This article is missing information about other Greek city states besides Athens. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page. (March 2017)

Ancient Greek law consists of the laws and legal institutions of ancient Greece.

The existence of certain general principles of law is implied by the custom of settling a difference between two Greek states, or between members of a single state, by resorting to external arbitration. The general unity of Greek law shows mainly in the laws of inheritance and adoption, in laws of commerce and contract, and in the publicity uniformly given to legal agreements.[1]

While its older forms can be studied by the laws of Gortyn, its influence can be traced in legal documents preserved in Egyptian papyri and it may be recognized as a consistent whole in its ultimate relations to Roman law in the eastern provinces of the Roman empire, with scholars in the discipline of comparative law comparing Greek law with both Roman law and the primitive institutions of the Germanic nations.[1]

Historical sources

There is no systematic collection of Greek laws; the earliest notions of the subject are derived from Homeric poems. The works of Theophrastus, On the Laws, included a recapitulation of the laws of various barbaric as well as of the Grecian states, yet only a few fragments of it remain.[1] The earliest Greek Laws date back to the code of laws by Draco and Solon who both had an immense impact on early Greek Law.


Incidental illustrations of the Athenian law are found in the Laws of Plato, who describes it without exercising influence on its actual practice. Aristotle criticized Plato's Laws in his Politics, in which he reviews the work of certain early Greek lawgivers. The treatise on the Constitution of Athens includes an account of the jurisdiction of the various public officials and of the mechanics of the law courts, and thus enables historians to dispense with the second-hand testimony of grammarians and scholiasts who derived their information from that treatise.[1]

Other evidence for ancient Athenian law comes from statements made in the extant speeches of the Attic orators, and from surviving inscriptions.[1]

Procedural laws


Historians consider the Ancient Athenian law broadly procedural and concerned with the administration of justice rather than substantive.[2] Athenian laws are typically written in the form where if an offense is made, then the offender will be punished according to said law,[3] thus they are more concerned with the legal actions which should be undertaken by the prosecutor, rather than strictly defining which acts are prosecutable.[4] Often, this would have resulted in juries having to decide whether the offense said to have been committed was in fact a violation of the law in question.[5]

Development of Ancient Greek law

The earliest Greek law to survive is the Dreros inscription, a seventh century BC law concerning the role of kosmos.[6] This and other early laws (such as those which survive in only fragmentary form from Tiryns) are primarily concerned not with regulating people's behaviour, but in regulating the power of officials within the community.[7] These laws were probably set up by the élites in order to control the distribution of power among themselves.[8]


One of the earliest dateable events in Athenian history is the creation of the Draconian law code by Draco, c.620 BC.[9] However, the homicide law is the only one known due to it surviving the Solonian reforms.[9] The law seems to have distinguished between premeditated and involuntary homicide, and provided for the reconciliation of the killer with the family of the dead man.[10] The homicide law of Draco was still in force in the fourth century.[10] Though the rest of the code is unknown, it was by Athenian tradition known to have been very harsh.[10]

The Athenian law codes set forth by Draco were completely reformed by Solon, who was the archon of Athens c.593 BC. Solon's reforms included reforms to land ownership and the cancellation of debts and the abolition of slavery for those who were born Athenian.[11] Yet, attributing specific legal innovations and reforms to Solon and his successors is notoriously difficult because there was a tendency in ancient Athens to ascribe laws to Solon irrespective of the date of enactment.[12]

Courts and judicial system

Along with the official enforcement of the law in the courts in the Grecian states, justice and social cohesion were collectively enforced by society at large,[13] with informal collective justice often being targeted at elite offenders.[14]


Ancient Greek courts were cheap and run by laypeople. Court officials were paid little, if anything, and most trials were completed within a day, with private cases done even quicker. There were no court officials, no lawyers, and no official judges. A normal case consisted of two litigants, arguing if an unlawful act had been committed. The jury would decide whether the accused was guilty, and should he be guilty, what the punishment will be. In Athenian courts, the jury tended to be made of the common people, whereas litigants were mostly from the elites of society.[14]

In the Athenian legal system, the courts have been seen as a system for settling disputes and resolving arguments, rather than enforcing a coherent system of rules, rights and obligations.[15] The Prytaneion court was responsible for trialing random residents, animals, and inanimate objects for homicide, and it is assumed that it was in order to ensure that Athens was free of blood-guilt for the crime.[15]

The Athenian court system was dominated by men. The jury was all-male,[16] and it has been argued that the Athenian court seemed to have been remarkably unwilling to allow any female presence in the civic space of the lawcourt itself.[17]

Public and private cases

In Ancient Athens, there were two types of lawsuit. Public prosecutions, or graphai, were heard by juries of 501 or more, increasing in increments of 500 jurors, while private suits, or dikai, were heard by 201 or 401 jurors, depending on the amount of money at stake.[18] Juries were made up of men selected from a panel of 6,000 volunteers, who were selected annually and were required to be full citizens, aged over 30.[19] Juries were paid a small fee from the time of Pericles, which may have led to disproportionate numbers of poor and elderly citizens working on juries.[20]


Ostracism was an Athenian practice done in an attempt to preserve democracy. This practice began shortly after the first invasion of Greece during the Greco-Persian Wars around 490 BC. The idea of ostracisms was spurred after the earlier tyrant of Athens, Hippias, accompanied the Persians to the Battle of Marathon with hopes of regaining control of Athens. The goal of this procedure was to prevent anyone with too much influence becoming a tyrant in Athens, such as Hippias. Annually, a vote would take place to decide if Athens was in danger of possible tyranny. If there was a majority of those who said yes, another vote would occur two months later to decide which person was to be ostracized. If a man received over 6,000 ostracons with their name scratched on them, they were to be placed into exile for a minimum of ten years.[21]



Main article: Xenelasia

Xenelasia was the practice in Sparta of expelling foreigners and discouraging citizens from traveling outside.



The Athenians chose a different way when it came to the court system. They used different proposals in each type of decision made through various cases. In the Athenian legal system, there were no professional lawyers, though well-known speechwriters such as Demosthenes composed speeches which were delivered by, or on behalf of others. These speechwriters have been described as being as close as a function of a modern lawyer as the Athenian legal system would permit.[22]

It has been argued that the rhetorical and performative features evident in surviving Classical Athenian law court speeches are evidence that Athenian trials were essentially rhetorical struggles which were generally unconcerned with the strict applicability of the law.[23] It is also said that orators constructing stories played a much more significant role in Athenian court cases than those of the modern day, due to the lack of modern forensic and investigatory techniques which might provide other sources of evidence in the Athenian courtroom.[24]

See also


  1. ^ a b c d e Sandys 1911, p. 501.
  2. ^ Carey 1998, p. 93.
  3. ^ Carey 1998, p. 95.
  4. ^ Carey 1998, p. 96.
  5. ^ Carey 1998, p. 99.
  6. ^ Osborne 2009, p. 174.
  7. ^ Osborne 2009, pp. 174–6.
  8. ^ Osborne 2009, p. 176.
  9. ^ a b Andrewes, p. 370.
  10. ^ a b c Andrewes, p. 371.
  11. ^ Andrewes, pp. 381–382.
  12. ^ Carey 1998, p. 106.
  13. ^ Forsdyke 2008, p. 6.
  14. ^ a b Forsdyke 2008, p. 7.
  15. ^ a b Davidson, James (1994). "Review of The Shape of Athenian Law by S.C. Todd". The Cambridge Law Journal. 53 (2): 384–385. doi:10.1017/s0008197300099104. S2CID 143829414.
  16. ^ Gagarin 2003, p. 204.
  17. ^ Goldhill, Simon (1994). "Representing Democracy: Women at the Great Dionysia". In Osborne, Robin; Hornblower, Simon (eds.). Ritual, Finance, Politics: Athenian Democratic Accounts Presented to David Lewis. Wotton-under-Edge: Clarendon Press. p. 360.
  18. ^ Hamel 2003, pp. 141–142.
  19. ^ Hamel 2003, p. 142.
  20. ^ Hamel 2003, p. 143.
  21. ^ "Birth of Democracy: Practice of Ostracism".
  22. ^ Cronin, James F. (1939). "Review of J.H. Vince "Demosthenes Against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton"". The Classical Journal. 34 (8): 491–492.
  23. ^ Gagarin 2003, pp. 198–199.
  24. ^ Gagarin 2003, p. 206.


Further reading