The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On a Guantanamo prisoner with no coverage at all. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP1E. Tagged for Notability since Feb 2011. The Citations used are primary sources (Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#Reliability_of_US_military_summary_reports). DBigXray 23:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —HueSatLum 00:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Originally speedied by RaviC claiming of WP:COI, contested by Recorderz who was reverted as sock. Speedied declined by Magog the Ogre who PROD'd with the rational "This article currently looks like a POV-pushing nightmare" and prod-2 by Vibhijain with "The article has many controversial statements which desperately need sources". Prod contested by Shrigley who "believe a neutral article on this topic can exist". So here we are. KTC (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've listed this under corporation though it's partially about both Betten and his company Lost Art. Neither seem notable per either WP:BIO or WP:CORP. Did some searching and while celebs might have bought some of his goods, nobody seems to have talked about it. Most Google search results are just back to Betten's corp site or his own profiles on various social networking. Other results aren't related. Dismas|(talk) 21:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Disney XD. Closed per RadioFan opening a merge discussion (non-admin closure) Nathan2055talk - contribs 17:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No references, article is basically content that should be merged with Disney XD Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant self-promotion. Article created by the founder of the company. Claims to be a "school" (which is why speedy was declined), but is just another company doing English classes in Spain. Even the article says there are several others. No evidence of notability, and one of millions of similar companies worldwide.
The result was merge to List of fictional people of the Three Kingdoms. Possibly List of people of the Three Kingdoms as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Requested by 220.255.1.85 for being a duplication of an existing page, an older version of List of people of the Three Kingdoms dated February 2011. Benjitheijneb (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I personally do not see any reason why this list must exist, but I am unwilling to base my own uncertainty as a reason for its deletion; I can imagine a use for a list of characters in this novel - which comprises neither the whole of the fictional characters list nor the whole of the historical personnages list; thus, I am unsure whether this qualifies for WP:Notability or WP:PLOT. Granted, the article is nevertheless a carbon copy of the old version of List of people of the Three Kingdoms, but I am also uncertain whether to delete it on that grounds, as such an act may be demolishing a house before it's built. Thus, I will reserve comment until explanatory Wikipedia guidelines are presented which resolves these issues. Benjitheijneb (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Team has not played in the FA Cup or FA Vase. In addition to this, the club has not played at a high enough level. The Leicestershire Senior League has never officially been at level 10 (step 6). The consensus is currently level 10 as it is the level at which teams compete at the FA Cup. This has never been the case for the LSL. I think the previous keep decision was wrong as although it was de facto below the Midland Alliance, it was still officially a step 7 league like the Kent County League (pre-Kent Invicta League) or the Essex Olympian League is currently. There was still a 2 league gap between the LSL and the MA in reality. Del♉sion23 (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see how this article might meet WP:ORG, nor even attempt to assert that it meets that notability criteria. — Fly by Night (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article is almost a direct copy of the web site. Most notable is that it talks about holding the events in the past - is it still active?Peter Rehse (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted WP:CSD#G7 by TexasAndroid. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not speedy-able because an assertion of importance ("award-winning") is made. However I can't find appropriate sources; fails WP:GNG. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 19:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable amateur youth football team. Haven't played in the national cup competition and so fail WP:FOOTYN, otherwise fails WP:GNG. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 19:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 02:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. No assertion of notability. No external refs only its own web-site Velella Velella Talk 16:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Indian Idol 5. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 02:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indian singing-reality-show contestant. Stood 4th. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 11:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
This article fails per WP:N, looking at sources this appears to be a one shot manga which in 2011 an announcement was made that it would be turned into an anime, no recent news that I could find since then. Deprodded by an IP. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, the couple of sentences in this page don't really mean anything, as far as I can tell. "Assembly language programming in scripting languages"? What is that supposed to mean? Anyway, I had never heard of this, which led me to do a quick Google search, and there doesn't seem to be anything on Google about this either. At least under this name. Dtm1234 (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this theater actress to evidence notability under WP:GNG, although one source did give one sentence of coverage to a single performance in a particular play. [7] Has had a couple voice-over roles, but doesn't seem to have attracted more than an unreliable database listing or two as a result of that work. Additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e deckertalk 16:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →Bmusician 02:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OR article. Title invented by Wikipedia. Not a single source used in the article uses the term "Demographic-economic paradox". Yes, there is a negative correlation between income and fertility/population growth - so what? There are all kinds of correlations between various variables. VolunteerMarek 13:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
However, a Google search of books, while turning up some Wikipedia compilations, also turned up some independent sources, pre-dating the WP article.
It appears the phrase was coined by Herwig Birg, perhaps in 1995. However, the original phrase was "Demo-economic paradox". A search in Google for that term yields hits other than the WP article.
It appears the article needs better referencing, not deletion.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep WP:SK#1 nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced with no indications of notability; the author's name is a redlink. Specs112 t c 15:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Withdrawing nomination. Specs112 t c 18:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Buffalo Public Schools#PS 3 D’Youville Porter Campus School. (non-admin closure) MacMedtalkstalk 15:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing particularly special about this school, and it's an elementary school; we usually don't keep those. Specs112 t c 15:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus.
Okay, this is a very poor-quality discussion animated mostly by personal sentiments instead of Wikipedia policies and practice. I'm discounting all the opinions, no matter how "strong" or "speedy", that are based on editors' personal opinions about the article's current contents or on other weak arguments such as WP:OTHERSTUFF, or no arguments at all. Notably, the argument that this should be deleted as an attack page is preposterous (there's a rather evident distinction between making an attack and describing derogatory slogans made up by others), as is the argument for keeping it just because a laudatory slogan also has an article. I'm also discounting all opinions that make allegations of misconduct (such as hounding) against others: AfD is not a dispute resolution forum.
On that basis, the only opinions I'm taking into consideration are those by TheSpecialUser, Rsrikanth05 and Ansumang (keep), and Future Perfect at Sunrise, CodeTheorist, Averroist, Shrigley and Samar (delete). With respect to these opinions, we do not have a clear consensus to delete, so I'm closing the discussion as "no consensus".
How to proceed now? I recommend to start a talk page discussion or a formal WP:RfC about whether this should be merged to Anti-Pakistan sentiment, as has been variously suggested. If that RfC is inconclusive, the article may be renominated for deletion (in the hope that the second discussion will be less of a mess). Sandstein 08:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This article very aptly fits a dictionary definition of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:POV editing, created in response to another article Pakistan Zindabad. The subject of the article is a derogatory attack term which is inappropriate and has no place here, by any stretch. The article, if not outright deleted, should preferably be merged into Anti-Pakistan sentiment. I cannot see any WP:AGF involved in the creation of this article. There are heaps of slogans, and last time I checked, Wikipedia didn't have articles on attack slogans like "Death to America", "Death to India" etc. Mar4d (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would hope a similar comment by you when someone will comment about Pakistani editors. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Oleola (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced, and there do not seem to be any references available. Google search turns up nothing relevant. Dtm1234 (talk) 13:42, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted. WP:CSD#G4: The content is substantially the same as that of the article deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Lord Ozai (Avatar: The Last Airbender) Sandstein 20:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All plot summary. The sole out-of-universe information is already in other articles. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 13:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources can be use in any articles no matter how much it is used. Ozai is the main villian of Avatar: The Last Airbender. Light2Shadow (talk) 01:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable per WP:NHOCKEY Львівське (говорити) 13:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Nouniquenames (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:NALBUMS Nouniquenames (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:GNG, no significant coverage YSSYguy (talk) 11:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While this person clearly existed and is covered briefly in the source added, along with a few images available, there is no assertion of notability. Due to the non-English nature of the subject, finding sources can be difficult, but I do not believe the sources are in a depth for this subject to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MUSBIO. I am willing to be convinced otherwise. KTC (talk) 08:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 22:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. Claim that his company was on the Inc. magazine list of top 500 companies is cited to an interview given my Milstein, but cannot be verified by a search of Inc.'s site. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
promotional & propagandistic article for minor public orfficial DGG ( talk ) 07:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Not an easy close, obviously, but (similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton Kutcher on Twitter) the stronger arguments are with the "delete" opinions. Once someone or something gets sufficiently notable (like Justin Bieber), many subaspects, minutiae and trivia of his work or life get excessive attention, mainly from the more popular and less reliable media (tabloids and the like), but also from more serious, reliable sources. While the latter do more to establish notability, the fact remains that this moves into WP:NOTDIARY territory, and WP:IINFO (and verges on WP:COATRACK as "This article is about both Bieber as a topic on Twitter and Bieber's use of Twitter.", mixing two related but separate topics, including things like how Charlie Sheen made an error when he wanted to post something to Justin Bieber). Note that obviously a short section on Twitter (and similar social media) in the Justin Bieber article is perfectly appropriate. Fram (talk) 08:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This is not a notable topic. Notability is not inherited and twitter accounts like youtube videos or email address or stretch of highway or sites with many visitors simply do not carry on the notability of the artwork, city, highway, or person they are associated with. All the sources are about Justin Bieber not about his account itself, this could be merged into one sentence in his article and this article deleted as it is not notable at all. LuciferWildCat (talk) 07:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Large table, click "show" to view --->
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
huge list of sources (hatted to keep it readable) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Some content moved to Talk:Justin Bieber on Twitter. --George Ho (talk) 00:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While we're at it, let's get rid of Lady Gaga on Twitter too. It's even worse. Rizla (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Advert for a pr guy written by his pr company. Lead sentance says he is a senior partner for a red linked company so no notability from that. Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is a local interest puff piece, press release and passing mentions. A search finds lots when he says something as a spokesman but nothing substantial about him. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A business that has failed to garner much notice. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Specialist Engineering Contractors Group. At least until size considerations require a spinoff. Sandstein 07:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This BLP is about the former wife of Henry Hill, about whom Goodfellas was filmed. Henry Hill is undoubtedly notable, but notability is not inherited. There is undoubtedly some coverage about her, but I am unconvinced that she is notable independently of her ex-husband. I am also concerned about the BLP implications of having an article about the wife of a mobster. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 15:03, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Indian Idol 5. Sandstein 07:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indian singing-reality-show contestant. Stood 6th. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Also claims to be an upcoming actress of films that haven't started their principal photography. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indian singing-reality-show contestant. Stood 5th. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING, no secondary sources. Just a promo piece. The article's author appears to be a single-purpose account. TuckerResearch (talk) 01:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Knocked Jared Combs the fuck out.
Non-notable - competes in non-notable events Peter Rehse (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about this. At first reading I thought it would be easy to find sources, but the only one I can find which passes WP:GNG is this one, and I'm not sure that one source is enough. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 23:09, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The consensus is weak here, but with the lack of anyone (apart from the nominator) arguing for deletion I can't see any other closure other than keep being possible here, with the article having already been relisted 3 times. Davewild (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject does not appear to be notable according to WP:BIO but has merely received glancing mentions in several sources due to typical work as a publicist. —Eustress talk 04:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass WP:N Hapmin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a company that lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to satisfy notability in general or that specific to companies. All I was able to find was minor mentions in conjunction with work from Top Cow. Whpq (talk) 15:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. As noted, a (potentially) controversial topic in and of itself is not valid reason for deletion. The nomination rationale has appears to have been countered as well. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing in here not already covered in Al-Ahbash article. Sourcing is lousy as well Darkness Shines (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Siolim. Consensus is that this does not merit a separate article, but to preserve attribution have redirected to Siolim, where the merge has already taken place. Davewild (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Topic is non-notable. Some part has been merged into Siolim#Chapels_in_Siolim The Discoverer (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can and do think that some travel guides would probably be able to establish notability of some churches in Siolim. I am in fact virtually certain of it. However, I do not see that the creator of this page has made any effort to establish the notability of the individual buildings or even of the topic itself as per WP:NOTABILITY. John Carter (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pizzimenti appears to be an avid and even knowledgeable amateur "space-ologist" -- a collector of space memorabilia and stories -- but I find no valid argument to call him notable. What press coverage I can find about him appears to be in the form of announcements of shows or lectures he is presenting, but no substantial independent coverage. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation of the title as a redirect to the 1906 siege The Bushranger One ping only 23:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Simply put the article is in violation of three Wiki guidelines. The main is Wikipedia:Verifiability. The article has no sources to back-up the claims in it. Second. It does not fulfill the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability. Except for one sentence The Siege of Maarat al-Numaan was part of the 2011–2012 Syrian uprising. the article has nothing to say to the Wikipedia readers. Third, given no sources are provided for the article it could also be considered in violation of Wikipedia:No original research. I think that says it all. Considering the event, if it even happened, was not followed in the mainstream media, if someone manages to get a source on it, it will still be in violation of the Notability act, thus in that case it would be more preferable to merge what few sentences there are to the Timeline article instead of leaving a fork article like this. Thank you! EkoGraf (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I checked if major material was removed as you say Anarchangel. It seems all of what was removed was unsourced info which the removing editor had all right to delete. Wikipedia is based on Verifibility. EkoGraf (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject isn't sourced nor is it notable Casprings (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Creating deletion discussion for Material heresy
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 05:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Missing any notable reference links. Also an orphan and dead-end page, the latter though can be fixed. It's also a possible hoax - to my knowledge nobody by the name of Evan Tolkkinen exists. If he did, his ability to consistently knock down 60-yard field goals would probably show up somewhere in my College Football fantasy draft guide. Also, this article was nominated for Speedy Deletion under G3 three times, all removed by the creator of the article. He has been suitably warned. Regards, RomeEonBmbo 02:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]