them using tools like Twinkle and RedWarn. After reverting, I make sure to warn the user properly. - Master of Hedgehogs ^{(converse) (hate that hedgehog!)} 12:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I'm concerned by these two complaints (1, 2) on your talk page with regards to these two reverts (1, 2) respectively. RC patrol isn't a race. Please slow down, be more careful, and *actually* ensure that what you're reverting is indeed vandalism. -Fastily 03:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

User:Neuropol

• Neuropol (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

Improving the effectiveness of my counter-vandalism activities; opening of new tools. Link to CVUA trainer go-ahead for request. Thanks,Neuropol^Talk 14:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 19:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Template editor

User:Numberguy6

• Numberguy6 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

See User talk:Numberguy6#Expand language. Numberguy6 (talk) 22:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~7.5)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~41k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1300)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1 (+1 pending))

Primefac (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I am disinclined to grant this; it was suggested to you that you should have this permission but I don't really see any evidence of you needing it. While you have made more than the indicated two TPERs (I count 5-6), they are simple/trivial updates and thus I have not added them into the guideline count. In other words: are you simply making this request because someone said you should, or do you think you actually need this permission? Primefac (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

On the other hand the fact that the request at Template talk:Expand French has languished for weeks suggests the edit request process is not working for those two requests and thus there is a need. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)