< 16 January 18 January >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greenbelt (video game)[edit]

Greenbelt (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find video game sources: "Greenbelt (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article created by developer and added to by its "artist". Even this, which is cited to in the article, indicates that the game is barely releasable let alone notable. Bbb23 (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Serebro. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the article was moved to "Dasha Shashina" while this discussion was in progress. Both titles have been redirected to Serebro. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daria Shashina[edit]

Daria Shashina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains no information not included in Serebro. Launchballer 23:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a good reason for this--the other members are or were with the group for years, but this person just joined and was previously unknown. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway more input needed from other users. Preferably those with knowledge of the group I guess.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per results of related AfDs and the fact that if these are deletable they need to be discussed as an entire group The Bushranger One ping only 03:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of breweries in Massachusetts[edit]

List of breweries in Massachusetts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed WP:PROD. This is basically a linkspam farm. There are almost no notable entries in this list. Wikipedia is not a directory. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck part of my !vote above. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per results of related AfDs and the fact that if these are deletable they need to be discussed as an entire group The Bushranger One ping only 03:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of breweries in Oklahoma[edit]

List of breweries in Oklahoma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed WP:PROD. This is basically a linkspam farm. There are almost no notable entries in this list. Wikipedia is not a directory. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck part of my !vote above. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination has been countered with sources presented in the discussion and those added to the article after the nomination for deletion. Additionally, the delete !vote by User:Spanneraol is not policy- or guideline-based, nor is the keep !vote by User:Morriswa. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 02:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still We Believe: The Boston Red Sox Movie[edit]

Still We Believe: The Boston Red Sox Movie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. All I found on Google as far as WP:RS go is this, and nothing else, suggesting a lack of significant coverage. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 23:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G7 - author requested (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 13:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Street of the Four Winds[edit]

The Street of the Four Winds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't think this short story is notable. It should be part of the article on the collection The King in Yellow Op47 (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the page is that it is far too short, but so is my description of Demoiselle d'Ys. I suggest you only delete on the grounds of inadequate description, not on the grounds that the story is not one of the weird ones. It is poetically macabre and has significant French writers behind it such as Gautier and Nodier. Several critics have singled it out as a fine one from the latter half of the book. The whole book is noteworthy and at present Wikipedia only takes the Lovecraft reader's point of view. Whitespeck (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS - How does one delete a page? My description of Charles Nodier's La Fee aux Miettes using just the symbolism doesn't work and I think that this page should be deleted, but I don't know how to do this. I put it up. Whitespeck (talk) 23:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If you are the creator and only substantial contributor to an article, you can request that it be speedily deleted by placing a ((db-author)) tag in the first line, preferably including an explanatory note in the edit summary. If you think that someone else might want to rescue the article (especially if they have made non-trivial changes already), you can follow the proposed deletion process instead. Hqb (talk) 09:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added descriptions to the stories on the main article and removed the link to this story. I would be interested in comments, criticisms, etc. Whitespeck (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Sood[edit]

Kunal Sood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article relies on primary sources or non notable sources. Article seems to promote subject than an encyclopedic content. Itsalleasy (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not sure why you say this? The article is covered with reliable sources. The man addressed to General Assembly of the UN and is a global health expert cited worldwide, all covered in references. --BiH (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The man addressed to General Assembly of the UN (official UN document: [1]) and is a global expert on sustainable development cited worldwide (mentions in serveral books: [2] ; mentioned in various papers: [3]). Recently, he curated TEDxUNPlaza event, hosted by the UN. All of this is covered in references. In my opinion, nominating the article for deletion was an act of bad intention (not to mention is was not done properly by the nominator, so I did not take it seriously). --BiH (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Most of the keep !votes that are not socks appear to be confusing this person with Mark Burnett (executive producer) of Survivor, who is undoubtedly notable. Stifle (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Burnett (producer)[edit]

Mark Burnett (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Director is non-notable thus far; has only directed one film (not to be confused with Sleeper (2009 film)), which also appears not to be notable so far. Local newspaper source helpfully notes local boy starting out on his career. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He is a producer who just so happenes to also have director and writer credits. He has more notability than many articles i have seen on wiki. If you dont know who he is then you are not quallified to review on this topic.Makro (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP He is well know in the industry and has worked on many TV sets.90.214.105.156 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Katie Jarvis Danny Lloyd Klinton Spilsbury Carrie Henn (actress) Robert Arkins. All these are as equal in their natability and they all have articles. If they quallify then so does Mark Burnett (producer).Makro (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote. See also WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The budget on IMDB states £10,000 not £1,000.Makro (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It said £1,000 when Korny left their comment, but it does not matter. It would not matter if some anonymous IMDB user entered _£10 trillon_ as the budget--IMDB is not a reliable source and so is worthless for notability discussions. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Has an IMDB page. Has references. Just because you havent heard of hime doesnt mean he isn't notable. @user:korny. Many films have had low budgets, you cant judge on that one factor.Js46358 (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that there have been some notable films with low budgets, but I thought the budget of this one shed some light on the type of project he's been involved with so far. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. Korny O'Near (talk) 04:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Notability is made clear. Has an IMDB page that proves his notability. DSmith2014 (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed that this article came through AfC, and I looked up the approving editor with the idea of offering some advice. But it was actually the article creator who moved it from AfC to mainspace. For any of its faults, AfC is voluntary, so I don't think it can be blamed for this one. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Notablity is confirmed. As user:makro satates, there are many other bio pages that contain less information that stay on wikipedia.Paddyallen (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's great to see so many people creating accounts just to express support for keeping this article! And all with such similar writing styles, too... I hope you all continue to contribute to Wikipedia. For this particular argument, though, see WP:OTHERSTUFF, as noted above. Korny O'Near (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mallikarjun Bande[edit]

Mallikarjun Bande (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know he is deceased but WP:BLP1E applies here. No significant coverage, and nothing about anything other than his death. GiantSnowman 20:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons being IGP to whom the PSI was reporting has been transferred from Gulbarga due to public outrage and demand from the deceased's wife. At this moment yes there are no enough points to put on his life , but going forward as and when the enquiry gets started new information may come out.

Also if required page name can be renamed to "Death of mallikarjun bande". But i personally feel that page should not be deleted. [[User:|Prajwalkumarmn]] (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bande was a brave cop who died in the fierce encounter with Munna, a sharp shooter and active criminal with alleged nexus with underworld. Also, bande was credited for his crack down on rowdy sheeters for which it is reported that he was transferred to Crime Branch. His death has now sparked intense Socio-political and security debate in Karnataka. Government of Karnataka has even ordered for a thorough investigation into his death by the CID. Who Knows?? the outcome might act as a new milestone for future police reforms in India.-- ~ Irrigator talk 05:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Family Kingdom Amusement Park. Stifle (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Splashes Oceanfront Water Park[edit]

Splashes Oceanfront Water Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a single worthwhile ref supports this article. Own website and paid for advertising seems to be the total extent of it. Nothing robust or reliable except to confirm that it exists and that local residents care about the Swash. 100% advertising  Velella  Velella Talk   19:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boston bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics[edit]

Boston bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL. 2024 Olympic bids don't go in until next summer. The page contains nothing but purely speculative material about a bid that may not even make it as far as the application stage. See similar AFDs for Guadalajara, Paris, Budapest, Saint Petersburg. Kahastok talk 17:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pawn & Co (bar)[edit]

Pawn & Co (bar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like advertised page just to promote the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Mr RD 17:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Guseinov[edit]

Arthur Guseinov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No point in letting this rumble on any more. Pretty clear that neither artist is notable (at the moment). Salted. Black Kite (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mobonix[edit]

Mobonix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unless I'm missing something, this artist seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO, so I recommend deletion here. Note that there is another artist with the same name, which confuses things somewhat. I'm not convinced that the other is notable though either. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and WP:SALT: I have discussed this in ANI where Wikipedia is not a place for trademark disputes where Wikipedia has no part to play in. Having made aware of the lack of notability, I am concerned that the article may be recreated after deletion, taking the dispute back to square one. If any Mobonix becomes notable then any user can request one via WP:RA. --Marianian(talk) 17:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Neither version is notable and Wikipedia is not a battleground. I get the sense that this article is some sort of trophy, and Wikipedia is not that either. Recreation will only mean more disruption. Dlohcierekim 17:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have the article full-protected at the moment to stamp out the edit-war among competing versions between the two claimants to this name; see article-history for them. Feel free to propose content and RS of either one (preferably on article talkpage) if you think one is notable. I am not taking a position on the notability of either one at this time. DMacks (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification There are two competing versions for this article, and neither article is supported by significant coverage and neither subject asserts meeting WP:MUSIC. Both article creators assert some sort of legal right to the name, and are contending over the two competing versions. Please see the talk page and the discussion at AN/I for further details. Dlohcierekim 18:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
comment It's apparent to me that this article exists for promotional purposes for one of the claimants, as he has removed the afd tag with an edit summary about not "confusing the public" and asserting his trademark. This is a single purpose account named for one of the claimants. Once again, the trademark issue is not our concern as editors. It is an off-wiki dispute,and Wikipedia is not a battleground. This claimant version is a usurpation of the original article. Wikipedia is not here to promote his trademark. Dlohcierekim 16:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheat'ah Engineering[edit]

Cheat'ah Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). There is no mention of this company in Google Books or News, nor at HighBeam, Questia, Gale, or the Macmillan Reference USA or Gale Business Insights business directories. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Aside from a few 1970s catalogs and newspaper ads for sale, this firm doesn't seem to exist. — Brianhe (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crosley Gracie[edit]

Crosley Gracie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable as martial artist or MMA fighter. His connection to the Gracie name does not infer notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete'he fought in a major mma organization which was Pride. He was also a pancrease champ. I tend not like Gracie propoganda, but he is accomplished in his field. CrazyAces489 (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meets MMA note as per Have fought at least three (3) professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see WP:MMATIER); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NMMA#Mixed_martial_arts and Pride is top tier [5]CrazyAces489 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm not seeing 3 top tier fights. Yes, PRIDE was top tier but not Pancrase. Also, I don't see any evidence supporting your claim he was a Pancrase champion. Papaursa (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
the significance says 3 professional fights for a top tier mma organization OR Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization. So he makes it, barely, but he makes it. Pancrease is a second tier so that helps but is not a sole qualifier. [6].CrazyAces489 (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the hour is late and I must not be thinking clearly. He has only 2 top tier fights and never fought for a top tier title, so how does he meet WP:NMMA? Please tell me what I'm missing. Papaursa (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem. According to: [7]

Mixed martial artists are presumed notable if they Have fought at least three (3) professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see WP:MMATIER); or Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization. Gosh while reading this, I saw you're correct. He has 2 top tier fights for an MMA organization. I thought I saw three fights. I guess I would still put keep since K-1 Kickboxing is considered to be a top kickboxing organization in the world. Wikipedia is giving credence to k-1 for kickboxing. [8] . So 2 fights in a tier 1 organization and a k-1 event would work for me. CrazyAces489 (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

add, i did make a mistake. He wasn't a pancrease champ. You were right with Gracie. I still think he is borderline notable. The 2 fights and the k-1 fight work for me. He did beat Kiuma in pancrease, while Kiuma was still holding one of the belts. Apparently Kiuma was the welterweight and middleweight champ at the same time. Kiuma lost the middleweight title a fight previous to fighting gracie, he later lost to gracie and in the next fight he defended his welterweight title. Overall, I think Gracie is a notable, barely. CrazyAces489 (talk) 07:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I found no evidence he ever kickboxed, certainly not enough to meet WP:KICK. Are you confusing his appearance at a Hero's MMA event (which was K-1's attempt to promote MMA) with a K-1 kickboxing event? Are you also aware that, according to the weights given at Sherdog, Gracie had a 27 pound advantage over Kiuma Kunioku (180 vs. 153)? That's why Gracie is listed as a light heavyweight and Kunioku as a welterweight--I'd say that makes his victory less impressive. Add in the fact that the article has no significant independent coverage of Gracie and I'll stick with my delete since he doesn't appear to meet any notability criteria. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this. Papaursa (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanation. I was going by this [9]. I saw k-1 and wasn't aware of hero's significance. That with the weight advantage in pancrease makes a difference as well. My keep can be changed to a veary weak keep. CrazyAces489 (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleigh Grimshaw[edit]

Ashleigh Grimshaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - no top tier fights. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bao Li Gao[edit]

Bao Li Gao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced non-notable MMA fighter. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Sola[edit]

Steve Sola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability about the subject is contested. Lacks verification of alleged works with celebrities in media outlets (e.g. NBC.com). Most links with the exception of a Google book that claims Steve Sola's studio charted on Billboard lead to Wikipedia itself and can't be used as references. In my view, the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines and appears to be yet another attempt at carpet-bombing with meaningless references and hoping that something sticks. Ubot16 (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BioScale Inc.[edit]

BioScale Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporate spam, reads like a press release. Probable conflict of interest. wp:g11 was declined (though I would have deleted on that basis, honestly). -- Y not? 16:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

King David's Sling[edit]

King David's Sling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable thought experiment on the possibility of superluminal communication. The author of this article was able to get an article published (which he uses as the source for this Wikipedia article) in the American Journal of Modern Physics, a publication of the Science Publishing Group, which has been identified as a known predatory publisher. The concept itself is completely without merit, but even as a hoax, it is not notable in that it has received no other coverage than the author's own publication of this article in several venues. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is not whether it is a thought experiment, whether the results are right or wrong, whether it is scientifically coherent or not. The issue is WP:Fringe and WP:Notability, the experiment does not have extensive WP:third-party sources talking about it, and for good reason, the author displays a complete non understanding of physics.Martin451 16:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A single (or several) published paper(s) are not enough for a wikipedia article, even if they appear in Physical Review Letters or Nature. What is needed is many other sources talking about the idea in a meaningful way. Wikipedia is not here to publish wp:original research, or promote individual scientific papers.Martin451 16:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then it is clear you people have work to do.--Glenm101 (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What work would that be? The burden of proof is upon the author. If you can show that this paper has received significant attention -- that it has been extensively cited or itself the subject of independent articles -- then there might be a chance of keeping the article. Otherwise, not. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Still not notable, but at least not a copyright violation. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Open Access is not CC-BY-SA or compatible. It states only about "distribution by SciencePG", not about distribution by third parties.`a5b (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to me that SPG leaves the copyright ownership with the original author, with SPG having a license to publish from the author. The distinction is moot however; we either delete because of copyvio or because of notability. In either case, we delete. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, all that should be needed to fix potential copyright issues is quotation marks and attribution. Quoting portions (in this case: a single line) of abstracts is textbook fair use. Kolbasz (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 19:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Umesh Kamat[edit]

Umesh Kamat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography with sources that merely mention the subject. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NACTOR. - MrX 15:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Latvia–Malaysia relations[edit]

Latvia–Malaysia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. There does not seem anything to this relationship except one meeting of foreign ministers. There is a lot of want to co operate more and more tourism statements but no evidence of actual trade, tourism or agreements. Most of the sources supplied are the foreign ministry website which can be considered a primary source. LibStar (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

most of the sources are primary. There is a lack of third party sources. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
and most of the sources are primary. LibStar (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've also searched Latvia's biggest newspaper and it seems to cover mainly sporting results in Malaysia [12]. LibStar (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
you have provided no reason why this article is notable. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
there is no significant trade and no sources to establish it. LibStar (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beaver contest[edit]

Beaver contest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about a contest or initiative. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT. - MrX 15:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misha Cirkunov[edit]

Misha Cirkunov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Combs[edit]

Jared Combs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - did manage one top tier fight but that was over a year ago and a loss. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Crane[edit]

Alberto Crane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter or martial artist. Managed two top tier fights several years ago but both were losses. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Devane[edit]

Robert Devane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Looks like some success at amateur level but that really doesn't count towards notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buugeng[edit]

Buugeng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable prop. This was categorized under martial arts equipment which makes it even less notable. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete under WP:CSD#G4 as it was recently deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikkah Shalit. Number 57 22:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Micah Shalit[edit]

Micah Shalit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTMEMORIAL, WP:NOTNEWS. Too soon to tell whether deserves article. TheLongTone (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheetah (riding toy)[edit]

Cheetah (riding toy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Phillips (producer)[edit]

Mark Phillips (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find much about him. His biggest claim to "fame" is that he has his own production company and that he produced My Ghost Story. He has other production credits, apparently, but being a producer, in and of itself, is not sufficiently notable to justify an article. If others find reliable sources (the article has no sources but IMDb) demonstrating notability, great. Bbb23 (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Underwood International College[edit]

Underwood International College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising and corporate promo based on corporate sources. Author keeps restoring info The Banner talk 23:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Metfem2d[edit]

Metfem2d (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. - MrX 18:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halina (film)[edit]

Halina (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a non-notable film. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NFILM. - MrX 17:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Centennial F.C.[edit]

Centennial F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Did prod, was removed with 'as a pioneering gteam,. perhaps it is notable -- would need a discussion.' Has been tagged for notability for several years, so perhaps it can be established one way or another in this discussion. Boleyn (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What would document notability?--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mighty Liberators Drum and Bugles Corps[edit]

Mighty Liberators Drum and Bugles Corps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ridiculous tag-bombing apart, this article, created in 2006, still fails to meet the most elementary criteria for inclusion under WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:BAND. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Veljo Pecan[edit]

Veljo Pecan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, not notable, probably fictional person. Jingiby (talk) 12:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Allegra[edit]

Sarah Allegra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears to be too soon for Wikipedia to have an article about this photographer. Whilst her work has been featured in a number of publications, very little has been written about her, and nothing at all in reliable sources. She may well meet the appropriate notability criteria one day, but that day isn't today. Please see the article's talkpage for an ongoing discussion of sources. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Google search indicates that this is a relatively widely used term that has also been used in books about this subculture, e.g. [14]. On a notability basis, there might be a case for an article. However, the article makes claims about it being a psychological state and its supposed physiological basis. Such content requires sources that meet the verifiability requirements of WP:MEDRS, which are not present in the article currently. From a verifiability point of view, the consensus to delete as emerging from this discussion has therefore a valid basis in policy. This article may be userfied if anybody wants to try to improve the sourcing, which would be required before recreating the article.  Sandstein  10:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subspace (BDSM)[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Subspace (BDSM) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has never had reliable sources. Survived an AFD more than three years ago with the claim that actual sources exist, and yet it still lacks anything like good source. I don't care if some editors seem to think it is some real and significant thing, it needs multiple reliable sources giving nontrivial coverage to have an article here. More than enough time to improve it has been given. Right now there's nothing here worth saving, and, worse than that, looks like it's in full on woo territory and should not remain per WP:FRINGE DreamGuy (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are dozens, if not hundreds of references for this topic. Every reliable reference book on BDSM makes reference to subspace. My time constraints limit my ability to add such references. Suggested sources include: Screw The Roses, Give Me The Thorns; So You Want To Be Kinky; So You Want To Be Kinkier; SM 101; The New Bottoming Book; The New Topping Book; Different Loving; etc.

The references exist and are readily available. The only issue is someone finding the time to add them.

The suggestion that this article is woo stuff is nonsense. It's the kind of reaction that comes up when people attempt to address articles on topics for which they lack adequate knowledge to properly understand them. Anyone who has solid knowledge of alternative sexuality is aware of the reality of subspace. Anyone qualified to review this article objectively would add citations, rather than suggest deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CDNRopemaster (talk • contribs) 17:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as now clearly meeting WP:GNG. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sutton High Street[edit]

Sutton High Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not finding published secondary sources to indicate that this rather ordinary suburban high street is notable for a standalone article. Charles (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a major filming hub in south London.--Launchballer 10:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see what the problem is - it's all sourced - but reworked into a list format and all 'via's removed. Better?--Launchballer 23:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was nothing but a huge mess hence the comment?, Anyway it's much better .... I'd even say it's readable!.. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is actually worse because Wikipedia should be mostly written in prose. It has to go anyway per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTRAVEL. It is quite unacceptable cruft.--Charles (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
History section now written and added in. I am pleased with it (even if I say so myself!), but may yet polish it a little and/or add a bit to it.User:A P Monblat —Preceding undated comment added 22:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have put three citations at the end of the section but for verification we need to know which parts of the text are supported by which source. Otherwise it is synthesis. You may find WP:Citing sources helpful.--Charles (talk) 09:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have aligned the citations with the specific parts of the text that they support. Hope this is OK now.--A P Monblat (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good work.--Charles (talk) 09:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Boyd (ice hockey)[edit]

Matt Boyd (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. Played his career in NCAA Div III and the low minors. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Olson[edit]

Brett Olson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Anderson (ice hockey)[edit]

Dallas Anderson (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Baird[edit]

Jason Baird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, as per nom, fails NHOCKEY and GNG, I can find only coverage regarding a landscaping accident and his death. ÞórrÓðinnTýr Eh? 02:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Fistric[edit]

Boris Fistric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wade Fennig[edit]

Wade Fennig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC) Ravenswing 09:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Tkachuk[edit]

Grant Tkachuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Loewen[edit]

Jamie Loewen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:40, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Dudas[edit]

Jesse Dudas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garry Gulash[edit]

Garry Gulash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Law (ice hockey)[edit]

Bob Law (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Smith (ice hockey)[edit]

Scott Smith (ice hockey) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Paul Martin[edit]

Jean-Paul Martin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator. Ravenswing 09:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Chaytors[edit]

Ryan Chaytors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator. Ravenswing 09:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  14:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Jean[edit]

Kyle Jean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator. Ravenswing 09:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Shulo[edit]

Logan Shulo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestler, as of yet (see WP:CRYSTAL as they've only been signed to a development deal. Not enough sources, so also a WP:BLP issue ES&L 09:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, that one reference doesn't even link to his profile, just the front page. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ashraf Haidari[edit]

Ashraf Haidari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Ashraf Haidari is the Deputy Chief of Mission (Minister Counselor) of the Embassy of Afghanistan in New Delhi, India. From June 2011 to July 2012". vanity bio speedy deleted as spam in January 2012. The ((notability)) tag has been on the article since April 2013, and I tend to agree that the onus must be on the author, a WP:SPA and possible WP:COI account, to indicate that this deputy chief of mission is a notable position and would qualify for a WP article. He has penned a number of articles, including a letter to the NYT, and the SPA has been keen to include them all in the biography. But I see no sources available that could be cited to demonstrate his notability.  Ohc ¡digame! 07:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Plaxton. GedUK  13:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plaxton Pronto[edit]

Plaxton Pronto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very small article with limited content, Other than 3 images I've found nothing to say the bus even exists, So I suggest a redirect to Plaxton as such. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 06:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The bus does appear to exist but there seems to be no significant information on it other than that it is a variant of the Mercedes Sprinter, and what little exists appears on a few commercial hire web sites. Acabashi (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Shadows (e-book)[edit]

The Shadows (e-book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New low point in article accepted from AfC

self-published eBook without any pretense to notability except 3 local newspaper articles, which ,as this case shows, are indiscriminate in what they cover on local authors. DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. GedUK  13:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Celibacy syndrome[edit]

Celibacy syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page created from two news hits - not reliable sources. Essentailly a neologism, or if not then a term that has not been taken up generally and appeared in secondary sources. Any relevant material can be merged to celibacy or sex life. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Oh good, so the Japanese media (all these stories seem to stem from the same set of factoids/research (i.e. primary source/study)) have reified research as "celibacy syndrome" and we accept that as legitimate and notable then? Do we have an authoritative peer-reviewed secondary source that supports this? A google search got zero/zilch hits for me for the English term. To me, psychological issues such as problems with sex/intimacy sit squarely in medicine/psychology, hence my lack of accepting newspapers as reliable secondary sources on this (even if one of them is the Guardian...) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It doesn't have to be legitimate, it just has to be notable to gain an article; and it definitely is notable. There is no requirement for a "peer-reviewed" secondary source, and you know that. How can you claim you got zero hits for the English term, when I clearly provided all of those sources just from searching for the English term? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I meant Google scholar. There is requirement if we consider it within the realms of psychology/medicine. Depends on how you look at it really. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I don't know whether this is legitimate or not, but it did receive a huge amount of press coverage in October and November of last year, and it popped up again in this just a couple of days ago. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • An editorial, but one that sums up my point that these surveys are about a Japanese demographics issue. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Not wanting to have sex is not a thing"? Citation needed. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Celibacy is a thing. Invented neuroses beyond that, i.e. the product of newspaper headline writers and Dr. Phil specials, are not things. Tarc (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Moments or minutes before Bluerasberry commented here (mentioning the syndrome aspect among other things), I was also thinking about the "is a syndrome" text, along with the Wikilink, being problematic; this is because it makes celibacy syndrome seem like it is a mental/psychological disorder. The Syndrome article at least, however, currently states: "In recent decades, the term has been used outside medicine to refer to a combination of phenomena seen in association." That wording could be improved, including per WP:Dated. But either way, if we are going to call celibacy syndrome a syndrome, it needs to be clear that we don't mean "syndrome" in a medical sense; this should be clear no matter where the material in this article resides. Flyer22 (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm definitely one of the people who didn't, and still does not, understand why this topic needs a Wikipedia article; in that WP:Edit summary, I stated, "Tweaks. The authoritative language, for example, is not good. However, this article should be re-redirected...as far as I'm concerned; not notable enough to be a standalone entry. The less stubs, the better, per WP:Content fork." So when Sulfurboy stated above "I'm in favor of a merge as proposed by Cas Liber, as this page has been recommended for a merge at least twice before.," he may have been referring to me as the other person who proposed a merge. Though, in that WP:Edit summary, I suggested a redirect, it is also clear that I was suggesting that the material be merged somewhere. I'm still in favor of a merge in this case. Flyer22 (talk) 16:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See this is where I'd disagree on status - it is so tied up in intimate psychology that we can't afford to dismiss it as outside the medical realm. Furthermore as it stands it is not a syndrome, only a statistic that some populations are engaging in relationships and sexual activity at a lower rate....and I am loth to support the media reifying this - rather than be some new "thing" there are numerous entities in psychiatry this could be ...social anxiety, generalised anxiety disorder, avoidant personality or just any number of subclinical intrapsychic issues. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to UCL Institute of Archaeology.  Sandstein  10:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Papers from the Institute of Archaeology[edit]

Papers from the Institute of Archaeology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journal. This is the in-house journal of the UCL Institute of Archaeology, making it a local publication; there are no sources with in-depth coverage in the article and nothing obvious in google web or google scholar. Merge and redirect to UCL Institute of Archaeology also a possibility. PROD declined based on abstracting, which doesn't appear to be policy based. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Historic divisions of Ireland[edit]

Historic divisions of Ireland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopelessly incomplete article, partly nonsense (like the counties "Galway Town" and "Kings Offaly") The Banner talk 01:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  13:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neighbourhood Toy Stores of Canada[edit]

Neighbourhood Toy Stores of Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. The sources are either mere announcement or the groups own publications. Was (properly) deleted under G11 when entered into mainspace. Was tried again in AfC, and accepted there. DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to LifeWay Christian Resources. GedUK  13:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Berean Christian Stores[edit]

Berean Christian Stores (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggest merge and redirect to the article about the company that acquired it, LifeWay Christian Resources. There are no references in the article. The only references I find discuss the purchase and not the company itself. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Shepherd[edit]

The Lost Shepherd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film produced by a non-notable person and shown, once, at a film festival of dubious notability. Available sources include a screening schedule for said festival, something written by the directory, IMDB and a mention on "Who's Dated Who".

TL;DR: unable to find reliable sources covering this. If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must delete. Ironholds (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skydiver Mach II[edit]

Skydiver Mach II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains only one verifiable source of information and lacks WP:Notability. BlitzGreg (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More