The result was keep. The "delete" !voters miss the point: WP:NOTMIRROR is intended to prevent indiscriminate copy-paste additions of public-domain material. However, in this case the content is perfectly encyclopedic. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is unencyclopedic and has been copied and pasted directly from http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2010/142759.htm. — Kedaditalk 23:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. PROD removed by author. LordPistachio talk 22:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BASIC: no sources available about subject, one article in which the subject was interviewed about a product. Celestra (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am on the cover of the IEEE Spectrum magazine referenced. I was on a special breakout in the Microprocessor Report referenced (because the low power technology discussed in the article is from me). In fact, I was referenced many times in the press while at Transmeta, I was an invited speaker at a number of high profile computer conferences, and I even was on a brief CNN interview. Here are just a few more references on me or my work at Transmeta for your kind consideration. I'll gladly reference every single reference if that helps.
List of references
|
---|
Mit Crusoe gegen Intel. Bayern 5 aktuell, Computermagazin (radio interview), Munich, October 7, 2001 Schöne, geteilte Welt - Hitech: Neue Chancen für alle. Hamburger Abendblatt, p. 22, Hamburg, March 24/25, 2001 Cover story: Crusoe treibt Server und neue All-day-Notebooks. VDI nachrichten, pp. 1 & 39, Düsseldorf, March 23, 2001 [online] Crusoe im Luxusbett. c't Magazine, 26/2000, pp. 84-85, Hannover, December 2000 Cover story: Crusoe's race towards 1W. Nikkei Electronics Magazine, pp. 131-165, Tokyo, March 13, 2000 [online] Crusoe at PC Expo. ASAhi, No. 271, pp. 14-15, Tokyo, August 1, 2000 The innovative Crusoe Microprocessor. ASAhi, No. 269, p. 15, Tokyo, July 1, 2000 Das Projekt Zukunft fordert den Einsatz rund um die Uhr. Computer Channel, San Francisco, August 1, 2000 Top Vendors Adopt Crusoe. Microprocessor Report, San Jose, July 10, 2000 [PDF] Transmeta steigt ins Server-Geschäft ein. Computer Channel, San Francisco, July 5, 2000 Transmeta nimmt Kurs auf den Server-Markt. Computer Channel, San Francisco, July 4, 2000 Transmeta chips to make air travel safer. The Register, London, July 2000 [online] Transmeta inside. Wired Magazine, 8(7):174-186, San Francisco, July 2000 [online] The incredible shrinking computer. On: NY1 (CNN) (TV interview), New York, June 30, 2000 [online] Die Herausforderer. Capital, 13/2000, pp. 71-76, Köln, June 16, 2000 Low power: The new battlegound. Electronic News, San Jose, June 2000 Cover story: Transmeta's magic show. IEEE Spectrum, 37(5):26-33, New York, May 2000 [online] Zu neuen Ufern. c't Magazine, Hannover, January 27, 2000 [online] [shlashdotted] Transmeta Introduces Pentium-like Crusoe Chip. Computer World, Framingham, January 24, 2000 Analysis: Crusoe is a CPU for the road. CNN, Atlanta, January 21, 2000 Transmeta goes Moble Linux. CNET, Hong Kong, January 21, 2000 Transmeta revs up own version of Linux. CNET, Atlanta, January 20, 2000 [online] Crusoe: A CPU for the Road. PC World, San Francisco, January 20, 2000 [list] |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcfl (talk • contribs) 23:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as the article was written by User:Marcfl, who is presumably the subject himself, there is a massive conflict of interest and the article could never be objective. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No sources sinces february, doesn't appears to be relevant either DieBuche (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of social activities at the University of Cambridge. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Insignificant university student club that does not get significant coverage in reliable external sources. Mkativerata (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mainly, there is nothing inherently notable about the fact that a concert happens to occur in Adelaide. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this will be a list difficult to mantain Melaen (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Microgaming. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable poker website fails WP:WEB borderline speedy, prod removed by content creator with no changes Delete Secret account 21:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
unknown notability, Melaen (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
no reference found - unknown notability Melaen (talk) 20:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Beast Wars. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article has no references and no indication that the subject has real-world notability. Was proposed for deletion, but that got opposed by User:DGG who suggested that it was mergable to a lis. But it doesn't seem like this website actually has anything like "List of Transformers plot devices" and I'm not sure making one would be appropriate. Delete would be appropriate. NotARealWord (talk) 20:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Keep nomination withdrawn and nobody advocating deletion (non-admin closure). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
looks like a thing made up Melaen (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
no reference found Melaen (talk) 20:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
scarce evidence of notability Melaen (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. CSD:A7 Nancy talk 15:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
not jet notable, imho Melaen (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Arbitrary and vague inclusion criteria with very few citations. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Concerns about notability and sourcing lead to a consensus to delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
unclear notability Melaen (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article has had no references for a long time. I don't think the subjects of this article could be notable. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the provided refs are insufficient. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article fails real-world notability. While this may of passed for an article back in the ol' days of 2007, I doubt any verifiable sources will be found. The term may be popular, but its really not notable apart from its appearance on Red Dwarf. Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Without RS, delete is the inevitable consensus Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article is about multiple non-notable and unrelated fictional characters. Delete due to lack of sources, notability and proper subject. NotARealWord (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising from a long-gone user. All external links are dead, and he does not seem to meet the notability criteria. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both articles (aside from incorrect formatting of titles per naming conventions), fail WP:NALBUMS; these are mixtapes (not albums, EP or singles) with no chart action, no further information nor sources of any kind. Notability of mixtapes are questionable at best. - eo (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn as promised, per Phil Bridger's comment. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
South African translator of material in Venda, much of which was written by his father. After this prod was contested, it took me two weeks to decide whether this article should be brought here. The notability assertions are clearly sufficient for a keep if they can be referenced, however I am unable to find references that attest to the very existence of the awards the article claims he won. The creator pointed, rightly, that our insistence on reliable sources creates a systemic bias against Africa-related material, however major awards should get reliable coverage even in Africa. Delete, but I'll withdraw if reliable sources can be found. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Consensus favors keeping all articles in question. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, this is an unnotable summer camp. It's tone is promotional, and without the significant coverage in reliable sources, its impossible to rewrite Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Long version: Not enough information provided to prove it is a village, let alone what it is clearly. Per my assertion above, I looked for confirmation that there was, indeed a village named "Ad Arisc" or some version thereof; Ethiopian names for people & places are not transcribed in any standardized fashion. The authorities I use for confirmation fall into one of three groupings: (1) Central Statistical Agency publications; (2) The Local History in Ethiopia database at the Nordic Africa Institute (it used to have far more detailed entries in the past, but it is still useful for verification purposes); & (3) verifiable sources like traveller's reports or memoirs, published articles, & histories. Out of the three, I found "Ad Arisc" (listed as an alternative version of "Adi Arish") only in a single line entry at the Local History in Ethiopia database. None of the reports of the 1994 nor the 2007 national censuses mention it. At this point I concluded this article was borderline until I had a look at the Google map image at the provided latitude & longitude: nothing there. All I could find for 5 miles -- or even 10 kilometers -- in any direction was the typical barren scrubland of northern Tigray, & some dry water courses; no sign of a village or other human habitation. GeoNames is full of ghost & erroneous duplicate entries; I believe this is one more example.
Note: I have provided this much detail as a help to other editors who may need to verify future placenames concerning Ethiopia. llywrch (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Non-notable flashcard freeware. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 16:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - self-promotional article (probably) written by the subject User:Jmlasalvia. Coverage in reliable sources is in the form of identifying LaSalvia for the purposes of attributing quotes to him and are not significantly about LaSalvia. The Wall Street Journal article is about the formation of GOProud and the MetroWeekly article is about the group's appearance at a conservative conference. This is insufficient to establish notability under either WP:N or WP:BLP. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Maximals. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed prod. Notability not clear, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Dinobots. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed prod. Notability not clear, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No notability whatsoever. Is everybody else getting a 404 error on official website? Marcus Qwertyus 16:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems only to exist in order to give Template:Takeoff and landing something to point at for "crash landing"; crash landing itself redirects to emergency landing. The only nonduplicative content concerns deliberately crashing spacecraft for various reasons, which I do not think could be considered "landing" per se. Mangoe (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable regional publication. The only reference provided in the article is a first-hand interview of a library manager; no other sources are available per an online search. Additionally, the primary editor(s) of the article appears to have a conflict of interest with the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn and no !vote for delete. NAC Armbrust Talk Contribs 11:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming good faith on the part of Tony Webster (talk · contribs) and bringing this here. Rationale is "This article doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTE, and a previous AfD discussion identified that it should be revisited." I am neutral. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Courcelles 04:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just don't think this is real notable.... 2 says you, says two 15:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Rome, Georgia#City founding period. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable - probably copy-pasted from another website Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced, possible hoax. Previously prodded a year ago and nothing seems to have changed: "Organisation does not seem to exist, article contains factual errors, which themselves are not worth correcting because they are about other topics (coatrack)". Fails WP:RS at the very least. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nozue is an FMV director. Beyond that, there doesn't seem to be anything to say about him. I can't find any information about the person himself rather than the credits entries. It does not seem to be possible to expand this article with actual biographical information. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks context, POV. "top international tournaments" according to who? Functionally, it is redundant to both List of international ice hockey competitions featuring NHL players and Best-on-best. We don't need three articles on the same concept. Resolute 14:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable fictional character, fails GNG, and no reliable secondary sources comment upon it. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-NotARealWord (talk) 06:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is non-notable. References consist of two defunct websites formerly run by the subject, membership of a mailing list and an entry on a wiki. CSD templates repeatedly removed. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
the work of Jonathan Despres in the futurism field is considerable. He is a notable futurist and a well known debator in this field. More information could be provided if there would be no menace for deleting the article. --Smith2200 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Mystery Science Theater 3000. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there do not appear to be independent reliable sources that offer significant coverage of this group. The group's claim to notability is its supposed role in getting MST3K picked up by Syfy but there's nothing that supports it. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 14:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We found 169 different groups that contained messages about the shows in our sample ... Table 3 ... 20 Top Newsgroups in the Sample ... rec.arts.tv 9,649 ... rec.arts.tv.mst3k.mis 578
((cite web))
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)groups where obsessos of all types get together and exchange information about their favorite TV shows (news:alt.tv.brady-bunch, news:rec.arts.tv.mst3k)
new MST feature flick which just ended its NYC run and should hit the burbs soon check the Internet newsgroup rec.arts.tv.mst3k-84user (talk) 20:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Advertising from a spam username. I didn't see a lot of info anywhere in the refs. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 14:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article needs a good copyedit and could use more refs, but the company made important innovations and won a national prize; clearly notable on those grounds. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, not reliably referenced. Party official (head of arbitration committee) of a party that hovers below 2% in Germany. Lots of Ghits but most of it published by his party. I cannot really say what the status of The European [18] is - looks like an online newspaper but at least Wikipedia hasn't heard of it, and neither have I. Pgallert (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirected to List of X Universe races per nom and WP:BB. Article was completely unreferenced and completely redundant with the "Boron Kingdom" section of the target article. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Too trivial for its own article. Belongs in List of X Universe races Dondegroovily (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge by WP:SNOW. AfD is not for merger proposals. Bearian (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is apparently the same thing as Law of large numbers. No reason for two articles on the same topic. Dondegroovily (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
((R with possibilities))
. --Lambiam 22:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there do not appear to be independent reliable sources that support the notability of this subject. Admittedly it is difficult to screen out false positives but a dozen different searches with different inclusive and exclusive strings turns up nothing. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality issues are so serious that it would be preferable to delete this completely and start again. PhilKnight (talk) 12:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The "delete" side fails to adequately explain how this list's scope is unclear. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very poorly defined and subjective list. What makes a divorce settlement "large"? Money? The circumstances around it? The fact that those involved are celebrities? At what threshold does a settlement go from "largest" to just "really big"? I don't know and this list makes absolutely no attempt to explain. It might be worth listing a few noteworthy cases of abnormally large settlements in an article like Divorce, Alimony, or even an entirely new article, but this list is the wrong way to go about that. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Recently created article, unsourced. Besides some of the surnames listed not originating in the English language (D'Oyly, for example, being French) I ran a search for other similar articles to assess protocol and came across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of surnames. Not sure if this is a recreation? roleplayer 11:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per snow. Killiondude (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Personal essay, bordering on WP:OR. roleplayer 10:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability per WP:ORG. A review of the references reveal that they not only contain misinterpreted citations, but also do not mention Hearts of Fire International Ministries at all. As such, this article lacks significant reliable sources to support notability and inclusion. Cindamuse (talk) 10:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Cindamuse (talk) 10:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW close. Clear hoax, no need to keep this article hanging around any longer. Nancy talk 16:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax article. Entire editing history is from two single purpose users whose only edits have been to this article. All sources are from websites which allow users to anonymously post press releases (easier.com, mynewsdesk.com, dailynet.de), therefore making none of the references reliable. The only "legitimate source" is from esafetychallenge.eu, but this is simply a PDF press release created by yet another anonymous posting website (businesspress24.net). Finally, no such record of anyone by the name Stefanie Gork or Stefanie Ruiz-Herrera in the histories of German Formula Three, British Touring Car Championship, American Le Mans Series, Le Mans Series, 24 Hours of Daytona, 24 Hours of Le Mans, World Touring Car Championship, or the 24 Hours of Nürburgring, several of which the article claims she has won a championship or two in. The entire race history is a fantasy. The359 (Talk) 06:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Biography of a non-notable person. Most online information mirrors article. Article was created before 18 March 2010, and is thus ineligible for a BLP PROD. Shirt58 (talk) 09:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails general requirements. I can't find multiple, non-trivial, independent, reliable references for this artist. Tagged for notability since December 2007. As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Shirt58 (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NOT#STATS. Indiscriminate collection of information, nothing encyclopedic here. All we have is a medal table and a list of medal winners. Not to mention this is merely a junior world championships which, imo, is not notable. Lacks sourcing, is an orphan but for one article. Was prodded but creator de-prodded. User has been previously notified about similar non-notable or WP:CRYSTAL violations, but has chosen not to respond and work co-operatively in this regard. Strange Passerby (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Cookies & Cream (film). Redirect is the consensus I'm interpreting. Userfication can be considered when/if the author requests me (or any other admin) Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. I find a lot of notation for his films but no secondary support for the individual. Awards listed appear to be for his film, not for the individual. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP, insufficient coverage from multiple secondary sources to assert notability. Article borders spam territory. Prod was contested. — ξxplicit 05:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable summer program. TM 04:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Merge options are of course available as editorial decisions, post AFD. -- Cirt (talk) 03:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails notability, that is, how is this different than any other curbside recycling program in the world. Blue Box (container) has been similarly tagged. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Delete is the primary consensus. Merge, as an option, is only an option; given the clear lack of RS, I'm closing this discussion as delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails to explain notability, that is, how is it any different than any other curbside recycling program in the world. Blue Box Recycling System has been similarly tagged. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Hefner (band) . Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Song article with no credible notability claim Dondegroovily (talk) 04:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of the person not established, beyond being the president of a notable organization. About all the article says is that she has that job and what she gets paid to do it. That information should already be given in the article on the organization, The Hunger Project. Wolfview (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. All populated places are notable. No delete !votes standing. (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Stub-quality article about town of questionable notability. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of nothing but OR, no references and no sources. Nakon 04:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Recursive Bayesian estimation. T. Canens (talk) 03:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Content has been moved into Recursive Bayesian estimation, article ready for deletion Dondegroovily (talk) 04:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Non-admin close per WP:SNOW. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Everything on this page has been copied to Austro-Prussian War. This page no longer serves any purpose. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. All the links go to some random web page. I have lived near Kent for a pretty long time and am an avid music fan. I have never heard of this band. Google search doesn't reveal much. UhOhFeeling (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Article moved to new name and refocused to more notable topic. Article expanded appreciably since nomination. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As discussed below, this article has been moved to Bauhaus Project (computing). This move has been approved by the nominator. The goal is to establish notability for the new article, which will include a brief mention of the Axivion Bauhaus Suite.
No assertion of notability, no reliable sources. Flagged for refs for over a year. With the name change to a broader topic and the sources provided, I withdraw the nomination. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 03:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Hadhrat Mawlânâ Khâlid-i Baghdâdî. T. Canens (talk) 03:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Use Hadhrat Mawlânâ Khâlid-i Baghdâdî as your source of information instead. Dondegroovily (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are many available articles written by this journalist, but I can't find any significant coverage of him in RSs. Without any RSs, I think the article fails WP:AUTHOR / WP:BIO. Novaseminary (talk) 03:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 03:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Location is really part of Leeds, Kent, no notability. Dondegroovily (talk) 03:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability. Was part of a group of articles created based on Obama recess appointment announcement. Created by a banned user, but not eligible for WP:CSD#G5. Rd232 talk 16:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete by Orangemike (talk · contribs) at 14:06, 16 September 2010 per G7. NAC Armbrust Talk Contribs 20:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable hobby. 50 users on youtube is not "big". Derild4921☼ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When is it going to be deleted? (I am the author, and am for deleting it to.) Airplanegod (talk) 23:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Band does not meet the minimum requirements for inclusion. Although the article claims that the band has achieved mainstream success, I can't find any reliable sources that confirm this. Pichpich (talk) 01:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability for this online competition. PROD removed without adding any reliable sources. Salih (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The film exists, and stars well-known actors. The consensus is that this makes it notable. As an aside, as MichaelQSchmidt points out, there is a risk of systemic bias here. Many Indian newspapers and magazines do not have any online archives before the 2000s. With this being Tisca Chopra's debut, and a film starring Ajay Devgan, I would be surprised if offline resources were not available if a search was made. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that it exists let alone that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Robot Chicken episodes. T. Canens (talk) 03:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that episode article is notable enough, the article currently fails WP:GNG. JJ98 (Talk) 00:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability :)
Ladsgroupبحث 00:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The consensus is to delete. Should suitable sources which meet WP:RS be found, then the article can be recreated -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A contested proposed deletion, this article does not show why this manga is notable according to WP:N or WP:BK. A CSE search primarily brings up scanlation sites, but no information on licensors. Malkinann (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In spite of the large amount of text in this article, this article still does not meet the WP:WEB criteria: no evidence of actual articles about the site in WP:RS -- mere mentions in passing do not count. In spite of the apparently impressive list of references, most are either self-cites, mentions in passing, not from WP:RS, or irrelevant to the subject of the article. The material referring to the notability or otherwise of its creators is also irrelevant, since notability is not inheritable. The Anome (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not a single properly published source, fails WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 07:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No Sources given, and I have been unable to find any confirmation of this. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:BALL Forty two 10:10, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete"' per WP:NOT and WP:OR WuhWuzDat 13:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable middle school (claimed awards are not distinguishing even if true). Per standard practice, should be deleted and redirected to town or district. Bongomatic 14:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See CIBA cited as one of the best by Education Department from the Journal Inquirer, "The Blue Ribbon award is given only to schools that reach the top 10 percent of their state's testing scores ... It is considered the highest honor a school can achieve." That this school has received the highest honor an American school can receive demonstrates that it is notable. Cunard (talk) 06:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I placed a prod tag on this article due to lack of independent sources. The prod tag was removed and no independent sources were added, so here we are. The current sourcing consists of some wiki pages and a mailing list post, and a paper in Farmacia Hospitalaria - but the paper does not actually mention FreeMedForms at all - it is about a freely available data set that FreeMedForms makes use of. I've had a look and haven't found any better sources. Given the absence of reliable sourcing, this article does not satisfy the General notability guideline. MrOllie (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Note that if IP disruption resumes this can be brought to WP:RFPP or another appropriate venue. T. Canens (talk) 03:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD - PROD reason was "This is a strange one. It was moved to user space In February 2010 by someone who has since been indef blocked for page move vandalism, and I've just moved it back to main space as I see no reason for it having been there (The user whose space it was in, User:Ganerer appears inactive and to have had nothing to do with it). Since then it has been heavily edited by a number of IP editors, including some who are kids who have a known history of making unreferenced and unsupportable additions to pages related to SE Asia (and usually having them deleted). It is completely unreferenced, and one of the IPs even claimed "NO SOURCES NEEDED FOR THIS ARTICLE, IT IS NOT A MAIN ARTICLE" in an edit summary. The whole thing is a mess - I'm sure a good article could be written, but I wouldn't trust a word of what has been written here, and I think deleting it and starting afresh with proper sources is probably the only way to go." -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article with no useful sources that fails WP:GNG for fictional characters. The usual plan for such non-notable characters is to redirect/merge to a minor characters list but none appears to exist. Should probably be redirected to CT ScanX-ray computed tomography if deleted. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 18:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to assert notability of this particular product. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 00:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Closing early per WP:SNOW. The subject meets WP:NSPORT and this article is about him. Any ambiguity can be dealt with through the normal editing process. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I nominate this article for deletion bcuz there were 2 players with that name (William "Bill" Owen) in Manchester United, and this article does not stat which one its referred to, as both players could have been FW and the link on that article does not work. – HonorTheKing (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here 3 links, first one to StretfordEnd which claim his name is unknown, while mufcinfo claims both were William, [49] [50] [51] So now, after writing this, I am my self not sure who is the right Bill or who is unknown. -- HonorTheKing (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]