![]() |
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a new martial arts competition division made up by an organization. The only links are to the organization's web page and a youtube video. I didn't find any significant coverage of this from reliable independent sources.Mdtemp (talk)
The result was redirect to The Ultimate Fighter: Team GSP vs. Team Koscheck. J04n(talk page) 00:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to actually delete this article. I want to Redirect to The Ultimate Fighter: Team GSP vs. Team Koscheck, but the first AFD discussion was pretty heated so I thought I'd bring it here first. I don't he's notable enough to have his own article since he fails to meet WP:NMMA with only 2 top tier fights and fails to meet WP:MMANOT since none of his BJJ awards were as a black belt. He doesn't meet WP:GNG because the coverage is either routine sports reporting or summaries of TUF episodes (making the redirect even more appropriate).Mdtemp (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
BLP about a retired MMA fighter who fails to meet WP:NMMA or WP:GNG. The article's only source is a link to basic bio and fight record info.Mdtemp (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep as the nomination was withdrawn with no opposing comments. TerriersFan (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked for sources, but can't find any. There seems to be nothing to say about this institution other than what's on its own website. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to List of Once Upon a Time characters, I have deleted the copyvio content. James086Talk 09:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not independently notable: does not pass our guidelines in terms of coverage and importance. Drmies (talk) 23:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And the state of the Emma Swan page on the wikia dated February 2nd (the same date) is as follows: http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/Emma_Swan?oldid=155889
Open both in separate windows, and tell me you don't see they are nearly identical word for word. I can assure you that the Once Upon a Time Wikia does not and never copies history summaries from anywhere else, and all the summaries written for recaps, individual character pages and pages detailing items or locations were all written by a handful of users who help contribute to adding information to the website. I am very upset to learn the creation of these pages on Wikipedia is as a result of Sonofaphrodite copying whole pages from the Wikia, and taking all the credit for himself in the process of pasting everything in, and unassumingly, several users editing the page after him have no idea they are editing plagiarized content that he did not write. If he did help write *some* of the summaries on the Once Upon a Time Wikia, it is still wrong to copy and paste everything on the Wikia's individual page itself onto here because he obviously did not write the whole page on the Wikia, which is a group writing and editing effort on the Wikia itself. Applegirlz (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A typical, and typically inflated, list of characters with extensive if not exhaustive descriptions and summaries "sourced" to Wikipedia articles on the episodes. While WP:NLIST does not give much in the way of guidance, it seems clear to me that the individual entries in the list aren't notable (which WP:LISTPEOPLE does require), that there is an enormous amount of OR and trivia in here, that the fact that some of the characters have articles (Emma Swan etc.), those articles themselves don't pass muster and should be deleted as well. Whatever can be said reliably and encyclopedia can fit in the main article. Drmies (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Content management system of dubious notability. One of the developers of the system has protested to me and since that developer claims the system has 124,000 registered members and it is six years since this was rejected by the previous AfD, I am prepared to give it another discussion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. As DGG notes, a well-written discussion of Israel and legitimacy may conceivably be notable, but this is not that. No argument was put forth that this list of views is itself notable. edit: In case I wasn't clear the first time, an article on some topic like this may be worthy, but sufficient consensus says that this article is problematic. Shii (tock) 06:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I am going to undelete the article, change the title, and rewrite it from scratch to show what the good article conceived of in the "keep" votes in this discussion ought to look like. Too much time was spent in this discussion talking about imaginary good articles, and not enough writing such an article. Shii (tock) 06:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is unclear that this topic is notable and distinct from Anti-Zionism . Marokwitz (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of VeggieTales characters. Courcelles 23:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people), particularly WP:NACTOR. Article has been tagged with ((BLP sources)) and ((Notability)) since 2010. Article is mainly about VeggieTales, which has its own article. HairyWombat 22:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. This individual fails WP:GNG as he has not been featured in any reliable third-party media. He also fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a competitive first-team match for a fully professional club, nor has he been the head coach for such a team in such a match. – PeeJay 21:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Added an article published in Soccer Coach International, which is a globally distributed Soccer Coaching Publication, http://soccercoachinginternational.com/sci_en/. Ben has been twice published here and this is an independent journal. The 2nd article proposes a previously unpublished concept of the soccer player as the syllabus, a shift in youth coaching from the previous approach of the syllabus being the same for all. The following educational articles support such an approach:
http://www.postgradolinguistica.ucv.cl/dev/documentos/0,680,Syllabus%20Design.pdf http://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/1662/03.CHAPTER_3.pdf;jsessionid=60AF46566C80BEFA3D039C003D998B0C.tdx2?sequence=4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georg3Hartman (talk • contribs) 07:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. J04n(talk page) 11:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article, in the current state, has several issues ... issues that originally led me to tag this article with a ((Db-g11)) tag due to the article, in the current state, seeming like a self-promotion. Here are a couple of the issues this articles faces that led me to that conclusion:
...but since this article doesn't seem to look like a promotion to at least one editor, let's discuss. Steel1943 (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete as a copyvio. -DJSasso (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like possible plagiarism, poorly written. Binko71100 (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Deleted as a copyvio already. -DJSasso (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Complete plagiarism. (WP:Plagiarism) Binko71100 (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 21:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a National Express, given that one would have to refer to their web site to confirm what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. A merger with National Express Coventry may also be a possibility. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 18:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously soft deleted. This BLP has been repeatedly created by its subject. The subject, however, is not the topic of any substantial coverage in any reliable source (WP:GNG, WP:BASIC). There's no indication WP:ACADEMIC is met either. JFHJr (㊟) 17:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 22:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Part of a large series of unreferenced micro-stubs about football teams in Iran which have not received significant coverage or played at a national level in order to meet notability guidelines. c.f. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ara-e Gharb Kermanshah F.C.. This nomination covers a total of nine articles, for which I believe identical deletion criteria apply. C679 16:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Eight related articles listed below per nomination:
C679 16:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 22:21, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia isn't travel guide - this belongs on Wikivoyage, not here Davey2010 Talk 16:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No notability expressed, and apparent conflict of interest as per m:User:COIBot/XWiki/soleit.ru — billinghurst sDrewth 16:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Let me comment on conflict of interest as per m:User:COIBot/XWiki/soleit.ru:
Should I remove some links to avoid conflict of interest mentioned above?
Also Aidoo is just another one web framework which will be opensource shortly. Why not to save information about it in Wikipedia? — Leonid Lapidus 18:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves
What RS should we have for article about Aidoo except the website and developer website? — Leonid Lapidus 10:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone wants to transwiki this or any similar pages I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 22:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia isn't travel guide - this belongs on Wikivoyage, not here Davey2010 Talk 15:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep all correct information and change out of date information and bring up-to date, NOTE: all this information can not be put on North Yorkshire due to this long list would clog up that page, therefore this page was put into place. DF2 (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC) - Comment stricken as DF2 is banned sock, retained for context of Blue Square Thing's reply below. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 11:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone wants to transwiki this or any similar pages I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 22:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia isn't travel guide - this belongs on Wikivoyage, not here Davey2010 Talk 15:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PROD contested by article creator, no rationale given. This person fails WP:GNG (as he has not received significant coverage) and also fails WP:NFOOTBALL (has not played or managed in a fully-professional league). GiantSnowman 15:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. The discussion concerning possible merge options may certainly continue on the appropriate talkpages. J04n(talk page) 22:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List of Big Brother 2 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 3 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 4 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 5 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 6 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 7 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 8 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 9 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 11 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 12 housemates (UK)
List of Big Brother 13 housemates (UK)
Per precedent @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 10 housemates (UK), all other lists are hereby nominated with the same rationale applying. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 15:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable short film, produced by a non-notable studio. No awards, no coverage whatsoever in proper reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. Plenty of promotional fluff in there as well. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Laufilitonga. J04n(talk page) 17:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend deletion or redirecting to Laufilitonga. Article does not establish notability for the subject. The article is a genealogical entry and in accordance with WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTINHERITED, Wikipedia is not the place to present this information. The sources provided for this article equate to personal hobbyist websites, which do not meet the threshold for reliability. While I don't have access to the book, as a novel based on apparently real people, we do not know what is true or false, creative nonfiction or documentation and factual. Cindy(talk to me) 21:38, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you check most numbers, almost all have the same claims yet none have proven their notability through sources.... this one definitely not notable. Jeremy112233 (talk) 04:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Seems to be simply a mid-level manager at a big company. GeorgeLouis (talk) 03:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 02:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, especially since its one "notable" film, mentioned as a redirect possibility, was deleted. Shii (tock) 06:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. The one films it has made (as listed on imdb) is 9 minutes long, received only a handful of reviews and have not won any awards. It's next film is not out yet. Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 13:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedied already. Peridon (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No references provided to support this claims, need references to prove this person is notable. Jeremy112233 (talk) 04:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable mom-and-pop (or girl-and-boyfriend) selfpublishing company Staszek Lem (talk) 02:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
References are need to prove this person is notable. Jeremy112233 (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability requirements not met. Sources are not up to WP:RS standards. Two refs to the site itself, one to another blog, one to a Reddit comment, one to an attorney's self-published website. This leaves a single mention in an ABA Journal blog post as the most reliable source. This blog has simply not achieved sufficient notability for a stand-alone article yet. Yworo (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Aberdeen, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has only two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:50, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Scotland, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has only one sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in West Yorkshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has only two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep People keep saying WP is not a travel guide - but travel guides are things which say "go to this hotel, eat here, entertain yourself here". These pages are lists of factual information, no different from the repertoire of Opera North in the 1950s or lists of episodes of Family Guy almost-instinct 22:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in West Sussex given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:55, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Warwickshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in South Yorkshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has only one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Staffordshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Nottinghamshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Merseyside, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in East Sussex, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Hertfordshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Lancashire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Devon, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Berkshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Cumbria, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Rename.. This discussion garnered more interest than similar discussions. Will rename to Bus transport in Cheshire and cut the schedule out. Although there was support for this name change it was not overwhelming, so if folks believe the subject is still not notable a second AfD would not be inappropriate. J04n(talk page) 12:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus Cheshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has four sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 13:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Týr (band). Black Kite (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NALBUM. cannot see it meeting any of its criteria. LibStar (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Wiltshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to FoolishPeople. Biographies with many citations fall into two categories; the obviously notable, and the probably-not-notable-but-citing-everything-to-get-over-the-bar type. This clearly falls into the second category. This is an odd AfD because we have few actual !votes but a lot of discussion. The analysis by Singularity42 is notable, however, and I believe shows that the subject has practically no individual notability. It would have been easy to close this AfD as "no consensus", but I suspect we would have just ended up with another AfD at some point. By closing as Merge, we can keep any useful information, and the edit history, so that the article can be re-created if the subject clearly passes the BIO notability bar in the future. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:BIO. The company he founded, FoolishPeople is arguably notable. But notability is not inherited. The reviews of the works cited don't go out of their way to note the subject in any detail. Singularity42 (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Newport, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Isle of Wight, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it has no sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Wrexham, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Berkshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Cardiff, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article alone is not notable and should be either deleted or merged into the Southern Vectis article. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Wakefield, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move info to Wikitravel - I agree this does not belong in Wikipedia. The information in this article would be better to be in Wikitravel. I commend the author of this, as this is a very comprehensive list. If the end result of this AfD discussion is to delete, I will make sure myself the info gets moved. Bill Pollard (talk) 12:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from West Lancashire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from South Ribble, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Rossendale, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Preston, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Pendle, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Wigan, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:28, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Tameside, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Stockport, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 12:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Salford, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Rochdale, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Oldham, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:55, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Manchester, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Leeds, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Kirklees, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Hyndburn, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Ripley, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Matlock, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Glossop, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Ilkeston, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:38, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Heanor, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Amber Valley, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Swadlincote, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Derby, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has two sources. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Oxfordshire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus in Gloucestershire, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only has one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If anyone want to transwiki this or any similar recently deleted page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 12:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a travel guide. It is not clear that this article could ever be particularly useful to people interested in taking a bus to or from Brighton & Hove, given that one would have to refer to the bus company's web site to confirm that the bus service still exists, what days it runs, what time it runs, and where to get on the bus. Also it only one source. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 11:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 00:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable venue. Non-reliable references. No suggestion of importance whatsoever. Author has been advised that the notability guidelines in English Wikipedia is very different than German Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep it says in the notability guidlines that notability is not temperary. This venue once had mass coverage in the 1980s when top musical acts performed there. Evangp (talk) 10:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was soft delete. Due to low community involvement in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason. J04n(talk page) 12:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article has existed practically untouched since August 2005. I really don't think Wikipedia needs an article about an individual toolbar. It may meet WP:N, as lots of online help articles would have been written about it, but I think WP:IINFO starts to apply here. Any relevant information about this toolbar should be placed in the Microsoft Office article, or the article about a specific version of Office (since this toolbar has not been present in the last three releases of Microsoft Office) - however the fact that nothing has been said about this toolbar for 7 years is not encouraging. — This, that and the other (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The discussion about possibly renaming or redirecting can certainly continue on the talkpage. J04n(talk page) 13:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence here whatsoever that he is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Though I welcome evidence I'm wrong? Jeremy112233 (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
unremarkable music video. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:10, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 no credible claim of significance or importance. JohnCD (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does this group really exist? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 05:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 02:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why the page should be deleted? Because it is a copy of the most essential information from MichelinTM guides for this this area. Specifically the article has two copies, one in the body and once again at the bottom, of a lists of restaurants which are been compiled from from the Michelin Guides to Great Britain & Ireland. These lists are the essence of these guides and so this constitute a Blatant Copyright Violation. I therefore ask that the page be deleted ASAP.
CPVIO (talk) 05:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Speedy Keep: No copyright vio. under American law, and no valid reason for deletion proposed:
EDIT: In light of subsequent comments, especially that of Moonriddengirl, I'm not so sure that this is a clear cut situation anymore. --Mike Agricola (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A final comment:
Request close and keep: Based on this being entirely the wrong forum for this discussion. Ironically it was because I typed WP:CPVIO that I discovered Wikipedia:Copyright problems which deals specifically with these types of matter and seems to have numerous experts on the subject who have used their own usernames for years. I suggest we move the discussion there. Miyagawa (talk) 09:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 22:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that this school is notable. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. This looks on the face of it to be a no consensus case, but two of the delete !votes are from single purpose accounts, and another is plainly incorrect with regard to the sources. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
GNG is non existant for an encyclopedia. This is not a consumer website listing every business (and associated complaints) little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 04:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established, and no evidence found for it to be met: no major publications, awards or projects. ELEKHHT 04:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:SYNTH. Of course politics and religion are deeply related, including neo-fascist politics. However this article seems to be a synthesis where anything political, from George Bush to Imperial Japan, that someone has called "neo-fascist" and that has some kind of relationship to something religious is included. No secondary sources are provided that show the overall concept of the article has been noted elsewhere than WP. Kitfoxxe (talk) 02:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:POVFORK of Coat of arms of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Fails WP:ORG. reddogsix (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The reason you aren't getting ghits or Gnews is because none of the relevant news articles or hits are in English- they are mainly in Arabic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.236.205 (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC) I do not think this should be deleted... I have ghits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.142.128 (talk) 23:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I used to live in Doha, and I remember the big licensing scandal for this company. It is important in Qatars business history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.236.205 (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As above, Muntazah Oryx represents an important company in Qatar's business history and Qatar's future. It is certainly more relevant and important than many other business articles on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.236.205 (talk) 06:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 22:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unpublished book, only available sources are primary or self published, does not meet WP:BKCRIT. Tgeairn (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of last surviving veterans of military insurgencies and wars. The history will remain intact in case anyone wants to merge any of it. J04n(talk page) 13:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from arguably being a case of WP:BIO1E (the one event being outliving all the other veterans of the conflict), this article fails WP:N's coverage of requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent third-party sources. Polish Wikipedia has a few sources, but they are all brief mentions that contain trivial details and nothing that suggests that Meisel has received extensive coverage or could sustain a full Wikipedia article; anything from those sources could easily be incorporated into his section in List of last surviving veterans of military insurgencies and wars. I don't think redirect would be helpful here, although the Wilhelm Meisel hatnote could be altered to point to the aforementioned list. Canadian Paul 23:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was KEEP. SpinningSpark 15:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indiscriminate list. A historical "power" is basically any state that once existed and does no longer. We have categories for this kind of thing. —Srnec (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]