< April 07 April 09 >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient. If someone wants to work on this, I'm happy to draftify Star Mississippi 12:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 Indian Women's League season[edit]

2022–23 Indian Women's League season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another ridiculous contested redirect, with zero in-depth coverage from independent sources. So now we're here. Onel5969 TT me 16:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is it ridiculous when the source is from the website of the governing body itself?! Ghdfghmp (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GNG requires reliable sources independent of the subject which the governing body wouldn't be Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No sources in article or above are IS RS SIGCOV. BEFORE showed nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Oppose Draft as a backdoor to deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  13:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tapur Chatterjee[edit]

Tapur Chatterjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable model. None of the references highlights her modelling achievements. Sourcing is scrappy to say the least, passing mentions, puff pieces (too many about her efforts to 'clean rivers', which is not a claim for notability advanced in the article) and references which do not get us past WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Khorang 20:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Well-known (former) model and grandchild of popular actor. Tapur Chatterjee appears regularly in Indian newspapers and news sites. Jaireeodell (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, After doing a Google News search, I found plenty of sources. She is a popular model in India and majority of news are from Indian publications. The publications mostly look reliable such as India Express and Hindustan Times. I updated with few new citations. Royal88888 (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete BLP. Sources in the article and BEFORE show all promo, interviews, etc. As stated above [1] and [2] are the best and they are clearly promo and interview. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per V, BLP and BIO.  // Timothy :: talk  05:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's all fluff coverage. A Hindustan Times article about your choice's for a child's nursery is not what we're looking for. I can't find anything extra. Oaktree b (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am discounting the opinions by Kailash29792 and DeluxeVegan because they violate WP:NPA in that they accuse those who support deletion of "systemic bias" and "ignorance" or "being clueless". If you continue to make such contributions to deletion discussions, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Looking at the remaining "keep" opinions, they mostly fail to address the arguments given in the deletion nomination and by TimothyBlue: at most, they allege that the film is covered in sources, but they do not indicate which specific source establishes the notability of the topic and why. In part, the "keep" opinions are mere speculations about the popularity of the film, which is irrelevant for our purposes. Consequently, the "keep" opinions are unconvincing and must be given less weight when assessing consensus. The article can be undeleted or recreated once the film gets sufficient coverage in reliable sources, presumably if and when it is being released. Sandstein 08:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger 3[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Tiger 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was AfD'd last year, and still no indication this film meets WP:NFILM, let alone WP:GNG. Additionally, there is an existing draft, which should have been worked on and submitted. Would have restored the redirect, but recent discussions at ANI no longer leave that option, since the redirect was contested. Onel5969 TT me 11:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think that the article have enough sources and its production is also noticable, so please do not consider it for deletion purposes. User:MNWiki845 (talk) 2:00, 4 April 2023 (IST)

Keep: meets the criteria described at WP:NFF, despite the current agenda drive to misinterpret it. It's impossible for an unreleased film to have in-depth analysis about it in the press. So unless there is a rule that explicitly prohibits all unreleased films that are currently filming/in post-prod to have not articles, this agenda needs to stop. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFF, "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."
And nothing gets a pass on WP:V and WP:N.  // Timothy :: talk  18:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And production becomes notable when filming begins and there is sufficient media coverage on it (which is clearly the case here), and not when there is "in-depth analysis" of unreleased films (which obviously will never happen). Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, just like at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal (2023 film) this is going to be relisted multiple times, and despite getting more "keep" votes, it will be deleted. Why even bother with this charade of asking for people's opinion when they won't be respected? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as per Box Office India.

Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 08:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abuja Chamber of Commerce and Industry[edit]

Abuja Chamber of Commerce and Industry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organisation not notable, due to sources not meeting WP:ORGDEPTH. 180.150.37.213 (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Tinpo Lee[edit]

Andrew Tinpo Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A working actor, his most significant role was on General Hospital, but I'm not sure how significant that role was. Other than that, no other roles which are significant, so fails WP:NACTOR. Also, not enough in-depth coverage of him to show that he meets WP:GNG. The mentions he gets all have to do with his more famous daughter, Peyton, and notability is not inherited. Onel5969 TT me 12:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Techoliver298 is the creator and major contributor to the disputed text. -The Gnome (talk) 16:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to WTF with Marc Maron. Consensus is to delete or redirect. The delete rationales argued against the suitability of a standalone article but did not discount or argue against redirecting the article. Aoidh (talk) 03:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of WTF with Marc Maron episodes[edit]

List of WTF with Marc Maron episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirected by Pppery. Then contested. Not enough sourcing to meet WP:VERIFY. And currently fails notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 11:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As redirector, my rationale was that the only reason given for unredirecting was a clearly-false claim of vandalism. The reason for the second unredirection was WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is only slightly better, so restore redirect due to the lack of any policy-based argument for unredirection provided in any of the three attempts. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crexendo[edit]

Crexendo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "article" is hopeless, weak, references, no intro, and seems to be a rough draft in hopes it being kept. Ebbedlila (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source eval:
BEFORE showed more promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  01:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club[edit]

List of footballers with 300 or more Premier League appearances for one club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

topic fails WP:GNG due to severe lack of in depth coverage in independent and reliable sources All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep: Passes CLN and AOAL. Should only contain sourced and notable items.  // Timothy :: talk  22:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dentsply Sirona. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sirona Dental Systems[edit]

Sirona Dental Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

although this was listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange, the references seem very weak. The prose seem to be a factsheet, not really encyclopedic. Ebbedlila (talk) 20:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio giuliano 21:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lakeland Industries[edit]

Lakeland Industries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

although this is listed on the NASDAQ stock exchange, the references are very weak. The prose seem to be a factsheet, not really encyclopedic. Ebbedlila (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source eval:
  • Stock price database record :: 1.  "Lakeland Industries, Inc. stock price". Marketwatch.com. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
  • Funding website company database record :: 2. ^ Jump up to:a b "Lakeland Industries, Inc. History". FundingUniverse. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  • Stock price database record :: 3. ^ "Lakeland Industries, Inc.: NASDAQ:LAKE quotes & news - Google". Retrieved March 9, 2014.
  • SEC form 10-K, failed V, 404 :: 4. ^ Jump up to:a b "Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Lakeland Industries Inc". Retrieved 2022-07-14.
  • Stock price database record :: 5. ^ "LAKE stock quote - Lakeland Industries, Inc. stock price - NASDAQ". Nasdaq.com. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
  • Stock price database record :: 6. ^ "LAKE: Summary for Lakeland Industries, Inc.- Yahoo! Finance". Finance.yahoo.com. Retrieved March 9, 2014.
BEFORE showed more promo and primary, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  01:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Aoidh (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thangalaan[edit]

Thangalaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about an as yet unreleased film, not properly sourced as the subject of sufficient production coverage to meet WP:NFF instead of regular WP:NFILM criteria. As written, this is referenced entirely to the film's IMDb page and a YouTube copy of its trailer, which are not support for notability at all -- the notability test for films hinges on third-party coverage about the film in media, such as reviews by professional film critics, news coverage about the production, and on and so forth. Obviously no prejudice against recreation if and when it does get released, but a film's own self-created web presence isn't the kind of sourcing we need to make it notable enough for inclusion. Bearcat (talk) 19:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Films are not automatically notable the moment principal photography has commenced — WP:NFF is a secondary path for extremely high profile films that generate such a deluge of production coverage that even if they failed they'd still be permanently notable as failed productions anyway, not the primary notability criterion for all films. Basically, very few films short of the Marvel or Star Wars franchises are ever supposed to get "as soon as principal photography has commenced" notability under NFF — the vast majority of films have to meet "has been released and reviewed by professional film critics" notability under regular plain old NFILM criteria. Bearcat (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 18:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danda Russo[edit]

Danda Russo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorialized WP:BLP of an actor and filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion criteria for actors or filmmakers. As always, every person in the film industry is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because there are film credits listed in it -- the notability test depends on the reception of real, reliable third party media coverage about her and her performances to satisfy WP:GNG, not just on listing roles per se. But there isn't any GNG-worthy coverage about her being cited here at all -- the only reference in the entire article is the self-published website of the university she attended, and even that is just serving to verify that the screenwriting program exists while not even glancingly mentioning Danda Russo at all, and the writing tone is dancing perilously close to being speediable as a G11 (though stopping just marginally short of being blatant enough to activate my deletion trigger finger.)
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she has a stronger notability claim than just existing and legitimate GNG-worthy reliable sourcing to support a properly and neutrally written article, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to keep an article that's written and sourced like this. Bearcat (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Satellite tornado. Star Mississippi 18:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of tornadoes with confirmed satellite tornadoes[edit]

List of tornadoes with confirmed satellite tornadoes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This tornado likely fails notability guidelines, with concerns raised from a few editors on the talk page a year ago. It will hopelessly be an incomplete hodgepodge of guesses and maybes. Now it even has a “potential” section. The whole thing just doesn’t seem rooted in verifiable, relevant information and seems superfluous and unnecessary in regards to the article satellite tornado and Wikipedia in general. United States Man (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 18:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mamadou Diawara (footballer)[edit]

Mamadou Diawara (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. There is only one source in the article, an interview with trivial prose. I was unable to find anything better during a search. Alvaldi (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Das osmnezz, you can of course express at any time your opinions about "pro-deletion" editors but here they prove to be counter productive, since they distract from the AfD process. Better to bring such observations or grievances to an appropriate forum, such as ANI or the AfD talk page. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 18:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Massri[edit]

Felipe Massri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Of the sources in the article, [15] is a player profile on his team site, [16] is a match report on an opposing team site, [17] is an interview on Youtube, [18] is a Facebook post, [19] is mostly just quotes from an interview, [20] is a match report of a U-23 team with a trivial mention. I was unable to find any better sources during a search. Alvaldi (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 18:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of most-played video games by player count[edit]

List of most-played video games by player count (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like the List of fastest-selling products, this list makes apples-to-oranges comparisons between fundamentally different and incompatible measures. Downloads =/= registered accounts =/= daily/monthly active users =/= owners on Steam =/= retail sales. Some of these are time based and change from month to month (do you pick the highest ever point?). Some of these are trivial (it takes no effort to download and never launch a game and some companies have been known to puff their download numbers with bot accounts). Every company has a slightly different definition for a valid "player count", which is optimized to make them look good. Unlike "highest-selling" games which is tracked by independent auditors, I don't know that a true and validly sourced "list of most-played games" is possible, given the state of reporting on this topic in the games industry.

There is also the separate issue that this article was heavily edited by Maestro2016 (aka Jagged 85), who is notorious for misrepresenting and often outright falsifying sources. Any conclusion to this AFD should recommend an action with respect to this, whether that's draftifying until his contributions are verified/stripped out, or WP:TNT, or another solution. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Acevedo[edit]

Diego Acevedo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Of the sources in the article, [21] is a player profile on his team site, [22] is a Youtube video by a Youtuber who takes video requests, [23] another Youtube video, this time by his team, [24] mentions him once in a list of U-23 players, [25] is series of qoutes from the player with no prose. I was unable to find any significant sources during a search. The article has already been draftified but was moved back to mainspace one day later without any significant improvements. Alvaldi (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Chamorro[edit]

Felipe Chamorro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Of the sources in the article, [26] is a Facebook post, and [27] and [28] are trivial reports of him being added to the active roster, both from 22 January 2023. I was unable to find any better sources during a search. The article has already been drafted but was moved back to mainspace the day after without any new sources being added. Alvaldi (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep The result was keep WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Bruxton (talk) 12:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Young-nam[edit]

Jo Young-nam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. The only sourced used in the article is actually more about a different person. The article is only 3 sentences long. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 16:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dalbit Petroleum[edit]

Dalbit Petroleum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Lamanauskas[edit]

Tomas Lamanauskas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable person. Re-created by a related party after the article was deleted via PROD. Renata•3 01:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that the previous Deputy Secretary-General was Malcolm Johnson (administrator), the is an article on his. As on the DSG before Houlin Zhao. Bquast (talk) 12:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Complementando: su página oficial en inglés - https://www.itu.int/en/osg/dsg/Pages/default.aspx y español, https://www.itu.int/es/osg/dsg/Pages/default.aspx
Electo por la Asemblea Plenipotenciaria de la UIT enoctobre 2022, ref https://pp22.itu.int/en/elections/elections-results/ Simaocampos (talk) 08:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seeming notable and having sources that discuss him are two different things. Oaktree b (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Specific citations in support of our arguments are needed, Geezerberkhout. And interviews have a hard time making it on their own. As to the consensus you are seeing, there isn't here. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Kaunda Chinoya[edit]

Fred Kaunda Chinoya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly recreated in the last few weeks. Taking to AfD to hopefully establish some sort of consensus. Sources exist about him but I'm concerned that they aren't WP:RS. For example, I found Simdif but it looks like it might be user-generated (I'm not familiar with it). Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motorcenter Norway[edit]

Motorcenter Norway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect, without improvements, with zero in-depth coverage from reliable independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no in-depth coverage. Onel5969 TT me 13:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Denuwan Sri Bandara[edit]

Denuwan Sri Bandara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, COI/UPE creation, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantinos Feutchine[edit]

Konstantinos Feutchine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. Was draftified, and then returned to mainspace without any in-depth coverage of this player. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator after improvements by Folly Mox. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 09:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Yong'an[edit]

Siege of Yong'an (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show this meets WP:GNG, but that could be because of the language barrier. Current sourcing does not have enough information to show whether or not they pass WP:VERIFY, was draftified in hopes of improvement, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. Onel5969 TT me 13:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Onel5969: thanks for your work. We rooted out most of the trivial and fictitious stuff from the Three Kingdoms space feels like over a decade ago now. There is one very productive editor in the space – don't remember who – who uses this idiosyncratic citation style, but for a subject matter expert these are trivially verifiable online. Of course like everything else in the period it's been studied to pieces by later scholars but the early sources are already secondary and way easier to access. I don't have access to a physical copy of the Book of Jin anymore, but I've got a printed version of 三國志注 right here so I can get those citations into a state where they conform to house style more closely. I'll bold a keep or speedy keep here in a few hours once I tackle that. Folly Mox (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ping me when you do, and I'll withdraw the nomination. Onel5969 TT me 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969: I've improved the citation style of the article. I'm not able to get to the granularity of page numbers for the Book of Jin citations, but most people will be verifying in html anyway, where they're not preserved. Please let me know if there's anything else required. Thanks again. Folly Mox (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, they're probably busy. Keep I guess before I forget about this. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Not in reference to the article under discussion, but upon closer inspection it turns out a bunch of cruft and trivia has snuck back into some of our Three Kingdoms articles somehow over the past decade. 奈何 Folly Mox (talk) 08:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, didn't get your ping. Thanks for the efforts. Onel5969 TT me 09:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vilde Bakke-Andersen[edit]

Vilde Bakke-Andersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same situation as WP:AFD/Hannah Handeland and WP:AFD/Nora Heggheim. The subject is a practitioner of amateur sports that does not meet WP:SIGCOV, in that little coverage exists, and this little coverage isn't significant either. The article was attempted "salvaged" by adding references to winning a children's cup and other participation in children's sports, which was frankly not worth the effort, other than underpinning the guideline failure. Geschichte (talk) 12:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nara Tehsil[edit]

Nara Tehsil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect. Zero sourcing to show this place exists (only ref does not mention this place). Onel5969 TT me 12:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Bridge Federation[edit]

Australian Bridge Federation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested prod with zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up any either. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caveginia Primary School[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Caveginia Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable primary school, keeps being recreated by COI/UPE editor. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2026 FIFA World Cup. Courcelles (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC first round[edit]

2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC first round (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect. A case of WP:TOOSOON, but right now, not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tré Mitford[edit]

Tré Mitford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect without improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Ahmad (footballer)[edit]

Ibrahim Ahmad (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Was created back in the day before WP:NOLYMPICS was changed. Onel5969 TT me 11:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Takara. Courcelles (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Walkie bits[edit]

Walkie bits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for well over a decade. Zero in-depth coverage either currently, or found in searches. Was boldly, and correctly, imho, redirected to Takara, where it is mentioned, by 162 etc.. But that redirect was contested, without comment or improvement. So we we are here. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 10:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Found sufficient coverage that passes WP:GNG. No point in wasting anybodies time. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 10:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja'Mal Green[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Ja'Mal Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. UPE. No indication of being notable. No real WP:SECONDARY coverage. scope_creepTalk 10:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gaziosmanpaşa Anatolian High School[edit]

Gaziosmanpaşa Anatolian High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been around for years without any in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up enough coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 10:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Morgan Capital[edit]

Alpha Morgan Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are business news, press releases, PR and routine coverage. scope_creepTalk 10:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some improvements in the article, which includes the deletion of perceived PR coverage. I think it now qualifies for publication on Wikipedia Portablenenka (talk) 03:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your a WP:SPA and and a WP:UPE. scope_creepTalk 08:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked as a sock. I knew it right enough. scope_creepTalk 10:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Per G5, it was created by a WP:SOCK who was already blocked. Wesoree (Talk) 13:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A2A Simulations[edit]

A2A Simulations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. What refs are there is routine coverage. scope_creepTalk 10:27, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 10:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of water shortages[edit]

List of water shortages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1 member "list". Pelmeen10 (talk) 10:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

water shortages redirects to Water scarcity, and list examples there. This article was created with a single entry in 2011‎ and not expanded, nor is likely to ever be. A list article with only one entry is worthless. Dream Focus 22:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5 Jimlantabanao). UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DXMK-TV[edit]

DXMK-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Television station doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Constellation HomeBuilder Systems[edit]

Constellation HomeBuilder Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, company seems to lack independent coverage meeting the WP:CORPDEPTH thresholds. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Slim[edit]

Lady Slim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are non-English so this was tough. I went through them with Google Translate and the only source I see as reliable is BBC. With that said, I found nothing reliable in English and also asked for assistance] at WikiProject Azerbaijan but the only response(s) was from this] SPA (named Dragqueen Lady Slim coincidentally) and this new account with only three edits. CNMall41 (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to Keep but with advice to delistify or restructure this article so some editorial work needs to be done. Liz Read! Talk! 07:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of manifestos of mass killers[edit]

List of manifestos of mass killers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This feels like an absolutely inappropriate article that has no encyclopedic value whatsoever and only seems to promote mass killers' manifestos. Any information on these manifestos is best left to the main articles themselves. Love of Corey (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and potentially restructure into proper article about mass killer manifestos, per 35.139.154.158. Koopinator (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Mortal Kombat characters#Nightwolf. Consensus is this can be covered within the list. Star Mississippi 17:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nightwolf[edit]

Nightwolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | [since nomination])
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure how the 2nd nom works, but I'm open for criticism on this nom. After the last afd nom was kept as "no consensus," the merge arguments, like those from Czar, Beemer69 and Zxcvbnm, seem to be more accurate, and the article looks almost the same since the nom. There were no improvements at all. An IGN source was the only good thing here, but TheGamer source is weak. Which the article still fails Significant coverage. The Eurogamer [38] which discussing him as a dlc is kinda meh. Most of the sources provided were trivial or user submissions. Since the article was kept as "no consensus," I would reinstate it again and want a clear consensus. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 05:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tafadzwa Musakwa[edit]

Tafadzwa Musakwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only umpired in domestic matches and two WODI matches per database sources. Doesn't pass the inclusion criteria for umpires, didn't receive any significant coverage either.RoboCric (talk) 04:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining delete proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kaleidoscope Superior[edit]

Kaleidoscope Superior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this album is notable. Bedivere (talk) 04:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The three ratings in the article are plenty evidence of notability already, and I found a few more sources ([39][40][41][42][43]) which shore that up nicely. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autonational Rescue[edit]

Autonational Rescue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. HAs been an orphan since 2016 and has been written like an ad since 2011. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Boyle (financier)[edit]

Patrick Boyle (financier) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, self promotion Mimi Ho Kora (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Having a SIGCOV article in Bloomberg.com about you is a big deal. I also see other sources using him (although very briefly) as a subject-matter expert, which could push him over meeting NPROF C7: Audioholics [1][note 1] and CoinDesk [2][note 2].
  1. ^ "Check out hedge fund manager and professor of finance, Patrick Boyle's video summary of exactly what went wrong at SVB. Prof Boyle concludes the SVB "bailout" is not the same as measures taken in the '08 financial crisis."
  2. ^ "The simplest explanation for the U-shape is demand for out-of-the-money (OTM) and in-the-money (ITM) call and put options is typically higher than for at-the-money (ATM) call and put options, as Patrick Boyle and Jesse McDougall wrote in the book 'Trading and Pricing Financial Derivatives.'"

BhamBoi (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pyxus International[edit]

Pyxus International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable article. Ebbedlila (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perma-Pipe[edit]

Perma-Pipe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable with weak references. More like advertisement Ebbedlila (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aspen Santa Fe Ballet[edit]

Aspen Santa Fe Ballet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ballet group that fails WP:GNG TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More