The result was Speedy delete as vandalism, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We already have an article called Road signs in Iran. The user created Road signs in Iran 2 and has started adding factual errors. Why are there signs in English when they use Arabic characters in Iran? The same user created an article called Road signs in Prazil. Firstly, Prazil is not a country and secondly, the user added Polish signs. — Fly by Night (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete − The subject of this article does not seem to meed WP:ORG. A Google search only returns self-published websites and MySpace pages. — Fly by Night (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
MMA fighter with only two professional fights. Fails WP:MMANOT, WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. TreyGeek (talk) 23:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, which happens to be what Wikipedia is not for. --Σ talkcontribs 23:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This subject has not shown any notability that is backed up by reliable sources independent of the subject. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable activist whose publicist has been pushing this shamelessly. Orange Mike | Talk 22:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declaration of interest on my part is that I know him personally, and can vouch for his authenticy.
His topic area is specialist, and prehaps he is the most sourced researcher into Romany culture and history out from Ian Hancock. Romany affairs may not be everyones cup of tea, or even notable in their own right to some people, so maybe judgement should be left to those who have an active interest in the field of Romany rights and research as to whether or not his entry is valid as a researcher and chonicler of Roma culture of note. Thats my tuppenceworth. Eiri Amach (talk) 10:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone who knows me from other sites on the web will be familiar with my poems on the Roma, and in particular about the Roma of Kosovo, and Mitrovica in particular. Some eight or more years ago, on the invitation of UNMIK, the human rights activist Paul Polansky led back to Kosovo some few hundred Romany refugees, who occupied aschoolhouse while trying to arrange accommodation. On the starting of the shool year they were moved to camps that they were told were to be for 99 days… those were a LONG 99 days… in over eight years a recknoned 77 died… thats right SEVENTY SEVEN, of lead poisoning, not counting the countless natural miscarraiges among the pregnant women. The camps are in the windcast of the local lead mines, the water is red with lead, red dust swirls around the camps when its dry… all born since they were set up are affected by lead poisoning, amny showing severe effects over the years. While some have been moved, more that have arrived are going into the same camps, and also into the old French Army barracks, and no-one is accountable for this tragedy. True, the Roma refused to go back to the old mahala… its understandable as the Albanians drove them out in the first place, as they attacked and drove out fellow muslims in the local Turk and Bosniak communities, the local Serb, Gorani and other minorities… I include some of the poems from the series here, and the rest can be read on my site. This is a silent genocide against the ONLY INNOCENTS in the Kosovo wars…"
Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
nonnotable tv producer. The article also appears to have been created by the subject --Kerowyn Leave a note 22:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, no sources. Members of other notable bands do not transfer notability, see WP:NOTINHERITED. Last AFD closed as keep back in 2006 with a very tenuous claim of "they've toured the UK". Five years later, the article's still unsourced. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 07:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Search in News and in Scholar returned nothing! In Books, it only returned directories that list schools, has been marked for refs for more than 3 years now. The ref provided is also of a directory website. A lot of it contains info that's not very encyclopedic. The Terminator p t c 21:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really know what qualifies something for notoriety or deletion, but a google search of "yeshiva tiferes yisroel" returns a couple of news stories. Google News didn't find them, but they exist.QueensQrew (talk) 07:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Opinions are divided about whether the event merits coverage in a separate article (and, sadly, among predictable lines, at least among the contributors whose usernames I recognize). My advice is to wait for a few months to determine whether the event attracts the "significant, non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time" as recommended by WP:EVENT. Sandstein 07:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined PROD. Fails WP:EVENTS, no significant coverage of any extension to justify standalone article. We are not a newspaper. A possible alternative to deletion is merge and redirect to List of armed conflicts and attacks, July – December 2011, but I am inclined to delete as there is no much to merge and most attacks in the list lack redirects. Cerejota (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This kind of event is rare and unusual. If this WP:CRIME has attracted this level of worldwide media attention, it is notable. Marokwitz (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per reasons brought up in the previous nominations, most importantly, that it does not pass WP:MUSIC. I Help, When I Can.[12] 05:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A neologism, a brand, a "movement"? It's not entirely clear what this article is talking about. The sources seem to indicate that it is something to do with fashion. In any event there doesn't seem to be much more here than hype which is attempting to appear to be notability. LadyofShalott 20:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ironholds (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. No assertion of notability - just another software company. No refs to support any notability. Principally an advertisement Velella Velella Talk 19:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:SNOW and being an obviously unsuitable topic for a Wikipedia article. The WordsmithTalk to me 07:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As with Dominant group (art) (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (art)), it is hard to discern the actual topic of this article. Although some of the content of this article might fit into an article such as Geology of the Moon, the article seems too intensely focused on the phrase "dominant group" to be meaningful. It seems to be original research and/or a synthesis. I recommend deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete by Peridon (talk · contribs) as G11, unambiguous advertising or promotion. (non-admin closure) Quasihuman | Talk 20:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious advertising for a non-notable company. Article creator is a single purpose account, and removed speedy delete tag. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ironholds (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A building project which hasn't progressed beyond planning in the two years since the article was created. WP:CRYSTAL Bazj (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The development is still in planning stages, and we do not exactly know the current status, whether it will be built or it will be cancelled. Any update has not been released regarding the construction of the project. We should wait in order to get any update of this project rather deleting the article.
Nabil rais2008 (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I'm giving more weight to the opinions of established editors, who conclude that the subject does not meet our inclusion requirements. Sandstein 07:53, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
advertising the job. can of truth 18:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep I created this page so obviously I vote to keep the article. Dr Jones was my professor and I have learned a lot from her. She has written several books and her unique approach is appreciated by millions of people worldwide. I am trying to collect more information and references and will be adding those here in the near future. I hope that others vote to keep this article so I can contribute more about this great professor and doctor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaree (talk • contribs)
If that is not enough to convince anyone that she is notable enough, lets take a look at her journals and books on topics ranging from Alcoholism to Psychology and her research on psychology of student teacher relationship. Forget the journals and books in which you may have to sift through few pages to find her name (which obviously no one here is going to bother to do) even if you just take a look at Google (seems like thats the only credibility indicator here) you will find more journals and books titled by her or about her than anyone here on AfD, not just that, lets take a look at few other dental professionals on wikipedia. Its clear that she is way more notable than half of that list, just by doing a google search and nothing else. I recommend that if you are not a professional in the industry you do not voice your opinion because your knowledge is going to be limited to what is on Google. I dont see a valid case presented by users who wish to delete this article. The stupid nomination and ignorant comments on her lack of notability without proper research do not offer any substantial evidence or advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xsyntheticx (talk • contribs) 22:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) — Xsyntheticx (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment I am not very knowledgeable on how wikipedia operates because I have not done many edits myself. It is going to take me some time to learn some of the stuff, in the mean time if there is someone reading this page who is knowledgeable enough to make contributions to Holistic Health and make a new page for Holistic Dentistry. I will be more than happy to help that person in collecting information or any other help that s/he may need.Xsyntheticx (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)— Xsyntheticx (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was speedy delete. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Still not notable, as he has not played in a fully pro league, and there is insufficient coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Should be elidgible for speedy deletion, but the G4 tag was removed by an IP. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to United States Senate election in Rhode Island, 2012. That seems to be the most consensual option. Can be recreated if he meets the normal notability criteria (i.e., substantial third party coverage). Sandstein 07:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable candidate for political office; no coverage found outside of the context of his campaign. MelanieN (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete - clear case of nn-website. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This blog doesn't seem to be notable at all, and the claim in the article that "[t]he site has earned numerous positive reviews" isn't backed up by any reliable sources. A quick Google search only reveals promotional links to the blog by the creator of it through comments on different sites and no third-party, positive reviews. Logan Talk Contributions 16:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unpublished literature lacking notability established through significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 16:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 21:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced WP:BLP fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:ANYBIO. I can't find substantial coverage of this artist in reliable sources. All I can find are a number of press releases and a single article in the Toronto Star[5]. I infer any notoriety he has achieved is due more to his association with Nash the Slash than his art. Pburka (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per consensus and as a poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Young actress with only minor roles - her parts aren't mentioned at all on the show pages - ie Gia Jenkins isn't even listed as a minor or recurring character on the I'm in the Band article. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to prove general notability. The-Pope (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was KEEP (obviously notable, no point in waiting longer) Zerotalk 07:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is person is not notable. This reads like a resume/advertisement. He does not appear to meet basic notability guidelines for Wikipedia. There doesn't appear to be significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. He appears to have business relationship with the few biased sources actually cited. --Mmhmm613 (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 16:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability unclear. Cannot find any English language references for the school. No interwiki. NickCT (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per the consensus that the subject is a current Minor League manager of a notable team, which contradicts the argument that the only assertion of notability is inherited. Steven Walling • talk 23:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherited. He is best known for being related to a famous person. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable show. Was deleted by a PROD earlier this year, and then recreated by a sock of a banned user. I'm bringing this here rather than reprodding or CSD because I'd rather there's a community discussion. GedUK 14:56, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. However, Jclemens's merge proposal has merit but first the episode list article should be reformated to allow episode summaries. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:GNG, for lack of third-party sources to substantiate stand-alone notability. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NALBUMS. 7 gnews hits merely confirms its existence [1]. no evidence of high chart listing Oo7565 (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:21, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an irrelevant article. Either user should have created it in sand box and would have search for references. Day000Walker (talk) 13:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG. Plus, this guy has not yet made any appearances in professional games. Luxic (talk) 13:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete article deleted by admin Acroterion with reason "Mass deletion of pages added by Greenencyclo". (Non-admin close) Monty845 15:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No notability per WP:NGRIDIRON Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 13:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete article deleted by admin Acroterion with reason "Mass deletion of pages added by Greenencyclo". (Non-admin close) Monty845 15:04, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No notability per WP:NGRIDIRON. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 13:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G11 advertisement. JohnCD (talk) 14:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No notability established. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 13:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. No indication that subject meets topical notability guidelines for authors. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 11:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok so this would mean I need to provide extra media coverage for Schwarzmann's book rather than just a publishers website? --Portions100 (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Epic Mickey. v/r - TP 16:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article that announces a game for sometime 2012, unsourced WP:RS. Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. WP:SPECULATION Ben Ben (talk) 11:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article suffers from multiple issues: WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:NOT#ESSAY. Though there have been comparisons between Greek and Hindu deities and mythological figures, in the current form, the article needs a complete rewrite to read like an encyclopaedia entry, rather than an OR essay. Redtigerxyz Talk 10:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a3, no substantive content. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for neologisms --Σ talkcontribs 08:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of WP:notability. Sources given are either not there or trivial mentions. Google does not show anything. noq (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a1, foreign language article that makes no sense when translated. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Machine translation (courtesy of Google):
Uelsopobia, is in the uelsobisa, ie the fact that the time will come when uadamiano (linear sense) in the environment, to appear, stop the personal development and slow - slow start in recession. For the first time the disease was observed in 2011 (he was described by two scientists, whose names and surnames of the name of the article's author, many mizizta due mizazshetsnoilad not think), umtkitsesi suppose it ukurnebelia, but certainly nothing to say, because the disease is the only such case in the old medical books in the display, therefore not to give further someone is always accompanied by a patient, this is what he says himself uelsopobi _ "nice to Kia, never be afraid but I have this fear of the opposite (perhaps because of) attempts have been continuously developed, it can be such things but before that he could not see, after he, himself of the disease are noticed, is Self-where I started, I think it better where it became my goal imaginable leed Behavior is the way that him and me between zero difference to be, in addition to gadavarchino humanity to create new ideals, humanoidebi and animals as possible mivuakhlovo each other (not daavakhlovo), make for what they had was unacceptable, but he wanted everyone to mirror chavakhedo They give a chance to improve after admianeb together leave this planet, and I elsi create a new seat, where animals, plants, "Adam's children," and animals Martyr, humanoidebi are eligible to apply. "The patients themselves to treatment and other ekimaa concluded that although uelsopobi sheshlia that, but it is not the truth, and it is very challenging to phobias, it is not (Mr. or PCs).
Wikipedia is not the place for essays and opinions. --Σ talkcontribs 07:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article was created by the subject in 2009 and has remained as an unreferenced biography of a living person ever since. I have been unable to find any reliable sources to support the subject's notability, which I find surprising, given the number of articles quoted. Only sources availble online appear to be self-published. This needs more eyes on it. CharlieDelta (talk) 07:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The value of Michael Jackson's estate is not worth an article of its own, especially this SOAPy screed about how "the mainstream media isn't reporting the true value of the Michael Jackson estate..." szyslak (t) 07:10, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, nothing on IMDB, no credible assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy A7 tag removed by a third party. Actress, only minor roles are asserted in the article. No references. Speedy delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 06:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Michigan_State_University#Student_organizations. v/r - TP 16:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This student group lacks notability. All that should be said about the group is already in the university article. Thus, no merge to do, thus, deletion. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: for the time being to merge relevant data into the Michigan State University article. I merged some data to the MSU article about the group being focused on helping people with disabilities, which wasn't in the MSU article before. This helped to clarify and be more specific regarding the group's focus in the MSU article.Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Deleted by Keegan (talk · contribs) per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth botte. (non-admin closure) Quasihuman | Talk 12:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy A7 template removed by an IP without addressing the issue. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted as promotional. Peridon (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evident signs of notability for this band. This article seems more of a promotion for the Mr. Hedges listed in the article. Only source given is Mr. Hedges website. Delete. Safiel (talk) 04:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a promotional piece for a non-notable musician. LadyofShalott 00:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources other than promotional material, reads like an ad. Kauffner (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. 08:43, 8 September 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Anthony S Adams" (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: more at User talk:A2adams - please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article was possibly created by the subject itself. There is very little citations that adhere to WP:RS and uses PR websites as sources.
Additional policy WP:NOTFACEBOOK applies as well. Phearson (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Advocating for removal from list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions discussion.
The result was delete. BigDom 06:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
nonnotable. The only notability claim is taking part in some contests. The mentioned contests he was not top winner. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 16:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined prod. Doesn't seem to be notable, no reliable third-party sources could be found to establish notability. SudoGhost 02:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you guys are deleting FlashPunk, but not Flixel. They're very similar products, and their pages are nearly identical, with the FlashPunk page having more content than the Flixel page. The FlashPunk and Flixel 3rd party references are nearly identical, too:
FP:
Official website
FlashPunk wiki at FlashGameDojo.com
Source on GitHub
Interview about FlashPunk at DigitalTools
Flixel:
Official website
Flixel wiki at FlashGameDojo.com
Source on GitHub
Official Flixel wiki on GitHub
Interview about Flixel v1.1 at DigitalTools.com
Only difference is Flixel's wiki is uploaded to. I could add FP's wiki if I wanted to, but I don't see how that's a 3rd-party reference as both wiki's are created by the library creators. What makes Flixel's article more notable than FP's? Bretboy129 (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article is noteworthy as a freeware, open-source program available on the Internet. The Flashpunk website has a forum with thousands of posts on it, which is noteworthy as to the significance the application. The article is also noteworthy as an encyclopedic reference regarding the availability of freeware and open source programs, and how the Internet continues to evolve. Furthermore, the Flixel article is a notable comparison, because both platforms are very similar, and the "Other Stuff Exists" webpage is an essay, not official Wikipedia policy. Northamerica1000 (talk) 12:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC) Also a Google search returns numerous websites regarding Flashpunk, which correlates with the subject's overall notability; click here for Google search results. Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I found zero sources for this term. The source in the article is offline. See Maximizing dictionary AfD also. SL93 (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 06:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I found zero sources for this term. The only source in the article is offline. See Minimizing dictionary AfD also. SL93 (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep as nomination withdrawn with no countervailing delete !votes. TerriersFan (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stub created in 2008. No secondary sources or indications of notability. Racconish Tk 02:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 16:07, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Commercial in nature. Notability is questionable, and lacks significance. Phearson (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 02:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable card game per WP:N Dengero (talk) 08:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to find significant coverage for this company. I only found a bunch of press releases on Google News. Joe Chill (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. v/r - TP 15:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable earthquake; no damage. Diego talk 20:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The user who proposed deletion of this article, Diego Grez, stated that the sole reason for the earthquake's lack of notability was "no damage". This is not the sole criterion upon which an earthquake is deemed to be considered notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
This article meets the [notability guideline] for [events] because there was widespread coverage of the earthquakes covered in diverse sources. A quick Google search shows that there are over 400 articles about these earthquakes, originating from various countries in various continents. Gfcvoice (talk) 23:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Already redirected.. v/r - TP 15:11, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not enough info for stand on its own, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Sauloviegas (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not assert notability. The book doesn't seem to be in print any more (Amazon only lists used copies) and the webpage we link to was last updated in 2005. I was not able to find any meaningful coverage through Google Books and Google Scholar. Matt Deres (talk) 21:42, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, WP:NFT, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for madeup things --Σ talkcontribs 00:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]