![]() |
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism. The only sources I found using this term are referencing Daina's book. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly sourced article about an open-source project that has had sporadic development. Mindmatrix 20:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Supernatural (season 4). Non-admin closure. Beerest355 Talk 22:37, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A very non-notable television episode. Unlike other Supernatural articles, this one appears to be simply all plot with one review. Beerest355 Talk 22:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Request by subject from VRTS ticket # 2013070510009776. No opinion. LFaraone 22:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete G3 - blatant hoax GiantSnowman 10:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:HOAX. There is no "jmc World Cup Serbia 2014", and I'm pretty sure that CONCACAF is not doing elimination rounds for it, since they're doing them for the actual 2014 World Cup in Brazil. Author has a Facebook page and a YouTube video (the addition of which was reverted by a bot) that seem to follow the same overall theme. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was 'withdrawn by nominator Beerest355 Talk 01:08, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Event with no long-standing coverage. WP:NOTNEWS applies. Beerest355 Talk 20:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any notability for this small insurance office. It has won no awards besides a "2010 Communicator Award", by the "International Academy of Visual Arts" [2] for "interactive excellence" , which seems to be one of the approximately 400 such awards given that single year [3] (besides an similar number in each of 5 other categories) and is consequently totally meaningless. Other things claimed in that section are mere listings or nominations. (One is actually the fact that they nominated their own VP for an award he did not win.)
The bulk of the article is promotional content devoted to the trivial $15,000 or so of charitable contributions it makes annually, including awards named after itself.
All the sources of pure PR, and could hardly be otherwise.
I apologize for wasting the time of editors here at AfD, but my speedy for A7 and G11 was removed. DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate everyone's feedback on this and I can certainly understand the issue with the inclusion of the awards. I'll remove that section shortly. I decided to include it because this was my first new article and the article wizard was stressing independent sources. I googled their name and information about the awards was the most common citation on 3rd party sites. Good learning experience though!
Even without the award section, however, I still believe they fulfill the notability criteria. They have a profile on Bloomberg [1] and have offices in at least 2 countries (they're not a local yokel Main Street insurance shop). So, while they may not have as much published on them as a BUPA, who does a heck of a lot more than international insurance, Clements is still very well-known amongst the people who need that type of specialty insurance.
And speaking anecdotally as a now retired member of the expatriate community, Clements Worldwide is a very well-known name in English-speaking circles. If you ask an expatriate who some insurance providers are, Clements would probably be one of the top 3 listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarnyardWill (talk • contribs) 21:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Sledge Hammer! episodes. As noted in the discussion, while the individual episodes lack notability, they do remain useful search terms, so redirection is appropriate. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These are non-notable Sledge Hammer! episodes, with no third-party sources to establish notability. This show did not last very long, so it doesn't deserve individual episode pages. Beerest355 Talk 18:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn again (WP:NAC). JJ98 (Talk) 18:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft. No third party or out of universe notability. JJ98 (Talk) 17:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 02:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicates much of this list and this [[7]] 50 is an arbitray total. List's infobox also violates WP:OR in its phase section. Northwest Airlines Flight 255 and Viasa Flight 742 crashed after hitting objects soon after takeoff but are said to have happened in different phases of flight. How was this determined?
Delete Duplicate of List of accidents and incidents involving airliners by location, List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft & Category:Lists of aviation accidents and incidents. Has no real value. --JetBlast (talk) 17:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding duplication: Based on the two comparisons you offer, the list proposed for deletion provides significant advances, new information, and sorting abilities not present in the comparisons. List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities provides the following unique contributions: Fatality rate, specific locations with appropriate links, phase of flight, departing or receiving airport links, distance from crash site (for early and late phases of flight).
All of this is organized in a comprehensive and highly sortable table (absent from the two comparisons offered) which further allows for differentiation of accidents/incidents versus attack on the aircraft (further broken out to sort by commercial versus military and types of attack perpetrated on the aircraft). List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities can be sorted by total deaths, crew deaths, passenger deaths, ground fatalities, fatality ratio, incident (airline), aircraft, location, phase of flight, relevant airport codes, distance from impact. None of these features exist in the comparison lists. There are 21 references between the two comparison lists versus 600 references covering each incident with a link to Aviation Safety Network database and in many cases to the original investigation reports.
Accidents/incidents involving commercial aircraft requires that all entries have a dedicated Wikipedia article. This provision alone will never allow the list to be considered comprehensive. Without checking specific cases side by side, there are 111 occurrences in List of aircraft accidents and incidents resulting in at least 50 fatalities without dedicated articles, and therefore missing from accidents/incidents involving commercial aircraft. The list can search by year only.
accidents and disasters by death toll. For the specified scope and criteria, this list is missing 188 occurrences, and has no sorting ability.
There is no violation of Wikipedia:OR. All individual records of incidents are individually cited (which does not exist in either of the abovementioned lists). Figures appearing in tables are nothing more than routine calculations of the cited data. It is for this express reason that figures for standard deviation, correlation, and significance levels were not used. Most importantly, there are no inferences of causal relationships.
Regarding your concern about different phases of flight for Northwest Airlines Flight 255 and Viasa Flight 742 (TOF and ICL respectively), these phases of flight are recorded from the Aviation Safety Network database here and here.
I have no desire to put down or diminish the accomplishments of the comparison lists, that is not my style. However, this AfD has put me in a position where I must explain why I created a newer, expanded, more comprehensive, highly sortable and referenced list. Stylistically and given its scope and criteria, it is not a duplicate of any existing aviation list. --Godot13 (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
<span>
etc to permit sorting of the various columns and 2) the long names of the references. 3) some substantial notes to the table. Some terseness in these elements without losing content might be possible.GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
college player, div III. No referenced claims to accomplishment. In fact, only news report at all (save a bit of local news coverage of games he played in) is a puff piece tangential to his basketball career about a workout program from a local paper. Fails WP:NCOLLATH Gtwfan52 (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I know this man personally, and I even emailed him to check on a few matters before I updated it. Everything on that page is 100% true. Please can you help me to make the page OK by your guys standards, I am not good with computers but I have spent a long time making the edits on this page. Please can you help? Gtwfan52 (talk)actually submitted by User:Basketball Fan 23 Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Y not? 11:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability has not been shown. Article's references are self-published, e.g. Wordpress blogs, Vimeo, Youtube, forums. Previous proposed deletion declined without reason. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He has not played in a single match since the last afd, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT. The coverage he has received is limited to the usual match reports, player profiles, and transfer announcements, which does not amount to significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:GNG as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:01, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because the only club he has made any appearances for do not appear to be professional So he fails WP:NFOOTYSeasider91 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Postpone Deletion until credible source is cited proving the Romanian Liga II as non-professional. Juve10 (talk) 15:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Juve 10, the Wikipedia football portal has a list of professional leagues, only Romanias Liga I is listed there, therefore Liga II is not professional Seasider91 (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seasider91, yes I am fully aware of the list. However, WP:FPL also lists non-professional leagues and the Romanian Liga II is not listed there either. See the talk page for full discussion on this matter Juve10 (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just wait a few month he may or may not turned fully professional in lower leagues. BTW, Juve10, when could you learn the custom in wikipedia? such as using Template:cite news and in-line citation, did the university teach that? Not only on non-professional status, the "article" was built on very poor quality as well as not quite good citation. Matthew_hk tc 10:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Matthew_hk, your comment, aside from the first sentence, has nothing to do with the subject at hand. You clearly have something wrong with you that you need to insult my contributions in every comment you make. Do not insult my college in a sarcastic manner and I never want to see another post from you on my talk page again unless it is related to Wikipedia. For everyone else to know, Matthew_hk has been harassing me for more than 2 years and I would like to know if there is any action that can be taken if I can provide proof? Sorry to post this on a non-related post, but Matthew_hk publicly brought this about in the above discussion. His comments are not related to Laurentiu Branescu in any way, barring the first sentence. Juve10 (talk)
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Dusti*poke* 00:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Musician fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, article has no sources, and AfD unopposed for a long period. We can reasonably treat this as an expired ((prod)). Prodego talk 15:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Kajala appears via Google as a personal name, a type of loan and a pigment sometimes used as a cosmetic. What it seems not to be is a gotra. The only source that this article ever had was the dreadfully unreliable Ram Swarup Joon (itself a deleted article). Fails WP:GNG as a gotra and if someone wants to create an article about the pigment etc then they will need to start over. Sitush (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Red discography. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable EP. The existing refs are less than trivial and I can't see any better refs being found. My search showed none. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TBrandley (T • C • B) 22:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be primarily a how to guide (and Wikipedia is not meant for such things), and focused on a document that exists in a single jurisdiction that does not appear to rise to sufficient notability. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
non notable mid level civil servant Uncletomwood (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No mention about this concept on Google books([13]) or Google Scholar ([14]), no independent references Alæxis¿question? 11:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Revaz Lordkipanidze. (non-admin closure) Nathan2055talk - contribs 16:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No mention about this concept on Google books([15]) or Google Scholar ([16]), no independent references. The author is only interested in Lordkipanidze Revaz and his theories.Alæxis¿question? 11:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Kirishitan. Sandstein 12:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Subject better covered in the article Kirishitan. Add redirect. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Fox Sports (Australia)#Combat sports. postdlf (talk) 01:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about an MMA TV show with no significant independent coverage and no claims of notability. Jakejr (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Twice deleted via AFD and numerous times via G4, however the article was restored and so I am bringing this here for further discussion. This is not a "national team", it is a team made up players from the diaspora from a small island in the Indian Ocean. They appear to have played two friendly games and they have not received any significant coverage. There is no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 09:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment just to say the federation is the NF board In my opinion any so called national team affiliated with this association is not notable. Seasider91 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is drivel, it's basically an essay built on several sourced facts put together with the sole purpose of promoting the POV of the creator. The few relevant and unbiased facts can be added to Africa–China relations, the rest should be deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Iranian Azerbaijanis. The sense of the discussion is that this content fork should be merged together with the parent article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:CFORK. Delete this article. Move or merge necessary/non-redundant parts/reliable citations to the main article Iranian Azerbaijanis. This article has nothing new if you compare it with the main article, except some new photos in the infobox. It can be moved to a new section in main article if necessary. Zyma (talk) 05:45, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Azerbaijanis in Tehran is like The following articles.
Azerbaijanis in tehran Been living in the past (See Tehran Article)→ Tehran finally became the capital of Iran in 1795, when the Qajar king Agha Mohammad Khan was crowned in the city. It remains the capital to this day → one of Iranian Turks Agha Mohammad Khan from Qajar is capital of Iran To date. more of Iranian Azerbaijanis famous people born and live Tehran. Azerbaijanis represent about 25% of the inhabitants. With a population of about 8,300,000 and about 14 million metropolitan area, it is Iran's largest city and urban area, and one of the largest cities in Western Asia. Azerbaijanis can speak persian and Azerbaijanis so News sites to Persian The official languages Covers Azeis in Tehran. Please see * 20 milion Enumeration in the persian Alphabet
Sources for population → 25% Tehran[1] 30.3%[2] – 33%[3][4] of Tehran Province's population.
--SaməkTalk 12:58, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is apparently an airline that has not even started up. There is no apparent evidence of notability. Perhaps after it is in operation and there is reliable independent coverage, then an article might be appropriate. I am One of Many (talk) 05:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just a débutante ball no different from hundreds of others in ever American city. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. LFaraone 00:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article has not been sourced since its creation in May 2010, and I can't find any reliable sources that refer to a Jat clan (gotra) of this name. Fails WP:GNG. Sitush (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 02:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable song that fails WP:NSONGS and has never charted. Koala15 (talk) 00:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CSD declined. No indication of notability. Dewritech (talk) 11:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced to two press releases, a very short review on a site of uncertain notability, and another review on an amateur site run by a group of bloggers. The article was proposed for deletion over a year ago, but the PROD was removed by an editor who wrote "Notability is questionable, but the article actually shows some reviews". (Although it is not in itself a reason for deletion, it is worth mentioning that the article was created by an editor who has since been indefinitely blocked as a spammer, and it does seem likely that this article was written with promotional purpose.) JamesBWatson (talk) 09:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have been trying to improve this article, have added some tags and hyperlinks, and cleaned up the article generally. I don't know where to go from here. The only source of the article is a forum post, and I have tried to find others, but the only other sources are to her own website (which says nothing of her life) and to websites selling her books. A user, who was probably Wilson herself, also added some unverified information to this article earlier this year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan12w (talk • contribs)
The result was keep. No delete !voting activity after two relists. (non-admin closure) Dusti*poke* 03:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article about a person which name is so confusing. There are no reference from any reliable sources and notability problem. I think it's breaks multiple Wikipedia rules. Leela Bratee 08:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. Only two references actually mention him, one is a primary routine source and the other authored by a co-worker. PROD removed by IP who added a large amount of also-unreferenced material. Searching in google is finding many non-independent sources, but no independent ones. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be deleted - it is a work in progress. The finished article will include a significant list of publications and data on Adini's works which are used by educational institutions taken from his overall education, experience and knowledge in the field he has been a pioneer in. MDHwriter(talk) 20:00, 27 June 2013 — Mdhwriter (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
This article should not be deleted. The article is currently missing relevant information on the use of Ami Adini's publications and findings in the field of water clean up and brownfields both for educational purposes and environmental projects both in Israel and in the United States. This article should be labeled as a work in progress and completed. Mggpublishing 03:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC) — Mggpublishing (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was Merge and redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Greece. This is also in line with previous AfD nominations of embassies. Note that Embassy of Greece, Kiev is the only article affected by the decision, since others were not properly nominated (no template etc). Feel free to renominate.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. previous recent AfDs have shown there is no inherent notability to embassies. this article is merely a listing of location and non notable ambassadors.
also nominating:
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found no coverage for this band and the article is unreferenced. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 02:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]