Active asteroids are small Solar System bodies that have asteroid-like orbits but show comet-like visual characteristics. That is, they show comae, tails, or other visual evidence of mass-loss (like a comet), but their orbit remains within Jupiter's orbit (like an asteroid). These bodies were originally designated main-belt comets (MBCs) in 2006 by astronomers David Jewitt and Henry Hsieh, but this name implies they are necessarily icy in composition like a comet and that they only exist within the main-belt, whereas the growing population of active asteroids shows that this is not always the case.
The first active asteroid discovered is 7968 Elst–Pizarro. It was discovered (as an asteroid) in 1979 but then was found to have a tail by Eric Elst and Guido Pizarro in 1996 and given the cometary designation 133P/Elst-Pizarro.
Unlike comets, which spend most of their orbit at Jupiter-like or greater distances from the Sun, active asteroids follow orbits within the orbit of Jupiter that are often indistinguishable from the orbits of standard asteroids. Jewitt defines active asteroids as those bodies that, in addition to having visual evidence of mass loss, have an orbit with:
Jewitt chooses 3.08 as the Tisserand parameter to separate asteroids and comets instead of 3.0 (the Tisserand parameter of Jupiter itself) to avoid ambiguous cases caused by the real Solar System deviating from an idealized restricted three-body problem.
The first three identified active asteroids all orbit within the outer part of the asteroid belt.
Some active asteroids display a cometary dust tail only for a part of their orbit near perihelion. This strongly suggests that volatiles at their surfaces are sublimating, driving off the dust. Activity in 133P/Elst–Pizarro is recurrent, having been observed at each of the last three perihelia. The activity persists for a month or several out of each 5-6 year orbit, and is presumably due to ice being uncovered by minor impacts in the last 100 to 1000 years. These impacts are suspected to excavate these subsurface pockets of volatile material helping to expose them to solar radiation.
When discovered in January 2010, P/2010 A2 (LINEAR) was initially given a cometary designation and thought to be showing comet-like sublimation, but P/2010 A2 is now thought to be the remnant of an asteroid-on-asteroid impact. Observations of 596 Scheila indicated that large amounts of dust were kicked up by the impact of another asteroid of approximately 35 meters in diameter.
P/2013 R3 (CATALINA-PANSTARRS) was discovered independently by two observers by Richard E. Hill using the Catalina Sky Survey's 0.68-m Schmidt telescope and by Bryce T. Bolin using the 1.8-m Pan-STARRS1 telescope on Haleakala. The discovery images taken by Pan-STARRS1 showed the appearance of two distinct sources within 3" of each other combined with a tail enveloping both sources. In October 2013, follow-up observations of P/2013 R3, taken with the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias on the island of La Palma, showed that this comet was breaking apart. Inspection of the stacked CCD images obtained on October 11 and 12 showed that the main-belt comet presented a central bright condensation that was accompanied on its movement by three more fragments, A,B,C. The brightest A fragment was also detected at the reported position in CCD images obtained at the 1.52 m telescope of the Sierra Nevada Observatory in Granada on October 12.
NASA reported on a series of images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope between October 29, 2013, and January 14, 2014, that show the increasing separation of the four main bodies. The Yarkovsky–O'Keefe–Radzievskii–Paddack effect, caused by sunlight, increased the spin rate until the centrifugal force caused the rubble pile to separate.
Some active asteroids show signs that they are icy in composition like a traditional comet, while others are known to be rocky like an asteroid. It has been hypothesized that main-belt comets may have been the source of Earth's water, because the deuterium–hydrogen ratio of Earth's oceans is too low for classical comets to have been the principal source. European scientists have proposed a sample-return mission from a MBC called Caroline to analyse the content of volatiles and collect dust samples.
Identified members of this morphology class include:
|1 Ceres||2.77||2.56||3.309||939||Water sublimation|
|3200 Phaethon||1.27||0.14||4.510||5.8||Thermal fracturing and/or desiccation cracking|
|6478 Gault||2.31||1.86||3.461||3.7||Rotational spin-up|
|7968 Elst–Pizarro (133P/Elst–Pizarro, P/1996 N2)||3.15||2.64||3.184||3.9||Impact/ice sublimation|
|(62412) 2000 SY178||3.15||2.90||3.197||5||Rubble pile disintegration|
|101955 Bennu||1.13||0.90||5.525||0.49||Thermal fracturing, volatile release, and/or impacts|
|118401 LINEAR (176P/LINEAR)||3.19||2.57||3.167||4||Impact/ice sublimation|
|(248370) 2005 QN173||3.07||2.37||3.192||3.6||Impact?|
|(300163) 2006 VW139 (288P)||3.05||2.44||3.204||1.8||Ice sublimation|
|233P/La Sagra (P/2005 JR71)||3.04||1.79||3.081||Impact/ice sublimation|
|238P/Read (P/2005 U1)||3.16||2.36||3.154||0.6||Impact/ice sublimation|
|259P/Garradd (P/2008 R1)||2.72||1.79||3.217||0.6||Sublimation/orbit change|
|311P/PANSTARRS (P/2013 P5)||2.19||1.95||3.661||0.5||Rubble pile disintegration|
|313P/Gibbs (P/2003 S10)||3.16||2.39||3.133||1.0||Ice sublimation|
|324P/La Sagra (P/2010 R2)||3.10||2.62||3.100||Impact/ice sublimation|
|331P/Gibbs (P/2012 F5)||3.00||2.88||3.228||Rubble pile disintegration|
|348P/PANSTARRS (P/2011 A5)||3.17||2.21||3.062|
|354P/LINEAR (P/2010 A2)||2.29||2.00||3.583||0.22||Impact|
|358P/PANSTARRS (P/2012 T1)||3.15||2.41||3.134||0.32||Impact/ice sublimation|
|367P/Catalina (P/2011 CR42)||3.51||2.53||3.042|
|P/2013 R3-A (Catalina-PANSTARRS)||3.03||2.20||3.184||0.2||Rubble pile disintegration|
|P/2013 R3-B (Catalina-PANSTARRS)||3.03||2.20||3.184||0.2||Rubble pile disintegration|
|P/2014 C1 (TOTAS)||3.04||1.69||3.077|
|P/2015 X6 (PANSTARRS)||2.75||2.29||3.319||Rubble pile disintegration or ice sublimation|
|P/2016 G1 (PANSTARRS)||2.58||2.04||3.367||0.2||Impact|
|P/2016 J1-A (PANSTARRS)||3.17||2.45||3.113||0.5||Impact/ice sublimation/rubble pile disintegration|
|P/2016 J1-B (PANSTARRS)||3.17||2.45||3.113||0.2||Impact/ice sublimation/rubble pile disintegration|
|P/2016 P1 (PANSTARRS)||3.23||2.28||2.967|
|P/2017 S5 (ATLAS)||3.17||2.18||3.092||0.5||Ice sublimation|
|P/2017 S8 (PANSTARRS)||2.78||1.68||3.040|
|P/2017 S9 (PANSTARRS)||3.16||2.20||3.087|
|P/2018 P3 (PANSTARRS)||3.01||1.76||3.096|
|P/2019 A3 (PANSTARRS)||3.15||2.31||3.100|
|P/2019 A4 (PANSTARRS)||2.61||2.36||3.365|
|P/2019 A7 (PANSTARRS)||3.19||2.68||3.103|
|P/2020 O1 (Lemmon-PANSTARRS)||2.65||2.33||3.376|
|P/2021 A5 (PANSTARRS)||3.05||2.62||3.147|
|P/2021 T3 (PANSTARRS)||3.02||2.06||3.090|
Castalia is a proposed mission concept for a robotic spacecraft to explore 133P/Elst–Pizarro and make the first in situ measurements of water in the asteroid belt, and thus, help solve the mystery of the origin of Earth's water. The lead is Colin Snodgrass, from The Open University in the UK. Castalia was proposed in 2015 and 2016 to the European Space Agency within the Cosmic Vision programme missions M4 and M5, but it was not selected. The team continues to mature the mission concept and science objectives. Because of the construction time required and orbital dynamics, a launch date of October 2028 was proposed.
On January 6, 2019, the OSIRIS-REx mission first observed episodes of particle ejection from 101955 Bennu shortly after entering orbit around the near-Earth asteroid, leading it to be newly classified as an active asteroid and marking the first time that asteroid activity had been observed up close by a spacecraft. It has since observed at least 10 other such events. The scale of these observed mass loss events is much smaller than those previously observed at other active asteroids by telescopes, indicating that there is a continuum of mass loss event magnitudes at active asteroids.