The result was delete. SoWhy 12:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Looks to be largely the product of original research, and though it has a lot of citations, all of them that I checked named the subject in passing (and often were Primary sources, which per WP:BASIC do not contribute to notability), or didn't name the subject at all. In many cases, the citations are nothing more than external links to the home pages of the named entities, and in no way document the subject's association with them or otherwise documenting the claims made in the text in the least. The level of personal detail (such as linking to his infant daughter's birth-announcement webpage, that doesn't even name the subject) and seemingly irrelevant celebrity photographs makes me think it might be a WP:PLUG/vanity page. Agricolae (talk) 23:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be an individual who is simply a local councillor who ran for a regional mayoralty and failed to retain their deposit in that election. The articles in the page are not articles which confer individual notability on to the subject. The subject is incidental to those articles. As such the subject fails the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Sport and politics (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced since creation. WP:BEFORE finds usual download, tracklisting, dicogs, eBay, Amazon, etc. Some recent articles about lead singer's recovery from stroke are only independent WP:RS coverage. No indication of chart success, airplay, or gold certification. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete under A7. Hut 8.5 20:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Made a page about himself, without any references. Does not appear to be notable. El cid, el campeador (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 07:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Notability. Lack of. TheLongTone (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus after two relistings. (non-admin closure) feminist 00:59, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Marginal example of a not-yet-notable composer/producer; assertions and claimsseem to be in conflict with WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS, since he does not appear to be notable in his own right Orange Mike | Talk 20:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn, no comments in favor of deletion. . Beeblebrox (talk) 17:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested proposed deletion. Reason for proposal is that Wikipedia is not a directory, reason for removal is that this is "standard content for airlines" however I don't believe it is the case that we have a seperate article listing every single place an airline flies to. Hubs? Sure. Whole other countries? Makes sense. Every little town in Alaska that this regional provider flies to? Not so much. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:CORP. created by a one edit User with booking.com and tripadvisor as sources it looks suspiciously like an advert. Gnews comes up with same named hotel in Puerto Rico which may be notable LibStar (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 17:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability for this book. The only reference has a void URL and can't be checked. Searches yield nothing of any merit. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 16:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Glory Days (Little Mix album). Page protection can be requested at WP:RFPP iff required. SoWhy 12:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Probably fails WP:NSONGS, was redirected by Livelikemusic last week under that rationale. A few blogs (but no major publications) covered this on its release as a promotional single. It did, however, chart (at number 61 in the UK; and in two other countries). Jc86035 (talk) Use ((re|Jc86035))
to reply to me 15:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Spindrift (band). Delete !votes do not preclude the option of redirecting, so that's what I'm going to do. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable member of some local bands (the only one with its own article, Spindrift, itself seems to be of questionable notability). The references currently in the article don't include anything resembling a reliable source, and even more striking, none of them even mention Zachary Hansen. I spent some time looking for sources on my own and couldn't find anything that could help to satisfy WP:GNG. Also, the article creator shares the same name as the subject's former web company, pointing to the likelihood of a conflict of interest. Camerafiend (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Relevant references are peripheral mentions or blogs, often written by the organisation itself or by its staff. Nothing here convinces me about notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hip-hop artist with coverage only in passing mention, blogs and otherwise non-rs and article sourced almost entirely to soundcloud and YouTube. In fact, the most significant coverage I can find of Tracy is in reference to him pissing off a former KKK leader. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Since an AFD has been opened for the other page, I'll let what happens there happen. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable album by non-notable musician. When the only half-reasonable reference I can find is a Huffpo piece, it should probably be deleted as A9, but that's already been contested, hence why we're here. Primefac (talk) 12:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Update I've found and added the sister album The Glass Ceiling Project to the nomination as it is the same artist, same issues exactly. Ping previous voters User:Primefac, Guy Macon,talk, and CSD tagger Godric please confirm your vote for the other page. Legacypac (talk) 12:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I've nom'd the sister page for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Glass_Ceiling_Project Guy Macon talk talk, and CSD tagger Godric Legacypac (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I do not think the career as reported here shows notability as either WP:PROF or WP:CREATIVE. I declined a speedy, because the recordings and book are a claim to some significance. DGG ( talk ) 10:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTSTATS. Nothing can be said about him; there is a short article at [17] but it pretty much states he is a youth debutant in Extraklasa, gives few quotes and stats/bio details (born in, joined Football team X in 200XX, etc.). During this training he had a small accident, and he was nervous during his debut game. This clearly fails WP:GNG. Before someone argues that he passes (or not) Wikipedia:Notability (sports), let me quote from that policy: "Q: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline? A: No, the subject must still eventually meet the general notability guideline. ". So unless we can show he meets GNG, well, NOSTATS etc. Meeting NSPORTS or not is about as irrelevant as whether he has a Polish Wikipedia article (which incidentally he does not have, too). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
200+ google hits, nothing in news, no significant awards/descriptions of works, WP:TOOSOON at best - currently fails WP:CREATIVE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 12:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
A WP:SPA The links listed for proof of verification are broken and not of a celebrity standard for wikipedia. Seems like they are using this page for promotional use not facts on how they have changed the industry from a celebrity stand point. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. 24.9.98.30 (talk) 1:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Merge proposals etc. may be evaluated at talk page. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 07:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
To quote the person who Proded this article- "No evidence that this accident is noteworthy for a stand-alone article, helicopter crashes are not rare particularly military operated ones. Really needs to be the cause of death of a wiki notable person or another notable feature to have an article." This crash is tragic but not notable. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 03:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
There is some coverage here (which is why I declined the A7 speedy request) but other than that, I cannot find any substantial coverage about her (just some passing mentions in lists of physicians). Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. SoWhy 08:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I knew her personally and will be updating the article further with sources included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgvtornado (talk • contribs) 21:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)The result was redirect to Wikimedia Foundation. Redirected content may be accessed through the page history. (non-admin closure) feminist 00:59, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
This really doesn't seem like a notable topic on its own, especially when articles for the Wikimedia Foundation and all its reader-facing projects exist. Half of the article is about language codes. Jc86035 (talk) Use ((re|Jc86035))
to reply to me 07:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 11:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I have hard trouble seeing how this person passes WP:MUSICBIO, through maybe someone more versed in Swedish than me can review the sources better. What I see seems to be mostly niche/in passing. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 11:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Subject does not receive reliable secondary coverage, nor are his awards noteworthy enough for an article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SoWhy 11:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
this article relies on stringing factoids to somehow imply a notable topic. Whilst no formal relations is not a reason for deletion, the interactions are tangential. for example:
The result was delete. SoWhy 11:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete: This article was likely WP:TOOSOON in 2012, and my WP:BEFORE did not find any further progression in the subject's career. The external links are multiple copies of the identical press release from 2012. (One is now a dead link.) The young lady has a YouTube channel, with 33 subscribers. Scottyoak2 (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion (A7). (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Clearly non-notable 16-year-old, only his own social media as links Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:38, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Gary Moore. Selective mergers can be performed by accessing the page history. (non-admin closure) feminist 05:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Not sufficiently notable on his own as per WP:GNG. Being the son of guitarist doesn't cut it either - as per WP:NOTINHERITED. Whilst there are media reports of him playing at his fathers funeral, this material does not support his notability, and seems best placed in the Gary Moore article, where there is already a mention of these facts. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Jack moore posted a video on Facebook of him playing the guitar which received nearly 500 thousand views, and nearly 40k likes and almost 8k shares. His facebook page grew from 11k likes to 20k likes as a result. He then posted a video of him playing Albatross which received nealy 100k views showing Jack Moore has a very large fan base. Even Thin Lizzy are sharing his posts.
The performance at the funeral is not what is making Jack a notable guitarist. Its the hundreds of thousands of views and shares of his songs on social media. https://www.facebook.com/jackmooremusicuk/videos/1483364181714797/ --JodyCollinsBAhons (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cold, Cold Heart (band). (non-admin closure) feminist 05:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Fails GNG, sources point to only blogs and press releases, and fails NMUSICIAN. ToThAc (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to La Salle College#Sports. A merger may be performed by accessing the page history. (non-admin closure) feminist 01:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Nominating despite a school/sports related article. WP:SOAPBOX, WP:PEACOCK , this sounds like a pamphlet in current shape. Has WP:PRIMARY and WP:NPOV issues and an external video link Devopam (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G5: creation by a blocked user in violation of block or ban Yunshui 雲水 13:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
advertisement for collage Daniel0Wellby sch (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Insufficient information. Hiwilms (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sexual assault of migrants from Latin America to the United States. Most !voters agreed that this can be merged now that a suitable merge target exists. SoWhy 10:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Article recreated after PROD deletion a month or two back. Sources are not reliable enough to confirm this as a notable concept. The first three are YouTube videos from vloggers, not clips from reliable sources. The next is Washington Post, but it's a blog, and the mention of the "rape tree" in it is a Tea Party activist's claim that "rape trees" exist. The blog quotes the activist's claim about rape trees and then follows up with a statement about "confirmed reports of migrant women’s rape by border “coyotes"," making it look like the rape trees claim is similarly confirmed - but it is not, at least not in the article.
The final source is a claim by a local sheriff alleging that trees marked by undergarments and condoms are commonly found along coyote routes and are intended as warnings to migrant women by coyotes. He states, "we discovered that those are rape trees," but from whom? There is no indication of where his information came from, and a local sheriff testifying about illegal immigration issues is about as far from a neutral, independent source as one can get.
Please don't take this AfD wrong; I'm not by any means disputing that women are sexually assaulted by coyotes taking advantage of their situation. I am disputing specifically and exclusively the concept of "rape trees" as a notable concept that should be covered in a stand-alone article in Wikipedia. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Article does not fufill requirements of WP:NFootball or WP:GANG Wolfmalfoy (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Article does not fufill requirements of [[WP:NFootball] or WP:GANG. The subject of the article is an underaged athlete who has yet to sign a professional contract or play in a professional or senior national team match. The article was created in response to recent press coverage of the subject's performance in a youth tournament and there has not been widely spread coverage of the subject outside of this. The article is therefore inappropriate at this time.Wolfmalfoy (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedily deleted as WP:CSD#G5 (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Smooth) by K6ka.Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
This has been speedy deleted six times under the titles Fly Fierra and Fly fierra (both titles are now salted). The basic argument remains the same: he's just not notable as a musician and producer. The only coverage (actually simple instances of his name being mentioned) in reliable sources stems not from his work as an artist but from a dumb prank he pulled with a couple of friends. Pichpich (talk) 04:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Live/archive album that relies entirely on band web pages. It lacks significant secondary sources. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Am I the only one who thinks that this page should be merged into a redirect? Sure, he's a main character in one of the most iconic animated series, but the page hardly covers any out-of-universe notability, and a majority of sections or content is unsourced, save for the Creation and Development section. And after doing research I could hardly find any official sources or news coverages on the character that are noteworthy enough to warrant an article, or any at all for that matter; when typing the character's name (or "chris family guy") into Google News, most of the coverages deal with people who just happen to have the same name as him and have no affiliation with Family Guy whatsoever. The closest sources to real-word perspective of the character I could find were the coverages concerning him dating American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift in the episode "Chris Has Got a Date, Date, Date, Date, Date", but considering that it was only a one-time thing that didn't attract much impact, I don't find the information that sufficient to consider the character iconic, despite his series being such. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if an article about a fictional character doesn't have a Reception, Controversy, Criticism, or Cultural impact section, then does that automatically mean it should be merged into a redirect? SoapSoapWhatIsSoap (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Obvious hoax (see talk page). Was marked for speedy deletion as a hoax, but User:Uanfala has twice removed the tag, so here we are. Calton | Talk 02:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Nothing here seems to satisfy WP:SOLDIER. He commanded the Alcatraz Citadel, but that article barely mentions him and an Alcatraz Military Timeline has just two minor entries about him. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep For some people there will never be much info available, but what we have is valuable, a notable figure and position on a prominent institution, should be kept.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Even those arguing for merging essentially believe the content is worth preserving. At this point of time, there seems to be no consensus for such a merge but if this changes, it can be discussed at the talk pages. SoWhy 10:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
TheLongTone (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Oops, Twinkle rather ran away with me here. IMO this could be speedied as duplicating the topic ((Education about the holocaust]], created by the autor of this article. I'm dubious about their Genocide education as well....TheLongTone (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi TheLongTone, Thanks for your concern. Could you please specify why you think Education about the holocaust and The Holocaust in curricula are duplicates? Curricula is a "key component" of Education about the Holocaust, and that is articulated in the article. These articles were created as part of a project that uses Wikipedia's and UNESCO's open license/open access policies to create and improve articles. If you have any doubts as to the legitimacy of these articles, Genocide education included, please consult the cited publications. If you have any questions about the project, please consult John Cummings. Thank you. (A.mart82)
Hi, can I request nothing is 'speedied'. I don't agree they are the same subject but I don't pretend to have enough in depth knowledge of the subject to know whether it is suitable to merge this article into another or to leave as it is. --John Cummings (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Operation Red Wings. SoWhy 10:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:1E. -- Irn (talk) 01:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. SoWhy 10:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The article in question provides very little context or history of the convention itself (per WP:N(E)) and no references or citations outside of external links. The homepage to said event doesn't list much information and the infomrmation I have found only directs back to another user-edited encyclopedia. article on Fanlore Snickers2686 (talk) 04:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
After reviewing the sources and past discussions, I concur this does not pass WP:GNG/WP:CORP/WP:NMEDIA. It is a podcast that has generated little coverage of itself, except niche star wars fan sites and local media. They do get mention in passing every now and then, but I don't see what makes them significant (notable). I don't see any source discussing their significance or impact on the wider world, or even in Star Wars fandom. Yes, they are likely one of the more notable Star Wars podcasts (I am guessing, since I haven't found a source that says that...), but unless this is stated by a reliable, non-niche, non-local source, it is not enough. PS. My university doesn't seem to have access to HighBeam, but neither of those articles seem sufficient (passing mention/local coverage) to be sufficient to argue this podcast has received significant coverage by other media, IMHO. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Having disregarded the opinion of Matthewwells55, who has been indeffed as a sock. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't see how this comes near to meeting WP:CORP. The gallery does what all art galleries do – have shows, try to sell works of art, promote themselves and sometimes the artists, etc. The article was created by a user named Jsginfo, and appears to have been an attempt at promotion from the day it was started. We don't allow promotion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)