The result was merge to IBM System/360 architecture. Spartaz Humbug! 17:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable mini-essay; contested prod. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge but I'm not quite sure where to merge it to. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 23:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD; original rationale was "Non-notable football club, written like an advert as well." GiantSnowman 23:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD; original rationale was "Non-notable youth player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL." GiantSnowman 23:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article describing an obscure dangerous materials handling standard does not appear to be on a notable topic. The article seems to have been one of a series of articles on similar obscure topics created as part of an university project - this has been discussed at: WP:AWNB#New articles on the handling of dangerous materials. I nominated this article for prod deletion, but this was disputed. Nick-D (talk) 23:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not now describe a person who qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. The article currently reads more as advertising than encyclopedia. Avocats (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability? Why 30 HRs prior to the All Star break? Is this some grand achievement that is widely recognized? No, it's just a round number. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He has only just won Britain's Got Talent, which is the only thing he is notable for doing, therefore WP:BLP1E applies. –anemoneprojectors– 22:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prod was "contested" (in other words it was removed without a reason). The article contents are located on the individual season pages. This skittle article is not necessary. —Mike Allen 22:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet produced play with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Newly written play without even a proposed production date and certainly no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:26, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked for sources for this website but the best available are [1] [2] and being mere mentions I don't think the site meets WP:WEB. The Scholar search could have something more, but the articles are behind paywalls - frankie (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Although previously kept I think our current standards in WP:POLITICIAN would indicate that this is a non-notable local politician. There is not significant press coverage. Tassedethe (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced BLP from 2006, created by an SPA. Subject is a Slovenian director, Slovenian WP his only slightly more material, but still no sources. Google isn't forthcoming. If reliable sources show up at some point, the article can be recreated, but we shouldn't create biographies and hope notability shows up. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 19:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and having only ever played in the non-fully-pro Faroese League, he also fails WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PROD removed by IP, no reason stated. Fails WP:FOOTY as he has not played at a fully-professional level. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant media coverage beyond the routine WP:NTEMP stuff. --Jimbo[online] 16:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article consists of How-To information. RJFJR (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PROD concern: Player fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. The stats listed are false. He has only played with Lens' reserve team in the French amateur leagues. Mephtalk 15:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). User:Russavia User talk:Russavia 20:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable actor who appeared in some TV shows. I am unable to find reliable source coverage. But I do not speak Russian, so there may be such sources in Russian. Barring the inclusion of those, the article does not seem justified, as she fails both WP:GNG and most of her roles according to her IMDB listing (which is not a reliable source per se, but all we have to work with) appear to be peripheral bit parts. The only one that may be a bigger role that I can find is this one: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1601883/ But I did a search on that name and her name and didn't find any news coverage, etc. I should also note that show was produced in 2010 according to IMDB, and she died in 2009 according to the Wikipedia article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page was recently nominated for AfD, but the nomination was closed as "moot" due to sockpuppetry. The article itself is about a television news music theme which has reportedly been used by various television stations. However, the article is predominantly unsourced, and several of the sources are personal or fan-type pages which would not normally be considered reliable sources. The article also appears to violate copyright by including the entire lyric to the theme song. Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was userfied - needs some coverage before this can be hosted in mainspace. Spartaz Humbug! 17:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Film is in development and not yet filming. Fails WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This list violates our policy on fictional content, as it is plot only coverage. The political factions within Mobile Suit Gundam SEED is not an encyclopaedic topic as there is no significant secondary coverage in reliable sources about it, resulting it in failing the general notability guideline. Anthem 09:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not yet established for this actress. Does not meet the general notability guidelines or topical notability guidelines for entertainers. Film roles appear to be that of an extra, credited on IMDb as "Girl at bar" and "Juvenile delinquent". Clearly has a lot of ambition, however, notability is not yet established, inline with the criteria accepted by Wikipedia. (As a side note, I've seen this article pass through before, but I can't remember the name under which it was previously created.) Cind.amuse 08:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close. Putting this up for AfD 39 minutes after a new user creates the page is way too early for an AfD. Cheyenne probably is not notable, but lets give the new user a chance and not a stick to the head. Bgwhite (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PROD declined. Concern was: Unreferenced. Has not played in a fully professional league team. Fails WP:NFOOTY Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per G3 by Hadal. (NAC) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 04:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this person even exists. There is another Earl of Suffolk at the time when he is supposed to be one. CS Larae (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The book fails all 5 criteria of WP:NBOOK and a large part of the article had been directly taken from the author's preface in the book. A Google search did not turn up any awards for the book or the author, and none of the other 3 criteria of WP:NBOOK have been met. Inks.LWC (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable secondary character in a movie and book. The article is currently nearly all plot. No real-world commentary on the importance of the character or scholarly discussion of the character. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Gilbert Public Schools. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't meet the general notability guideline. There's a significant straight-up copy of a press release that doesn't belong too. Raymie (t • c) 05:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass WP:ALBUM: album was released by non-notable band. (Wikipedia does not have an article for the band) Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm adding the article "Stanem sa", a single from this album, to this nomination. It asserts to having the most expensive music video made in Slovakia, but I've not been able to verify this. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to WWE Money in the Bank. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Future event that does not yet have significant coverage in independent reliable sources WP:GNG. I tried to redirect it [14] but that was reverted as "vandalism" [15] Chzz ► 04:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Previous consensus was to redirect to List of Diary of a Wimpy Kid characters. I see no reason why not to follow the existing consensus as no new arguments have been presented. If the redirection gets reversed without evidence of a change in consensus, feel free to ask an administrator for protection. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article is currently nearly all plot, with a minor blurb that could be merged into the article for the film before deletion. Character does not seem to have received any significant coverage or discussion, and the quality of the sources used in the article does not seem up to our guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Diary of a Wimpy Kid characters. Spartaz Humbug! 17:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article is currently nearly all plot, with a minor blurb that could be merged into the article for the film before deletion. Character does not seem to have received any significant coverage or discussion, and the quality of the sources used in the article does not seem up to our guidelines. Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We don't make articles on everything that could be made. Right now this is too soon. If released, it might pass the notability guidelines for films, but until then it is all guesses. Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 17:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page is completely unsourced and nonsensical. It gives little information about the topic. Ryan Vesey (talk) 04:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Diary of a Wimpy Kid (series). Spartaz Humbug! 17:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am adding the recreated article: Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Stress Adventure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) CTJF83 04:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem to pass the guidelines for books. Book has not been published yet, so falls under WP:CRYSTAL. May qualify for a merger or redirect to the series, if something can be cited. Previous deletion debate speedily closed, but the speedy close rationale does not apply here. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 17:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a directory and not a dictionary and this list will probably never be comprehensive. All those various name should already be included in the particular articles and redirects and I see not point in listing them separately De728631 (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (PRO) that the article contains useful, factual information of real value to some readers, and
- (CON) that the content should be better sourced and the coverage should be more consistent.
IMO the PRO trumps the CON. If we were to delete all Wikipedia articles that should be better sourced, a significant chunk of Wikipedia would be gone. An article such as this one, being geographical & historical & multi-lingual, cannot be easy to edit. Gradual quality improvement can happen but not rapid transformation. Patience is required. Also the content is going to accumulate gradually so consistent coverage across the board is a pipedream. IMO. Wanderer57 (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not WP:NOTABLE. - Kittybrewster ☎ 03:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. I am withdrawing this AfD nomination - I hadn't found those BBC refs. I hope that between the editors here and myself, we can get this article properly referenced (although I'll need to work on it in a few days when I am next off work) PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:50, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Rugby league - he has played 2 games, none of which meet those criteria (see QRL player profile and Rugby League Project Matches played. Although his name appears a lot on GNews, the coverage is basically confirming his position as coach, but does not appear to indicate meeting notability criteria, or the significant coverage as required by the general notability guidelines. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing here that shows notability. The bio is copied from a US gov-PD, source, like a great many military bios; many of them have been for arguably notable people, but this is not--"the .. to perform a cataract extraction via phacoemulsification in the history of the RAF Lakenheath hospital " is very far from it. DGG ( talk ) 03:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. No quorum; no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability in question, reference provided is hard to understand if its a blog or news. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 04:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced article with no obvious notability Sitush (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge with List of shopping malls in India, which I've been looking after for a while. I'd be happy to babysit said section, in its rightful place. No need for this to be standalone. Doesn't server visitors. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Nom comment - I am content to see this merged as per above comments as I am confident it will be in good hands. Wasn't aware of the Indian list, for which my apologies. - Sitush (talk) 16:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC) Struck out because the primary proposed list maintainer is now unhappy with the content as it stands - Sitush (talk) 16:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to My Gym Partner's a Monkey. Spartaz Humbug! 17:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Only 19 sources. This article does not have enough notably, and no real world or third party coverage to provide it. JJ98 (Talk) 01:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly, this article does not have enough notability, and no real world coverage to provide it. JJ98 (Talk) 01:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. There is certainly no way this can lead to a delete outcome. There is some support for merger, but this should be taken further on the talk page. Stifle (talk) 08:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm a Doctor Who fan, and yes, I know what this is talking about - but I'm in bafflement as to why there is an encyclopedia entry about what is ultimately one fan's theory about a minor continuity issue (and the paltry reference bears witness to that). The fan himself actually talks about it on the talk page and is amazed himself that this article exists. The whole thing is about something that isn't real and was never made - it exists only in some Doctor Who fans heads. This article may have been there a while, but maybe it's time for some of these over-zealous fans to wake up and smell the coffee? --Tuzapicabit (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list, and I don't think its a viable redirect either. Some of the individual products may be article-worthy, but not a list. NoleloverTalk/Contribs 01:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This MMA fighter has competed in only a handful of professional fights, none for a notable organization. His biggest "claim to fame" is appearing on an MMA-based reality TV show in which he injured both his eyes such that he said he will never be able to compete again. Google search provides links to his own web page, fight records, and some videos, but no/few notable pages. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
MMA fighter with no notable fights with no notable organizations. His only "claim to fame" is an appearance in a MMA related reality TV show in which he was injured. Google search provides fight records and not much else. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He is an up and coming fighter who owns and coaches at a well respected MMA Training camp in the UK. Also I will be adding much more and will keep in very up to date. Please do not delete. --Dargla (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Please do some WP:BEFORE next time, not a hoax (non-admin closure) CTJF83 00:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems like a hoax, the reference says nothing about the title. Baseball Watcher 00:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Oops, first hit the relist button by mistake Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No independent coverage. FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Michael Lerner (environmentalist) . T. Canens (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not encyclopaedic, reads like an advertisement, no notability and unreferenced. Benny Digital Speak Your Brains 10:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. The consensus below is that Stea meets the applicable notability guidelines. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
While he's had plenty of jobs none of them seem to reach beyond the level of background player or minor parts (e.g. "passenger on plane"). Eeekster (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Alexander Stea (born 17 October 1969) is an American dancer, choreographer, actor, singer, director and model. At the age of 20, he became widely known as the Assistant Choreographer and Dance Captain for Madonna’s Blond Ambition Tour and in the documentary about it, Madonna: Truth of Dare in 1990/1. On January 21, 1992, two dancers from the tour, Oliver S. Crumes, III and the late Gabriel Trupin, sued Madonna’s production company Boy Toy Inc., Miramax and Propaganda Films in Los Angeles Superior Court for fraud and invasion of privacy. When Stea, as Dance Captain, joined the suit, it became an item of international notoriety, to the extent that Stea appeared on the Maury Povich show to talk about the issue. The suit was withdrawn and settled amicably. [1][2][3][4][5]
SOURCES:
Sources pertaining to the lawsuit:
Sources pertaining to the role of Assistant Choreographer and Dance Captain for the Blond Ambition Tour:
Sources pertaining to when Mr. Stea joined the lawsuit and additional discussion:
Sources pertaining to the notoriety of the issue:
I am impressed by the research, writing and editing abilities of USER: Dr. Blofeld, USER: DGG, and am grateful for the discussion of Schmidt, because it has furthered my education on how wikipedia works and how the policies have been developed by the community. Gmccombs (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Gmccombs[reply]
Its a learning curve, you gradually become developed at researching and writing articles. The best way is for you to get on with editing, expand existing articles or create your own and ask one or two editors how to reference fully from google books and web sources. Best thing is to browse some articles on topics you are personally highly interested in and then look on the talk pages for wikiprojects which care for them. You can then join whatever project takes your fancy and they may help you if an active project. If you need any assistance in this feel free to contact me on my talk page. I will also show you how to add a automatic google book url into a full citation at the touch of a button.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has 18 sources for heaven's sake!!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are 4 areas, that perhaps other, more skilled editors could investigate to obtain properly recognized references:
Gmccombs (talk) 06:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Gmccombs[reply]
The result was deleted as hoax/vandalism
Tour for a band that doesn't have an article on here (the band, The Company, does not appear to have any relation to The Company Band). Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 00:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Peter Haynes. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, does not appear to be notable and has little content beyond plot details Jac16888 Talk 00:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable political figure. Only claim to fame is being chairman of a Democratic Party in Massachusetts. Rainbow Dash 00:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No sources given in a BLP, and I can't find any to satisfy WP:V. Even if there were sources to verify the roles, I can't see if they would meet WP:ENT. Not opposed to keep if someone has better reference-fu than me, but as it stands, it should go. Courcelles 05:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The station has only recently received one mainstream news article on it (and even that article [29] only talks about the subject providing shows for another station, not the station itself. Other than that, the only coverage this station/company seems to have received is on gaming websites, and most of that appears to be from self-published sources. Therefore, it is my belief that the subject fails the notability of WP:BROADCAST and WP:COMPANY Inks.LWC (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose this article been erased. This article should be kept on wikipedia because: Ginx TV have a number of tv channels in various countries so are quite a significant channel. They broadcast programming on challenge tv on saturdays and are now offering on demand services via bt vision. The reason most of the coverage this channel has got is from gaming websites is simple its because all of the content they make is about computer games so clearly all news coverage is going to be targeted at people who are interested in the channel. User: Jasmeet 181 cleaned up the article yesterday to remove the conflict of interest because of the company rep who was editing the article editing it called user:sarahginx. But considering the amount of tv channels they have live and other services they do they are very significant and the article is no different to any other article for a tv channel on here. So I strong oppose it been erased. The sources Jasmeet 181 added to the article yesterday are from reliable sources as well ofcom was one sources for example. Here is another article from the same website that mentions another of there channel launching http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2011/03/21/ginx-tv-launches-in-adriatic-region/ (Ruth-2013 (talk) 06:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]
The result was merge to Vernio. Spartaz Humbug! 17:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Below stub standard, not in English. DBaK (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No Consensus. The discussion, and in particular most of the "Keep" votes, was of fairly low quality but overall I cannot find a consensus to delete. While pointing at a google search is neither recommended nor sufficient it is not simply ignorable if the search contains the sources that it is alleged too. Thus despite the wording of the comments I see a basic dispute about whether the sources that can be found via google news are sufficient for an article or not. That is a straightforward no consensus close. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find sufficient RS independent coverage of this person to satisfy wp's notability requirements. Nor does he appear to satisfy wp:author. Others are welcome to seek indicia of notability. Tagged for lack of notability since 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I searched GNews for "daniel southern" + Christian and got lots of reliable news stories. The article needs sourcing, not deletion.I.Casaubon (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:18, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt this Max/MSP plugin is notable enough for a separate article in Wikipedia according to WP:GNG. Academically, it re-implements stuff that introduced elsewhere, and reviews of Max/MSP at best briefly mention it, e.g. [35] or not at all. [36] FuFoFuEd (talk) 08:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]