![]() |
< 12 January | 14 January > |
---|
The result was speedy deleted by Fastily as "(G2: Test page)". Non-admin closure — Frankie (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced and I question whether it conforms to the general notability guidelines. Ceradon talkcontribs 17:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have completed my Masters in Information Management at Victoria University, NZ. I am proposing to proceed to doctorate research around these concepts.
My hypothesis is that information and technology consumers are now flooded with information and options, the roles of information classification and brokerage will become more important to the consumer.
At the project level this means that mainly project sponsors and owners, but also any stakeholders, now find that they are be negotiating with multiple project managers and members from many companies and organisations in many countries. A project broker will provide this negotiation and brokerage service.
I would like to use Wikipedia to develop this framework with people in the global community.
— User:Geeklee 22:52, 13 January 2012
The result was keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are all primary plus one dead link, and the article is written suspiciously like WP:GARAGEBAND. Interchangeable|talk to me 00:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. WP:BLP1E and unsourced. Cloudz679 23:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another mickey mouse tournament of a bunch of celebrities having a jolly. Just because they're "celebrities" doesn't make their cricket or this tournament notable. A previous incarnation of a CCL article was deleted last year, having been deemed non-notable and failing WP:CRIN and WP:GNG. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy redirect to Simon Janashia Museum of Georgia. (as nom) Correct museum identified. Will redirect. No need for this to run. StarM 23:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know that ghits don't mean anything but this museum is lacking any evidence that it exists, let alone is notable. While English language sources are likely an issue, I cannot even find mention of this in guide books or even travel blogs. I cannot imagine this would be the case if it were a notable museum. I'm of course happy to be proven wrong with coverage, but I cannot find anything to suggest notability. StarM 22:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC) StarM 22:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is a theatre called Rustaveli State Academic Theater . the flickr uploader here calls it Rustaveli Museum. Its the Simon Janashia Museum of Georgia it seems but its located on Rustaveli Avenue so he probably just called it that i say redirect to Simon Janashia Museum of Georgia.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, dictionary definition, no indication of general use Acroterion (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 02:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as notability has not been demonstrated nor any independent sources provided, despite tagging with these requirements in July 2010. – Fayenatic (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For over 4 years of tagging no notability nor independent refs provided neither for song nor for authors Muslim lo Juheu (talk) 21:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Jonathan Burton. Speedy close as cut-and-paste-within-Wikipedia-without-attribution copyright violation. If the Burton page should be at this title it can be moved through the normal WP:RM process. The Bushranger One ping only 10:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't meet WP:GNG William 20:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable former leader of a religious group. Article and sources do not meet the threshold for inclusion on WP. Wikidas© 18:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Dan Sanker. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable secondary sources, none found via Google. No indication of notability. Was prodded for these reasons, prod removed by author without improvement. Huon (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiography of a non-notable writer. Claims of awards cannot be verified. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Page about "T.P Venugopalan" is True.Refer these sites www.dcbookstore.com, www.puzha.com, www.weblokam.com(25.10.2006.)Please Protect this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.10.213 (talk) 01:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC) the content about t p venugopalan is correct and true — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.10.213 (talk) 01:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Refer http://www.mathrubhumi.com/books/awards.php?award=24117.206.10.216 (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed on the grounds that the creator took offense to a prod endorser calling it a borderline attack page. No indication that this "catalog" of a person's arm gestures meets notability criteria for inclusion. I'm guessing this is related to John Piper (theologian); assuming it is, since this is sourced to a blog I don't think this content even merits a mention in that article. Wikipedia is not a fansite. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 11:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While the goals towards this person is working are lofty, I don't think that a few mentions in newsletters (even if one is from UNESCO) are enough to establish notability. Does not meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article has modified and tagged with authentic references. This article has 6 references ( 4 from IUCN website, 1 from UNESCO and 1 from conservation evidence journal). In my openion, all are authentic and reliable references. Please share your comments. NehaIndia —Preceding undated comment added 18:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Weak Keep Just passes the threshold of WP:GNG. Here is another ref about guggal and it has info on him. Bgwhite (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes Bgwhite , "Significant coverage" in reputed magazine Down to Earth (Indian science and environment magazine)has also included as reliable reference. NehaIndia —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC). — NehaIndia (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not really "by country", and redundant to List of tallest buildings and structures in the world, List of tallest freestanding structures in the world, List of tallest structures in the world, List of tallest structures in the world by country. Rcsprinter (converse) 16:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. (as none of the content has any reliable source) and redirect to Education in Kuwait#Nursery and primary education, where I have added its name. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deprodded without comment by WP:SPA article creator, my concern remains that I can find no reliable sources indicating notability for this elementary school. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. CactusWriter's work seems to have driven the consensus.--Kubigula (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
per WP:ORG. Political party that has never taken a seat at any level of legislature Ohconfucius ¡digame! 15:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete striking, see below. Doesn't merit a mention in the List of political parties in Denmark article, so certainly not notable. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable musical genre, with one practitioner. References are not reliable (and several are wikipedia links). Article is full of OR Gaijin42 (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are many other practitioners of Tech Beat - entry coming very soon when the current list is collated Editman20 (talk) 16:40, 13 January 2012 (GMT)
Trying my best to comply but having much trouble understanding all Editman20 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2012 (GMT)
RE: "Continuing to remove maintenance templates" - Was completely unintentional and did not know that I had done this.
RE: few participants - Whilst I accept that there are currently few patricipants, Tech Beat was created by the same group of people that created Drum and Bass (roots era of 1989 - 1991 when known as 'Progressive Hardcore') and Raggamuffin Hip Hop (2001). Most are now internationallly known and as with these previous forms, there were only a handful to begin with until it became promoted by 3rd parties as well as by the artists themselves.
One of the reasons that it has been so difficult for others to put together a definitive history of Drum and Bass (for example) is because those involved consciously at the start remained underground and didn't give a title to the new form and so didn't contribute. The result is one mess of a page that is in need of much attention and I feel that this is because it has been left to others outside of the industry to put it all together years later.
To avoid a potential future repetition of all of this with Tech Beat, I'm just trying to do what I feel should have been done first time around (with the relevant 3rd parties at the time) but for Tech Beat - the latest genre from these guys.
Their publishers, record co's and global distributors are supporting the genre and are also talking with many of the shippers to prepare them to follow suit in the near future as more releases come out, supported by live performances at top venues around the world starting early this year (2012).
In light of all of this, it would seem that this form is destined to take-off this year and so would it not be easier all-around, to let the page build naturally over the next 6 months, with a view to deleting it if this doesn't happen?
New genres do not tend to just pop up overnight globally from nowhere. In 25 years of working in the industry as a sound engineer I have always found that it is just small pockets of people working together who initially evolve genres into a new form.
Also, surely Wikipedia requires content submitted from those directly involved, and who therefore know the history intimately, rather than various commentators who may of had little direct involvement. (More artists will me added to the list very soon) Editman20 (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Editman20Editman20 (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have to say that [leaving aside the issue of content quality], I do understand and accept the argument. On this basis, more than happy to let you guys decide what to do [even though there does seem to be only one objector]. Was just trying to prevent potential future problems re: content accuracy. Thanks for trying to sort it with me anyway. Editman20 (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Editman20Editman20 (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your point, thanks for explaining.Editman20 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)editman20Editman20 (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Though I will say that to avoid another AfD, more of those sources Carrite mentions should be added in as soon as possible The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable secondary sources, no significant coverage found via Google. I'm rather surprised that there is no such coverage, but all I could find were various newspaper articles mentioning that the Foundation had handed out this or that award to a local band, with the foundation only mentioned in passing. The article has been tagged for improved references since June 2008. Apparently none are to be found. Thus the topic fails the general notability guideline and WP:ORG. Huon (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested BLP:PROD. Still no references. I can't find independent articles in English or Japanese. Japanese sites are just mirrors of Japanese Wikipedia article or websites associated with the individual. Given the name of user who created the article, may also be COI violation. Fails WP:ARTIST. Michitaro (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. The article has undergone drastic change from the time it was originally nominated for deletion, so much that no consensus can possibly be determined from this debate. No consensus, with leave to speedy renominate if anyone feels it necessary. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
1. Article does not contain any 3rd party references to indicate notability. 2. I've done a google search to attempt to find references, top 4 or 5 results aren't even about this artist, rest are dubious my space/facebook/twitter pages. Not a good sign of notability. GimliDotNet (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete, organization with no showing of minimal importance. Full text: The Monarchy of Zeymah is a micronation founded January 12, 2012 by its three citizens, Alex Smith, Joe Stockert, and Kevin Tang. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:MADEUP Shirt58 (talk) 13:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:NOT. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed prod. As the author has stated on the talk page 'I intended this page not as an article on its own but as supplement...' This is not so much a demonstration of a mathematical proof as an exhaustive listing of the various iterations one can put the different pieces in. Of no encyclopaedic value, a link to the programme that calculates this table could be included in the external links of the Battleship (game) page. Benea (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This company lacks any significant coverage in secondary sources. The kinds of search results I found are press-release or "self-publishy"-type articles from sources that lack editorial independence. Therefore, delete, as notability has not been established. SENATOR2029 talk 12:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Both references and external links show notability of the concept, but this SaaS itself fails WP:GNG. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. In accordance with usual AFD custom, comments from new and unregistered users have been given less weight. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article previously deleted in AFD process, several prior WP:SPEEDY nominations contested. Still the article lacks any references that could be used to establish notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Side note: back in 2006 the article about this software was created by user:Stefantch (see contributions) and speedy deleted soon after that. This article was later re-created by user:KTMG (see contributions) now mainly defended by User:Stefanch2 (see contributions). Pretty alarming IMHO. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another Side note: The article already passed the notability review in 2009 [37]. Why Dmitrij D. Czarkoff is questioning it now? And why Dmitrij D. Czarkoff is the ony one who wants it deleted? Pretty alarming IMHO. Stefanch2 (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Funny, I don't remember it happening that way, and I'm the author. I was given a chance by the reviewer to add more links in order to get past the review. That is all! It was not taken simply on my word that the topic was notable, and I don't believe that any reviewer here would simply take any single users word on the issue. That said, the page has been altered quite a bit since I wrote it, and need to have the commercial aspect taken out. Lets be honest, a fair number of smaller companies are listed here. Does Tekserve really need a page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekserve ? No, but we as a community allow it because they provide a service and the page is encyclopedic in nature. PS- next time you are getting ready to delete a page, you might want to notify the author and not just the frequent editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTMG (talk • contribs) 03:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Another Side note: He also questions another well known article Meebo and seems he is the only one who wants it deleted too. His arguments there are also weak as here. Pretty alarming IMHO. Stefanch2 (talk) 23:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found some links that might be helpful for the notoriety issue to help the discussion not go around in circles, as it seems to be doing. Here are the links:
Would any of these qualify as notable enough? I think that Tech Crunch is certainly reliable and well known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.238.73 (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PROD with contested with the rationale "Remove Prod. Played in 3 games for a team in the Pakistan Premier League, the top professional football league in Pakistan", but the PPL is not a fully-professional league, meaning that he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. He also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 09:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was 'KEEP' Toddst1 (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This individual is notable - he meets WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG - but he has requested (via e-mails to myself) that we delete the article as he is worried about vandalism, as well as other concerns from his family. I posted at WP:BLPN and got no real help, and tried at WP:RPP to protect the article so that only registered users could edit as a compromise, but that request was declined. I informed him of this and he came back to me saying that he wants it deleted, so I'm putting it up here. I'd also ask that after deletion (if it happens) this page and redirects are SALTed to prevent further creation by well-meaning editors.GiantSnowman 09:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Survivor: South Pacific. The "keep" !voters do not give policy-based arguments for retention. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notability rests on one event: the subject's participation in Survivor: South Pacific.
The result was no consensus. Perhaps a discussion could be held regarding the exact definition of "high school." King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Middle schools and lower grades are not generally notable under wp standards, and are subject to deletion/redirect; this appears to be one of the NN ones. Epeefleche (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, rationale was "WP:NN product. A great example of why Wikipedia needs a speedy deletion criterion for articles about products that do not assert the product's notability or importance.". Listing here due to lack of notability which I doubt sourcing could really solve. tutterMouse (talk) 00:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was REDIRECT to Kit Berry. Jeremy (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unreferenced (since 2005), in-universe page about a fictional town in a book series written by a non-notable self-published author. The article was written by an editor whose main contributions were about the author and the books. (The books are said to be published by Moongazy Publishing, which I've discovered is a company that the author herself created. [46]) A search brought up nothing to show that the series as a whole or the author are notable, let alone the fictional town the series is set in. The author's page seems to have been redirected to Stonewylde due to a lack of sources. It's borderline promotional enough to be speedied, but vague enough that I'm taking it to AfD. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
The result was redirect and merge to Mac Aodhagáin. I will also add this to Category:Redirects with possibilities in case anyone is able to find something later The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find substantial RS coverage (or non-RS coverage, for that matter) of this person under Gnews, Gbooks, and Gscholar. Epeefleche (talk) 06:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Tanisha Lynn. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This character has no significant storylines, background, relevance, or impact on culture. To determine this character's meets of general notability, I tried searching this character's name, including Reed, but no significant coverages of this character were found, including news and books. Also, this character lasted for about two years, and suddenly, the only coverages she had are trivial, including reports of this role's portrayer, Tanisha Lynn. Also, this article consists of only fictional background, which violates "What Wikipedia is not". I could not find receptions of this character from non-primary authentic sources. This article was previously proposed for deletion; even after removal of PROD, there have been no efforts to balance reality and fiction. George Ho (talk) 09:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Ariana Grande. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article for this song is currently not warranted. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 00:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
A music article with no chart performance is not applicable for an article. Jared martinez gwapo (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Rutgers Scarlet Knights. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability, as mandated by WP:GNG. Fails WP:MUSIC as well. Earlier AFD was procedural keep. GrapedApe (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any reliable third-party sources on this chain of language schools, and so I don't think they pass WP:ORG. Also, as they are language schools and not high schools there doesn't seem to be any reason for us to automatically consider them notable. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 04:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Harmony Korine. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Prod was contested) 2013 movie, proposing deletion per WP:CRYSTAL. Current sources are IMDB, Perez Hilton and two less remarkable hollywood/gossip sites. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For policy, just going to quote WP:N here. For reasons grounded in reality, it's a magnet for trivia, and I doubt that any references or notability can be presented. Charles D. Ward (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This film appears to fail all aspects of WP:FILM. Very little content or context in article and no sources. PROD declined by an IP that is likely the article creator. Delete Safiel (talk) 01:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article makes no claim of significance other than "became famous with their different sound". References are wiki's, blogs, unaccessible, and the last one is primary/trivial. v/r - TP 15:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Despite references and other appearances to the contrary, this is not an encyclopedia article, it is written like an essay or college paper, comparing 6 different views on a particular subject. I have thought long and hard about whether it can be rescued, but the basic problem is that such a "symposium" is not an encyclopedic subject, it is original research. ukexpat (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Unaccompanied Sonata and Other Stories. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Although the author is notable for other works, the article gives no reason to think that this particular short story is particularly notable, and the article consists only of a plot summary. I put a notability tag on it in March of last year, and in the intervening nine months nobody has put forth any arguments saying that the story is notable (for that matter, nobody made any changes to the article at all). So I propose that the article should be deleted as not notable; if an editor wanted to add content about the story, it could easily be added to the article on the short story collection of which it is a part. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 14:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zero refs. I've searched his name under various variations, but not found RS substantial support for his notability. Tagged as non-notable, and for absence of refs, for over a year. Created by a one-article-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 05:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zero refs. Dearth of RS coverage. And not even any RS-supported content to merge to the tribe it is putatively part of. Tagged for both lack of notability and lack of refs for 3 years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Kit Berry. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exists, but I can't find sufficient non-trivial, non-local RS coverage. Epeefleche (talk) 04:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Kit Berry. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exists, but I can't find sufficient non-trivial, non-local RS coverage. Zero refs in the article. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 04:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
University admission information page which fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 21:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, concern was "Non-notable list written in an innapropriate tone." Cloudz679 20:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability under WP:Notability (films). No reliable sources. Thorncrag 02:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]