The Great American Novel (sometimes abbreviated as GAN) is a canonical novel that is thought to embody the essence of America, generally written by an American and dealing in some way with the question of America's national character. The term was coined by John William De Forest in an 1868 essay. Although De Forest mentioned Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852) by Harriet Beecher Stowe as a possible contender, he noted that the Great American Novel had most likely not been written yet. Writer Henry James used the shortened term, GAN, in 1880.
Practically, many academics use the term to refer to a small number of books that have historically been the nexus of discussion, including Moby-Dick (1851), Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), and The Great Gatsby (1925). However, there is no consensus on which novel, or novels, merits the title of Great American Novel.
The idea has evolved and continued into the modern age, although America's national development has led to it being dismissed by some as no longer applicable. The early 1900s saw the idea considered as "extinct as the dodo". It did slowly resurge from the 1920s onwards. Clyde Brion Davis and Philip Roth both wrote novels about the Great American Novel, titled as such—the latter in the 1970s, a time of prosperity for the concept.
Since the concept's creation an assortment of novels have been declared the Great American Novel, ranging from The Last of the Mohicans (1826), to Invisible Man (1952). Interpretations of the Great American Novel has also arisen. Writers and academics have commented upon the term's pragmatics, the different types of Great American Novels and the idea's relation to race and gender. Equivalents to the Great American Novel, such as the Great American painting and poem, have been proposed.
While literary fiction was written and published in British America as early as the 17th century, it was not until a distinct United States identity developed in the 18th century that works considered American literature first appeared. The U.S. identity as a nation was reflected alongside the development of its literature. By the mid-century, the idea of American literature exceeding its European counterparts began to take shape. According to Grant Shreve of JSTOR Daily, "[t]he dream of a unifying national book had been around since the earliest days of the Republic, but the Great American Novel didn't fully gel as a concept until the end of the Civil War". Lawrence Buell saw the 1840s as the start of novels being written that would later be considered the Great American Novel.
The term Great American Novel originated in an 1868 essay by American Civil War novelist John William De Forest. De Forest saw it serving as a "tableau" of American society; Daniel Pierce Thompson said it had to be distinctly American. De Forest criticized James Fenimore Cooper's The Last of the Mohicans (1826) and noted that it did not deserve to be called the Great American Novel. He expressed his admiration for the works of Washington Irving and Nathaniel Hawthorne, but also claimed that they were not fit to be given the title. He ultimately concluded that the Great American Novel had yet to be written. In 1880, writer Henry James simplified the term with the initialism "GAN".
The term soon became popular, its ubiquity considered a cliché and disparaged by literary critics. Buell stated that the concept was seen as a part of a larger national, cultural and political consolidation. According to Shreve, as the concept grew, criteria for the Great American Novel arose:
George Knox's 1969 entry in American Quarterly claimed that by the turn of the century many critics were reluctant to invoke the idea of the Great American Novel, due to possible ridicule. This continued into the middle-twentieth century, when academies began to dismiss the Great American Novel as a "naively amateurish age-of-realism pipe dream". Bernard F. Rogers noted in 1974 that "The "GAN" really belongs to the nineteenth century, not the twentieth".
Writers such as William Dean Howells and Mark Twain were equally blasé. Frank Norris proclaimed in 1901 that "The GAN is either as extinct as the Dodo or as far in the future as the practical aeroplane..the thing to be looked for is not the Great American Novelist, but the Great Novelist who shall also be an American". Edith Wharton complained, in 1927, that the Great American Novel concept held a narrow view and was "always about Main Street, geographically, socially, and intellectually". She also felt that claims of the Great American Novel were made too often; once ironically inventing the Great American-Novel-of-the-Month. At this time, it also grew to become associated with masculine values.
Despite this critical disregard, many writers, according to Maxine Hong Kingston, wanted to create the next Great American Novel; Upton Sinclair and Sinclair Lewis both sought to create the Great American Novel with The Jungle (1906) and Babbit (1924), respectively. “Templates” and “recipes” for the Great American Novel were created in the hopes of helping writers. In 1938, Clyde Brion Davis released The Great American Novel, an ironic, fictional, exploration of the concept. Rogers said that Kurt Vonnegut's "entire career might be characterised as an attempt to produce something like "the GAN", but of its own time".
A similar satirical novel, to Davis', about the concept was released by Philip Roth, also called The Great American Novel, in 1973. The 1970s saw a general resurgence of the concept, with the New York Times using the phrase the most in their history, a total of 71 times.[a] Tom Perrin, in the 2018 book American Literature in Transition, 1970–1980, speculated that this revival was due to the "decade's considerable anxieties". The concept was again aligned with masculinity and according to Perrin sought to "neturalize the tension" between it, "individualism" and "the social upheavals that challenged them".
In the 21st century, the concept has taken on a new more expanded form; moving past, primarily, the concern of scholars and towards a more populist attitude.[b] Shreve called it "catnip for a listicle-obsessed internet"; its relevance and achievability is frequently debated. Adam Kirsch claimed in 2013 that "Hardly anyone talks about the Great American Novel without a tincture of irony these days". Although, Kirsch conceded that books such as Roth's American Pastoral (1997) indicate that writers are still interested in creating the Great American Novel. Commenting upon the Great American Novel's place in the 21st century, Stephens Shapiro said that "Maybe the GAN is a theme that rises in interest when the existing world system is amidst transformation, as America's greatness of all kinds swiftly fades away." When asked in a 2004 interview if the Great American Novel could be written, Norman Mailer—who had long been interested in the idea—said it could not, for America had become too developed of a nation. Tony Tulathimutte similarly dismissed it as "a comforting romantic myth, which wrongly assumes that commonality is more significant than individuality".
According to British writer Martin Amis, immigrants or "non-Americans" were critical in the evolution of the Great American Novel. He pointed to the fact that many Great American Novel authors were foreign-born or of immigrant backgrounds, such as Vladimir Nabokov. According to Lucy Scholes, in an article for BBC Culture, the evolution of the Great American Novel was largely influenced by "the various waves of immigration that have lapped at America's shore".
Annika Barranti Klein said in a Book Riot article that "The glaring issue with De Forest's concept is its unbearable whiteness". Rigoberto González noted that "The GAN considers the big lives of those people American literature has marginalized". Kirsch claimed that Great American Novel candidates often tried to "bridge the racial divide". Commenting upon the idea's racial aspects and presence in popular conscious, Hugh Kenner wrote in a 1953 issue of Perspective that:
The lad who was going to produce 'The Great American Novel' as soon as he had gotten his mind around his adolescent experience is part of the folklore of the 'twenties, and the prevalence of this myth documents the awareness of the young American of thirty years ago that the consciousness of his race remained uncreated.
Perrin, Andrew Hoberek and Barbara Probst Solomon all noted that the 70s saw Jews become involved with the idea. Perrin said it was a boom decade for, what Hoberek, called the "Jewish GAN". Solomon was by 1972 sick of "nice Jewish sons who are writing the GAN". Aaron Latham, in a 1971 article, highlighted Roth and Mailer as Jews who wanted to the write the next GJN and GAN, respectively.
The Great American Novel's relation to masculinity was seen as a problem by female writers. Gertrude Stein once lamented that, as a lesbian Jewish woman, she would be unable to compose the Great American Novel. Joyce Carol Oates similarly felt that "a woman could write it, but then it wouldn't be the GAN". Viet Thanh Nguyen said that "[o]ne of the unspoken silences of the Great American Novel is the assumption that it can only be written by white men". Laura Miller wrote, in a Salon article, that "The presumption and the belligerence embodied in this ideal have put off many American women writers". She also noted that many characters in Great American Novel candidates are male: "the notion that a female figure might serve the same purpose undermines the very concept of the Great American Novel". Although British analyst Faye Hammill noted that Gentlemen Prefer Blondes by Anita Loos, was one of the few that 'doesn't stink'. Emily Temple of Literary Hub suggested that if the protagonist of Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar (1963) were male it would likely be considered more seriously as a Great American Novel contender.
There are several different interpretations of what makes a Great American Novel. Some say that it depicts a diverse group facing issues representative of "epoch-defining public events or crises." John Scalzi felt that for a novel to be the Great American Novel it had to be ubiquitous, notable and analyze America through a moral context. De Forest, similarly saw the Great American Novel as having to capture the "essence" of America, its quality irrelevant.
Writer A.M. Homes said that the specific usage of great should not be a statement of quality, but rather, one of expanse; within this context, she felt that she had written a Great American Novel with May We Be Forgiven (2012). Norris shared similar sentiments, saying that "[i]t" all depends upon what you mean by Great, what you mean by American". He thought the musings on what did or did not qualify as "Great" or as "American" showcased patriotic insecurity. Mohsin Hamid wrote that "[t]he problem is in the phrase itself. 'Great' and 'Novel' are fine enough. But 'the' is needlessly exclusionary, and 'American' is unfortunately parochial. The whole, capitalized, seems to speak to deep and abiding insecurity, perhaps a colonial legacy".
Commentators have said that the concept is exclusively American in nature. Journalist John Walsh offered a national equal in the form of Russian writer Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace (1869); Buell felt that Australia was the only country to replicate America's search.[c] Scholes said that the Great American Novel has always been thought of adjacent to European literature. David Vann was of the belief that they had to be "anti-American". Rogers felt that it doesn't need to have American protagonists or be set in America and shouldn't espouse patriotism or nationalism.
Buell identifies multiple types of Great American Novels. First is one who is subject to mysticism and stands the test of time. The second is "the romance of the divide", which imagines national rifts in the "form of a family history and/or heterosexual love affair"—race often plays a role. Thirdly, one that encapsulates the American Dream and see its protagonist rise from obscurity. Fourthly, novels which are composed of a diverse cast of characters "imagined as social microcosms or vanguards" and who are placed with events and crises that serve to "constitute an image of 'democratic' promise or dysfunction". Buell also said speculative science fiction may be the basis for a possible fifth archetype.
Kasia Boddy wrote that, "[s]ince its initial formulation", the concept "has always been more about inspiration than achievement; the very fact that it has been attempted but remains 'unwritten' providing a spur to future engagement with both nation and national literature". Speculating on De Forest's intentions when devising the Great American Novel idea and commenting upon its development, Cheryl Strayed wrote that:
De Forest was arguing in hopes of not one Great American Novel, but rather the development of a literary canon that accurately portrayed our complex national character, has been lost on many, as generation after generation of critics have since engaged in discussions of who might have written the Great American Novel of any given age, and writers have aspired to be the one chosen — a competitive mode that is, I suppose, as American as it gets. It's also most likely the reason that the idea has persisted for so long. To think that one might be writing the Great American Novel, as opposed to laboring through a meandering 400-page manuscript...is awfully reassuring. I have a purpose! I am writing the Great American Novel!
Regarding the lack of consensus, critic A. O. Scott compared it to the Yeti, the Loch Ness monster and the Sasquatch, in that many people—some boasting "impressive documentation"—have "[claimed] to have seen it".
Equivalents to the Great American Novel in other media have been proposed. For example:
DeForest claimed that "the Great American Poem" could only be created after the United States had experienced hundreds of years of democracy; however, he believed that the Great American Novel could be written much sooner. Mark Binelli of the New York Times called documentary filmmaker Frederick Wiseman the "Great American Novelist" and said that his 50-year filmography was a manifestation of the Great American Novel. Jess Zafariss suggested that the Marvel comics by Jack Kirby and Stan Lee deserve the title.
|1826||The Last of the Mohicans||James Fenimore Cooper||Although De Forest critiqued Cooper's writing as boring, many consider The Last of the Mohicans to be the first GAN. It was influential in defining American literature and addresses themes which are common in later American works, including rugged individualism and freedom.|||
|1850||The Scarlet Letter||Nathaniel Hawthorne||Although De Forest specifically labelled The Scarlet Letter as not being worthy of the label of GAN, it is now widely included on most lists. Buell recognized it as a "reluctant master text"—his first GAN script.|||
|1851||Moby-Dick||Herman Melville||According to Hester Blum of Penn State University, "What makes Moby-Dick the Greatest American Novel, in other words, is that Melville can invoke the preposterous image of a sobbing, heart-stricken moose and we think, yes, I have come to know exactly what that sounds like, and I know what world of meaning is contained within that terrific sound".|||
|1852||Uncle Tom's Cabin||Harriet Beecher Stowe||Buell claimed it to be the first novel to receive the acclaim of the GAN and that it was widely accepted that it was 'nearest approach to the desired phenomenon'. De Forest noted it as the only possible contender and as "a picture of American life".|||
|1884||Adventures of Huckleberry Finn||Mark Twain||The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was one of the first American novels to utilize a regional vernacular. In 1935, Ernest Hemingway stated that "All modern American literature comes from one book by Mark Twain called 'Huckleberry Finn'." William van O'Connor wrote, in a 1955 issue of College English, that "we are informed, from a variety of critical positions, that [it] is the truly American novel".|||
|1895||The Red Badge of Courage||Stephen Crane||Crane was among the earliest generation of American novelists to be influenced by De Forest and consciously strove to produce a "National Novel". Critic Robert Barr had named him the "most likely to produce the great American novel" only two years before Crane died suddenly at the age of 28. According to Yale professor of literature Jay Martin, Crane's war novel The Red Badge of Courage, set during the Civil War, "marks the culmination of the Great American Novel".|||
|1899||McTeague||Frank Norris||McTeague was declared a GAN as early as 1899. The librarian Faith Lee puts McTeague's status as a GAN beyond doubt. Norris's novel The Octopus has been declared one of the three GANs by Bill Kauffman.|||
|1925||The Great Gatsby||F. Scott Fitzgerald||Emory Elliott, wrote, in 1991, that it is "still frequently nominated as the GAN". Kirsch, in 2013, said it to be "one of the first titles to come to mind whenever the Great American Novel is mentioned". Deirdre Donahue of USA Today and Fitzgerald scholar James L. W. West III felt that its "embodiment of the American spirit", relevance and prose were the reasons as to why it's the GAN.|||
|1925||Gentlemen Prefer Blondes||Anita Loos||Edith Wharton and Frank Crowninshield proclaimed the novel to be the GAN.|||
|1936||Absalom, Absalom!||William Faulkner||Absalom, Absalom! has been said to represent Buell's "romance of the divide".|||
|1939||The Grapes of Wrath||John Steinbeck||Jay Parini identified it as "a great American novel" due to its focus on America during a crisis and the eclectic depiction of American life. Richard Rodriguez, similarly, felt that it was "the great American novel that everyone keeps waiting for" because of how it showed "the losers in America". Bill Kauffman declared one of three possible candidates for the GAN.|||
|1951||The Catcher in the Rye||J. D. Salinger||The Catcher in the Rye is an example of a writer setting out to write the GAN and receiving such praise.|||
|1952||Invisible Man||Ralph Ellison||Joseph Fruscione said that the Invisible Man was the GAN because it can be "many things to many readers".|||
|1953||The Adventures of Augie March||Saul Bellow||Amis felt that The Adventures of Augie March was the GAN because of its "fantastic inclusiveness, its pluralism, its qualmless promiscuity".|||
|1955||Lolita||Vladimir Nabokov||Mary Elizabeth Williams called Lolita the GAN because of its prose.|||
|1960||To Kill a Mockingbird||Harper Lee||Scalzi calls it a GAN in that it is a notable and ubiquitous work that also deals with morality and the American experience. Oprah Winfrey described it as "our national novel."|||
|1973||Gravity's Rainbow||Thomas Pynchon||Pynchon's postmodern novel of World War II is commonly cited as "the most important American novel" of the post-war era. It has been said to conform to Buell's fourth type of GAN.|||
|1985||Blood Meridian||Cormac McCarthy||Vann felt that Blood Meridian was a GAN because it explored America's genocidal past.|||
|1987||Beloved||Toni Morrison||The novel is noted for its depiction of the psychological effects of slavery and racism. When Beloved topped a poll seeking "the best work of American fiction" published from 1980–2005, A. O. Scott remarked that "Any other outcome would have been startling, since Morrison's novel has inserted itself into the American canon more completely than any of its potential rivals." Beloved has been noted to align with Buell's third type of GAN.|||
|1991||American Psycho||Bret Easton Ellis||Julia Keller saw the novel's inclusion of "brand names and sex and social anxiety" as part of the reason why it is the GAN.|||
|1996||Infinite Jest||David Foster Wallace||Buell noted that "For an appreciable number of turn-of-the-twenty-first-century readers...Infinite Jest [is] the GAN of our days".|||
|1997||Underworld||Don DeLillo||According to Robert McCrum, it developed a reputation as the GAN almost immediately after its publication.|||
|2010||Freedom||Jonathan Franzen||Buell described it as the "most widely acclaimed GAN contender...post-9/11".|||
|2012||Telegraph Avenue||Michael Chabon||John Freeman of the Boston Globe, praised Chabon for "imagining the Great American Novel with a multiracial cast."|||
There are, Buell says, four main types of potential Great American Novels. Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter epitomises the first – a cultural 'master narrative', identified as such by the number of reinterpretations and imitations that follow in its wake.
It was called the 'great American novel' as early as 1891 by the English writer Andrew Lang ...
It is a great American novel. No doubt about it. And if you haven’t read it, Karl Bridges and I recommend that you do. Bridges describes Norris’ novel as being similar to Émile Zola’s realistic tone and style, but “distinctive in its American voice”.
There hasn't been anything like this novel since it was written. And this is the great American novel that everyone keeps waiting for but it has been written now.
It is Lee's only book and one of the handful that could earn the title of Great American Novel.(Lee has since published a sequel, Go Set a Watchman.)
McCarthy's descriptive powers make him the best prose stylist working today, and this book the Great American Novel.