The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. (non-admin closure) jp×g 22:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article Jamie Anne Brown is simply a recreation of the article on Jamie Anne Allman (deleted three times for failing WP:BIO) under her maiden name. The information remains the same, the actor remains non-notable, and the secondary sources remain non-existent. Furthermore, the editor recreated this page after being warned not to do so by an administrator, here. He did so immediately following the third speedy deletion of Jamie Anne Allman. -- Lenky (talk) 11:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Procedural keep. This discussion was opened 14 years and 26 weeks ago minutes before Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercompact space was opened, and the result of the latter was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 22:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am writing a report on why this article should be deleted. First of all, this article states 8 facts, with some 100 references or so. Just delete the article. If this article is so important, then why don't you prove it by giving names of people who actually research this topic. No one does. Also, see the following five small reasons:
. Paracompactness and compactness ARE IMPORTANT topics and that is why no one has challenged them. However, supercompactness is not nearly as important and shouldn't be on an encyclopaedia such as this one. . This page has hardly anything. It has just stated facts. There are only a few points written on this page. It is a useless stub. . There is no point in using a WHOLE page to talk abou supercompactness. This article should be written under Alexander's Subbase Theorem. It has hardly any information. . There is someone who keeps removing this sign for speedy deletion and gives no reasons why he does this. Could an administrator please see that he stops?
Is supercompactness worthy of study? Was it a concept, so important that mathematicians were dumbstruck by it as soon as it was defined? The "Nagata-Smirnov Theorem" article is a good example of an article which shouldn't be deleted since it is extremely important. Is supercompactness even as important as the definition of a point? I may seem to be exaggerating but I am strong on my word. I understand that some people (such as "Oded"), have not been against me just for the sake of it. Others have said that this article shouldn't be deleted and given no reason to back this up. I am going to report this article to an administrator. Some articles that are extremely important have no references given to them (there are heaps of such articles in mathematics). Why do people waste their time give 800 references to such a negligible article? Please answer this.
In conclusion, this article is useless, and ineffective. It provides no applications in other elements of point-set topology and has only a few facts. This article is like wasting one whole piece of paper just for writing a single word. Someone should delete it. If not, I will.
Topology Expert (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
The result was Malformed nomination (this title seems to have never existed) (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 22:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.This tour have been confirmed. Poster for the tour has been released and few dates have been announced. Lecarlos (talk) 02:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. From Official Website. http://madonna.com/news/ http://madonna.com/news/news.php?uid=236 MADONNA STICKY & SWEET TOUR ITINERARY 2008
Showdate - City - Venue - On sale Date:
23-Aug - Cardiff Millennium Stadium - Fri. May 16
26-Aug - Nice Stade Charles Ehrmann - Fri. May 16
28-Aug - Berlin Olympic Stadium - Wed. May 21
02-Sept - Amsterdam Arena - Sat. May 17
04-Sept - Dusseldorf LTU Arena - Wed. May 21
06-Sept - Rome Olympic Stadium - Fri. May 23
09-Sept - Frankfurt Commerzbank Arena - Wed. May 21
11-Sept - London Wembley Stadium - Fri. May 16
20-Sept - Paris Stade de France - Fri. May 16
03-Oct - E. Rutherford Izod Center - Mon. May 19
06-Oct - New York City Madison Square Garden - Mon. May 19
07-Oct - New York City Madison Square Garden - Mon. May 19
15-Oct - Boston TD BankNorth Garden - Sat. May 17
18-Oct - Toronto Air Canada Centre - Sat. May 24
22-Oct - Montreal Bell Centre - Sat. May 24
26-Oct - Chicago United Center - Sat. May 17
30-Oct - Vancouver BC Place Stadium - Sat. May 24
01-Nov - Oakland Oracle Arena - Sun. June 1
04-Nov - San Diego Petco Park - Sun. June 1
06-Nov - Los Angeles Dodger Stadium - Sun. June 1
08-Nov - Las Vegas MGM Grand Garden Arena - Sat. May 31
11-Nov - Denver Pepsi Center - Sat. May 31
16-Nov - Houston Minute Maid Park - Sat. May 31
19-Nov - Philadelphia Wachovia Center - Mon. June 2
22-Nov - Atlantic City Boardwalk Hall - Mon. June 2
24-Nov - Atlanta Philips Arena - Sat. May 31
26-Nov - Miami Dolphin Stadium - Sat. May 31
Additional dates and venues to be announced.
Madonna's Sticky & Sweet tour will also visit Mexico and South America later this year. Show date and on sale information to follow. Israell (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of Speed Racer episodes. Fabrictramp (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
lack of reliable sources WP:RS,WP:N Dwanyewest (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per consensus Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable single as per the sentence in the article that says "the song failed to chart on any music chart". The preceding comment was added by User:Wolfer68. Nsk92 (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable. Bishops of splinter sects are not necessarily notable, and this one in particular fails Google Test, Google News Test. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indiscriminate list of terms. There is no source provided to indicate that the list is comprehensive or in fact representative of the AP US History test subject matter. Accordingly, the list is arbitrary.
I am loathe to list it here, since its prod expires tomorrow, but there is a similar article from the same original editor at AP Physics C Mechanics Help. —C.Fred (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, per (small) consensus, fails WP:CORP. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local business. Article is unreferenced, is written somewhat like an advertisement with external links only to promote the business, and otherwise has no assertion of notability. Hellno2 (talk) 23:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No claims to notability. The main Ubuntu itself is definitely notable, but is the toolkit to create the CDs notable separately? I don't believe so and no evidence has been supplied since the notability tag was put in. Canterbury Tail talk 23:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable church. In addition, the page which I reverted was designed to look like the church's personal website, and not like an encyclopedia article. Corvus cornixtalk 22:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I'm happy to userfy if someone wants the info for another article. - Philippe 01:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would say this topic is already adequately covered by other articles - the scope of this article is too broad. Plrk (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 01:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfixably badly written. Written entirely by one person, who probably has a conflict of interest. Foobaz·o< 22:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I fully undersatnd that the featish and latex genres are in and of themseves are not popular,yet there is alot of people into these genres (Including me) ,and beleive me,Miss Wayland is our first or ultimatly second most famous and recognizabble face in the genre,second only to Binca Beauchamp (In my opinion she is the first but I have to respect openion of other fetish and latex fans).
So If Miss Wayland is not popular amongst hardcore fans,It is extremely famous among Latex and Fetish Fans or what is called(The sweet Porn),and the evidence is the number of covers she made for the top Magazines in the genre like (Marquis , Massad , Skin Two , Pirates and many many more)
Thanx and I hope that you will change your mind,and this will be regarded as a respect for softcore fans. And a Last word to the guy who says that I have a conflict of inerest :I am a Fan to miss Wayland,I live in Iraq and she lives in germany,I never met her,never spooke to her,not connected to her in any way,not even participated to her paysite,I am Just A Fan,and If the article is entirely written by one person,theen it is not my fault,instead of spending time siting it for deletion,you can help by refining and increasing the article,I dont own the article according to WIKI roles,so you can be helpfull and make it better lol,wright????
--Loover (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Loover (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to say it but this might be a hoax. References have been requested since June 2006, I looked on Google books and scholar under multiple terms and found nothing. There's very little on a Google web search, noting appears relevent.[2] See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eau, apparently other articles created in the same batch as this one were suspected hoaxes too and deleted... this one wasn't for some reason. At any rate, happy hunting... I tried about 15 search terms and found nothing. If not sourced, should be deleted per WP:V. Rividian (talk) 22:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Since the creator wants it gone and noone disagrees... Spartaz Humbug! 21:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination: persistent repost by the subject of the article following speedy deletion. Possibly meets WP:PROF Skomorokh 22:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_Delaware_people —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjeandell (talk • contribs) 22:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jason Jeandell, "Improving Mental Maps: Sequencing Teacher Instruction Verbally and Visually", 2003 http://delcat.udel.edu/F/?find_code=WRD&request=Jason+Jeandell&func=find-b —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.230.115 (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Stubbornness: Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk to them about an editing issue, and repeatedly make changes opposed by everyone else. This is regrettable—you may wish to see our dispute resolution pages to get help. Repeated deletion or addition of material may violate the three-revert rule, but this is not "vandalism" and should not be dealt with as such. ...So from what I read, I can delete my own and it isn't vandalism!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VAND#NOT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-3rr (Jjeandell (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]
The result was Speedy Closed (non-admin closure). Vandalism removed, legitimate page, wrong place for this type of discussion. WilliamH (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsensical Mark5677 (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect as a reasonable solution, no outright reasons for deletion given. Leaving history intact per GFDL. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable musician, who was a member of band which briefly had minor success. The article is referenced only to his own MySpace page, and while a google news search throws up a few hits in the Irish music magazine Hot Press, I'm not sure that this adds up to notability per WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC.
I make the nomination because I think there is case for deletion, but I'll remain neutral for now. If kept, the article needs a major cleanup, because much of it appears to be original research or speculation. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So do you have any evidence that Ollie Cole is notability for activity independent of Turn (band)? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]Members of notable bands are not given individual articles unless they have demonstrated notability for activity independent of the band.
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not convinced this is a valid article- the does seem to be a potential discussion about facial hair and native Americans, but I don't feel that it deserves its own article, and especially not an article which is effectively a gallery of images of native Americans who happen to wear facial hair. Prod was removed by the author with the comment "Remove banner because I added sources." J Milburn (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. While there is a slight majority for deletion, the rationales are found somewhat lacking in the view of provided independent sources about the church which contribute to passing WP:N. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Individual church congregations are not notable unless proven otherwise, and this article has no proof of notability. It has sources, but not enough to make it notable. Nyttend (talk) 20:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per A7. bibliomaniac15 05:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable erotic wrestling club. Speedy was contested by one IP editor, and removed by another, but this is an advertisement for a non-notable business. Horologium (talk) 20:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable webzine fails WP:WEB. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 20:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 11:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't appear (searching on co.uk or com) to be a notable topic, a notable period in the school history of this region or a notable anything. Without sources, or proof that sources exist, this appears to be almost wholly OR or an essay. Creator appeared to have written only on the topic of his/her town TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 01:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many countries have scandals and controversial incidents but there is no such page (as far as I've known) titled with one specific ethnic group (it includes incidents held in the U.S and Japan) to collect scandals for decades. The title and article could mislead that South Korea is the only country to keep causing scandals in the world. Besides, the lead says the list is about political scandals in South Korea but the article includes too many irrelevant incidents to politics. Appletrees (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Irregardless of the timing of the nomination, the subject appears to be notable. . - Philippe 01:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No notability, apparently a vanity article. Previous discussion was erroneously closed when the closing magistrate felt that sources documenting the TV show Con provided notability. This logic is flawed in that the issue here is not whether wikipedia should have an article on Con, (and we do), its ONLY on whether this person (creator of the show) should have his own article even though he has accomplished little besides that show. Furthermore, it is ludicrous that the article on Stone is about 7 times as long as the article on "Con," which I think ran for all of two months. I say lets excise this unneeded article and make mention of Mr. Stone's 5 minutes of fame on the article about "Con," the only place where it belongs. JeanLatore (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Substantial recreation of prod, still mirrored at [8]. Since this was a prod, its ineligible for G4. That said, the article is borderline uneyclopedic, and fails WP:BIO. MrPrada (talk) 20:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to parent article. As it is, its a vanity article, nothing to merge that can't be said in one sentence of the parent article. Not merging content, but leaving history intact for mining and per GFDL Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly a vanity article about a non-notable person. If this article is to be included in Wikipedia, there are about 10 million more articles about people that should also be included. Starting small businesses is not notable unless the business becomes large or significant. Stellis (talk) 20:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 01:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails to establish why this radio personality is notable. Orphaned for nearly 1 year. Rtphokie (talk) 19:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete both. - Philippe 01:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. He is not mentioned by secondary sources. Steve Dufour (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ATTENTION!
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using ((subst:spa|username)) |
scamdetective1 (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2008
Repeat...delete: http://www.yalebooks.co.uk/yale/default.asp http://www.hup.harvard.edu/ http://academic.scranton.edu/organization/upress/forthcoming-releases.shtml http://academic.scranton.edu/organization/upress/current-releases.shtml http://www.oup.co.uk/search/ http://www.google.com/search?q=hamlin+house+press&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Each of these websites can be used to see if they ever even heard of Stephen Pastore. Furthermore, these fourteen books are SELF published. There's nothing wrong with that, but Mr. Pastore is not the world reknowned author he purports to be. Mr. Pastore is president of Cohort Books.http://scifi.fictionfactor.com/sfmg1.pdf (Sorry you'll have to do a short download of the listing on sci fi publishers; Cohort & Mr. Pastore are listed on page 40....but there's the truth of it. Furthermore, the info is public and you don't have to pay for it.) Ontoyou (talk) 03:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable single by questionably notable artist. I feel like a tourist (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 18:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRYSTAL, no proof that this album even exists yet. Only tracks are rumors, only source is MySpace. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article on a single released by a questionably notable artist. This song however does not meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. GtstrickyTalk or C 19:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List_of_Total_Nonstop_Action_Wrestling_tournaments#Deuces_Wild_Tournament - seems the logical solution. If redirects are undone, we can evaluate other options. - Philippe 01:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This tournament is included on the List of TNA tournaments article. It is not notable for it's own article. King iMatthew 2008 19:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A nonnotable internet art project tagged so since April. No independent references provided. Mukadderat (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable. I feel like a tourist (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, band with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BAND, no albums in general release, fails all criteria of WP:MUSIC, no Google hits. Ravenswing 19:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 01:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a TV show that does not yet exist. I feel like a tourist (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation. Hut 8.5 16:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. No salvagable encyclopaedic content. nancy (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alleged jinx that's really the author's opinion/analysis in violation of WP:NOR. No sources. Includes weasel words like "Many feel also..." NawlinWiki (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as notability has been confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OR essay on a non-notable field of one state's laws. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Did not speedily delete as a nonsense page. Looks like a not notable neologism to me. I found nothing on Google scholar or Google news. Google web search shows limited usage. My favorite is "I have a tendency to go off on people about how squarular should be a word until they get tired ." Then there is this bit of intellectual insight "Interestingly enough my honor students taught me the words squaricle and squarular (um, I think they're geometry terms...I don't teach math) today. (such is the state of education today.) Perhaps it's a new synonym for rectangle. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 18:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Dlohcierekim 18:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Fabrictramp (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy declined by DGG on the grounds that it asserts some notability. Personally I don't see it nor do I see RS coverage and ghits just confirm existence. Appears to fail WP:CORP TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 18:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, webcontent with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB and WP:CRYSTAL, online game from startup webgame company without any products to date, only now entering alpha testing. No independent sources, no pertinent Google hits. RGTraynor 18:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete; default to KEEP. - Philippe 01:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BLP1E; non-notable person known -- to the degree that she is -- for only this one incident. Zero citations on Google News for the last ten days; plainly, her fifteen minutes are up. Ravenswing 18:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted as advertising. - Philippe 01:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of RS coverage and ghits from .com or .co.uk give the same paltry results that are essentially download links. No evidence of notability but not sure whether assertion of a connection with notable artists pieces was a claim at notability to avoid a Speedy. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 18:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRYSTAL violation, movie not yet under production. ZERO Google hits, no sources proffered RGTraynor 17:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be a notable painter; only showcases were in his own gallery, and no third party sources could easily be found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of Bahavians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Bahavia is a fictional country. List is poor. Completely in-universe. The only two characters described in it are already in List of Cory in the House characters. Magioladitis (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - we wish you the best, but an article is inappropriate until notability has been established. - Philippe 01:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable musician, fails WP:MUSIC. Judging from the talk page, this is a PR piece and heavy WP:COI. Speedy and hangon tag removed by author. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay fair enough, I wasn't aware of the above. The #1 hits will follow ;)
We're just starting to push a couple of tracks on the airways so we thought it would be a good time to get some info up on Wiki before the album is released as Wiki seems to be the first place people look for information these days.
It should be more in depth by the end of this week.
Thanks for your help —Preceding unsigned comment added by NickHSpurs (talk • contribs) 18:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Fabrictramp (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For a number of reasons, I believe this article warrants deletion, along with a similar article that both refer to each other. Notability is the biggest factor. The company has not done much work, and doesn't meet the basic notability criteria: "if the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject." WHILE THE SERIES MAY BE NOTABLE the company itself is not, and if the paragraphs relating to the completed projects, which already refer to the SERIES PAGES were removed, what would be left would be a publicity article. As well, all the references to notability talk about the SERIES not the company. Until the company has produced more work, all information should be relegated to the SERIES PAGES rather than this company page. UnderPressure (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: I am also nominating the following related page because of Notability (the founder of this company has made a few student films and had some local recognition, a few minor awards, but does NOT meet the eligibility requirement for a creative professionals. As well the information is not all verifiable at this time:
The result was no consensus to delete; default to KEEP. - Philippe 01:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an amalgamation of original research. I'm not convinced any of the cited sources even use the phrase "traditionalist worldview". This topic is already covered under a number of other articles. The article doesn't have a strong form, structure or direction, and reads like a couple of book reviews patched together. Instead of using multiple sources to write about a topic, it reads like an argumentative essay, where sources are complied to reach an original conclusion (that all these different souces are actually talking about one thing which is termed a "traditionalist worldview"). However, that term itself gets a very low hit count on google (including google scholar and google book), which also brings up notability concerns. Perhaps the article should be rescoped under Social conservatism in the United States? But as it stands, the original research issues and notability concerns have me leaning towards delete (but hopefully making this article more visible through the AfD process could generate more ideas). Andrew c [talk] 16:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Policemen day everyday. Article fails notability per WP:BIO. Magioladitis (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Clearly non-notable, hoping to avoid COI since I am listed below. Rudget (Help?) 17:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable organization that fails WP:CORP. [18] is news coverage. Here are some ghits [19]. The latter simply reveals non-notable or unimportant mentions at various websites. I don't see any significant second or third party coverage. Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. Has a private psych practice, has been secretary of a state level org, but I don't see anything notable. (note: article was prodded, deprodded and replaced with material on a branch of psychology, I reverted to before I prodded it since the title did not fit the material that was added (and material already existed elsewhere). RJFJR (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, webcontent with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Beta stage, non notable music sharing community site, bordering on spam/advert. SGGH speak! 16:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does every Mousketeer need their own article? I'm not in the US, so don't know just how much of a cultural impact this show had — maybe this should be cleaned up and expanded instead. His IMDB entry shows him as having appeared in occasional episodes of other programmes, but (it appears) all in fairly minor roles. If kept, this one will have to be slash-and-burn rewritten from the ground up (in this case, aside from adding in the other roles, I don't propose to do this myself as I've no knowledge of the subject). — iridescent 15:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per G11. bibliomaniac15 05:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete; default to KEEP. - Philippe 01:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:FICT, WP:PLOT, WP:N. Unnotable race of monsters in Kamen Rider Blade with no significant coverage in any reliable, third party sources. All sources added after AfD are from the official series website, and do not establish any notability. Nothing but plot and a big list of the 52 "monsters-of-the-day" seen in the 49 episode series. Already well covered by a single paragraph in the main article. Tagging for notability since March 2008. AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 01:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD: non-notable card game. A quick Google search turns up only trivial mentions and catalog entries. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable. "Presumed" means if there is substantive coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, then we presume the topic is notable. However, a subject that is presumed to be notable may still not be suitable for inclusion. For example, it may violate what Wikipedia is not.... Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article.
Of the refernces presented and those that I have been able to find for this game, there's only one that satisfies the first paragraph in this criteria: the scifi.com review. I'm not exactly sure what Mathman means in saying multiple non-trivial sources are not the main issue. Verifibility is one thing, I'm not arguing that this game doesn't actually exist, and that doesn't nessacarially require sources described in WP:NOTE to prove. My issue here is notability, unless someone found print sources that aren't being listed, I don't see how notability is established enough for this game to stand on its own as an article. Merging is a definate possibility. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions)
The result was no consensus. - Philippe 01:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Family-run business that does not assert notability. Of the three references provided one is the company website, one only mentions the company in passing and the third doesn't mention it at all. Creator has WP:COI issues, sharing a similar username to the surname of the family who run the business. Roleplayer (talk) 13:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge. Thanks for completing it. I'm not completely sold that the organization's name should redirect to the bio, but instead should be the other way around. I won't change it now, but if there's interest, it can be discussed. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not asserted and googling shows little indication of any notability. Mangoe (talk) 12:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page because the subject seems only "notable" as the originator of the above:
Mangoe (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 02:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess this might be a convenient place for editors to copy letters to paste elsewhere, but it's not all consonants, as it claims; it includes some non-IPA consonants and consonants not found in normal speech, without distinguishing them; and it's full of non-notable details without any context. Besides it being misleading, what's the point? kwami (talk) 19:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This table provides useful information. I don't think it should be deleted unless this information is already provided elsewhere in wikipedia. Perhaps it could be merged. The article could be edited to meet the concerns mentioned (e.g. marking non-IPA consonents). Karl (talk) 08:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Response: This is an incomplete and poorly maintained duplicate of information at IPA. The only addition is that, through OR, a few of the diacritics have been combined with some of the letters they can combine with, and laid out explicitly; this gives the impression that these combinations are somehow notable, when in fact some of them may never occur at all, and literally hundreds of consonants which do occur are neglected. It would be unwieldy to list every attested or possible combination of diacritic and letter, which is why it is not done at "IPA", and if we avoid OR and list just the individual letters, then there would be no difference from the IPA charts at all. I think that the fact that some of you find it "impressive" is itself reason for deletion: The table conveys an aura of authority that it does not deserve. If we were to merge it with "IPA", there would be no change that I can see to that article, so it would be the same as deletion. kwami (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We should probably consider this together with Table of vowels. That has sound files & such, so might be worth moving to Wikipedia space or something, but it isn't an article. kwami (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I need to mark it as OR, then. kwami (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If we keep, which consonants should we include? What are our criteria? kwami (talk) 23:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy userfy to User:Gopherfan/downward mobility and divorce. Part of a bit of freeloading by this author, Wojci028 and Spygirl86. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated because till now no substantial content has been put up. Shovon (talk) 11:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep: It is fairly weak right now but I will be adding more stuff until about noon today. It is an assignment for a class I am taking and my prof wanted us to make a wiki article out of it. So it will be up and sourced within the day. I am a newbie at this so after I finish if there is any tweaking you want to do, then go for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.153.158 (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by another admin. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not show any notability what so ever. Original article was just a list of family members Triwbe (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Combination of advertising, and WP:NOR violation Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 10:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick McKeown is a representative of the founding Buteyko Clinic of Moscow and is accredited by the Late Professor Buteyko. Very few people in the western world have this accreditation: see: http://www.buteykoclinic.com/
Close Your Mouth is a self published work but popular. See rankings on amazon.co.uk as of 12th may 2008; http://www.amazon.co.uk/Close-Your-Mouth-Buteyko-Breathing/dp/0954599616/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210580973&sr=8-2
His work in Ireland hase received extensive media coverage and his clinics have expanded to many countries throughout the world: See http://www.asthmacare.ie/
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod, notability issues. Procedural AfD nomination, no opinion from my side. Thank you for your attention. Tone 09:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Nominator clearly doesn't understand deletion policy; any errors in the article can easily be fixed without deletion coming into play. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am writing a report on why the article on Supercompact space should be deleted. First of all, this article states 8 facts, with some 100 references or so. Just delete the article. If this article is so important, then why don't you prove it by giving names of people who actually research this topic. No one does. Also, see the following five small reasons:
. Paracompactness and compactness ARE IMPORTANT topics and that is why no one has challenged them. However, supercompactness is not nearly as important and shouldn't be on an encyclopaedia such as this one.
. This page has hardly anything. It has just stated facts. There are only a few points written on this page. It is a useless stub.
. There is no point in using a WHOLE page to talk abou supercompactness. This article should be written under Alexander's Subbase Theorem. It has hardly any information.
. There is someone who keeps removing this sign for speedy deletion and gives no reasons why he does this. Could an administrator please see that he stops?
Is supercompactness worthy of study? Was it a concept, so important that mathematicians were dumbstruck by it as soon as it was defined? The "Nagata-Smirnov Theorem" article is a good example of an article which shouldn't be deleted since it is extremely important. Is supercompactness even as important as the definition of a point (such as a point in R^2)? I may seem to be exaggerating but I am strong on my word. I understand that some people (such as "Oded"), have not been against me just for the sake of it. Others have said that this article shouldn't be deleted and given no reason to back this up. I am going to report this article to an administrator. Some articles that are extremely important have no references given to them (there are heaps of such articles in mathematics). Why do people waste their time give 800 references to such a negligible article? Please answer this.
In conclusion, this article is useless, and ineffective. It provides no applications in other elements of point-set topology and has only a few facts. This article is like wasting one whole piece of paper just for writing a single word. Someone should delete it. If not, I will. Topology Expert (talk) 09:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete both. - Philippe 02:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Club has never played above level 11 of the English league system, which is not generally deemed notable. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. For the same reason I am also nominating Taverners F.C. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A high school cadet unit that is not notable enough for its own page. Relevant material is largely covered in Barker College. Most content unsourced. Recurring dreams (talk) 09:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article makes an unsubstantiated, unsourced assertion that is either a severe misunderstanding or vandalism. Eurish is one fellows *idea* of a language for a "New Holy Roman Empire" but I am not aware (nor is Google, for that matter) of any such historically attested language or dialect. Szfski (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Database CSA Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts Title Europe's Linguistic Future: The Eurish-Problem Author Decsy, Gyula Affiliation EUROLINGUA, PO Box 101 Bloomington IN 47402-0101 Source Eurasian Studies Yearbook, 1993, 65, 7-18 ISSN 0042-0786
Frank | talk 17:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was as the article has been moved to the Foundation, no action taken at this time.. - Philippe 02:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. A clear example of Wikipedia is not a memorial. Fram (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Chaffchaff (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Excuse me but yesterday (nearly 2 yrs after his death) there were 2 radio broadcasts (IBA News 12:00 and Channel 7 16:00) and one television interview (Channel 10 07:00) about Benji and his posthumous contribution through the foundation created in his memory. As this is a one of a kind Foundation it is both notable and of interest to Israelis and Jews around the world alike. Basically the idea to have a page for Major Hillman is to show the positive , important impact his death created.--Chaffchaff (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A biography of a Canadian football player playing in a not notable local league (the Illawarra Premier League) in Australia who does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia per WP:Athlete. A speedy was removed by an IP who said (on the talk page), "this article is signifcant because this person is significant to his hometown". Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. - Philippe 02:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent hoax - a third chamber of the UK Parliament that was wiped out following a massacre in 1505? I think not. No refs, needless to say, and a quick look on Google and in my Oxford History of Britain fails to reveal anything. BencherliteTalk 07:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per author request under WP:CSD#G7 and the current consensus here. For what it's worth, I agree that calling it a "weak" law school was unnecessary.--Kubigula (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. He is just an adjunct professor at a weak law school and a minor sports agent Blahblah5555 (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He may not be as important as your Mormon polygamist, but he is fairly renowned in the world of sports and has links on Wikipedia. Hotcop2 (talk) 11:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy was declined on this one, for the usual categorical reasons, so here we go. This violates WP:CRYSTAL and there's no notability whatsoever asserted. Line up for the piñata. Qworty (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Close as delete. Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. AfD listed after I deleted the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be some sort of team. If it is relevant to Wikipedia (which it isnt) it should only be in Wikipediaspace. Since it is not relevant to wikipedia, this sort of thing has to be done off of site. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a webhost, and as thus not a thinktank in articlespace. asenine say what? 06:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 02:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't look like an encyclopedia topic. delete UtherSRG (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn.. Discussion revealed that subject is notable as an Olympic athlete, merge discussions can occur on the appropriate talk pages. Nonadmin close. Xymmax (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Probably a very nice man but not notable. Just as a large company's 5th head marketing director of the eastern region would probably not qualify for a wikipedia article, so shouldn't a 5th coach of a school qualify. Did he also coach an olympic team? no. JerryVanF (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete JerryVanF (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC) I remembered that I have to inform the author of the AFD. Now that I have done it, it feels like I just punched the guy in the stomach. So I will hold off AFD's for now. As far as this one, I abstain. He may be very notable, who knows! JerryVanF (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep and Merge: Wikipedia:WikiProject College football consideres all head college football coaches (past and present) notable. See arguments listed under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gottsch. HOWEVER, this notification let me to realize that someone has created an article about Fay Moulton the olympic athelete from Kansas. I think that it just about has to be the same person and we should look in to merging the two articles--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Based on the above comment and the fact that the nominator struck through his !vote, I'm going to treat this as a withdrawn nomination and close. Xymmax (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There was a contested prod for this article (the prod had been placed by User:DGG as "non-notable chess player and self-styled genius"). Lots of claims to notability in the text of the article but on closer inspection it does not seem to me that they hold up. 1)The high IQ societies stuff: the societies mentioned themselves are not notable. 2) Guinness records (longest checkmate in a blindfold match or something like that). Possibly notable, I am not sure. Does not seem to have received substantial mention or coverage anywhere else except for a mention in the Correspondense Chess News article mentioned in this WP entry. Still, could be the strongest claim to notability but I am not sure what to make of it. Guinness has a lot of weird and not notable stuff like people with the longest nose or whatever. 3) Possibly a notable chess player. Again, based on the sources presented, it does not quite look like that to me. The same Correspondense Chess News article mentions that his FIDE ranking is quite low, at 2164. He does not seem to hold a Grandmaster rank or even an International Master or a FIDE Master (at least I have not seen it mentioned anywhere). 4) There are a few more things in the entry like inventing some new IQ test and some kind of new university exam tests but these claims are thin on references and do not appear to be notable. GoogleNews (all dates) gives 2 hits[30]. A little bit of everything in this article but it is not clear if any of it adds up to notability per WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 04:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, group with no assertion of notability (and apparently only one member); also fails WP:NFT -- "This belief was Created by Benjamin Wilbur, a Cheyenne high school student from North Las Vegas, in 2007." NawlinWiki (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clear, self-purported case of something made up in school one day. Unspeediable as vandalism. FrankTobia (talk) 04:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), because its WP:DAB value is confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)"[reply]
Neither of these works has a page. No need for a dab. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable local sports league. Claims to have been recognized by notable sources, but no citations are given, despite the article having been prodded for that reason for a day (author removed the prod tag without providing citations for the claimed reliable sources). NawlinWiki (talk) 04:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, group with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I originally speedied it as nonsense but it was then given some context. Sounds like a religion I'd enjoy seeing as I'm quite enamored with chicken wings, but WP is definitely not for religions, however fun, that are made up one day especially since this one is the wrong type of food ;) TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is am amazing web page and its a true religion. I have experienced it myself and follow it as faithfully as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.7.245.88 (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete; default to KEEP. - Philippe 02:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a trivial list of indiscriminate data, and I'm at a loss as to why we're hosting it. (jarbarf) (talk) 04:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 14:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Listed with maintenance tags for references and notability, prodded by me on the grounds that no attention paid to the notability tag, prod and maintenance tags removed by unregistered editor without any improvement. Only edit by article's starter, so probably fails WP:COI Richhoncho (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn, and guess who needs to brush up on WP:MOSDAB? Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dab page with only two entries. Situation can be remedied with hatnotes, no need for a dab. (For the record, one of the news broadcasters at my local radio station is named Bruce Johnson, but he's not notable enough to be included here.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily Closed (non-admin closure). Content merging can be dealt with at the article's talk page and is not grounds for a deletion discussion, per WP:ATD, "this should be solved through regular editing". WilliamH (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article about an Intermediate school that does not assert its notability. Per this AFD on another intermediate school in the same district, I propose a merge of useful information into Klein Independent School District and then deletion of the article. -MBK004 04:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Klein Independent School District as stated in the nom, so why are we at AfD? TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This one makes a couple of extremely weak stabs at notability, both of them falling far from the mark. He once managed a local political campaign, but has never held office himself or done anything else of political note, thus failing WP:POLITICIAN. He's published a mystery novel under a pseudonym, but he had to pay notorious vanity press AuthorHouse to get into print, and his book fails WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Original research/neologism. Tagged for notability since January. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, though if someone wishes to transwiki I can give them the information. Wizardman 14:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef, no way that it can be turned into more than that. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, withdrawn by nominator. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 14:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Originally tagged as a copyvio, infringing material removed. That being said, this is about a non-notable brand of tea/ coffee substitute. Google turns up mostly advertising, nothing independent, and apparently this was speedied a little over amonth ago as spam. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Works for a company that's so non-notable that it's been deleted twice: [31]. Non-notable businessman fails WP:BIO. He was a finalist for an award once, and he shelled out some money to pay notorious vanity press AuthorHouse to print up some copies of his book, a tome which roundly fails WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline advertising for a non-notable church -- no sources seem to exist for this place. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), because notability is confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable former executive of a small company that no longer exists. Not much more to say about this one. Qworty (talk) 03:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Three assertions of notability are made, and the article fails on all three counts. His notability is asserted as a politician, but he has never held office, having failed twice to be elected to Congress; he therefore fails WP:POLITICIAN. His notability is asserted as an author, but all he's ever done in the world of letters is pay notorious vanity-press AuthorHouse for publication (which is something anyone with a checkbook can do), thus failing WP:BK. His notability is asserted as a radio personality, but he was at a small local station that doesn't place him over the WP:BIO bar. His greatest claim to fame is that Hillary Clinton's brother once trounced him in a primary, but bear in mind WP:NOTINHERITED. I just don't see notability in the cards for this one. Qworty (talk) 02:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete `'Míkka>t 06:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable or newly coined neologism; google only pulls up nineteen results, and few of those are relevant. There are virtually no reliable secondary sources for this term, therefore I believe it should be deleted. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 02:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep GBooks and Scholar hits show its in use. I don't think OR is needed to put together an article on the term's historical use. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 04:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a nonnotable comic, that's hasn't got a single source. Graevemoore (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only roles on IMDb are bit parts. No reliable sources to be seen. Insiufficient context. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable song; didn't chart, was only performed at a concert once it seems. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 02:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very little context, I can't figure out where this water wheel and tramway even are. A search for the title turns up nothing outside Wikipedia. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BLP1E here. Only notable for one thing it seems. Tagged for cleanup since 09/2007 with no improvements. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Denison, Texas. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable high school stadium with few Google results and none that I noticed that were in any way promising enough to satisfy the notability criteria with reliable sources. I attempted to redirect to the high school, but I was rebuffed by the article creator and therefore submit this here as the alternative. Erechtheus (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per snow. First delete vote calls for more work, and keep if notability is established (it has). Second delete is for speedy (doesn't apply). Third delete has withdrawn their opinion. Whats left is sufficient cause to keep. Great work on improvements. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 21:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable journey between two points in Ireland. Deleted via prod, apparently restored after (slightly confusing) "late" contest. Deiz talk 01:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete by Anthony.bradbury (A1 - insufficient context or too short to understand article) . Nonadmin close Xymmax (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable character from a hardly-notable book. (Don't get me wrong, though. I love Frank's work.) Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 01:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Philippe 02:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fund raiser for Ron Paul who built a blimp and apparently fails to meet WP:MUSIC for his music career. Article is a WP:COATRACK for Ron Paul's presidential run. Relavent information is already in the Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008 article, and at best, this is a case of WP:BLP1E. Burzmali (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Warhammer 40,000. - Philippe 02:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just a summary of how a fictional ship has appeared in a fictional universe, i.e. plot summary. Not permissible under WP:PLOT.
Note that this has been unreferenced for about six months, so this nomination should hardly come as a surprise. Graevemoore (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted - blatant attack page. — iridescent 22:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notable? You decide. Adoniscik(t, c) 00:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete in view of the article lacking any context as pointed out by B.Wind. If someone wants to place a redirect here, go ahead, but if a full article is desired, a redlink might be more effective at encouraging a rewrite. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreferenced oneliner about a school with no indication that this school is a high school and therefore by default notable, or otherwise Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete by Neil (G12 - copyright violation). Nonadmin close. Xymmax (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable winery. Google comes up with quite a few results, but none of them seem to be independent and non-trivial. Most appear to be advertising and press releases. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article was deleted, yet this process hasn't completed. As the only one who voted Keep so far, I'm not gonna bother taking it upon myself to get it overturned, but it should be restored until the AfD process is complete. --MQDuck 11:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since a few months this person has held an office in a high school student organization of unknown size which was founded two and a half years ago - I am not convinced that this entails encyclopedic notability. In any case, the article in its current form fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources (no independent sources whatsoever). High on a tree (talk) 00:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
74.70.144.72 (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfy per request; otherwise, DELETE. - Philippe 02:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested Prod. Essay about music management. Sourced, but largely an opinion piece. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 00:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW -Djsasso (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This magazine is obviously notable, but it would be impossible to maintain a list of contributors. This is a monthly magazine that has been around for 26 years, and the example cover has 17 different authors. So that's a list of ~5304 authors (if there were no repeats). This is just an impossible and unmanageable list to maintain. Mangostar (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Philippe 02:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Bonds 714th home run Misterdiscreet (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]