![]() |
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. There is a 60-page self-published book on it, which is not available. None of the standard chess opening books list it. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 16:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFILMS, director, producer, and actors are all non-notable, barely any coverage, low-grossing Revolution1221 (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Concern was Fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played in a competitive, first-team match for a fully professional club and also fails WP:GNG due to a sheer lack of reliable, third-party sources. PROD was contested on the grounds that he had played in fully professional matches. This is false. He has never played above the fourth level of the Swedish football pyramid, with the first level being the only one that is fully pro. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"/* Atilla Engin Köksal */ In sweden, Division 2 and above are considered as proffessionall (SEMI-PRO). and all div 2 players and above have wikipedia sites right now." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swedenfootballtalents (talk • contribs) 08:26, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable production company. The most frequently cited reference relates to company's own website - half of the other citations are not linked to reliable sources and don't even mention the company in the article cited. The text was originally created on 11 July 2012 and hijacked the Make It Happen disambiguation page before someone moved it to its own article - as the only other contribution from the creator is text for Make It Happen's founder Billy Frank (which likewise has hijacked an existing article about the cricketer Billy Frank), I strongly suspect that Mr Frank wrote both pieces as a promotional puff for his company. Richard3120 (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Search for any reliable sources was successfully rebutted. Secret account 04:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company with only a few stores. Article itself is written in a way that fools the reader into thinking it's notable. But all the information in derived from the company's site, which is boasting all this information about itself. Dew Kane (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Ceres F.C.. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PROD contested but essentially this is a social football club which has not played at a national level or received significant coverage in order to demonstrate notability. Indications that the team may be joining a league in the future are WP:Crystal, the references provided do not explicitly deal with the article in question, rather they confirm the existence of secondary subjects such as other teams, stadia, etc. Most importantly, even if the references indicate notability, they appear to support the Ceres F.C. article and not this one, as the other's squad lists players such as Byeong Jeong Yoon from references provided here. C679 20:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. J04n(talk page) 16:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is based on one book with the same title. No evidence provided that this is a real sub-discipline within Philosophy. No evidence of notability after several years of tagging ----Snowded TALK 11:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No discernible inclusion criteria. This appears to be an eccectrically selected list of porn performers (quite a few nn), translated from a list on de-wiki with different notability criteria, sourcing requirements, and BLP standards. Laced with claims lacking reliable sources and, even worse, BLP violations like unreferenced "real names". An incoherent, useless mess. Just what "international" means here is incomprehensible. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Tattoo. J04n(talk page) 10:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is little more than an incomplete list of styles of tattooing; the whole thing might be better merged into Tattoo, perhaps just as a "see also". --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 10:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable author lacking GHITS and GNEWS of substance. His latest work has gained some media attention, but it is hardly a significant work. Fails WP:AUTHOR. reddogsix (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously I think it shouldn't be deleted because I created it. Whether the work is significant or not is up for debate, but I feel it is, especially where I'm from (Croatia). I'm having trouble finding his interviews and such he's done over here, but that's more a problem with this country than the author. Anyway, you guys know more about the rules than I do (they are pretty difficult to understand by the way). I've created a couple more pages today, one of them for notable artist Stacey Rozich, but that one has problems too. A page which meets all the criteria will be created for him at some point, I just thought I'd be helpful by doing it. Maybe I'll just give up with this. Francesca Barrel eye (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, well we'll see. Didn't realise it was so difficult to get things on here! It makes sense though, otherwise there'd be all sorts of ridiculous pages. Francesca :) Barrel eye (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND.
Band doesn't seem to be signed to any notable label which would infer notability if they had released more than one album on that label.
A Google News search provides no articles about the subject. A Google News Archive search also produces no articles that would constitute independent and significant coverage from a reliable source. The band's name makes it difficult to search for sources, though.
Lastly, the article has two references. One is significant coverage from an independent and reliable sources but the source is a local online newspaper. The other is also a reliable and independent source but the coverage isn't significant, in my opinion, as the article is about a college event.
I've gone through the band's website feed (their Facebook page as their website is just a picture) and can't find any articles that would represent significant and independent coverage from a reliable source. The band seems to have a following and has allegedly "shared the stage" with some notable performers, but doesn't seem to be notable at this time. Perhaps they will be in the future and at that time, the article can be reinstated with additional sources. OlYeller21Talktome 17:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources on this topic. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 08:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relates to promotional activity Deepon (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced article about a non-notable book by a non-notable author. Fails WP:NBOOKS. - MrX 15:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Speedy delete, a7 non notable Jac16888 Talk 15:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article in Arabic, unremarkable person smileguy91talk 14:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was This article was relisted three times and we need to make a decision. Nobody succeeded to find reliable sources about the person, and thus the article has to be deleted. On the other hand, there were hints that such sources can exist, but most likely in Turkish. I conclude thus that there will be no prejudice against re-creating the article provided reliable sources in Turkish have been added which describe the activity of Coşkun Yılmaz, not just mention him.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The subject does not seem to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. This article is entirely due to two single-purpose accounts, which have done nothing but write about Coşkun Yılmaz and his company. The article was speedily deleted under criterion A7, and re-created. Of the four references, two don't mention Coşkun Yılmaz, and one merely includes his name in a list. The other one is on the web site of something describing itself as "Young Businessmen Association of Turkey", and does not seem to be an independent source. In any case, that one page does not constitute sufficient coverage to establish notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User has apologised on his Talk page to another editor
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability Cgwaldman (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AllyD (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Green in Islam. Black Kite (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Color/Principles clearly states that "Wikipedia may include articles on colour names only where there is sufficient notable and verifiable information available to write a non-stub article on aspects of the use of the color name." (emphasis added) There is already an article which describes the importance of green in Islam and there is hardly any other information in this article which is not present in Shades of green. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
After 6 years, WP:NOTABILITY not established. There is some indication of significance, but I do't think there's enough to establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:17, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article describes two different 56-card decks of playing cards; however, after some research I can find no evidence that either deck is used for any game, current or historical, nor can I find evidence that either is commercially available, other than by removing cards from a French-suited tarot deck. Indefatigable (talk) 21:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No consensus to merge, but there is definitely a strong sense that this list should be kept.....somewhere. That's what talkpages are for, closing this as Keep. Keeper | 76 19:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a possibly complete bibliography of an author who may well be notable, but has very few sources to verify even that. The bibliography is wholly unverified and with the patents (?!?) appears to be more promotional than anything. There are some guidelines for this type of article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies; a quick look at WP:NOTESAL already suggests this is not notable, since there is no evidence that the man's work as a whole has been discussed in a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 04:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable amateur soccer league. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:NSPORT.
All references in the article seem to be primary sources that do not represent significant coverage from an independent and reliable source.
The league is not included in the list of leagues kept by Wikipedia:WikiProject Football to assist with assessing notability.
A Google News search produces one hit that's from a local blog which can't be used to establish notability. A Google News Archive search produces two articles. One appears to be a forum and the other is a local news source that doesn't constitute significant coverage, in my opinion (it's just about soccer in the US, the league is only mentioned in passing). In short, I haven't found a single article that represents significant coverage from an independent and reliable sources.
The only claim of importance I see (the only reason I didn't nominate for A7) is that many notable people have played in the league. Notable athletes have played in many amateur leagues but that doesn't make them notable by any part of WP:N.
On a side note, the author may call you a secret racist or leave an odd message on your talk page regarding his feelings about people who are gay, incest, drug and alcohol abuse, dyslexia, "muscular orgasms", and racism. So... good luck with that. OlYeller21Talktome 04:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it.
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| babble _ 17:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG. No significant coverage of the organization in secondary reliable sources independent of the subject. Location (talk) 03:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCOLLATH. I only found two independent mentions about him, and both were when he was mentioned as a possible head coach candidate for UAB. All other Google hits are player or coach bio pages off of school websites. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ‑Scottywong| chatter _ 17:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that it meets required notability, specifically WP:MUSIC or WP:GNG Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ‑Scottywong| communicate _ 17:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable podcast. Insufficient justification of notability under WP:GNG or WP:WEB. Unsourced fanboy boats are not sufficient indicators of notability. GrapedApe (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Atlantima (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Laurenhennessy (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was MERGE to Keith and the Girl. SpinningSpark 14:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable podcast host. Comedy career and books authored are not enough to establish notability. GrapedApe (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a1, very short article with insufficient context. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable topic. I searched it on Google and there are some results saying that it is usually a "fight-ending" move. Also, the title 'Pokemon' is not plausible. Mediran (t • c) 01:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is essentially a self-sourced and pay-to-play-sourced article and therefore fails to establish notability per WP:NSOFT. —Waldhorn (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Darla dirladada. Black Kite (talk) 11:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable folk song, very few sources Revolution1221 (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Darla dirladada. Older and larger article on the same subject.Asilv (talk) 11:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable performing group. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources and notable mentions in Google News. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 04:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are no reliable sources on this topic. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 08:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per WP:A7. — CactusWriter (talk) 06:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I looked on Google, and 'Rildi Lumi' exists only on social networking sites such as Facebook. Even if he does exist, he is not notable enough to deserve an article. Also, the creator Klaudio hoxha K.A.H claims to be a 'game hacker' - K.A.H. is supposedly short for 'Klaudio Albania Hacker'. If you look at his talk page, he attempted to make his autobiography put in article space, which might be due to misunderstanding. He also seems to have rewritten an article called Dídac Vilà. He also edit warred in Xherdan Shaqiri, although our policy on birthplaces make clear that we use the historical periods that they were born in. The edit war was nationalistic in character, and he was being ridiculous claiming that Shaqiri was born in Kosovo, a nonexistent entity at the time. This is akin to saying that Sargon was born in Iraq. The same thing happened for Lorik Cana and Granit Xhaka. He added a probable hoax in Giampaolo Pazzini and Francesco Acerbi. He uploaded a copyright violating file, which has since been deleted. He also wrote his autobioraphy, yet again, which has also been deleted. This should be deleted, Klaudio hoxha K.A.H blocked indefinitely, and all contributions undone.--Seonookim (What I've done so far) (I'm busy here) (Tell me your requests) 01:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was DELETE. SpinningSpark 17:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One month stable. No much duration as a stable, we can mention it in the article of the wrestlers HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was MERGE. SpinningSpark 16:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable EP, the only significant coverage is in a Tellymix article. The sources are almost all to iTunes user reviews, which are hardly reliable. I can't find any other review or significant coverage about the EP (she was more widely reported for her affair with her mentor on The Voice). Sionk (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep without preudice to renominate it in May, when the album is actually out and we can judge better what to do with the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An album yet to be released, by a barely notable musician. Article is mainly sourced to brief articles that don't talk about the album, for example Tellymix about her previous EP, Music News which fails to mention the album at all, a 'Twitter' comment etc. Fails WP:NMUSIC and meets WP:TOOSOON. Sionk (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regards to your claim that the artist fails WP:NMUSIC - this article claims that a musician or ensemble should achieve just one of the criterion to achieve validity. The artist in question meets the following 6 items from the 'Criteria for musicians and ensembles': 1. Numerous publications. 2. Bo Bruce, Search The Night reached number 2 on UK iTunes album chart in 2012. 4. National tour 2013 - UK. As well as performances at major UK festivals in 2012 and 2013. 9. Second place The Voice UK series 1. 11. Lead single (from the album in question) currently in rotation on BBC Radio 2, amongst other radio stations and all major music video channels. 12. The Voice UK. I will of course be willing to expand on any of the above points, should you wish.
Also, with regards to the referral to WP:TOOSOON, could you perhaps clarify your views on this, to help me better understand and respond to your concerns? As this article mentions only Actors and Films - the article being considered for deletion here is neither of these.
The article in question has already been rated on the WikiProject Albums scope (which can be viewed on the talk page of the article) and was not considered for deletion at that point.
I think it should also be important to consider Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline, in particular view two, which states "We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting a new article unless its potential significance cannot be established." In my opinion, the significance of this article is justified (as detailed in my first paragraph).
However, I completely agree that this article can, and of course should, be improved -and I would be willing to improve the page and search out better sources.
I look forward to your response and hopefully being able to resolve any issues! Thank you for your time. Gracec250 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Michig (talk) 07:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. ‑Scottywong| confabulate _ 16:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of independent circuit, non-affiliated or retired professional wrestlers, a random list about tag teams in wrestling. We have categories. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was 'Rename to Violence in Buddhism'. (non-admin closure) Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The title of the article may be considered a neologism, with not enough citations to justify an article. content could be merged with persecution of Muslims in Burma, but my motivation in nominating is to make sure this gets eyeballs commensurate with the seriousness of the subject, and gets covered without WP:Undue Weight, and with WP:NPOV. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List of Buddhist Terrorist organizations Declared by multiple nations and Research organizations.