A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader,[1] is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a glorious leader, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. Historically, it has developed through techniques of mass media, propaganda, spectacle, the arts, patriotism, and government-organized demonstrations and rallies. A cult of personality is similar to apotheosis, except that it is established by modern social engineering techniques, usually by the state or the party in one-party states and dominant-party states. Cults of personality often accompany the leaders of totalitarian or authoritarian governments. They can also be seen in some monarchies, theocracies, failed democracies and even in liberal democracies.


See also: Imperial cult

Augustus of Prima Porta, 1st century CE

Throughout human history, monarchs and other heads of state were frequently treated with enormous reverence and they were also thought to be endowed with super-human qualities. Through the principle of the divine right of kings, notably in medieval Europe, rulers were said to hold office by the will of God or the will of the gods. Ancient Egypt, Imperial Japan, the Inca, the Aztecs, Tibet, Siam (now Thailand), and the Roman Empire are especially noted for their redefinition of monarchs as "god-kings". Furthermore, the Imperial cult of ancient Rome identified emperors and some members of their families with the divinely sanctioned authority (auctoritas) of the Roman State.

The spread of democratic and secular ideas in Europe and North America in the 18th and 19th centuries made it increasingly difficult for monarchs to preserve this aura, though Napoleon III,[2] and Queen Victoria[3] appreciated its perpetuation in their carte-de-visite portraits which proliferated, circulated and were collected in the 19th century.[4][5][6]

The subsequent development of mass media, such as radio, enabled political leaders to project a positive image of themselves onto the masses as never before. It was from these circumstances in the 20th century that the most notorious personality cults arose. Frequently, these cults are a form of political religion.[7]

The advent of the Internet and the World Wide Web in the 21st century has renewed the personality cult phenomenon. Disinformation via social media platforms and the twenty-four hour news cycle has enabled the widespread dissemination and acceptance of deceptive information and propaganda.[8] As a result, personality cults have grown and remained popular in many places, corresponding with a marked rise in authoritarian government across the world.[9]

The term "cult of personality" likely appeared in English around 1800–1850, along with the French and German versions of the term.[10] It initially had no political connotations, but was instead closely related to the Romanticist "cult of genius".[10] The first known political use of the phrase appeared in a letter from Karl Marx to German political worker Wilhelm Blos dated to November 10, 1877:[10]

Neither of us cares a straw of popularity. Let me cite one proof of this: such was my aversion to the personality cult [orig. Personenkultus] that at the time of the International, when plagued by numerous moves ... to accord me public honor, I never allowed one of these to enter the domain of publicity ...[10][11]


1859 carte de visite of Napoleon III by Disdéri, which popularized the carte-de-visite format

There are various views about what constitutes a cult of personality in a leader. Historian Jan Plamper wrote that modern-day personality cults display five characteristics that set them apart from "their predecessors": The cults are secular and "anchored in popular sovereignty"; their objects are all males; they target the entire population, not only the well-to-do or just the ruling class; they use mass media; they exist where the mass media can be controlled enough to inhibit the introduction of "rival cults".[12]

In his 2013 paper, "What is character and why it really does matter", Thomas A. Wright stated, "The cult of personality phenomenon refers to the idealized, even god-like, public image of an individual consciously shaped and molded through constant propaganda and media exposure. As a result, one is able to manipulate others based entirely on the influence of public personality ... the cult of personality perspective focuses on the often shallow, external images that many public figures cultivate to create an idealized and heroic image."[13]

Adrian Teodor Popan defined a cult of personality as a "quantitatively exaggerated and qualitatively extravagant public demonstration of praise of the leader." He also identified three causal "necessary, but not sufficient, structural conditions, and a path-dependent chain of events which, together, lead to the cult formation: a particular combination of patrimonialism and clientelism, lack of dissidence, and systematic falsification pervading the society's culture."[14]

One underlying characteristic, as explained by John Pittman, is the nature of the cult of personalities to be a patriarch. The idea of the cult of personalities that coincides with the Marxist movements gains popular footing among the men in power with the idea that they would be the "fathers of the people".[according to whom?] By the end of the 1920s, the male features of the cults became more extreme. Pittman identifies that these features became roles including the "formal role for a [male] 'great leader' as a cultural focus of the apparatus of the regime: reliance on top-down 'administrative measures': and a pyramidal structure of authority" which was created by a single ideal.[15]

Role of mass media

The twentieth century brought technological advancements that made it possible for regimes to package propaganda in the form of radio broadcasts, films, and later content on the internet.

Writing in 2013, Thomas A. Wright observed that "[i]t is becoming evident that the charismatic leader, especially in politics, has increasingly become the product of media and self-exposure."[13] Focusing on the media in the United States, Robert N. Bellah added, "It is hard to determine the extent to which the media reflect the cult of personality in American politics and to what extent they have created it. Surely they did not create it all alone, but just as surely they have contributed to it. In any case, American politics is dominated by the personalities of political leaders to an extent rare in the modern world ... in the personalized politics of recent years the 'charisma' of the leader may be almost entirely a product of media exposure."[16]


Statue of Syrian dictator Hafez al-Assad, who is revered as their Al-Abad (Immortal Leader) by followers of Syrian Ba'athism[17]

Often, a single leader became associated with this revolutionary transformation and came to be treated as a benevolent "guide" for the nation without whom the claimed transformation to a better future could not occur. Generally, this has been the justification for personality cults that arose in totalitarian societies, such as those of Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany, Joseph Stalin of the USSR, Kim Il Sung, his son Kim Jong Il, and currently ruling grandson Kim Jong Un, of North Korea, Mao Zedong of the People’s Republic of China and Hafez al-Assad of Syria, whose son Bashar al Assad currently rules the country.

Admiration for Mao Zedong has remained widespread in China in spite of somewhat general knowledge of his actions. In December 2013, a Global Times poll revealed that over 85% of Chinese viewed Mao's achievements as outweighing his mistakes.[18]

Jan Plamper argues while Napoleon III made some innovations in France, it was Benito Mussolini in Italy in the 1920s who originated the model of dictator-as-cult-figure that was emulated by Hitler, Stalin and the others, using the propaganda powers of a totalitarian state.[19]

Pierre du Bois de Dunilac argues that the Stalin cult was elaborately constructed to legitimize his rule. Many deliberate distortions and falsehoods were used.[20] The Kremlin refused access to archival records that might reveal the truth, and key documents were destroyed. Photographs were altered and documents were invented.[21] People who knew Stalin were forced to provide "official" accounts to meet the ideological demands of the cult, especially as Stalin himself presented it in 1938 in Short Course on the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), which became the official history.[22]

Historian David L. Hoffmann states "The Stalin cult was a central element of Stalinism, and as such it was one of the most salient features of Soviet rule ... Many scholars of Stalinism cite the cult as integral to Stalin's power or as evidence of Stalin's megalomania."[23]

In Latin America, Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser link the "cult of the leader" to the concept of the caudillo, a strong leader "who exercises a power that is independent of any office and free of any constraint." These populist strongmen are portrayed as "masculine and potentially violent" and enhance their authority through the use of the cult of personality. Mudde and Kaltwasser trace the linkage back to Juan Perón of Argentina.[1]

States and systems with personality cults

Main article: List of cults of personality


"Smith of the New Great Argentina" (poster 1947)

See also: Peronism and Evita Perón

Juan Perón, who was elected three times as President of Argentina, and his second wife, Eva "Evita" Perón, were immensely popular among many of the Argentine people, and to this day they are still considered icons by the leading Justicialist Party. In contrast, academics and detractors often considered him a demagogue and a dictator. Perón sympathised with the Axis powers when he was a colonel and Minister of War[24] and even served as a diplomatic envoy to Fascist Italy. During his regime he kept close ties with Francoist Spain. He ferociously persecuted dissents and potential political rivals, as political arrests were common during his first two terms. He eroded the republican principles of the country as a way to stay in power and forced statewide censorship on most media.[25] Following his election, he built a personality cult around both himself and his wife so pervasive it is still a part of Argentina's current political life.[26]

During Perón's regime, schools were forced to read Evita's biography La Razón de mi Vida, union and government jobs were only given to those who could prove themselves to be a fervent Peronist, newspapers were censored and television and radio networks were nationalized, and only state media was allowed. He often showed contempt for any opponents, regularly characterizing them as traitors and agents of foreign powers. Those who did not fall in line or were perceived as a threat to Perón's political power were subject to losing their jobs, threats, violence and harassment. Perón dismissed over 20,000 university professors and faculty members from all major public education institutions.[27] Universities were then intervened, the faculty was pressured to get in line and those who resisted were blacklisted, dismissed or exiled. Numerous prominent cultural and intellectual figures were imprisoned.[28] Thousands of artists, scientists, writers and academics left the country, migrated to North America or Europe. Union leaders and political rivals were arrested and tortured for years[29][30] and were only released after Perón was deposed.[31]


Main article: Heydar Aliyev's cult of personality


Main articles: Bolsonarism and 2022–2023 Brazilian election protests


Chinese propaganda poster proclaiming "Long Live the President"

Chiang Kai-shek had a cult of personality. His portraits were common in private homes and in public on the streets.[32][33] When the Muslim general and warlord Ma Lin was interviewed, he was described as having "high admiration for and unwavering loyalty to Chiang Kai-shek".[34]

A cult of personality has been developing around Xi Jinping since he became General Secretary of the ruling Chinese Communist Party and the regime's paramount leader in 2012.[35][36][37]

Mao Zedong

Main article: Mao Zedong's cult of personality

Statue of Mao Zedong in China

Mao Zedong's cult of personality was a prominent part of Chairman Mao Zedong's rule over the People's Republic of China from his rise in 1949 until his death in 1976. Mass media, propaganda and a series of other techniques were used by the state to elevate Mao Zedong's status to that of an infallible heroic leader, who could stand up against The West, and guide China to become a beacon of Communism. Mao himself, however, publicly criticized the personality cult which was formed around him.[38]

During the period of the Cultural Revolution, Mao's personality cult soared to an unprecedented height. Mao's face was firmly established on the front page of People's Daily, where a column of his quotes was also printed every day. Mao's Selected Works were later printed in even greater circulation; the number of his portraits (1.2 billion) was more than the inhabitants in China. And soon Chairman Mao badges began to appear; in total, about 4.8 billion were manufactured.[39] Every Chinese citizen was presented with the Little Red Book – a selection of quotes from Mao. It was prescribed to be carried everywhere and displayed at all public events, and citizens were expected to quote the contents of the book daily.[40] Mao himself believed that the situation had gone out of hand, and in a conversation with Edgar Snow in 1970, he denounced the titles of "Great Leader, Great Supreme Commander, Great Helmsman" and insisted on only being called "teacher".[41]

After the Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping and others launched the "Boluan Fanzheng" program which invalidated the Cultural Revolution and abandoned (and forbade) the use of a personality cult.[42][43][44]

Dominican Republic

See also: Rafael Trujillo § Personality cult

Longtime dictator of the Dominican Republic Rafael Trujillo (ruled 1930–1961) was the center of a large personality cult. The nation's capital city, its highest peak, and a province were renamed for him. Statues of "El Jefe" were mass-produced and erected across the country, and bridges and public buildings were named in his honor. Automobile license plates included slogans such as "¡Viva Trujillo!" and "Año Del Benefactor De La Patria" (Year of the Benefactor of the Nation). An electric sign was erected in Ciudad Trujillo so that "Dios y Trujillo" could be seen at night as well as in the day. Eventually, even churches were required to post the slogan "Dios en el cielo, Trujillo en la tierra" (God in Heaven, Trujillo on Earth). As time went on, the order of the phrases was reversed (Trujillo on Earth, God in Heaven).[45]


Main article: Propaganda of Fascist Italy

"Kids, you have to love Benito Mussolini. He always works for the good of the Fatherland and the Italian people. You have heard this many times, from your dad, mom, or teacher: If Italy is now far more powerful than before, we owe it to Him." (1936 textbook)

Benito Mussolini was portrayed as the embodiment of Italian Fascism and was keen to be seen as such.[46] Mussolini was styled by other Italian fascists as Il Duce ("The Leader"). Since Mussolini was represented as an almost omniscient leader, a common saying in Italy during Mussolini's rule was "The Duce is always right" (Italian: Il Duce ha sempre ragione).[47] Mussolini became a unifying force in Italy in order for ordinary Italians to put their difference to one side with local officials. The personality cult surrounding Mussolini became a way for him to justify his personal rule and it acted as a way to enable social and political integration.

Mussolini's military service in World War I and survival of failed assassination attempts were used to convey a mysterious aura around him.[48] Fascist propaganda stated that Mussolini's body had been pierced by shrapnel just like St. Sebastian had been pierced by arrows, the difference being that Mussolini had survived this ordeal.[48] Mussolini was also compared to St. Francis of Assisi, who had, like Mussolini, "suffered and sacrificed himself for others".[49]

The press were given instructions on what and what not to write about Mussolini.[46] Mussolini himself authorized which photographs of him were allowed to be published and rejected any photographs which made him appear weak or less prominent than he wanted to be portrayed as in a particular group.[50]

Italy's war against Ethiopia (1935–37) was portrayed in propaganda as a revival of the Roman Empire, with Mussolini as the first Roman emperor Augustus.[51] To improve his own image, as well as the image of Fascism in the Arab world, Mussolini declared himself to be the "Protector of Islam" during an official visit to Libya in 1937.[52]


During the days of the freedom struggle, Mahatma Gandhi had a cult-like following amongst the people of India. The assasination of Gandhi in 1948 led to widespread violence against Marathi brahmins by his followers. After Gandhi's death, his cult was eclipsed by another personality cult that had developed around India's first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru.[53] C Rajagopalachari criticized the personality cult surrounding Nehru, saying that there should be an opposition group within the Congress. Rajagopalachari later formed the economically right-wing Swatantra Party in opposition to Nehru's socialist economic view.[54] The expression 'Nehruvian consensus' reflects the dominance of Nehruvian ideals, a product of Nehru's personality cult and the associated statism, i.e. the overarching faith in the state and the leadership.[55] However, Nehru himself actively discouraged the creation of a cult of personality around him.[56] He wrote an essay titled 'Rashtrapati' in 1937 published in the Modern Review warning people about dictatorship and emphasizing the value of questioning leaders.[57]

The Congress party has been accused of promoting a personality cult centered around Nehru, his daughter Indira Gandhi & the Nehru-Gandhi family.[58] Indira Gandhi has also been described as having a cult of personality during her administration.[59] Following India's victory in the 1971 Indo-Pak war, Gandhi was hailed by many as a manifestation of the Hindu goddess Durga.[60] Devakanta Barooah, the then Congress party president had remarked 'India is Indira, Indira is India'. Her assassination in 1984 by her Sikh bodyguards sparked a massive wave of public grief & anti-Sikh violence. The Congress party led by her son Rajiv Gandhi utilised her death to win the general elections shortly held after. His assassination while campaigning in the 1991 general elections also led to widespread public grief, which was utilised by the Congress to win the elections despite unfavorable circumstances.

Current Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is often criticized for creating a personality cult around him.[61][62] Despite some setbacks and criticism,[63][64][65] Modi's charisma and popularity was a key factor that helped the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) return to power in the 2019 general elections.[66] Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the chief minister of the country's second largest state, said in 2022, "He is superhuman and has traces of God in him."[67] The Opposition often accused Modi for spreading propaganda using popular media such as movies, television and web series.[68][69][70][71] In 2021, Modi named the world's largest cricket stadium after himself. During the 2024 general elections, Modi tried to divinise himself in an interview, in which he stated that he viewed himself to be sent directly by God to serve a special purpose on Earth.[72] BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra while campaigning in the Hindu holy city of Puri stated that even Jagannath (the form of the Hindu god Vishnu which is venerated there) worships Modi.[73] The BJP is also stated to have created a cult of personality around Hindu Mahasabha leader V. D. Savarkar & Gandhi's assasin Nathuram Godse to oppose the dominance of Gandhian philosophy in Indian society.[74][75]

One study claims that India's political culture since the decline of the Congress' single-handed dominance over national politics from the 1990s has paved way for personality cults centered around leaders of the small regional parties,[76] derived from hero-worship of sportspersons & film industry celebrities and the concept of bhakti,[77] which in turn has fostered nepotism, cronyism & sycophancy. Among these leaders, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalitha had one of the most extensive ones. She was widely referred by leaders & members of her party as Amma ('mother' in Tamil, also used to refer to Hindu goddesses) & would prostrate themselves before her. Her government provided various kinds of subsidised goods under the brand name of Amma. Widespread violence broke out throughout the state when she was arrested on charges of corruption. A huge wave of public grief swept all over the state, with some even committing suicide, following her death in 2016.[78][79] Another leader, Mayawati, was also known for attempting to foster a cult of personality during her tenure as the Chief Minister of India's most populous state by getting constructed large statues of herself & the elephant (which was the electoral symbol of her party) that were installed in public parks at the cost of government exchequer.[80]


Main articles: Adolf Hitler's cult of personality and Führerprinzip

Adolf Hitler at the Nuremberg Rally in 1936

Starting in the 1920s, during the early years of the Nazi Party, Nazi propaganda began to depict the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler as a demagogue figure who was the almighty defender and savior of Germany. After the end of World War I and the Treaty of Versailles, the German people were left in turmoil under the Weimar Republic, and, according to Nazi propaganda, only Hitler could save them and restore Germany's greatness, which in turn gave rise to the "Führer-cult".[81] During the five election campaigns in 1932, the Nazi newspaper Völkischer Beobachter portrayed Hitler as a man who had a mass movement united behind him, a man with one mission to solely save Germany as the 'Leader of the coming Germany'.[82] The Night of the Long Knives in 1934 – after which Hitler referred to himself as being single-handedly "responsible for the fate of the German people" – also helped to reinforce the myth that Hitler was the sole protector of the Volksgemeinschaft, the ethnic community of the German people.[83]

Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels cultivated an image of Hitler as a "heroic genius".[81] The myth also gave rise to the saying and concept, "If only the Führer knew". Germans thought that problems which they ascribed to the Nazi hierarchy would not have occurred if Hitler had been aware of the situation; thus Nazi bigwigs were blamed, and Hitler escaped criticism.[83]

British historian Ian Kershaw published his book The "Hitler Myth": Image and Reality in the Third Reich in 1987 and wrote:

Hitler stood for at least some things they [German people] admired, and for many had become the symbol and embodiment of the national revival which the Third Reich had in many respects been perceived to accomplish.[84]

During the early 1930s, the myth was given credence due to Hitler's perceived ability to revive the German economy during the Great Depression. However, Albert Speer wrote that by 1939, the myth was under threat and the Nazis had to organize cheering crowds to turn up to events. Speer wrote:

The shift in the mood of the population, the drooping morale which began to be felt throughout Germany in 1939, was evident in the necessity to organize cheering crowds where two years earlier Hitler had been able to count on spontaneity. What is more, he himself had meanwhile moved away from the admiring masses. He tended to be angry and impatient more often than in the past when, as still occasionally happened, a crowd on Wilhelmsplatz began clamoring for him to appear. Two years before he had often stepped out on the "historic balcony." Now he sometimes snapped at his adjutants when they came to him with the request that he show himself: "Stop bothering me with that!"[85]

The myth helped to unite the German people during World War II, especially against the Soviet Union and the Western Allies. During Hitler's early victories against Poland and Western Europe the myth was at its peak, but when it became obvious to most Germans that the war was lost then the myth was exposed and Hitler's popularity declined.

A report is given in the little Bavarian town of Markt Schellenberg on March 11, 1945:

When the leader of the Wehrmacht unit at the end of his speech called for a Sieg Heil for the Führer, it was returned neither by the Wehrmacht present, nor by the Volkssturm, nor by the spectators of the civilian population who had turned up. This silence of the masses ... probably reflects better than anything else, the attitudes of the population.[86]

North Korea

Main article: North Korean cult of personality

North Korean poster featuring Kim Il-Sung

The cult of personality which surrounds North Korea's ruling family, the Kim family,[87] has existed for decades and it can be found in many aspects of North Korean culture.[88] Although not acknowledged by the North Korean government, many defectors and Western visitors state there are often stiff penalties for those who criticize or do not show "proper" respect for the regime.[89][90] The personality cult began soon after Kim Il Sung took power in 1948, and was greatly expanded after his death in 1994.

The pervasiveness and the extreme nature of North Korea's personality cult surpasses those of Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong.[91] The cult is also marked by the intensity of the people's feelings for and devotion to their leaders,[92] and the key role played by a Confucianized ideology of familism both in maintaining the cult and thereby in sustaining the regime itself. The North Korean cult of personality is a large part of Juche and totalitarianism.

Yakov Novichenko, a Soviet military officer who saved Kim Il Sung's life on 1 May 1946, is reported to also have developed a cult of personality around 1984. He is considered the only non-Korean to have developed a cult of personality there.[93]


Main article: Fujimorism


Main articles: Diehard Duterte Supporters and Ferdinand Marcos's cult of personality

Ferdinand Marcos developed a cult of personality as a way of remaining President of the Philippines for 20 years,[94][95] in a way that political scientists[who?] have compared to other authoritarian and totalitarian leaders such as Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler,[96] but also to more contemporary dictators such as Suharto in Indonesia, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and the Kim dynasty of North Korea.[97]: p114 

The propaganda techniques used, either by himself or by others, to mythologize Ferdinand Marcos, began with local political machinations in Ilocos Norte while Ferdinand was still the young son of politician and Japanese collaborator Mariano Marcos,[98] and persist today in the efforts to revise the way Marcos is portrayed in Philippine history.[99] According to members of his administration, such as Adrian Cristobal, Marcos's intent was to project an image of himself "the only patron, the king" of Philippine society, which he still saw as a society of tribes."[100] Cristobal furthers that "Marcos and the First Lady wanted more than anything else [...] to be king and queen. They wished to shape the kingdom in their own image; [...] Marcos wanted to be able to say, 'L'État, c'est moi.'"[100] In some extreme cases where Marcos encouraged the formation of cults so that they could serve as a political weapon, Marcos came to be thought of as a God.[101]

These propaganda narratives and techniques include: using red scare tactics such as red-tagging to portray activists as communists and to exaggerate the threat represented by the Communist Party of the Philippines;[102]: "43"  using martial law to take control of mass media and silence criticism;[103] the use of foreign-funded government development projects and construction projects as propaganda tools;[104] creating an entire propaganda framework around a "new society" in which he would rule under a system of "constitutional authoritarianism";[105][99][106] the perpetuation of hagiographical books and films;[107][108] the perpetuation of propaganda narratives about Marcos's activities during World War II, which have since been proven false by historical documents;[109][110] the creation of myths and stories around himself and his family;[111][112] and portrayals of himself in coinage and even a Mount Rushmore type monument;[113] among others."

Since Ferdinand Marcos's death, propaganda efforts have been made to whitewash his place in Philippine history,[114][115] an act of historical negationism[116] commonly referred to using the more popular term "historical revisionism."[117]


Main article: Józef Piłsudski's cult of personality


Main articles: Carol II of Romania's cult of personality and Nicolae Ceaușescu's cult of personality


Main articles: Public image of Vladimir Putin and Russia under Vladimir Putin

Soviet Union

Main articles: Stalin's cult of personality and Stalinism

Propaganda poster of Lenin and Stalin

The first cult of personality to take shape in the USSR was Vladimir Lenin. Up until the dissolution of the USSR, Lenin's portrait and quotes were a ubiquitous part of the culture. However, during his lifetime, Lenin vehemently denounced any effort to build a cult of personality as in his eyes the cult of personality was antithetical to Marxism.[118] Despite this, members of the Communist Party further used Lenin's image as the all-knowing revolutionary who would liberate the proletariat. Lenin attempted to take action against this; however it was halted as Lenin was nearly assassinated in August 1918. His health would only further decline as he suffered numerous severe strokes with the worst in May 1922 and March 1923. In this state Lenin would lose the ability to walk and speak. It was during this time that the Communist Party began to promote the accomplishments of Lenin as the basis for his cult of personality, using him as an image of morality and revolutionary ideas.[15]

After Vladimir Lenin's death in 1924 and the exile of Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin came to embody the Soviet Union. Once Lenin's cult of personality had risen in power, creating enough influence, Stalin integrated his ideals into his own cult.[118] Unlike other cults of personalities, the Lenin and Stalin cults were not created to give the leaders power, they were created to give power and validation to the Communist Party. Stalin initially spoke out against the cult and other outrageous and false claims centered around him. However Stalin's attitude began to shift in favor of the cult in the 1930s and he began to encourage it following the Great Purge.[119] Seldom did Stalin object to state actions that furthered his cult of personality, however he did oppose some initiatives from Soviet propagandists. When Nikolai Yezhov proposed to rename Moscow to "Stalinodar", which translates to "gift of Stalin", Stalin objected.[120] To merge the idea of the Lenin and Stalin cults together, Stalin changed aspects of Lenin's life in the public's eye in order to place himself in power. This kept the two cults in a line that showed that both Lenin and Stalin had the same ideas and that Stalin was the rightful successor of Lenin, leading the USSR in the fashion Lenin would have.[118]

Soviet poster in the Azerbaijani language featuring Stalin, 1938

In December 1929, Stalin celebrated his 50th birthday which made Stalin become a prominent feature in the Soviet press.[121] The Soviet press used positive adjectives like, "Great", "Beloved", "Bold", "Wise", "Inspirer", and "Genius" to describe him.[122] Similarly, speeches that were given by people to the peasants described Stalin as "Our Best Collective Farm Worker", "Our Shockworker, Our Best of Best", and "Our Darling, Our Guiding Star".[122] By 1934, under Stalin's full control of the country, socialist realism became the endorsed method of art and literature.[119] Even under the communist regime, the Stalin cult of personality portrayed Stalin's leadership as patriarchy under the features laid out during Khrushchev's speech.[15] After 1936, the Soviet press described Stalin as the "Father of Nations".[123]

One key element of Soviet propaganda was interactions between Stalin and the children of the Soviet Union. He was often photographed with children of different ethnic backgrounds of the Soviet Union and was often photographed giving gifts to children. In 1935 the phrase, "Thank You, Dear Comrade Stalin, for a Happy Childhood!" started to appear above doorways at nurseries, orphanages, and schools; children also chanted this slogan at festivals.[124] Another key element of Soviet propaganda was imagery of Stalin and Lenin. In many posters, Stalin and Lenin were placed together to show their camaraderie and that their ideals were one. Throughout the 1930s, posters with both images were used as a way to bring the nation and the military together under the policies of the Communist Party during World War II, with the idea of Lenin as the father of the revolutionary ideas and Stalin as the disciple who would fulfill the communist ideals.[119] Stalin was also portrayed in numerous films produced by Mosfilm, which remained a Soviet-led company until the fall of the Soviet Union.


See also: Assad dynasty

Syrian silver pound with Hafez al-Assad's image carved into it

Syria's Hafez al-Assad, a Ba'athist officer who seized power through a coup d'état in 1970, established a pervasive cult of personality to maintain his dictatorship. As soon as he took over power, Ba'ath party loyalists designated him as "Al-Abad"; an Arabic terminology with deep religious dimensions. Linguistically, ''Al-Abad'' means "forever, infinite and immortality" and religious clerics use this term in relation to Divine Attributes. By designating Assad as "Al-Abad", Syrian Ba'ath Movement ideologically elevated Hafez al-Assad as its "Immortal", "god-like figure" who is supposed to represent the state as well as the Syrian nation itself. Another meaning of Al-Abad is "permanent", which is used in state propaganda to denote the perpetual status quo of an "eternal political order" created by Hafez al-Assad, who continues to live in Assadist ideology. The term's verbal form "Abada" means "to commit genocide" including the "symbolical; performative side of violence". This dimension has been weaponized by the Assad regime to monopolize violence against alleged dissidents and justify state terrorism, including genocidal acts of mass murder like the Hama Massacre, Qamishli Massacre and other massacres of the Syrian civil war.[17]

Arab Socialist Ba'ath party initially manufactured Hafez al-Assad's cult of Arab socialist heroism in consultancy with Soviet state propagandists, mimicking the pervasive personality cults prevalent across Soviet Bloc dictatorships like Romania and North Korea. Beginning as a tool to bind every Syrian citizen with the obligation of undying loyalty (bay'ah) to Assad in 1970s, the propaganda was further intensified and personalist depictions reached new heights during the 1980s. The state began re-writing Syrian history itself, with the Ba'ath party deifying Hafez al-Assad as their "leader for eternity" ["qa'iduna ila l-abad"] and portraying him as "the second Saladin" who guarantees Arab peoples victory over Zionist Crusaders. Through kindergarten, school books, educational institutions and Baathist media; Assadist propaganda constructed the image of a homogenous Arab nation protected by a fatherly leader revelling under the "cult of Saladin". Assad regime venerates Hafez al-Assad's personalist iconography perpetually in the public and private spheres of everyday Syrian life; through monuments, images, murals, posters, statues, stamps, Ba'athist symbolism, currency notes, photos, banners, state TV, etc.[125][126] More than a leader of the masses, Ba'athist propaganda equated Hafez al-Assad itself with "the people", apart from declaring him as the "father of the nation" and as an exceptional human being; being assigned with multiple roles as a doctor, soldier, lawyer, educator, statesman, general, etc. Every civil society organization, trade union and any form of cultural or religious associations in Syria, are obliged to declare their "binding covenant to Hafez al-Assad and display his iconography, in order to be legalized. The far-reaching personality cult of his father has been weaponized by Bashar al-Assad as a pillar of his regime's legitimacy and also as a supplement to enhance his own personality cult. Bashar's cult downplays religious elements for technocratic Arab socialist themes, with a constant militaristic emphasis on conspiratorial threats from forces of Zionism due to an allegedly ongoing "dormant war with Israel".[127]

One utilization of the personality cult has been to enable the Assad dynasty to downplay the rural Alawite origins of their family from public eyes. Images of Assad family members are installed across Syria's numerous heritage sites and monuments, to wed the dynasty with Ba'athist Syrian history. Murals and statues of Hafez al-Assad and Bashar al-Assad are constructed across Syrian cities, towns, villages, etc. depicting them in the costumes of medieval Bedouins or as sultans like Harun al-Rashid.[128] Assadist cult of personality functions as a psychological tool for the totalitarian regime; which attempts to claim towards the Syrian society that the Ba'athist system shall continue ruling eternally, forever, with no end.[17]


Main articles: List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire, Neo-Ottomanism, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's cult of personality, Kemalism, Public image of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Erdoğanism

Monument to Atatürk in Kadıköy, Istanbul

In Turkey, founder of the Turkish Republic Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is commemorated by a myriad of memorials throughout the country, such as the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, the Atatürk Bridge over the Golden Horn (Haliç), the Atatürk Dam, and Atatürk Stadium. His titles include Great Leader (Ulu Önder), Eternal Commander (Ebedî Başkomutan), Head Teacher (Başöğretmen), and Eternal Chief (Ebedî Şef). Atatürk statues have been erected in all Turkish cities by the Turkish Government, and most towns have their own memorial to him. His face and name are seen and heard everywhere in Turkey; his portrait can be seen in all public buildings, in all schools and classrooms, on all school textbooks, on all Turkish lira banknotes, and in the homes of many Turkish families.[129]

A wall rug of Erdoğan at a rally of his party

At the exact time of Atatürk's death, on every 10 November, at 09:05, most vehicles and people in the country's streets pause for one minute in remembrance.[130] In 1951, the Turkish Parliament issued a law (5816) outlawing insults to his reminiscence (Turkish: hatırasına alenen hakaret) or destruction of objects representing him, which is still in force.[131] There is a government website[132] that is aimed at denouncing different kinds of crimes found on the internet, including with the 8th element crimes committed against Atatürk (Turkish: Atatürk aleyhine işlenen suçlar). Turkish government as of 2011 has filters in place to block websites deemed to contain materials insulting to his memory.

The start of Atatürk's cult of personality is placed in the 1920s when the first statues started being built.[133] The idea of Atatürk as the "father of the Turks" is ingrained in Turkish politics and politicians in that country are evaluated in relation to his cult of personality.[134] The persistence of the phenomenon of Atatürk's personality cult has become an area of deep interest to scholars.[135]

Atatürk impersonators are also seen around Turkey much after Atatürk's death to preserve what is called the "world's longest-running personality cult".[136]

Ottoman sultans Mehmed the Conqueror and Abdul Hamid II have cults of personality created by religious conservatives and Islamists. They associate the policies of these statesmen with their "piety".

In recent years there has been a growing cult of personality in modern Turkey around current President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

The cults created for the sultans and Erdoğan are kept alive by devout Muslims who oppose secular lifestyle and secularist ideas.

United States

Main articles: Trumpism, Reaganism, and Huey Long


Main article: Hugo Chávez's cult of personality

See also


  1. ^ a b Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0190234874
  2. ^ Plunkett, John (2013). "Carte-de-visite". In Hannavy, John (ed.). Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Photography. Routledge. pp. 276–277. doi:10.4324/9780203941782. ISBN 978-0203941782.
  3. ^ "Fine Arts: Mr Mayall's Photographic Exhibition". Morning Herald. London. August 16, 1860. p. 6.
  4. ^ Darrah, William C. (1981). Cartes de Visite in Nineteenth Century Photography. Gettysburg, PA: W. C. Darrah Publishing. p. 43. ISBN 978-0913116050. OCLC 8012190.
  5. ^ Di Bello, Patrizia (March 19, 2013). "Carte-de-visite: the photographic portrait as ʻsocial mediaʼ" (PDF). Understanding British Portraits: Copy, Version and Multiple: the replication and distribution of portrait imagery. – via Seminar: M Shed, Bristol.
  6. ^ Rudd, Annie (2016). "Victorians Living in Public: Cartes de Visite as 19th-Century Social Media". Photography and Culture. 9 (3): 195–217. doi:10.1080/17514517.2016.1265370. S2CID 193760648.
  7. ^ Plamper 2012, pp. 13–14.
  8. ^ Pathak, Archita; Srihari, Rohini; Natu, Nihit (2021). "Disinformation: analysis and identification". Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 27 (3). United States National Library of Medicine: 357–375. doi:10.1007/s10588-021-09336-x. PMC 8212793. PMID 34177355.
  9. ^ Talisse, Robert B. (January 3, 2022). "Not all polarization is bad, but the US could be in trouble". The Conversation. Retrieved March 10, 2022.
  10. ^ a b c d Heller, Klaus (2004). Heller, Klaus; Plamper, Jan (eds.). Personality Cults in Stalinism/Personenkulte im Stalinismus. Göttingen: V&R Unipress. pp. 23–33. ISBN 978-3899711912.
  11. ^ Blos, Wilhelm. "Brief von Karl Marx an Wilhelm Blos". Denkwürdigkeiten eines Sozialdemokraten. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  12. ^ Plamper 2012, p. 222.
  13. ^ a b Wright, Thomas A.; Lauer, Tyler L. (2013). "What is character and why it really does matter". Fordham University: Business Faculty Publications. 2. Fordham University: 29. Retrieved June 13, 2019.
  14. ^ Popan, Adrian Teodor (August 2015). The ABC of Sycophancy: Structural Conditions for the Emergence of Dictators' Cults of Personality (PDF) (Thesis). University of Texas at Austin. doi:10.15781/T2J960G15. hdl:2152/46763.
  15. ^ a b c Pittman, John (2017). "Thoughts on the "Cult of Personality" in Communist History". The Russian Revolution One Century Later. 81 (4): 533–547. doi:10.1521/siso.2017.81.4.533 – via Guilford Press Periodicals.
  16. ^ Bellah, Robert N. (1986). "The Meaning of Reputation in American Society". California Law Review. 74 (3): 747. doi:10.15779/Z386730. Archived from the original on April 26, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.
  17. ^ a b c Bader Eddin, Eylaf (November 8, 2022). "Al-Abad: On the Ongoing". Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication. 15 (4): 367–372. doi:10.1163/18739865-01504004. S2CID 253455744. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023 – via Brill.
  18. ^ "Mao's achievements 'outweigh' mistakes: poll". al-Jazeera. December 23, 2013.
  19. ^ Plamper 2012, pp. 4, 12–14.
  20. ^ du Bois, Pierre (1984). "Stalin – Genesis of a Myth". Survey. A Journal of East & West Studies. 28 (1): 166–181. See abstract in Egan, David R.; Melinda A. Egan (2007). Joseph Stalin: An Annotated Bibliography of English-Language Periodical Literature to 2005. Scarecrow Press. p. 157. ISBN 978-0810866713.
  21. ^ Strong, Carol; Killingsworth, Matt (2011). "Stalin the Charismatic Leader?: Explaining the 'Cult of Personality' as a legitimation technique". Politics, Religion & Ideology. 12 (4): 391–411. doi:10.1080/21567689.2011.624410. S2CID 144628885.
  22. ^ Maslov, N. N. (1989). "Short Course of the History of the All-Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik) – An Encyclopedia of Stalin's Personality Cult". Soviet Studies in History. 28 (3): 41–68. doi:10.2753/RSH1061-1983280341.
  23. ^ Hoffmann, David L. (2013). "The Stalin Cult". The Historian. 75 (4): 909. doi:10.1111/hisn.12023_65. S2CID 145070443.
  24. ^ "Neighbor Accused". Time. February 18, 1946. Archived from the original on January 29, 2009.
  25. ^ Martínez, Tomás Eloy (January 20, 1997). "The woman behind the fantasy. prostitute, fascist, profligate – Eva Perón was much maligned, mostly unfairly". Time. Archived from the original on December 21, 2001. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
  26. ^ Politics and Education in Argentina, 1946–1962, by Mónica Esti Rein; trans by Martha Grenzeback. Published by M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY/London, 1998, pp. 79–80.
  27. ^ Rock, David (1987). Argentina, 1516–1982. University of California Press.
  28. ^ "Palermo online". Palermonline.com.ar. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  29. ^ Pigna, Felipe. "Ricardo Balbín". Elhistoriador.com.ar (in Spanish). El Historiador. Archived from the original on November 28, 2011. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  30. ^ Feitlowitz, Marguerite (2002). A Lexicon of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture. Oxford University Press.
  31. ^ "Clarín". Clarin.com. August 2, 2001. Archived from the original on June 27, 2009. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  32. ^ Pakula 2009, p. 531.
  33. ^ Tyson Li, Laura (2007). Madame Chiang Kai-shek: China's Eternal First Lady. Grove Press. p. 448. ISBN 978-0-8021-4322-8. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved June 28, 2010.
  34. ^ The Moslem World, Volumes 31–34. Hartford Seminary Foundation. 1941. p. 183. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved May 8, 2011.
  35. ^ "The rise of the personality cult of Xi Jinping- La Croix International". international.la-croix.com. March 3, 2015. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  36. ^ Zhu, Jiayang Fan, Taisu Zhang, Ying (March 8, 2016). "Behind the Personality Cult of Xi Jinping". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.((cite web)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ "The power of Xi Jinping". The Economist. September 18, 2014. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  38. ^ Lin, Xu and Wu 1995. p. 48.
  39. ^ Barmé, Geremie. (1996). Shades of Mao : the posthumous cult of the great leader. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 0585269017. OCLC 45729144.
  40. ^ Chang, Jung (2007). Mao : the unknown story. Halliday, Jon. London: Vintage. ISBN 978-0099507376. OCLC 71346736.
  41. ^ 阎长贵 (2006). ""四个伟大"是谁提出来的". 党史博览 (8): 49. Archived from the original on March 4, 2015. Retrieved November 27, 2014.
  42. ^ Teon, Aris (March 1, 2018). "Deng Xiaoping On Personality Cult And One-Man Rule – 1980 Interview". The Greater China Journal. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  43. ^ Huang, Zheping (February 26, 2018). "Xi Jinping could now rule China for life – just what Deng Xiaoping tried to prevent". Quartz. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  44. ^ "第八章: 十一届三中全会开辟社会主义事业发展新时期". cpc.people.com.cn. Archived from the original on March 1, 2008. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  45. ^ Roorda, Eric, The Dictator Next Door: the good neighbor policy and the Trujillo regime in the Dominican Republic, 1930–1945. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998, p. 120.
  46. ^ a b Hamilton 1973, p. 73.
  47. ^ Bosworth 2006, p. 3.
  48. ^ a b Falasca-Zamponi 2000, pp. 72–73.
  49. ^ Falasca-Zamponi 2000, pp. 65–66.
  50. ^ Gallo 1973, pp. 206–207.
  51. ^ Brendon 2016, p. 329.
  52. ^ Williams 2006, p. 112.
  53. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (May 3, 2014). "Dangers of hero worship - Reading Ambedkar in the time of Modi". The Telegraph.
  54. ^ Krishnan, Ravi (May 27, 2014). "Nehru's India". Mint.
  55. ^ "Rise and Demise of Nehruvian Consensus: A Historical Review" (PDF).
  56. ^ Sherman, Taylor. "The Myths and Reality of the Nehru Years". Hindustan Times.
  57. ^ "We Want No Caesars: Nehru's Warning to Himself". caravanmagazine. November 14, 2016.
  58. ^ "Chacha's Musty Coat-Tails". outlookindia.com/. February 5, 2022.
  59. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (November 4, 2022). "The Cult of Modi". Foreign Policy. Retrieved April 10, 2023.
  60. ^ DHNS. "Did Vajpayee refer to Indira as Durga avatar?". Deccan Herald. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  61. ^ Vaidyanathan, Rajini. "The 'personality politics' of Narendra Modi and Donald Trump". BBC. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  62. ^ Chatterjee, Manini (May 13, 2019). "I, me, myself: The Modi cult could threaten the BJP too". The Telegraph. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  63. ^ Vaishnav, Milan (May 25, 2019). "Opinion: If it's 'the economy, stupid,' why did Modi win?". Washington Post. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  64. ^ Khare, Harish (November 25, 2016). "The Cult of the Leader: Demonetisation and Modi Worship". The Wire. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  65. ^ Safi, Michael (May 23, 2019). "India election results 2019: Modi claims landslide victory". The Guardian. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  66. ^ Ghosh, Ambar Kumar (May 19, 2019). "Decoding the Modi personality cult". QRIUS. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  67. ^ Dhillon, Amrit (February 2, 2022). "Narendra Modi has traces of god in him, says BJP minister as personality cult grows". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460.
  68. ^ Ray, Saptarshi (April 13, 2019). "How Narendra Modi has tried to co-opt Bollywood to push his cult of personality". The Telegraph. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  69. ^ Tharoor, Shashi (May 28, 2019). "India's Cult of Modi". Project Syndicate. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  70. ^ Sohini, C (February 5, 2019). "The triumph of Modi propaganda in Bollywood". South China Morning Post. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  71. ^ Ghosh, Samrudhi (June 25, 2019). "Vivek Agnihotri: PM Narendra Modi did not even run for 7 days. This is what happens to propaganda films". India Today. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  72. ^ "'God has sent me, convinced that my energy is not biological': Prime Minister Narendra Modi". Business Today. May 23, 2024. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  73. ^ Service, Statesman News (May 20, 2024). "Lord Jagannath is devotee of PM Modi: Sambit Patra". The Statesman. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  74. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (September 22, 2019). "Creating a cult of anti-Gandhis". Hindustan Times.
  75. ^ Serhan, Yasmeen (June 2, 2022). "What the Veneration of Gandhi's Killer Says About India". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 7, 2024.
  76. ^ Sircar, Neelanjan (February 4, 2022). "From Modi to Mamata, how did Indian politics become so dependent on the cult of personality?". Scroll.in. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  77. ^ Guha, Ramachandra (December 4, 2016). "Why bhakti in politics is bad for democracy". Hindustan Times.
  78. ^ "Deconstructing Jayalalithaa's Cult of Personality". The Wire. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  79. ^ "Jayalalitha: The 'goddess' of Tamil Nadu politics". BBC News. December 5, 2016. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  80. ^ Sardesai, Rajdeep (October 20, 2011). "Idolatry Ambedkar Wouldn't Have Liked". Navhind Times.
  81. ^ a b "The Führer Myth How Hitler Won Over the German People". Der Spiegel. January 30, 2008.
  82. ^ Kershaw 1998, pp. 36–37.
  83. ^ a b Kershaw 1998, p. 95.
  84. ^ Kershaw 1998, p. 71.
  85. ^ Speer 2009, p. 158.
  86. ^ Kershaw 2001, p. 766.
  87. ^ Williamson, Lucy (December 27, 2011). "Delving into North Korea's mystical cult of personality". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  88. ^ Choe, Yong-ho., Lee, Peter H., and de Barry, Wm. Theodore., eds. Sources of Korean Tradition, Chichester, NY: Columbia University Press, p. 419, 2000.
  89. ^ Forer, Ben (January 12, 2012). "North Korea Reportedly Punishing Insincere Mourners". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 14, 2012. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  90. ^ "DPRK, Criminal Penalties". US State Dept. December 2, 2011. Archived from the original on January 1, 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  91. ^ Armstrong, Charles K. (2013). The North Korean Revolution, 1945–1950. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 222. ISBN 978-0801468797.
  92. ^ Hunter, Helen-Louise (1999). Kim Il-song's North Korea. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 25. ISBN 978-0275962968. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved August 31, 2013.
  93. ^ Young, Benjamin R. (December 12, 2013). "Meet the man who saved Kim Il Sung's life". NK News. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  94. ^ Root, Hilton L., Three Asian Dictators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (January 16, 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2716732
  95. ^ Mark M. Turner (1990) Authoritarian rule and the dilemma of legitimacy: The case of President Marcos of the Philippines, The Pacific Review, 3:4, 349–362, DOI: 10.1080/09512749008718886
  96. ^ Bautista Maximiano, Jose Mario (July 17, 2018). "Strongmen Hitler, Stalin, Marcos – a character study". INQUIRER.net USA. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  97. ^ Raymond, Walter John (1992) Dictionary of Politics: Selected American and Foreign Political and Legal Terms. ISBN 9781556180088
  98. ^ "File No. 60: A family affair". Philstar.com. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  99. ^ a b de Ynchausti, Nik (September 23, 2016). "Why has Marcos' propaganda lived on?". Esquire Magazine Philippines. Archived from the original on September 27, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  100. ^ a b Buruma, Ian (January 16, 1986). "Who Can Redeem Mother Filipinas?". The New York Review of Books. ISSN 0028-7504. Retrieved April 4, 2021.
  101. ^ Guerrero, Eileen (September 10, 1993). "Cults Began as Political Weapon, Ended Up Deifying Ferdinand Marcos With AM-Marcos Funeral".
  102. ^ Kessler, Richard John (1989). Rebellion and repression in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-04406-5. OCLC 19266663.
  103. ^ San Juan Jr., E. (1978) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064227808532787
  104. ^ Lico, Gerard (2003). Edifice Complex: Power, Myth, and Marcos State Architecture. University of Hawaii Press.
  105. ^ Navera, G.S. (2019). "Metaphorizing Martial Law: Constitutional Authoritarianism in Marcos's Rhetoric (1972–1985)". Philippine Studies. 66 (4).
  106. ^ Romero, Jose V. Jr. (2008). Philippine political economy. Quezon City, Philippines: Central Book Supply. ISBN 978-971-691-889-2. OCLC 302100329.
  107. ^ Curaming, Rommel A. Power and Knowledge in Southeast Asia: State and Scholars in Indonesia and the Philippines ISBN 9780429438196
  108. ^ McCallus, J. P. (1989): "The Myths of the New Filipino: Philippine government propaganda during the Early Years of Martial Law." Philippine Quarterly of. Culture and Society 17(2): 129–48.
  109. ^ Gerth, Jeff; Brinkley, Joel (January 23, 1986). "Marcos's Wartime Role Discredited in U.S. Files". The New York Times.
  110. ^ "File No. 60: Debunking the Marcos war myth". Vera Files. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  111. ^ "The art of deception | 31 years of amnesia".
  112. ^ Rafael, Vicente L. (April 1990). "Patronage and Pornography: Ideology and Spectatorship in the Early Marcos Years". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 32 (2): 282–304. doi:10.1017/S0010417500016492. ISSN 1475-2999. S2CID 144809573.
  113. ^ Cimatu, Frank; Santos-Doctor, Joya (January 1, 2003). "Philippines's 'Ozymandias's still haunts". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved February 27, 2015.
  114. ^ "Philippine government faces backlash amid claims it is trying to whitewash history of late dictator Marcos". The Straits Times. September 12, 2016.
  115. ^ Villamor, Felipe (November 8, 2016). "Philippines Can Give Hero's Burial to Ferdinand Marcos, High Court Rules". The New York Times.
  116. ^ "A Manual for Historical Revisionists". Esquiremag.ph.
  117. ^ "Martial law and historical revisionism: A holistic understanding". April 30, 2016.
  118. ^ a b c Tucker, Robert (1979). "The Rise of Stalin's Personality Cult" (PDF). The American Historical Review. 84 (2): 347–366. doi:10.2307/1855137. JSTOR 1855137. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 27, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
  119. ^ a b c Pisch, Anita (2016). The Personality Cult of Stalin in Soviet Posters, 1929–1953. Australia: ANU Press. pp. 87–190. ISBN 978-1760460624.
  120. ^ Kotkin, Stephen (1995). "Review of Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives". The Russian Review. 54 (4): 635–637. doi:10.2307/131639. ISSN 0036-0341. JSTOR 131639.
  121. ^ Gill 1980.
  122. ^ a b Gunther 1936, pp. 516–517, 530–532, 534–535.
  123. ^ "Joseph Stalin's Cult Of Personality". History Collection. March 21, 2017.
  124. ^ Kelly 2005, pp. 206–207.
  125. ^ Gruber, Haugbolle, Christiane, Sune; Heidemann, Stefan (2013). "3: Memory and Ideology: Images of Saladin in Syria and Iraq". Visual Culture in the Modern Middle East: Rhetoric of the Image. Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA: Indiana University Press. pp. 57–75. ISBN 978-0-253-00884-8.((cite book)): CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  126. ^ Sayfo, Omar (February 15, 2017). "From Kurdish Sultan to Pan-Arab Champion and Muslim Hero: The Evolution of the Saladin Myth in Popular Arab Culture". The Journal of Popular Culture. 50 (1): 65–83. doi:10.1111/jpcu.12503. hdl:1874/361826 – via Wiley Online Library.
  127. ^ Gruber, Haugbolle, Christiane, Sune; Heidemann, Stefan (2013). "3: Memory and Ideology: Images of Saladin in Syria and Iraq". Visual Culture in the Modern Middle East: Rhetoric of the Image. Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA: Indiana University Press. pp. 67–74. ISBN 978-0-253-00884-8.((cite book)): CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  128. ^ Gruber, Haugbolle, Christiane, Sune; Heidemann, Stefan (2013). "3: Memory and Ideology: Images of Saladin in Syria and Iraq". Visual Culture in the Modern Middle East: Rhetoric of the Image. Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA: Indiana University Press. pp. 79–80. ISBN 978-0-253-00884-8.((cite book)): CS1 maint: location (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  129. ^ Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–199. ISBN 0691088454.
  130. ^ Morrison, Terry; Conaway, Wayne A. (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443.
  131. ^ Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 9780415441636.
  132. ^ "İhbar Web". İhbar Web. Retrieved September 17, 2013.
  133. ^ Touraj Atabaki; Erik J. Zurcher (2004). Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization Under Atatürk and Reza Shah. I.B. Tauris. p. 4. ISBN 9781860644269. Retrieved June 21, 2013. ...and in Ataturk's case the cult of personality began early with ...
  134. ^ M. Hakan Yavuz (2009). Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780521888783. Retrieved June 21, 2013. In other works there is a deeply internalized notion of Ataturk as the "father" of the Turks, and all politicians are very much measured against his cult of personality.
  135. ^ Carter V. Findley (2010). Turkey, Islam, Nationalism, and Modernity: A History, 1789–2007. Yale University Press. pp. 467–. ISBN 9780300152609. Retrieved June 21, 2013.
  136. ^ Alexander Christie-Miller (April 20, 2013). "Lookalike keeps alive the cult of Ataturk". The Times of London.


Further reading