((Short description|False or misleading information presented as real))
((About|a general discussion of false or misleading information presented as news|the online type and the websites that specialize in it|Fake news website|other uses))
((pp-semi-indef|small=yes))
((Use mdy dates|date=March 2022))
((very long|words=18,300|date=January 2024))
[[File:The fin de siècle newspaper proprietor (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|alt=Three running men carrying papers with the labels "Humbug News", "Fake News", and "Cheap Sensation".|Reporters with various forms of "fake news" from an 1894 illustration by [[Frederick Burr Opper]]]]

'''Fake news''' or '''information disorder''' is false or misleading information (misinformation, including [[disinformation]], [[propaganda]], and [[hoaxes]]) presented as [[news]]. Fake news often has the aim of [[defamation|damaging the reputation of a person or entity]], or making money through [[advertising]] revenue.<ref name=Guardian12.17.16>((Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/18/what-is-fake-news-pizzagate|title=What is fake news? How to spot it and what you can do to stop it|last=Hunt|first=Elle|date=December 17, 2016|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref name=USNewsWR>Schlesinger, Robert (April 14, 2017). [https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson-street/articles/2017-04-14/what-is-fake-news-maybe-not-what-you-think "Fake news in reality"]. ''[[U.S. News & World Report]]''.</ref> Although false news has always been spread throughout history, the term ''fake news'' was first used in the 1890s when sensational reports in newspapers were common.<ref name="webster">((Cite web |title=The Real Story of 'Fake News' |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/the-real-story-of-fake-news |access-date=2024-03-21 |website=[[Merriam-Webster]]))</ref><ref name="politico">((cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/fake-news-history-long-violent-214535/|title=The long and brutal history of fake news|last=Soll |first=Jacob |website = Politico Magazine|language=en|access-date=March 25, 2019|date=December 18, 2016))</ref> Nevertheless, the term does not have a fixed definition and has been applied broadly to any type of false information presented as news. It has also been used by high-profile people to apply to any news unfavorable to them. Further, [[disinformation]] involves spreading false information with harmful intent and is sometimes generated and propagated by hostile foreign actors, particularly [[Foreign electoral intervention|during elections]]. In some definitions, fake news includes [[Satire|satirical]] articles misinterpreted as genuine, and articles that employ [[sensationalist]] or [[clickbait]] [[headline]]s that are not supported in the text.<ref name=Guardian12.17.16/> Because of this diversity of types of false news, researchers are beginning to favour information disorder as a more neutral and informative term.

The prevalence of fake news has increased with the recent rise of [[social media]], especially the [[Facebook News Feed]], and this misinformation is gradually seeping into the mainstream media. Several factors have been implicated in the spread of fake news, such as [[political polarization]], [[post-truth politics]], [[motivated reasoning]], [[confirmation bias]], and social media [[algorithm]]s.<ref name=Guardian12.17.16/><ref>((Cite journal|last=Himma-Kadakas|first=Marju|date=July 2017|title=Alternative facts and fake news entering journalistic content production cycle|journal=Cosmopolitan Civil Societies|volume=9| issue=2|pages=25–41 |doi=10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5469 |doi-access=free))</ref><ref name="wired.com"/><ref name=Guardian11.11.16>((Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/29/facebook-fake-news-problem-experts-pitch-ideas-algorithms|title=How to solve Facebook's fake news problem: Experts pitch their ideas|last=Woolf|first=Nicky|date=November 11, 2016 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref>((cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/05/09/fake-news-donald-trump-journalism-video-audio-facebook-twitter-column/590006002/|title=5 reasons why 'fake news' likely will get even worse|author=Borney, Nathan|date=May 9, 2018|access-date=February 17, 2019|newspaper=USA Today))</ref>

Fake news can reduce the impact of real news by competing with it. For example, a [[BuzzFeed News|''BuzzFeed News'']] analysis found that the top fake news stories about the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]] received more engagement on [[Facebook]] than top stories from major media outlets.<ref name="Silverman_11/16/2016" /> It also particularly has the potential to undermine trust in serious media coverage. The term has at times been used to cast doubt upon credible news, and former U.S. president [[Donald Trump]] has been credited with popularizing the term by using it to describe any negative press coverage of himself. It has been increasingly criticized, due in part to Trump's misuse, with the British government deciding to avoid the term, as it is "poorly-defined" and "conflates a variety of false information, from genuine error through to foreign interference".<ref>((Cite report |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1630/163002.htm |title=Disinformation and 'fake news': Interim Report: Government Response to the Committee's Fifth Report |date=9 October 2018 |publisher=[[Parliament of the United Kingdom]] |access-date=21 March 2024))</ref>

Multiple strategies for fighting fake news are currently being actively researched, for various types of fake news. Politicians in certain autocratic and democratic countries have demanded effective self-regulation and legally-enforced regulation in varying forms, of social media and web search engines.

On an individual scale, the ability to actively confront false narratives, as well as taking care when sharing information can reduce the prevalence of falsified information. However, it has been noted that this is vulnerable to the effects of [[confirmation bias]], [[motivated reasoning]] and other cognitive biases that can seriously distort reasoning, particularly in dysfunctional and polarised societies. [[Inoculation theory]] has been proposed as a method to render individuals resistant to undesirable narratives. Because new misinformation pops up all the time, it is much better timewise to inoculate the population against accepting fake news in general (a process termed [[prebunking|''prebunking'']]), instead of continually debunking the same repeated lies.

((TOC limit|3))

== Defining fake news ==

Fake news is false or misleading information presented as [[news]].<ref name="wired.com">((cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-issue-tech-turmoil-new-censorship?CNDID=50121752|title=It's the (democracy-poisoning) golden age of free speech|magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]|author=Tufekci, Zeynep|date=January 16, 2018))</ref><ref name="NYT-20170623"/> The term as it developed in 2017 is a [[neologism]] (a new or re-purposed expression that is entering the language, driven by culture or technology changes).<ref name="NYTneo">((cite news |last1 = Ember | first1 = Sydney | last2 = Mihailidis | first2 = Paul |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/education/edlife/fake-news-and-media-literacy.html|title=This is not fake news (but don't go by the headline)|date=April 3, 2017|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|quote=Fake news – a neologism to describe stories that are just not true, like [[Pizzagate]], and a term now co-opted to characterize unfavorable news – has given new urgency to the teaching of media literacy))</ref> ''Fake news'' is now used by many people as a catch-all, referring to any lies and misrepresentations, from a news distributor or not; further, a few people use the term to condemn creditable news sources they do not like, without otherwise arguing details.

Fake news stories in the old sense, plus misleading headlines, are presented among other stories by news aggregators or political sites, for financial or political gain. There are also [[fake news websites]] which run only stories that have no basis in fact but are presented as being factually accurate.<ref name=":03"/> Some satirical sites openly label themselves as fake news or satire, or they may reveal that they are fake only on closer inspection for clues.

Overlapping terms are [[bullshit|''bullshit'']], ''hoax news'', ''pseudo-news'', ''alternative facts'', ''false news'' and ''junk news''.<ref>((citation|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/12/08/facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-says-people-dont-want-hoax-news-really/|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|date=December 8, 2016|title=Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg says people don't want 'hoax' news. Really?|first=Erik|last=Wemple))</ref>

The [[National Endowment for Democracy]] defines fake news as "[M]isleading content found on the internet, especially on social media [...] Much of this content is produced by for-profit websites and Facebook pages gaming the platform for advertising revenue" and distinguishes it from disinformation: "[F]ake news does not meet the definition of disinformation or propaganda. Its motives are usually financial, not political, and it is usually not tied to a larger agenda."<ref name=ned>((citation|first=Dean|last=Jackson|title= Distinguishing disinformation from propaganda, misinformation, and "fake news"|year=2018|publisher=[[National Endowment for Democracy]]|url=https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Distinguishing-Disinformation-from-Propaganda.pdf))</ref>

Media scholar [[Nolan Higdon]] has defined fake news as "false or misleading content presented as news and communicated in formats spanning spoken, written, printed, electronic, and digital communication". Higdon has also argued that the definition of fake news has been applied too narrowly to select mediums and political ideologies.<ref name=Higdon>((cite book | title = The anatomy of fake news: A critical news literacy education |last = Higdon | first = Nolan | publisher = University of California Press | date = 2020 | isbn = 9780520347878))</ref>

While most definitions focus strictly on content accuracy and format, current research indicates that the rhetorical structure of the content might play a significant role in the perception of fake news.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Beisecker |first1=Sven |last2=Schlereth |first2=Christian |last3=Hein |first3=Sebastian |date=2022-08-11 |title=Shades of fake news: how fallacies influence consumers' perception |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2110000 |journal=European Journal of Information Systems |volume=33 |pages=41–60 |doi=10.1080/0960085X.2022.2110000 |s2cid=251529175 |issn=0960-085X))</ref>

Michael Radutzky, a producer of CBS ''[[60 Minutes]]'', said his show considers fake news to be "stories that are probably false, have enormous traction [popular appeal] in the culture, and are consumed by millions of people." These stories are not only found in politics, but also in areas like vaccination, stock values and nutrition.<ref name="lazer">((cite journal |last1=Lazer |first1=David M. J. |last2=Baum |first2=Matthew A. |last3=Benkler |first3=Yochai |last4=Berinsky |first4=Adam J. |last5=Greenhill |first5=Kelly M. |last6=Menczer |first6=Filippo |last7=Metzger |first7=Miriam J. |last8=Nyhan |first8=Brendan |last9=Pennycook |first9=Gordon |last10=Rothschild |first10=David |last11=Schudson |first11=Michael |last12=Sloman |first12=Steven A. |last13=Sunstein |first13=Cass R. |last14=Thorson |first14=Emily A. |last15=Watts |first15=Duncan J. |last16=Zittrain |first16=Jonathan L. |title=The science of fake news |journal=Science |date=March 9, 2018 |volume=359 |issue=6380 |pages=1094–1096 |doi=10.1126/science.aao2998 |pmid=29590025 |arxiv=2307.07903 |bibcode=2018Sci...359.1094L |s2cid=4410672 ))</ref> He did not include news that is "invoked by politicians against the media for stories that they don't like or for comments that they don't like" as fake news. Guy Campanile, also a ''60 Minutes'' producer said, "What we are talking about are stories that are fabricated out of thin air. By most measures, deliberately, and by any definition, that's a lie."<ref name=60Overtime >((cite video|url= http://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-fake-news-60-minutes-producers-investigate/|title= 60 Minutes overtime: What's "fake news"? 60 Minutes producers investigate | publisher=[[CBS News]] |date= March 26, 2017|access-date= March 27, 2017))</ref>

The intent and purpose of fake news is important. In some cases, fake news may be [[news satire]], which uses exaggeration and introduces non-factual elements that are intended to amuse or make a point, rather than to deceive. [[Propaganda]] can also be fake news.<ref name=Guardian12.17.16/><ref>((cite news |last1=Apple |first1=Charles |title=Fake news: What is it? |url=https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/apr/20/fake-news-what-it/ |access-date=March 7, 2021 |work=[[The Spokesman-Review]] |date=April 20, 2020 |language=en))</ref>

In the context of the United States of America and its election processes in the 2010s, fake news generated considerable controversy and argument, with some commentators defining concern over it as [[moral panic]] or [[mass hysteria]] and others worried about damage done to public trust.<ref>((cite news|last1= Shafer|first1= Jack|title= The cure for fake news is worse than the disease |url= http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/the-cure-for-fake-news-is-worse-than-the-disease-214477|access-date= February 19, 2017|newspaper= [[Politico]]|date= November 22, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite magazine|last1= Gobry|first1= Pascal-Emmanuel|title= The crushing anxiety behind the media's fake news hysteria|url= http://theweek.com/articles/666395/crushing-anxiety-behind-medias-fake-news-hysteria|access-date= February 19, 2017|magazine=[[The Week]] |date= December 12, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite journal |last1=Carlson |first1=Matt |title=Fake news as an informational moral panic: the symbolic deviancy of social media during the 2016 US presidential election |journal=Information, Communication & Society |date=August 2018 |pages=374–388 |doi=10.1080/1369118X.2018.1505934 |volume=23|issue=3 |s2cid=149496585 ))</ref> It particularly has the potential to undermine trust in serious media coverage generally.<ref>((citation |url=http://www.univision.com/noticias/america-latina/el-millonario-negocio-detras-de-los-sitios-de-fake-news-en-mexico |title=Millonario negocio FAKE NEWS |first=Carlos |last = Merlo |journal=Univision Noticias |year=2017))</ref> The term has also been used to cast doubt upon credible mainstream media.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Mihailidis |first1=Paul |last2=Viotty |first2=Samantha |title=Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in 'post-fact' society |journal=American Behavioral Scientist |date=April 2017 |volume=61 |issue=4 |pages=441–454 |doi=10.1177/0002764217701217 |s2cid=151950124 ))</ref><ref>((cite journal |last1=Habgood-Coote |first1=Joshua |title=Stop talking about fake news! |journal=Inquiry |date=November 26, 2019 |volume=62 |issue=9–10 |pages=1033–1065 |doi=10.1080/0020174x.2018.1508363 |hdl=1983/96ab36c8-e90d-42e5-9e5f-5bf2ea877ce0 |s2cid=171722153 |url=https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/96ab36c8-e90d-42e5-9e5f-5bf2ea877ce0 |hdl-access=free ))</ref>

In January 2017, the United Kingdom [[House of Commons]] commenced a [[parliamentary inquiry]] into the "growing phenomenon of fake news".<ref>((cite news|url= https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38790254
|title= Fake news inquiry by MPs examines threat to democracy |work= [[BBC News]]|date= January 30, 2017
))</ref>

In 2016, [[PolitiFact]] selected fake news as their Lie of the Year. No single lie stood out, so the generic term was chosen. Also in 2016, Oxford Dictionaries selected [[post-truth|''post-truth'']] as its word of the year and defined it as the state of affairs when "objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief."<ref name = lie2016/>

=== Roots ===

((Main|Media pluralism))
[[File:The_roots_of_'fake_news'.png|thumb|The roots of "fake news" from UNESCO's World Trends Report<ref name = unesco/>]]

The term ''fake news'' gained importance with the electoral context in Western Europe and North America. It is determined by [[fraud]]ulent content in news format and its velocity.<ref name = unesco>((Cite book|title=World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development Global Report 2017/2018|publisher=UNESCO|year=2018|url=http://www.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?catno=261065&set=005B2B7D1D_3_314&gp=1&lin=1&ll=1|page=202))</ref> According to Bounegru, Gray, Venturini and Mauri, a lie becomes fake news when it "is picked up by dozens of other [[blog]]s, retransmitted by hundreds of websites, cross-posted over thousands of social media accounts and read by hundreds of thousands".<ref>((cite book |last1=Bounegru |first1=Liliana |last2=Gray |first2=Jonathan |last3=Venturini |first3=Tommaso |last4=Mauri |first4=Michele |date=January 8, 2018|title=A field guide to "fake news" and other information disorders |url=http://fakenews.publicdatalab.org/ |location=Amsterdam |publisher=Public Data Lab |page=62))</ref>

The evolving nature of online business models encourages the production of information that is "click-worthy" and independent of its accuracy.<ref>Byrne, Andrew. 2016. [https://www.ft.com/content/333fe6bc-c1ea-11e6-81c2-f57d90f6741a "Macedonia's fake news industry sets sights on Europe"]. ''Financial Times''.</ref>

The nature of trust depends on the assumptions that non-institutional forms of communication are freer from power and more able to report information that [[mainstream media]] are perceived as unable or unwilling to reveal. Declines in confidence in much traditional media<ref>((Cite web|url=https://www.edelman.com/trust|title=Why we study Trust|website=Edelman|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref> and expert knowledge<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/08/blaming-fake-news-not-the-answer-democracy-crisis|title=Democracy is in crisis, but blaming fake news is not the answer &#124; Evgeny Morozov|date=January 8, 2017|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref> have created fertile grounds for alternative, and often obscure sources of information to appear as authoritative and credible. This ultimately leaves users confused about basic facts.<ref name = pew1/>

=== Popularity and viral spread ===
Fake news has become popular with various media outlets and platforms. Researchers at [[Pew Research Center]] discovered that over 60% of Americans access news through social media compared to traditional newspaper and magazines.<ref name = pew2/> With the popularity of social media, individuals can easily access fake news and disinformation. The rapid spread of false stories on social media during the 2012 elections in Italy has been documented, as has diffusion of false stories on Facebook during the 2016 US election campaign.<ref name="Zhuravskaya">((cite journal |last1=Zhuravskaya |first1=Ekaterina |last2=Petrova |first2=Maria |last3=Enikolopov |first3=Ruben |title=Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media |journal=Annual Review of Economics |date=2 August 2020 |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=415–438 |doi=10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 |language=en |issn=1941-1383|doi-access=free ))</ref>

Fake news has the tendency to become viral among the public. With the presence of social media platforms like [[Twitter]], it becomes easier for false information to diffuse quickly. Research has found that false political information tends to spread three times faster than other false news.<ref name="vosoughi">((cite journal |last1=Vosoughi |first1=Soroush |last2=Roy |first2=Deb |last3=Aral |first3=Sinan |date=2019 |title=The spread of true and false news online. |journal=Science |volume=359 |issue=6380 |pages=1146–1151 |doi=10.1126/science.aap9559 |pmid=29590045 |s2cid=4549072 |url=http://vermontcomplexsystems.org/share/papershredder/vosoughi2018a.pdf |access-date=October 18, 2020 |archive-date=April 29, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190429073158/http://vermontcomplexsystems.org/share/papershredder/vosoughi2018a.pdf |url-status=dead ))</ref> On Twitter, false tweets have a much higher chance of being retweeted than truthful tweets. More so, it is humans who are responsible for disseminating false news and information as opposed to bots and [[Click farm|click farms]]. The tendency for humans to spread false information has to do with human behavior; according to research, humans are attracted to events and information that are surprising and new, and, as a result, cause high arousal in the brain.<ref>((cite web|url=https://jonahberger.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ViralityB.pdf|title=What makes online content viral?|last=Berger|first=Jonah|date=March 5, 2019|publisher=American Marketing Association|access-date=March 5, 2019))</ref><ref>((cite journal|url=http://ilab.usc.edu/publications/doc/Itti_Baldi06nips.pdf|title=Bayesian surprise attracts human attention|last=Itti|first=Laurent|journal=Vision Research|date=2005|volume=49|issue=10|pages=1295–1306| doi=10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.007|pmid=18834898|pmc=2782645|access-date=March 5, 2019))</ref> Besides, motivated reasoning was found to play a role in the spread of fake news.<ref name=":6">((cite journal |last1=Tsang |first1=Stephanie Jean |title=Motivated fake news perception: The impact of news sources and policy support on audiences' assessment of news fakeness |journal=Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly |date=August 31, 2020 |volume=98 |issue=4 | pages=1059–1077 |doi=10.1177/1077699020952129 |s2cid=225260530 ))</ref> This ultimately leads humans to retweet or share false information, which are usually characterized with [[clickbait]] and eye-catching titles. This prevents people from stopping to verify the information. As a result, massive online communities form around a piece of false news without any prior fact-checking or verification of the veracity of the information.

Of particular concern regarding viral spread of fake news is the role of super-spreaders. [[Brian Stelter]], the anchor of ''Reliable Sources'' at [[CNN]], has documented the systematic long-term two-way feedback that developed between President Donald Trump and [[Fox News]] presenters. The resultant conditioning of outrage in their large audience against government and the mainstream media has proved a highly successful money-spinner for the TV network.<ref name = "stelter">((Citation | last=Stelter | first= Brian | title=Hoax: Donald Trump, Fox News, and the dangerous distortion of the truth | publisher = One Signal Publishers / Simon & Schuster | year=2021 | isbn = 9781982142452 ))</ref>

=== Its damaging effects ===
In 2017, the inventor of the [[World Wide Web]], [[Tim Berners-Lee]] claimed that fake news was one of the three most significant new disturbing Internet trends that must first be resolved if the Internet is to be capable of truly "serving humanity." The other two new disturbing trends were the recent surge in the use of the Internet by governments for citizen-surveillance purposes, and for [[cyberwarfare]] purposes.<ref>[https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/11/world-wide-webs-inventor-warns-s-peril/99005906/ The World Wide Web's inventor warns it's in peril on 28th anniversary] By Jon Swartz, ''[[USA Today]]''. March 11, 2017. Retrieved March 11, 2017.</ref>

Author [[Terry Pratchett]], previously a journalist and press officer, was among the first to be concerned about the spread of fake news on the Internet. In a 1995 interview with [[Bill Gates]], founder of [[Microsoft]], he said, "Let's say I call myself the Institute for Something-or-other and I decide to promote a spurious treatise saying the Jews were entirely responsible for the Second World War, and [[the Holocaust]] didn't happen, and it goes out there on the Internet and is available on the same terms as any piece of historical research which has undergone [[peer review]] and so on. There's a kind of parity of esteem of information on the net. It's all there: there's no way of finding out whether this stuff has any bottom to it or whether someone has just made it up". Gates was optimistic and disagreed, saying that authorities on the Internet would index and check facts and reputations in a much more sophisticated way than in print. But it was Pratchett who more accurately predicted how the Internet would propagate and legitimize fake news.<ref>((cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/may/30/terry-pratchett-predicted-rise-of-fake-news-in-1995-says-biographer |title=Terry Pratchett predicted rise of fake news in 1995, says biographer |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |first=Alison |last=Flood |date= May 30, 2019))</ref>

When the Internet first became accessible for public use in the 1990s, its main purpose was for the seeking and accessing of information.<ref>((cite book |last1=Burkhardt |first1=Joanna M. |title=Combatting fake news in the digital age |date=2017 |publisher=American Library Association |isbn=978-0-8389-5991-6 |url=https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/issue/viewFile/662/423 ))</ref> As fake news was introduced to the Internet, this made it difficult for some people to find truthful information. The impact of fake news has become a worldwide phenomenon.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/02/fake-news-facebook-us-election-around-the-world|title=Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem|last1=Connolly|first1=Kate|date=December 2, 2016|last2=Chrisafis|first2=Angelique|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |last3=McPherson|first3=Poppy|last4=Kirchgaessner| first4=Stephanie|last5=Haas|first5=Benjamin|last6=Phillips|first6=Dominic|last7=Hunt|first7=Elle|last8=Safi|first8=Michael|access-date=January 17, 2017))</ref> Fake news is often spread through the use of [[fake news website]]s, which, in order to gain credibility, specialize in creating attention-grabbing news, which often [[Website spoofing|impersonate]] well-known news sources.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html|title=The Agency|last=Chen|first=Adrian|date=June 2, 2015|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=December 25, 2016))</ref><ref name="snopesfieldguide">((cite web |last=LaCapria|first=Kim|title=Snopes' field guide to fake news sites and hoax purveyors – Snopes.com's updated guide to the Internet's clickbaiting, news-faking, social media exploiting dark side |date=November 2, 2016|url=http://www.snopes.com/2016/01/14/fake-news-sites/|website=[[Snopes.com]]|access-date=November 19, 2016))</ref><ref name="bengilbert">((cite web |title=Fed up with fake news, Facebook users are solving the problem with a simple list|date=November 15, 2016|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-users-crowdsource-fake-news-document-2016-11|quote=Some of these sites are intended to look like real publications (there are false versions of major outlets like ABC and MSNBC) but share only fake news; others are straight-up propaganda created by foreign nations (Russia, for example)|first=Ben|last=Gilbert|website=[[Business Insider]]|access-date=November 16, 2016))</ref> Jestin Coler, who said he does it for "fun",<ref name=60Overtime /> has indicated that he earned US$10,000 per month from advertising on his fake news websites.<ref name=60Minutes />

Research has shown that fake news hurts social media and online based outlets far worse than traditional print and TV outlets. After a survey was conducted, it was found that 58% of people had less trust in social media news stories as opposed to 24% of people in mainstream media after learning about fake news.<ref name="auto8">((Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-media-fakenews/fake-news-hurts-trust-in-media-mainstream-outlets-fare-better-poll-idUSKBN1D002S|title=Fake news hurts trust in media, mainstream outlets fare better: Poll|date=October 31, 2017|newspaper=Reuters|language=en|access-date=April 10, 2018))</ref> In 2019 [[Christine Michel Carter]], a writer who has reported on [[Generation Alpha]] for ''Forbes'' stated that one-third of the generation can decipher false or misleading information in the media.<ref>((Cite web |last=Carter |first=Christine Michel |title=How Consumer Brands- And America- Can Prepare Themselves For Generation Alpha |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/christinecarter/2019/12/09/how-consumer-brandsand-americacan-prepare-themselves-for-generation-alpha/ |access-date=2023-06-20 |website=Forbes |language=en))</ref>

== Types of fake news ==
Claire Wardle of ''[[First Draft News]]'', has identified seven types of fake news:<ref>((cite web|author= Wardle, Claire|title= Fake news. It's complicated|url= https://firstdraftnews.org/fake-news-complicated/|publisher= firstdraftnews.org|date= February 16, 2017|access-date= April 22, 2017))</ref>

((multiple image
 | align = right
 | direction = vertical
 | footer = Manipulated content: an intentionally deceptive photoshopped image of [[Hillary Clinton]] over a 1977 photo of [[Peoples Temple]] cult leader [[Jim Jones]]
 | image1 = Bad example of frame grab.jpg
 | width = 190
 | image2 = Rev. Jim Jones, 1977 (cropped).jpg))

# satire or parody ("no intention to cause harm but has potential to fool")
# false connection ("when headlines, visuals or captions don't support the content")
# misleading content ("misleading use of information to [[Spin (public relations)|frame an issue]] or an individual")
# false context ("when genuine content is shared with false contextual information")
# impostor content ("when genuine sources are impersonated" with false, made-up sources)
# manipulated content ("when genuine information or imagery is manipulated to deceive", as with a "doctored" photo)
# fabricated content ("new content is 100% false, designed to deceive and do harm")
[[Scientific denialism]] is another potential explanatory type of fake news, defined as the act of producing false or misleading facts to unconsciously support strong pre-existing beliefs.<ref>((Cite journal|doi = 10.1136/bmj.c6950|title = How the growth of denialism undermines public health|year = 2010|last1 = McKee|first1 = M.|last2 = Diethelm|first2 = P.|journal = BMJ|volume = 341|pages = c6950|pmid = 21156741|s2cid = 35789525|url = https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1874/1/How%20the%20growth%20of%20denialism%20undermines%20public%20health%20_%20The%20BMJ.pdf))</ref>

== Criticism of the term ==

In 2017, Wardle announced she has now rejected the phrase ''fake news'' and "censors it in conversation", finding it "woefully inadequate" to describe the issues. She now speaks of ''information disorder'' and ''information pollution'', and distinguishes between three overarching types of information content problems:<ref>((cite news |last=Giuliani-Hoffman |first=Francesca |date=November 3, 2017 |title='F*** News' should be replaced by these words, Claire Wardle says |url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/11/03/media/claire-wardle-fake-news-reliable-sources-podcast/index.html |work=Money.CNN |access-date=November 24, 2018 ))</ref>
# [[Misinformation|Mis-information]] (misinformation): false information disseminated without harmful intent.
# [[Disinformation attack|Dis-information]] (disinformation): false information created and shared by people with harmful intent.
# Mal-information (malinformation): the sharing of "genuine" information with the intent to cause harm.

[[Disinformation attack]]s are the most insidious type because of the harmful intent. For example, it is sometimes generated and propagated by hostile foreign actors, particularly [[Foreign electoral intervention|during elections]].<ref>((cite web |url=http://www.politico.eu/article/fake-news-busters-germany-ben-scott/ | last = Scott | first = Mark | title=Former Hillary Clinton aide fights fake news in Germany [Fake news busters] | date=September 15, 2017 |website = Politico | access-date=January 27, 2022))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.michigandaily.com/section/community-affairs/pseudo-local-news-sites-michigan-reveal-nationally-expanding-network|title=Pseudo local news sites reveal nationally expanding network|work=[[The Michigan Daily]]|access-date=November 8, 2019|first1=Dominick|last1=Sokotoff|first2=Katherina|last2=Sourine|language=en ))</ref>

Because of the manner in which former president Donald Trump has co-opted the term, ''[[The Washington Post]]'' media columnist [[Margaret Sullivan (journalist)|Margaret Sullivan]] has warned fellow journalists that "It's time to retire the tainted term 'fake news'. Though the term hasn't been around long, its meaning already is lost."<ref name="Gendreau_2/25/2017"/> By late 2018, the term "fake news" had become ''verboten'' and U.S. journalists, including the [[Poynter Institute]] were asking for apologies and for product retirements from companies using the term.<ref>((cite news |first1=Keith |last1=McMillan |first2=Cleve R. Jr. |last2=Wootson |title=Newseum pulls 'fake news' shirts after outcry from journalists |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/08/03/the-newseum-is-selling-fake-news-shirts-journalists-are-not-amused/ |access-date=February 16, 2019 |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=August 4, 2018 |quote=reporters reacted to the disclosure of the shirts for sale at the Newseum. Most were not amused.))</ref><ref>((cite news |first1=Daniel |last1=Funke |title=Bloomingdale's has discontinued a 'fake news' shirt. But there are still hundreds of them on Amazon |url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/bloomingdales-has-discontinued-a-fake-news-shirt-but-there-are-still-hundreds-of-them-on-amazon/ |access-date=February 14, 2019 |work=Poynter |date=February 11, 2019 |quote=Both Bloomingdale's and the Newseum stopped selling their fake news shirts after an outcry from journalists that said the merch perpetuated the same anti-press rhetoric that has been used as a threat against them. But on shopping platforms like Amazon, fake news merch is alive and well.))</ref><ref>((cite web|last=Maglio |first=Tony |url=https://www.thewrap.com/bloomingdales-apologizes-over-fake-news-t-shirt-pulls-it-from-stores/ |title=Bloomingdale's apologizes over 'fake news' t-shirt |date=February 12, 2019 |publisher=Thewrap.com |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref>

In October 2018, the British government decided that the term ''fake news'' will no longer be used in official documents because it is "a poorly-defined and misleading term that conflates a variety of false information, from genuine error through to foreign interference in democratic processes." This followed a recommendation by the [[House of Commons]]' [[Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee]] to avoid the term.<ref name="telegraphoct18">((cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/22/government-bans-phrase-fake-news/|title=Government bans phrase 'fake news'|first=Margi|last=Murphy|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|date=October 23, 2018|via=www.telegraph.co.uk))</ref>

However, recent reviews of fake news still regard it as a useful broad construct, equivalent in meaning to ''fabricated news'', as separate from related types of problematic news content, such as hyperpartisan news, the latter being a particular source of political polarization.<ref name="lazer"/><ref name = "pennycook"/> Therefore, researchers are beginning to favour ''information disorder'' as a more neutral and informative term. For example, the Commission of Inquiry by the [[Aspen Institute]] (2021) has adopted the term ''Information Disorder'' in its investigative report.<ref>((Cite web|url=https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/commission-on-information-disorder-final-report/|title=Commission on Information Disorder Final Report|date=November 15, 2021|website=www.aspeninstitute.org|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref>

== Identification ==
[[File:How to Spot Fake News.pdf|right|thumb|Infographic ''How to spot fake news'' published by the [[International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions]]]]

According to an academic library guide, a number of specific aspects of fake news may help to identify it and thus avoid being unduly influenced.<ref>((Cite web|last=Downey|first=Beth|title=Research Guides: Evaluating False News and Misinformation: Types of False News|url=https://guides.library.msstate.edu/c.php?g=672253&p=4772779|access-date=November 15, 2020|website=guides.library.msstate.edu| language=en))</ref> These include: [[clickbait]], [[propaganda]], [[satire]]/[[parody]], sloppy [[journalism]], [[misleading]] headings, [[Manipulation (psychology)|manipulation]], [[rumor]] mill, [[misinformation]], [[media bias]], [[audience bias]], and [[content farm]]s.

The [[International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions]] (IFLA) published a summary in diagram form ''(pictured at right)'' to assist people in recognizing fake news.<ref>((cite web|url=http://blogs.ifla.org/lpa/files/2017/01/How-to-Spot-Fake-News-1.jpg|title=How to spot fake news|date=January 27, 2017|publisher=IFLA blogs|access-date=February 16, 2017))</ref> Its main points are:
# Consider the source (to understand its mission and purpose)
# Read beyond the headline (to understand the whole story)
# Check the authors (to see if they are real and credible)
# Assess the supporting sources (to ensure they support the claims)
# Check the date of publication (to see if the story is relevant and up to date)
# Ask if it is a joke (to determine if it is meant to be [[satire]])
# Review your own biases (to see if they are affecting your judgment)
# Ask experts (to get confirmation from independent people with knowledge).<ref name = "spotfake">((cite web |url=https://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news/ |title=How to spot fake news |access-date=August 11, 2020 |last1=Kiely |first1=Eugene |last2=Robertson |first2=Lori |date=November 18, 2016 |work=FactCheck.org |publisher=[[University of Pennsylvania]] – Annenberg Public Policy Center))</ref>

The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), launched by the Poynter Institute in 2015, supports international collaborative efforts in fact-checking, provides training, and has published a code of principles.<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.poynter.org/fact-checkers-code-of-principles/|title=International Fact-Checking Network fact-checkers' code of principles|date=September 15, 2016|publisher=Poynter|access-date=March 25, 2017))</ref> In 2017 it introduced an application and vetting process for journalistic organisations.<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.poynter.org/about-the-international-fact-checking-network/|title=About the International Fact-Checking Network|date=December 8, 2016|publisher=Poynter|access-date=March 25, 2017))</ref> One of IFCN's verified signatories, the independent, not-for-profit media journal [[The Conversation (website)|''The Conversation'']], created a short animation explaining its fact checking process, which involves "extra checks and balances, including [[Peer review|blind peer review]] by a second academic expert, additional scrutiny and editorial oversight".<ref>((cite news|url=http://theconversation.com/how-we-do-factchecks-at-the-conversation-73134|title=How we do fact checks at The Conversation|last1=Creagh|first1=Sunanda|last2=Mountain|first2=Wes|date=February 17, 2017|work=The Conversation|access-date=March 2, 2017))</ref>

Beginning in the 2017 school year, children in Taiwan study a new curriculum designed to teach critical reading of propaganda and the evaluation of sources. Called "media literacy", the course provides training in journalism in the new information society.<ref name=Time-Smith>((cite news|url=http://time.com/4730440/taiwan-fake-news-education/|author=Smith, Nicola|date=April 6, 2017|access-date=April 17, 2017|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |title=Schoolkids in Taiwan will now be taught how to identify fake news))</ref>

=== Online identification ===
Fake news has become increasingly prevalent over the last few years, with over 100 misleading articles and rumors spread regarding the [[2016 United States presidential election]] alone.<ref name=":03">((cite journal |last1=Allcott |first1=Hunt |last2=Gentzkow |first2=Matthew |title=Social media and fake news in the 2016 Election |journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives |date=May 1, 2017 |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=211–236 |doi=10.1257/jep.31.2.211 |s2cid=32730475 |doi-access=free ))</ref> These fake news articles tend to come from satirical news websites or individual websites with an incentive to propagate false information, either as clickbait or to serve a purpose.<ref name=":03" /> Since they typically hope to intentionally promote incorrect information, such articles are quite difficult to detect.<ref name=":12">((cite journal |last1=Shu |first1=Kai |last2=Sliva |first2=Amy |last3=Wang |first3=Suhang |last4=Tang |first4=Jiliang |last5=Liu |first5=Huan |title=Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective |journal=ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter |date=September 2017 |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=22–36 |doi=10.1145/3137597.3137600 |arxiv=1708.01967 |s2cid=207718082 ))</ref>

When identifying a source of information, one must look at many attributes, including but not limited to the content of the email and social media engagements. Specifically, the language is typically more inflammatory in fake news than real articles, in part because the purpose is to confuse and generate clicks.<ref name=":12" />

Furthermore, modeling techniques such as [[n-gram]] encodings and [[Bag-of-words model|bag of words]] have served as other linguistic techniques to determine the legitimacy of a news source.<ref name=":12" /> On top of that, researchers have determined that visual-based cues also play a factor in categorizing an article, specifically some features can be designed to assess if a picture was legitimate and provides more clarity on the news.<ref name=":12" /> There is also many social context features that can play a role, as well as the model of spreading the news. Websites such as [[Snopes]] try to detect this information manually, while certain universities are trying to build mathematical models to do this themselves.<ref name=":03" />

== Tackling and suppression strategies ==
Considerable research is underway regarding strategies for confronting and suppressing fake news of all types, in particular [[disinformation]], which is the deliberate spreading of false narratives for political purposes, or for destabilising [[social cohesion]] in targeted communities. Multiple strategies need to be tailored to individual types of fake news, depending for example on whether the fake news is deliberately produced, or rather unintentionally or unconsciously produced.

Considerable [[#Resources: External links|resources]] are available to combat fake news. Regular summaries of current events and research are available on the websites and email newsletters of a number of support organisations. Particularly notable are the First Draft Archive,<ref>((Cite web | url= https://firstdraftnews.org | title = First Draft Archive))</ref> the Information Futures Lab, School of Public Health, Brown University<ref>((Cite web | url = https://sites.brown.edu/informationfutures | title = Information Futures Lab))</ref> and the Nieman Foundation for Journalism (Harvard University).<ref>((Cite web | url = https://www.niemanreports.org | title = Nieman Daily Digest))</ref>

Journalist Bernard Keane, in his book on misinformation in Australia, classifies strategies for dealing with fake news into three categories: (1) the liar (the perpetrator of fake news), (2) the conduit (the method of carriage of the fake news), and (3) the lied-to (the recipient of the fake news).<ref>((Citation | last=Keane | first= Bernard. | title = Lies and falsehoods: The Morrison government and the new culture of deceit | publisher = Hardie Grant | year = 2021 | pages=80–92 | isbn=9781743798355))</ref>

=== Strategies regarding the perpetrator ===
==== Promotion of facts over emotions ====
American philosopher of science Lee McIntyre, who has researched the scientific attitude and [[post-truth]], has explained the importance of factual basis of society, in preference to one in which emotions replace facts. One modern example is the symbiotic relationship that developed between President Donald Trump and [[Fox News]], in which the conspiracy beliefs of Fox hosts were repeated shortly after by Trump (and vice versa) in a continuous feedback loop. This served to promote outrage, and thus to condition and radicalise conservative Republican Fox listeners into cult-like Trump supporters, and to demonise and gaslight Democrat opponents, the mainstream media, and elites generally.<ref name = "stelter"/>

A key strategy to counter fake news based on emotions rather than facts is to flood the information space, particularly social media and web browser search results with factual news, thus drowning out misinformation.<ref name = "mcintyre"/> A key factor in establishing facts is the role of critical thinking, the principles of which should be imbedded more comprehensively within all school and university education courses.<ref name="harrison">((Citation | last=Harrison | first=Guy P. | title= How to repair the American mind: Solving America's cognitive crisis.| journal = Skeptical Inquirer | date = 2021 | volume=45 | issue = 3| pages = 31–34 | url = https://skepticalinquirer.org/2021/04/how-to-repair-the-american-mind-solving-americas-cognitive-crisis ))</ref> [[Critical thinking]] is a style of thinking in which citizens, prior to subsequent [[problem solving]] and [[decision-making]], have learned to pay attention to the content of written words, and to judge their accuracy and fairness, among other worthy attributes.

==== Technique rebuttal ====
Because content rebuttal (presenting true facts to refute false information) does not always work, Lee McIntyre suggests the better method of technique rebuttal, in which faulty reasoning by deniers is exposed, such as cherry-picking data, and relying too much on fake experts. Deniers have a lot of information, but a deficit of trust in mainstream sources. McIntyre first builds trust by respectful exchange, listening carefully to their explanation without interrupting. Then he asks questions such as "What evidence would make you change your mind?" and "Why do you trust that source?" McIntyre has used his technique to talk to [[flat earthers]], though he admits it may not work with hard-core deniers.<ref>((Citation | last = McIntyre | first = Lee | date = 12 August 2021 | title = Talking to science deniers and sceptics is not hopeless | journal = Nature | volume = 596 | issue = 7871 | pages = 165 | doi = 10.1038/d41586-021-02152-y | pmid = 34354267 | bibcode = 2021Natur.596..165M | s2cid = 236935483 ))</ref>

==== Individual counteraction ====
Individuals should confront misinformation when spotted in online blogs, even if briefly, otherwise they fester and proliferate. The person being responded to is probably resistant to change, but many other bloggers may read and learn from an evidence-based reply.<ref name = "mcintyre">((Citation | last = McIntyre | first= Lee | title = Post-truth (Essential Knowldege Series) | publisher = MIT Press | year = 2018 | pages = 151–172 | isbn = 978-0-262-53504-5 ))</ref> A brutal example was learned by John Kerry during the US 2004 Presidential election campaign against George W. Bush. The right-wing [[Swift Vets and POWs for Truth|Swift Boat Veterans for Truth]] falsely claimed that Kerry showed cowardice during the Vietnam War. Kerry refused to dignify the claims with a response for two weeks, despite being pummeled in the media, and this action contributed to his marginal loss to Bush. We should never assume any claim is too outrageous to be believed.<ref name = "mcintyre"/>((rp|154–155))

However, caution applies regarding over-zealous debunking of fake news. It is often unwise to draw attention to fake news published on a low-impact website or blog (one that has few followers). If this fake news is debunked by a journalist in a high-profile place such as ''[[The New York Times]]'', knowledge of the false claim [[Streisand effect|spreads widely]], and more people overall will end up believing it, ignoring or denying the debunk.((efn | name = backfire | Research is needed to establish the prevalence of this effect, as well as its relation to similar constructs: [[backfire effect]], [[Streisand effect]], [[Boomerang effect (psychology)|boomerang effect]], backlash effect, and - more broadly - [[psychological reactance]].))

==== Backfire effect ====
A widely reported paper by Brendan Nyhan and Jason Riefler in 2010 found that when persons with a firm belief are presented with corrective information, their mistaken political beliefs were reinforced rather than reduced in two of their five studies. The researchers called this a [[backfire effect]].<ref>((Citation | last1 = Nyhan | first1 = B. | last2 = Reifler | first2 = J. | date = 2010 | title = When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions | journal = Political Behavior | volume = 32 | issue = 2 | pages = 303–330 | doi = 10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 | s2cid = 10715114 ))</ref> However, this finding was widely misreported as that corrective information was the sole cause of reinforced misinformation. Later studies, including by Nyhan and colleagues, failed to support a backfire effect. Instead, Nyhan now accepts that the reinforced beliefs are largely controlled by cues from high-profile elites and media that spread misinformation.<ref>((Citation | last1 = Nyhan | first1 = Brendan | date = 2021 | title = Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions | journal = PNAS | volume = 118: e1912440117 | issue = 15 | pages = 1–7  | doi = 10.1073/pnas.1912440117 | pmid = 33837144 | pmc = 8053951 | bibcode = 2021PNAS..11812440N | doi-access = free ))</ref>

=== Strategies regarding carriers ===
==== Regulation of social media ====
Internet companies with threatened credibility have developed new responses to limit fake news and reduce financial incentives for its proliferation.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/2cf4a678-c25b-11e6-81c2-f57d90f6741a|title=Facebook begins testing ways to flag fake news|newspaper=[[Financial Times]]|date=December 15, 2016|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref><ref name = "wingfield"/>

A valid criticism of social media companies is that users are [[Filter bubble|presented with content that they will like]], based on previous viewing preferences. An undesirable side-effect is that [[confirmation bias]] is enhanced in users, which in turn enhances the acceptance of fake news. To reduce this bias, effective self-regulation and legally-enforced regulation of social media (notably Facebook and Twitter) and web search engines (notably Google) need to become more effective and innovative.<ref name = wingfield >((Citation |title = Google and Facebook take aim at fake news sites. | last1 = Wingfield | first1 = Nick | last2 = Isaac | first2 = Mike | last3 = Benner | first3 = Katie | newspaper =[[The New York Times]]. | date = November 15, 2016 | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/technology/google-will-ban-websites-that-host-fake-news-from-using-its-ad-service.html ))</ref>

Financial disincentives to tackle fake news also apply to some mainstream media. Brian Stelter, the anchor of ''Reliable Sources'' at CNN, has provided a substantial critique of the symbiotic but damaging relationship that developed between President Donald Trump and Fox News, which has proved an extraordinarily successful money-spinner for the Murdoch-owned TV network, despite it being a super-spreader of fake news.<ref name = "stelter"/>

==== General strategy ====
The general approach by these tech companies is the detection of problematic news via human fact-checking and automated artificial intelligence (machine learning, natural language processing and network analysis). Tech companies have utilized two basic counter-strategies: down-ranking fake news and warning messages.<ref name = "pennycook">((Citation | last1 = Pennycook | first1 = Gordon | last2 = Rand | first2 = David G. | title= The psychology of fake news.| journal = Trends in Cognitive Sciences | date=2021 | volume=25 | issue=5 | pages = 388–402 | doi=10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007| pmid = 33736957 | s2cid = 232234721 | doi-access = free ))</ref>

In the first approach, problematic content is down-ranked by the search algorithm, for example, to the second or later pages on a Google search, so that users are less likely to see it (most users just scan the first page of search results). However, two problems arise. One is that truth is not black-and-white, and fact-checkers often disagree on how to classify the content included in computer training sets, running the risk of false positives and unjustified censorship. Also, fake news often evolves rapidly, and therefore identifiers of misinformation may be ineffective in the future.<ref name="pennycook"/>

The second approach involves attaching warnings to content that professional fact-checkers have found to be false. Much evidence indicates that corrections and warnings do produce reduced misperceptions and sharing. Despite some early evidence that fact-checking could backfire, recent research has shown that these backfire effects are extremely uncommon. But an important problem is that professional fact-checking is not scalable – it can take substantial time and effort to investigate each particular claim. Thus, many (if not most) false claims never get fact-checked. Also, the process is slow, and a warning may miss the period of peak viral spreading. Further, warnings are typically only attached to blatantly false news, rather than to biased coverage of events that actually occurred.<ref name="pennycook"/>

A third approach is to place more emphasis on reliable sources such as [[Wikipedia]], as well as mainstream media (for example, ''[[The New York Times]]'' and ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''), and science communication publications (for example, [[Scientific American|''Scientific American'']] and [[The Conversation (website)|''The Conversation'']]). However, this approach has led to mixed results, as hyperpartisan commentary and [[confirmation bias]] is found even in these sources (the media has both news and opinion pages). In addition, some sections of the community completely reject scientific commentary.<ref name="pennycook"/>

A fourth approach is to ban or specifically target so-called super-spreaders of fake news from social media.<ref name = "stelter"/>

==== Fact-checking ====
During the 2016 United States presidential election, the creation and [[Fake news websites in the United States|coverage of fake news]] increased substantially.<ref name = lie2016>((cite news|url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/dec/13/2016-lie-year-fake-news/|title=2016 Lie of the Year: Fake news|last=Holan|first=Angie Drobnic|date=December 13, 2016|work=[[PolitiFact.com]]))</ref> This resulted in a widespread [[Fake news website#Response|response]] to combat the spread of fake news.<ref name=Snopes>((cite web|url=http://www.snopes.com/2016/01/14/fake-news-sites/|title=Snopes' field guide to fake news sites and hoax purveyors|last=LaCapria|first=Kim|date=March 2, 2017|website=[[Snopes.com]]))</ref><ref name=Forbes>((cite magazine|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2017/03/01/fake-news-how-big-data-and-ai-can-help/|title=Fake News: How Big Data And AI Can Help|last=Marr|first=Bernard|date=March 1, 2017|magazine=[[Forbes]]))</ref><ref name = NYTimes>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/technology/google-facebook-fake-news.html|title=In race against fake news, Google and Facebook stroll to the starting line|last=Wakabayashi|first=Isaac|date=January 25, 2017|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]))</ref> The volume and reluctance of fake news websites to respond to fact-checking organizations has posed a problem to inhibiting the spread of fake news through fact checking alone.<ref>((cite news|url=http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2017/jan/27/fact-checking-fake-news-reveals-how-hard-it-kill-p/|title=Fact-checking fake news reveals how hard it is to kill pervasive 'nasty weed' online|last=Gillin|first=Joshua|date=January 27, 2017|work=[[PolitiFact.com]]))</ref> In an effort to reduce the effects of fake news, fact-checking websites, including [[Snopes.com]] and [[FactCheck.org]], have posted guides to spotting and avoiding fake news websites.<ref name=Snopes/><ref name = "spotfake"/> Social media sites and search engines, such as [[Facebook]] and [[Google]], received criticism for facilitating the spread of fake news. Both of these corporations have taken measures to explicitly prevent the spread of fake news; critics, however, believe more action is needed.<ref name=NYTimes/>

==== Facebook ====
After the 2016 American election and the run-up to the German election, Facebook began labeling and warning of inaccurate news<ref name="auto1">((cite web|url=https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/15/media/facebook-fake-news-warning-labels-germany/index.html|title=Facebook to begin warning users of fake news before German election|last=Stelter|first=Brian|date=January 15, 2017|publisher=[[CNNMoney]] |access-date=January 17, 2017))</ref><ref name="auto2">((Cite news|url=http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/clamping-down-on-viral-fake-news-facebook-partners-with-sites-like-snopes-and-adds-new-user-reporting/|title=Clamping down on viral fake news, Facebook partners with sites like Snopes and adds new user reporting |publisher=[[Nieman Foundation for Journalism]] |access-date=January 17, 2017))</ref> and partnered with independent [[Fact checking|fact-checkers]] to label inaccurate news, warning readers before sharing it.<ref name="auto1" /><ref name="auto2" /> After a story is flagged as disputed, it will be reviewed by the third-party fact-checkers. Then, if it has been proven to be a fake news story, the post cannot be turned into an ad or promoted.<ref>((cite magazine |last1=Chowdhry|first1=Amit|title=Facebook launches a new tool that combats fake news|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2017/03/05/facebook-fake-news-tool/|magazine=[[Forbes]] | date = March 5, 2017))</ref> Artificial intelligence is one of the more recent technologies being developed in the United States and Europe to recognize and eliminate fake news through algorithms.<ref name="Forbes" /> In 2017, Facebook targeted 30,000 accounts related to the spread of misinformation regarding the [[2017 French presidential election|French presidential election]].<ref>((cite news|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/facebook-targets-30000-fake-france-accounts-election-46793944|title=Facebook targets 30,000 fake France accounts before election|work=[[ABC News]]|date=April 14, 2017))</ref>

In 2020, during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], Facebook found that [[troll farm]]s from [[North Macedonia]] and the [[Philippines]] pushed coronavirus disinformation. The publishers that used contents from these farms were banned from the platform.<ref>((cite news |title=Troll farms from North Macedonia and the Philippines pushed coronavirus disinformation on Facebook|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/troll-farms-macedonia-philippines-pushed-coronavirus-disinformation-facebook-n1218376|publisher=nbcnews |date=May 20, 2020))</ref>

==== Google ====
In March 2018, [[Google]] launched [[Google News Initiative]] (GNI) to fight the spread of fake news. It launched GNI under the belief that quality [[journalism]] and identifying truth online is crucial. GNI has three goals: "to elevate and strengthen quality journalism, evolve business models to drive sustainable growth and empower news organizations through technological innovation".<ref name=":1">((Cite news|url=https://www.engadget.com/2018/03/20/google-300-million-towards-fighting-fake-news/|title=Google puts $300 million towards fighting fake news|work=Engadget|access-date=May 30, 2018|language=en-US))</ref> To achieve the first goal, Google created the Disinfo Lab, which combats the spread of fake news during crucial times such as elections or breaking news. The company is also working to adjust its systems to display more trustworthy content during times of breaking news. To make it easier for users to subscribe to media publishers, Google created Subscribe with Google. Additionally, they have created a dashboard, News Consumer Insights that allows news organizations to better understand their audiences using data and analytics. Google will spend $300 million through 2021 on these efforts, among others, to combat fake news.<ref name=":1" />

In November 2020, [[YouTube]] (owned by Google) suspended news outlet [[One America News Network]] (OANN) for a week for spreading misinformation on coronavirus. The outlet has violated YouTube's policy multiple times. A video that falsely promoted a guaranteed cure to the virus has been deleted from the channel.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/nov/24/oann-suspended-youtube-cure-covid-19  |title= OANN suspended from YouTube after promoting a sham cure for Covid-19 |access-date=November 24, 2020|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|date= November 24, 2020 ))</ref>

==== Legal and criminal sanctions in general ====
The use of anonymously hosted [[fake news website]]s has made it difficult to prosecute sources of fake news for [[libel]].<ref name="wired.com"/><ref>((Cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/05/opinions/suing-fake-news-not-so-fast-callan/index.html|title=Sue over fake news? Not so fast|last=Callan|first=Paul|publisher=CNN|access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref>

Numerous countries have created laws in an attempt to regulate or prosecute harmful misinformation more generally than just with a focus on tech companies. In numerous countries, people have been arrested for allegedly spreading [[COVID-19 misinformation|fake news about the COVID-19 pandemic]].((efn | name = bans | People have been arrested for allegedly spreading fake news about the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>((cite news |title=Coronavirus sends Asia's social media censors into overdrive |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-fakenews/coronavirus-sends-asias-social-media-censors-into-overdrive-idUSKBN1ZY1AC |work=Reuters |date=February 4, 2020))</ref><ref name="straitstimes"/> Some examples: In the [[Philippines]],<ref>((cite news |title=The Philippines coronavirus lockdown is becoming a crackdown |url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/the-philippines-coronavirus-lockdown-is-becoming-a-crackdown/ |work=The Diplomat |date=April 3, 2020))</ref> [[China]],<ref>((cite news |title=China Is using fears of online misinformation about the coronavirus to arrest people |url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/china-is-arresting-people-for-spreading-rumors-online-about |work=BuzzFeed News |date=January 29, 2020))</ref> [[India]],<ref>((cite news |title=Fake news, real arrests |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/17/fake-news-real-arrests/|work=Foreign Policy |date=April 17, 2020))</ref><ref name="straitstimes"/> [[Egypt]],<ref>((cite news |title=Reporting on the coronavirus: Egypt muzzles critical journalists |url=https://www.dw.com/en/reporting-on-the-coronavirus-egypt-muzzles-critical-journalists/a-53009293 |work=Deutsche Welle |date=April 3, 2020))</ref> [[Bangladesh]],<ref>((cite news |title=Bangladesh: End wave of COVID-19 'rumor' arrests |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/31/bangladesh-end-wave-covid-19-rumor-arrests |work=Human Rights Watch |date=March 31, 2020))</ref> [[Morocco]],<ref>((cite news |title=Morocco makes a dozen arrests over coronavirus fake news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-morocco/morocco-makes-a-dozen-arrests-over-coronavirus-fake-news-idUSKBN2162DI |work=Reuters |date=March 19, 2020))</ref> [[Pakistan]],<ref>((cite news |title=Man arrested for spreading fake news on coronavirus |url=https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/03/25/man-arrested-in-lahore-for-spreading-fake-news-on-coronavirus/ |work=Pakistan Today |date=March 25, 2020))</ref> [[Saudi Arabia]],<ref>((cite news |title=Saudi man arrested for false news on COVID-19 patient |url=https://gulfnews.com/world/gulf/saudi/saudi-man-arrested-for-false-news-on-covid-19-patient-1.1587544904557 |work=Gulf News |date=April 22, 2020))</ref> [[Oman]],<ref>((cite news |title=Legal action against spreading fake news |url=https://www.omanobserver.om/legal-action-against-spreading-fake-news/ |work=Oman Observer |date=March 21, 2020))</ref> [[Iran]],<ref>((cite news |title=Iran arrests ex-TV presenter for accusing regime of coronavirus cover-up |url=https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-arrests-ex-tv-presenter-for-accusing-regime-of-coronavirus-cover-up-624753 |work=The Jerusalem Post |date=April 15, 2020))</ref> [[Montenegro]],<ref>((cite news |title=Concern for Rights in Montenegro amid COVID-19 Fight |url=https://balkaninsight.com/2020/03/26/concern-for-rights-in-montenegro-amid-covid-19-fight/ |work=[[Balkan Insight]] |date=March 26, 2020))</ref> [[Vietnam]], [[Laos]],<ref>((cite news |title=Vietnam, Laos Arrest Facebookers on COVID-19-Related Charges |url=https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/facebook-04132020154643.html |work=[[Radio Free Asia]] |date=April 13, 2020))</ref> [[Indonesia]],<ref name="straitstimes">((cite news |title=Asia cracks down on coronavirus 'fake news' |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/coronavirus-asia-cracks-down-on-virus-fake-news |work=The Straits Times |date=April 10, 2020))</ref> [[Mongolia]],<ref name="straitstimes"/> [[Sri Lanka]],<ref name="straitstimes"/> [[Kenya]], [[South Africa]],<ref>((cite news |title=Arrests mount as Africa battles a destructive wave of COVID-19 disinformation |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-arrests-mount-as-africa-battles-a-destructive-wave-of-covid-1/ |work=The Globe and Mail |date=April 7, 2020))</ref> [[Nigeria]],<ref>((cite news |title=Coronavirus Law Used to Arrest Nigerian Journalist Over Health Story |url=https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/coronavirus-law-used-to-arrest-nigerian-journalist-over-health-story-2020-04-20?mod=mw_more_headlines&tesla=y |work=Market Watch |date=April 20, 2020 |access-date=May 17, 2020 |archive-date=May 21, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200521204841/https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/coronavirus-law-used-to-arrest-nigerian-journalist-over-health-story-2020-04-20?mod=mw_more_headlines&tesla=y |url-status=dead ))</ref> [[Ethiopia]],<ref>((cite news |title=Ethiopia: Free Speech at Risk Amid Covid-19 |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/06/ethiopia-free-speech-risk-amid-covid-19 |work=Human Rights Watch |date=May 6, 2020))</ref> [[Cote d'Ivoire]],<ref>((cite news |title=Authorities across West Africa attacking journalists covering COVID-19 pandemic |url=https://ifex.org/authorities-across-west-africa-attacking-journalists-covering-covid-19-pandemic/ |work=[[IFEX (organization)|IFEX]] |date=April 22, 2020))</ref> [[Somalia]],<ref>((cite news |title=Somali Journalists Arrested, Intimidated While Covering COVID-19 |url=https://www.voanews.com/extremism-watch/somali-journalists-arrested-intimidated-while-covering-covid-19 |work=VOA News |date=April 18, 2020))</ref> [[Mauritius]],<ref>((cite news |title=Controls to manage fake news in Africa are affecting freedom of expression |url=https://theconversation.com/controls-to-manage-fake-news-in-africa-are-affecting-freedom-of-expression-137808 |work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]] |date=May 11, 2020))</ref> [[Zimbabwe]],<ref>((cite news |title=Press freedom violations throughout Africa linked to Covid-19 coverage |url=http://www.rfi.fr/en/africa/20200414-press-freedom-violations-throughout-african-continent-linked-to-covid-19-coverage |work=[[Radio France Internationale]] |date=April 14, 2020))</ref> [[Thailand]],<ref>((cite news |title=Some leaders use pandemic to sharpen tools against critics |url=https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/coronavirus-crisis-excuses-curbs-free-speech-70177977 |work=ABC News |date=April 16, 2020))</ref> [[Kazakhstan]],<ref>((cite news |title=Kazakh Opposition Activist Detained For 'Spreading False Information' |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/kazakhstan-suraev-opposition-activist-detained-false-information-toqaev/30563253.html |work=Human Rights Watch |date=April 18, 2020))</ref> [[Azerbaijan]],<ref>((cite news |title=Azerbaijan: Crackdown on Critics Amid Pandemic |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/04/16/azerbaijan-crackdown-critics-amid-pandemic |work=Human Rights Watch |date=April 16, 2020))</ref> [[Malaysia]]<ref>((cite news |title=Malaysia arrests thousands amid coronavirus lockdown |url=https://www.voanews.com/science-health/coronavirus-outbreak/malaysia-arrests-thousands-amid-coronavirus-lockdown |work=VOA News |date=April 4, 2020))</ref> [[Singapore]],<ref>((cite news |title=Civil servant arrested for leaking info on number of virus cases |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/civil-servant-arrested-for-leaking-info-on-number-of-virus-cases |work=[[The Straits Times]] |date=April 16, 2020))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Singapore's fake news and contempt laws a threat to media, journalists say |url=https://www.voanews.com/press-freedom/singapores-fake-news-and-contempt-laws-threat-media-journalists-say |work=VOA News |date=May 6, 2020))</ref> and [[Hong Kong]]))

[[Algeria]]n lawmakers passed a law criminalising "fake news" deemed harmful to "public order and state security".<ref>((cite news |title=Algeria rights groups say government cracking down on critics |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/algeria-rights-groups-government-cracking-critics-200416173127184.html |work=Al Jazeera |date=April 23, 2020))</ref> The [[Ministry of the Interior (Turkey)|Turkish Interior Ministry]] has been [[Censorship in Turkey|arresting]] social media users whose posts were "targeting officials and spreading panic and fear by suggesting the virus had spread widely in Turkey and that officials had taken insufficient measures".<ref>((cite news |title=Coronavirus has started a censorship pandemic |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/01/coronavirus-censorship-pandemic-disinformation-fake-news-speech-freedom/ |work=The Foreign Policy |date=April 1, 2020))</ref> [[Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran|Iran's military]] said 3600 people have been arrested for "spreading rumors" about COVID-19 in the country.<ref>((cite news |title=Iran says 3,600 arrested for spreading coronavirus-related rumors |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-says-3600-arrested-for-spreading-coronavirus-related-rumors/30583656.html |work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) |date=April 29, 2020))</ref> In [[Cambodia]], some individuals who expressed concerns about the spread of COVID-19 have been arrested on fake news charges.<ref>((cite news |title=Cambodia accused of political clampdown amid coronavirus outbreak |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/03/cambodia-accused-political-clampdown-coronavirus-outbreak-200324063233803.html |work=Al Jazeera |date=March 24, 2020))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Cambodia's Lost Digital Opportunity in the COVID-19 Fight |url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/cambodias-lost-digital-opportunity-in-the-covid-19-fight/ |work=The Diplomat |date=April 17, 2020))</ref> The [[United Arab Emirates]] have introduced criminal penalties for the spread of misinformation and rumours related to the outbreak.<ref>((cite news |title=Gulf states use coronavirus threat to tighten authoritarian controls and surveillance |url=https://theconversation.com/gulf-states-use-coronavirus-threat-to-tighten-authoritarian-controls-and-surveillance-136631 |work=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]] |date=April 21, 2020))</ref>

===Strategies regarding the recipient ===
==== Cognitive biases of recipient ====
The vast proliferation of online information, such as in blogs and tweets, has inundated the online marketplace. Because of the resulting [[information overload]], humans cannot process all these information units (called [[Meme|memes]]), so [[confirmation bias]] and other cognitive biases decide which ones to pay attention to, thus enhancing the spread of fake news. Moreover, these cognitive vulnerabilities are easily exploited by both computer algorithms that present information one may like (based on previous social media use) and by individual manipulators who create social media bots to deliberately spread disinformation.<ref>((Citation | last1=Menczer |first1=Fillipo | last2=Hills |first2=Thomas | date=December 2020 | title=The attention economy: Understanding how algoriths and manipulators exploit our cognitive vulnerabilities empowers us to fight back (Information overload helps fake news spread, and social media knows it)|journal=[[Scientific American]] |volume = 323 |issue=6 |pages=54–61))</ref>

A recent study by Randy Stein and colleagues shows that conservatives value personal stories (non-scientific, intuitive or experiential evidence) more than do liberals (progressives), and therefore perhaps may be less swayed by scientific evidence. This study, however, only tested responses to apolitical messages.<ref name="stein">((Citation | last1=Stein | first1=Randy | last2=Swan | first2=Alexander | last3=Sarraf | first3=Michelle |title=Conservatives value personal stories more than liberals do when evaluating scientific evidence | journal=The Conversation | date = November 10, 2020))</ref><ref name="stein1">((Citation | last1=Stein | first1=Randy | last2=Swan | first2=Alexander | last3=Sarraf | first3=Michelle | title = Hearing from both sides: Differences between liberal and conservative attitudes toward scientific and experiential evidence | journal = Political Psychology | date=2021 | volume=42 | issue=3| pages=443–461 | doi=10.1111/pops.12706| s2cid=228936019 ))</ref>

==== Nudges as reflection prompts ====
People tend to react hastily and share fake news without thinking carefully about what they have read or heard, and without checking or verifying the information. "Nudging" people to consider the accuracy of incoming information has been shown to prompt people to think about it, to improve the accuracy of their judgement, and to reduce the likelihood that incorrect information is unreflectively shared.<ref name="Larson">((cite journal |last1=Larson |first1=Jennifer M. |title=Networks of conflict and cooperation |journal=Annual Review of Political Science |date=May 11, 2021 |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=89–107 |doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102523 |doi-access=free ))</ref><ref name="Pennycook">((cite journal |last1=Pennycook |first1=Gordon |last2=McPhetres |first2=Jonathon |last3=Zhang |first3=Yunhao |last4=Lu |first4=Jackson G. |last5=Rand |first5=David G. |title=Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention |journal=Psychological Science |date=July 2020 |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=770–780 |doi=10.1177/0956797620939054 |pmid=32603243 |pmc=7366427 ))</ref><ref name="Bago">((cite journal |last1=Bago |first1=Bence |last2=Rand |first2=David G. |last3=Pennycook |first3=Gordon |title=Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. |journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |date=August 2020 |volume=149 |issue=8 |pages=1608–1613 |doi=10.1037/xge0000729 |pmid=31916834 |hdl=1721.1/130414 |s2cid=210121815 |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-00479-001 |access-date=September 24, 2021|hdl-access=free ))</ref><ref>((Cite journal|last=Marsili|first=Neri|date=November 2021|title=Retweeting: its linguistic and epistemic value|url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-020-02731-y|journal=Synthese|language=en|volume=198|issue=11|pages=10457–10483|doi=10.1007/s11229-020-02731-y|s2cid=220260566|issn=0039-7857))</ref>  An example of a technology-based nudge is Twitter's "read before you retweet" prompt, which prompts readers to read an article and consider its contents before retweeting it.<ref name="Vincent">((cite news |last1=Vincent |first1=James |title=Twitter is bringing its 'read before you retweet' prompt to all |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/25/21455635/twitter-read-before-you-tweet-article-prompt-rolling-out-globally-soon |access-date=September 24, 2021 |work=The Verge |date=September 25, 2020))</ref>

==== Media critical thinking skills ====
Critical [[media literacy]] skills, for both printed and digital media, are essential for recipients to self-evaluate the accuracy of the media content. Media scholar Nolan Higdon argues that a critical media literacy education focused on teaching critical thinking about how to detect fake news is the most effective way for mitigating the pernicious influence of propaganda. Higdon offers a ten-step guide for detecting fake news.<ref name=Higdon/>

==== Mental immune health, inoculation and prebunking ====
American philosopher Andy Norman, in his book ''Mental Immunity'', argues for a new science of cognitive immunology as a practical guide to resisting bad ideas (such as [[conspiracy theories]]), as well as transcending petty [[tribalism]]. He argues that reasoned argument, the scientific method, fact-checking and critical thinking skills alone are insufficient to counter the broad scope of false information. Overlooked is the power of [[confirmation bias]], [[motivated reasoning]] and other cognitive biases that can seriously distort the many facets of mental 'immunity' (public resilience to fake news), particularly in dysfunctional societies.<ref name = "norman">((Citation | last = Norman | first = Andy | title = Mental immunity: Infectious ideas, mind-parasites, and the search for a better way to think | publisher = HarperCollins | year=2021 | isbn = 9780063138896 ))</ref>

The problem is that new misinformation – and its darker cousin, intentional disinformation – keep popping up all the time. Therefore, it is much better timewise to inoculate the population against misinformation, rather than to continually having to debunk each new claim later. Inoculation builds public resilience and creates the conditions for psychological '[[herd immunity]]'. The general term for this process is ''prebunking'', defined as the process of debunking lies, tactics or sources before they strike. New research shows that free online games can provide tools to fight fake news, leading to healthy skepticism when consuming news.<ref>((Cite web|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/misinformation-desk/202108/what-is-prebunking|title=What Is Prebunking? &#124; Psychology Today|website=www.psychologytoday.com|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref> ((As of|2023)), Google is rolling out novel prebunking video adverts, which have been shown to be effective in countering misinformation during trials in Eastern Europe.<ref name=Fortune>((Citation |title = This is a good news story in what has essentially been a bad news business: Google expands prebunking program | first=David | last=Klepper | newspaper=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]] | date= February 14, 2023 | url = https://fortune.com/2023/02/13/google-prebunking-videos-misninformation-europe-germany/)). With [[Associated Press]].</ref>

Most current research is based on [[inoculation theory]], a social psychological and communication theory that explains how an attitude or belief can be protected against persuasion or influence in much the same way a body can be protected against disease – for example, through pre-exposure to weakened versions of a stronger, future threat. The theory uses inoculation as its explanatory analogy—applied to attitudes (or beliefs) much like a vaccine is applied to an infectious disease. It has great potential for building public resilience ('immunity') against misinformation and fake news, for example, in tackling [[Denialism|science denialism]], risky health behaviours, and emotionally manipulative marketing and political messaging.<ref name = vanderlinden>((Citation | last = Van der Linden | first = Sander | title = Foolproof: Why misinformation infects our minds and how to build immunity | publisher = W. W. Norton | year = 2023 | isbn = 9780008466718))</ref><ref name = "compton2013">Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 220 - 236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.</ref><ref>((Cite journal | last1 = van der Linden | first1 = S. | last2 = Maibach| first2 = E. | last3 = Cook| first3 = J. | last4 = Leiserowitz| first4 = A. | last5 = Lewandowsky| first5 = S. | title = Inoculating against misinformation| doi = 10.1126/science.aar4533 | pmid = 29191898 | journal = Science |volume = 358 |issue=6367 | pages = 1141–1142 | year = 2017| bibcode = 2017Sci...358.1141V | s2cid = 206665892 | url = https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/278830 ))</ref><ref>((Cite journal | last = Nuccitelli | first = Dana | title = Study: Real facts can beat alternative facts if boosted by inoculation| journal = [[The Guardian]] |issue=January 24 |year = 2017 | url = https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jan/24/study-real-facts-can-beat-alternative-facts-if-boosted-by-inoculation))</ref>

For example, John Cook and colleagues have shown that inoculation theory shows promise in countering [[climate change denialism]]. This involves a two-step process. Firstly, the 50 or so most common myths about climate change are listed and deconstructed by identifying the reasoning errors and [[logical fallacies]] of each one. Secondly, the concept of parallel argumentation is used to explain the flaw in the argument by transplanting the same logic into a parallel situation, often an extreme or absurd one. Adding appropriate humour can be particularly effective.<ref name="cook1">((Citation | last1=Cook | first1=J. | last2=Lewandowsky | first2=S. | last3=Ecker | first3=U.| title=Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence | journal=PLOS ONE | date=2017 | volume=2 | issue=5 | pages=e0175799| doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 | pmid=28475576 | pmc=5419564 | bibcode=2017PLoSO..1275799C | doi-access=free ))</ref><ref>((Citation | last1=Cook | first1=John | last2=Ellerton | first2=Peter | last3=Kinkead | first3=David | title = Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors | journal= Environmental Research Letters | date=2018 | volume=13: 024018  | issue=2 | page=024018 | doi = 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa49f | bibcode=2018ERL....13b4018C | doi-access=free ))</ref><ref name="cook2">((Citation | last1=Cook | first1=John | title=Using humor and games to counter science misinformation | journal=Skeptical Inquirer | date=2020 | volume=44 | issue=3 | pages=38–41))</ref>

== History ==
=== Ancient ===
[[File:Marcus Antonius marble bust in the Vatican Museums.jpg|thumb|alt=stone sculpture of a man's head and neck|Roman politician and general [[Mark Antony]] killed himself because of misinformation.<ref name="MarcAntonysuicide"/>]]

In the 13th century BC, [[Rameses the Great]] spread lies and propaganda portraying the [[Battle of Kadesh]] as a stunning victory for the Egyptians; he depicted scenes of himself smiting his foes during the battle on the walls of nearly all his temples. The [[Egyptian–Hittite peace treaty|treaty]] between the Egyptians and the [[Hittites]], however, reveals that the battle was actually a [[stalemate]].<ref>((cite book|last1=Weir|first1=William|title=History's Greatest Lies|date=2009|publisher=Fair Winds Press|location=Beverly, Massachusetts|isbn=978-1592333363|pages=28–41))</ref>

During the first century BC, [[Augustus|Octavian]] ran a campaign of misinformation against his rival [[Mark Antony]], portraying him as a drunkard, a womanizer, and a mere puppet of the Egyptian queen [[Cleopatra VII]].<ref>((cite news|last1=Kaminska|first1=Izabella|title=A lesson in fake news from the info-wars of ancient Rome|url=https://www.ft.com/content/aaf2bb08-dca2-11e6-86ac-f253db7791c6?mhq5j=e3|access-date=July 4, 2017|agency=Financial Times|newspaper=Financial Times|date=January 17, 2017))</ref> He published a document purporting to be Mark Antony's will, which claimed that Mark Antony, upon his death, wished to be entombed in the mausoleum of the Ptolemaic pharaohs. Although the document may have been forged, it invoked outrage from the Roman populace.<ref>((cite news|last1=MacDonald|first1=Eve |author-link=Eve MacDonald |title=The fake news that sealed the fate of Atony and Cleopatra|url=http://theconversation.com/the-fake-news-that-sealed-the-fate-of-antony-and-cleopatra-71287|access-date=July 4, 2017|agency=The Conversation|work=The Conversation|date=January 13, 2017))</ref> Mark Antony ultimately killed himself after his defeat in the [[Battle of Actium]] upon hearing false rumors propagated by Cleopatra herself claiming that she had committed suicide.<ref name="MarcAntonysuicide">((cite web|title=Marc Antony and Cleopatra|url=https://www.biography.com/people/groups/mark-antony-and-cleopatra|website=biography.com|publisher=A&E Television Networks|access-date=July 4, 2017))</ref>

During the second and third centuries AD, false rumors were spread about Christians claiming that they engaged in ritual [[Human cannibalism|cannibalism]] and [[incest]].<ref>((cite book|last1=Ferguson|first1=Everett|title=Backgrounds of Early Christianity|date=1993|publisher=William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company|location=Grand Rapids, Michigan|isbn=978-0802806697|pages=556–564|edition=second))</ref><ref>((cite journal|last1=Sherwin-White|first1=A. N.|title=Why ere the early Christians persecuted? – An amendment|journal=Past and Present|date=April 1964|volume=27|issue=27|pages=23–27|doi=10.1093/past/27.1.23|jstor=649759))</ref> In the late third century AD, the [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[Lactantius]] invented and exaggerated stories about pagans engaging in acts of immorality and cruelty,<ref>((cite book|last1=Gwynn|first1=David M.|title=Christianity in the later Roman Empire|date=2015|publisher=Bloomsbury Sources in Ancient History|location=London|isbn=978-1441122551|page=16|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5aNOBAAAQBAJ&q=Lactantius|access-date=July 2, 2017))</ref> while the [[Criticism of Christianity|anti-Christian]] writer [[Porphyry (philosopher)|Porphyry]] invented similar stories about Christians.<ref>((cite book|last1=Clark|first1=Gillian|title=Christianity and Roman society|date=2004|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0521633109|page=36|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9-pS94xRcgsC&pg=PA36|access-date=July 2, 2017))</ref>

=== Medieval ===
In 1475, a fake news story in [[Trento|Trent]] claimed that the Jewish community had murdered a two-and-a-half-year-old Christian infant named [[Simon of Trent|Simonino]].<ref name="politico"/> The story resulted in all the Jews in the city being arrested and tortured; 15 of them were burned at the stake.<ref name="politico" /> [[Pope Sixtus IV]] himself attempted to stamp out the story; however, by that point, it had already spread beyond anyone's control.<ref name="politico" /> Stories of this kind were known as "[[blood libel]]"; they claimed that Jews purposely killed Christians, especially Christian children, and used their blood for religious or ritual purposes.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.adl.org/education/resources/glossary-terms/blood-libel|title=Blood libel: A false, incendiary claim against Jews|website=Anti-Defamation League))</ref>

=== Early modern ===
After the invention of the [[printing press]] in 1439, publications became widespread but there was no standard of journalistic ethics to follow. By the 17th century, historians began the practice of citing their sources in [[Note (typography)|footnotes]]. In 1610 when [[Galileo Galilei|Galileo]] went on trial, the demand for verifiable news increased.<ref name=politico />

During the 18th century publishers of fake news were fined and banned in the Netherlands; one man, Gerard Lodewijk van der Macht, was banned four times by Dutch authorities—and four times he moved and restarted his press.<ref name="FiveThirtyEight">((cite news |author=Borel, Brooke |date=January 4, 2017 |title=Fact-checking won't save us from fake news |url=https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/fact-checking-wont-save-us-from-fake-news/ |access-date=March 8, 2017 |work=[[FiveThirtyEight]]))</ref> In the American colonies, [[Benjamin Franklin]] wrote fake news about murderous "scalping" Indians working with King [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]] in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the American Revolution.<ref name=politico />

Canards, the successors of the 16th-century [[pasquinade]], were sold in Paris on the street for two centuries, starting in the 17th century. In 1793, [[Marie Antoinette]] was executed in part because of popular hatred engendered by a canard on which her face had been printed.<ref name=Darnton>((cite news|title=The true history of fake news|author=Darnton, Robert|date=February 13, 2017|work=[[New York Review of Books]]|access-date=March 8, 2017|url=http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/02/13/the-true-history-of-fake-news/))</ref>

During the era of slave-owning in the United States, supporters of slavery propagated fake news stories about African Americans, whom white people considered to have lower status.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1996/10/thomas-jefferson-radical-and-racist/376685/|title=Thomas Jefferson: Radical and racist|last=O'Brien|first=Conor Cruise|work=The Atlantic|access-date=June 29, 2017|language=en-US))</ref> Violence occurred in reaction to the spread of some fake news events. In one instance, stories of African Americans spontaneously turning white spread through the south and struck fear into the hearts of many people.<ref name="politico"/>

Rumors and anxieties about slave rebellions were common in Virginia from the beginning of the colonial period, despite the only major uprising occurring in the 19th century. One particular instance of fake news regarding revolts occurred in 1730. The serving governor of Virginia at the time, Governor William Gooch, reported that a slave rebellion had occurred but was effectively put down—although this never happened. After Gooch discovered the falsehood, he ordered slaves found off plantations to be punished, tortured and made prisoners.<ref>((cite web|url=http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/winter05-06/conspiracy.cfm|title=Slave conspiracies in colonial Virginia|website=history.org|access-date=June 29, 2017))</ref>

=== 19th century ===

[[File:1836 the-great-moon-hoax-new-inhabitants-of-the-moon.png|left|upright=.8|thumb|alt=b&w drawing of a man with large bat-wings reaching from over his head to mid-thigh|A "lunar animal" said to have been discovered by [[John Herschel]] on the [[Moon]]]]

From 1800 to 1810, James Cheetham made use of fictional stories to advocate politically against Aaron Burr.<ref name="Nine letters">((cite book|url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc2.ark:/13960/t3kw58q5w;view=1up;seq=1 |title=Nine letters on the subject of Aaron Burr's political defection, ... HathiTrust Digital Library &#124; HathiTrust Digital Library |publisher=Babel.hathitrust.org |date=December 8, 2018 |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref><ref name="A view">((cite book|url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b310395 |title=A view of the political conduct of Aaron Burr, Esq., Vice-President ... |publisher=Babel.hathitrust.org |date=August 22, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref> His stories were often defamatory and he was frequently sued for libel.<ref>((cite web|url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009027749 |title=Catalog Record: The trial of the Hon. Maturin Livingston, ... &#124; HathiTrust Digital Library |publisher=Catalog.hathitrust.org |date=May 6, 1908 |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref><ref>((cite web |url=https://www.ravellaw.com/opinions/91963cff266d7327d6c7aefce41919a7 |title=Cheetham v. Thomas, 5 Johns. 430 (1809) |publisher=Ravel Law |access-date=September 25, 2019 |archive-date=July 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731042532/https://www.ravellaw.com/opinions/91963cff266d7327d6c7aefce41919a7 |url-status=dead ))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=https://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/default.xqy?keys=FOEA-print-04-01-02-2263 |title=Aaron Burr v. James CheethamStatement re Election of 1800, 18 August 1805 |publisher=Rotunda.upress.virginia.edu |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref>

One instance of fake news was the [[Great Moon Hoax]] of 1835. ''[[The Sun (New York City)|The Sun]]'' newspaper of New York published articles about a real-life astronomer and a made-up colleague who, according to the hoax, had observed bizarre life on the Moon. The fictionalized articles successfully attracted new subscribers, and the penny paper suffered very little backlash after it admitted the next month that the series had been a hoax.<ref name="politico" /><ref>((Cite news |date=August 25, 1835 |title=The Great Moon Hoax |url=http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-great-moon-hoax |access-date=February 19, 2017 |publisher=history.com))</ref> Such stories were intended to entertain readers and not to mislead them.<ref name="FiveThirtyEight" />

[[Yellow journalism]] peaked in the mid-1890s characterizing the sensationalist journalism that arose in the circulation war between [[Joseph Pulitzer]]'s ''New York World'' and [[William Randolph Hearst]]'s ''New York Journal''. Pulitzer and other yellow journalism publishers goaded the United States into the [[Spanish–American War]], which was precipitated when the ((USS|Maine|ACR-1|6)) exploded in the harbor of [[Havana]], [[Cuba]].<ref>((cite web|url=https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/yellow-journalism|title=Milestones: 1866–1898|publisher=Office of the Historian |access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref> The term ''fake news'' itself was apparently first used in the 1890s during this era of sensationalist news reporting.<ref name = webster/>

[[File:PulitzerHearstWarYellowKids.jpg|thumb|right|alt=two men dressed as the Yellow Kid pushing on opposite sides of oversize building blocks bearing the letters W A R"|[[Joseph Pulitzer]] and [[William Randolph Hearst]] caricatured as they urged the U.S. into the [[Spanish–American War]]]]

=== 20th century ===

Fake news became popular and spread quickly in the 1900s. Media like newspapers, articles, and magazines were in high demand because of technology.<ref>((cite web|url=http://theconversation.com/techniques-of-19th-century-fake-news-reporter-teach-us-why-we-fall-for-it-today-75583|title=Techniques of 19th-century fake news reporter teach us why we fall for it today|last=McGillen|first=Petra S.|website=The Conversation|date=April 6, 2017 |language=en|access-date=March 25, 2019))</ref> Author [[Sarah Churchwell]] shows that when ''The New York Times'' reprinted the 1915 speech by Woodrow Wilson that popularized the phrase ''[[America First (policy)|America First]]'', they also used the subheading "Fake News Condemned" to describe a section of his speech warning against propaganda and misinformation, although Wilson himself had not used the phrase ''fake news''. In his speech, Wilson warned of a growing problem with news that "turn[s] out to be falsehood," warning the country it "could not afford 'to let the rumors of irresponsible persons and origins get into the United States'" as that would undermine democracy and the principle of a free and accurate press.<ref>[[Sarah Churchwell]] ''Behold America: A History of America First and the American Dream''. Bloomsbury, 2018. p. 44. ((ISBN|978-1408894804))</ref> Following a claim by CNN that "Trump was... the first US President to deploy [the term "fake news"] against his opponents",<ref>((cite news |last=Mackintosh |first=Eliza |date=October 25, 2020 |title=No matter who wins the US election, the world's 'fake news' problem is here to stay |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/25/world/trump-fake-news-legacy-intl/index.html |work=CNN))</ref> Sarah Churchwell's work was cited to claim that "it was Woodrow Wilson who popularized the phrase 'fake news' in 1915" without reference,<ref>((cite web |url=https://twitter.com/AllanKirkhart/status/1320534311322423302 |title=Twitter Post |last=Kirkhart |first=Allan |date=October 25, 2010 |website=Internet Archive |publisher=Twitter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026163403/https://twitter.com/AllanKirkhart/status/1320534311322423302 |access-date=October 27, 2020|archive-date=October 26, 2020 ))</ref> forcing her to counter this claim, saying that "the phrase 'fake news' was very much NOT popularized (or even used) by Wilson. The NY Times used it in passing but it didn't catch on. Trump was the first to popularize it."<ref>((cite web |url=https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1320638221169184770 |title=Twitter Post |last=Churchwell |first=Sarah |date=October 26, 2010 |website=Internet Archive |publisher=Twitter |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026134140/https://twitter.com/sarahchurchwell/status/1320638221169184770 |access-date=October 27, 2020|archive-date=October 26, 2020 ))</ref>

[[File:Peace rumor, New York. Crowd at Times Square holding up Extras telling about the signing of the Armistice. The... - NARA - 533477.tif|thumb|Residents of [[New York City]] celebrate the news of the [[Armistice of 11 November 1918]].]]
During the [[First World War]], an example of fake news was the [[anti-German sentiment|anti-German]] [[atrocity propaganda]] regarding an alleged "[[German Corpse Factory]]" in which the German battlefield dead were supposedly rendered down for fats used to make [[nitroglycerine]], candles, lubricants, [[Soap made from human corpses|human soap]] and boot dubbing. Unfounded rumors regarding such a factory circulated in the [[Allies of World War I|Allied]] press starting in 1915, and by 1917 the English-language publication ''[[North China Daily News]]'' presented these allegations as true at a time when Britain was trying to convince China to join the Allied war effort; this was based on new, allegedly true stories from ''[[The Times]]'' and the ''[[The Daily Mail|Daily Mail]]'' that turned out to be forgeries. These false allegations became known as such after the war, and in the [[Second World War]] [[Joseph Goebbels]] used the story in order to [[Holocaust denial|deny the ongoing massacre of Jews]] as British propaganda. According to [[Joachim Neander]] and [[Randal Marlin]], the story also "encouraged later disbelief" when reports about the Holocaust surfaced after the liberation of [[Auschwitz concentration camp|Auschwitz]] and [[Dachau concentration camp]]s.<ref name="BBC fake news">((cite news|title=The corpse factory and the birth of fake news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38995205|access-date=March 5, 2017 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=February 17, 2017))</ref>
After [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] and the [[Nazi Party]] rose to power in Germany in 1933, they established the [[Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda]] under the control of Propaganda Minister [[Joseph Goebbels]].<ref name="auto">((Cite news |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/goebbels/peopleevents/e_propaganda.html |title=American Experience . The Man Behind Hitler . ((!)) PBS |publisher=[[PBS]] |access-date=February 19, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170212092119/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/goebbels/peopleevents/e_propaganda.html |archive-date=February 12, 2017 ))</ref> The Nazis used both print and broadcast journalism to promote their agendas, either by obtaining ownership of those media or exerting political influence.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007655|title=The Press in the Third Reich|website=ushmm.org|language=en|access-date=June 29, 2017))</ref> The expression [[Big lie|''big lie'']] (((Lang-de|große Lüge|links=no))) was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book [[Mein Kampf|''Mein Kampf'']]. Throughout [[World War II]], both the [[Axis powers|Axis]] and the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]] employed fake news in the form of propaganda to persuade the public at home and in enemy countries.<ref>((cite news |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/29/the-real-007-used-fake-news-to-get-the-u-s-into-world-war-ii.html|title=The Real 007 Used Fake News to Get the U.S. into World War II|last=Wortman|first=Marc|date=January 29, 2017|newspaper=[[The Daily Beast]]|access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/12/world-war-2-propaganda-history-books/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221152209/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/12/world-war-2-propaganda-history-books/|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 21, 2016|title=Inside America's Shocking WWII Propaganda Machine|date=December 19, 2016|access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref> The British [[Political Warfare Executive]] used radio broadcasts and distributed leaflets to discourage German troops.<ref name="auto"/>

The [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]] claimed that ''[[The New York Times]]'' printed fake news "depicting Russia as a socialist paradise."<ref>((cite news|title=Judy Asks: Can Fake News Be Beaten?|url=http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/67789|access-date=February 14, 2017|work=Carnegie Europe|date=January 25, 2017|quote=Stalin fed fake news to New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer Prize for depicting Russia as a socialist paradise.))</ref> During 1932–1933, ''The New York Times'' published numerous articles by its Moscow bureau chief, [[Walter Duranty]], who won a [[Pulitzer prize]] for a series of reports about the Soviet Union.

=== 21st century ===
[[File:Dictators_-_Kim_Jong-Un_by_RepresentUs.webm|thumb|Deep fakes]]
In the 21st century, both the impact of fake news and the use of the term became widespread.<ref name="NYT-20170623"/><ref>((cite book |last1=Kaplan |first1=Andreas |chapter=Artificial Intelligence, Social Media, and Fake News: Is This the End of Democracy? |title=Digital Transformation in Media & Society |chapter-url=https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/DF3BF2DBD76E4F7DB8A7143D0EA6F212 |doi=10.26650/B/SS07.2020.013.09 |editor1=Ayşen Akkor Gül |editor2=Yıldız Dilek Ertürk |editor3=Paul Elmer|publisher=Istanbul University Press|doi-broken-date=January 31, 2024 ))</ref>

The increasing openness, access and prevalence of the Internet resulted in its growth.  New information and stories are published constantly and at a faster rate than ever, often lacking in verification, which may be consumed by anyone with an Internet connection.<ref name = "spotfake"/><ref>((cite web|url=http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2060/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=d0a10b0d-5a80-4485-8e38-105efc2b29dc%40pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=126274669&db=aph|title=Combating fake news in the digital age|last=Burkhardt|first=Johanna|access-date=April 10, 2018|archive-date=July 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731030221/http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2060/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=d0a10b0d-5a80-4485-8e38-105efc2b29dc%40pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=126274669&db=aph|url-status=dead))</ref> Fake news has grown from being sent via emails to attacking social media.<ref name = "spotfake"/> Besides referring to made-up stories designed to deceive readers into clicking on links, maximizing traffic and profit, the term has also referred to satirical news, whose purpose is not to mislead but rather to inform viewers and share humorous commentary about real news and the [[mainstream media]].<ref>((cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/25/us/politics/fake-news-claims-conservatives-mainstream-media-.html|title=Wielding claims of 'fake news,' conservatives take aim at mainstream media|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |first=Jeremy W. |last=Peters |date=December 25, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/daily-show-with-jon-stewart-last-show-influence-on-media-politics/|title=A look at "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart's legacy|work=[[CBS News]]))</ref> United States examples of satire include the newspaper ''[[The Onion]]'', ''[[Saturday Night Live]]''(('))s ''[[Weekend Update]]'', and the television shows ''[[The Daily Show]]'', ''[[The Colbert Report]]'', ''[[The Late Show with Stephen Colbert]]''.<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a23798/michael-che-weekend-update-snl/|title=Why SNL's 'Weekend Update' change is brilliant|date=September 12, 2014|newspaper=[[Esquire (magazine)|Esquire]]|access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref><ref>((Cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/2013/08/29/216439725/area-man-realizes-hes-been-reading-fake-news-for-25-years|title=Area Man realizes he's been reading fake news for 25 years|publisher=[[NPR]] |access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.newsobserver.com/entertainment/books/article121956252.html|title='The Daily Show (The Book)' is a reminder of when fake news was funny|newspaper=[[The News & Observer]] |location=Raleigh, N.C. |access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref>

21st-century fake news is often intended to increase the financial profits of the news outlet. In an interview with [[NPR]], Jestin Coler, former CEO of the fake media conglomerate [[Denver Guardian|Disinfomedia]], told who writes fake news articles, who funds these articles, and why fake news creators create and distribute false information. Coler, who has since left his role as a fake news creator, said that his company employed 20 to 25 writers at a time and made $10,000 to $30,000 monthly from advertisements. Coler began his career in journalism as a magazine salesman before working as a freelance writer. He said he entered the fake news industry to prove to himself and others just how rapidly fake news can spread.<ref>((Cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/23/503146770/npr-finds-the-head-of-a-covert-fake-news-operation-in-the-suburbs|title=We tracked down a fake-news creator in the suburbs. Here's what we learned|last=Sydell|first=Laura|date=November 23, 2016|publisher=[[NPR]]))</ref> Disinfomedia is not the only outlet responsible for the distribution of fake news; Facebook users play a major role in feeding into fake news stories by making sensationalized stories "trend", according to [[BuzzFeed]] media editor Craig Silverman, and the individuals behind Google AdSense basically fund fake news websites and their content.<ref>((Cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/2016/12/14/505547295/fake-news-expert-on-how-false-stories-spread-and-why-people-believe-them|title=Fake news expert on how false stories spread and why people believe them| last=Davies| first=Dave| date=December 14, 2016|publisher=[[NPR]]))</ref> [[Mark Zuckerberg]], CEO of Facebook, said, "I think the idea that fake news on Facebook influenced the election in any way, I think is a pretty crazy idea" and then a few days later he blogged that Facebook was looking for ways to flag fake news stories.<ref name=CBSNews20161117>((cite news|title=Probe reveals stunning stats about fake election headlines on Facebook|date=November 17, 2016|work=[[CBS News]]|access-date=May 5, 2017|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-fake-election-news-more-popular-than-real-news-buzzfeed-investigation/))</ref>

Many online pro-[[Donald Trump|Trump]] fake news stories have been sourced out of [[Veles, Macedonia|Veles]], [[Republic of Macedonia|Macedonia]], where approximately seven different fake news organizations employ hundreds of teenagers to rapidly produce and plagiarize sensationalist stories for different U.S. based companies and parties.<ref>((cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38168281|title=The city getting rich from fake news|last=Kirby|first=Emma Jane|date=December 5, 2016|work=[[BBC News]]))</ref>

Kim LaCapria of the fact checking website [[Snopes.com]] has stated that, in America, fake news is a bipartisan phenomenon, saying that "[t]here has always been a sincerely held yet erroneous belief misinformation is more [[Red states and blue states|red than blue in America]], and that has never been true."<ref>((cite news |last1=Tait|first1=Amelia |date=February 9, 2016 |title=The May Doctrine |newspaper=[[New Statesman]] |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/media/2017/02/fake-news-problem-left-too|access-date=March 7, 2017)) Published online February 11, 2017, as "Fake news is a problem for the left, too".</ref> [[Jeff Green (businessman)|Jeff Green]] of [[Trade Desk]] agrees the phenomenon affects both sides. Green's company found that affluent and well-educated persons in their 40s and 50s are the primary consumers of fake news. He told [[Scott Pelley]] of ''[[60 Minutes]]'' that this audience tends to live in an "[[Echo chamber (media)|echo chamber]]" and that these are the people who vote.<ref name=60Minutes>((cite video|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-fake-news-find-your-social-media-feeds/|title=60 Minutes: How fake news becomes a popular, trending topic|publisher=[[CBS News]]|date=March 26, 2017|access-date=March 27, 2017))</ref>

In 2014, the [[Russian Government]] used disinformation via networks such as [[RT (TV network)|RT]] to create a counter-narrative after Russian-backed Ukrainian rebels shot down [[Malaysia Airlines Flight 17]].<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/europe/russia-sweden-disinformation.html|title=A powerful Russian weapon: The spread of false stories|last=Macfarquhar|first=Neil|date=August 28, 2016|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=February 19, 2017 ))</ref> In 2016, [[NATO]] claimed it had seen a significant rise in Russian propaganda and fake news stories since the invasion of Crimea in 2014.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-russia-media-idUSKBN15Q0MG|title=NATO says it sees sharp rise in Russian disinformation since Crimea seizure|date=February 11, 2017|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref> Fake news stories originating from Russian government officials were also circulated internationally by [[Reuters]] news agency and published in the most popular news websites in the United States.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Watanabe |first1=Kohei |title=The spread of the Kremlin's narratives by a western news agency during the Ukraine crisis |journal=The Journal of International Communication |date=January 2, 2017 |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=138–158 |doi=10.1080/13216597.2017.1287750 |s2cid=157606052 |url=http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/69213/2/Watanabe_The%20spread%20of%20the%20Kremlin%E2%80%99s%20narratives_Author_2017%20LSERO.pdf ))</ref>

A 2018 study at Oxford University found that Trump's supporters consumed the "largest volume of 'junk news' on Facebook and Twitter":<ref name="Narayanan_Barash_2/8/2018">((cite arXiv |eprint=1803.01845 |class=cs.SI |first1=Vidya |last1=Narayanan |first2=Vlad |last2=Barash |title=Polarization, partisanship and junk news consumption over social media in the US |date=March 4, 2018 |last3=Kelly |first3=John |last4=Kollanyi |first4=Bence |last5=Neudert |first5=Lisa-Maria |last6=Howard |first6=Philip N. |author6-link=Philip N. Howard))</ref>
((blockquote|On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters consumes the largest volume of junk news, and junk news is the largest proportion of news links they share," the researchers concluded. On Facebook, the skew was even greater. There, "extreme hard right pages—distinct from Republican pages—share more junk news than all the other audiences put together.<ref name="Hern_2/6/2018">((cite news | last=Hern | first=Alex | title=Fake news sharing in US is a rightwing thing, says study | newspaper=[[The Guardian]] | date=February 6, 2018 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/06/sharing-fake-news-us-rightwing-study-trump-university-of-oxford | access-date=March 31, 2018))</ref>))

In 2018,<ref name="Guess_Nyhan_Reifler_1/9/2018">((cite web | last1=Guess | first1=Andrew | last2=Nyhan | first2=Brendan | last3=Reifler | first3=Jason | date=January 9, 2018 | title=Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign | website=[[Dartmouth College]] | url=https://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf | access-date=February 4, 2018 | archive-date=February 23, 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223155230/https://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/fake-news-2016.pdf | url-status=dead ))</ref> researchers from [[Princeton University]], [[Dartmouth College]] and the [[University of Exeter]] examined the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Their findings showed that Trump supporters and older Americans (over 60) were far more likely to consume fake news than Clinton supporters. Those most likely to visit fake news websites were the 10% of Americans who consumed the most [[Conservatism|conservative]] information. There was a very large difference (800%) in the consumption of fake news stories as related to total news consumption between Trump supporters (6%) and Clinton supporters (1%).<ref name="Guess_Nyhan_Reifler_1/9/2018"/><ref name="Sarlin_1/14/2018">((cite web |last=Sarlin |first=Benjy |title='Fake news' went viral in 2016. This professor studied who clicked | website=NBC News | date=January 14, 2018 |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/fake-news-went-viral-2016-expert-studied-who-clicked-n836581 |access-date=February 4, 2018))</ref>

The study also showed that fake pro-Trump and fake pro-Clinton news stories were read by their supporters, but with a significant difference: Trump supporters consumed far more (40%) than Clinton supporters (15%). Facebook was by far the key "gateway" website where these fake stories were spread and which led people to then go to the fake news websites. [[Fact checking|Fact checks]] of fake news were rarely seen by consumers,<ref name="Guess_Nyhan_Reifler_1/9/2018"/><ref name="Sarlin_1/14/2018"/> with none of those who saw a fake news story being reached by a related fact check.<ref name="Poynter_1/3/2018">((cite web |title=Fake news and fact-checking websites both reach about a quarter of the population – but not the same quarter |website=Poynter Institute |date=January 3, 2018 |url=https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking-research-database/fake-news-and-fact-checking-websites-both-reach-about-quarter |access-date=February 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180206190234/https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking-research-database/fake-news-and-fact-checking-websites-both-reach-about-quarter |archive-date=February 6, 2018 |url-status=dead))</ref>

[[Brendan Nyhan]], one of the researchers, emphatically stated in an interview on NBC News: "People got vastly more misinformation from Donald Trump than they did from fake news websites—full stop."<ref name="Sarlin_1/14/2018"/>
((blockquote|((Break lines|NBC NEWS: "It feels like there's a connection between having an active portion of a party that's prone to seeking false stories and conspiracies and a president who has famously spread conspiracies and false claims. In many ways, demographically and ideologically, the president fits the profile of the fake news users that you're describing."
NYHAN: "It's worrisome if fake news websites further weaken the norm against false and misleading information in our politics, which unfortunately has eroded. But it's also important to put the content provided by fake news websites in perspective. People got vastly more misinformation from Donald Trump than they did from fake news websites—full stop."<ref name="Sarlin_1/14/2018"/>))))

A 2019 study by researchers at [[Princeton University|Princeton]] and [[New York University]] found that a person's likelihood of sharing fake-news articles correlated more strongly with age than it did education, sex, or political views. 11% of users older than 65 shared an article consistent with the study's definition of fake news. Just 3% of users ages 18 to 29 did the same.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Guess |first1=Andrew |last2=Nagler |first2=Jonathan |last3=Tucker |first3=Joshua |title=Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook |journal=Science Advances |date=January 2019 |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=eaau4586 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 |pmid=30662946 |pmc=6326755 |bibcode=2019SciA....5.4586G ))</ref>

Another issue in mainstream media is the usage of the [[filter bubble]], a "bubble" that has been created that gives the viewer, on social media platforms, a specific piece of the information knowing they will like it. Thus creating fake news and biased news because only half the story is being shared, the portion the viewer liked. "In 1996, Nicolas Negroponte predicted a world where information technologies become increasingly customizable."<ref>((cite journal |last1=Spohr |first1=Dominic |title=Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media |journal=Business Information Review |date=September 2017 |volume=34 |issue=3 |pages=150–160 |doi=10.1177/0266382117722446 |s2cid=158078019 ))</ref>

== Special topics ==

=== Deepfakes and shallowfakes ===
((See also| Deepfakes ))

'''Deepfakes''' (a [[portmanteau]] of [[deep learning|''deep learning'']] and ''fake'') are [[synthetic media]] (AI-generated media)<ref>((Cite web|url=https://lab.witness.org/projects/synthetic-media-and-deep-fakes/|title=Prepare, don't panic: Synthetic media and deepfakes|publisher=witness.org|access-date=25 November 2020|archive-date=2 December 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201202231744/https://lab.witness.org/projects/synthetic-media-and-deep-fakes/|url-status=live))</ref> in which a person in an existing image or video is replaced with someone else's likeness.<ref name="Waldrop">((cite journal |last1=Waldrop |first1=M. Mitchell |title=Synthetic media: The real trouble with deepfakes |journal=Knowable Magazine |publisher= Annual Reviews |date=16 March 2020 |doi=10.1146/knowable-031320-1|doi-access=free |url=https://knowablemagazine.org/article/technology/2020/synthetic-media-real-trouble-deepfakes |access-date=19 December 2022 |language=en))</ref>

Because a picture often has a greater impact than the corresponding words, deepfakes – which leverage powerful techniques from [[machine learning]] and [[artificial intelligence]] to manipulate or generate visual and audio content – have a particularly high potential to deceive.<ref name=":17">((Cite journal|last1=Kietzmann| first1=J.|last2=Lee|first2=L. W.|last3=McCarthy|first3=I. P.|last4=Kietzmann|first4=T. C.|title=Deepfakes: Trick or treat?|journal=Business Horizons|volume=63|issue=2 |pages=135–146|doi=10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006|year=2020| s2cid=213818098| url=https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/38737/1/1247050_Lee.pdf))</ref> The main machine-learning methods used to create deepfakes are based on deep learning and involve training generative [[artificial neural network|neural network]] architectures, such as [[autoencoder]]s<ref name=":17" />  or [[generative adversarial network]]s (GANs).<ref name="Schwartz">((cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/12/deep-fakes-fake-news-truth|title=You thought fake news was bad? Deep fakes are where truth goes to die|last1=Schwartz|first1=Oscar|date=12 November 2018|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=14 November 2018|language=en|archive-date=16 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190616230351/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/12/deep-fakes-fake-news-truth|url-status=live))</ref><ref name=":14">((Cite web|url=https://towardsdatascience.com/family-fun-with-deepfakes-or-how-i-got-my-wife-onto-the-tonight-show-a4454775c011|title=Family fun with deepfakes. Or how I got my wife onto the Tonight Show|first=Sven|last=Charleer|date=2019-05-17|website=Medium|language=en|access-date=2019-11-08|archive-date=11 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180211141135/https://towardsdatascience.com/family-fun-with-deepfakes-or-how-i-got-my-wife-onto-the-tonight-show-a4454775c011|url-status=live))</ref>

Deepfakes have garnered widespread attention for their uses in creating fake news (notably political), but also child sexual abuse material, [[Celebrity sex tape|celebrity pornographic videos]], [[revenge porn]], [[hoax]]es, bullying, and [[Accounting scandals|financial fraud]].<ref name="HighSnobiety2018">((Cite news | url=https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/what-are-deepfakes-ai-porn/ | title = What are deepfakes and why the future of porn is terrifying | date=2018-02-20 | work=Highsnobiety | access-date=2018-02-20 | language=en-US | archive-date=14 July 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210714032914/https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/what-are-deepfakes-ai-porn/ | url-status=live ))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=https://theoutline.com/post/3179/deepfake-videos-are-freaking-experts-out|title=Experts fear face swapping tech could start an international showdown|website=The Outline|language=en|access-date=2018-02-28|archive-date=16 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200116140157/https://theoutline.com/post/3179/deepfake-videos-are-freaking-experts-out|url-status=live))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/technology/fake-videos-deepfakes.html|title=Here come the fake videos, too|last=Roose|first=Kevin|date=2018-03-04|work=The New York Times|access-date=2018-03-24|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=18 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190618203019/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/technology/fake-videos-deepfakes.html|url-status=live))</ref> This has elicited responses from both industry and government to detect and limit their use.<ref name=":28">((Cite web|url=https://thenextweb.com/insider/2018/02/07/twitter-pornhub-and-other-platforms-ban-ai-generated-celebrity-porn/|title=Twitter, Pornhub and other platforms ban AI-generated celebrity porn|last=Ghoshal|first=Abhimanyu|date=2018-02-07|website=The Next Web|language=en-us|access-date=2019-11-09|archive-date=20 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191220061859/https://thenextweb.com/insider/2018/02/07/twitter-pornhub-and-other-platforms-ban-ai-generated-celebrity-porn/|url-status=live))</ref><ref name=":5" />

Deepfakes generally require specialist software or knowledge, but much the same effect can be achieved quickly by anyone using standard video editing software on most modern computers. These videos (termed ''shallowfakes'') have obvious flaws, but nevertheless can still be widely believed as real, or at least have entertainment value that reinforces beliefs. One of the first to go viral, "The Hillary Song", watched over 3 million times by Donald Trump supporters, shows Hillary Clinton being humiliated on stage by [[Dwayne Johnson|The Rock]], a former wrestling champion. The surprised creator (who hates all politicians), pasted images of Clinton into a genuine video of The Rock humiliating a wrestling official.<ref>((Citation | last=Grothaus | first= Michael. | title = Trust no one: Inside the world of deepfakes | publisher = HodderStudio | year = 2021 | pages=27–56 | isbn=9781529347982))</ref>

=== Bots on social media ===
In the mid-1990s, [[Nicholas Negroponte|Nicolas Negroponte]] anticipated a world where news through technology become progressively personalized. In his 1996 book&nbsp;''Being Digital''&nbsp;he predicted a digital life where news consumption becomes an extremely personalized experience and newspapers adapted content to reader preferences. This prediction has since been reflected in modern-day news and social media feeds.<ref>((Cite journal|last=Spohr|first=Dominic|date=August 23, 2017|title=Fake news and ideological polarization|journal=Business Information Review|volume=34|issue=3|pages=150–160|doi=10.1177/0266382117722446|s2cid=158078019))</ref>

Bots have the potential to increase the spread of fake news, as they use algorithms to decide what articles and information specific users like, without taking into account the authenticity of an article. Bots mass-produce and spread articles, regardless of the credibility of the sources, allowing them to play an essential role in the mass spread of fake news, as bots are capable of creating fake accounts and personalities on the web that are then gaining followers, recognition, and authority. Additionally, almost 30% of the spam and content spread on the Internet originates from these software bots.<ref>((Cite journal|last=Burkhardt|first=Joanna M.|date=2017|title=Can technology save us?|journal=Library Technology Reports|volume=53|page=14|id=((ProQuest|1967322547))))</ref>

In the 21st century, the capacity to mislead was enhanced by the widespread use of social media. For example, one 21st century website that enabled fake news' proliferation was the [[List of Facebook features|Facebook newsfeed]].<ref name = isaac>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/14/technology/facebook-is-said-to-question-its-influence-in-election.html|title=Facebook, in cross hairs after election, is said to question its influence|last=Isaac| first=Mike|date=December 12, 2016| newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref name="FinancialTimes">((Cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/2910a7a0-afd7-11e6-a37c-f4a01f1b0fa1|title=Harsh truths about fake news for Facebook, Google and Twitter|last=Matthew Garrahan and Tim Bradshaw|first=Richard Waters|date=November 21, 2016|newspaper=[[Financial Times]]|access-date=January 17, 2017))</ref> In late 2016 fake news gained notoriety following the uptick in news content by this means, and its prevalence on the [[Microblogging|micro-blogging]] site [[Twitter]].<ref name="Guardian11.11.16"/><ref name="politico"/> In the United States, 62% of Americans use social media to receive news.<ref name = pew2>((cite web|url=http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/|title=News use across social media platforms 2016|last1=Gottfried|first1=Jeffrey|last2=Shearer|first2=Elisa|date=May 26, 2016|publisher=Pew Research Center's Journalism Project|access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref> Many people use their Facebook News Feed to get news, despite Facebook not being considered a news site.<ref>((cite journal |id=((ProQuest|1894938656)) |last1=Goldsborough |first1=Reid |title=Understanding Facebook's News Feed |journal=Tech Directions |location=Ann Arbor |volume=76 |issue=9 |date=May 2017 ))</ref> According to Craig McClain, over 66% of Facebook users obtain news from the site.<ref>((cite journal |last1=McClain |first1=Craig R. |title=Practices and promises of Facebook for science outreach: Becoming a 'Nerd of Trust' |journal=PLOS Biology |date=June 27, 2017 |volume=15 |issue=6 |pages=e2002020 |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002020 |pmid=28654674 |pmc=5486963 |doi-access=free ))</ref> This, in combination with increased political polarization and [[filter bubble]]s, led to a tendency for readers to mainly read headlines.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/10/facebook-fake-news-election-conspiracy-theories|title=Facebook's failure: Did fake news and polarized politics get Trump elected?|last=Solon|first=Olivia|date=November 10, 2016|newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref>

Numerous individuals and news outlets have stated that fake news may have influenced the outcome of the [[2016 American Presidential Election]].<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/fake-news-and-filter-bubbles/| title=Forget Facebook and Google, burst your own filter bubble|date=December 6, 2016|publisher=Digital Trends|access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref>((cite news|last1=Parkinson|first1=Hannah Jane|title=Click and elect: how fake news helped Donald Trump win a real election|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/14/fake-news-donald-trump-election-alt-right-social-media-tech-companies|access-date=July 4, 2017|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]))</ref> Fake news saw higher sharing on Facebook than legitimate news stories,<ref name="Silverman_11/16/2016">((cite news |last=Silverman |first=Craig |title = This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook |date=November 16, 2016 |url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook |work=[[BuzzFeed News]] |access-date=July 20, 2022 ))</ref><ref>[[Chang, Juju]]; Lefferman, Jake; Pedersen, Claire; Martz, Geoff (November 29, 2016). [https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/fake-news-stories-make-real-news-headlines/story?id=43845383 "When fake news stories make real news headlines"]. ''[[Nightline]]''. [[ABC News]].</ref><ref name=PCWorld>((Cite news|url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/3142412/windows/just-how-partisan-is-facebooks-fake-news-we-tested-it.html|title=Just how partisan is Facebook's fake news? We tested it|newspaper=[[PC World]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=http://6abc.com/news/fake-news-is-dominating-facebook/1621221/|title=Fake news is dominating Facebook|date=November 23, 2016|publisher=6abc Philadelphia|access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref> which analysts explained was because fake news often panders to expectations or is otherwise more exciting than legitimate news.<ref name=LATimes>((Cite news |url=http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-fake-news-guide-2016-story.html|title=Where fake news came from – and why some readers believe it|last=Agrawal|first=Nina|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |access-date=January 15, 2017))</ref><ref name=PCWorld/> [[Facebook]] itself initially denied this characterization.<ref name=FinancialTimes/><ref name = isaac/> A [[Pew Research]] poll conducted in December 2016 found that 64% of U.S. adults believed completely made-up news had caused "a great deal of confusion" about the basic facts of current events, while 24% claimed it had caused "some confusion" and 11% said it had caused "not much or no confusion".<ref name = pew1>((cite web|url=http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/|title=Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion| last1=Barthel|first1=Michael|last2=Mitchell| first2=Amy|date=December 15, 2016|publisher=Pew Research Center's Journalism Project|access-date=January 27, 2017|last3=Holcomb|first3=Jesse))</ref> Additionally, 23% of those polled admitted they had personally shared fake news, whether knowingly or not. Researchers from [[Stanford]] assessed that only 8% of readers of fake news recalled and believed in the content they were reading, though the same share of readers also recalled and believed in "placebos"—stories they did not actually read, but that were produced by the authors of the study. In comparison, over 50% of the participants recalled reading and believed in true news stories.<ref name=":03"/>

By August 2017 Facebook stopped using the term ''fake news'' and used ''false news'' in its place instead. Will Oremus of ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'' wrote that because supporters of [[U.S. President]] [[Donald Trump]] had redefined the word ''fake news'' to refer to mainstream media opposed to them, "it makes sense for Facebook—and others—to cede the term to the right-wing trolls who have claimed it as their own."<ref>((cite magazine|author=Oremus, Will|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/08/08/facebook_has_stopped_saying_fake_news_is_false_news_any_better.html|title=Facebook has stopped saying "fake news"|magazine=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]|date=August 8, 2017|access-date=August 11, 2017))</ref>

Research from [[Northwestern University]] concluded that 30% of all fake news traffic, as opposed to only 8% of real news traffic, could be linked back to Facebook. The research concluded fake news consumers do not exist in a filter bubble; many of them also consume real news from established news sources. The fake news audience is only 10 percent of the real news audience, and most fake news consumers spent a relatively similar amount of time on fake news compared with real news consumers—with the exception of [[Drudge Report]] readers, who spent more than 11 times longer reading the website than other users.<ref name=ColumbiaJReview>((Cite news|url=https://www.cjr.org/analysis/fake-news-facebook-audience-drudge-breitbart-study.php|title=Is 'fake news' a fake problem?|newspaper=[[Columbia Journalism Review]]|access-date=February 19, 2017))</ref>

In the wake of western events, China's Ren Xianling of the [[Cyberspace Administration of China]] suggested a "reward and punish" system be implemented to avoid fake news.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-internet-idUSKBN13F01K|title=China says terrorism, fake news impel greater global internet curbs|date=November 20, 2016|work=[[Reuters]]|access-date=January 17, 2017))</ref>

=== Internet trolls ===
((See also|Internet trolls))

In [[Internet slang]], a [[Internet troll|troll]] is a person who sows discord on the [[Internet]] by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, [[wikt:Extraneous#Adjective|extraneous]], or [[off-topic]] messages in an online community (such as a [[newsgroup]], forum, [[chat room]], or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an [[emotion]]al response or off-topic discussion, often for the troll's amusement. Internet trolls also feed on attention.<ref name = time1/>

The idea of Internet trolls gained popularity in the 1990s, though its meaning shifted in 2011. Whereas it once denoted provocation, it is a term now widely used to signify the abuse and misuse of the Internet. Trolling comes in various forms, and can be dissected into abuse trolling, entertainment trolling, classical trolling, flame trolling, anonymous trolling, and kudos trolling. It is closely linked to fake news, as Internet trolls are now largely interpreted as perpetrators of false information, information that can often be passed along unwittingly by reporters and the public alike.<ref>((cite journal |last1=Binns |first1=Amy |title=Don't feed the trolls!: Managing troublemakers in magazines' online communities |journal=Journalism Practice |date=August 2012 |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=547–562 |doi=10.1080/17512786.2011.648988 |s2cid=143013977 |url=http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/8377/1/8377_Binns.pdf ))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2016/10/26/499442453/the-twitter-paradox-how-a-platform-designed-for-free-speech-enables-internet-tro|title=The Twitter paradox: How a platform designed for free speech enables internet trolls|last=Gross|first=Terry|date=October 2016|website=NPR|access-date=May 30, 2018))</ref>

When interacting with each other, trolls often share misleading information that contributes to the fake news circulated on sites like [[Twitter]] and [[Facebook]].<ref name = time1>((Cite news |url=http://time.com/4457110/internet-trolls/|title=How trolls are ruining the internet|last=Steain|first=Joel|date=August 18, 2016|magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] ))</ref> In the 2016 American election, Russia paid over 1,000 Internet trolls to circulate fake news and disinformation about [[Hillary Clinton]]; they also created social media accounts that resembled voters in important swing states, spreading influential political standpoints.<ref>((Cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-bots-still-interfering-in-u-s-politics-after-election-expert|title=Russian bots still interfering in U.S. politics after election, says expert witness|last=Watson|first=Kathryn|date=March 30, 2017|work=[[CBS News]] |access-date=September 20, 2017))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Facebook says Russian accounts bought $100,000 in ads during the 2016 Election |url=http://time.com/4930532/facebook-russian-accounts-2016-election/ |magazine=Time |date=September 6, 2017))</ref> In February 2019, [[Glenn Greenwald]] wrote that cybersecurity company New Knowledge "was caught just six weeks ago engaging in a massive scam to create fictitious Russian troll accounts on Facebook and Twitter in order to claim that the Kremlin was working to defeat Democratic Senate nominee [[Doug Jones (politician)|Doug Jones]] in [[Alabama]]."<ref>((cite news |title = NBC News, to claim Russia supports Tulsi Gabbard, relies on firm just caught fabricating Russia data for the Democratic Party |url=https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/nbc-news-to-claim-russia-supports-tulsi-gabbard-relies-on-firm-just-caught-fabricating-russia-data-for-the-democratic-party/ |work=The Intercept |date=February 3, 2019))</ref>

=== Fake news hoaxes ===
[[Paul Horner]] is perhaps the best known example of a person who deliberately creates fake news for a purpose. He has been referred to as a "hoax artist" by the [[Associated Press]] and the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''.<ref>((cite news |title = Not real news: A look at what didn't happen this week |url=https://apnews.com/article/bea2cc70a68142ab89e4f1271e1ed991 |work=AP NEWS |date=May 26, 2017 |quote = The St. George Gazette is an outlet of admitted hoax artist Paul Horner.))</ref> ''[[The Huffington Post]]'' called Horner a "performance artist".<ref>Frank, Priscilla (April 19, 2017). [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/alex-jones_us_58f60e61e4b0da2ff8632204 "Alex Jones says he's a performance artist. Surprisingly, actual performance artists agree."]. ''[[The Huffington Post]]''.</ref>

Horner was behind several widespread hoaxes such as: (1) that the graffiti artist [[Banksy]] had been arrested;<ref>((cite web|last1=LaCapria|first1=Kim|title=Snopes' Field Guide to Fake News Sites and Hoax Purveyors|url=http://www.snopes.com/2016/01/14/fake-news-sites/|website=[[Snopes.com]]|date=November 2, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news|last1=Hathaway|first1=Jay|title=Banksy has not been arrested, and his name isn't Paul Horner|url=http://gawker.com/banksy-has-not-been-arrested-and-his-name-isnt-paul-ho-1648367427 |publisher=Gawker |date=October 20, 2014))</ref> and (2) that he had an "enormous impact" on the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]], according to [[CBS News]].<ref>((cite news|author=Gunaratna, Shanika|title=Facebook fake news creator claims he put Trump in White House|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-election-facebook-fake-news-creator-paul-horner-claims-responsibility/|work=[[CBS News]]|date=November 17, 2016))</ref> These stories consistently appeared in [[Google Search|Google]]'s top news search results, were shared widely on [[Facebook]], were taken seriously and shared by third parties such as [[Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016|Trump presidential campaign]] manager [[Corey Lewandowski]], [[Eric Trump]], [[ABC News]] and the [[Fox News Channel]].<ref name=politfact>((cite news|last1=Jacobson|first1=Louis|title=No, someone wasn't paid $3,500 to protest Donald Trump|url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/nov/17/blog-posting/no-someone-wasnt-paid-3500-protest-donald-trump-it/|work=[[PolitiFact.com]]|date=November 17, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news|last1=Daro|first1=Ishmael N.|title=How a prankster convinced people the Amish wpuld win Trump the election|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/ishmaeldaro/paul-horner-amish-trump-vote-hoax|publisher=[[BuzzFeed]]|date=October 28, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite web|last1=French|first1=Sally|title=This person makes $10,000 a month writing fake news|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-person-makes-10000-a-month-writing-fake-news-2016-11-17|website=[[MarketWatch]]|date=November 18, 2016))</ref> Horner later claimed that the intention was "to make Trump's supporters look like idiots for sharing my stories".<ref name="bratu">((cite news|last1=Bratu|display-authors=etal|first1=Becky|title=Tall tale or satire? Authors of so-called 'fake news' feel misjudged|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tall-tale-or-satire-authors-so-called-fake-news-feel-n689421|work=[[NBC News]]|date=December 15, 2016))</ref>

In a November 2016 interview with ''[[The Washington Post]]'', Horner expressed regret for the role his fake news stories played in the election and surprise at how gullible people were in treating his stories as news.<ref name=hedegaard>((cite magazine |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/how-a-fake-newsman-accidentally-helped-trump-win-white-house-w452488 |title=How a fake newsman accidentally helped Trump win the White House – Paul Horner thought he was trolling Trump supporters – but after the election, the joke was on him |first=Erik |last=Hedegaard |date=November 29, 2016 |access-date=November 29, 2016 |archive-date=December 28, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171228141152/https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/how-a-fake-newsman-accidentally-helped-trump-win-white-house-w452488 |url-status=dead ))</ref><ref>((cite news|last1=Genzlinger| first1=Neil|title='Duck Dynasty' legacy: Real, fake and upfront about it|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/arts/television/duck-dynasty-legacy-real-fake-and-upfront-about-it.html|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=November 17, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news|last1=Madigan |first1=Charles M.|title=The danger of a leader who believes what 'people are saying'|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-fake-news-trump-facebook-media-perspec-1122-md-20161121-story.html|work=[[Chicago Tribune]] |date=November 21, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news|title=Comedian who writes fake news claims: Trump won the election because of me|url=http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/19988-comedian-who-writes-fake-news-claims-trump-won-the-election-because-of-me|work=Inside Edition|date=November 18, 2016))</ref> In February 2017 Horner said, ((blockquote|I truly regret my comment that I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me. I know all I did was attack him and his supporters and got people not to vote for him. When I said that comment it was because I was confused how this evil man got elected President and I thought maybe instead of hurting his campaign, maybe I had helped it. My intention was to get his supporters NOT to vote for him and I know for a fact that I accomplished that goal. The far right, a lot of the Bible thumpers and [[alt-right]] were going to vote him regardless, but I know I swayed so many that were on the fence.<ref>Welch, Dennis (February 16, 2017). [http://www.azfamily.com/story/34523534/fake-news-writer-regrets-taking-credit-for-trump-victory?autostart=true "Fake news writer 'regrets' taking credit for Trump victory"] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170720143132/http://www.azfamily.com/story/34523534/fake-news-writer-regrets-taking-credit-for-trump-victory?autostart=true |date=July 20, 2017 )). [[KTVK]].</ref>))

In 2017, Horner stated that a fake story of his about a rape festival in India helped generate over $250,000 in donations to GiveIndia, a site that helps rape victims in India.<ref>Daro, Ishmael N. (March 9, 2017). [https://www.buzzfeed.com/ishmaeldaro/rt-fake-news-debate-paul-horner-winston-mckenzie "A live TV debate about fake news went completely off the rails and it was amazing to watch"]. [[BuzzFeed]].</ref><ref>Nashrulla, Tasneem (November 8, 2013). [https://www.buzzfeed.com/tasneemnashrulla/an-american-website-wrote-a-satirical-article-about-an-india "An American website wrote a satirical article about an Indian rape festival and many people thought it was real"]. BuzzFeed.</ref><ref>Madan, Karuna (November 21, 2013). [http://gulfnews.com/news/asia/india/us-website-s-rape-festival-report-sparks-uproar-1.1257892 "US website's 'rape festival' report sparks uproar"]. ''Gulf News India''.</ref> Horner said he dislikes being grouped with people who write fake news solely to be misleading. "They just write it just to write fake news, like there's no purpose, there's no satire, there's nothing clever.

== Donald Trump and hoax news ==
((See also|False or misleading statements by Donald Trump))

[[File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg|thumb|Donald Trump frequently mentioned fake news on Twitter to criticize the media in the United States, including [[CNN]] and ''[[The New York Times]]''.]]

The term ''fake news'' has at times been used to cast doubt upon credible news. Throughout his campaign and presidency, former U.S. president [[Donald Trump]] has misused the term numerous times, using it to describe any negative press coverage of himself he personally dislikes rather than actual false news.<ref name="Lind_5/9/2018"/><ref>((cite web|url=http://libraryguides.vu.edu.au/c.php?g=460840&p=5330649|title=Library guides: Evaluating information: Fake news in the 2016 US Elections|last=Murphy|first=Jennifer| website=libraryguides.vu.edu.au| access-date=August 12, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite journal|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cognitive-ability-and-vulnerability-to-fake-news/|last1 = Hambrick | first1 = David Z.|last2 = Marquardt | first2 = Madeline | title = Cognitive ability and vulnerability to fake news | journal = Scientific American |date=February 6, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/18/donald-trumps-fake-news-mistake-216480|title=Donald Trump's fake news mistake|website=[[Politico]]|date=January 18, 2018 |access-date=April 24, 2018))</ref> Trump has claimed that the mainstream American media (which he calls the "[[lying press]]") regularly reports "fake news" or "hoax news", despite the fact that he generated considerable false and inaccurate or misleading statements himself.<ref>[https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/the-ongoing-challenge-to-define-free-speech/getting-to-the-truth/ Getting to the truth: Fake news, libel laws, and "Enemies of the American people"], [[American Bar Association]]</ref><ref name="NYT-20170623">((cite news |last1=Leonhardt |first1=David |last2=Thompson |first2=Stuart A.|title=Trump's lies |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=June 23, 2017 |access-date=June 23, 2017 ))</ref> According to ''The Washington Post''(('))s Fact Checker's database, Trump made 30,573 false or misleading claims during his four years in office, though the number of ''unique'' false claims is much lower because many of his major false claims were repeated hundreds of times each. A searchable online database is available for each documented false claim, and a datafile is available for download for use in academic studies of misinformation and lying.<ref name="WaPo_1/20/2021">((cite news | title=Analysis - Tracking all of President Trump's false or misleading claims | newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] | date=January 20, 2021 | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/ | access-date=March 13, 2022))</ref> An analysis of the first 16,000 false claims is available as a book.<ref>((Citation | last1=Kessler | first1= Glenn | last2=Rizzo | first2= Salvador | last3=Kelly | first3= Meg | title = Donald Trump and his assault on truth: The president's falsehoods, misleading claims and flat-out lies (Washington Post Fact Checker Staff) | publisher = Scribner / Simon & Schuster | year=2020 | isbn = 9781982151072 ))</ref>

Trump has often attacked mainstream news reporting publications, deeming them "fake news" and the "[[enemy of the people]]".<ref name="Pak_Seyler_7/19/2018">((cite web |last1=Pak |first1=Nataly |last2=Seyler |first2=Matt |title=Trump derides news media as 'enemy of the people' over Putin summit coverage |website=[[ABC News]] |date=July 19, 2018 |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-calls-fake-news-media-real-enemy-people/story?id=56687436 |access-date=July 23, 2018))</ref><ref name="Atkins_2/27/2017">((cite web |last=Atkins |first=Larry |title=Facts still matter in the age of Trump and fake news |website=The Hill |date=February 27, 2017 |url=http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/321406-facts-still-matter-in-the-age-of-trump-and-fake-news |access-date=March 9, 2017))</ref><ref name="Felsenthal_3/2/2017">((cite web |last=Felsenthal |first=Julia |title=How the women of the White House Press Corps are navigating "fake news" and "alternative facts" |website=Vogue |date=March 3, 2017 |url=http://www.vogue.com/projects/13528783/american-women-female-white-house-reporters-political-journalism/ | access-date=March 3, 2017))</ref><ref name="Massie_2/7/2017">((cite news |last=Massie |first=Chris |title=WH official: We'll say 'fake news' until media realizes attitude of attacking the President is wrong |website=CNN |date=February 7, 2017 |url=http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/kfile-gorka-on-fake-news/index.html |access-date=March 27, 2017))</ref><ref name="Page_2/7/2017">((cite web |last=Page |first=Clarence |date=February 7, 2017 |title=Trump's obsession with (his own) 'fake news' |website=Chicago Tribune |url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/page/ct-trump-lies-fake-news-kellyanne-conway-perspec-20170207-column.html | access-date=February 9, 2017))</ref> Every few days, Trump would issue a threat against the press due to his claims of "fake news". There have been many instances in which norms that protect press freedom have been pushed or even upended during the Trump-era.<ref>((Cite web|last = Nelson | first = Jacob L. | title=Tracking Trump-era assault on press norms| url=https://www.cjr.org/watchdog/tracking-trump-assault-press-freedom-media-attack.php| date = January 31, 2017 |website=Columbia Journalism Review ))</ref>

According to Jeff Hemsley, a [[Syracuse University]] professor who studies social media, Trump uses this term for any news that is not favorable to him or which he simply dislikes.<ref name="Gendreau_2/25/2017">((cite magazine |last=Gendreau |first=Henri |date=February 25, 2017 |title=The internet made 'fake news' a thing—then made it nothing |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |url=https://www.wired.com/2017/02/internet-made-fake-news-thing-made-nothing/ |access-date=May 9, 2018))</ref> Trump provided a widely cited<ref name="Cillizza_5/9/2018"/><ref name="Lind_5/9/2018"/><ref name="Chait_5/9/2018"/><ref name="Bump_5/9/2018"/> example of this interpretation in a tweet on May 9, 2018:

((tweet|block=yes|text=The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials? |date=May 9, 2018 |name=Donald J. Trump |username=realDonaldTrump |id=994179864436596736 |access-date=May 9, 2018))
[[Chris Cillizza]] described the tweet on CNN as an "accidental" revelation about Trump's "'fake news' attacks", and wrote: "The point can be summed up in these two words from Trump: 'negative (Fake).' To Trump, those words mean the same thing. Negative news coverage is fake news. Fake news is negative news coverage."<ref name="Cillizza_5/9/2018">((cite news |last=Cillizza |first=Chris |title=Donald Trump just accidentally revealed something very important about his 'fake news' attacks |website=[[CNN]] |date=May 9, 2018 |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/09/politics/donald-trump-media-tweet/index.html |access-date=May 10, 2018))</ref> Other writers made similar comments about the tweet. Dara Lind wrote in ''[[Vox (website)|Vox]]'': "It's nice of Trump to admit, explicitly, what many skeptics have suspected all along: When he complains about 'fake news,' he doesn't actually mean 'news that is untrue'; he means news that is personally inconvenient to Donald Trump."<ref name="Lind_5/9/2018">((cite web |last=Lind |first=Dara |title=Trump finally admits that "fake news" just means news he doesn't like |website=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |date=May 9, 2018 |url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/5/9/17335306/trump-tweet-twitter-latest-fake-news-credentials | access-date=May 10, 2018))</ref> [[Jonathan Chait]] wrote in ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]'' magazine: "Trump admits he calls all negative news 'fake'.": "In a tweet this morning, Trump casually opened a window into the source code for his method of identifying liberal media bias. Anything that's negative is, by definition, fake."<ref name="Chait_5/9/2018">((cite web |last=Chait |first=Jonathan |title=Trump admits he calls all negative news 'fake' |website=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] magazine |date=May 9, 2018 |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/trump-admits-he-calls-all-negative-news-fake.html |access-date=May 10, 2018))</ref> Philip Bump wrote in ''[[The Washington Post]]'': "The important thing in that tweet((nbsp))... is that he makes explicit his view of what constitutes fake news. It's negative news. Negative. (Fake.)"<ref name="Bump_5/9/2018">((cite news |last=Bump |first=Philip |title=Trump makes it explicit: Negative coverage of him is fake coverage |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=May 9, 2018 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/09/trump-makes-it-explicit-negative-coverage-of-him-is-fake-coverage/ |access-date=May 10, 2018))</ref> In an interview with [[Lesley Stahl]], before the cameras were turned on, Trump explained why he attacks the press: "You know why I do it? I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so that when you write negative stories about me no one will believe you."<ref name="Mangan_5/22/2018">((cite web |last=Mangan |first=Dan |title=Trump told Lesley Stahl he bashes press so 'no one will believe' negative stories about him |website=[[CNBC]] |date=May 22, 2018 |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/22/trump-told-lesley-stahl-he-bashes-press-to-discredit-negative-stories.html |access-date=May 30, 2018))</ref>

Author and literary critic [[Michiko Kakutani]] has described developments in the right-wing media and websites:

((quote box|"Fox News and the planetary system of right-wing news sites that would orbit it and, later, [[Breitbart]], were particularly adept at weaponizing such arguments and exploiting the increasingly partisan fervor animating the Republican base: They accused the media establishment of 'liberal bias', and substituted their own right-wing views as 'fair and balanced'—a redefinition of terms that was a harbinger of Trump's hijacking of 'fake news' to refer not to alt-right conspiracy theories and Russian troll posts, but to real news that he perceived as inconvenient or a threat to himself."<ref name="Woods_6/20/2018">((cite magazine |last=Woods |first=Sean |title=Michiko Kakutani on Her Essential New Book 'The Death of Truth' |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |date=June 20, 2018 |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/michiko-kakutani-on-her-essential-new-book-the-death-of-truth-666137/ |access-date=July 23, 2018))</ref>
))

In September 2018, [[National Public Radio]] noted that Trump has expanded his use of the terms ''fake'' and ''phony'' to "an increasingly wide variety of things he doesn't like": "The range of things Trump is declaring fake is growing too. Last month he tweeted about "fake books," "the fake dossier," "fake CNN," and he added a new claim—that Google search results are "RIGGED" to mostly show only negative stories about him." They graphed his expanding use in columns labeled: "Fake news", "Fake (other) and "Phony".<ref name="Keith_9/4/2018">((cite web |last=Keith |first=Tamara |title=President Trump's description of what's 'fake' is expanding |website=[[NPR]] |date=September 2, 2018 |url=https://www.npr.org/2018/09/02/643761979/president-trumps-description-of-whats-fake-is-expanding |access-date=September 4, 2018))</ref>

== By country ==
=== Europe ===
==== Austria ====
Politicians in Austria dealt with the impact of fake news and its spread on social media after the 2016 presidential campaign in the country. In December 2016, a court in Austria issued an injunction on Facebook Europe, mandating it block negative postings related to [[Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek]], [[Austrian Green Party]] Chairwoman. According to ''The Washington Post'' the postings to Facebook about her "appeared to have been spread via a fake profile" and directed derogatory epithets towards the Austrian politician.<ref name=":0">Kirchner, Stephanie (December 14, 2016), [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/12/14/menace-of-fake-news-is-rattling-politicians-in-austria-and-germany "Menace of fake news is rattling politicians in Austria and Germany"], ''[[The Washington Post]]'', retrieved December 14, 2016.</ref> The derogatory postings were likely created by the identical fake profile that had previously been utilized to attack [[Alexander van der Bellen]], who won the election for [[President of Austria]].<ref name=":0" />

==== Belgium ====
((main|Flemish Secession hoax))
In 2006, French-speaking broadcaster [[RTBF]] showed a fictional breaking special news report that Belgium's [[Flemish Region]] had proclaimed independence. Staged footage of the [[Belgian royal family|royal family]] evacuating and the Belgian flag being lowered from a pole were made to add credence to the report. It was not until 30 minutes into the report that a sign stating "Fiction" appeared on screen. The RTBF journalist that created the hoax said the purpose was to demonstrate the magnitude of the country's situation and if a partition of Belgium was to really happen.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.rtbf.be/info/medias/detail_bye-bye-belgium-en-2006-le-docu-fiction-de-la-rtbf-creait-un-electrochoc?id=9479103 |title=Bye Bye Belgium: en 2006, le docu-fiction de la RTBF créait un électrochoc |date=December 12, 2016 |publisher=Rtbf.be |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref>

==== Czech Republic ====
((See also|Centre Against Terrorism and Hybrid Threats))
Fake news outlets in the Czech Republic redistribute news in Czech and English originally produced by Russian sources. Czech president [[Miloš Zeman]] has been supporting media outlets accused of spreading fake news.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://euobserver.com/beyond-brussels/138638|title=Business booming in Czech fake news industry|access-date=July 31, 2017|language=en))</ref>

The ''Centre Against Terrorism and Hybrid Threats'' (CTHH) is unit of the [[Ministry of the Interior (Czech Republic)|Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic]] primarily aimed at countering disinformation, fake news, [[hoax]]es and foreign [[propaganda]]. The CTHH started operations on January 1, 2017. The CTHH has been criticized by Czech President [[Miloš Zeman]], who said: "We don't need censorship. We don't need thought police. We don't need a new agency for press and information as long as we want to live in a free and democratic society."<ref>"[http://www.skynews.com.au/news/world/europe/2017/01/02/czech-republic-open-centre-to-fight-fake-news.html Czech Republic open centre to fight fake news] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170427101810/http://www.skynews.com.au/news/world/europe/2017/01/02/czech-republic-open-centre-to-fight-fake-news.html |date=April 27, 2017 ))". [[Sky News]]. January 2, 2017.</ref>

In 2017 media activists started a website, Konspiratori.cz, maintaining a list of conspiracy and fake news outlets in Czech.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.konspiratori.sk/zoznam-stranok.php|title=konspiratori.sk|website=konspiratori.sk|access-date=July 31, 2017|archive-date=December 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201220034742/https://www.konspiratori.sk/zoznam-stranok.php|url-status=dead))</ref>

==== European Union ====
In 2018 the [[European Commission]] introduced a first voluntary [[EU Code of Practice on Disinformation|code of practice on disinformation]]. In 2022 this will become a strengthen co-regulation scheme, with responsibility shared between the regulators and companies signatory to the code. It will complement the earlier [[Digital Services Act]] agreed on by the 27-country European Union, which already includes a section on combating disinformation.<ref>[https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-facebook-twitter-will-have-tackle-deepfakes-or-risk-eu-fines-sources-2022-06-13/ Exclusive: Google, Facebook, Twitter to tackle deepfakes or risk EU fines], Reuters</ref><ref>[https://www.reuters.com/technology/meta-google-twitter-pledge-better-fight-fake-news-or-risk-fines-2022-06-16/ Meta, Google, Twitter vow to fight fake news better as EU gets tougher], Reuters</ref>((Update inline|date=March 2024))

==== Finland ====
Officials from 11 countries met in [[Helsinki]] in November 2016 and planned the formation of a center to combat disinformation cyber-warfare, which includes the spread of fake news on social media. The center is planned to be located in Helsinki and combine efforts from 10 countries, including Sweden, Germany, Finland and the U.S. [[Juha Sipilä]], [[Prime Minister of Finland]] from 2015 to 2019, planned to address the topic of the center in Spring 2017 with a motion before [[Parliament of Finland|Parliament]].((Update inline|date=March 2024))

Deputy Secretary of State for EU Affairs Jori Arvonen said cyber-warfare, such as hybrid cyber-warfare intrusions into Finland from Russia and the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|Islamic State]], became an increasing problem in 2016. Arvonen cited examples including online fake news, disinformation, and the "[[Little green men (Russo-Ukrainian War)|little green men]]" of the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]].<ref>[http://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/helsinki_to_host_hub_aimed_at_curbing_cyber_warfare_threats/9307244 "Helsinki to host hub aimed at curbing cyber warfare threats"], ''[[Yle]]'', November 21, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016.</ref>

==== France ====
During the ten-year period preceding 2016, France was witness to an increase in popularity of [[far-right]] alternative news sources called the ((Lang|fr|fachosphere)) (((Lang|fr|facho)) referring to [[fascist]]); known as the ((ill|extreme right on the Internet|fr|Extrême droite sur Internet)).<ref name=Guardian12.2.16/> According to sociologist Antoine Bevort, citing data from [[Alexa Internet]] rankings, the most consulted political websites in France in 2016 included ''[[Égalité et Réconciliation]]'', ''((ill|François Desouche|fr))'', and ''Les Moutons Enragés''.<ref>((cite news|last1=Bivort|first1= Antoine |date=October 21, 2016|url=https://blogs.mediapart.fr/antoine-bevort/blog/211016/les-trente-sites-politiques-francais-ayant-le-plus-d-audience-sur-le-web-0|title=Les trente sites politiques français ayant le plus d'audience sur le Web|newspaper=Mediapart|access-date= December 11, 2016))</ref><ref>((cite news |last=Bevort |first=Antoine |date=December 1, 2016 |url=https://blogs.mediapart.fr/antoine-bevort/blog/011216/fake-traffic-quelle-fiabilite-pour-le-classement-des-sites-socio-politiques |title="Fake Traffic" ? Quelle fiabilité pour le classement des sites socio-politiques? |language=fr |publisher=[[Mediapart]] |access-date=December 11, 2016))</ref> These sites increased skepticism towards [[mainstream media]] from both left and right perspectives.

In September 2016, the country faced controversy regarding fake websites providing false information about [[abortion]]. The [[National Assembly (France)|National Assembly]] moved forward with intentions to ban such fake sites. [[Laurence Rossignol]], women's minister for France, informed parliament though the fake sites look neutral, in actuality their intentions were specifically targeted to give women fake information.

2017 presidential election.
France saw an uptick in amounts of disinformation and propaganda, primarily in the midst of election cycles. A study looking at the diffusion of political news during the 2017 presidential election cycle suggests that one in four links shared in social media comes from sources that actively contest traditional media narratives.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.bakamosocial.com/frenchelection |title=The role and impact of non-traditional publishers in the French Elections 2017|publisher=Bakamo Social|access-date=April 20, 2017))</ref> [[Facebook]] corporate deleted 30,000 Facebook accounts in France associated with fake political information.<ref name="indepfr">((cite news|last1=Farand|first1=C|date=April 22, 2017|title=French social media awash with fake news stories from sources 'exposed to Russian influence' ahead of presidential election|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/french-social-media-flooded-fake-112100880.html))</ref>

In April 2017, [[Emmanuel Macron]]'s presidential campaign was attacked by the fake news articles more than the campaigns of conservative candidate [[Marine Le Pen]] and socialist candidate [[Benoît Hamon]].<ref>((cite web|last1=Toor|first1=A.|date=April 21, 2017 |title=France has a fake news problem, but it's not as bad as the US| url=https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/21/15381422/france-fake-news-election-russia-oxford-study))</ref> One of the fake articles even announced that Le Pen won the presidency before the people of France had even voted.<ref name=indepfr /> Macron's professional and private emails, as well as memos, contracts and accounting documents were posted on a file-sharing website. The leaked documents were mixed with fake ones in social media in an attempt to sway the upcoming presidential election.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/06/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-hacking-attack-what-we-know-and-dont-know.html|title=Macron hacking attack: What we know and don't know|last=Morenne|first=Benoît|date=May 6, 2017|work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=May 10, 2017|quote=The campaign said that all of the stolen documents were 'legal' and 'authentic' but that fake ones had been added to 'sow doubt and disinformation'.))</ref> Macron said he would combat fake news of the sort that had been spread during his election campaign.<ref>((cite web|last1=Romm|first1=T. |date=May 7, 2017|title=A 'fake news' crackdown could follow Macron's election win in France|url=https://www.recode.net/2017/5/7/15573826/macron-france-election-win-fake-news-crackdown-social-media-misinformation))</ref>

Initially, the leak was attributed to [[Fancy Bear|APT28]], a group tied to Russia's GRU military intelligence directorate.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-leaks-hack-en-marche-cyber-attack-russia-dnc-marine-le-pen-election-france-latest-a7721796.html|title=Macron email leak 'linked to same Russian-backed hackers who attacked Clinton'|date=May 6, 2017|work=[[The Independent]]|access-date=May 10, 2017))</ref> However, the head of the French cyber-security agency, [[Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information|ANSSI]], later said that there was no evidence that the hack leading to the leaks had anything to do with Russia, saying that the attack was so simple, that "we can imagine that it was a person who did this alone. They could be in any country."<ref>((cite news|url=http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/336034-no-evidence-of-russia-behind-marcon-leaks-report|title=No evidence of Russia behind Macron leaks: report|work=The Hill|date=June 1, 2017|language=en))</ref>

==== Germany ====
[[Chancellor of Germany|German Chancellor]] [[Angela Merkel]] lamented the problem of fraudulent news reports in a November 2016 speech, days after announcing her campaign for a fourth term as leader of her country. In a speech to the German parliament, Merkel was critical of such fake sites, saying they harmed political discussion. Merkel called attention to the need of government to deal with [[Internet troll]]s, bots, and fake news websites. She warned that such fraudulent news websites were a force increasing the power of [[Populism|populist]] extremism. Merkel called fraudulent news a growing phenomenon that might need to be regulated in the future. The head of Germany's foreign intelligence agency [[Federal Intelligence Service (Germany)|Federal Intelligence Service]], [[Bruno Kahl]], warned of the potential for [[cyberattacks]] by Russia in the [[2017 German federal election|2017 German election]]. He said the cyberattacks would take the form of the intentional spread of disinformation. Kahl said the goal is to increase chaos in political debates. Germany's domestic intelligence agency [[Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution]] Chief, [[Hans-Georg Maassen]], said sabotage by Russian intelligence was a present threat to German [[information security]].<ref>Murdock, Jason (November 30, 2016), [http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russian-hackers-may-disrupt-germanys-2017-election-warns-spy-chief-1594221 "Russian hackers may disrupt Germany's 2017 election warns spy chief"], ''[[International Business Times|International Business Times UK edition]]'', retrieved December 1, 2016.</ref> German government officials and security experts later said there was no Russian interference during the 2017 German federal election.<ref>"[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-cyber/germany-sees-no-sign-of-cyber-attack-before-sept-24-election-idUSKCN1BU2KE Germany sees no sign of cyber attack before Sept. 24 election]". Reuters. September 19, 2017.</ref> The German term ((Lang|de|Lügenpresse)), or [[lying press]], has been used since the 19th century and specifically during World War One as a strategy to attack news spread by political opponents in the 19th and 20th century.<ref>((cite news |last1=Kirschbaum |first1=Erik |title=Revived Nazi-era term 'Luegenpresse' is German non-word of year |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-islam-protests/revived-nazi-era-term-luegenpresse-is-german-non-word-of-year-idUSKBN0KM21F20150113 |website=Reuters |date=January 13, 2015 |agency=Reuters |access-date=February 19, 2019))</ref>

The award-winning German journalist [[Claas Relotius]] resigned from ((lang|de|[[Der Spiegel]])) in 2018 after admitting numerous instances of [[journalistic fraud]].<ref>((cite news |title=Award-winning journalist at Der Spiegel admits making up stories including interview with Colin Kaepernick's parents |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/der-spiegel-reporter-fake-stories-claas-relotius-journalist-made-up-interviews-fabricated-a8692006.html |work=The Independent |date=December 20, 2018))</ref>

In early April 2020, Berlin politician [[Andreas Geisel]] alleged that a shipment of 200,000 N95 masks that it had ordered from American producer [[3M]]'s China facility were intercepted in [[Bangkok]] and diverted to the United States during the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]. [[Berlin Police|Berlin police]] president ((ill|Barbara Slowik|de|vertical-align=sup)) stated that she believed "this is related to the US government's export ban."<ref>((cite news |url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/usa-fangen-200-000-schutzmasken-ab-berlins-innensenator-spricht-von-moderner-piraterie/25712976.html |title=Berlins Innensenator spricht von "moderner Piraterie" |first1=Julius |last1=Betschka |first2=Alexander |last2=Fröhlich |date=April 3, 2020 |newspaper=[[Der Tagesspiegel]] |language=de))</ref> However, Berlin police confirmed that the shipment was not seized by U.S. authorities, but was said to have simply been bought at a better price, widely believed to be from a German dealer or China.<ref name="GWFWD">((cite news|url=https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/200-000-atemschutzmasken-doch-nicht-konfisziert-lieferung-fuer-berliner-polizei-wurde-in-thailand-zu-besserem-preis-aufgekauft/25715448.html |title=200,000 respirators not confiscated: Delivery for Berlin police was bought in Thailand at a better price|first=Alexander|last=Fröhlich|date=April 4, 2020 |newspaper=[[Der Tagesspiegel]]|language=en))</ref><ref>((cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/12/us-global-reputation-rock-bottom-donald-trump-coronavirus|title=US's global reputation hits rock-bottom over Trump's coronavirus response|first1=Simon|last1=Tisdall|date=April 12, 2020|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]))</ref> This revelation outraged the Berlin opposition, whose [[Christian Democratic Union of Germany|CDU]] parliamentary group leader Burkard Dregger accused Geisel of "deliberately misleading Berliners" in order "to cover up its own inability to obtain protective equipment". [[Free Democratic Party (Germany)|FDP]] interior expert Marcel Luthe said "Big names in international politics like Berlin's senator Geisel are blaming others and telling US piracy to serve anti-American clichés."<ref name="GWFWD"/> ''[[Politico Europe]]'' reported that "the Berliners are taking a page straight out of the Trump playbook and not letting facts get in the way of a good story."<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/berlin-lets-mask-slip-on-feelings-for-trumps-america/|title=Berlin lets mask slip on feelings for Trump's America|date=April 10, 2020|newspaper=[[Politico Europe]]))</ref>

==== Hungary ====
Hungary's illiberal and populist prime minister [[Viktor Orbán]] has cast [[George Soros]], financier and philanthropist, a Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor, as the mastermind of a plot to undermine the country's sovereignty, replace native Hungarians with immigrants and destroy traditional values. This propaganda technique, together with [[Antisemitism|anti-Semitism]] still present in the country, seems to appeal to his right-wing voters, as it mobilizes them by seeding fear in society, creating an enemy image and enabling Orbán to present himself as the protector of the nation from the illusion of this enemy.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/10/world/europe/trump-truth-lies-power.html|title=The Art of the Lie? The Bigger the Better|newspaper=The New York Times|date=January 10, 2021|last1=Higgins|first1=Andrew))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/world/europe/soros-orban-hungary-eu-central-european-university.html|title = Chided by Brussels, Hungary's leader attacks George Soros|newspaper = The New York Times|date = April 26, 2017|last1 = Karasz|first1 = Palko))</ref>

==== Italy ====
Journalists must be registered with the ((Lang|it|Ordine Dei Giornalisti)) (ODG) (((Gloss|Order of Journalists))) and respect its disciplinary and training obligations, to guarantee "correct and truthful information, intended as right of individuals and of the community".<ref>[http://old.odg.it/content/poteri-di-vigilanza ODG] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220302183547/http://old.odg.it/content/poteri-di-vigilanza |date=March 2, 2022 )).</ref><ref>[https://www.odg.it/faq-formazione-continua ODG].</ref>

Under certain circumstances, spreading fake news may constitute a criminal offence under the Italian penal code.<ref>[https://www.agendadigitale.eu/cultura-digitale/fake-news-cosa-rischia-lutente-tutte-le-leggi-violate-i-reati-e-gli-illeciti/ Agenda Digitale].</ref><ref>[https://lamagistratura.it/penale-e-sorveglianza/reati-dove-le-fake-news-costituiscono-la-condotta-incriminata-lart-656-c-p/ La Magistratura].</ref><ref>[https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/divulgazione-di-notizie-false_%28Diritto-on-line%29/ Treccani].</ref>

Since 2018 it is possible to report fake news directly on the [[Polizia di Stato]] website.<ref>[https://www.interno.gov.it/it/notizie/progetto-red-button-contro-fake-news by "Red Button" project at first, active in 2018 only].</ref><ref>[https://www.interno.gov.it/it/notizie/coronavirus-e-fakenews-attenzione-notizie-false by commissariatodips.it, still active today].</ref>

The phenomenon is monitored by the [[Dipartimento delle Informazioni per la Sicurezza|DIS]], supported by [[AISE]] and [[Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna|AISI]].<ref>[https://www.ilmessaggero.it/italia/propaganda_pro_putin_italia_dossier_servizi_segreti_gabrielli-6745705.html?refresh_ce Il Messaggero].</ref><ref>[https://www.corriere.it/politica/22_giugno_10/gabrielli-ne-dossieraggi-ne-grande-fratello-fake-news-non-sono-opinioni-e3934a58-e8dc-11ec-a288-5db7a6019886.shtml Corriere della Sera].</ref><ref>[https://www.ansa.it/documents/1654869820652_bollettino.pdf ANSA].</ref>

==== Netherlands ====
In March 2018, the [[European Union]]'s [[East StratCom Task Force]] compiled a list dubbed a "hall of shame" of articles with suspected [[Moscow Kremlin|Kremlin]] attempts to influence political decisions.<ref name="auto13">((cite news |last1=Birnbaum |first1=Michael |title=Europe wants to crack down on fake news. But one person's fake news is another's democratic dissent |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-want-to-crack-down-on-fake-news-but-one-persons-fake-news-is-anothers-democratic-dissent/2018/04/25/a9f49738-432d-11e8-b2dc-b0a403e4720a_story.html |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=April 25, 2018 ))</ref> However, controversy arose when three Dutch media outlets claimed they had been wrongfully singled out because of quotes attributed to people with non-mainstream views.<ref name="auto13"/> The news outlets included [[w:nl:ThePostOnline|ThePostOnline]], ''[[GeenStijl]]'', and ''[[De Gelderlander]]''.<ref name="auto13"/> All three were flagged for publishing articles critical of [[Ukraine|Ukrainian]] policies, and none received any forewarning or opportunity to appeal beforehand.<ref name="auto13"/> This incident has contributed to the growing issue of what defines news as fake, and how freedoms of press and speech can be protected during attempts to curb the spread of false news.

==== Poland ====
Polish historian Jerzy Targalski noted fake news websites had infiltrated Poland through [[anti-establishment]] and [[right-wing]] sources that copied content from ''[[Russia Today]]''. Targalski observed there existed about 20 specific fake news websites in Poland that spread Russian disinformation in the form of fake news. One example cited was fake news that [[Ukraine]] announced the Polish city of [[Przemyśl]] as occupied Polish land.<ref>[http://www.thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/280476,Russian-propaganda-entering-mainstream-news-disinformation-experts "Russian propaganda entering mainstream news: disinformation experts"] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161217103454/http://www.thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/280476,Russian-propaganda-entering-mainstream-news-disinformation-experts |date=December 17, 2016 )), ''[[Radio Poland]]'', November 18, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016.</ref>

[[Poland]]'s anti-EU [[Law and Justice]] (PiS) government has been accused of spreading "illiberal disinformation" to undermine public confidence in the [[European Union]].<ref name="fp">"[https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/30/the-real-russian-threat-to-central-eastern-europe-2/ The Real Russian Threat to Central Eastern Europe]". ''[[Foreign Policy]]''. March 30, 2017.</ref> Maria Snegovaya of Columbia University said: "The true origins of this phenomenon are local. The policies of Fidesz and Law and Justice have a lot in common with Putin's own policies."<ref name="fp"/>

Some mainstream outlets have long been accused of fabricating half-true or outright false information. In 2010 one popular TV station, TVN, attributed to Jarosław Kaczyński (then an opposition leader) the quote that "there will be times when true Poles will come to power".<ref name="jktvn">((Cite web |date=2010-10-12 |title=PiS: Niech TVN nas przeprosi. TVN: Kto tu manipuluje |url=https://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/polityka/artykuly/305074,pis-niech-tvn-nas-przeprosi-tvn-kto-tu-manipuluje.html |access-date=2024-03-21 |website=dziennik.pl |language=pl))</ref> However, Kaczyński has never uttered those words in the commented speech.

==== Romania ====
On March 16, 2020, [[Romania]]n President [[Klaus Iohannis]] signed an emergency decree, giving authorities the power to remove, report or close websites spreading "fake news" about the COVID-19 pandemic, with no opportunity to appeal.<ref>((cite news |title=Romania's Drive to Censor 'Fake News' Worries Activists |url=https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/27/romanias-drive-to-censor-fake-news-worries-activists |work=[[Balkan Insight]] |date=April 27, 2020))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=COVID-19: restrictions on access to information in Romania |url=https://europeanjournalists.org/blog/2020/03/29/covid-19-restrictions-on-access-to-information-in-romania |work=[[European Federation of Journalists]] |date=March 29, 2020))</ref>

==== Russia ====
((main|Russian fake news laws))
((see also|Russian 2019 Fake News Law))
((see also|Russian 2020 COVID-19 Fake News Law))
((see also|Russian 2022 war censorship laws))
In March 2019, Russia passed a [[Russian 2019 Fake News Law|new bill]] to ban websites from spreading false information.<ref>((cite web|url=https://blog.acton.org/archives/108381-russia-bans-fake-news-a-lesson-in-unintended-consequences.html|title=Russia bans fake news: A lesson in unintended consequences|first1=Rev Ben |last1=Johnson|date=April 30, 2019|website=Acton Institute PowerBlog|language=en-US|access-date=April 30, 2019))</ref> In addition to tackling fake news, the [[Russian 2019 Disrespect to Authorities Law|new legislation]] specifically punishes any sources or websites for publishing materials that insult the state, the symbol of the government or other political figures. For repeated offenders, they would receive a 15-day jail sentence.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/russia-passes-legislation-banning-state-criticism-fake-news-190307194308089.html|title=Russia passes legislation banning state criticism, fake news|website=www.aljazeera.com|access-date=April 30, 2019))</ref>

During the [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]], the Russian government [[Russian 2022 war censorship laws|passed a law prohibiting "fake news"]] regarding the Russian military, which was broadly defined as any information that is deemed by the Russian government to be false, including the use of the terms ''invasion'' and ''war'' to refer to the invasion.<ref>((cite web |last1=Tebor |first1=Celina |title=Russia increases censorship with new law: 15 years in jail for calling Ukraine invasion a 'war' |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/ukraine/2022/03/08/russia-free-speech-press-criminalization-misinformation/9433112002/ |website=[[USA Today]] |access-date=March 13, 2022))</ref><ref>((cite web |title=Russia Criminalizes Independent War Reporting, Anti-War Protests |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/03/07/russia-criminalizes-independent-war-reporting-anti-war-protests |website=[[Human Rights Watch]] |access-date=March 7, 2022 |language=en |date=March 7, 2022))</ref> Violations of the law are punishable with up to 15 years of imprisonment. International news organizations in multiple countries ceased operating in Russia and journalists emigrated from Russia en masse after the law was passed, while some domestic non-state news organizations were blocked by the Russian government.<ref>((cite web |last1=Benton |first1=Joshua |author1-link=Joshua Benton |title="An information dark age": Russia's new "fake news" law has outlawed most independent journalism there |url=https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/03/an-information-dark-age-russias-new-fake-news-law-has-outlawed-most-independent-journalism-there/ |website=[[Nieman Lab]] |access-date=March 13, 2022 |date=March 7, 2022))</ref><ref>((cite web |title=Over 150 Journalists Flee Russia Amid Wartime Crackdown On Free Press – Reports |url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/03/07/over-150-journalists-flee-russia-amid-wartime-crackdown-on-free-press-reports-a76809 |website=[[The Moscow Times]] |access-date=March 13, 2022 |language=en |date=March 7, 2022))</ref>

==== Serbia ====
In 2018, the [[International Research & Exchanges Board]] described the situation in Serbian media as the worst in recent history and stated that the [[Media Sustainability Index]] has dropped due to the most polarized media in almost 20 years, an increase in fake news and editorial pressure on media.<ref name=IREX>((cite web|url=https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/media-sustainability-index-europe-eurasia-2018-serbia.pdf/|title=Serbia, Media Sustainability Index|publisher=International Research & Exchanges Board|access-date=January 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708213326/https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/media-sustainability-index-europe-eurasia-2018-serbia.pdf|archive-date=July 8, 2019|url-status=dead))</ref> According to Serbian investigative journalism portal ''Crime and Corruption Reporting Network'', more than 700 fake news articles were published on the front pages of pro-government tabloids in 2018.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.stopfake.org/en/700-false-news-stories-in-serbian-tabloids-in-2018/|title=700 false news stories in Serbian tabloids in 2018|date=January 24, 2019|publisher=Stop Fake|access-date=February 8, 2019))</ref><ref name=KRIK>((cite web|url=https://www.raskrikavanje.rs/page.php?id=346|title=Više od 700 laži na naslovnim stranama tri tabloida u 2018. godini|publisher=Crime and Corruption Reporting Network|access-date=February 8, 2019))</ref> Many of them were about alleged attacks on president [[Aleksandar Vučić]] and [[Coup d'état|coup]] attempts, as well as messages of support to him by [[Vladimir Putin]].<ref name=KRIK /> The best-selling newspaper in Serbia is the pro-government tabloid ''[[Informer (newspaper)|Informer]]'', which most often presents Vučić as a powerful person under constant attack, and also features [[Euroscepticism|anti-European]] content and [[pro-war rhetoric]].<ref name=JovanovicSrdjanMladenov>((cite journal|last1=Jovanović|first1=Srđan Mladenov|title='You're simply the best': Communicating power and victimhood in support of President Aleksandar Vučić in the Serbian Dailies Alo! and Informer |journal=Journal of Media Research |date=2019|volume=11|issue=2|pages=22–42|doi=10.24193/jmr.31.2|doi-access=free))</ref><ref>((cite journal|last1=Drašković|first1=Brankica|last2=Prodanović| first2=Dragana|last3=Pavkov|first3=Ksenija|title=Antievropski diskurs i negativna slika Evropske unije u srpskim medijima|journal=CM: Communication and Media |date=2016|volume=11|pages=19–39| issue=38 | doi=10.5937/comman11-11847|doi-access=free))</ref><ref>((cite journal|last1=Janjić|first1=Stefan|last2=Šovanec|first2=Stefani|title=Najava rata na naslovnim stranama srpskih tabloida|journal=CM: Communication and Media |date=2018|volume=13|pages=49–67|doi=10.5937/comman13-14543|doi-access=free))</ref> Since Vučić's party came to power, Serbia has seen a surge of [[Internet trolls]] and pages on social networks praising the government and attacking its critics, free media and the opposition in general.<ref name=Breitbart>((cite web|url=https://balkaninsight.com/2019/03/29/fb-page-attacking-serbian-media-linked-to-breitbart/|title=FB page attacking Serbian media 'linked' to Breitbart|date=March 29, 2019|publisher=Balkan Insight|access-date=April 1, 2019))</ref> It includes a handful of dedicated employee-run fake accounts as well as the Facebook page associated with a Serbian franchise of the far-right [[Breitbart News]] website, which has disputed accuracy.<ref name=trolls>((cite web|last1=Bradshaw|first1=Samantha|last2=Howard|first2=Philip|author2-link=Philip N. Howard|title=Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global inventory of organized social media manipulation|work=[[Oxford Internet Institute]], Working Paper 2017.12|date=December 2017|url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cef7e8d9-27bf-4ea5-9fd6-855209b3e1f6/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=Troops-Trolls-and-Troublemakers.pdf&type_of_work=Report))</ref><ref name=Breitbart />

==== Spain ====
Fake news in Spain has become much more prevalent in the 2010s, but has been prominent throughout Spain's history. The United States government published a fake article in regards to the purchase of the [[Philippines]] from Spain, which they had already purchased.<ref>((cite web|url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/900457/fake-news-also-hounded-1896-philippine-revolution|title=Fake news also hounded 1896 Philippine revolution|last=Cabreza|first=Vincent|website=newsinfo.inquirer.net|date=May 29, 2017|language=en|access-date=June 5, 2017))</ref> Despite this, the topic of fake news has traditionally not been given much attention in Spain until the newspaper ''[[El País]]'' launched a blog dedicated strictly to truthful news, entitled ((Lang|es|Hechos)), meaning ((Gloss|facts)). David Alandete, the managing editor of ''El País'', stated that many people misinterpret fake news as real because the sites "have similar names, typography, layouts and are deliberately confusing".<ref name="auto6">((Cite news|url=https://digiday.com/uk/el-pais-tackling-fake-news/|title=How Spanish newspaper El Pais is tackling fake news |date=January 30, 2017|work=[[Digiday]]|access-date=June 5, 2017|language=en-US))</ref> Alandete made it the new mission of ''El País'' "to respond to fake news".<ref>((cite news |last1=Scott |first1=Mark |last2=Eddy |first2=Melissa |title=Europe Combats a New Foe of Political Stability: Fake News |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/world/europe/europe-combats-a-new-foe-of-political-stability-fake-news.html |work=The New York Times |date=February 20, 2017 ))</ref> María Ramírez of [[Univision Communications]] has stated that much of the political fake news circulating in Spain is due to the lack of investigative journalism on the topics. Most recently ''El País'' has created a fact-checking position for five employees, to try and debunk the fake news released.<ref name="auto6"/>

==== Sweden ====
The [[Swedish Security Service]] issued a report in 2015 identifying propaganda from Russia infiltrating Sweden with the objective to amplify pro-Russian propaganda and inflame societal conflicts. The [[Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency]] (MSB), part of the [[Ministry of Defence (Sweden)|Ministry of Defence of Sweden]], identified fake news reports targeting [[Sweden]] in 2016 that originated from Russia. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency official Mikael Tofvesson stated a pattern emerged where views critical of Sweden were constantly repeated. ''[[The Local]]'' identified these tactics as a form of [[psychological warfare]]. The newspaper reported the MSB identified ''[[Russia Today]]'' and ''[[Sputnik News]]'' as significant fake news purveyors. As a result of growth in this propaganda in Sweden, the MSB planned to hire six additional security officials to fight back against the campaign of fraudulent information.<ref>[http://www.thelocal.se/20160727/concern-over-barrage-of-fake-russian-news-in-sweden "Concern over barrage of fake Russian news in Sweden"], ''[[The Local]]'', July 27, 2016, retrieved November 25, 2016.</ref>

According to the [[Oxford Internet Institute]], eight of the top 10 "junk news" sources during the [[2018 Swedish general election]] campaign were Swedish, and "Russian sources comprised less than 1% of the total number of URLs shared in the data sample."<ref>((cite news |title=Fake news takes its toll on Sweden's elections |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-11-15/fake-news-roiled-sweden-s-elections-but-it-was-homegrown |publisher=Bloomberg |date=November 15, 2018))</ref>

==== Ukraine ====
Since [[Euromaidan]] and the beginning of the [[War in Donbas (2014–2022)|Ukrainian crisis]] in 2014, the Ukrainian media circulated several fake news stories and misleading images, including a photograph of a dead rebel with a [[Photoshopped]] tattoo which allegedly indicated that he belonged to Russian Special Forces<ref>((cite web |url= http://www.stopfake.org/en/ukrainian-site-censor-net-published-edited-photo-of-a-russian-soldier/ |title= Ukrainian site Censor.net published edited photo of a Russian soldier |website= StopFake.org |date= July 30, 2014 ))</ref> and the threat of a Russian nuclear attack against Ukrainian troops.<ref name=BlackJohns>((cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?isbn=131740954X |title=The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, The West and Russia|author=J. L. Black, Michael Johns|year=2016|publisher=Routledge))</ref> The recurring theme of these fake news stories was that Russia was solely to blame for the crisis and the war in Donbass.<ref name=BlackJohns/>

In 2015 the [[Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]] published a report criticizing Russian disinformation campaigns to disrupt relations between Europe and Ukraine after the ouster of [[Viktor Yanukovych]]. According to ''[[Deutsche Welle]]'', similar tactics were used by fake news websites during the U.S. elections. A website, [[StopFake]], was created by Ukrainian activists in 2014 to debunk fake news in Ukraine, including [[media portrayal of the Ukrainian crisis]].<ref>[http://www.dw.com/en/fake-news-medias-post-truth-problem/a-36428321 "Fake news: Media's post-truth problem"], [[Deutsche Welle]], retrieved November 24, 2016.</ref>

On May 29, 2018, the Ukrainian media and state officials announced that the Russian journalist [[Arkady Babchenko]] was assassinated in his apartment in Kyiv. Later, Babchenko appeared to be alive, and the [[Security Service of Ukraine]] claimed that the staged assassination was needed to arrest a person who allegedly was planning a real assassination. [[Alexander Baunov]], writing for Carnegie.ru, mentioned that the staged assassination of Babchenko was the first instance of fake news delivered directly by the highest officials of a state.<ref>((cite news|url=https://carnegie.ru/commentary/76478|script-title=ru:Репортеры без берегов. Что принесет Украине спецоперация с Бабченко|first=Alexander|last=Baunov|author-link=Alexander Baunov|date=May 31, 2018|publisher=carnegie.ru|language=ru|access-date=May 31, 2018))</ref>

==== United Kingdom ====
Under King [[Edward I of England]] (((reign | 1272 | 1307))) "a statute was passed which made it a grave offence to devise or tell any false news of prelates, dukes, earls, barons, or nobles of the realm."<ref>
((cite book
| last1 = Williams
| first1 = Charles Mallory
| last2 = Williams
| first2 = Cora May
| title = A Review of the Systems of Ethics: Founded on the Theory of Evolution
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=awsSAAAAYAAJ
| publisher = Macmillan
| date = 1892
| page = 492
| isbn = 9780837067186
| access-date = January 28, 2020
))
</ref>

In 1702 [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne of England]] issued a proclamation "for restraining the spreading false news, and printing and publishing of irreligious and seditious papers and libels".<ref>((cite book|author=Queen Anne|title=By the Queen, a proclamation, for restraining the spreading false news, and printing and publishing of irreligious and seditious papers and libels|date=1702|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E2JZAQAACAAJ))</ref>

On December 8, 2016, [[Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service]] (MI6) [[Alex Younger]] delivered a speech to journalists at the [[SIS Building|MI6 headquarters]] where he called fake news and propaganda damaging to democracy. Younger said the mission of MI6 was to combat propaganda and fake news in order to deliver to his government a strategic advantage in the [[information warfare|information-warfare]] arena, and to assist other nations including Europe. He called such methods of fake-news propaganda online a "fundamental threat to our sovereignty". Younger said all nations that hold democratic values should feel the same worry over fake news.<ref>Waterson, Jim (December 8, 2016), [https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/mi6-chief-says-fake-news-and-online-propaganda-is-a-threat-t "MI6 Chief says fake news and online propaganda are a threat to democracy"], [[BuzzFeed]], retrieved December 11, 2016.</ref>

However, definitions of ''fake news'' have been controversial in the UK.<ref>O'Grady, Sean (February 9, 2017). [https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/corbyn-keunssberg-trump-fake-news-danger-to-democracy-a7572176.html "The term 'fake news' isn't just annoying, it's a danger to democracy"]. ''[[The Independent]]''. Retrieved March 5, 2017.</ref> Dr Claire Wardle advised some UK Members of Parliament against using the term in certain circumstances "when describing the complexity of information disorder", as the term ''fake news'' is "woefully inadequate":

<blockquote>Neither the words 'fake' nor 'news' effectively capture this polluted information ecosystem. Much of the content used as examples in debates on this topic are not fake, they are genuine but used out of context or manipulated. Similarly, to understand the entire ecosystem of polluted information, we need to consider far more than content that mimics 'news'.<ref>((cite news |last1= Hern |first1= Alex |title= MPs warned against term 'fake news' for first live committee hearing outside UK |url= https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/07/commons-committee-must-not-use-term-fake-news-in-us-hearing |access-date= 1 August 2018 |newspaper= [[The Guardian]] |date= 7 February 2018 ))</ref></blockquote>

In October 2020, a hoax claim made by a spoof [[Twitter]] account, about the supposed reopening of [[Woolworths Group (United Kingdom)|Woolworths]] stores, was repeated without verification by news sites including the [[Daily Mail|''Daily Mail'']] and [[Daily Mirror|''Daily Mirror'']] (and the latter's regional sister titles).<ref>((cite news |last1=Waterson |first1=Jim |title=Sixth-form student revealed to be behind 'Woolworths reopening' fake news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/28/sixth-form-student-revealed-behind-woolworths-reopening-fake-news |access-date=October 28, 2020 |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=October 28, 2020))</ref>

=== Asia ===
==== China ====
((See also|Internet censorship in China|50 Cent Party))

Fake news during the 2016 U.S. election spread to China. Articles popularized within the United States were translated into Chinese and spread within China.<ref name=Guardian12.2.16/> The [[government of China]] used the growing problem of fake news as a rationale for increasing [[Internet censorship in China]] in November 2016.<ref>Orlowski, Andrew (November 21, 2016), [https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/11/21/china_cites_trump_to_justify_fake_news_clampdown_surprised/ "China cites Trump to justify 'fake news' media clampdown. Surprised?"], ''[[The Register]]'', retrieved November 28, 2016.</ref> China then published an editorial in its [[Communist Party]] newspaper ''[[The Global Times]]'' called "Western media's crusade against Facebook", and criticized "unpredictable" political problems posed by freedoms enjoyed by users of [[Twitter]], [[Google]], and [[Facebook]]. China government leaders meeting in [[Wuzhen]] at the third [[World Internet Conference]] in November 2016 said fake news in the U.S. election justified adding more curbs to free and open use of the Internet. China Deputy Minister Ren Xianliang, official at the [[Cyberspace Administration of China]], said increasing online participation led to "harmful information" and fraud.<ref>Pascaline, Mary (November 20, 2016), [http://www.ibtimes.com/facebook-fake-news-stories-china-calls-more-censorship-internet-following-social-2448774 "Facebook fake news stories: China calls for more censorship on internet following social media's alleged role in US election"], ''[[International Business Times]]'', retrieved November 28, 2016.</ref> Kam Chow Wong, a former [[Hong Kong]] law enforcement official and criminal justice professor at [[Xavier University]], praised attempts in the U.S. to patrol social media.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/17/after-trump-americans-want-facebook-and-google-to-vet-news-china-likes-that-plan/ "After Trump, Americans want Facebook and Google to vet news. So does China."], ''[[The Washington Post]]'', retrieved November 28, 2016.</ref> ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' noted China's themes of [[Internet censorship]] became more relevant at the World Internet Conference due to the outgrowth of fake news.<ref>Dou, Eva (November 18, 2016), [https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-presses-tech-firms-to-police-the-internet-1479467851 "China presses tech firms to police the Internet—Third-Annual World Internet Conference aimed at proselytizing China's view to global audience"], ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', retrieved November 28, 2016.</ref>

The issue of fake news in the 2016 United States election gave the Chinese Government a reason to further criticize Western democracy and press freedom. The Chinese government accused Western media organisations of bias, in a move apparently inspired by President Trump.<ref name="NYT Hernandez 2017-05-07">((Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/world/asia/china-fake-news-xie.html |title=China's Response to Reports of Torture: 'Fake News' |last=Hernández |first=Javier C. |date=March 3, 2017 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=July 13, 2017|quote=Trump's attacks on the media will offer a good excuse for Chinese officials to step up their criticism of Western democracy and press freedom((nbsp))... The Chinese government has long denounced Western news organizations as biased and dishonest—and in Mr. Trump, Beijing has found an American president who often does the same.))</ref>

In March 2017, the ''[[People's Daily]]'', a newspaper run by the ruling [[Chinese Communist Party]], denounced news coverage of the torture of Chinese lawyer and human rights advocate Xie Yang, claiming it to be fake news.<ref name="NYT Hernandez 2017-05-07" /> The newspaper published a [[Twitter]] post declaring that "Foreign media reports that police tortured a detained lawyer is FAKE NEWS, fabricated to tarnish China's image". The state-owned [[Xinhua News Agency]] claimed that "the stories were essentially fake news". The Chinese government often accused Western news organizations of being biased and dishonest.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/world/asia/china-fake-news-xie.html|title=China's Response to Reports of Torture: 'Fake News'|last=Hernández|first=Javier C.|date=March 3, 2017|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=May 7, 2017))</ref>

The Chinese government also claimed that there were people who posed as journalists who spread negative information on social media in order to extort payment from their victims to stop doing so. David Bandurski of University of Hong Kong's China Media Project said that this issue continued to worsen.<ref>((cite news |date=March 28, 2014 |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/03/28/china-targets-fake-news/ |title=China's Big Problem With 'Fake News' |newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] China Real Time Report blog |access-date=April 28, 2017))</ref>

==== Hong Kong, China ====
((See also|Reactions to the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests#Internet activities))
During the [[2019–20 Hong Kong protests]], the Chinese government has been accused for using fake news to spread misinformation regarding the protests. It includes describing protests as "riots", and "radicals" seeking independence for the city. Due to the [[Censorship in China|online censorship in China]], citizens inside mainland China could not read news reports from some media outlets.<ref>((cite news |last1=Kuo |first1=Lily |title=Beijing's new weapon to muffle Hong Kong protests: fake news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/11/hong-kong-china-unrest-beijing-media-response |work=The Observer |access-date=September 1, 2019 |date=August 11, 2019))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Viral rumours and fake news risk further polarising city, scholars warn |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3019813/rumours-and-fake-news-shared-online-risk-further-polarising |work=South China Morning Post |access-date=September 1, 2019 |date=July 23, 2019 |language=en))</ref> It was also found by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube that misinformation was spread with fake accounts and advertisements by state-backed media. Large amount of accounts were suspended.<ref>((cite news |last1=Stewart |first1=Emily |title=How China used Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to spread disinformation about the Hong Kong protests |url=https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/20/20813660/china-facebook-twitter-hong-kong-protests-social-media |access-date=September 1, 2019 |work=Vox |date=August 20, 2019))</ref>

[[Dot Dot News]], a pro-Beijing online media located in Hong Kong, has been banned by Facebook for distributing fake news and hate speech.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.passiontimes.hk/article/09-14-2019/55924|title=建制網媒《點新聞》Fb專頁被封 即開新Page投訴遭滅聲|date=September 14, 2019|access-date=September 22, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915073752/http://www.passiontimes.hk/article/09-14-2019/55924|archive-date=September 15, 2019|agency=熱血時報|url-status=live))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=http://paper.wenweipo.com/2019/09/18/HK1909180026.htm|title=facebook四封點新聞 縱容山寨橫行|date=September 18, 2019|access-date=September 29, 2019|publisher=文匯報))</ref>((unreliable source?|date=October 2023))

==== India ====
((Main|Fake news in India))
Fake news in India has led to violent incidents between [[caste]]s and religions, interfering with public policies. It often spreads through the [[smartphone]] [[Instant messaging|instant messenger]] [[WhatsApp]],<ref name="wapo">((cite news|last1=Doshi|first1=Vidhi|title=India's millions of new Internet users are falling for fake news – sometimes with deadly consequences|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/indias-millions-of-new-internet-users-are-falling-for-fake-news--sometimes-with-deadly-consequences/2017/10/01/f078eaee-9f7f-11e7-8ed4-a750b67c552b_story.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=December 30, 2017|date=October 1, 2017))</ref> which had 200 million [[monthly active users]] in the country ((as of|2017|February|lc=y)).<ref>((cite web|last1=Singh|first1=Manish|title=WhatsApp hits 200 million active users in India|url=http://mashable.com/2017/02/24/whatsapp-india-200-million-active-users|website=Mashable|date=February 24, 2017|access-date=December 30, 2017))</ref>

==== Indonesia ====
Indonesia is reported to have the fourth-highest number of Facebook users in the world.<ref name="BBC2019">((cite news |title=Indonesia election 2019: All you need to know |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-47729119 |work=BBC News |date=8 April 2019))</ref> Indonesia has seen an increase in the amount of fake news and hoaxes on social media, particularly around elections in 2014 and 2019.<ref name="Hui">((cite journal |last1=Hui |first1=Jennifer Yang |title=SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE 2019 INDONESIAN ELECTIONS: Hoax Takes the Centre Stage |journal=Southeast Asian Affairs |date=2020 |pages=155–172 |doi=10.1355/aa20-1i |jstor=26938889 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26938889 |issn=0377-5437))</ref><ref name="Paterson">((cite news |last1=Paterson |first1=Thomas |title=Indonesia's 'hoaxes' go deeper than just disinformation |url=https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/07/05/indonesias-hoaxes-go-deeper-than-just-disinformation/ |work=East Asia Forum |date=5 July 2019 |language=en))</ref> This has been accompanied by increased polarization within the country.<ref name="Warburton">((cite news |last1=Warburton |first1=Eve |title=Deepening Polarization and Democratic Decline in Indonesia |url=https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/08/18/deepening-polarization-and-democratic-decline-in-indonesia-pub-82435 |work=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |date=August 18, 2020))</ref>

During the [[2014 Indonesian presidential election|2014 presidential election]], the eventual winning candidate [[Joko Widodo]] became a target of a smear campaign by [[Prabowo Subianto]]'s supporters that falsely claimed he was the child of [[Communist Party of Indonesia|Indonesian Communist Party]] members, of [[Chinese Indonesians|Chinese descent]], and a [[Christians|Christian]].<ref name="auto4">((cite news|last1=Kwok|first1=Yenni|title=Where Memes Could Kill: Indonesia's Worsening Problem of Fake News|url=http://time.com/4620419/indonesia-fake-news-ahok-chinese-christian-islam/|website=Time.com|access-date=June 2, 2017))</ref> After Widodo won, Subianto challenged the results, making claims of widespread fraud that were not upheld. Observers found that the election was carried out fairly.<ref name="BBC2014">((cite news |title=Prabowo challenges Indonesia presidential election result |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28670712 |work=BBC News |date=6 August 2014))</ref>

According to Mafindo, which tracks fake news in Indonesia, political disinformation increased by 61% between December 2018 and January 2019, leading up to the [[2019 Indonesian general election|2019 presidential election]]. Both political candidates and electoral institutions were targeted.<ref name="BBC2019"/><ref name="Lamb">((cite news |last1=Lamb |first1=Kate |title=Fake news spikes in Indonesia ahead of elections |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/20/fake-news-spikes-in-indonesia-ahead-of-elections |work=The Guardian |date=20 March 2019))</ref>
Both sides formed dedicated anti-hoax groups to counterattacks on social media.<ref name="antihoaxprabowo">((cite news |title=Prabowo to Set Up Anti-hoax Team During Election Campaign |url=https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2018/09/23/055921895/Prabowo-to-Set-Up-Anti-hoax-Team-During-Election-Campaign |access-date=16 October 2018 |work=Tempo |date=23 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923172432/http://en.tempo.co/read/news/2018/09/23/055921895/Prabowo-to-Set-Up-Anti-hoax-Team-During-Election-Campaign |archive-date=23 September 2018 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all ))</ref><ref>((cite news |last1=Putri |first1=Zunita |title=Tangkal Hoax, Timses Jokowi Bentuk Tim Siber Hadapi Isu di Medsos |url=https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4164269/tangkal-hoax-timses-jokowi-bentuk-tim-siber-hadapi-isu-di-medsos |access-date=20 October 2018 |work=detiknews |date=13 August 2018 |language=id |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190329115810/https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4164269/tangkal-hoax-timses-jokowi-bentuk-tim-siber-hadapi-isu-di-medsos |archive-date=29 March 2019 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all ))</ref>  The Indonesian government held weekly fake news briefings.<ref>((cite news |last1=Handley |first1=Lucy |title=Indonesia's government is to hold public fake news briefings every week |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/27/indonesias-government-is-to-hold-public-fake-news-briefings-each-week.html |access-date=20 October 2018 |work=CNBC |date=27 September 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928121934/https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/27/indonesias-government-is-to-hold-public-fake-news-briefings-each-week.html |archive-date=28 September 2018 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all ))</ref><ref name="Hui"/>
Once again, the losing candidate refused to accept the result and claimed that there had been fraud, without presenting any supporting evidence. Protests, rioting, and deaths of protestors were reported.<ref>((cite news |last1=Lamb |first1=Kate |title=Indonesia riots: six dead after protesters clash with troops over election result |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/22/indonesia-riots-protesters-clash-with-security-forces-over-election-result |work=The Guardian |date=22 May 2019))</ref>

Fake news in Indonesia frequently tends to be related to alleged [[Chinese imperialism]] (including [[Sinicization]]),  [[Christianization]],<ref name="Suryadinata">((cite news |last1=Suryadinata |first1=Leo |title=Anti-China campaign in Jokowi's Indonesia |url=https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/anti-china-campaign-in-jokowis-indonesia |work=The Straits Times |date=10 January 2017 |language=en))</ref> and [[communization]].<ref name="Varagur">((cite news |last1=Varagur |first1=Krithika |title='Fake News' Remains a Problem in Indonesia |url=https://www.voanews.com/a/fake-news-indonesia/4038139.html |work=Voice of America |date=21 September 2017 |language=en))</ref>
Inflaming ethnic and political tensions is potentially deadly in Indonesia, with its recent incidences of domestic terrorism, and its long and bloody history of [[Anti-communism|anti-communist]], [[Persecution of Christians in the modern era|anti-Christian]] and [[Sinophobia|anti-Chinese]] pogroms cultivated by [[Suharto]]'s [[New Order (Indonesia)|U.S.-backed right-wing dictatorship]].<ref>((cite book |last1=Temby |first1=Quinton |chapter=Disinformation, Violence, and Anti-Chinese Sentiment in Indonesia’s 2019 Elections |title=The Jokowi-Prabowo Elections 2.0 |date=31 December 2022 |pages=90–106 |doi=10.1355/9789815011371-008 ))</ref><ref name="auto4"/><ref name="Beech">((cite news |last1=Beech |first1=Hannah |last2=Suhartono |first2=Muktita |title=Joko Wins Re-Election in Indonesia, Defeating Hard-Line Former General |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/20/world/asia/joko-widodo-indonesia-election.html |work=The New York Times |date=May 20, 2019))</ref>

The Indonesian government, watchdog groups, and even religious organizations have taken steps to prevent the spreading of disinformation, through steps such as blocking certain websites and creating fact-check apps. The largest Islamic mass organization in Indonesia, [[Nahdlatul Ulama]], has created an anti-fake news campaign called #TurnBackHoax, while other Islamic groups have defined such propagation as tantamount to sin.<ref name="auto4"/> While the government currently views criminal punishment as the last resort, officials are working hard to guarantee law enforcement will respect the freedom of expression.

==== Malaysia ====
In April 2018, Malaysia implemented the Anti-Fake News Bill 2018, a controversial law that deemed publishing and circulating misleading information a crime punishable by up to six years in prison and/or fines of up to 500,000 ringgit.<ref name = "malaysia"/> At implementation, the country's prime minister was [[Najib Razak]], whose associates were connected to the mishandling of at least $3.5 billion by a [[United States Department of Justice]] report.<ref name="auto10">((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/world/asia/malaysia-1mdb-najib-razak.html|title=Justice Department rejects account of how Malaysia's leader acquired millions|newspaper=The New York Times |date=July 22, 2016 |access-date=May 30, 2018|language=en|last1=Paddock |first1=Richard C. ))</ref><ref name = "malaysia"/> Of that sum of money, $731 million was deposited into bank accounts controlled by Razak.<ref name = "malaysia"/><ref name="auto10"/> The convergence between the fake news law and Razak's connection to scandal was made clear by the Malaysian minister of communications and multimedia, [[Salleh Said Keruak]], who said that tying Razak to a specific dollar amount could be a prosecutable offense.<ref name = "malaysia">((cite news |last1=Beech |first1=Hannah |title=As Malaysia moves to ban 'fake news,' worries about who decides the truth |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/world/asia/malaysia-fake-news-law.html |work=The New York Times |date=April 2, 2018 ))</ref> In the [[2018 Malaysian general election]], Najib Razak lost his seat as prime minister to [[Mahathir Mohamad|Mahatir Mohammad]], who vowed to abolish the fake news law in his campaign, as the law was used to target him.<ref name="auto11">((Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44104879|title=Malaysia to review not revoke fake news law|date=May 14, 2018|work=BBC News|access-date=May 30, 2018|language=en-GB))</ref><ref name="auto12">((Cite news|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/malaysias-fake-news-law-is-here-to-stay-new-prime-minister-says/|title=Malaysia's fake-news law is here to stay, new PM says|date=May 13, 2018|work=CNET|access-date=May 30, 2018|language=en))</ref> After winning the election, the newly elected prime minister Mohammad has said, "Even though we support freedom of press and freedom of speech, there are limits."<ref name="auto11"/><ref name="auto12"/> ((as of|2018|May)), Mohammad has supported amending the law, rather than a full abolition.<ref name="auto12"/>

Paul Bernal, a lecturer in information and technology, fears that the fake news epidemic is a "Trojan horse" for countries like Malaysia to "control uncomfortable stories".<ref>((cite magazine|url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/malaysia-fake-news-law-uk-india-free-speech|title=Fake news laws are threatening free speech on a global scale|last=Priday|first=Richard|date=April 5, 2018|magazine=Wired|access-date=May 30, 2018))</ref> The vagueness of this law means that satirists, opinion writers, and journalists who make errors could face persecution. The law also makes it illegal to share fake news stories. In one instance, a Danish man and Malaysian citizen were arrested for posting false news stories online and were sentenced to serve a month in jail.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/04/30/607068241/danish-man-is-first-person-convicted-under-malaysias-anti-fake-news-law|title=Danish Man is First Person Sentenced Under Malaysia's Anti-Fake-News Law|last=Domonoske|first=Kamila|date=April 30, 2018|website=NPR|access-date=May 30, 2018))</ref>

==== Myanmar (Burma) ====
In 2015, [[BBC News]] reported on fake stories, using unrelated photographs and fraudulent captions, shared online in support of the [[Rohingya]].<ref>[https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-32979147 "The fake pictures of the Rohingya crisis"], [[BBC News]], June 6, 2015, retrieved December 8, 2016.</ref> Fake news negatively affected individuals in [[Myanmar]], leading to a rise in [[Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar|violence against Muslims in the country]]. Online participation surged from one percent to 20 percent of Myanmar's total populace from 2014 to 2016. Fake stories from Facebook were reprinted in paper periodicals called ''Facebook'' and ''The Internet''. False reporting related to practitioners of Islam in the country was directly correlated with increased attacks on [[Islam in Myanmar|Muslims in Myanmar]]. [[BuzzFeed]] journalist Sheera Frenkel reported fake news fictitiously stated believers in Islam acted out in violence at Buddhist locations. She documented a direct relationship between the fake news and violence against Muslim people. Frenkel noted countries that were relatively newer to Internet exposure were more vulnerable to the problems of fake news and fraud.

==== Pakistan ====
[[Khawaja Muhammad Asif]], the [[Pakistan Minister of Defence|Minister of Defence]] of [[Pakistan]], threatened on [[Twitter]] to attack [[Israel]] with nuclear weapons after a false story claiming that [[Avigdor Lieberman]], the Israeli [[Ministry of Defense (Israel)|Ministry of Defense]], said "If Pakistan send ground troops into Syria on any pretext, we will destroy this country with a nuclear attack."<ref>Goldman, Russell (December 24, 2016). [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/24/world/asia/pakistan-israel-khawaja-asif-fake-news-nuclear.html "Reading Fake News, Pakistani Minister Directs Nuclear Threat at Israel"]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved December 29, 2016.</ref><ref>Politi, Daniel (December 26, 2016). [http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/26/fake_news_story_leads_pakistani_minister_to_issue_nuclear_threat_against.html "A Fake News Story Leads Pakistani Minister to Issue Nuclear Threat Against Israel"]. [[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]. Retrieved December 29, 2016.</ref>

==== Philippines ====
((main|Fake news in the Philippines))
Fake news sites have become rampant for Philippine audiences, especially being shared on social media.<ref name="cnnPhilippinesCBCPFightFakeNews">((cite news|last1=Bacungan|first1=VJ|title=CBCP to public: Fight 'fake news'|url=http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/06/22/cbcp-fight-fake-news.html|publisher=CNN Philippines|date=June 23, 2017|access-date=June 13, 2020|archive-date=June 26, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626010459/http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/06/22/cbcp-fight-fake-news.html|url-status=dead))</ref> Politicians have started filing laws to combat fake news<ref name="inquirerPangilinanSocMedFakeNews">((cite news|last1=Ager|first1=Maila|title=Pangilinan seeks penalty vs social media for spread of fake news|url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/863507/pangilinan-seeks-possible-penalty-vs-social-media-for-spread-of-fake-news|publisher=Philippine Daily Inquirer|date=January 19, 2017))</ref><ref name="cnnPhilippinesBillFiledFakeNews">((cite news|last1=Santos|first1=Eimor|title=Bill filed vs. fake news: Up to ₱10M fine, 10-year jail time for erring public officials|url=http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/06/22/senate-bill-fake-news-fines-government-officials.html|publisher=CNN Philippines|date=June 22, 2017|access-date=June 28, 2017|archive-date=June 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170625235633/http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/06/22/senate-bill-fake-news-fines-government-officials.html|url-status=dead))</ref> and three Senate hearings have been held on the topic.<ref name="senateTacklesFakeNewsPh">((cite news |title=Senate tackles spread of 'fake news' |url=http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/10/04/Senate-spread-of-fake-news.html |publisher=[[CNN Philippines]] |date=October 4, 2017 |access-date=June 13, 2020 |archive-date=October 29, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181029112221/http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/10/04/Senate-spread-of-fake-news.html |url-status=dead ))</ref><ref name="senateHolds2ndHearingPh">((cite news |last1=Bacungan |first1=VJ |title=Senate holds 2nd hearing on fake news |url=http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/01/30/senate-fake-news-hearing-january-30.html |publisher=[[CNN Philippines]] |date=January 30, 2018 |access-date=June 13, 2020 |archive-date=October 29, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181029112238/http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/01/30/senate-fake-news-hearing-january-30.html |url-status=dead ))</ref><ref name="liveSenateHearing3Ph">((cite news |title=LIVE: Senate hearing on fake news online |url=https://www.rappler.com/nation/184192-senate-hearing-fake-news-online |publisher=[[Rappler]] |date=March 15, 2018))</ref>

The [[Catholic Church in the Philippines]] has also released a missive speaking out against it.<ref name="stopFakeNewsFilipinoBishops">((cite news|title=Stop sharing fake news, Filipino bishops implore|url=https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/06/24/stop-sharing-fake-news-filipino-bishops-implore/|agency=Catholic News Agency|publisher=Crux|date=June 24, 2017|access-date=June 30, 2020|archive-date=April 14, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180414010322/https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2017/06/24/stop-sharing-fake-news-filipino-bishops-implore/|url-status=dead))</ref>

[[Vera Files]] research at the end of 2017 and 2018 show that the most shared fake news in the Philippines appeared to benefit two people the most: President [[Rodrigo Duterte]] (as well as his allies) and politician [[Bongbong Marcos]], with the most viral news driven by shares on networks of Facebook pages.<ref name="veraYearEnderBenefitedMostFakeNews">((cite news |title=Vera Files Yearender: Who benefited most from fake news, and other questions, answered in three charts |url=http://verafiles.org/articles/vera-files-yearender-who-benefited-most-fake-news-and-other |publisher=[[Vera Files]] |date=December 22, 2017))</ref> Most Philippine-audience Facebook pages and groups spreading online disinformation also bear ''Duterte'', ''Marcos'' or ''News'' in their names and are pro-Duterte.<ref name="veraAdsRevealLinks">((cite news |title=Vera Files Fact Checker Yearender: Ads reveal links between websites producing fake news |url=http://www.verafiles.org/articles/vera-files-fact-check-yearender-ads-reveal-links-between-web |publisher=[[Vera Files]] |date=December 30, 2018 |access-date=June 30, 2020 |archive-date=May 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522004259/https://www.verafiles.org/articles/vera-files-fact-check-yearender-ads-reveal-links-between-web |url-status=dead ))</ref> Online disinformation in the Philippines is overwhelmingly political as well, with most attacking groups or individuals critical of the Duterte administration.<ref name="veraDuterteAlliesMostBenefitsDisinformation">((cite news |last1=Soriano |first1=Jake |title=Duterte, allies reap the most benefits from disinformation |url=http://verafiles.org/articles/duterte-allies-reap-most-benefits-disinformation |publisher=[[Vera Files]] |date=December 19, 2018))</ref> Many Philippine-audience fake news websites also appear to be controlled by the same operators as they share common [[Google AdSense]] and [[Google Analytics]] IDs.<ref name="veraAdsRevealLinks" />

According to media scholar Jonathan Corpus Ong, Duterte's presidential campaign is regarded as the [[Index case|patient zero]] in the [[#21st century|current era of disinformation]], having preceded widespread global coverage of the [[Cambridge Analytica]] scandal and [[Internet Research Agency|Russian trolls]].<ref name="trollsForSale">((cite news |last1=Ong |first1=Jonathan Corpus |title=Trolls for Sale in the World's Social Media Capital |url=https://www.asiaglobalonline.hku.hk/philippines-internet-trolls-social-media-duterte/ |publisher=AsiaGlobal Online |date=August 30, 2018))</ref> Fake news is so established and severe in the Philippines that Facebook's Global Politics and Government Outreach Director [[Katie Harbath]] also calls it "patient zero"<ref name="facebookKatieHarbath">((cite news |title=360/OS: Facebook's Katie Harbath on protecting election integrity |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJ1wcpsOtS4 |publisher=[[Rappler]] |date=June 23, 2018))</ref> in the global misinformation epidemic, having happened before [[Brexit]], the [[Donald Trump|Trump]] nomination and the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 US Elections]].<ref name="nytSoldiersFacebookWarFakeNews">((cite news |last1=Stevenson |first1=Alexandra |title=Soldiers in Facebook's War on Fake News Are Feeling Overrun |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/09/business/facebook-philippines-rappler-fake-news.html |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=October 9, 2018))</ref>

==== Singapore ====
((See also|Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act))
[[Singapore]] criminalizes the propagation of fake news. Under existing law, "Any person who transmits or causes to be transmitted a message which he knows to be false or fabricated shall be guilty of an offense".<ref>s.45, Telecommunications Act (Cap. 323), retrieved from [http://statutes.agc.gov.sg] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171215173603/http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/|date=December 15, 2017)) on June 20, 2017</ref>

On March 18, 2015, a doctored screenshot of the Prime Minister's Office website claiming the demise of [[Lee Kuan Yew]] went viral, and several international news agencies such as [[CNN]] and [[China Central Television]] initially reported it as news, until corrected by the Prime Minister's Office. The image was created by a student to demonstrate to his classmates how fake news could be easily created and propagated.<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/student-who-posted-fake-pmo-announcement-on-mr-lee-kuan-yews-death-given-stern-warning|title=Student who posted fake PMO announcement on Mr Lee Kuan Yew's death given stern warning|last=migration|date=April 7, 2015|work=The Straits Times|access-date=June 29, 2017|language=en))</ref> In 2017, Singaporean news website ''Mothership'' was criticized by the [[Ministry of Education (Singapore)|Ministry of Education]] (MOE) for propagating remarks falsely attributed to a MOE official.<ref>((Cite web|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ministry-education-raps-mothership-sg-fake-news-officials-comments-091535082.html|title=Ministry of Education raps Mothership for 'fake news' on official's comments|website=sg.news.yahoo.com|date=August 29, 2017 |accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref> In addition, Minister of Law [[K. Shanmugam]] also singled out online news website ''The States Times Review'' as an example of a source of fake news, as it once claimed a near-zero turnout at the state funeral of President [[S. R. Nathan]].<ref>((cite web|url=https://coconuts.co/singapore/news/shanmugam-pinpoints-states-times-review-singapore-stuff-purveyors-fake-news/amp/|title=Shanmugam pinpoints States Times Review as fake news; States Times Review responds scathingly |date=April 4, 2017|publisher=Coconuts))</ref>

Following these incidents, Shanmugam stated that the existing legalization is limited and ineffective<ref>Au-Yong, Rachel (April 4, 2017). [http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/fake-news-current-laws-offer-limited-remedies "Fake news: Current laws 'offer limited remedies(('"))]. ''[[The Straits Times]]''. Retrieved April 28, 2017.</ref> and indicated that the government intends to introduce legislation to combat fake news in 2018.<ref>((Cite news|url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-laws-on-fake-news-to-be-introduced-next-year-shanmugam-8958048|title=New laws on fake news to be introduced next year: Shanmugam|work=Channel NewsAsia|access-date=June 29, 2017|language=en-US|archive-date=June 22, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170622024851/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-laws-on-fake-news-to-be-introduced-next-year-shanmugam-8958048|url-status=dead))</ref> In 2017, the Ministry of Communications and Information set up ''Factually'', a website intended to debunk false rumors regarding issues of public interest such as the environment, housing and transport,<ref>((cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/factually-website-clarifies-widespread-falsehoods|title=Factually website clarifies 'widespread' falsehoods|newspaper=The Straits Times|date=March 2, 2017))</ref> while in 2018, the [[Parliament of Singapore]] formed a [[Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods]] to consider new legislation to tackle fake news.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/select-committee-formed-to-study-deliberate-online-falsehoods-9851096|title=Select Committee formed to study deliberate online falsehoods|access-date=February 28, 2018|archive-date=October 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024234327/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/select-committee-formed-to-study-deliberate-online-falsehoods-9851096|url-status=dead))</ref> On recommendations from the select committee, the Singapore government introduced the [[Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act|Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill]] (POFMA) in April 2019.<ref>((cite web|url=https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Bills-Supp/10-2019/Published/20190401?DocDate=20190401|title=Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill – Singapore Statutes Online|website=sso.agc.gov.sg|language=en|access-date=April 30, 2019))</ref>

Critics had pointed out that this bill could introduce government self-censorship and increase government control over social media.<ref>((cite news |last1=Fullerton |first1=Jamie |title=Singapore to introduce anti-fake news law, allowing removal of articles |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/01/singapore-to-introduce-anti-fake-news-law-allowing-removal-of-articles |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |date=April 1, 2019 ))</ref> Activist platform ''[[The Online Citizen]]'' regarded legislation against fake news as an attempt by the government to curb the free flow of information so that only information approved by the government is disseminated to the public.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2017/09/11/fake-news-who-decides-what-is-real-and-what-is-fake/|title=Fake news: Who decides what is real and what is fake?|date=September 11, 2017|access-date=October 29, 2017|archive-date=March 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308150559/https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2017/09/11/fake-news-who-decides-what-is-real-and-what-is-fake/|url-status=dead))</ref> In an online essay, activist and historian [[Thum Ping Tjin]] denied that fake news was a problem in Singapore, and accused the [[People's Action Party]] government as the only major source of fake news, claiming that detentions made without trial during [[Operation Coldstore]] and [[Operation Spectrum]] were based on fake news for party political gain.<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2018/02/27/sg-academic-at-oxford-major-fake-news-spreader-is-govt-need-to-educate-sgs-to-be-more-critical-in-thinking/|title=SG academic at Oxford: Major "fake news" spreader is Govt – need to educate SGs to be more critical in thinking|date=February 27, 2018|access-date=February 28, 2018|archive-date=June 18, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200618214148/https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2018/02/27/sg-academic-at-oxford-major-fake-news-spreader-is-govt-need-to-educate-sgs-to-be-more-critical-in-thinking/|url-status=dead))</ref> Facebook and Google had opposed the introduction of the law to combat fake news, claiming that existing legislation was adequate to address the problem and that an effective way of combating misinformation is through educating citizens on how to distinguish reliable from unreliable information.<ref>((cite web|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/facebook-google-warn-singapore-against-fake-news-law-091707611--finance.html|title=Facebook, Google warn Singapore against 'fake news' law|date=March 22, 2018 |access-date=April 24, 2018))</ref>

The bill was passed June 3, 2019. Commencing on October 2, 2019, the law is designed specifically to allow authorities to respond to fake news or false information through a graduated process of enforcing links to fact-checking statements, censorship of website or assets on social media platforms, and criminal charges.<ref>((Cite web|title=POFMA encourages democracy, does not disadvantage opposition: Shanmugam on upcoming General Election|url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pofma-democracy-disadvantage-opposition-election-ge-shanmugam-12857488|website=CNA|access-date=May 11, 2021|archive-date=May 11, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210511205941/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/pofma-democracy-disadvantage-opposition-election-ge-shanmugam-12857488|url-status=dead))</ref> There have been 75 recorded instances of POFMA's usage since the law's introduction, with the latest((As of?|date=March 2024)) occurring on May 7, 2021.<ref>((Cite web|date=May 7, 2021|title=POFMA'ed V2021.05.07|url=http://pofmaed.com/pofmaed-v2021-05-07/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507121559/https://pofmaed.com/pofmaed-v2021-05-07/|url-status=usurped|archive-date=May 7, 2021|access-date=May 11, 2021|website=POFMA'ed|language=en))</ref>

==== South Korea ====
South Korean journalists and media experts lament political hostility between South and North Korea which distorts [[media coverage of North Korea]]<ref>((cite web|url=http://www.nknews.org/2015/08/s-korean-journalists-lament-low-quality-n-korea-reporting/|title=S.Korean journalists lament low-quality N. Korea reporting – NK News – North Korea News|date=August 10, 2015))</ref> and North Korea has attributed erroneous reporting to South Korea and United States with being critical to media organization [[The Chosun Ilbo|Chosun Ilbo]]<ref name="lareviewofbooks.org">((cite web|url=http://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/provocations/firewood-fuel-fake-news-north-korea-source-urban-legends/|title=On Firewood, Fuel, Fake News – North Korea, a Source of Urban Legends|date=January 27, 2017 ))</ref> while American journalist [[Barbara Demick]] had also made similar criticisms on media coverage of North.<ref name="lareviewofbooks.org"/>

On November 27, 2018, prosecutors raided the house of [[Gyeonggi Province]] governor [[Lee Jae-myung]] amid suspicions that his wife used a pseudonymous Twitter handle to spread fake news about [[President of South Korea|President]] [[Moon Jae-in]] and other political rivals of her husband.<ref>((cite web|url=http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181127000532|title=Prosecutors raid Gyeonggi governor's home, office to search for criminal evidence|date=November 27, 2018|access-date=November 29, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/11/27/2018112701290.html|title=Gyeonggi Governor's House Raided in Fake News Scandal|access-date=November 29, 2018))</ref>

==== Taiwan ====

[[Taiwan]]'s leaders, including President [[Tsai Ing-wen]] and Premier [[William Lai]], accused [[50 Cent Party|China's troll army]] of spreading "fake news" via social media to support candidates more sympathetic to Beijing ahead of the [[2018 Taiwanese local elections]].<ref>((cite news |title='Fake news' rattles Taiwan ahead of elections |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/11/news-rattles-taiwan-elections-181123005140173.html |work=Al-Jazeera |date=November 23, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Analysis: 'Fake news' fears grip Taiwan ahead of local polls |url=https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c200fqlq |publisher=BBC Monitoring| date=November 21, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Fake news: How China is interfering in Taiwanese democracy and what to do about it |url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3580979 |work=Taiwan News |date=November 23, 2018))</ref>

In a report in December 2015 by ''[[The China Post]]'', a fake video shared online showed people a light show purportedly made at the [[Shihmen Reservoir]]. The Northern Region Water Resources Office confirmed there was no light show at the reservoir and the event had been fabricated. The fraud led to an increase in tourist visits to the actual attraction.

According to the news updated paper from the Time World in regards the global threat to free speech, the Taiwanese government has reformed its policy on education and it will include "media literacy" as one part of school curriculum for the students. It will be included to develop the [[critical thinking|critical-thinking]] skills needed while using social media. Further, the work of media literacy will also include the skills needed to analyze propaganda and sources, so students can clarify what is fake news.<ref>Smith, N. (2017). [http://time.com/4730440/taiwan-fake-news-education/ ":Taiwan Is Leading the Way in Tackling Fake News"]. ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]''. Retrieved April 28, 2017.</ref>

=== Americas ===

==== Brazil ====
Brazil faced increasing influence from fake news after the [[2014 Brazilian general election|2014 re-election]] of President [[Dilma Rousseff]] and [[Impeachment of Dilma Rousseff|Rousseff's subsequent impeachment]] in August 2016. BBC Brazil reported in April 2016 that in the week surrounding one of the impeachment votes, three out of the five most-shared articles on Facebook in Brazil were fake. In 2015, reporter Tai Nalon resigned from her position at Brazilian newspaper ''[[Folha de S Paulo]]'' in order to start the first fact-checking website in Brazil, called ((Lang|pt|Aos Fatos)) ((Gloss|To The Facts)). Nalon told ''[[The Guardian]]'' there was a great deal of fake news, and hesitated to compare the problem to that experienced in the U.S.<ref name=Guardian12.2.16>Kate Connolly; Angelique Chrisafis; Poppy McPherson; Stephanie Kirchgaessner; Benjamin Haas; Dominic Phillips; Elle Hunt (December 2, 2016). [https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/dec/02/fake-news-facebook-us-election-around-the-world "Fake news: an insidious trend that's fast becoming a global problem – With fake online 1news dominating discussions after the US election, Guardian correspondents explain how it is distorting politics around the world"]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved December 2, 2016.</ref> Brazil also has a problem with fake news, and according to a survey, a greater number of people that believe fake news influenced the outcome of their elections (69%) than in the United States (47%).<ref name="auto8"/>

[[File:Jair Bolsonaro em maio de 2019.jpg|thumb|Jair Bolsonaro]]
President of Brazil [[Jair Bolsonaro]] has claimed that he will not allow his government to use any of its 1.8 billion ''[[Brazilian real|reais]]'' (US$487 million) media budget on purchases from fake news media (that is, media that does not support him).<ref>((cite news |last1=Anthony Boadle |last2=Gram Slattery |title=Brazil's next president declares war on 'fake news' media |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-politics-media/brazils-next-president-declares-war-on-fake-news-media-idUSKCN1N90NN |access-date=November 5, 2018 |work=Reuters |date=November 4, 2018 |quote="That newspaper is done", Bolsonaro said in a tense TV Globo interview. "As far as I'm concerned with government advertising—press that acts like that, lying shamelessly, won't have any support from the federal government."))</ref> The ''[[BBC]]'' reported that Bolsonaro's campaign declared media associating his campaign to the "extreme right" were themselves fake news.<ref>((cite news |last1=Ricardo Senra |title=In tour in the U.S., Bolsonaro to say that to associate him to the extreme right is "fake news" |url=https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-41179877 |access-date=November 5, 2018 |work=[[BBC]] |date=September 6, 2018 |language=pt |quote=Muitos jornalistas internacionais repetem bordões falsos, como este da extrema-direita, e o Jair vai mostrar que isso não é verdade. Não gosto muito do termo, mas vamos mostrar que isso é fake news (ou notícia falsa, em tradução literal).))</ref> In 2020, [[Supreme Federal Court|Brazil's Supreme Court]] began an investigation into a purported disinformation campaign by Bolsonaro supporters.<ref>((Cite news|last=McCoy|first=Terrence|title=An investigation into fake news targets Brazil's Bolsonaros, and critics fear a constitutional crisis|language=en-US|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/brazil-bolsonaro-fake-news-coronavirus/2020/06/03/60194428-a4de-11ea-898e-b21b9a83f792_story.html|access-date=April 23, 2021|issn=0190-8286))</ref> The Brazilian President claimed the investigation was "unconstitutional", and any restriction of fake news was an act of censorship.<ref>((Cite news|date=May 29, 2020|title=Brazil's Bolsonaro urges Supreme Court to shelve fake news probe|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/brazil-politics-idINKBN23430T|access-date=April 23, 2021))</ref> After an order by the Brazilian Supreme Court, Facebook had removed "dozens" of fake accounts that were directly linked to Bolsonaro's offices and his sons, and which were directed against politicians and media that opposed the President.<ref>((Cite web|author=Chandler Thornton and Rodrigo Pedroso|title=Facebook shuts down fake accounts tied to Bolsonaro staffers|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/09/americas/brazil-bolsonaro-facebook-fake-accounts-intl/index.html|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=CNN|date=July 9, 2020 ))</ref><ref>((Cite news|date=August 1, 2020|title=Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president's supporters|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53625728|access-date=May 12, 2021))</ref> A video of Bolsonaro falsely claiming that the anti-malarial drug [[hydroxychloroquine]] has been working everywhere against the coronavirus was also taken down by Facebook and Twitter.<ref>((Cite web|title=Facebook, Twitter prohibit video of Brazilian president endorsing unproven antiviral drug|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/facebook-removes-video-brazilian-president-endorsing-unproven-antiviral-drug-n1172566|access-date=May 12, 2021|website=NBC News|date=March 31, 2020 |language=en))</ref> In regards to the COVID-19 pandemic, he has accused his political opponents of exaggerating the severity of the virus. He gave a speech in 2021 in which he claimed that the virus was not as bad as the media made it out to be, and it was "fantasy" created by the media.<ref>((Cite web|title=Bolsonaro diz que 'pequena crise' do coronavírus é 'mais fantasia' e não 'isso tudo' que mídia propaga|url=https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2020/03/10/bolsonaro-diz-que-questao-do-coronavirus-e-muito-mais-fantasia.ghtml|access-date=May 11, 2021|website=G1|date=March 10, 2020 |language=pt-br))</ref>

In the wake of the uptick in Amazon fires of 2019, it became clear that many of the forest fire photos that went viral were fake news.<ref>((cite web|url=https://fox4kc.com/2019/08/22/fake-amazon-rainforest-fire-photos-are-misinforming-on-social-media/ |title=Fake Amazon rainforest fire photos are misinforming on social media &#124; FOX 4 Kansas City WDAF-TV &#124; News, Weather, Sports |publisher=Fox4kc.com |date=August 22, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref><ref name="afp.com">((cite web | url=https://www.afp.com/en/news/3954/amazon-fires-how-celebrities-are-spreading-misinformation-doc-1jp30t2 | title=Amazon fires: How celebrities are spreading misinformation| date=January 16, 2012))</ref> Emmanuel Macron, president of France, tweeted a picture taken by a photographer who died in 2003, for example.<ref name=NYTMacronDeadPhotographer>((cite news | url = https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/23/world/americas/amazon-rainforest-fire-photos.html | title = As Amazon Fires Spread, So Do the Misleading Photos | first = Niraj | last = Chokshi | date = August 23, 2019 | access-date = August 24, 2019 | work =[[The New York Times]] ))</ref><ref name="afp.com"/><ref>((cite web|author=Abigail Weinberg ((!)) Follow |url=https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2019/08/viral-photos-amazon-fire-fake-macron/ |title=Stop Sharing Those Viral Photos of the Amazon Burning – Mother Jones |publisher=Motherjones.com |date=August 21, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019))</ref>

==== Canada ====
Fake news online was brought to the attention of Canadian politicians in November 2016, as they debated helping assist local newspapers. Member of [[Parliament of Canada|Parliament]] for [[Vancouver Centre]] [[Hedy Fry]] specifically discussed fake news as an example of ways in which publishers on the Internet are less accountable than print media. Discussion in parliament contrasted the increase of fake news online with the downsizing of Canadian newspapers and the impact on democracy in Canada. Representatives from Facebook Canada attended the meeting and told members of Parliament they felt it was their duty to assist individuals in gathering data online.<ref>Cheadle, Bruce (November 17, 2016), [http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/as-fake-news-spreads-mps-consider-importance-of-canada-s-local-papers-1.3165962 "As fake news spreads, MPs consider importance of Canada's local papers"], ''[[CTV News]]'', [[The Canadian Press]], retrieved December 11, 2016.</ref>

In January 2017, the [[2017 Conservative Party of Canada leadership election|Conservative leadership campaign]] of [[Kellie Leitch]] admitted to spreading fake news, including false claims that [[Justin Trudeau]] was financing [[Hamas]]. The campaign manager claimed he spread the news in order to provoke negative reactions so that he could determine those who "aren't real Conservatives".<ref>[http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/inside-nick-kouvaliss-fake-news-strategy/ "Inside Nick Kouvalis's fake news strategy"].</ref>

==== Colombia ====
In the fall of 2016, WhatsApp spread fake news that impacted votes critical to Colombian history.<ref name=":3">((cite web|url=http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=f36176ad-2709-42e6-ae2d-413e027767c1%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=128469798&db=aph|title=In Colombia, a WhatsApp Campaign against Posverdad|last=Uribe|first=Pablo Medina|date=2018|website=Academic Search Premier|access-date=March 25, 2019|archive-date=July 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731105850/http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=f36176ad-2709-42e6-ae2d-413e027767c1%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=128469798&db=aph|url-status=dead))</ref> One of the lies spreading rapidly through WhatsApp was that Colombian citizens would receive less pension so former guerrilla fighters would get money.<ref name=":3" /> The misinformation initially began in a question as to whether WhatsApp users approved of the peace accord deal between the national government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) or not. The peace accord would end five decades of war between paramilitary groups (rebel forces) and the Colombian government that resulted in millions of deaths and displaced citizens throughout the country. A powerful influence of votes was the "no" campaign; the "no" campaign was to convince citizens of Colombia to not accept the peace accord because it would be letting the rebel group off "too easily."<ref name=":4">((cite web|url=http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=c2907b6e-a75a-4d54-b5ff-04cd47da55f2%40sdc-v-sessmgr01|title=Peace in Colombia? Hopes and Fears|last=Garavito|first=Tatiana|date=January 11, 2016|website=Academic Search Premier|access-date=March 25, 2019|archive-date=July 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731032437/http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=c2907b6e-a75a-4d54-b5ff-04cd47da55f2%40sdc-v-sessmgr01|url-status=dead))</ref> Uribe, former president of Colombia and of the democratic party, led the "no" campaign. Santos, president in 2016, took liberal approaches during his presidency. Santos won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for his efforts towards a peace accord with rebel forces.<ref name=":5">((cite web|url=http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=196d3ff5-1d26-46f5-9c79-efab94ce2605%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=134492826&db=aph|title=Juan Manuel Santos Calderon|date=2019|website=Academic Search Premier|access-date=March 25, 2019|archive-date=July 31, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731065731/http://libraryproxy.tulsacc.edu:2059/ehost/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=196d3ff5-1d26-46f5-9c79-efab94ce2605%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=134492826&db=aph|url-status=dead))</ref> In addition, Uribe naturally had opposing views to those of Santos.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":3" /> Furthermore, other news spread through WhatsApp were easily misinterpreted by the public, including that Santo's scheme was to put Colombia under harsh rule like Cuba and chaos like Venezuela (under Hugo Chávez), though the logistics were never explained.<ref name=":3" /> In an interview with Juan Carlos Vélez, the "no" campaign manager, he says their strategy was that "We discovered the viral power of social networks."<ref name=":3" /> In addition, the "yes" campaign also took part in spreading fake news through WhatsApp. For instance, a photoshopped image of democratic senator Everth Bustamante him holding a sign reading "I don't want guerrillas in congress" spread to show hypocrisy. This would be seen as hypocritical because he was a former left-wing M-19 guerrilla.<ref name=":3" /> The "no" campaign strongly influenced votes throughout Colombia. "Yes" votes were strong in areas with the highest number of victims and "no" votes in areas influenced by Uribe. As a result, "no" votes totaled 50.2%, compared to 49.8% "yes" votes.<ref name=":4" /> The result of fake news spreading on WhatsApp included changes to the app by journalist [[Juanita León]], who invented the WhatsApp "lie detector" in January 2017 to fight fake news within the app.<ref name=":3" /> Although the accord was eventually signed, the WhatsApp incident further prolonged the accord and spread controversial views among citizens.

==== Mexico ====
((Main|Peñabot))
In Mexico, people tend to rely heavily on social media and direct social contact as news sources, over television and print.<ref name="Reuters2023"/>
Usage of and trust in all types of news sources (including social media) declined from 2017 to 2023. As of 2023, the most-used media companies in Mexico were [[TV Azteca]] news and [[Televisa]].<ref name="Reuters2023"/> 
Televisa is both Mexico's largest television network and the largest media network in the Spanish-speaking world.<ref name="Moore">((cite news |last1=Moore |first1=Thomas |title=$4.8B Univision-Televisa deal will create the largest Spanish-language media company |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/548258-48b-univision-televisa-deal-will-create-the-largest-spanish-language-media/ |work=The Hill |date=14 April 2021))</ref> 
The three most frequently used social media platforms were Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp.<ref name="Reuters2023">((cite web |first=María Elena |last=Gutiérrez-Rentería |date=14 June 2023 |title=Mexico |url=https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/mexico |website=Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism |language=en))</ref>

Prior to 2012, the country's major television networks were central to [[Politics of Mexico|political communication]] in Mexico. They were also closely connected to the long-dominant [[Institutional Revolutionary Party|PRI]] political party.<ref name="Gámiz">((cite journal |last1=Gámiz |first1=Julio Juárez |last2=Toledo |first2=Marco Arellano |title=The fourth era of political communication in Mexico: structural and contextual aspects |journal=Publizistik |date=1 August 2022 |volume=67 |issue=2 |pages=335–355 |doi=10.1007/s11616-022-00732-0 |language=en |issn=1862-2569|doi-access=free ))</ref>  Televiso has been criticized by journalists and academics for misrepresentation and  manipulation of information, and attacks on opponents.<ref name="Lara">((cite news |last1=Lara |first1=Tania |title=Alleged misinformation campaigns by Mexican TV giant lead to creation of watchdog website |url=https://latamjournalismreview.org/articles/alleged-misinformation-campaigns-by-mexican-tv-giant-lead-to-creation-of-watchdog-website/ |work=LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center |date=30 September 2011 |language=en))</ref> Televiso shaped the campaign of [[Enrique Peña Nieto]]<ref name="Meikle"/> whose Presidency from 2012 to 2018 was marked by scandals and decreased trust in television and print media.<ref name="Gámiz"/>

By the [[2012 Mexican general election]], coordinated online disinformation campaigns were part of an "explosion of digital politics" in Mexico.<ref name="Meikle">((cite book |last1=Meikle |first1=Graham |title=The Routledge Companion to Media and Activism |date=9 March 2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-47503-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XHhQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT585 |language=en))</ref><ref name="Watts">((cite news |last1=Watts |first1=Jonathan |last2=Agren |first2=David |last3=correspondent |first3=Latin America |title=Hacker claims he helped Enrique Peña Nieto win Mexican presidential election |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/31/mexico-presidential-election-enrique-pena-nieto-hacking |work=The Guardian |date=1 April 2016))</ref><ref name="Armstrong">((cite news |last1=Armstrong |first1=Mia |title=Mexico's Chapter in the Saga of Election Disinformation |url=https://slate.com/technology/2018/08/mexicos-presidential-election-was-rife-with-disinformation-from-inside-the-country.html |work=Slate |date=2 August 2018))</ref>  
Mexican politicians used digital strategies and algorithms to boost their apparent popularity and undermine or overwhelm opposing messages.<ref name="Meikle"/> 
Attempts to "hack" the "[[attention economy]]" were made to amplify false narratives, capture attention and dominate discourse.<ref name="Goldhaber">((cite journal |last1=Goldhaber |first1=Michael H. |title=The attention economy and the Net |journal=First Monday |date=7 April 1997 |doi=10.5210/fm.v2i4.519 |url=https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/519/440 |language=en |issn=1396-0466 |doi-access=free ))</ref><ref name="boyd">((cite web |last1=Boyd |first1=Danah |title=Hacking the Attention Economy ((!)) danah boyd ((!)) apophenia |url=http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2017/01/06/hacking-the-attention-economy.html?curator=MediaREDEF |website=apophenia|date=January 6, 2017 ))</ref> A network of trolls was formed as early as 2009, to be activated as needed in support of Peña Nieto. Estimates of the number of people involved, and how many were paid, vary widely from 20,000 to 100,000 people. Bots were also used to amplify messages and create "false universes of followers".<ref name="Meikle"/> Opposing voices were drowned out by generating large volumes of meaningless responses from "ghost followers".<ref name="Meikle"/>  In one incident that was analyzed, 50 spam accounts generated 1,000 tweets per day.<ref name="Verkamp">((cite book |last1=Verkamp |first1=John-Paul |last2=Gupta |first2=Minaxi |title=3rd USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI 13)|chapter=Five Incidents, One Theme: Twitter Spam as a Weapon to Drown Voices of Protest |date=2013 |publisher=USENIX Association |location=Washington, D.C. |url=https://www.usenix.org/conference/foci13/workshop-program/presentation/verkamp |language=en))</ref>

Government activities following Peña Nieto's election included the amplification of support for controversial government initiatives.<ref name="Meikle"/> 
After the [[Iguala mass kidnapping|killing or disappearance of a group of activist students]] in 2014, algorithms were used to sabotage trending hashtags on Twitter such as #((Lang|es|YaMeCanse)) ((Gloss|IHaveHadEnough)).<ref name="Meikle"/>  Bots and trolls have also been used for threats and personal attacks.<ref name="Meikle"/>
Between 2017 and 2019, the hashtag #((Lang|es|SalarioRosa)) ((Gloss|Pink Salary for Vulnerability)) was associated with political figure [[Alfredo del Mazo Maza]]  and pushed to the top of Twitter's trending list through [[astroturfing]], creating an appearance of grassroots support. Photographs of women were associated with fake accounts to create the impression that women were engaged in the discussion, "mimicking conversation".<ref name="Espinoza">((cite journal |last1=Espinoza |first1=Armando |last2=Piña-García |first2=Carlos A. |title=Propaganda and Manipulation in Mexico: A Programmed, Coordinated and Manipulative "Pink" Campaign |journal=Journalism and Media |date=June 2023 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=578–598 |doi=10.3390/journalmedia4020037 |language=en |issn=2673-5172 |doi-access=free ))</ref>

As of 2018, 76–80% of people surveyed in Mexico worried about false information or fake news being used as a weapon, the highest rate of any country in the world.<ref>((cite book |title=2018 Edelman Trust Barometer |date=2018 |publisher=Edelman |page=16 |url=https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2018-10/2018_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report_FEB.pdf))</ref>
During the [[2018 Mexican general election|2018 election]], bot battles between candidates drowned out conversations by posting attacks, rumors, unsubstantiated claims, and [[deepfake]]d videos.<ref name="Armstrong"/><ref name="Bandeira">((cite book |last1=Bandeira |first1=Luiza |last2=Barojan |first2=Donara |last3=Braga |first3=Roberta |last4=Peñarredonda |first4=Jose Luis |last5=Argüello |first5=Maria Fernanda Pérez |title=Disinformation in Democracies: Strengthening Digital Resilience in Latin America |date=2019 |publisher=Atlantic Council |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-61977-524-4 |pages=20–29 |url=https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/disinformation-democracies-strengthening-digital-resilience-latin-america/ ))</ref> Forty percent of the election-related tweets on Twitter mentioned [[Andrés Manuel López Obrador]] (AMLO). None of his opponents reached twenty percent of the tweets.<ref name="Bandeira"/>((rp|21))
Automation and artificial amplification used both commercial and political bot services. At one point at least ten pro- and anti-AMLO bots posted over a thousand tweets in a matter of hours using the hashtag #AMLOFest.<ref name="Bandeira"/>((rp|24))

The collaborative journalism project ((Lang|es|Verificado 2018)) was established to address misinformation during the 2018 presidential election.  It involved at least eighty organizations, including local and national media outlets, universities and civil society and advocacy groups. The group researched online claims and political statements and published joint verifications. During the course of the election, they produced over 400 notes and 50 videos documenting false claims and suspect sites, and tracked instances where fake news went viral.<ref name="Armstrong"/><ref name="Bandeira"/>((rp|23)) Verificado.mx received 5.4 million visits during the election, with its partner organizations registering millions more.<ref name="Bandeira"/>((rp|25))

One of the tactics they observed was the promotion of fabricated polls that exaggerated the support for various candidates. The fake polls were claimed to have been carried out by sources such as ''[[The New York Times]]'' and ''[[El Universal (Mexico City)|El Universal]]'', one of Mexico's top newspapers.<ref name="Armstrong"/> 
Another tactic was to share encrypted messages via WhatsApp,  In response, Verificado set up a hotline where WhatsApp users could submit messages for verification and debunking.  Over 10,000 users subscribed to Verificado's hotline.<ref name="Armstrong"/>
Fake messages included false information about where and how to vote.<ref name="Armstrong"/><ref name="Bandeira"/>((rp|25)) One campaign urged anti-AMLO voters to check boxes for both of his opponents – an action that would result in disqualification of the vote.<ref name="Armstrong"/>

Since being elected president in 2018, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO)'s behavior toward the media has been adversarial. He has used his morning addresses or ((Lang|es|mañaneras)) to target journalists such as [[Carmen Aristegui]], [[Carlos Loret de Mola]], and [[Victor Trujillo]]. [[Article 19]], an international human rights organization, considers the Mexican government to be using a "strategy of disinformation" while limiting access to public sources of information. Article 19 estimates that 26.5% of the public information provided by the Mexican government is false.<ref name="Reuters2023"/> 
As of 2019, Mexico became the most dangerous country in the world for journalists,<ref name="Carrie">((cite news |last1=Kahn |first1=Carrie |title=Mexico Surpassess Syria As The Most Dangerous Country For Journalists |url=https://www.npr.org/2019/09/10/759554168/mexico-surpassess-syria-as-the-most-dangerous-country-for-journalists |work=NPR / All Things Considered |date=September 10, 2019))</ref><ref name="Bandeira"/> with a higher death toll than active war zones.<ref name="Kahn">((cite news |last1=Kahn |first1=Gretel |title=The most dangerous place to be a journalist is not an active war zone but Latin America ((!)) Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism |url=https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/most-dangerous-place-be-journalist-not-active-war-zone-latin-america |work=reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk |date=17 January 2023 |language=en))</ref>

During the pandemic, use of social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Facebook increased. In Mexico, the user base of the video app TikTok tripled from 2019 to 2021, reaching 17 million viewers.<ref name="Piña-García"/> Patterns of Twitter activity during the pandemic suggest that astroturfing was used to create an appearance of widespread grassroots support for AMLO and for [[Hugo López-Gatell]] at a time when both men were being criticized for their handling of the [[COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico]],<ref name="Piña-García">((cite journal |last1=Piña-García |first1=C. A. |last2=Espinoza |first2=A. |title=Coordinated campaigns on Twitter during the coronavirus health crisis in Mexico |journal=Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society |date=31 December 2022 |volume=5 |issue=1 |doi=10.1080/25729861.2022.2035935 |language=en |issn=2572-9861|doi-access=free ))</ref>

==== United States ====
((Main|Fake news in the United States|Fake news websites in the United States|Media bias in the United States))

=== Middle East and Africa ===
==== Armenia ====
According to a report by [[openDemocracy]] in 2020, the Armenian website Medmedia.am was spreading disinformation about the coronavirus pandemic, calling [[Coronavirus disease 2019|COVID-19]] a "fake pandemic" and warning Armenians to refuse future vaccine programmes.  The website is led by Gevorg Grigoryan, a doctor who has been critical of the Armenian government's health ministry and its vaccine programmes, and has a history of anti-LGBT statements, including remarks posted on Facebook in which he called for gay people to be burned. ''The Guardian'' said the site was launched with the unwitting help of a US State Department grant intended to promote democracy.<ref>((cite news|title=US government is funding website spreading Covid-19 disinformation|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/28/us-funding-website-spreading-covid-19-disinformation|date=May 28, 2020|newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|access-date=May 29, 2020))</ref>

==== Israel and Palestinian territories ====
((See also|Pallywood))
In 1996, people were killed in the [[Western Wall Tunnel riots]] in reaction to fake news accounts.<ref>((Cite news |last=Frank |first=Caroline |date=September 23, 2014 |title=This Week in History: Violence in the Old City as new tunnel opens |url=https://www.jpost.com/magazine/this-week-in-history-violence-in-the-old-city-as-new-tunnel-opens-376201 |accessdate=October 29, 2022 |newspaper=[[The Jerusalem Post]]))</ref> In April 2018, Palestinian-Israeli football team [[Bnei Sakhnin F.C.|Bnei Sakhnin]] threatened to sue Israeli Prime Minister [[Benjamin Netanyahu]] for libel after he claimed fans booed during a minute of silence for Israeli flash-flood victims.

In a social media post, Netanyahu blasted various Israeli news critical of him, as fake news including [[Channel 2 (Israel)|Channel 2]], [[Channel Ten (Israel)|Channel 10]], ''[[Haaretz]]'' and [[Ynetnews|Ynet]] the same day U.S. President Trump decried "fake news".

The Palestinian Islamist political organization [[Hamas]] published a political program in 2017 intended to ease its position on Israel. Among other things, this charter accepted the borders of the Palestinian state circa the [[Six-Day War]] of 1967.<ref name="auto7">((Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/01/middleeast/hamas-charter-palestinian-israeli/index.html|title=Hamas says it accepts '67 borders, but doesn't recognize Israel|last=Dewan|first=Angela|date=May 5, 2017|work=CNN|access-date=November 10, 2017))</ref> Although this document is an advancement from their previous 1988 charter, which called for the destruction of the State of Israel, it still does not recognize Israel as a legitimate independent nation.<ref name="auto7" /> In a May 2017 video, Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu responded to the coverage of this event by news outlets such as ''[[Al Jazeera Media Network|Al Jazeera]]'', [[CNN]], ''[[The New York Times]]'' and ''[[The Guardian]]'', labeling their reporting "fake news".<ref>((cite web |last1=Swanson |first1=Ian |title=Netanyahu attacks US media as 'fake news' |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/332340-netanyahu-attacks-us-media-as-fake-news |website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |access-date=April 15, 2021 |language=en |date=May 8, 2017))</ref> He specifically disagreed with the notion that Hamas had accepted the state of Israel within their new charter, and called this "a complete distortion of the truth". Instead he said, "The new Hamas document says Israel has no right to exist." ''Haaretz'' fact-checked the video, stating, "Netanyahu, following in the footsteps of Trump, is deliberately twisting the definition of 'fake news' to serve his own needs."<ref>((cite news |last1=Sommer |first1=Allison Kaplan |title=Netanyahu accused CNN, NYT of being 'fake news.' So we fact-checked his fact-check |url=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-pm-lashed-out-at-the-media-we-fact-checked-his-fact-check-1.5469978 |website=[[Haaretz]] |access-date=April 15, 2021 |language=en))</ref> In a later speech, addressed to his supporters, Netanyahu responded to allegations against him: "The fake news industry is at its peak((nbsp))... Look, for example, how they cover with unlimited enthusiasm, every week, the left-wing demonstration. The same demonstrations whose goal is to apply improper pressure on law enforcement authorities so they will file an indictment at any price." ''[[The Washington Post]]'' likened his use of the term ''fake news'' for describing left-wing media to Donald Trump's similar statements during the [[2016 United States elections|2016 United States election]] cycle.<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/echoing-trump-a-defiant-netanyahu-attacks-fake-news-as-investigations-heat-up/2017/08/13/021f712e-7ecd-11e7-b2b1-aeba62854dfa_story.html|title=Echoing Trump, a defiant Netanyahu attacks 'fake news' as investigations heat up|last=Morris|first=Loveday|date=August 13, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=November 10, 2017))</ref>

In studies conducted by Yifat Media Check Ltd. and Hamashrokit (((Gloss|The Whistle)), a fact-checking organization), they found that over 70% of statements made by Israeli political leaders were not accurate.<ref>((Cite news |last=Stern |first=Itay |date=November 18, 2018 |title=Netanyahu is Israel's fake news champion, studies find |url=https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-netanyahu-is-israel-s-fake-news-champion-studies-find-1.6660523 |newspaper=[[Haaretz]]))</ref>

Some of the fake news Israel has been the victim of includes [[Israel-related animal conspiracy theories]], which claim Israel is using various animals to spy on or attack others with.<ref>((cite news |last1=Morgan |first1=Wesley |title=A short history of conspiracy theories about the U.S. military in the Middle East |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/12/03/a-short-history-of-conspiracy-theories-about-the-u-s-military-in-the-middle-east/ |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=December 3, 2015 ))</ref>

==== Saudi Arabia ====
According to the ''Global News'', [[Saudi Arabia]]'s state-owned television spread fake news about [[Canada]]. In August 2018, Canada's ''Global News'' reported that state-owned television ''[[Al Arabiya]]'', "has suggested that Canada is the worst country in the world for women, that it has the highest suicide rate and that it treats its Indigenous people the way Myanmar treats the Rohingya—a Muslim minority massacred and driven out of Myanmar en masse last year."<ref>((cite news |title=Here's the fake news Saudi Arabia is playing about Canada |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4386816/saudi-arabia-fake-news-canada/ |work=[[Global News]] |date=August 15, 2018))</ref>

In October 2018, [[Twitter]] has suspended a number of [[Internet bot|bot accounts]] that appeared to be spreading pro-Saudi rhetoric about the disappearance of Saudi opposition journalist [[Jamal Khashoggi]].<ref>((cite news |title=Twitter pulls down bot network that pushed pro-Saudi talking points about disappeared journalist |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/exclusive-twitter-pulls-down-bot-network-pushing-pro-saudi-talking-n921871 |work=NBC News |date=October 19, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=Twitter removes network of pro-Saudi bots |url=https://news.theceomagazine.com/news/fake-news-bots-saudi-arabia-deleted-twitter/ |work=CEO Magazine |date=October 19, 2018))</ref>

According to ''Newsweek'', Saudi Arabia's Office of Public Prosecution tweeted that "producing rumors or fake news [that Saudi Arabia's government was involved in the disappearance of Khashoggi] that would affect the public order or public security or sending or resending it via social media or any technical means" is punishable "by five years and a fine of 3((nbsp))million [[Saudi riyal|riyals]]".<ref>((cite news |title=Saudi Arabia warns those who spread 'fake news' will be jailed, fined, amid rumors it had journalist killed |url=https://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabia-fake-news-jamal-khashoggi-1170613 |work=Newsweek |date=October 15, 2018))</ref>

[[Iran]]ian-backed Twitter accounts have spread sensational fake news and rumours about Saudi Arabia.<ref>((cite news |title=Iranian-backed pages spread fake news of a Saudi coup |url=https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/iranian-backed-pages-spread-fake-news-of-a-saudi-coup-1.782096 |work=The National |date=October 18, 2018))</ref>

On August 1, 2019, Facebook identified hundreds of accounts that were running a covert network on behalf of government of the [[Saudi Arabia|Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]] to spread fake news and attack regional rivals. The social media giant removed more than 350 accounts, pages and groups with nearly 1.4 million followers.<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-saudi-arabia-government-campaign-cyber-security-a9034796.html|title=Facebook takes down first covert propaganda campaign tied to Saudi government|access-date=August 1, 2019|newspaper=The Independent))</ref> Along with Facebook, these accounts were involved in "coordinated inauthentic behavior" on [[Instagram]] as well. According to a Facebook blog post, the network was running two different political agendas, one on behalf of Saudi Arabia and the other for the [[United Arab Emirates]] and [[Egypt]].<ref>((cite web|url=https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2019/08/cib-uae-egypt-saudi-arabia/|title=Removing coordinated inauthentic behavior in UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia|date=August 2019|access-date=August 1, 2019|publisher=Facebook Newsroom))</ref>

==== Syria ====
In February 2017, [[Amnesty International]] reported that up to 13,000 people had been hanged in a Syrian prison as part of an "extermination" campaign. Syrian president [[Bashar al-Assad]] questioned the credibility of Amnesty International and called the report "fake news" fabricated to undermine the government. "You can forge anything these days—we are living in a fake news era."<ref>((cite news|last1=Farland|first1=Chloe|title=Reports Syrian regime hanged 13,000 prisoners branded 'fake news' by Bashar al-Assad|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/bashar-al-assad-syria-hanged-13000-political-prisoners-amnesty-international-fake-news-era-product-a7573961.html|website=Independent|access-date=January 17, 2018))</ref>

Russia ran a disinformation campaign during the [[Syrian Civil War]] to discredit the humanitarian rescue organisation [[White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)|White Helmets]], and to discredit reports and images of children and other civilian bombing victims. This was done to weaken criticism of Russia's involvement in the war.<ref>((cite magazine |last1=Ellis |first1=Emma |title=Inside the Conspiracy Theory That Turned Syria's First Responders Into Terrorists |url=https://www.wired.com/2017/04/white-helmets-conspiracy-theory/ |magazine=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |access-date=October 19, 2018))</ref> The United Nations and international chemical inspectors found Bashar al-Assad responsible for use of chemical weapons,<ref>((Cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/26/middleeast/syria-khan-sheikhoun-chemical-attack-sarin/index.html |title=UN: Syria responsible for sarin attack that killed scores |first1=Steve |last1=Almasy |first2=Richard |last2=Roth |publisher=CNN |access-date=June 12, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612174315/https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/26/middleeast/syria-khan-sheikhoun-chemical-attack-sarin/index.html |archive-date=June 12, 2018 |url-status=live))</ref> which was called "fake news" by Russia. Russia promoted various contradictory claims that no chemicals were present, or attributing the chemical attacks to other countries or groups.<ref>((cite news |title=Russia dismisses allegations of Syria chemical attack as "fake news" |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/syria-chemical-attack-douma-fake-news-russia-says-warning-to-donald-trump/ |access-date=October 22, 2018 |agency=[[CBS News]] |date=April 10, 2018 |language=en))</ref><ref>((cite news |title=US says Syria did use chemical weapons to kill civilians, Russia claims UK helped 'fake' attack |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-13/russia-says-syria-chemical-attack-staged/9657314 |access-date=October 22, 2018 |work=ABC News |date=April 13, 2018 |language=en-AU))</ref><ref>((cite web |last1=Nahas |first1=Noor |title=Russia ramps up chemical weapon disinformation leading-up to Idlib offensive – Bellingcat |url=https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2018/08/30/russian-chem-disinfo-idlib/ |website=[[Bellingcat]] |access-date=October 22, 2018 |date=August 30, 2018))</ref><ref>((cite news |last1=Lybrand |first1=Holmes |title=Birth of a Counternarrative |url=https://www.weeklystandard.com/holmes-lybrand/how-the-russian-propaganda-machine-turns-out-seriously-fake-news |access-date=October 22, 2018 |work=The Weekly Standard |date=May 11, 2018 |language=en))</ref><ref>((cite web |last1=Nimmo |first1=Ben |title=#PutinAtWar: Far Right Converges on "False Flag" in Syria |url=https://www.stopfake.org/en/putinatwar-far-right-converges-on-false-flag-in-syria/ |website=StopFake.org |access-date=October 22, 2018 |date=April 10, 2018))</ref>

==== United Arab Emirates ====
The [[United Arab Emirates]] (UAE) had been funding [[non-profit organizations]], [[think tanks]] and [[Freelancer|contributors]] of [[journalism]], including [[Foundation for Defense of Democracies]] (FDD) and the [[Middle East Forum]] (MEF), which further paid journalists spreading fake information to defame countries like [[Qatar]]. In 2020, a researcher at FDD, Benjamin Weinthal, and fellow at MEF, [[Jonathan Spyer]], contributed an article on ''[[Fox News]]'' to promote a negative image of Qatar, in an attempt to stain its [[Qatar–United States relations|diplomatic relations with the United States]].<ref>((cite web|url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/7/trump-complains-about-fox-news/|title=Trump complains about Fox News, and he may be right|access-date=August 7, 2020|website=The Washington Times))</ref>

==== Egypt ====
According to ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', an Egyptian official suggested in 2010 that the Israeli spy agency [[Mossad]] could have been behind a fatal shark attack in [[Sharm el-Sheikh]].<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/8185915/Shark-sent-to-Egypt-by-Mossad.html|title=Shark 'sent to Egypt by Mossad'|first=Nick|last=Collins|date=December 7, 2010|website=Telegraph.co.uk))</ref> It was estimated by the Egyptian Parliament's Communication and Information Technology Committee that in 2017, 53,000 false rumors had been spread primarily through social media in 60 days.<ref>((Cite web|last=Sadek|first=George|date=April 2019|title=Initiatives to Counter Fake News|url=https://www.loc.gov/law/help/fake-news/egypt.php|access-date=April 17, 2021|website=www.loc.gov))</ref>

==== South Africa ====
A wide range of South African media sources have reported fake news as a growing problem and tool to both increase distrust in the media, discredit political opponents, and divert attention from corruption.<ref>Daniels, Glenda (February 15, 2017). [https://mg.co.za/article/2017-02-15-fake-news-and-journalism-schadenfreude-and-you "How fake news works as political machinery to tarnish the integrity of journalists"]. ''[[The Mail and Guardian]]''. Retrieved February 27, 2017.</ref> Media outlets owned by the [[Gupta family]] have been noted by other South African media organisations such as [[The Huffington Post|''The Huffington Post'']] (South Africa), ''[[The Sunday Times (South Africa)|Sunday Times]],'' [[Radio 702]], and ''[[City Press (South Africa)|City Press]]'' for targeting them.<ref>Herman, Paul (February 2, 2017). [http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/zuma-is-one-big-fake-news-site-pityana-20170202 "'Zuma is one big fake news site' – Pityana"] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170228084536/http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/zuma-is-one-big-fake-news-site-pityana-20170202 |date=February 28, 2017 )). News24. Retrieved February 27, 2017.</ref> Individuals targeted include Finance Minister [[Pravin Gordhan]] who was seen as blocking Gupta attempts at [[state capture]] with accusations levelled against Gordhan of promoting state capture for "[[white monopoly capital]]".<ref>Ngoepe, Karabo (January 23, 2017). [http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/2017/01/23/fake-news-its-not-as-straight-up-as-it-seems/ "Fake News – 'It's shifting the political narrative'"] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128150608/http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/2017/01/23/fake-news-its-not-as-straight-up-as-it-seems/ |date=January 28, 2017 )). [[HuffPost|Huffington Post South Africa]]. Retrieved January 29, 2017.</ref><ref>Roux, Jean (January 23, 2017). [http://mg.co.za/article/2017-01-27-00-hidden-hand-drives-social-media-smears "Hidden hand drives social media smears"]. ''[[Mail and Guardian]]''. Retrieved January 29, 2017.</ref>

The [[African National Congress]] (ANC) was taken to court by Sihle Bolani for unpaid work she did during the election on the ANC's behalf. In court papers Bolani stated that the ANC used her to launch and run a covert R50 million fake news and [[disinformation]] campaign during the [[2016 South African municipal elections|2016 municipal elections]] with the intention of discrediting opposition parties.<ref>((cite web|url=http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-01-24-inside-the-ancs-black-ops-election-campaign|title=Inside the ANC's "black ops" election campaign|website=Amabhungane.co.za|language=en|access-date=January 29, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128175330/http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-01-24-inside-the-ancs-black-ops-election-campaign|archive-date=January 28, 2017|url-status=dead))</ref><ref>((cite web|url=http://www.enca.com/south-africa/anc-spent-millions-on-dirty-tricks-cope|title=ANC spent millions on dirty tricks: Cope|date=January 26, 2017|website=enca.com|publisher=Africa News Agency|language=en|access-date=January 29, 2017|archive-date=January 28, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128193531/http://www.enca.com/south-africa/anc-spent-millions-on-dirty-tricks-cope|url-status=dead))</ref><ref>((Cite news|url=http://mg.co.za/article/2017-01-24-shaka-sisulu-on-anc-election-accuations-its-fake-news|title=It's fake news, says Shaka Sisulu of ANC election accusations|date=January 24, 2017|newspaper=[[Mail and Guardian]]|language=en|access-date=January 29, 2017))</ref>

=== Oceania ===

==== Australia ====
The Australian Parliament initiated investigation into "fake news" regarding issues surrounding fake news that occurred during the 2016 United States election. The inquiry looked at several major areas in Australia to find audiences most vulnerable to fake news, by considering the impact on traditional journalism, and by evaluating the liability of online advertisers and by regulating the spreading the hoaxes. This act of parliament is meant to combat the threat of social media spreading fake news.<ref>Remeikis, A. (2017). [http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/parliament-to-launch-inquiry-into-fake-news-in-australia-20170330-gv9xwz.html "Parliament to launch inquiry into 'fake news' in Australia"], ''[[The Sydney Morning Herald]]''.</ref>

The Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation commenced on 22 February 2021, around 12 months after the Australian Government asked digital platforms to develop a voluntary code to address disinformation and misinformation and assist users of their services to more easily identify the reliability, trustworthiness and source of news content. The request is part of a broader Australian Government strategy to reform the technology and information dissemination landscape. The Australian Communications and Media (ACMA) oversaw the development of the code. The Government will then consider the need for further measures including mandatory regulation.<ref>((Cite web|url=https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/fake-news-look-australian-code-practice-disinformation-misinformation|title=Fake News: the Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation &#124; G+T|website=www.gtlaw.com.au|accessdate=October 29, 2022))</ref>

A well-known case of fabricated news in [[Australia]] happened in 2009 when a report, ''Deception detection across Australian populations'', by a "Levitt Institute" was widely cited on news websites across the country, claiming that [[Sydney]] was the most naive city, despite the fact that the report itself contained a clue: amidst the mathematical gibberish, there was a statement: "These results were completely made up to be fictitious material through a process of modified truth and credibility nodes."<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2698835.htm "Deception detection deficiency"], ''Media Watch'', episode 34, September 28, 2009, [[ABC (Australian TV channel)|ABC TV]]</ref>

== See also ==
((Portal|Internet|Journalism|Politics|Psychology|Society))
<!-- alphabetical order please & add a short description [[WP:SEEALSO]] -->
((div col|colwidth=30em|small=yes))
* ((annotated link |Alarmism))
* ((annotated link |Alternative facts))
* ((annotated link |Big lie))
* ((annotated link |Chequebook journalism))
* ((annotated link |Citizen journalism))
* ((Annotated link |Clickbait))
* ((Annotated link |Confirmation bias))
* ((annotated link |Demoralization (warfare)))
* ((Annotated link |Disinformation))
* ((Annotated link |Doomscrolling))
* ((Annotated link |Echo chamber (media)))
* ((Annotated link |Euromyth))
* ((Annotated link |Fact))
* ((Annotated link |Fact-checking))
* ((annotated link |Factoid))
* ((Annotated link |Fake news website))
* ((Annotated link |Fallacy of composition))
* ((Annotated link |False equivalence))
* ((annotated link |Fearmongering))
* ((Annotated link |Filter bubble))
* ((Annotated link |Firehose of falsehood))
* ((Annotated link |Freedom of the press))
* ((annotated link |Information quality))
* ((Annotated link |Information silo))
* ((annotated link |Internet meme))
* ((annotated link |Journalism ethics and standards))
* ((Annotated link|Knowledge falsification))
* ((Annotated link |Lamestream media))
* ((Annotated link |List of fake news websites))
* ((Annotated link |Muckraker))
* ((Annotated link |Political bias))
* ((Annotated link |Post-truth politics))
* ((annotated link |Pseudohistory))
* ((Annotated link |Selective exposure theory))
* ((Annotated link |Social Networks))
* ((Annotated link |Spiral of silence))
* ((Annotated link |Tabloid journalism))
* ((Annotated link |Tribe (Internet)))
* ((Annotated link |Troll farm))
* ((Annotated link |Truthiness))
* ((Annotated link |Yellow journalism))
((div col end))
<!--alphabetical order please-->

== Notes ==
((Notelist))

== References ==
((Reflist))

=== Sources ===
((Free-content attribution
|title=World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development Global Report 2017/2018|author=University of Oxford|publisher=UNESCO|page numbers=202|source=|documentURL=http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002610/261065e.pdf|license statement URL=http://www.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?catno=261065&set=005B2A1A4F_2_135&gp=1&lin=1&ll=1|license=CC BY SA 3.0 IGO))

== Further reading ==
* ((cite web |first1=Julie |last1=Posetti |first2=Alice |last2=Matthews |url=https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/A%20Short%20Guide%20to%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20and%20Disinformation_ICFJ%20Final.pdf |title=A short guide to the history of 'fake news' and disinformation |work=International Center for Journalists))
* ((cite web |first1=Anumeha |last1=Chaturvedi |date=December 20, 2019 |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/fake-news-still-a-menace-despite-government-crackdown-fact-checkers/articleshow/72895472.cms |title=2019 - The year of fake news|work=The Economic Times))
*Malik, Shahnawaz Ahmed, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3660324 Fake news: Legal analysis of false and misleading news and cyber propaganda] (February 5, 2019). AD VALOREM- Journal of Law: Volume 6: Issue II: Part-III: April–June 2019: ISSN : 2348–5485.
*Arun, Chinmayi, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3336127 On WhatsApp, rumours, lynchings, and the Indian Government] (January 3, 2019). Economic & Political Weekly vol. lIV no. 6.
*Nagar, Itisha and Gill, Simran, [https://ssrn.com/abstract=3651297 Head is where the herd is: Fake news and effect of online social conformity on Islamophobia in Indians]. SSHO-D-20-00611, ((doi|10.2139/ssrn.3651297))
* ((cite book |last1=Bounegru |first1=Liliana |last2=Gray |first2=Jonathan |last3=Venturini |first3=Tommaso |last4=Mauri |first4=Michele |date=January 8, 2018|title=A field guide to "fake news" and other information disorders |url=http://fakenews.publicdatalab.org/ |location=Amsterdam |publisher=Public Data Lab)) ''An open access guide exploring the use of digital methods to study false viral news, political memes, trolling practices and their social life online.''
* ((cite book |last=Brotherton |first=Rob |title=Bad News: Why We Fall for Fake News|publisher=Bloomsbury Sigma |year=2020 |isbn=9781472962881 ))
* Cortada, James W. and William Aspray. ''Fake news nation: The long history of lies and misinterpretations in America'' (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2019) [http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=55213 online review]; also [https://www.amazon.com/Fake-News-Nation-History-Misinterpretations/dp/1538131102/ excerpt of book]
* Higgins, Andrew et al. [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/world/europe/fake-news-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-georgia.html "Inside a fake news sausage factory: 'This is all about income(('"))] ''[[The New York Times]]'' November 25, 2016
* Horner, Paul (2017). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170426081655/http://newsexaminer.net/paul-horner-news/paul-horner-news-internet-news-satirist-writer-news-examiner/ An online journal by satirist Paul Horner, listing all of his best hoaxes and fake news over the past 20 years. However, his satire was often spread far and wide by uncritical people believing it was true.]
* ((cite news|author=Robson, David|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/apr/01/why-smart-people-are-more-likely-to-believe-fake-news|title=Why smart people are more likely to believe fake news |newspaper=[[The Guardian]]|date=April 1, 2019))
* ((cite news |url=http://www.dw.com/en/fake-news-casts-wide-net-but-has-little-effect/a-42029486|publisher=[[Deutsche Welle]] |title=Fake news 'casts wide net but has little effect'|first=Elizabeth|last=Schumacher|date= January 4, 2018))
* ((cite news |last=Sirota |first=David |author-link=David Sirota |date=February 9, 2022|title=The Real Fake News Crisis in America Comes From Corporate Media |url=https://jacobinmag.com/2022/02/corporations-propoaganda-misinformation-cnn-cuomo-rogan |work=[[Jacobin (magazine)|Jacobin]]))
* ((cite book |last=Tucher |first=Andie |title=Not Exactly Lying: Fake News and Fake Journalism in American History |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0231186353 ))
* ((cite book |last=Young |first=Kevin |title=Bunk: The rise of hoaxes, humbug, plagiarists, phonies, post-facts, and fake news |publisher=Graywolf Press |year=2017 |isbn=978-1555977917 ))

== External links ==
((Wikiquote-inline))
* [https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/commission-on-information-disorder-final-report Aspen Institute Commission on Information Disorder Final Report (2021). ]
* [https://apnews.com/NotRealNews Associated Press. AP Not Real News]: A weekly roundup of the most popular, but completely untrue, headlines of the week.
* [https://edition.cnn.com/specials/reliable-sources-signup CNN Reliable Sources.] A much watched email newsletter four times a week, edited by Oliver Darcy, about trends and events in the media, mainly United States. Contains a valuable section "Info Wars". This replaces a previous longrunning CNN interview program hosted by Brian Stelter.
* [https://firstdraftnews.org/en/education/curriculum-resources First Draft Guide to Online Resources that Target Misinformation. ] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122160217/https://firstdraftnews.org/en/education/curriculum-resources/ |date=January 22, 2021 )) For example: Google Reverse Image Search (to identity the source of fake photos).
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk5IWzTfWeM Fry, Stephen (narrator). How to spot fake news. "How do we know what is true?" (animated video; 2:52)]. One video in the series That's Humanism, all narrated by Stephen Fry.
* [https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/ HKS Misinformation Review. ] Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy. A peer-reviewed, open-source scholarly publication with a fast review process and an emphasis on real-world situations. All content is targeted towards a specialized audience of researchers, journalists, fact-checkers, educators, policy makers, and other practitioners working in the information, media, and platform landscape fields.
* [https://www.isdglobal.org Institute for Strategic Dialogue, London.] Powering solutions to extremism, hate and disinformation.
* Scientific American (2020). Truth vs lies (Special edition), volume 29, no 4, Fall 2020. Contains 26 essays on understanding the science of misinformation and deception, and how to know what is real. Published later as an e-book. Plus: Revised edition, volume 32. no 5, Fall 2022.
* [https://www.snopes.com Snopes]. The largest and oldest fact-checking website, founded in 1994.
* [https://www.truthorfiction.com TruthorFiction] Seeking truth and exposing fiction since 1999.

((Disinformation))
((Media manipulation))
((Journalism))
((Media culture))
((Authority control))

((DEFAULTSORT:Fake news websites))
[[Category:Fake news| ]]
[[Category:Anti-intellectualism]]
[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
[[Category:Barriers to critical thinking]]
[[Category:Communication of falsehoods]]
[[Category:Confidence tricks]]
[[Category:Conspiracist media]]
[[Category:Criticism of journalism]]
[[Category:Deception]]
[[Category:Disinformation operations]]
[[Category:Internet culture]]
[[Category:Internet fraud]]
[[Category:Internet hoaxes]]
[[Category:Internet manipulation and propaganda]]
[[Category:Internet-related controversies]]
[[Category:Journalistic hoaxes]]
[[Category:Mass media and entertainment controversies]]
[[Category:Media bias controversies]]
[[Category:News media manipulation]]
[[Category:Propaganda techniques]]
[[Category:Social engineering (computer security)]]
[[Category:2010s neologisms]]
[[Category:Lying]]