I can appreciate you trying to help but you need to read WP:OLYMOSNAT because the changes you're making are wrong. I used to think using the wheat color to indicate rounds that didn't happen was right too but then I actually read the manual of style. I don't want to get in an edit war with you over this but if you persist I will report you. You seem to know how to run wiki tables so let's not try to overwrite each other because we'll have enough idiots to deal with as the Games get closer. Torlek (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello I am too fan of olympics, but I see that for about days you update hardly pages has my big regret can you move forward faster thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminfandesjo (talk • contribs) 15:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
I have to say I don't take too kindly to you undoing my removal of the forced column widths on these articles ([1], [2]) without any explaination in the edit summary. If you think there is a good reason for having them then by all means lets discuss it but the standard format for this type of article is not to do so as the results tables are already very wide in many cases without the addition of unnecessary blank space - Basement12 (T.C) 11:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Serbia at the 2012 Summer Olympics does not have an edit summary. For a third time I ask you to please not readd the forced widths without discussion first, and certainy not to do it without the use of an edit summary - Basement12 (T.C) 16:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you apply them in all of the nations if you think that some rows have unnecessary spaces? I am already tired with editing and revising them. I spent weeks and days to do them. (T.C) 16:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)))
Why can't we use the width of 150 for the athletes? They look similar to those from the 2008 Summer Olympics. I wanted to do something different for this year's Olympics by adapting a table format for the results. (T.C) 17:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)))
I see you added the relay team members to the United States at the 2012 Summer Olympics. What is your source for that? I get all of the USATF press releases (actually I seem to keep proofreading them and sending them back for correction). I also checked the USATF site. There has been no announcement I can find of the relay team members. Yes, you and I can conjecture, but that's not what we should be definitively reporting on Wikipedia. We even have additional issue because the men's and women's teams select using different methods. And what about Allyson Felix? She didn't run the 400 but with a PR about a second faster than those other girls is certainly likely to be considered for a spot. I'm waiting for decisions in writing. Trackinfo (talk) 06:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to leave you note and ask if you have a source that states there will only be four independent Olympians at the forthcoming London Olympics, as you stated with this edit. The thing is, the sources now cited in the article give a total of seven. I desperately want the numbers in the article to be correct, but they also need to be properly sourced. I'm not challenging the accuracy of the edits you made, but I think it would help us all if you pointed us toward wherever it was you heard that there were going to be four, and not seven as the London 2012 site and olympic.org states. Thanks! Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 04:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Since you were helpful with the above inquiry, I wonder if you might be able to point me toward a source that says there will be four Independent Olympic Athletes at the Games, rather than seven, which is what the London 2012 site and Olympic.org have led me to believe. A few users have changed it from seven to four several times without ever citing sources. Thanks! Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 00:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Basement12 (T.C) 14:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Olympics Barnstar | |
A token of my appreciation for the hundreds, if not thousands of updates you've been making to the 2012 Olympic nation articles. Keep up the good work! - Basement12 (T.C) 17:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, just wondering what your thoughts are on the boxes containing "Did not advance". Earlier, you changed one of them to have the n/a style grey background, so I consequently changed the others to be the same. Now you have changed it back to having a plain background. Why is this? Should they all have blank backgrounds? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airelivre (talk • contribs) 18:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry if I reverted some of your changes, did not realise that. I came across the use of that "n/a|Did not advance" template a few days ago, and thought it was much better than a simple "colspan+Did not advance". God knows there was zero consensus four years ago, we had red backgrounds, green backgrounds, some beige backgrounds, sometimes italics, sometimes not. I still feel using the grey background and n/a template would be a general improvement this year, both information-wise and design-wise, but I'll follow consensus if it is against it. --JMDP (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Regarding this edit: ranks for athletics should be given within heats not overall (this is different to what we do for swimming) as qualifiers for latter rounds are decided by the fastest 'X' finishers in each heat. Thanks - Basement12 (T.C) 10:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Field events appear to use the overall rank, as you will see in the field event that they aren't split into heats and that "the top 12 athletes qualify" or something similar. That's different to some of the shorter track events where the first 3 or 5 of each heat qualify. Rudolph89talk 00:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The official results have a column for overall rank and place in heat. Since there is only one column "rank" that is used in the Wikipedia table, the value to use should be the place in heat as that directly relates to whether they qualify or not - that is the critical value. The same situation happens in the Rowing table, where the place in heat is used in the rank column, rather than overall rank.Rudolph89talk 21:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello Raymarcbadz.
Thanks for your hard work on articles relating to the recent Summer Olympics. I have many of the pages on my watchlist, and it seems you are contributing in every single one of them.
One thing though; in your recent edit of the article covering Austria, you removed a comma in the lede. Actually, that comma should be there, according to WP:Basic copyediting, section Common edits, bullet point 9.
Thanks for your understanding.
HandsomeFella (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello Raymarcbadz.
I can see on my watchlist that you are doing an absolutely fabulous job on wikipedia. You're carrying out a herculean task. Don't forget to take a break every now and then though. There is a life outside wikipedia, believe it or not. ;-)
Regards
HandsomeFella (talk) 08:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Probably is time for you to improve your editing. Would you like to write a Good article? Then you have to get familiar with all this:
Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Mostly with the Manual of Style and also take a look to this essay: Wikipedia:Writing better articles. Thanks for being here, but remember spending time in real life with real people. Osplace 19:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 26 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michelle Engelsman, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after her retirement in 2008, Australian swimmer Michelle Engelsman was honoured for her "Speedo Services to the Australian Swimming Team"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Engelsman. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind if I nominated Angelo Ciccone for DYK? Thanks, Matty.007 16:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Angelo Ciccone, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Angelo Ciccone lapped the entire field, but didn't win a point in the Men's Madison at the 2008 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Angelo Ciccone. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
hello, could you update the qualified athletes in each country these 2014 Olympic Games if you like it! thank you very much .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminolympique (talk • contribs) 10:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
"Not necessarily, we put both men and women together on one table if the luge group consists of a maximum of 6 athletes; " what if the athlete is competing in more then one event? Do we split if the events are over 6 per gender? (For ex. Bulgaria has 2 male athletes and 9 events in between them + a women with 3 events, do we separate or keep together?) Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
hello, I wanted to say that I admire all that you do for these games sochi, I too am a fan of jo, I note all skilled in paintings, you help me a lot, how y'auras t 'he qualified nations? what are the flagship? THANKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminolympique (talk • contribs) 14:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | On 25 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juana Wangsa Putri, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 2002, Indonesian taekwondo practitioner Juana Wangsa Putri won a silver medal at the Asian Championships and a bronze at the Asian Games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juana Wangsa Putri. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Ray Marc. You have been a prolific contributor of new articles about Olympic athletes, including a couple hundred about Olympic swimmers: [7]. Since the last Olympics, Template:Infobox swimmer and its associated formatting have been revised and updated to address a number of concerns and to ensure a more uniform appearance for all Olympic swimmer articles. (See the template instructions and examples of uniform formatting @ Template:Infobox swimmer.) Many of your Olympic swimmer articles were created before these infobox and related formatting changes were implemented. At present, about half of the 4400 articles that use Infobox swimmer have been fully converted to current standardized version of the infobox template and its uniform formatting, leaving over 2000 articles still to convert. To date all of the American, Australian, and Canadian Olympic swimmers (and most of the Brits) have been fully converted to the new standard, but it is fairly time-consuming work requiring 5 to 10 minutes per article. Three or four editors have been consistently working on this project for the past four months, and we seem to be on track to complete the process some time in the first half of 2016. It would, of course, be helpful if we had all of the existing Olympic swimmer articles fully converted before people start creating new swimming articles in advance of the 2016 Olympics.
All of that said, I'm here to ask for your help. Would you be willing to take responsibility for converting the swimmer articles you created to the current standardized infobox and related uniform formatting? If so, that would be a big help to WikiProject Swimming as we work our way through this. Please let me know. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 10:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, just interested to know what your goal was when modifying a lot of Olympic templates such as ((2016 Summer Olympics men's football group A standings)) that was following most recent consensus and module standard for Module:Sports table. Qed237 (talk) 13:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The discussions we had when creating this module (to find consistency over all sports and to avoid use of multiple templates to create a table) has led to the fact that most information should be shown and not hidden per wikipedia guidelines. As an example the extra column for qualification has been added (it previously existed on football/soccer league tables) because we should not only use colors because some readers are colorblind. To write it out works better for all readers independent on what plattform they use to read the content, and to have the full information does not hurt. However, I have shortened it as we dont need "advanced to" as that is fairly obvious. Qed237 (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I have been looking some more and it seems like a new submodule is required for the volleyball case with both sets and points. Currently we can handle one case but not the other. I am working on it, and looking for other similar tables. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
You are treading a very fine line with all these reverts. Adding men's and women's to the event column works fine to distinguish them. Please cease being so disruptive and only make these changes if/when there is consensus to do so - Basement12 (T.C) 15:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
I am aware of all these conditions and do not update unless the NOC has already confirmed these athletes. Also I only update Japan and South Korea judokas. I would appreciate being asked before having the updates reverted.
The All-Japan Judo Federation has already held a press conference announcing the judokas for the Olympics, and will send out a judoka for each weight division with the exception of the heavyweights.
References:
http://www.100judo.com/post/japan-announces-team-for-rio-ono-is-in
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/sports/2016/05/02/more-sports/judo/inoue-determined-help-japan-keep-pace-judo/#.V0xXtiN9568
The Korea Judo Association bases Olympic qualification on the national tournament, not only rankings. I saw that someone wrote Wang Ki-chun as being the Korea representative on the qualifications list just because he was ranked the highest, but actually Lee Seung-soo was chosen because he won the national title.
References:
http://www.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2016051610022503209
http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2016/05/11/0200000000AKR20160511142600007.HTML?06daf000
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UocH4d0usRc
Regards, Pink-seoul-judo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
When there is only one table with a handful of athletes (and only one athlete per event) we should be sorting by surname alphabetically, regardless of gender. To do anything else would suggest a somewhat sexist bias. Where we have multiple athletes per event, a good example being modern pentathlon events, it makes sense to do men's first then women (i.e. alphabetically by event) so that the event name cells can be merged - Basement12 (T.C) 10:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Any suggestions if we need to revitalize or revise the structure of tables on athletes across all sports (except team-based of course)? Raymarcbadz (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
"More than a single athlete in a sport category, whether individual, pair, or team, athletes must be arranged first with all men's events grouped before women's events ("Men's" is alphabetically first), then (if applicable) by increasing event distance/weight category/etc. within each gender, and finally alphabetically according to the last names of the athletes."
If the change was made then the tables at Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics would then be arranged as you were suggesting. I think any larger/more structural changes to the guidelines would be better left to a quieter period of editing. If you think that wording sounds OK I'll start a discussion at WT:OLY. - Basement12 (T.C) 12:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Hallo, I'm writting to you because I had chance to qualify at diving to the Games. I just want to know how final, and how official is those article that you edit few days ago (Diving at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification). And what is the source, how do you get those informations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDy91 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop undoing my work. By replacing editable headers with a semi-colon, you are undoing the repairs to the formatting I have spent time doing. Without being editable, you are making this page far more difficult to edit, to accurately locate where you are out of one of the more complex pages on wikipedia. By adding the requirement to sort through this complex formatting, you will prevent most users from being able to figure out where to properly make an edit. By having a header, it reduces that potential for error. Trackinfo (talk) 03:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hey, if you want i can do the German rosters for the olympic teamsports. So you don't have as much work. ;) Kante4 (talk) 07:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi Raymarcbadz,
I just wanted to say that I will take care of Sportsfan1234, I just need more free time on Wikipedia to allow it. If you want to start it, I could help you to support or write it.
By the way, 2 questions:
1- Shooting: Do you know if any shooters will be qualified from “other events” like the 2012 Olympics? Cause if you compare right now, there is not many qualifiers from other events vs 2012 Do you know when the final list by ISSF will be published?
2- Canoeing: Romania and Belarus have been suspended for doping; do you know if any of the quotas will be reallocated, cause so far Canada and New Zeland should have it. I dunno if you have news on this side. ICF said quotas would be reallocated by Monday but I don’t have any infos so far. Thanks and keep your good work (and also good attitude lol.)
Best regards,
TGG23
TheGreenGiant23 (talk) 00:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Pianoman320. Raymarcbadz, thanks for creating Golf at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's individual!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I tagged this article as needing references (it has none), otherwise it looks great. Thanks for the work!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Pianoman320 (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
There is no explanations for your edits. If you look on the talk page there is another editor that agrees with combining the original table with a table showing the number of athletes that were rejected. The issue of doping has become central to the 2016 team. The team competition results cannot be evaluated without considering the doping issue. The reader must have a way to see which team's and how many athletes were disallowed to compete. This information should be presented in a table, so it is easily accessed, just like the information regarding the competing athletes. If you delete my contribution then I ask that you please make another table showing the rejections. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! About the ranking in the seperate events of the artistic Gymnastics. The rankings in individual events are what determines qualifications in those events, so they are relevant. (Also they double as the person's placement in that event if they did not qualify further.) However, I agree that the current table isn't sufficiently explanatory.
We could change this:
Athlete | Event | Qualification | Final | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apparatus | Total | Rank | Apparatus | Total | Rank | ||||||||
V | UB | BB | F | V | UB | BB | F | ||||||
Emma Larsson | All-around | 14.066 | 12.766 65 |
14.000 27 |
13.500 42 |
54.332 | 35 | Did not advance |
Into this:
Athlete | Event | Result | Qualification | Final | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apparatus | Total | Apparatus | Total | Rank | |||||||||
V | UB | BB | F | V | UB | BB | F | ||||||
Emma Larsson | All-around | Points | 14.066 | 12.766 | 14.000 | 13.500 | 54.332 | Did not advance | |||||
Rank | — | 65 | 27 | 42 | 35 |
Do you have a better suggestion on how to incorporate rankings? Given that it's ranking, not points, that determines qualification in the events, it's very relevant to include it. -- Lejman (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Athlete | Event | Qualification | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apparatus | Total | Rank | Apparatus | Total | Rank | ||||||||||||||||||
Floor | Pommel horse | Rings | Vault | Parallel bars | Horizontal bar | ||||||||||||||||||
Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | F | PH | R | V | PB | HB | ||||||
Chris Brooks | Individual qualification |
14.533 | 1 | 12.766 | 2 | 14.566 | 3 | 14.400 | 4 | 15.300 | 5 | 14.766 | 6 | 86.331 | 19 Q | ||||||||
Jake Dalton | 15.600 | 5 Q | — | 14.900 | 6 | 15.133 | 8 | 15.166 | 9 | 14.333 | 4 | — | |||||||||||
Danell Leyva | — | 14.533 | 12 | — | — | 15.600 | 4 Q | 15.333 | 3 Q | — | |||||||||||||
Sam Mikulak | 15.800 | 2 Q | 13.100 | 10 | 14.533 | 18 | 15.100 | 7 | 15.375 | 9 | 15.133 | 4 Q | 89.041 | 7 Q | |||||||||
Alex Naddour | 14.700 | 5 | 15.366 | 3 Q | 15.000 | 9 | 15.100 | 10 | — | ||||||||||||||
Chris Brooks Jake Dalton Danell Leyva Sam Mikulak Alex Naddour |
Team | 46.100 | 1 | 42.999 | 3 | 44.466 | 2 | 45.333 | 2 | 46.275 | 1 | 45.232 | 1 | 270.405 | 2 Q |
Athlete | Apparatus | Total | Rank | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | PH | R | V | PB | HB | |||
Chris Brooks | ||||||||
Sam Mikulak |
Athlete | Event | Points | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
Jake Dalton | Floor | ||
Danell Leyva | Parallel bars | ||
Horizontal bar | |||
Sam Mikulak | Floor | ||
Horizontal bar | |||
Alex Naddour | Pommel horse |
Athlete | Event | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apparatus | Total | Rank | |||||||||||||
Floor | Pommel horse | Rings | Vault | Parallel bars | Horizontal bar | ||||||||||
Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | Points | Rank | ||
Chris Brooks | Individual | 14.533 | 1 | 12.766 | 2 | 14.566 | 3 | 14.400 | 4 | 15.300 | 5 | 14.766 | 6 | 86.331 | 19 Q |
Jake Dalton | 15.600 | 5 Q | — | 14.900 | 6 | 15.133 | 8 | 15.166 | 9 | 14.333 | 4 | — | |||
Danell Leyva | — | 14.533 | 12 | — | — | 15.600 | 4 Q | 15.333 | 3 Q | — | |||||
Sam Mikulak | 15.800 | 2 Q | 13.100 | 10 | 14.533 | 18 | 15.100 | 7 | 15.375 | 9 | 15.133 | 4 Q | 89.041 | 7 Q | |
Alex Naddour | 14.700 | 5 | 15.366 | 3 Q | 15.000 | 9 | 15.100 | 10 | — | ||||||
Chris Brooks Jake Dalton Danell Leyva Sam Mikulak Alex Naddour |
Team | 46.100 | 1 | 42.999 | 3 | 44.466 | 2 | 45.333 | 2 | 46.275 | 1 | 45.232 | 1 | 270.405 | 2 Q |
Athlete | Event | Apparatus | Total | Rank | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | PH | R | V | PB | HB | ||||
Chris Brooks | Individual | ||||||||
Sam Mikulak | |||||||||
Chris Brooks Jake Dalton Danell Leyva Sam Mikulak Alex Naddour |
Team | 12.000 N/A 12.300 15.100 14.500 |
274.133 | ![]() | |||||
Team total | 46.900 | 47.333 | 45.600 | 46.333 | 48.000 | 42.900 |
Athlete | Event | Points | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
Jake Dalton | Floor | ||
Danell Leyva | Parallel bars | ||
Horizontal bar | |||
Sam Mikulak | |||
Floor | |||
Horizontal bar | |||
Alex Naddour | Pommel horse |
208.58.64.104 (talk) 07:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I see you reverted my corrections to the athletics table at Australia at the 2016 Summer Olympics. As per the official results, there are no quarterfinals at this Olympics. see 400m or 100m. The list of stages clearly says Preliminary Round (for 100m only), Round 1, Semifinals and Final. Given that no Australian competed in the preliminary round, it doesn't add any value to have an entire column of N/A and Bye, nor to mislabel the Round 1 as a Quarterfinal for the Women's 100m. The-Pope (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to know why you removed the references I added to the article Latvia at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 17:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed you and Hautala had opinions on wether to list Judo rankings or not at Finland's 2016 Summer Olympics page. Given this, I would be interested in your input on this proposal on the topic. Thanks in advance! -- Lejman (talk) 03:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey, In Wrestling technical points are the score, not classification points. Classification points are not the score, they are given after the match to determinate how equal/unequal the match was and to rank the wrestlers who lost in the same round.
Classification points Classification points are credited at the end of each match in the tournament and serve as the primary tool for ranking wrestlers at the end of the tournament. Classification points are different than technical points, which are the actual points that wrestlers score during the matches themselves.
--Klõps (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Technical points, which are the actual points that wrestlers score during the matches themselves. can it be be said more clearly? --Klõps (talk) 15:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hey Rey, Your doing great with these Olympic articles. Just wanted to let You know why it took so long yesterday for me to understand Your point. Actually question is about relevance. Tech points are the score that decide the match result. Class points are decided by the referees after the match and their only purpose is to rank the wrestlers who didn't reach the medal matches. Referees just tick the right box.
In case of the medal matches class points are totally irrelevant. Class points are secondary ranking system. Btw it is the same if we would rank football results so that all the wins would be 3–0 and draws 1–1 what ever the real score were.
The legend is redundant anyway, as the class points determine themselves if loser had technical points or not, so marking the PP, PO, ST actually is doubling the info.
Classification points system:
5–0 Victory by fall.
5–0 Winning by injury, withdrawal, default or disqualification.
4–0 Victory by technical superiority, the Loser without technical points.
4–1 Victory by technical superiority, the Loser with technical points.
3–0 Victory by points, the Loser without technical points.
3–1 Victory by points, the Loser with technical points.
0–0 Disqualifications to both wrestlers
So class points score 5–0VT written by words is – Victory by fallVictory by fall Do you still think that class points are more relevant than tech points? --Klõps (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
What if someone loses or wins by fall?
Event pages mark them with superscript F Shariati 2F–0 Popp. From here: Men's Greco-Roman 130 kg
or if both opponents earned a draw?
The rules try to exclude chance for draw, but if they do happen winner is decided by highest technical points awarded, cautions or by last tech point awarded. Wrestling rules by United World Wrestling page 23
In case of tie by points, the winner will be declared by successively considering:
- the highest value of holds
- the least amount of cautions
- the last technical point(s) scored
It looks like event pages only use bolding the winners score. Even the official pdf reports leave it for the reader to know the rules which wrestler won. Superscript W might be used 2W–2
Classification points page 15 The loser is eliminated and ranked according to the classification points marked, except wrestlers who lost against one of the finalists as they take part in the repechage for the 3rd or 5th places.
Classification criteria From the 7th place, wrestlers of each category will be ranked depending on their ranking points, retirement or forfeit, injury or disqualification.
So for all the medal winners and finalists these classification points do not mean anything – totally irrelevant secondary rating system. --Klõps (talk) 20:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for adding race descriptions in event articles about Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics, but I noticed the language is far from neutral in many cases. For example, [10] has phrases such as Kyle Chalmers stunned the vastly experienced field of sprinting superstars
, Pieter Timmers rocked an astonishing 47.80
, and Duncan Scott finished a fantastic fifth
. And I found similar subjective phrases in several other articles from Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics. In an encyclopedia it's better to let the facts speak for themselves, and let the reader decide whether an achievement is fantastic or not, for example by referring to their (lack of) previous achievements. Gap9551 (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
the fast-charging Suneven though Sun outsplitted Horton by only 0.01 on the final lap. You reinstated other point-of-view edits I removed such as
incredible turn[11],
relentless attack[12], and
loaded field[13] (it is better to simply describe the achievements of those in the field). Those terms are not suited for an encyclopedia.
sprint dorsalwithout discussion despite me arguing in my edit summary that
"sprint" is debatable for a 52 second race, and also "dorsal" is not used as synonym of backstroke swimming. Also [14]
Hosszú immediately passed the American at the final 25-metre stretchdoesn't make sense as you just mentioned the turn in the previous sentence, and those locations are separated by 25 meter, i.e., not "immediate". Finally you reverted me adding a last name to your own version for no clear reason.
I think we misunderstood each other here and in your following edit. With reaction times I meant the take-over time (the few tenths of a second between when one relay swimmer touches the wall and the next leaves the block), because I thought you were referring to that with brilliant exchanges
. Now I understand that by exchanges you probably meant the split time of the whole leg. Gap9551 (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a semantics issue. I understand what you mean by their Olympic title defense in this event for the fourth straight time
but technically they only defended it 3 times. Australia won in 2000, then the US in 2004-2016, for 4 titles in a row. So in 2004 the US did not defend their title, as they won it for the first time (not counting pre-2000). Gap9551 (talk) 18:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Alright. Thank you for notifying me about the corrections. If you're going to check the descriptions that I made in swimming from the previous Games (2000 to 2012), please do so. I'm tired of proofreading and I need enough time to fill out the descriptions for the remaining events. It's indeed a waste of effort for me. Raymarcbadz (talk) 03:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
It's indeed a collaborative effort. Sportsfan 1234, how come I do not assume good faith? I have sources for citation and I've put race reports with sufficient details, in each event. What is wrong with my descriptions? I don't understand why do you keep on reverting again and again? It's so annoying. Gap9551 just made corrections in the race reports, and I appreciate them without any further reason. Sometimes, he just explained several key points to me clearly, concisely, and coherently. How about you? Do you have an acquired knowledge to the sport? One more thing. If you don't want to appear the word "Olympic" and weasel words in every description, please discuss on WT:OLY or set up an article that constitutes the rules on grammar and composition related to Olympics. (just a suggestion) You're trying to lose the importance of the word "Olympic", and make the descriptions more senseless and incoherent. Raymarcbadz (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Fiji at the 2016 Summer Olympics without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why are you removing perfectly valid prose in an article?? Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Raymarcbadz. I couldn't help but notice that you are reverting almost all my editions on the XXX at the 2016 Summer Olympics articles. In all of those editions I used the Edit summary to give a brief explanation of my actions. Now, I've been noticing that you are, pretty much, reverting what I've done without giving any reasoning behind your actions neither in the summary nor in the talk page. If you want to give me the reasons behind your actions, I'll be more than glad to hear and discuss them, until then, I'll be reverting your editions to the aforementioned articles. Felviper (talk) 16:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Paraguay competed at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 5 to 21 August 2016. This was the nation's twelfth appearance at the Summer Olympics, with the exception of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow, because of its partial support to the United States-led boycott.
Paraguay competed at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 5 to 21 August 2016. Since the nation's official debut in 1968, Paraguayan athletes had appeared in every edition of the Summer Olympic Games, but did not attend the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow because of the nation's partial support for the US-led boycott.
Chad competed at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 5 to 21 August 2016. This was the nation's twelfth appearance at the Summer Olympics. Chad did not attend the 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal, and the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow because of its support of the African and the United States-led boycotts.
Thank you for your explanation, Felviper. How about this one?
Philippines competed at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 5 to 21 August 2016. Since the nation's official debut in 1924, Filipino athletes had appeared in every edition of the Summer Olympic Games, but did not attend the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow because of the nation's partial support for the US-led boycott.
or
The United States, represented by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC), competed at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, from August 5 to 21, 2016. U.S. athletes have appeared in every Summer Olympics edition of the modern era, with the exception of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow, which they boycotted.
I just got these information from the aforementioned articles and applied them to several articles of the XXX at the 2016 Summer Olympics, and then you said that all three examples are incorrect, because either the information was misleading, or the sentences should only be allowed in the XXX at the Olympics. How about the countries that have attended in every edition of the Summer Olympic Games, except for one occasion, like the United States. The sentence for the Philippines was correct, while Paraguay and Bermuda didn't. I already put the nation's official debut in XXX. What else should I add or modify other than "This was the xxth appearance at the Summer Olympics", especially for those who have many absences in the past? Unless you want to leave them with only one sentence in general, or add a background section for a brief information about the nation (see this example). Some of them managed to expand their descriptions with the possibility of being nominated for "good article" category. Thanks! Raymarcbadz (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC))
Why? Its the same with most of the GA xyz at the 2016 Summer Olympics. Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
The IOC refers to CIV as Côte d'Ivoire [15] and TLS as Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (shortened too Timor-Leste) [16]. So please do not change the above module to your preference without a proper discussion/consensus please. Thanks. Primefac What are your thoughts on this? Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#SvG cleanup going wrong where some of your recent article moves have been questioned by User:Fram. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
thanks for moving some. given the eye of sauron about,
you might want to try checking each reference and using the find button - keep up the good work. Beatley (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi again, I just realized there's an inconsistency between Template:Olympic swimming record codes and Template:Swimming record codes. Just recently, I resolved with another IP and the World Championships articles should use "ER", as it's the code used by FINA and listed by Omega Timing. Should there be a consistency here? Any reason other than sounding like "emergency room" that we deviate from a standard?
I've also posted to the other IP about this, and either its edits on Olympics pages need to be undone, or the code on the template needs to be changed. 24.17.207.180 (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Raymarcbadz. I noticed that you created the article 2000 Summer Olympics national flag bearers, but at the time did not include any sources. I was wondering what source(s) you used to create the article; in particular, I was looking for a source for Willy Kalombo Mwenze being the COD flagbearer, as I could not confirm this from any other sources. Thanks. Canadian Paul 14:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Is it possible to recover the Winifer Fernández article? That one was very well sourced do not know what happened there, I could not verify myself most of them. Yes, thanks to all the editors that went involved in this massive and necessary clean up, but there must be some of them needing to be recovered. Thanks for answering, --Osplace 18:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Primefac Another article that would probably make the cut was Yoraxi Meleán, can you please check? --Osplace 19:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
I've left some notes on my edits on a couple of talk pages. My main reason for changing is that the construct of "the third time done by a female in the nation's Summer Olympic history." reads really awkwardly to a native English speaker. If you want to keep that construction, maybe consider changing it to "the third time this was done by a woman in the nation's Summer Olympic history." It reads slightly better, IMO. Red Fiona (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello... you apparently removed some of the athletes I listed as being partially recognized as Swedish olympians. On the official Winter Olympic athletes page, 20 Swedish athletes are listed in cross-country skiing (see https://www.pyeongchang2018.com/en/game-time/results/OWG2018/en/general/athletes.htm ). FIS' qualification page also lists 20 quotas for Sweden in the sport (https://data.fis-ski.com/dynamic/olympic-quotas-list.html?sectorcode=cc&listid=2018 ). The Swedish olympic committee only lists 110 athletes in its olympic roster. (Source: http://sok.se/pressmeddelanden/2018-01-26-jakobsen-och-hedberg-tar-sista-os-platserna.html ).
The same was true for two alpine skiers earlier, but those have since been removed from the olympic athletes page, and the FIS quotas for Sweden in alpine skiing have been reduced too, so they're no longer an issue.
I don't think any of the cross-country athletes will participate in the games unless some of the regular athletes get sick and these get called in as reserves. That said, either we should count these athletes, list their names and include them in the roster count, or we should remove their names, and deduct them from the Swedish roster count (down to 110). That's why I've been re-adding their names; I was reverted when trying to reduce the athlete count to 110 earlier. -- Lejman (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Show me where You found this rule? If you put men and women in the same table, then arrange them alphabetically, not by gender, height, eye color etc or what ever unknown parameter. Klõps (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
If You put men and women in the same table then A is before L etc. There isn't male alphabet before female alphabet. Klõps (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Stop Edit warring. There is no reason why men should be listed before women. The discussion is still ongoing. Klõps (talk) 12:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
For nation articles, using have/had/has is grammatically correct. However, without those words, sentences make sense still and will do so after the Olympics have finished. Using have/had/has means we need to go back and remove them after the games have finished. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
I see you reverted User:Sportsfan 1234's deletion of the qualifying date for the host nation in Handball at the 2020 Summer Olympics. That user is now running wild to change that in various articles against our standard. Maybe it will be necessary to act against that user if he proceeds.--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I understand what you say and I have done my research, I ask you not to delete my editions, because there were many hours of research. By erasing that indiscriminate way, you're throwing all my work in the trash. Believe me that I am on the subject, I am part of the Mexican Olympic Committee and the National Sports Commission. Do you think it's okay if I put a note in countries where it is possible that there are changes ?, to avoid conflicts between us.
Thank you and I hope you understand that it is not good to erase my work without talking to me before and trying to reach an agreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taqueishon (talk • contribs) 22:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, i made once again my changes there. I will do them every time you do not understand it. Im serious too, Greece has NOT any more sailors or shooters on the events Greece qualified and there is not chance , 100%, my country to send other than their, everyone here knows that, we dont need any source about that. Also, Apostolos Christou has reached te OG many years before, 2012, 2016, check the history. He is not young and he didnt do the Olympic score at the European championships for God's shake. Also, the sources I added tell exactly that both swimmers joined the Greek olympic 2020 team, i will translate the titles if this is what you want but i kept the source of my code to enter it every time i see their names deleted. Im not the only one who changes everything without searching or asking the others why. Regards, Halkman8 (talk)
Why do you delete the information about the athlete and the competition that the country won her quota? (For example in this edit [[17]] and this one [[18]]) Nimrodbr (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PenthouseLive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello man, please answer me on WHY you keep EDITING my changes at the page of Greecce's participation at 2020 Olympics???? You (finally) accepted that the Greek athletes who won the participations will be the SAME who will go to Tokyo, Greece is NOT USA to have plenty of athletes. You keep EDITING the page and you put both genders at the same wiki tables. Can you please have a look at the other countries participation pages at Olympics 2016,2012 etc? Do you see for example a page having male and female sailors at the same table? Why do you have that problem? Please answer me and do not change it again and again, PLEASE. Find another page to do your own stuff if you want to keep annoying everyone. Regards, Halkman8 (talk)
You seem to have WP:OWN with nation at xxxx Olympic articles. It needs to stop right away as its disruptive. You need to discuss on talk pages and cannot blindly revert every time you disagree with something. Please comment on the talk pages. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sport climbing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's. Since you had some involvement with the Sport climbing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I will be opening a discussion section at the Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics to discuss your edits. They are not proper English, not concise and unnecessarily increase the length of the article. Please comment there. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Honestly, reverting my edits makes me feel confused and thereby frustrated. And your comments sounded unpleasant whenever you revert my edits. Please stop it. Hoping for your consideration and understanding. Thank you! Raymarcbadz (talk) 23:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Gymnastics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Sport climbing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Women's has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019 September 1#Sport climbing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
I've reverted your changes to climbers names, because the original version preserves how they are spelt in the official IFSC records and climbing media (with the exception of YiLing Song: Yiling vs YiLing appears to be 50-50).
The olympic channel source is the only one that spells the names your way.
For your convenience:
--Spacepine (talk) 03:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Raymarcbadz,
Just wanted to inquire about you deleting my edits about the Dutch men's RS:X qualification for 2020 not being decided yet due to Rijsselberghe and Badloe being tied in ranking. Not only have I provided two, as far as I can see, credible sources, one being the Dutch Olympic Committee for Sailing and one being a Dutch newspaper, but even Rijsselberghe himself confirmed this. I understand you may not be able to read Dutch, luckily this one is in English. Here's a 15 second clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgT7Z-bhHD8t=333 (timestamp 5:33 to 5:48)
--Dexcuracy (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Your insistence on removing this cited section is disruptive. You have been reverted by several editors. Take your issue to the talk page. If instead you keep insisting on deleting the content you will face a block. Your choice. I suggest that going to the talk page is the better option. Schwede66 02:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Please note I've opened up a move request at Talk:Aleksey Tokarev (sailor). Thank you. Richard3120 (talk) 23:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, feel free to put up articles on here, there's also a European one and others. You're doing decent work on sportspeople, keep it up!† Encyclopædius 07:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Afghanistan at the 1992 Summer Olympics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
g3; country did not compete in 1992
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC) >
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, saw the recent move you made to this article... You may want to run it by WP:RMC as a previous move request did not find consensus. Thanks! 162.208.168.92 (talk) 17:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
hi, I improved some tables. I saw that you changed them. I studied the methods today. There is no standard in this case. It's just a matter of taste. Not a rule. See about the filmography of the actors. Sometimes movies are written from beginning to end (year of production). Sometimes from beginning to end. The goal is to make the information concise and useful. If I could, I would have summarized all the athletes in one table. What is the use of having four separate tables for a sport other than lengthening and complicating it? Please do not change my tables. The goal is to improve. Just because something has happened in the past does not mean that it is immutable. If there is a standard style sheet, give me the link. Thankful --Sasoxia (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop including dashes in the wrestling events. These are not needed and unnecessary. Please see the explanatory guide, there is no dash included [21] Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Cycling at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Why have you rearranged the order of the boat crews? Previously they were entered in the order that the individuals were positioned in each of the boats so that it was possible to identify who the Stroke was for instance. Drams707 (talk) 11:15, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Please don't remove any of verified participants from Hungary at the 2020 Summer Olympics page. From this games, countries can enter two participants in K1, K2, C1, C2 competitions and Hungary took this opportunity. 176.63.153.240 (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
I asked you before: please, please DON'T remove any verified athletes in kayaking/canoeing from Hungary at the 2020 Summer Olympics page. What you are doing now is pure vandalism. Here is the link from the Hungarian Olympic Comimttee: http://olimpia.hu/images/Tokyo2020/dokumentumok/kajakkenusport_olimpiai_egysegek.pdf
Not to mention, your last edition for Hungarian swimmers is also completely wrong (here is a link from a Hungarian newspaper: https://telex.hu/sport/2021/06/21/hosszu-katinka-tokio-4-szam-indulas ), but I'm tired of correcting your inaccurate editions. 176.63.153.240 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. NONE of your changes in the prose of the respective sports make the article better, in fact some of the changes make it grammatically incorrect. In athletics/swimming the tables are organized by event, not athlete. For sports where they are facing a competitor, only the last name of their competitor is included in the results table to reduce clutter. As for beach volleyball, not sure why you removed the group stage and combined it into one box? Makes no sense. Please focus on other countries which have next to no updates. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Raymarcbadz (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Canada at the 2020 Summer Olympics, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 07:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Singapore at the 2020 Summer Olympics. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Singapore at the 2020 Summer Olympics. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Raymarcbadz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I need to continue editing, checking, and inspecting articles related to Olympics on Wikipedia, since I am an avid Olympic fan. Please address this unblock request immediately. Thank you!
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I also suggest when you do make your calm unblock request that you don't ask to go straight back to the area that you were being disruptive in. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 10:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
I see you rearranged list of athletes by alphabetical order. Please note that there are no rules or consensus stating that the alphabetical order is the only correct and suitable order. Please do not reorder a list if the current order is also reasonable. --阿pp (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey, in Judo there are only two scores anymore. Has been the case for three years or so. Just so you know, can be seen at the Judo articles for the Olympics or past WC's. Kante4 (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Amongst other things, don’t introduce incorrect ordering of Dutch surnames here when you clearly have no understanding of the subject matter. Thank you Poll3tj3 (talk) 13:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
To follow up on this, the following is wrong with your edits:
1. Changing correct athlete name into incorrect name in swimming.
2. Changing correct alphabetical ordering of Dutch surnames into incorrect ordering throughout.
3. Introducing inconsistencies, such as A) ordering men before women in some sports, but not in others; and B) ordering by athlete name in some sports and by event in others. There is not set way to do this, but if you do edit, make sure the result is better than it was. As it is, you have turned consistent info into inconsistent info.
4. Changing correct column headers in Cycling Track into clearly incorrect header.
5. Removing athletes' official final ranks as per olympics.com in e.g. tennis, table tennis, judo - whilst making up your own rules on which sports up to which ranks should be mentioning these.
6. Plainly reverting again all of my recent edits which addressed above items 1 through 5, and which all have their unique reasoning stated in the edit summary. This constitutes to outright vandalism and is unacceptable.
That's a lot of wrongs. Please take some time to reflect on what you are doing, maybe taking the above discussions on your user page into account as well, and refrain from starting an edit war. Thank you. Poll3tj3 (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Bro why did you remove my comment? I'm just saying that you should provide sources for this info, otherwise someone could be swizzed if they find who the REAL flagbearer is for a specific country if you put a certain athlete as "flagbearer". 60.240.12.67 (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Please, stop adding the names of the athletes in the XXX at the 2024 Summer Olympics pages, they may have validated their standards and have won a quota, but that do not mean that they will be present at the 2024 Summer Olympics because : 1) Their National Olympic Committee can decide that they do not want them at the Olympics by giving their quotas to other athletes; 2) They can be injured before the Olympics and not participate at the Olympics; 3) They can give up their quotas; 4) If lots of athletes from the same country qualify for the Olympics, the NOC can decide to choose who they want to go at Paris; 5) They are lots of reason that they can absent at Paris 2024 : it's ONE YEAR and a half !!!
Please wait for the official lists in 2024 ! Pindrice (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I do think the results wikitable is about 1 year too early. So instead of wikitables such as
Athlete | Event | Heat | Final | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time | Rank | Time | Rank | ||
Marwan El-Kamash | Men's 800 m freestyle |
I propose a table such as
Athlete | Event |
---|---|
Marwan El-Kamash | Men's 800 m freestyle |
Or a simple text without any wikitables. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Please restored again the edit to Jr Tahun as all of those swimmer qualified via 2023 AP Race London International Lama tanpa dirimu (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bahrain at the 2024 Summer Olympics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not create nation at the 2024 Summer Olympics articles without reliable sources. For this particular article, you cited an [22] article about entry standards for athletics at the 2024 Games. This reference DOES NOT mention anything to do with Bahraini athletes qualifying. I have removed the source as it has nothing to do with the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bahrain at the 2024 Summer Olympics, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bahrain at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Again, please stop adding improperly cited material. Linking a refence discussing a result, which does not touch upon Bahrain competing at the Olympics is incorrect. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ismael Alhassane, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You cannot undo a deletion discussion which resulted in redirect. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fram (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop remove that marking the second time to stage the final in india because that is true for the 71st edition of miss world was announced by president and chief executive officer of miss world, julia morley. If you continue to remove unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Miss World 2023, you may be blocked from editing. ☆ Joseatienza (talk) 00:11, 12 June 2023 (PHT) Joseatienza (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Algeria at the 2024 Summer Olympics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 19 § Algeria at the 2024 Summer Olympics until a consensus is reached. Ravenswing 23:46, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Disruptive editing, including personal attacks and WP:BATTLEGROUND, rants, some of the comments at WP:ANI about a possible topic ban are quite incredible. I for one was astounded to see you refer to other editors as "monkeys and trolls". DanCherek (talk) 18:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Raymarcbadz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I need to continue editing, checking, and inspecting articles related to Olympics on Wikipedia, since I am an avid Olympic fan. Please address this unblock request immediately. Thank you!
Decline reason:
This request does not address any of the concerns that led to your block. --Kinu t/c 18:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bans, topic or otherwise are not permanent.You will be told how to appeal and when that would be allowed if one is implemented.
(1) Will you still be listed as a participant at WT:OLY? Maybe so, maybe not; I've no idea what criteria they use or activity level they require; it is not a WikiProject in which I'm myself active. I submit that this is a petty issue that is by far the least of your worries right now.
(2) Presuming you remain indeffed and/or under a topic ban, who will edit Olympic-related articles? Someone else. Who will clean up the "messes?" Someone else. Who will update the NOC/qualification articles? Someone else. Many editors are involved in sports topics. People were editing such articles before you started on Wikipedia. People will edit such articles after you're gone. Neither yours, nor mine, nor any other editors' contributions are indispensable or irreplaceable.
(3) When will you be unblocked? You need to understand this: you were blocked because admins and community members decided, based on your many public statements and actions, that you cannot be trusted to edit as per the policies and guidelines in place, that you cannot be trusted to work collaboratively with your fellow editors, and that you are refusing to listen to the many voices attempting to get through to you. This is serious, and doubly saddening in that an editor of your longevity should have learned all of this many years ago. That you seem to comprehend so little of this makes it difficult for me to imagine how you would regain the community's trust. Whether an admin (I am not, myself, one) will unblock you down the road is one thing, but you should expect that Olympic topic ban to be in place, and that's not going away any time soon.
Anyway, that's my final attempt to get through to you; I won't be responding here. My own opinion is that quite a few editors have spent quite enough time doing that, and that's time we haven't been spending improving articles. Ravenswing 06:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Raymarcbadz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to request to have my account unblocked for many reasons but before I cite each of them, I would sincerely apologize to the editors involved for stimulating my emotional outbursts, inciting personal attacks, particularly on the public statement about "monkeys and trolls" and "Lugnuts' mess remark" in my screeds, and protesting the community's decision for a topic ban in our discussion on WP:ANI. A user of 17 years with almost 100k edits permanently, I have never deserved to get angry, shout publicly without consent, and worsen my situation with the other editors about their intent to impose a possible topic ban. As much as I try to act calmly and civilly, I know that I can be trusted to edit, to work collaboratively with my fellow editors, especially those involved in sports topics, and listen to the many voices about such criticisms related to my craft, whether article creation or article editing. I have already learned this for many years and if changes occur without engaging in disruptive editing or edit war, I would accept them. Adapting to the new policies and guidelines related to WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS, and WP:SIGCOV (this happened around two years ago) proved to be "challenging" for me because I get accustomed to the frequent article creation or editing about an Olympic athlete, an NOC article for the upcoming Olympics, or any person in general throughout the past decade. I read and understand about these policies lately but citing a source and putting significant details to the content pose an insurmountable challenge towards my end because I have no viable option but to follow them. If people agree to delete or refuse to redirect, so be it. I should stay neutral instead of ranting and engaging in a personal attack. I should have dealt with these changes and let the consensus decide without refuting any claim. I would also regret myself of my unruly actions and the inconveniences caused throughout the community especially during the WP:ANI discussion for the past three days. If you could offer me another opportunity to unblock me, I would strive to humbly acknowledge the decision made by the community about the case and if the topic ban is necessary, I would accept the fate. Thank you!
Decline reason:
Attempted block evasion at The Olympic Archives (talk · contribs). Cabayi (talk) 06:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would like to request to have my account unblocked for many reasons but before I cite each of them, I would sincerely apologize to the editors involved for stimulating my emotional outbursts, inciting personal attacks, particularly on the public statement about "monkeys and trolls" and "Lugnuts' mess remark" in my screeds, and protesting the community's decision for a topic ban in our discussion on WP:ANI. A user of 17 years with almost 100k edits permanently, I have never deserved to get angry, shout publicly without consent, and worsen my situation with the other editors about their intent to impose a possible topic ban. As much as I try to act calmly and civilly, I know that I can be trusted to edit, to work collaboratively with my fellow editors, especially those involved in sports topics, and listen to the many voices about such criticisms related to my craft, whether article creation or article editing. I have already learned this for many years and if changes occur without engaging in disruptive editing or edit war, I would accept them. Adapting to the new policies and guidelines related to WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS, and WP:SIGCOV (this happened around two years ago) proved to be "challenging" for me because I get accustomed to the frequent article creation or editing about an Olympic athlete, an NOC article for the upcoming Olympics, or any person in general throughout the past decade. I read and understand about these policies lately but citing a source and putting significant details to the content pose an insurmountable challenge towards my end because I have no viable option but to follow them. If people agree to delete or refuse to redirect, so be it. I should stay neutral instead of ranting and engaging in a personal attack. I should have dealt with these changes and let the consensus decide without refuting any claim. I would also regret myself of my unruly actions and the inconveniences caused throughout the community especially during the WP:ANI discussion for the past three days. If you could offer me another opportunity to unblock me, I would strive to humbly acknowledge the decision made by the community about the case and if the topic ban is necessary, I would accept the fate. Thank you!
Raymarcbadz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to request to have my account unblocked for many reasons but before I cite each of them, I would sincerely apologize to the editors involved for stimulating my emotional outbursts, inciting personal attacks, particularly on the public statement about "monkeys and trolls" and "Lugnuts' mess remark" in my screeds, and protesting the community's decision for a topic ban in our discussion on WP:ANI. A user of 17 years with almost 100k edits permanently, I have never deserved to get angry, shout publicly without consent, and worsen my situation with the other editors about their intent to impose a possible topic ban. As much as I try to act calmly and civilly, I know that I can be trusted to edit, to work collaboratively with my fellow editors, especially those involved in sports topics, and listen to the many voices about such criticisms related to my craft, whether article creation or article editing. I have already learned this for many years and if changes occur without engaging in disruptive editing or edit war, I would accept them. Adapting to the new policies and guidelines related to WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS, and WP:SIGCOV (this happened around two years ago) proved to be "challenging" for me because I get accustomed to the frequent article creation or editing about an Olympic athlete, an NOC article for the upcoming Olympics, or any person in general throughout the past decade. I read and understand about these policies lately but citing a source and putting significant details to the content pose an insurmountable challenge towards my end because I have no viable option but to follow them. If people agree to delete or refuse to redirect, so be it. I should stay neutral instead of ranting and engaging in a personal attack. I should have dealt with these changes and let the consensus decide without refuting any claim. I would also regret my unruly actions and the inconveniences caused throughout the community, especially during the WP:ANI discussion for the past three days. Lately, I created another account temporarily so I could get an opportunity to edit articles periodically while the indefinite blocking of my original account continues. I have discovered that the newly created account breached the rule of WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, disclosing my real identity as the original owner. I hope you understand my case. I exhausted all of my best so I could regain my trust in the community and restore my editing privileges as a way of contributing solely to the community. I promise that I will never commit such actions again. If you could offer me another opportunity to unblock me, I would strive to humbly acknowledge the decision made by the community about the case and if the topic ban is necessary, I would accept the fate. Thank you!
Decline reason:
User has said they will stop editing. PhilKnight (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lately, I created another account temporarily so I could get an opportunity to edit articles periodically while the indefinite blocking of my original account continues.Blocked means you are blocked, not just your specific account. You,Raymarcbadz, are currently not allowed to edit anywhere on the English Wikipedia. If you are topic banned, that would also mean you are not allowed to edit in those areas. Do you understand that? Are you willing to agree to a topic ban if consensus determines it's needed? I said at ANI, I'm not sure whether that would be enough and by socking you're proving it -- topic ban requires you to not edit in the area but the software doesn't block you from doing so the way a block does. If you're unblocked with a topic ban and edit in violation, we'd be right back here. That's not a productive use of anyone's time. I recommend declining as I think they're just saying what they think we want to hear, but I'm not acting on this.Star Mississippi 11:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
P.S. I have high-functional autism. Raymarcbadz (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
As far as your block goes, the prerequisites to being unblocked are that you (a) understand you broke the rules, (b) resolve not to do so again, and (c) convince an admin of your sincerity. Neither your soliloquies on this talk page, nor those on other sites -- like the thread you started on totallympics; did you really expect that no one would notice? -- are likely to help in any of this. Ravenswing 11:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Raymarcbadz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to request to have my account unblocked for many reasons but before I cite each of them, I would sincerely apologize to the editors involved for stimulating my emotional outbursts, inciting personal attacks, particularly on the public statement about "monkeys and trolls" and "Lugnuts' mess remark" in my screeds, and protesting the community's decision for a topic ban in our discussion on WP:ANI. A user of 17 years with almost 100k edits permanently, I have never deserved to get angry, shout publicly without consent, and worsen my situation with the other editors about their intent to impose a possible topic ban. As much as I try to act calmly and civilly, I know that I can be trusted to edit, to work collaboratively with my fellow editors, especially those involved in sports topics, and listen to the many voices about such criticisms related to my craft, whether article creation or article editing. I have already learned this for many years and if changes occur without engaging in disruptive editing or edit war, I would accept them. Adapting to the new policies and guidelines related to WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS, and WP:SIGCOV (this happened around two years ago) proved to be "challenging" for me because I get accustomed to the frequent article creation or editing about an Olympic athlete, an NOC article for the upcoming Olympics, or any person in general throughout the past decade. I read and understand about these policies lately but citing a source and putting significant details to the content pose an insurmountable challenge towards my end because I have no viable option but to follow them. If people agree to delete or refuse to redirect, so be it. I should stay neutral instead of ranting and engaging in a personal attack. I should have dealt with these changes and let the consensus decide without refuting any claim. I would also regret my unruly actions and the inconveniences caused throughout the community, especially during the WP:ANI discussion for the past three days. Lately, I created another account temporarily so I could get an opportunity to edit articles periodically while the indefinite blocking of my original account continues. I have discovered that the newly created account breached the rule of WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, disclosing my real identity as the original owner. I hope you understand my case. I exhausted all of my best so I could regain my trust in the community and restore my editing privileges as a way of contributing solely to the community. If you could offer me another opportunity to unblock me, I promise that I will never commit such actions again and I hereby understand the guidelines and rules imposed by the community. Thank you!
Decline reason:
Off site post acknowledged above within the last 17 hours shows continued battleground, finger pointing and failure to understand the reasons your editing is not aligned with standards, indicating this is just parroting what you believe we want to hear to be unblocked. You will need to advise what you're going to edit on if you're unblocked and topic banned from sports articles. You did not do so above. Star Mississippi 12:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesc Repiso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
* Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active sitewide block." -- Cabayi (talk) 09:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27 § Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics until a consensus is reached. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Per this AN/I thread, you have been banned from editing the English Wikipedia. (This also leads to a loss of autopatrolled status.) You have furthermore been topic-banned from articles relating to the Olympic Games, broadly construed; this will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions and will take effect in the event that your community ban is lifted. Please see WP:UNBAN regarding options for appeal. I wish you the best in any non-Wikipedia endeavors. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Raymarcbadz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 49 kg".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Raymarcbadz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Taekwondo at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's +67 kg".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Lisa Ecker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Oh sorry to clarify, I didn't mean I thought Ecker should be kept (I haven't read the sources and have zero opinion on the nom), just that I didn't think BeanieFan11 was at all involved in what I was flagging. (Sorry for repeat, testing if a clean reply vs. tool reinstates gibberish that was pointed out. Star Mississippi 16:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Ecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Guy (help! - typo?) 01:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Miss World 1984 - Thames TV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Boxing at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's lightweight has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 26 § Boxing at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's lightweight until a consensus is reached. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Raymarcbadz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tanzania at the 2024 Summer Olympics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Raymarcbadz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uganda at the 2024 Summer Olympics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Athletics at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 17 § Athletics at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres until a consensus is reached. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)