The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No coverage by reliable sources to establish notability. Kelly hi! 23:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable person who writes a column for his job - no decent independent coverage of his life - if his column (or anything else about him is notable) Ask the Pilot - currently it is a redirect to the BLP - no objection to a redirect to that.Off2riorob (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'Neuropa' is a compound word, from Neu + Europa, which has been used several times for various meanings: it was a word used by W.E.B. Dubois to describe Nazi plans for Europe, and it has also been the name of several bands and record labels. None of these uses seem particularly notable. This article focuses on the Nazi use, but as it notes, the Nazis never used the word themselves and it 'did not come into general use in English'. As such, I can't find many sources using or discussing it. This article, then, is basically about a single article by W.E.B. DuBois. I just don't think it's notable enough to justify an article. Robofish (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Georgian Bay, Ontario. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable small town library. Orange Mike | Talk 23:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism; semi-advert for the author's name. Orange Mike | Talk 23:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of Spider-Man (1994 TV series) episodes. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 18:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - over the last couple of weeks I've been working through Category:Marvel animated universe trying to clarify and consolidate its contents. I am suggesting that all of these episode articles be deleted. First and foremost, they all fail the general notability guideline which requires significant coverage in reliable sources. Many of the articles have no sources. Those that do rely on unreliable sources like fansites, blogs and IMDB and sites that may or may not have some affiliation with Marvel, none of which can be used to establish notability. Note that passing mentions in sources, which do exist, may establish the existence of these episodes but passing mentions do not establish notability and existence is not notability. Second, the articles for the most part consist of long and overly detailed plot summaries, in violation of WP:PLOT and WP:WAF, which require that articles on works of fiction be more than plot descriptions and that articles about fiction should show how the fiction is significant in the real world. Many of the articles have been tagged with various concerns for well over a year, including calls for improved referencing, indicators of real-world significance, comportment with Wikipedia style and general notability concerns. Since no independent reliable sources exist, these articles cannot be improved to bring them into compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harley Hudson (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No ranking, no titles, and nothing to indicate she meets WP:NSPORTS other than an early round exit at the Commonwealth Games, which, IMO, isn't sufficient. Maybe someday, but not today. Courcelles 21:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Neutralitytalk 05:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MOVIE. Singularity42 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable engineer. Not to be confused with the politician of the same name, who is notable. No third party sources. Briefly an MIT professor, but no real claim to notability beyond the usual acheivements that you would expect from anyone in academia. Prod declined, in part because his family is notable, which I don't consider a basis for individual notability. Hairhorn (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Berg was added to Eureka, California as a notable person by an IP editor who said he was a fighter, loan shark & bouncer. I cannot find a notable Tony Berg in Eureka, California who is a fighter, loan shark or bouncer. Following the link to the Tony Berg page that the anonymous editor linked to his/her edit, I found nothing of notability and was unable to verify the information on the page. Since this is an entry on a living person for whom I cannot find local or regional notability, I marked the page for deleting following the 3 step instructions on WP:AFD.Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I created this article as the IP address; I cannot speedy delete this article, so I can avoid creator and IP controversies. The article appeared to established the film's notability; however I think, not enough people have become aware of the film anymore. I don't mean to offend the film's targeted audience. In fact, I have been embarassed by my own article that hasn't improved for years. Feel free to comment if you wish. Gh87 (talk) 04:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly, this article has two sources and not enough citations to provide it. JJ98 (Talk) 20:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see no notability, fails WP:GNG CTJF83 20:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not established in accordance with WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Lack of significant, reliable, and independent sources. Subject lacks significant roles in television and films. Cind.amuse 08:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find appropriate coverage of this singer to satisfy wp's notability requirements for this 1-sentence article. The article has been tagged for notability since 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 01:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily redirected to combat boot. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No notability established. PROD was removed without explanation or improvement. Sitush (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by creator without providing any reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Sabily. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 18:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable product, no substantial reviews on quick Google check, nothing in G News. TransporterMan (TALK) 18:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/_media/news/oj3-final.jpg?cache=
http://www.ojuba.org/wiki/_media/linux/xfce4-notif.png?cache=
It could be ported to other Linux distributions as with Monajat (software).
--Christopher Forster (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC) and --Christopher Forster (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like an ad for the consulting company Maneesh (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was closing as moot, article was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth as lacking minimal significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious notability and promotional tone. Orange Mike | Talk 17:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:AUTHOR. I have tried to locate reliable sources regarding the books and have found no substantial coverage. The name appears to be shared by other people, so it makes it a bit difficult to be sure that none of the sources are regarding this Kate Axelrod. I also tried a search for the Mother Jones award, which is mentioned in the article, but can not locate a citation for that. Regarding the Donegal Fellow, there is also nothing I can turn up. If proper reliable sources are turned up by others with better Google Kungfu, then I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by Anthony Bradbury (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content: ). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD. Serpent's Choice (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No sources and no notability. Saddhiyama (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Digimon Xros Wars characters. Content is still available below the redirect in case someone wishes to merge. Stifle (talk) 09:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No out-of-universe notability, no sources whatsoever. Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (films). Crusio (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Fails WP:V. There's no real evidence that this university exists, possible hoax. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article gives no sources. I can find no confirmation of anything about this, not even its existence. A Google search for "Okwa University" produces six hits, of which two are Wikipedia, three are pages in which the word "Okwa" just happens to be followed by "University" (e.g. "Anthony Okwa, University of Jos"), and one is a list of educational institutions in Nigeria, in which "Gideon Okwa University" is listed. Not one of the hits refers to an Okwa University in the Sudan. The article did attempt to give a reference to http://www.okwau.com (now removed) but that page simply says "OKWA U DOT COM: COMING SOON" and nothing more. The article may well be a hoax, and if it isn't then it refers to something which has absolutely no notability at all. The article tells us that the University is not yet built or opened: time for an article when it exists. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep by criterion 1: nomination withdrawn without dissenting comments. Non-admin closure. Serpent's Choice (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to meet WP:BAND, non-notable band. TransporterMan (TALK) 14:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator — I've confirmed that the band has been in rotation at Triple J, thus satisfying WP:BAND#11. I would nonetheless like to note that there are a considerable number of different reasons not to consider the Triple J Unearthed competitions to be "major music competitions" for purposes of WP:BAND, primary among them being that Triple J Unearthed has run somewhere around 22 competitions since 2006 with as many as 5-6 winners in each competition. — TransporterMan (TALK) 15:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed my own prod when the earlier AfD came up (not sure how I missed it). Role in Lemonade Mouth is new since then. Prior AfD came up with four brief/insubstantial references in reliable sources. Current article completely lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources and I am unable to find any. Not notable. SummerPhD (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete it! He is at least an actor! rtucker913 (talk) 08:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Long time unreferenced biography of a living person with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources able to be found. The-Pope (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No success finding reliable sources, either. --joe deckertalk to me 06:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Mentioned in Italian Wikipedia (redlink - no references). No sources found. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No apparent notability to WP:NSPORT. Typically chess players are Grandmasters to be considered professional. Alexi is one level lower as an International master and no other obvious claim to fame notability. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The only assertion of notability is the claim of a Grammy-nominated recording. However, as I mentioned on the talk page more than a month ago, I can find no evidence that his recording was in fact nominated for a Grammy. A month ago it was not mentioned on his personal website nor his EMU faculty biography, and though it's since been added to each of those, I can find no independent mention of this. The relevant Grammy category is either "Best Instrumental Soloist(s) Performance (With Orchestra)" or "Best Instrumental Soloist Performance (Without Orchestra)", and outside the Wikipedia article, mirror sites, and sites related to him, there is nothing to support the statement that the recording was nominated. cmadler (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Robert Anton Wilson. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 18:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable, fictional "political party." It does not seem to exist outside of Robert Anton Wilson. While Wilson is notable, the "Guns and Dope Party" is not, per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:ORGIN. OCNative (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to The Giver#Adaptations and delete history per consensus. When this begins production the history can be restored. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article is speculative, bordering on CRYSTAL. While one of the sources used seems to confirm the existence of plans for the movie, that doesn't establish notability. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 12:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Basically a glorified webmaster. Nothing notable about him. Jonny2x4 (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable author who has only published a couple of minor books. Basically a glorified webmaster. Jonny2x4 (talk) 08:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Article is a blank page with one small phot - no other content. Tagged for speedy deletion CSD#A3. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About the user. Title in Hindi. SuryaPrakash.S.A. Talk... 08:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 18:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: A version of this article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Livechat. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Live Chat is one of category names. There are many live chat softwares provided by other companies under the "Live Chat" category. So I think Live Chat shoud be an article telling visits following things: what is live chat, features of live chat, functions of live chat and so on. It is not reasonable to create a "livechat" article for only one live chat software product. Ellen here (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's a substantial difference between 'LiveChat' service and general category of live chat software. Agree that 'Live Chat' (written separately as 2 words) is one of generic descriptions for chat software. At this moment Wikipedia presents that correctly: live chat, live help and live person all link to live support software page, where a general description of the software for maintaining online relations with website visitors is listed. 'LiveChat' is a page describing the popular brand. 'LiveChat' is also protected by the USPTO trademark (registration no: 3068899; no claim is made to 'Live Chat' written separately). Klim3k 09:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted by User:Hadal. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 02:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Says 1999 in the infobox, but looks like a forthcoming album (to be released in 2012?). Seems like unsourced WP:CRYSTAL - can see no obvious reliable sources, and can't find where the "Confirmed Tracks" comes from -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prospect included in a notable trade who hasn't become a notable figure on his own. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not appear to meet music criteria. Djc wi (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prod was removed. Concern: Notability not established and no reliable sources (only source is a web forum) Eeekster (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see any evidence that this housing development has any form of notability. At 521 "estimated" inhabitants it is not particularly large. Daniel 02:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2006. Neutralitytalk 04:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It makes little to no sense for a separate article for this election article to exist when: a) It is in need of serious edits to fix many mistakes. b) It is redundant: All of this information, in fewer words, can be found at the page for "United States House of Representatives elections in New Hampshire, 2006." This page offers nothing new to the event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tqycolumbia (talk • contribs)
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly referenced (and possible WP:COI) bio of a person notable primarily as a municipal councillor in a town of less than 5,000 people; claims of notability as a musician are entirely unreferenced and purely promotional in tone. In the absence of properly sourced evidence that actually he meets either WP:POLITICIAN or WP:NMUSIC, delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tara Lieden 22:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again for the help and please consider to KEEP this article...i did a lot of work on it! :) Tara Lieden 04:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BABYGRAND007 (talk • contribs)
Danny Geston 23:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by OVIETHEGREAT8 (talk • contribs)
Tara Lieden 02:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Tara Lieden 03:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
as per WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. as unique as this person is all it got was a spike of 6 gnews hits in 2005 [35]. LibStar (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews [36]. google only reveals mirrors and directory listings. interestingly a source is "rider's digest" [sic]. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this page for an absence of the notability of this Kelly Chen's album. Also, no sources. I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons as mentioned before:
Gh87 (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability - Might be notable in Krakow, but not very notable on the Internet - no English language sources. Few if any independent references with wider recognition. It's a guy with a travel website - article written with a blatant advertising bent.
I am also nominating the following related pages because it is a redirect with diacritical marks removed:
Ajh1492 (talk) 00:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Centre. One source with an in-passing mention does not appear to be enough to establish notability. No hits on Google News. Quite a lot of Ghits, but nothing that seems to be substantial. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 01:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:CORP. nothing in gnews. 3 of the sources are mere blogs and are not reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find sufficient RS coverage of this person reflecting notability. The article has been tagged for notability since 2009. It is a BLP with zero references and zero external links.Epeefleche (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find sufficient RS coverage of this singer, whose article has been tagged for notability since 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 01:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While this singer exists, I can't find significant indicia of notability either in her RS coverage, or otherwise. Tagged for notability since 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 02:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. –MuZemike 19:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable author. Ridernyc (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. All of the content was a copyright violation, which left literally nothing left in the article. That being said, I have no objection to a copyvio-free recreation of the article, as the one keep rationale suggested some notability there. –MuZemike 19:43, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article states no notability or importance, and I was only able to find one critical review via Google (although this may be somewhat complicated due to the fact that there is an unrelated movie of the same name). It is therefore my belief that the article fails Wp:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article on a band was PRODed under A7. It was de-prodded. I could not find sufficient evidence of notability of this band under wp’s notability rules. Others are welcome to try. Epeefleche (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails notability criteria for albums. Bootlegs are generally non-notable and no source contradicts this. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Claims to be the largest Chinese film festival in Europe but provides no evidence to that effect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NOTDIR, we don't have indiscriminate listings of entities. This list essentially covers anyone ("historical personages") apart from "athletes, criminals, entertainers, monarchs or US. Presidents". Most notable people have a nickname of some sort, and I fail to see why we need a list of the nicknames of "famous people" which is almost entirely open-ended. Anthem of joy (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. –MuZemike 19:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find RSs to indicate this author meets WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO/WP:GNG. Of the three sources currently listed, one is the author's own site and another appears to be the author's self profile on an author website. The third, though listing the author among the ten most interesting Catholics in 2010, is a blurb in a blog and not the sort of RS needed to establish notability, especially as the only unaffiliated source. Novaseminary (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This 1-sentence-of-text band article was PRODed under A7, as failing to reflect notability (it simply says the band exists). The PROD was removed, without any rationale at all being offered. It appears to lack notability under wp standards. Epeefleche (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This 1-sentence-of-text band article was PRODed under A7, as failing to reflect notability (it simply says the band exists). The PROD was removed, without any rationale at all being offered. It appears to lack notability under wp standards. Epeefleche (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article cites no references, and a Google search of the phrase turned up no results that discuss the book, other than Wikipedia pages in other languages, that say the same thing as this page. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. I'm not feeling like trying to figure out to a mathematical certainty whether this should be filed under "no consensus" or "keep". Either way, it's not going away. T. Canens (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find any sources which aren't directly or indirectly fueled by company's strong PR campaign. Non-notable. TransporterMan (TALK) 20:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]